Colorado terrorist's lawyer previously banned from practicing due to "immigration misconduct"

Here’s a real head-scratcher from the land of legal lunacy. The lawyer defending Mohamed Sabry Soliman, you know, the guy charged with chucking a firebomb at a peaceful pro-Israel rally in Boulder, Colorado, apparently got herself kicked out of the lawyer game just a few years back. 

Why? Oh, just a little thing called “misconduct concerning an immigration matter.” No biggie, right?

Sean Davis over at The Federalist dropped this gem on X, laying it out like a prosecutor's dream: Susanna Dvortsin, the attorney in question, got her law license yanked by the South Dakota Supreme Court in 2019. And not just a slap on the wrist, they straight-up barred her from practicing in the state.

“Guess who was banned from practicing law in 2019 for immigration misconduct? The attorney for the illegal immigrant family of the Egyptian terrorist who set a bunch of Jews on fire in Colorado,” Davis wrote, not pulling any punches.

But wait, it gets better. 

The South Dakota Supreme Court wasn’t the only one fed up with Dvortsin. The U.S. Department of Justice went full Thor’s hammer on her, banning her from practicing before the Department of Homeland Security in 2019. Their statement was crystal clear: “[Dvortsin] is immediately suspended from the practice of law before the Board [of Immigration Appeals], the Immigration Courts, or the DHS.” 

That’s the kind of thing that makes you wonder if she missed the “don’t break the law while practicing law” memo.

Davis tossed in a screenshot of a news story showing Dvortsin is now representing Soliman and his family as the Trump administration tries to lock him up and ship the rest of his clan out of the country. He also shared a snapshot of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision, which didn’t spill the tea on exactly what “misconduct” Dvortsin pulled but backed up South Dakota’s 115-day ban and added their own. They ordered her to notify everyone involved in her pending cases before the Board, DHS, or Immigration Courts that she was persona non grata. Bet those were some fun phone calls.

So, here we are: a terrorist’s lawyer with a rap sheet for immigration shenanigans. Just another day in the clown show, right? Stay tuned, because this one’s bound to get weirder.

Hey guys, if you like my blog,  feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee  It’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused, albeit somewhat hyper. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Twitter boots Federalist Editor for the scientific description of Rear Adm. Rachel Levine

Senior Editor of The Federalist John Daniel Davidson was locked out of his Twitter account over the weekend for accurately calling Rachel Levine, [a person with a penis an XY chromosomes] a man, in spite of the fact that Levine dresses like a woman and shaves his legs and testicles. Levine also lacks a uterus and although he has recently cut his long locks because he was made a Rear Admiral for some reason, he is still a man, regardless of any delusions he may harbor.

Levine, like other folks with gender dysphoria, calls himself a woman, and works for the PINO Biden administration.

“They’re not even trying to hide it anymore,” Davidson wrote. “If you say that Rachel Levine is a man, they will come after you. Doesn’t matter that Levine is in fact a man. Truth is no defense.”

Even science, you know, biology, is no defense, in spite of the left pretending to "follow the science."

Less than 24 hours after the post, Davidson’s account was locked by the platform for 12 hours. He must delete the tweet to have his account restored. Davidson said he would not delete the tweet, just like the Babylon Bee also refused to do when they were locked out of Twitter. The creeps at Twitter could delete the tweet themselves, but they want these people to bend the knee and beg for forgiveness. Bravo for Davidson and the Babylon Bee.

Another tweet from Davidson that referred to Levine as a man was flagged by Twitter and blocked in Germany after some asshole reported the tweet.

“In accordance with applicable law and our policies, Twitter is now withholding the above content in Germany,” the warning message from Twitter read.

His Adam's Apple, penis and testicles give him away

“Apparently in Germany, you're not allowed to say on Twitter that Rachel Levine is a man,” Davidson tweeted with a screenshot of the warning.

Twitter faced controversy regarding its conduct with The Federalist just last week.

NewsBusters reported that Twitter relayed the following message to users who tried to access the publication’s content: 

“The link you are trying to access has been identified by Twitter or our partners as being potentially spammy or unsafe.” The warning also said the content could be “violent or misleading.”

Evidently, the people at Twitter have never actually been victims of real violence because words are not dangerous unless followed up by violence. And the only "misleading" thing about Rachel Levine being a man is the fact that Twitter wants to mislead you into believing that a person can think they are the opposite sex and, Poof, they are. It's magic and imagine how powerful this would be for little kids, who often believe in magic, to hear that message and buy into it.

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

You want violence? Go to an Antifa or BLM protest. The Left will not call it violence as buildings burn, stores are looted, people are attacked who try to protect their small businesses. But calling Rachel Levine and his twig and berries a man is stating a fact.

Facts are not violence. But when leftists and their organizations call things they disagree with 'violent,' that gives them an excuse to react violently to those things and people with whom they disagree. And the things they claim about conservatives, is always a projection of what they think and do.

Tweet

Biden's DOJ nominee supports ditching the police

"No justice, no police." That seems to be the cry from some on the Lunatic Left.

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) warned in a statement Thursday night that Vanita Gupta would make the country less safe for citizens and more safe for criminals based on her far-left policy of defunding the police.

“Vanita Gupta, President Biden’s nominee for Associate Attorney General, would make America less safe. She must be stopped,” Cotton tweeted on social media. “More than 83k Americans died from drug overdoses last year, but Gupta wants to ‘decriminalize’ possession of ALL drugs, even fentanyl. Opioids are already ravaging our communities—we shouldn’t give fentanyl, heroin, or cocaine dealers get-out-of-jail-free cards.”

“As recently as last summer, Vanita Gupta called to defund the police,” Cotton continued. “Her allies in the jailbreak industry—who are clamoring for access to the Biden DOJ—are now trying to deny what she said. But see for yourself where Vanita Gupta stands on defunding the police.”

Sen. Cotton included a statement that Gupta made to the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary last summer. Her statements were made concurrent to the Antifa and BLM riots that were perpetrated across the country in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd, who likely died of a drug overdose while being arrested for a different crime.

Gupta said:

While front-end systems changes are important, it is also critical for state and local leaders to heed calls from Black Lives Matter and Movement for Black Lives activists to decrease police budgets and the scope, role, and responsibility of police in our lives. [My emphasis.]

As recently as last summer, Vanita Gupta called to defund the police. Her allies in the jailbreak industry—who are clamoring for access to the Biden DOJ—are now trying to deny what she said.

But see for yourself where Vanita Gupta stands on defunding the police: pic.twitter.com/juU9zf08ws

— Tom Cotton (@TomCottonAR) March 5, 2021

Cotton continued:

“No wonder Soros prosecutors like Chesa Boudin in San Francisco have endorsed Gupta. Gupta would promote their pro-crime agenda. Soros prosecutors caused a massive spike in crime in major cities across the country by refusing to prosecute criminals. Why would we trust their judgment for the Department of Justice? The Senate should be suspicious of anyone they endorse.”

The senator concluded by encouraging Biden to withdraw Gupta's nomination and select someone who would "uphold the law."

The Washington Free Beacon pointed out that there are potential conflicts of interest with Gupta’s nomination to a top DOJ spot, which she withheld from the U.S. Senate.

“Her father is Rajiv L. Gupta, a chemicals magnate turned Wall Street adviser and board member for Fortune 500 companies,” the report said. “Gupta made no mention of her father’s sprawling corporate network on a Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire that asked her to identify prospective conflicts, despite the fact that the Justice Department has repeatedly sparred with her father’s businesses in recent years.”

Legal Newsline this week reported that Attorneys General from five states are urging Biden to withdraw Gupta's nomination for associate AG, which is the number three position at the DOJ.

“Ms. Gupta’s past comments and track record have demonstrated her disinterest in meaningful police reform in favor of destructive policies that would defund the police,” the AGs from Indiana, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas wrote in a March 1 letter to the president. “ Her nomination will further divide our nation instead of implementing policies to protect our communities and support law enforcement.”

The letter said that while some of Gupta’s backers claim she supports police, past comments show that she actually supports defunding the police.

“In fact, she wants to get away from a ‘policing approach’ and has urged Congress to ‘redirect government dollars away from policing practices rooted in the criminal-legal system,’ the AGs wrote. “Calling on Congress to shift resources from police to other priorities is a call for defunding the police, and that is not something Americans support. This is a time when our local law enforcement agencies need additional resources, not fewer.”

The Federalist reported that in September Gupta’s interest group, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, urged Congress to “redirect government dollars away from policing practices rooted in the criminal-legal system and carceral state and toward practices that reflect a vision of public safety that promotes community health and rebuilds trust.”

Yes, one can safely say that "redirecting" government money away from "policing practices" is the same thing as defunding the police. If you remove my wallet from my back pocket and redirect my money from it, you've defunded me, even if you used that money to buy something for your momma.

In March 2019, Gupta's organization published a 416-page report calling to remove police in all schools, and advocated for “community policing” over “real” policing measures carried out by trained law enforcement.

“Police officers should have no role in student disciplinary matters,” the report posits. “Even leaders who express a commitment to community policing sometimes view it as separate and distinct from ‘real’ law enforcement. Some delegate the task of cultivating community relationships to a handful of officers and assign others to patrolling streets and responding to calls.”

Of course, it all becomes "real" law enforcement the moment the law is broken and violence begins.

While I don't know this as fact and I'm just spitballing, I suspect Gupta's two sons, if they are of school-age, attend private schools with good security. If you know this as fact, or that I'm mistaken, please feel free to comment.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus

Tweet

Planned Parenthood execs admit under oath to selling baby body parts

What a delightful group of people those Planned Parenthood (PP) people are with their "do no harm" doctors sucking out the brains from the soft skulls of the unborn, killing them for profit and even selling baby body parts to the highest bidder. 

You might recall Dr. Mary Gatter, a former medical director of Planned Parenthood Los Angeles shown on earlier undercover CMP videos haggling about the cost of aborted baby body parts and saying, “I want a Lamborghini.” 

What a delight.

Well, now in a new video featuring sworn testimony from PP leaders we discovered that they lied to Congress and the media about its aborted baby body parts trade in Texas. 

They admitted that they sold baby body parts. [H/T The Federalist]

The Center for Medical Progress (CMP) released the video Thursday, highlighting conflicting statements that the abortion chain made about its Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast affiliate in Texas, The Federalist reports.

“When the undercover videos were first released, Planned Parenthood delivered a carefully-constructed script to the public and to the press minimizing their involvement in fetal experimentation–but under oath, their story changes,” CMP founder David Daleiden said.

The PP butchers initially claimed that its Gulf Coast affiliate doesn't have a fetal tissue program, only an agreement with the University of Texas to donate placentas to its medical researchers, according to the video. But in a 2019 court testimony featured in the CMP video, it was revealed that it was a lie. 

The video shows Melissa Farrell, the vice president of research at Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, admitting under oath that her affiliate provides the “products of conception in its entirety” – which includes the aborted baby’s body, placenta, umbilical cord and amniotic sac — to the university.

Putting any doubts to rest, CMP also uncovered contracts showing that Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast charged $150 per specimen to the University of Texas.

In her sworn testimony, Gatter answered questions about Novogenix Laboratories, LLC, a company that her Planned Parenthood affiliate used to work with to collect aborted baby body parts.

When Gatter was asked if her affiliate had researchers other than the Novogenix company come “to collect” aborted baby parts, she initially said no. 

Until she said yes by clarifying: “Can I just–let me, I’d like to amend that, to say, there is a difference between tissue collection for a big organization, that they collect the tissue – a tissue procurement organization – and a specific research project. Now, we may in fact have been involved in specific research projects, but that’s a whole different category from fetal tissue donation.”

The Center for Medical Progress has exposed a number of troubling statements from Planned Parenthood leaders’ sworn testimonies this year. Among the most horrific was a video released in June showing a Planned Parenthood partner admitting that body parts were harvested from aborted babies who still had beating hearts.

PP asked a federal judge on Wednesday to seal the court deposition videos so that CMP cannot share them publicly anymore, according to The Federalist.

Daleiden said the billion-dollar abortion chain must be held accountable.

Gee, ya think?

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon.

Tweet

Comrade Bernie Sanders' reveals his 'hit list' of anti-endorsements

I want my pudding

Communist Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) unveiled a list of 13 "anti-endorsements" as he put it, on Wednesday.  He bragged that he is "proud" to be opposed by "modern-day oligarchs" including Disney CEO Bob Iger, billionaire Haim Saban, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and Home Depot co-founder Kenneth Langone. In fact, anyone who makes more money than he brings in, or has more or bigger homes than he has, is a worthless capitalist oligarch.

Others on the list were former Verizon CEO Lowell McAdam (who has called Sanders' socialist views "contemptible"), former General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt and former Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein (who has implied that Sanders' efforts could be "dangerous").

The politics of communism and socialism is the politics of envy and loathing. It is immoral at its core.

Conspicuously absent from the list was Rahm Emanuel, the former Democratic Obama-buddy and failed Chicago mayor, whom Sanders condemned during the 2016 presidential campaign.

"I want to thank Rahm Emanuel for not endorsing me," Sanders wrote at the time. "I don’t want the endorsement of a mayor shutting down schools and firing teachers."

Sanders actually wants to pay "awl teachas sixty-thousand dollahs," and use American taxpayer money to pay for it.

Sanders' anti-endorsements were posted to his campaign website, and they began with a headlining quote from far-left President Franklin D. Roosevelt: “I ask you to judge me by the enemies I have made."

And Sanders has made his share of enemies starting with the leaders of the commune who had to fire him years ago for not doing his "fair share" of the work. And speaking of teachers, there's the college his wife headed that failed and she allegedly lied about the needed funding, which created legal enemies for the Sanders clan.

In an accompanying statement, Sanders threw in some fiery rhetoric of his own.

“You can tell who is truly fighting for working families by the enemies they make, and we've made a lot of enemies,” Sanders said truthfully, because nobody likes a lazy communist who wants you to pay them for being alive. “We understand that nothing will fundamentally change for working Americans unless we have the guts to take on the most powerful corporate interests in this country. [By "take on the most powerful corporate interests" he means, 'to have government take over corporations and all businesses and make him the leader.] "Therefore, it should come as no surprise that corporate CEOs and billionaires have united against our takeover movement. These people have a vested interest in preserving the status quo so they can keep their grip on power and continue to exploit working people across America [instead of allowing me the opportunity]. We welcome their hatred.” [Bracketed text are my thoughts.]



Walt Disney Company Chairman and CEO Bob Iger was named to Sanders' anti-endorsement list.

"While Kenneth Langone has a net worth of $3.7 billion, Home Depot pays wages so low that many of its workers are forced to rely on food stamps, Medicaid and public housing subsidized by U.S. taxpayers," read one blurb on the anti-endorsement list. 

"Today, cashiers at Home Depot make as little as $9 an hour -- the very definition of a starvation wage." [But it's a wage that workers agreed to, and is a wage that doesn't really reflect the average wage of the company. Often the people making that wage are new employees or retirees wanting to remain in the workforce.]

Sanders, briefly the Democrat presidential frontrunner, has trailed former Vice President Joe Biden in fundraising and polling since Biden's entrance into the race. Apparently, normal Americans realize that his promises are on par with the "you can keep your doctor" promise made by another Democrat several years ago.

In a related bit of business, Sander, Independent senator from Vermont, on Tuesday criticized liberal mega-donor Tom Steyer's decision to throw his hat in the ring for the 2020 presidential election.


"I like Tom personally," Sanders told MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell. "But I do have to say as somebody who in this campaign has received two million campaign contributions, averaging I believe $19 a person, I am a bit tired of seeing billionaires trying to buy political power."

Earlier this year, Sanders sparred with progressive activist groups that pointed out that he has since largely dropped his criticisms of "millionaires and billionaires," opting instead to single out "billionaires" only -- ever since Sanders himself became a millionaire, because he is a hypocritical leftist hack.

Sanders has released tax returns showing that he and his wife paid a 26 percent effective tax rate on $561,293 in income, and made more than $1 million in both 2016 and 2017. Sanders donated only $10,600 to charity in 2016 and $36,300 in 2017, the records showed, followed by nearly $19,000 in 2018.

Those relatively minimal charitable contributions led critics on both sides of the aisle to accuse him of hypocrisy. But Joe Biden gave far less than even Sanders gave.

"People like Sanders ... would have more credibility if they didn’t engage in such hypocritical practices, condemning the big, bad rich people whose greed they want to harness for their own allegedly benevolent bidding," Liz Wolfe wrote in The Federalist.

If you enjoyed this post, consider following my blog, but even if you choose not to do so, please check out the sponsors on this page.

Tweet

Stolen Valor thief Blumenthal slams Barr for 'unfounded, irresponsible claims' of spying

I cannot emphasize enough my distaste for people who claim to be war heroes. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) is one such lying piece of trash.


On Wednesday, Blumenthal hypocritically attacked U.S. Attorney General
William Barr, moralizing that Barr “must retract his unfounded, irresponsible claim that American law enforcement ‘spied’ on the Trump Campaign.” At least Trump didn't claim to be a Vietnam veteran.

The phony senator went on, “As Barr admitted, there is absolutely no evidence that our nation’s own law enforcement officers did anything unlawful during their investigation into Russian meddling in our democracy. To recklessly suggest otherwise is deeply offensive.”

It's quite clear that the left has lost interest in pursuing the origins of the spying in 2016 and they are running scared and attacking Barr, who is simply telling the truth: spying took place beginning with Carter Page, and all we want to do is get to the bottom of it.

Blumenthal, who should have had the insight to keep his lying mouth shut, instead said:

“I’m deeply disappointed AG Barr has so demeaned himself & DOJ by carelessly acting as a mouthpiece for Trump’s conspiracy theories. This language has a real, measurable impact on the lives & safety of our men & women in law enforcement. He owes them a retraction & an apology.”

Sean Davis of The Federalist noted:

“Are you referring to foreign spy and dossier author Christopher Steele, who was funded by Hillary and the DNC? Because he worked on behalf of a sanctioned Russian oligarch and colluded with Kremlin officials during the campaign.”

Brit Hume of Fox News also replied:

“This is the last man on earth who ought to be complaining about unfounded and irresponsible claims given his innumerable such claims about Trump and Russia collusion.”

Hume graciously didn't mention Blumenthal's Vietnam war claims.

In February 2017, Fox News outlined Blumenthal’s shady record concerning his Vietnam claims, reporting:

Blumenthal received five deferments, from 1965-1970, before enlisting in the Marine Corps Reserve, though he was never sent out of the U.S. During his six years in the Reserve, Blumenthal was stationed in Washington, focusing on a slew of local projects, such as a Toys for Tots drive. During his political career, however, Blumenthal frequently walked a precarious line, often framing his service just ambiguously enough to give the impression that he had spent time fighting in Vietnam.

“I served during the Vietnam era,” Blumenthal said in 2008. “I remember the taunts, the insults, sometimes even physical abuse.” He told a gathering of families who were expressing support for returning American troops in 2003 that, “when we returned, we saw nothing like this.” Blumenthal, however, crossed the line with stolen valor when speaking to a group of veterans in March 2008: “We have learned something important since the days that I served in Vietnam,” he said.

In May 2017, Blumenthal stated on CNN’s 'New Day':

"What we have now is really a looming constitutional crisis that is deadly serious because there is an investigation ongoing. Ultimately, there may be subpoenas to the President of the United States, just as occurred in 1973 precipitating United States versus Nixon and a similar firing of a special prosecutor. So what's needed now is, in fact, an independent counsel and special prosecutor."

President Trump fired back on Twitter:

"Watching Senator Richard Blumenthal speak of Comey is a joke. ‘Richie’ devised one of the greatest military frauds in U.S. history. For years, as a pol in Connecticut, Blumenthal would talk of his great bravery and conquests in Vietnam — except he was never there. When caught, he cried like a baby and begged for forgiveness, and now he is judge & jury. He should be the one who is investigated for his acts."

Trump tends to speak in exaggerated hyperbole, but he's correct about "Richie." The fact that Blumenthal is a respected mouthpiece for the left should tell you everything you need to know about the left. When you see their mouths move, you know they're lying.


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.






Tweet

Dem. congresswoman implores G-d to get Republicans to stop interfering with infanticide

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) is angry and exasperated over the fact that Republicans continue to push for a vote on a bill to stop killing babies, and she called upon her personal relationship with the Creator: “Oh, my G-d. They just will not quit. . . I think politically, it’s a really bad move for them, and substantively, it’s a disaster.”

That doesn't seem to be a really good look for her.

As LifeNews reported, Democrats, led by Nancy "Dancing Hands" Pelosi, have blocked a bill a total of 28 times that would protect babies who are born alive after abortions and provide them with appropriate medical care and treatment rather than doing nothing so that they can die a painful death.

Earlier this week, Republicans led an effort to to get petition signatures for a discharge petition to bring the bill to the floor.

Politico has predictably provided cover for Democrats. The left is desperately trying to avoid a vote on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, because it would show their true colors, their true disregard for babies over votes. Republicans are trying to bring the bill to a floor vote via a discharge petition.

The Federalist columnist Melanie Zanona writes, “House Republicans on Tuesday launched a long-shot bid to force a vote on anti-abortion legislation — an issue they plan to hammer vulnerable Democrats on even if they can’t secure action on the floor.”

The desperation of this statement is almost palpable. Pushing the issue is anything but a bad move for Republicans and a great move for some future Americans who survived the efforts of abortion doctors to kill them.

SIGN THE PETITION: Stop Infanticide! Stop Abortions Up to Birth!

The federalist author puts things into perspective for Rep. Schakowsky:

This purpose of this bill is not to limit the abortion entitlement, however. As freshman Rep. Dan Crenshaw of Texas put it: 

What this bill says is during an attempted abortion, and the baby is actually born alive, should the doctor actually save it? Now the next question you might ask is, why are we doing this? Is this a question that actually needs answering? Well no actually, because of policies proposed in Virginia and New York and Vermont, we feel that we actually have to put this into law. We actually have to put into law that a baby born with ten fingers and ten toes and a heartbeat, a baby that is breathing, deserves to live because it has value, because it is a human life.

While this bill does not directly threaten the legality of abortion whatsoever, the misinformation should still be addressed, because the truth leads to startlingly ugly conclusion about the motivations of Democrats in opposing the bill—and those do have to do with abortion.

The blocking of a vote on a bill to stop infanticide, and clearly that's what it is, comes even as national polling shows Americans — including people who are “pro-choice” on abortion — oppose abortion up to birth and infanticide.

Most Americans reject abortion the day before a child is born (80%), abortion in the third trimester (79%), and removing medical care for a viable child after birth (82%).

If Schakowsky, Pelosi and Democrats think the best political move is to stand with the 18 percent of soulless Americans who think denying newborn infants medical care is a good thing, Republicans and pro-life advocates won’t stand in her way.

But oh, my G-d, how can Democrats who support infanticide live with themselves?


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.





Tweet

CAIR leader blames Americans for jihad attacks

They never point their bloody fingers inward, only outward. Blaming the victims of their evil attacks. They've been blaming their victims since Mohammad told Omar to go out and lie in order to kill someone who said something negative about him.


According to Hussam Ayloush in a CNN interview, we Americans bear some of the blame for the wave of Islamic extremism causing the terror attack in San Bernadino last Wednesday. 

Yes, America, it's all your fault. You made us kill you because, well, we don't like the way you refuse to do what we demand.

Why we give these CAIR dirtbags a national voice is beyond all comprehension. Wait, I almost forgot, it's CNN, aka Certainly Not News. 

CAIR, as you probably know, is an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). The MB is a known terrorist organization that our president refuses to acknowledge and even has them over at the White House for tea and crumpets. (See Holy Land Foundation trials for more information on CAIR and the MB).

Ayloush said that American foreign policy has helped fuel the rage that drives Muslim radicals to kill in the name of their faith. Perhaps it would be more accurate for the scumcrumpet to have admitted that it's jihad itself that is doing the driving.

"Let's not forget that some of our own foreign policy, as Americans, as the West, have fueled that extremism," Ayloush told "New Day" host Chris Cuomo, a hard-line liberal who cannot even understand how a photographer's religious beliefs would be violated if he were forced to work a same-sex wedding. "After all, it's not like the photographer is being asked to marry another man. In an article in The Federalist, Cuomo comes across as an asshat when trying to trip up Marco Rubio on the abortion issue.

But getting back to Ayloush; he said that U.S. support for repressive regimes in the Middle East, including Egypt, "push people over to the edge."

"Then they become extremists. We are partly responsible. Terrorism is a global problem, not a Muslim problem. And the solution has to be global. Everyone has a role in it," added Ayloush, making full use of Taqiyya, or the act of lying for the benefit of Islam.

When Ayloush says "we" he is pretending to be an actual American is spirit. That's a load of camel excrement--he sees himself as a Muslim first and an American last--even after Lebanon, his country of origin.

Cuomo didn't challenge him on the claim that American foreign policy triggered terrorism, but that's probably what Cuomo believes as well. He apparently isn't the brightest light on the "holiday trees." (Of course I mean Christmas tree.)

The Daniel Pipes Middle East Forum had an interesting comment submitted by David Campbell back in September 2006, where he discussed how he had been corresponding via email with Ayloush and believes he and his CAIR soulmates are in "a constant state of denial," as CAIR calls the U.S. government the "New Saddam."

It's about time we stop giving credence to these haters of the West. Since 9/11 we should know better, we should know who they really are. Not that CNN ever will until it bites them on their butt.


Tweet