University of Oklahoma Boots Woke TA After She Zeros Christian Student for Daring to Cite the Bible

Samantha Fulnecky reads her Bible

Folks, another day, another episode in the ongoing war on Christianity in America's so-called "higher education" system. This time, it's the University of Oklahoma, where a graduate teaching assistant got the boot after slapping a big fat zero on a student's paper, just because the student quoted Scripture while pushing back on the radical gender nonsense being shoved down everyone's throats.

Samantha Fulnecky, a junior at OU, got hammered with a zero out of 25 on an assignment about gender norms. The young lady had the audacity to reference the Bible in her response to some scholarly article on how kids get bullied for not conforming to the latest leftist gender theories. So the result of her essay came full circle and she got bullied by the Teacher's ASSistant.

The TA in question, William "Mel" Curth, who goes by she/they pronouns, couldn't handle it. Curth doled out the failing grade, complete with a lecture on how science supposedly proves there are more than two genders.

"Please note that I am not deducting points because you have certain beliefs, but instead I am deducting point [sic] for you posting a reaction paper that does not answer the questions for this assignment, contradicts itself, heavily uses personal ideology over empirical evidence in a scientific class, and is at times offensive," Curth's explanation for the grade said. 

Curth said the concept of only two sexes is not backed by science, which anyone with even a brain knows is balderdash.

"You may personally disagree with this, but that doesn't change the fact that every major psychological, medical, pediatric, and psychiatric association in the United States acknowledges that, biologically and psychologically, sex and gender is neither binary nor fixed," Curth bloviated. The graduate teaching assistant also called the student's essay "highly offensive." 

Fulnecky wasn't buying the excuse and saw right through it.

"I definitely think that I was being punished for what I believe because I very clearly stated in my essay in my response to the article, I very clearly stated my beliefs and stated what, not just my beliefs, but what the Bible and what God says about gender and about those roles," Fulnecky told Fox News Digital amid the uproar.

In her essay, Fulnecky laid it out plain and simple, celebrating God's design for men and women instead of apologizing for it.

"Gender roles and tendencies should not be considered 'stereotypes,'" she wrote in her essay. "Women naturally want to do womanly things because God created us with those womanly desires in our hearts. The same goes for men. God created men in the image of His courage and strength, and He created women in the image of His beauty. He intentionally created women differently than men and we should live our lives with that in mind." She even called the push for nonbinary insanity what it is: "demonic." [I would call it nihilistic.]

After the story blew up, thanks to conservative outrage and viral posts, the university investigated. Curth got put on leave, and now, finally, OU has shown her the door.

"Based on an examination of the graduate teaching assistant's prior grading standards and patterns, as well as the graduate teaching assistant's own statements related to this matter, it was determined that the graduate teaching assistant was arbitrary in the grading of this specific paper," the state's flagship school said in a Monday evening statement. "The graduate teaching assistant will no longer have instructional duties at the University." 

They are gone, she is.

They even restored Fulnecky's grade [not to be confused with the 'they' whose pronouns actually do confuse normal people] and made sure the assignment didn't tank her GPA. 

The university patted itself on the back in the end: "The University of Oklahoma believes strongly in both its faculty's rights to teach with academic freedom and integrity and its students' right to receive an education that is free from a lecturer's impermissible evaluative standards. We are committed to teaching students how to think, not what to think. The University will continue to review best practices to ensure that its instructors have the comprehensive training necessary to objectively assess their students' work without limiting their ability to teach, inspire, and elevate our next generation."

Look, this is a win for religious liberty and free speech on campus, a rare one these days. But it shouldn't have taken a massive public backlash for OU to do the right thing. How many more Christian students are getting targeted by activist TAs pushing this gender cult agenda without anyone noticing?

Kudos to Samantha Fulnecky for standing firm. In a sea of woke indoctrination, she's a reminder that not everyone's buying the lies.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work and my coffee drinking habit. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you from doing me that solid. Imagine, you could be the first on your block to do that and your friends will thank you . . . for some reason. MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL MY CHRISTIAN READERS, AND HAPPY CHANUKAH TO MY JEWISH READERS, AND HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL!

Man denied giving blood for refusing to answer if he was pregnant

Has never been pregnant and never will

Inclusion is a double-edged sword: if, for example, it means allowing people of all religions, races and ethnic backgrounds into the same club, it's a good thing. If it means having to deny the reality that men and women are different biologically, then it is quite the opposite. 

Imagine a male mixed martial arts fighter who claims to identify as a woman, let's call him Fallon Fox, fight a woman in the cage, let's call her Tamikka Brents. The fight ended up with Fox breaking Brents' skull. That was last year.

Fallon Fox cannot have babies

Men are not women and women are not men.

Recently, Leslie Sinclair, a 66-year-old Scottish man, was not allowed to donate blood because he was required to answer a question on the donation center's form asking whether or not HE was pregnant. 

Sinclair, from Stirling, in central Scotland, was a regular blood donor and had given about 125 pints of blood over the past 50 years until he was barred during a trip last Wednesday amid a drive for new donors, the Daily Mail reported. 

He was told to complete the form asking whether he was currently with child or had been pregnant in the last six months, which he replied that the question did not apply to him [BECAUSE HE IS A MAN AND CANNOT GET PREGNANT!] 

Even if he was a woman, he would still be too old to get pregnant, but he isn't a woman.

“I am angry because I have been giving blood since I was 18 and have regularly gone along,” Mr. Sinclair told the outlet Friday. “I’m very happy to do so without any problem.”

Sinclair told a staffer at the Albert Halls clinic in Stirling it was “impossible” for him to be pregnant, but soon learned that he needed to answer the query in order to give blood. He now has no plans on returning to the donation center because they are freaking idiots.

“I told them that was stupid and that if I had to leave, I wouldn’t be back,” Sinclair said. “And that was it, I got on my bike and cycled away.” [By the way, he rides a 'boy's' bike.]

Sinclair said he was angered since “vulnerable people,” including children, are in desperate need of donations.

“But they’ve been denied my blood because of the obligation to answer a question that can’t possibly be answered,” Sinclair told Daily Mail.

Sure he could have answered it if he wanted to give in to the stupidity of the question due to his gender and even his age. But Sinclair stood his ground and refused to bow to the LGBTQ choir, some of whom sing in falsetto.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

If everyone took their cue from Leslie Sinclair and refused to participate in the madness of the woke, then women would refuse to compete against men in the MMA cages; women would remain on the starting platforms when the gun goes off at swimming competitions while men in women's swimsuits break women's records, and women weightlifters would refuse to participate in the events if men are allowed to compete against them, no matter what gender these men say they are.

Wake up and don't be woke.

Tweet

Parents sue school: say they encourage their kids to use new names, pronouns without consent

Bill Bennett

Parents in the Ludlow Public School district in Massachusetts are taking their children's school to court after they discovered the children at the school are being encouraged by teachers to change their pronouns and names without telling their parents.

Former Education Secretary Bill Bennett describes gender identity lessons as 'quackery' and warns voters about the significance of education in the midterm elections.

Parents Stephen Foote and Marissa Silvestri say their child was encouraged by Ludlow Public School officials to use a new name and different gender pronouns. Other parents such as Sandra Salmeron and Jonathan Feliciano also allege the school's policies to keep this information from the parents about their child's gender identity and say this violates their parental and religious rights, which it obviously does.

"[The Ludlow School Committee and implicated educators] exceeded the bounds of legitimate pedagogical concerns and usurped the role of [the plaintiffs] and other parents in the Town of Ludlow to direct the education and upbringing of their children, make medical and mental health decisions for their children and to promote and preserve family privacy and integrity," the lawsuit alleges.

"Defendants’ protocol and practice of concealing from parents information related to their children’s gender identity and efforts to affirm a discordant student gender identity at school violates parents’ fundamental rights under the United States and Massachusetts constitutions and violates children’s reciprocal rights to the care and custody of their parents, familial privacy and integrity."

The lawsuit, prepared and filed by the Massachusetts Family Institute and the Child and Parental Rights Campaign, carves out specific complaints on behalf of Feliciano and Salmeron, who base their lawsuit on religious freedom, stating: "]A]s to plaintiffs Jonathan Feliciano and Sandra Salmeron, it also violates their fundamental right to free exercise of religion under the United States and Massachusetts constitutions."

"We want to support our students the best we can," Ludlow School Committee Chair James Harrington told state news outlet MassLive. "But we should bring parents to the table and hope they respond in a loving and supportive way as well."

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

Harrington has the audacity to say that he "hopes" parents respond in a loving and supportive way. The reason they're responding to the schools in the first place is because they are the people who love their children the most and the ones who gave them their names and biologically assigned them their gender. 

The school officials know nothing little to nothing about these children because they are operating on critical race theory bullshit, not out of individual love for these kids.

The case is set to go before a federal court and if the parents should somehow lose, the country is doomed.

Anyway, have a wonderful, blessed Easter.

Tweet

Brooke Baldwin "Highest Paid" socialist anchor exits Comedy News Network

Another rich victim speaks out

Brooke Baldwin who identifies as a woman in spite of all the choices she is offered by her side of the aisle, complained about the gender differences at CNN, where she worked for 13 years as an extremely bias reporter. She explained that all the "most influential" primetime leftists at the network have penises and identify as actual men, except perhaps for Don LeMon who identifies as Chris "Fredo" Cuomo's bestest buddy, no two ways about it.

Baldwin, 41, appeared on an episode of Ms. Magazine‘s On The Issues With Michele Goodwin podcast to discuss her career and how clear it is to her that there’s a lack of women in the “most influential” positions. 

[There is also a lack of women in men's track and field, the NFL, NBA, NHL and MMA, just for starters.]

“I’ve been anchoring for 10-plus years, the majority of that time two hours in the afternoon. And in that time, you know, the most influential anchors on our network [and] the highest-paid, are men,” she said on the podcast, not wanting to add the extra 3 years she worked at the network because that would add 3 extra years to the embarrassment of working for them.

“My bosses, my executives are men. The person who oversees CNN Dayside is a man, and my executive producer for 10 years is a man. So, I have been surrounded by a lot of men.” 

Men, men everywhere and not a woman to think.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Rep. Emanuel Cleaver concludes prayer with a display of his woke cluelessness

A Democrat in Congress on Sunday showed us how stupid, albeit woke, he is. In his opening prayer for the 117th Congress, he concluded with the phrase, "Amen and Awoman," proving his lack of knowledge regarding the words that come out of his mouth.

Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D) led the opening prayer. He is also a pastor at St. James United Methodist Church of Kansas City, Missouri, which should be a cause for embarrassment to anyone attending his church.

Cleaver's prayer to “The God known by many names and faith,” concluded with, “Amen and Awomen,” obviously, and ignorantly, ascribing gender to the traditional “Amen” conclusion of a prayer.

The word Amen comes from the Greek and Hebrew and is used by Christians and Jews in prayer. 

Amen means “truly” or “it is so” and has nothing to do with gender. It isn't a man, or men, but is more like, "Yep, that's the truth." Any pastor should know that, and if he or she actually did but used it in a gendered way, should be ashamed to call him- or herself a pastor, much less a Christian or Jew.

Reverend Rep. Cleaver also shared a video of his prayer on social media which, due to his lack of knowledge, did not embarrass him.

I was honored to deliver the opening prayer for the 117th Congress. May God bless each and every Representative with the courage and wisdom to defend our democracy and the liberties we all hold so dearly. https://t.co/z3vkWOk7lc

— Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (@repcleaver) January 3, 2021

Seriously, the guy is a dummy, and some ridiculed him on social media:

.How dumb are these people?
They think ”amen” is a gendered word.
“Amen and Awomen." pic.twitter.com/pweNiIiQA5
— Breanna Morello 🇺🇸 (@breannamorello) January 3, 2021

 ComedianLarry the Cable guy weighed in on the blatant stupidity.

Congress today did a prayer and finished it with “amen” AND “a woman” to be gender equal. Are they really that dumb. Amen is Latin/Hebrew for “Truly” or “So be it”? It has nothing to do with Gender. These people are complete idiots. Ex: “God is great.” “Amen” (truly) duh!

— Larry The Cable Guy (@GitRDoneLarry) January 3, 2021

The Democrats are losing their collective mind over wokeness to the point where we may need to start changing or adding words:

menstruation becomes womenstruation

meningitis becomes womangitis 

menses becomes womanses

manual labor becomes womanual labor

manuscript becomes womanuscript

Manhattan becomes Womanhattan

It makes just as much sense to make these changes as to what Cleaver did with the word Amen.

Seriously, liberalism is a mental disorder.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny, no joke. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads and give them a good, hard clicking.

Tweet

UPDATE: Muffet McGraw Notre Dame women's basketball head coach will not hire men

Photo: AP

UPDATE: Notre Dame women's basketball lost to Baylor in the finals and McGraw is now looking for a few good women.

Notre Dame women's basketball head coach, Muffet McGraw, spoke in a recent interview with  Think Progress, and explained her position on why she will never hire another biological male assistant coach. She believes that women can do more to help each other.

Think Progress asked her the question on hiring she emphatically said "no." She has had an all-female staff for the past seven years.

“Women need the opportunity. They deserve the opportunity,” she said.

On Thursday, McGraw was asked about her recent comments.

"Did you know that the Equal Rights Amendment was introduced in 1967 and it still hasn't passed?" she replied. "We need 38 states to agree that discrimination on the basis of sex is unconstitutional. We've had a record number of women running for office and winning, and still we have 23 percent of the House and 25 percent of the Senate."

Well, historically she's a bit off. 

The Equal Rights Amendment designed to guarantee equal rights for all Americans regardless of sex, and sought to end legal distinctions between men and women was introduced to Congress in 1921. It had support from middle-class women but many women of the working class opposed the amendment because it suggested that employed women needed special protection regarding working conditions and employment hours.

With the Women's Movement of the 1960s, ERA gained support and was re-introduced by Rep. Martha Griffiths (D-MI) in 1971. The House approved the amendment in October of that year, and on March 22, 1972, the Senate approved it. Now all the amendment needed was for 38 states to ratify it and "boom," it would be law as specified in Article V of the U.S. Constitution.

But by 1977, the amendment got only 35 of the required 38 state legislature votes to ratify it, and it had bipartisan support.

Phyllis Schlafly mobilized conservative women to oppose the amendment because she believed it would harm women in cases of child custody and alimony support, and it would leave them open for the military draft.

However, it wasn't only conservatives who opposed the amendment. Labor feminists were also against its passage because they too believed it would eliminate the protection of women in the work force.

Five of the 35 states that signed on with the amendment [ID, KY, NE, TN, and SD] voted to revoke their original ratification. 

In fact, in 1960, the Democratic National Committee rejected the proposal after the AFL-CIO, ACLU, the American Federation of Teachers, Americans for Democratic Action, American Nurse's Association, and other equally liberal-minded organizations, were dead set against the amendment.

But to listen to argument in the media, you'd never know that ERA has been opposed by the liberal left, the people who supposedly fight for women's rights.

"Girls are socialized to know when they come out, gender rules are already set. Men run the world. Men have the power. Men make the decisions. It's always the man that is the stronger one,” she said, not taking into account that women are the majority of voters.

This isn't an argument against McGraw hiring only women. That works for both genders and it's understandable from her perspective.

However, to say that women basically don't have equal rights as men simply dismisses the current discrimination laws.

The Equal Pay Act of 1963, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Family and Medical Leave Act and the Family Housing Act have guaranteed people equal rights to all regardless of sex. The main reason that ERA has been difficult to pass is because of actual biological differences between the sexes and the fear of actually losing some of their rights and social outcomes [e.g., child custody].

So, by all means Ms. McGraw, don't hire men if you believe that women understand women's basketball and the players better than men. But please don't have women play the victim--we've got Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for that.

Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Australia's PM knows his science and junk when he sees it

"Yep, it's a guy"

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison is not a science denier. He knows that X and Y chromosomes determine sex--not clothing, not psychology, not delusions nor cosmetic surgery to change the appearance of one's junk.

Morrison has had enough of transgender "nonsense" refusing to bow to pressure by the movement's demands for the government to create "nonbinary" government documents for people with gender identity disorder [aka: transgender people].

Australia's Labour Party released a proposed draft for a "national platform that commits to supporting identification options 'beyond binary male/female' on government documents such as passports."

A finalized platform is to be voted on in December during the party's triennial national party conference.

The proposal referring to transgender folks as "gender-confused Australians," says that they will not attain "equal enjoyment of human rights without discrimination" unless the government gives them 'autonomy regarding sex/gender markers, and obtain identification options that match their sex characteristics and/or gender identities, as preferred."

Morrison is telling the idiots of the Labour Party to "get real" and that the government will "never" cave to their demand.

"A Liberal-National Government will never remove gender from birth certificates, licenses and passports--who are Labour kidding? Get real," Morrison tweeted. "This is the problem with Labour, obsessed with nonsense like removing gender from birth certificates rather than lower electricity prices, reducing tax for hard-working families and small businesses."

The liberals haven't taken Morrison's declaration well, with independent MP and pro-LGBTQRST activist Alex Greenwich telling him [or so he claims] to "focus on being Prime Minister for all Australians [including mentally ill ones], stop spreading misinformation [aka: science] about the gender diverse community, and start uniting rather than dividing Australians." Especially those with delusions of being a gender they are not, or that does not exist in reality.


Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.

Tweet

Illinois judge accepts biology, rejects transgender science denier's request

An Illinois judge denied a mentally ill male who believes he's a female his request to change clothes with actual female students in the girl's locker room at a public high school.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois is representing Nova Maday, the male student at Palatine's Township High School District 211. The ACLU petitioned the court last year, arguing the student should be treated as if he's a girl and not be forced to deal with reality.

On Thursday, Judge Thomas Allen, who evidently got an "A" in biology, rejected the request to go along with Maday's delusion that he's a female. Perhaps the good judge believed it would do the poor young man no good to allow the lie to persist, and to subject high school girls to having to deal with him exposing his junk in the locker room.

The ACLU will consult with Maday on how he wants to proceed with the case.

"Clearly, we are disappointed in this decision. We continue to believe that the school is wrong to discriminate against our client. There is no exception under our nondiscrimination laws that allows a school to treat transgender students differently because of lack of understanding or discomfort about transgender people," said John Knight, LGBTQ policy director at the ACLU.

"To me, this is a simple question--am I going to be treated just like any other girl in my school. All I want is to be accepted by my school for who I am--a girl--and be able to take gym and use the locker room to change clothes like other [actual] girls in my class," Nova Maday said after the judge ruled in favor of reality.

The ACLU cited Illinois Human Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination. But Kellie Fiedorek, an attorney for the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), called it a "baseless" claim.

"That law specifically allows facilities like locker rooms to be reserved for girls, whose desire privacy is both important and understandable, particularly in the post-Weinstein era," Ms. Fiedorek said, referencing Harvey Weinstein, the disgraced notorious scum bag.

The ADF and Thomas More Society represented a group of concerned parents and students who intervened in the lawsuit.

"Schools should never be forced to give male students unrestricted access to areas where girls are changing clothes. Claiming a female gender identity doesn't change that," said Thomas Brejcha, chief counsel at the Thomas More Society.

ADF noted in a press release, that the transgender student continues to be allowed to change in the female locker room, but must do so behind a curtain.

And going along with his mental illness does him no favor. The suicide rate among transgender people, both before and after transition, is around 40 percent. And it has nothing to do with acceptance of the transition.

To help this group of people psychiatry must get involved and we must all stop pretending that biology is not the deciding factor of gender. That somehow a person can magically think he or she is a member of the opposite sex and therefore we must go along with it--this is asking us to lie about what is real, and this is what science denying is all about.

We need to treat people with gender dysmorphic disorder or gender identity disorder and stop pretending that it's other than that.

There was a time when a person who identified with being, say, Napoleon, was institutionalized. Now the ACLU wants us to call him Napoleon or "The Little Corporal," and treat him like the leader of the French armies.


Tweet

Trump and Pentagon may abandon social experiments under Mattis

There may be changes for the military blowin' in the wind. That is, the changes that have already taken place might change back to the way things were before President Obama began his social experiment with gays, men who think they're women, and women who think they're men, joining the military and being special recognition.

Under Obama, the military tried to integrate transgender persons into the ranks of the mentally stable military population that comprise the majority of the troops, and allow women into special operations forces and rid gender-specific words for more "politically correct" leftist terms. 

This was Obama's softer, more gentler side of his military, and it went against our traditional military approach. 

Puke-worthy as well is the fact that some Navy warships were named for civil rights activists.

But what the Obama administration de-emphasized were expressions of Christianity in the ranks--some officers were even disciplined for having visible Bibles or gospel verses in their living quarters. 

At least the same discipline was not meted out to Muslim officers and enlisted men.

There is a good possibility that Trump's choice for secretary of defense, General James "Mad Dog" Mattis, will not make Obama's gay, transgender and politically correct social experimentation agenda a big priority. Mattis isn't looking to have a gentle, softer military; he's looking to have an awesome, powerful one that will keep the peace because unlike under Obama's administration, nobody will want to mess with it.

"Mad Dog" Mattis will bring back the warrior ethos to the Pentagon.

U.S. Army Gen. Jack Keane (ret.) said the emphasis on social reform under Obama came at the expense of the military's core objective.

"Social engineering was a distractor from what the main mission of the United States military was about," said Keane. "We were involved in conflict and war, and these reforms achieved a level of prominence that subordinated the issue of war itself."

Outgoing politically correct DoD Secretary Ash Carter "made it clear" that he won't stand in the way of the incoming administration making their own policy decisions.

Because he can't.

Under Mattis, the issue of women in combat will likely be revisited. Last year, Ash Carter opened land combat jobs in the infantry and special operations to women, and at that time, Mattis said women should not be in combat because, if they were, the nation's enemies wouldn't fear "America's awesome determination to defend herself."

Mattis also said that physical standards for combat jobs would become more lax, and women would not have privacy for their "bodily functions."


Tweet