Paramedic who forced partner to take abortion drugs gets slammer time

A Scottish paramedic was sentenced to 10 years and six months in prison for sexually assaulting his pregnant lover by secretly injecting her with abortion drugs, killing their unborn baby."Stephen Doohan, a former clinical team leader with the Scottish Ambulance Service, was convicted of assaulting and sexually assaulting the pregnant woman," said the report. "He was also placed on the sex offenders register and made subject to a non-harassment order preventing him from contacting the victim indefinitely."

Doohan met the woman while on a vacation in Ibiza. The pair continued to meet around once a month.

"After she informed him of her positive pregnancy test and identified him as the father, they agreed to keep the baby following her visit to Edinburgh, where he had separated from his wife.""In March 2023, while they were intimate, Doohan penetrated the woman’s vagina without her consent and inserted a syringe containing the abortion drug misoprostol, which he had researched using his workplace account," the account continued. "The woman said she 'felt something hard' being pushed into her and assumed it was a sex toy."

"The next day, a white substance began to come out of her vagina and she experienced stomach cramps."

"Two days later, he repeated the assault, placing more of the drug in her vagina in similar circumstances."

"When confronted, Doohan initially denied his actions before admitting them. He warned her that he would be arrested if she told anyone, and the pair rehearsed explanations for the miscarriage."

"The woman later fell unconscious after taking a shower and experienced heavier bleeding. She was taken to the hospital, where she was told the abortion drug was killing the baby."

"Procurator fiscal Fiona Kirkby said Doohan’s 'calculated and heinous actions caused the loss of the victim’s pregnancy, robbing her of plans she had for the future.' She added that he has now been held accountable for this 'fundamental breach of trust.'"

"A Health & Care Professions Tribunal Service panel struck Doohan off the medical register, ruling that he 'planned an illegal abortion by using unauthorized access to medical information via his workplace.' The panel said he 'deliberately and intentionally sexually assaulted' the woman 'to abort their unborn child' and 'later attempted to persuade her to take the blame for the illegal abortion.'"

"His actions caused the victim 'not only physical harm but also ongoing emotional and psychological harm,' leaving her with the 'anguish' of her miscarriage and his 'breach of trust.'""This case highlights the vulnerability of unborn children and the risks women face when abusers exploit chemical abortion drugs to kill the baby against the mother’s wishes."

"In a separate case illustrating the same pattern of coercion, one woman described feeling 'trapped and terrified' after her boyfriend forced her to take abortion pills."

"She said: 'If there was an in-person doctor’s visit when I was going through my situation, I would have been able to at least have one scapegoat to go to, and tell them, I do not want an abortion. I’m getting coerced into this. I need help. But I did not have that opportunity.'"

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. You can support my work by checking out the sponsors on this page. It really helps. You can even click on Buy Me A Coffee in the sidebar if you want to show your appreciation. It helps to keep me going, but really, there's  no pressure.

Tweet

Man denied giving blood for refusing to answer if he was pregnant

Has never been pregnant and never will

Inclusion is a double-edged sword: if, for example, it means allowing people of all religions, races and ethnic backgrounds into the same club, it's a good thing. If it means having to deny the reality that men and women are different biologically, then it is quite the opposite. 

Imagine a male mixed martial arts fighter who claims to identify as a woman, let's call him Fallon Fox, fight a woman in the cage, let's call her Tamikka Brents. The fight ended up with Fox breaking Brents' skull. That was last year.

Fallon Fox cannot have babies

Men are not women and women are not men.

Recently, Leslie Sinclair, a 66-year-old Scottish man, was not allowed to donate blood because he was required to answer a question on the donation center's form asking whether or not HE was pregnant. 

Sinclair, from Stirling, in central Scotland, was a regular blood donor and had given about 125 pints of blood over the past 50 years until he was barred during a trip last Wednesday amid a drive for new donors, the Daily Mail reported. 

He was told to complete the form asking whether he was currently with child or had been pregnant in the last six months, which he replied that the question did not apply to him [BECAUSE HE IS A MAN AND CANNOT GET PREGNANT!] 

Even if he was a woman, he would still be too old to get pregnant, but he isn't a woman.

“I am angry because I have been giving blood since I was 18 and have regularly gone along,” Mr. Sinclair told the outlet Friday. “I’m very happy to do so without any problem.”

Sinclair told a staffer at the Albert Halls clinic in Stirling it was “impossible” for him to be pregnant, but soon learned that he needed to answer the query in order to give blood. He now has no plans on returning to the donation center because they are freaking idiots.

“I told them that was stupid and that if I had to leave, I wouldn’t be back,” Sinclair said. “And that was it, I got on my bike and cycled away.” [By the way, he rides a 'boy's' bike.]

Sinclair said he was angered since “vulnerable people,” including children, are in desperate need of donations.

“But they’ve been denied my blood because of the obligation to answer a question that can’t possibly be answered,” Sinclair told Daily Mail.

Sure he could have answered it if he wanted to give in to the stupidity of the question due to his gender and even his age. But Sinclair stood his ground and refused to bow to the LGBTQ choir, some of whom sing in falsetto.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

If everyone took their cue from Leslie Sinclair and refused to participate in the madness of the woke, then women would refuse to compete against men in the MMA cages; women would remain on the starting platforms when the gun goes off at swimming competitions while men in women's swimsuits break women's records, and women weightlifters would refuse to participate in the events if men are allowed to compete against them, no matter what gender these men say they are.

Wake up and don't be woke.

Tweet

Scotland may pardon women executed as witches 400 years ago: it's too late

Scotland is considering pardoning people who were executed as witches 400 years ago. That's too late--if the Scots had only left them alone, they'd still be alive today.

The Daily Wire reported the story explaining that the witch trials in Scotland was based on a power struggle between the Roman Catholic Church and the aristocracy.

According to The Wall Street Journal:

In all, until the Witchcraft Act was repealed in 1735, some 3,837 people were accused of the crime — the overwhelming majority of them women — with some two-thirds executed, more per head of population than anywhere else in Europe…

In some instances, people accused their neighbors of the crime to settle scores. Much of the Scottish aristocracy threw their weight behind the purges, hoping they would speed the decline of the Catholic Church and allow them to pick from its landholdings, say academics who studied the phenomenon.

Others, including King James, believed in witches and developed what they thought were scientific methods to detect them, such as pricking them with long needles to see how much they bled. If there wasn’t enough blood, it was held as a sure sign that the accused was a witch.

The way accusations were used back in Scotland seems similar to the way that claims of blasphemy is still used today in Islamic countries in order to get rid of people who people want to be rid of. 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

And let's not forget how self-described witches in the United States repeatedly went against President Trump during the Mueller investigation in 2018.

Today, the New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) is trying to find criminality in Trump's business dealings. She has a person and is looking for a crime--that's a witch hunt.

Tweet

UK dropping support for Palestinian Authority

An internal memo released through a Freedom of Information (FOIA) request shows the British government's stated support for the terrorist supporting group known as the Palestinian Authority and Palestinian state-building has been quietly dropped over the past year.

Changes on a Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) memo from this week show the UK government no longer refers to itself as "a strong supporter" of the PA's state-building efforts and that the UK no longer claims that the PA "has the capability to run an effective, inclusive, accountable state."

The memo was sent to Scottish officials on January 17, 2020 from an Israel Desk officer at the FCO’s Near East Department in Whitehall in response to Scottish officials asking whether Westminster’s “commitment to prevent public institutions from imposing their own international boycotts” that was announced on December 19, 2019  also applied north of the border.

So it's beginning to look as if the UK finally recognizes the PA as who they really are--the mask has been removed, and I'm not making a Wuhan coronavirus reference.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Show and tell: Dublin and Glasgow

So I'm back from Dublin and Glasgow. We went for a wedding in Ireland, stayed at the Bloom's Hotel and then we visited my wife's sister in Scotland.

I haven't been out of the country in a while and to tell you the truth, I was apprehensive about all the luggage we were carrying. I thought it might be a bit much, but it turned out just fine and we were met by friends at the airport.

We heard that Trump was going to be in the UK while we were there, but he went to England while we stayed in Dublin.

The pubs were fantastic although my wife doesn't drink, but I took a bunch of pictures and will share a few of them below.

Bloom's Hotel

It seemed as if everybody in Ireland smokes and loves Guinness. We went by the factory that makes the brew--it's a huge industrial complex.

I shot about 1250 photos in the nine days since we left the homeland and will be editing them over the next few days.

Once we got to Glasgow, we were taken on a city tour by my wife's niece. We visited Glasgow University (where she got a PhD in neuroscience) and naturally, we went shopping and toured the area around the city.

This cutie was given some coins by her momma to put in the guitar case of a busker and his young singing partner. This was taken in Glasgow Center (they spell it 'Centre') and there was a large crowd gathered round listening to the tunes.






Below is the photo of the buskers. They were really quite talented.

But my favorite music of all was the harpist at the wedding. Her name is Tina Mulrooney and she is fabulous.

 If you like the soothing sounds of the harp along with beautiful accompanying instrumentation and a voice that is an incredible gift, you need to check her out. She has tunes on YouTube.

The father of the bride is my wife's friend from India. He told us that Mulrooney was hired just to play for the ceremony, lasting about thirty minutes, but she liked the wedding guests so much, she came up to the roof of the hotel [it took place at the Marker Hotel--another fantastic five star place] and stayed for well over an hour beyond her time.

In fact, she saw that I enjoyed her playing and singing [I told her she plays better than Patrick Ball and sings like an angel] that she gave me a CD of her album.

Anyway, we're back and I finally made it to the gym and have a lot to make up to my body.


Tweet

Glasgow church service uses Koran reading

Scotland is doomed. 

When passages from the Quran that explicitly refutes the divinity of Jesus is read in Arabic from the lectern during an Epiphany service in a Scottish cathedral, a service which celebrates the arrival of three kings bearing witness to the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem, something is terribly wrong.

To have the passages from Islamic scripture read as part of the service is obscene to religious Christians, particularly those that clearly reject the divinity of Jesus at a ceremony during a festival that Christians believe marks the revelation of Christ's divinity to the world.

The church has since receive over 10,000 messages from angry Christians outraged by this outrageous occurrence. 

"Christians should know what their fellow citizens believe and this can include reading the Quran for themselves, whether in the original or in translation," the Right Rev. Michael Nazir Ali, the former Bishop of Rochester told the BBC regarding the reading. "This is not, however, the same thing as having it read in church in the context of public worship. The authorities of the Scottish Episcopal Church should immediately repudiate this ill-advised invitation and exercise appropriate discipline for those involved."

If it had been a mosque, instead of a Christian church, and Allah or Muhammad were rejected by a reading therein, heads would roll.

The dhimmie who organized the event, the Not Very Rev. Kelvin  Holdsworth, said they received so many threatening messages that they were forced to call the police. [Better them than the Taliban.]

Holdsworth hit back saying the church had been involved in a number of different interfaith events in the past and that Quran readings have been conducted at the church in the past without incident. But he didn't say which verses were read and by whom.

Holdsworth also did not say whether he would attempt to get his church to do a reading of the Bible at a local mosque, but spreading the word of the Bible doesn't appear to be a big priority for the dhimmie.

He then went on to use the Muslim Brotherhood invented term 'Islamophobic,' and blame the 'far-right media' for the problem.

Since Christianity has been around longer than Islam (although Muslims lie and say that Islam has always existed, but it was just practiced the wrong way until Mohammed came around) it should be Muslims who get to hear the Not So Very Rev. Holdsworth preach to them.

Somehow, I don't see that ever going to happen. 



Tweet

Brexit liberals: sore losers wanting a do-over

Thursday's UK referendum on their membership in the European Union (EU) blew a lot of minds. They voted to leave the EU by a slim margin of 1.2 million votes of the 33 million that were cast. 

Voters in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Gibraltar voted to "Leave" and get back to their British roots, as it were.

But the losing side (not the side Donald Trump lauded) are sore losers, having signed an 'easier-than-going-to-the-polling-place-online-vote' for a "do-over" because things didn't go their way. One sore loser lawmaker actually said that Parliament should overturn the result because he wanted to stay. 

Had the vote gone the other way, this same lawmaker would scream that anyone who wanted to overturn the results (that he wanted) should be forced to resign as he or she refused to obey the democratic process "that is the very backbone of our great nation."

Not so ironically, those who wanted to "Remain" tended to be young liberals. Unfortunately for them, many preferred to remain in their parents' basement rather than partake in the voting process.

The results revealed another interesting fact as well. 

In heavily populated areas with large Muslim enclaves, the vote was largely to "Remain." London and Scotland (particularly Glasgow with its large Muslim population) voted overwhelmingly to "Remain."

Perhaps that's why London is often called "Londonistan."

The sore loser petition had 2,374,547 signatures proposing a new "rule" stating that if the "Remain" or "Leave" camps won less than 60 percent of the vote with less than 75 percent turnout "there should be another referendum."

This "rule" is particularly aimed at liberals who thought they were going to win and now realize that they actually have to get off their duffs and vote. Had the petition required them to go to a polling place, the same result would have likely resulted.

Whoever said liberals aren't lazy?

It just so happens that the referendum vote was the largest turnout since 1992 at 72 percent, proving once again that liberals can't handle responsibility and need to depend upon the government.

Since 2001, the highest voter turnout in a general election has been only 61 percent, but liberals pretend that 75 percent is a normal figure.

Where is democracy when you really need it?


Tweet