PC Miss America no longer will be about physical beauty

The Miss America beauty pageant will no longer be about physical appearance and to prove that, they are ditching the swimsuit competition and will refer to the event as the Miss America Competition.

In place of the swimsuit competition, contestants will take part in a live interactive session with the judges and will need to answer tough questions such as: "If you had Donald Trump tied up in a room and knew you'd never get caught, what would you do to him?" And: "Who is worse, ISIS or all men?"

Contestants "will be asked to demonstrate their passion, intelligence and overall understanding of the job of Miss America," said Rachel Carlson on ABC News.

The organization is also getting rid of the evening gown part of the competition because it demonstrates individuality, style and grace, which can be offensive to progressive women who have no style nor grace.

They will be asking contestants to wear clothing that makes them feel confident and express their personal style.

If it takes a particular set of clothing to make one feel confident, isn't that really a false sense of confidence? Shouldn't confidence be an attribute separate from one's attire?

The women, including men who identify as women, I suspect, will also talk about how they plan to advance their chosen causes, referred to as "social impact initiatives" by the Miss America Organization.

"We've heard from a lot of young women who say, 'We'd love to be a part of your program but we don't want to be out there in high heels and a swimsuit,' so guess what, you don't have to do that anymore," Carlson said. "Who doesn't want to be empowered, learn leadership skills and pay for college and be able to show the world who you are as a person from the inside of your soul. That's what we're judging now," Carlson added, without providing ways and means of being able to know what is inside a person's soul. Perhaps that will follow.

Carlson was crowned Miss America in 1989 and looked very nice in her swimsuit and evening gown. But she has also been an advocate for victims of sexual harassment and a #MeToo movement maven. In 2016, she settled a lawsuit against former Fox News Chairman and CEO Roger Ailes. He was forced to step down after other women came forward with similar accusations of sexual misconduct.

She no longer wants beautiful women to be seen merely as beautiful and hates that men tend to fantasize about these beautiful women in their minds, thanks to their ids.

While there is nothing wrong with what the #MeToo movement was created to stand for, it appears that it is snowballing in power and may be getting to the point where innocent men will feel the wrath of angry women who accuse falsely. Certainly not in all instances, because some men still suck, but in enough cases to do harm to the innocent.

And no, it isn't worth the collateral damage to those men, as some in the #MeToo movement claim.

Personally, I believe the Miss America Competition is going to do what the Scouts of America is going to do: become defunct-- especially if young men who identify as young women enter the competition for the sake of political correctness and inclusiveness.

Transgenderism has already ruined women's weightlifting and wrestling competitions.

Hey, and what about ageism? Is it fair that older people can't enter the contest? We must be totally inclusive.

It's political correctness run amok. Maybe there should be no losers. Everyone gets a crown.

But we shall see what happens. Well, except for me--I have no plans on watching it in September.

Tweet

Muslim prof allowed to resign after accused of spanking female students

A Drake University associate professor, Mahmoud Hamad, is accused of making a female student sit on his lap and threatening to spank her. Rather than terminating his employment at the Iowa school, Drake is allowing him to resign, after a report concluded he sexually "intimidated female students" [plural].

Hamad was placed on a leave of absence and "has no teaching or academic responsibilities" at the school, Sue Mattison, the provost told the Des Moines Register on Thursday.

Hamad's resignation is effective June 1st. He hasn't taught since 2016 and went on a sabbatical last year--it's a good racket.

The internal investigation by Drake found Hamad "physically, sexually and verbally intimidated female students and did exploit the power differential that existed between him and his female students."

Perhaps now that he's no longer working for the school, he can get a job at NBC.

Due to the existence of political correctness and the fact that Hamad is a Muslim and the school doesn't want to be labeled 'Islamophobic,' the university did not refer the case to the Des Moines Police Department.

The first student to speak out about the randy assistant professor was graduate student Nickey Jafari, age 24. She posted on social media last year that she met Hamad, who became her adviser, in the summer of 2011 during a student trip to Egypt. Hamad was the group's leader and instructor.

She said Hamad "asked her to sit on his lap" and she did so twice. She also stated that Hamad "put his arms around her and his face was close to her neck." The kinky prof then asked Jafari to refer to him as "Dad."

Jafari said he promised her a free trip to Egypt if she had a perfect grade-point average and also claimeld Hamad threatened to "spank" her if she did not receive all A's.

According to Jafari, she decided to report Hamad because she feared he would go to another school and do the same thing with other young women students. She added that Olympic gold medal-winner Aly Raisman inspired her to come forward. [Raisman was one of the sexual assault victims of disgraced gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar.

Investigators found the claims against Hamad "credible" and found he "violated university policies through unwelcome advances and unwelcome verbal and physical conduct and intimidation aimed at female students because of their sex."

Jared Bernstein, the director of Drake's public relations, told Fox News: "Drake University is committed to the safety and well-being of all students, and especially those who have the courage to come forward with a complaint."

Evidently they are not committed to the safety and well-being quite as much, for those students too frightened to come forward, nor are they committed to terminating the employment of scum wafers who violate the school's commitment, particularly if it isn't politically correct to do so.

Tweet

UK student union believes deaf people are fragile snowflakes

(Screen grab: Heat Street)

Silly Old England's largest national student union told its annual conference goers that they would face "consequences" if they cheered and/or clapped because doing so would exclude deaf people. Using that logic, then talking at the conference would do exactly the same thing.

The National Union of Students (NUS) held a two-day conference Tuesday, which includes most of the university student unions. During the talks, audience members were repeatedly admonished and warned that they must stop expressing support or whooping it up for a speaker because it has "serious impact" on the accessibility of the conference the The Telegraph reports.

In lieu of applauding, the students were directed to use "jazz hands"-- waving their hands in the air but avoiding making contact with both hands as a noise is created buy doing so. This noise cannot be heard by the deaf student in the audience and this might make him feel excluded.

The union's committee member Estelle Hart, chaired a session Thursday and told students: "No whooping, it does have a serious impact on some delegates ability to access conference." She later had to remind them, "gentle reminder not to whoop."

Jazz hands
(Photo: Wikimedia.org)

Whooping and clapping has come under attack in the past by the student union. Some NUS events banned clapping because it might "trigger anxiety," and new calls are pouring in by union leaders on the far left to not speak out loud as the deaf student in the crowd cannot hear the tone of voice being used to make a point. They should only be permitted to move their lips and the audience must read them.

While there is absolutely no objective proof about the assertion that it might trigger anxiety anymore than it might trigger explosive diarrhea, political correctness has nothing to do with science or logic--it's all about feelings. 

Nothing more than feelings.

Please follow Brain Flushings by clicking the Follow tab in the right margin.




Tweet

Trump and Pentagon may abandon social experiments under Mattis

There may be changes for the military blowin' in the wind. That is, the changes that have already taken place might change back to the way things were before President Obama began his social experiment with gays, men who think they're women, and women who think they're men, joining the military and being special recognition.

Under Obama, the military tried to integrate transgender persons into the ranks of the mentally stable military population that comprise the majority of the troops, and allow women into special operations forces and rid gender-specific words for more "politically correct" leftist terms. 

This was Obama's softer, more gentler side of his military, and it went against our traditional military approach. 

Puke-worthy as well is the fact that some Navy warships were named for civil rights activists.

But what the Obama administration de-emphasized were expressions of Christianity in the ranks--some officers were even disciplined for having visible Bibles or gospel verses in their living quarters. 

At least the same discipline was not meted out to Muslim officers and enlisted men.

There is a good possibility that Trump's choice for secretary of defense, General James "Mad Dog" Mattis, will not make Obama's gay, transgender and politically correct social experimentation agenda a big priority. Mattis isn't looking to have a gentle, softer military; he's looking to have an awesome, powerful one that will keep the peace because unlike under Obama's administration, nobody will want to mess with it.

"Mad Dog" Mattis will bring back the warrior ethos to the Pentagon.

U.S. Army Gen. Jack Keane (ret.) said the emphasis on social reform under Obama came at the expense of the military's core objective.

"Social engineering was a distractor from what the main mission of the United States military was about," said Keane. "We were involved in conflict and war, and these reforms achieved a level of prominence that subordinated the issue of war itself."

Outgoing politically correct DoD Secretary Ash Carter "made it clear" that he won't stand in the way of the incoming administration making their own policy decisions.

Because he can't.

Under Mattis, the issue of women in combat will likely be revisited. Last year, Ash Carter opened land combat jobs in the infantry and special operations to women, and at that time, Mattis said women should not be in combat because, if they were, the nation's enemies wouldn't fear "America's awesome determination to defend herself."

Mattis also said that physical standards for combat jobs would become more lax, and women would not have privacy for their "bodily functions."


Tweet

Delusional man who believes he's a woman tries suicide again

Kansas City, Mo. -- Chelsea Manning, a man whose given name was Bradley which he changed to Chelsea because he has gender identity confusion, tried to off himself for the second unsuccessful time.

Manning is in prison for leaking classified information to WikiLeaks, a website that reveals classified information and compromises countries and people's lives. 

The disgraced transgender soldier had tried to kill himself back in July and was put into solitary confinement as punishment. This made him sad.

His attorneys, Vincent Ward and Chase Strangio gave the news of this suicide attempt to the press but declined to discuss the details of last month's attempt. However, it is safe to say that there is no change in Manning's mental status as he continues to believe he's a woman and would like his penis removed and inverted to provide himself with visual evidence.

Although his lawyers will not discuss the suicide, they did talk about his prison conditions, including a solitary confinement that exacerbated his fragile mental state. 

In an email to the AP, Strangio called 'her' treatment since 'her' 2010 arrest and subsequent time serving a mere 35-year sentence instead of a capital sentence, "demoralizing and destabilizing assaults on [her] health and humanity."

Perhaps if political correctness was avoided and real mental health interventions were tried, he wouldn't try to kill himself. 

But referring to transgender men by the opposite pronoun is an abuse of logic. Biologically, Manning is a man--it is only "on paper" that he's a 'her', and biology is a fact, not delusions.

If Manning thought that he was a rhesus monkey in human flesh, would we treat him like a monkey just to be PC?

Personally, I don't like traitors and I don't give a damn that Manning feels demoralized. Manning was arrested in 2010 and convicted in 2013 for leaking over 700,000 highly classified documents of the military and the State Department to WikiLeaks. 

What he did was seditious and in times of war, the death penalty would have been the punishment.

But insofar as assaulting his health, both physical and mental, I believe there are better interventions than simply going along with a delusion--and that goes for all people who believe they are not the gender that biology has assigned to them. 

Psychotherapy is the best way to go, but even the field of psychology and psychiatry have become politicized and what was once called "gender identification disorder" is now called "gender dysphoria" because the authors of the DSM-V (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 5th Revision) were pressured into 'normalizing' the delusion of gender indentification confusion.

And politicizing diagnoses is a load of bull.

In spite of that, the ACLU sued the U.S. Department of Defense over its refusal to "treat" Manning's gender dysphoria. They wanted the DoD to pay for the surgically removal of Manning's penis and make it look like a vagina as a way to treat his mental problem.




Tweet

BBC is PC with Ali, the Munich terrorist

The BBC had fallen into lockstep with the Politically Corrupt and has chosen not to report the Munich attacker's Islamic first name in order to scrub any Islamic link to the scumcrumpet who shot up a Munich mall, killing 9 and injuring 16, three of whom are listed as serious.

Allah forbid the BBC offend any terrorists out there--that's what gets them angry, that's what gets them to kill us, when we draw a cartoon, eat bacon, allow women to go outside uncovered, or simply want to hold off on allowing refugees from Islamic nations to enter our country without proper vetting.

The shooter's name was ALI David Sonboly. He targeted children in order to make his deed even more horrible. But the BBC didn't want to go overboard with something known as "truth," that would be too, um, journalistically responsible.

It's likely that Ali David Sonboly is not connected directly to a terrorist organization such as ISIS, or the Taliban, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, al Nusra, al Shabaab or the Angry Amish. But the lengths that the BBC went to in order to keep his first name out of the media would be laughable if it wasn't so disgusting. 

Most of the other major outlets used the shooter's Islamic name. CNN even referred to him as Ali Sonboly. 

Thanks to the prodding of Breitbart News, the BBC finally used the killer's full name.

Andrew must be laughing somewhere.



Tweet

If you see something, say "Nice day, right?"

Omar Mateen posted warnings that ISIS was going to be attacking civilians in the USA in the next few days. He was questioned several times by the FBI in 2013 and 2014. He tried to buy body armor and bulk ammunition along with the weapons he purchased and the gun shop owner called the FBI to report it.  

Mateen was a problem kid in school for fighting and had been expelled. He was a problem adult as he used drugs and was denied acceptance into the police department. 

At work, people have said that he was trouble but as a Muslim, he got special privileges and the other worker who was most bothered by Mateen left the job, not him. 

Mateen was a loser who called his wife while killing people asking her if he was on the news. Thanks to the media, his claim to fame came after he killed and was killed by law enforcement.

Mateen's father, an Afghan immigrant, supports the Taliban and tried to get elected as Afghan president. He is at a total loss as to why his son killed those gay people in Orlando. Islam is a peaceful religion, he claims.

Gay organizations are saying nothing about Hillary Clinton's acceptance of money from Islamic countries where homosexuality is punishable by death.

Since the shooting in Orlando, 450 Syrian refugees have been admitted to the USA; 49 of them admitted to Florida. The pace is going full bore now, as Obama is doing his best to get as many Syrians into the country as he can before his term as president ends. 

ISIS has made it clear that they will put their mujahideen among them and cause harm to us. ISIS does not tend to lie when they make such claims.

The 9-11 hijackers used boxcutters to kill the pilots and co-pilots of the airliners that flew into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and Shanksville, PA. The Boston jihadists used pressure cookers with explosives.

Liberals believe they can fix the problem, at least to a large extent, by imposing stricter gun control laws on las abiding citizens. That's not only crazy and stupid--it's suicidal.

The one commonality all the Islamic terrorist attacks have is Islam itself. Even those attacks that were committed by mentally ill people would not have been prevented by more gun control. We need to actually use the laws we have in place and end political correctness once and for all. If anything will get us killed, it's that.



Tweet

The PC of terror

Maybe what we need to do to enhance our safety against Islamic religious warriors is to break up all the "no go" zones in the EU and go into them with military force. If the terrorists in Brussels are born and raised there and are still being recruited for terrorism, maybe we need to speak with the local imams and mosque worshippers and ask them the right questions.

Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country, and for presidents to leave what they're doing and come home to lead the country.

In Brussels, the police are not allowed to pursue bad guys after 9:00 pm. It disturbs people, including the terrorists, and we don't want to make them angry because they might do us harm--oh wait--never mind.

We have passed laws that assure our own destruction. The U.S. Constitution was never meant to keep us from providing self-protective techniques in favor of providing terrorists total freedom and privacy. 

Those on the left have developed a system of what is called 'political correctness.' We are to do nothing to offend any group of people, even those who would be delighted to kill us for the sake of their religion or cultural pursuits. 

When these atrocities occur, the first thing a liberal does is to call for more gun control. The second thing they do is to blame their own country.

The latest body count in Brussels is 31 dead (9 Americans) and 230 wounded. And clearly, this is not the end to terrorism nor will it likely be the end of political correctness. 

Even Fox News said that one witness of the attack heard someone yelling in Arabic. What the witness actually said was that the words yelled were "Allahu Akbar!" which is Arabic for "Allah is greater."

Now even Fox News has gone PC.



Tweet

Political Correctness is the key

In our overseas contingency operation dealing with man-caused disaster that occurred yesterday in an outlier in the Middle East, kinetic military action began with 50 U.S. strategists had begun.

An Al-Qaeda core of militants committed an act of violent extremism which killed some folks at the Schwartz, Ginsberg, Feinberg and Rosenbaum law firm.

This act of workplace violence is being investigated as the Obama administration is using strategic patience to get to the bottom of this mystery.

Leading the investigation from behind, Loretta Lynch said she has no idea what motivated this confusing workplace violence, but promised the American public that she'll get to the bottom of it.

National Security Adviser Susan Rice said that in light of this horrible event, we are taking a "dynamic global security posture."

Rice should get hers out of her nether regions.


Tweet

Obamaspeak and our not-so brave new world

Our vaginally-challenged president has taken the next step in the PC war. No longer will teenagers who break the law be called "juvenile delinquents." Now these little miscreants will be known as "justice-involved youth."

The hilarious verbal gymnastics was spouted this week for the first time by Attorney General Loretta Lynch during a news release regarding the DoJ's new initiative about giving criminals "a second chance" [because they got caught].

"The Department of Justice is committed to giving justice-involved youth the tools they need to become productive members of society," the release stated. She said that her department and the Department of Housing and Urban Development will be launching a $1,700,000 initiative to help Public Housing Authorities and legal assistance groups "reduce barriers for justice-involved youth."

Now, to avoid looking like Hillary Clinton, the Obama administration has even changed the term "boots on the ground" to "direct action on the ground." No, it isn't about sex in the street, it's about not looking like a fool after making the promise that there would be no "boots on the ground" in Iraq and Syria. According to PJ Media, Obama made this statement about 4200 times and there's a bunch more on that website for your enjoyment at the idiocy.

My favorite one is: "Man-caused disaster." It's Obamaspeak for "terrorist attack."

Tweet

Sarah Silverman's stupid opinion

Sarah Silverman spoke to Vanity Fair from the Toronto Film Festival earlier this month where she expressed her agreement with those who are politically correct. This came in response to Jerry Seinfeld who said he stopped performing comedy on college campuses because the students were too "politically correct."

Sarah, much of whose comedy has to do with issues involving human feces, said, "To a degree, everyone's going to be offended by something, so you can't just decide on your material based on not offending anyone. But I do think it's important, as a comedian, as a human, to change with the times. I think it's a sign of being old if you're put off by that."

But the most incredible thing she said referred to doing campus performances, "You have to listen to the college-aged, because they lead the revolution," she said and added, "They're pretty much always on the right side of history."

I guess she was referring to the left side.

The hate exuded by students on the left at the University of Delaware is an interesting example of how college revolutionaries are "pretty much always on the right side of history." 

The level of hatred was exposed by the fact that a bunch of idiot students, after learning the "nooses" they said were hanging from trees on campus, were actually Japanese lantern holders used prior to a Second Amendment presentation given by guest speaker Katie Pavlich. She was invited by the administration to give the speech.

Delaware nooses?

The students didn't care--they wanted to believe the wires in the trees were nooses and even accused the school and police of lying to cover up a crime. This came in spite of the fact that UD police chief Patrick Ogden made a video explaining exactly how the misunderstanding occurred. He even spoke slowly so the students could understand.

"I shouldn't feel unsafe walking past a building where there were supposedly nooses hanging down, but I do," said one student, Elexis Keels. "I don't think it was paper lanterns."

Unfortunately, Keels did not finish the interview with The News Journal because the sun cast her shadow in direct line with her vision causing her to have a panic attack and she ran for her miserable life.

But Keels is not alone. Many students on campus are certain the wires that hung from trees that were used to previously hang paper lanterns are nooses and they're sticking to their story.

And Sarah Silverman is sticking to her toilet humor.


Tweet

Obama al-Jazeera bin Lyin

How different is Al-Jazeera's whitewashing of Islamic barbarism from the Obama administration's? Answer: as different as identical twins.

Al-Jazeera America began by pretending it would cover the news honestly and in depth, but it apparently has as much depth as the snake oil salesman, Al Jazeera Gore, who sold them the slot in 2013 from Current.

The National Review obtained an email that directed Al Jazeera's propagandist "reporters" to not use terms such as "jihad," Islamist," and "terrorist." A top executive for the company, Carlos Van Meek, wrote to the New York and Washington newsrooms about how words can become problematic and also said, "One person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter."

"Freedom fighter" shoots unarmed cop

Or "activist," if you work for CNN, as Christiane Amanpour called the Charlie Hebdo terrorists who massacred the staff at the newspaper. 

Scum buckets who kill children, behead journalists and others while screaming "Allahu Akbar!" are not freedom fighters. The children and journalists they kill are not in any way compromising their freedom. They are terrorists, and Islamic terrorists to be clear. The people who killed 3000 Americans and others on 911 were not freedom fights or militants; they were terrorists, of the Islamic kind.

Van Meek, who fits his name, said we should call terrorists "militants," or "fighters." He said that calling them extremists is forbidden. "Do not use the term Islamist," he said, because it's a "simplistic label."

Van Meek's level of political correctness has reached a point of pandering to Islamic terrorists. Al Jazeera is a champion at pandering--before they pandered in America, they pandered to Osama bin Laden and his terrorists of the Islamic kind. 

But don't fret, patriots, Al Jazeera has about as many prime-time viewers (18,000) as an Al Sharpton anti-white march.

So what about Obama and the boys on the left? Well, they're trying to convince us that Jordan's plan to swap Sajida al-Rishawi the terrorist, for Muath al-Kaseasbeh, the Jordanian pilot, is not the same as the Bergdahl trade last year. 

Bergdahl, a deserter at best, and a traitor at worst, was traded for the release of 5 Taliban terrorists at worst, and Islamic terrorists at best from Gitmo. 

Eric Schultz from the State Department made the case that the Taliban is not a terrorist group but an "armed insurgency." This Obama butt-boy claimed that "we don't pay ransom, we don't give concessions to terrorist organizations." So by this logic, the Taliban cannot be a terrorist organization because we made a concession. That's what we call an argument from fallacy:

We only make concessions with non-terrorist organizations.
We made concessions with the Taliban.
Therefore, the Taliban is a non-terrorist organization.

What we need to consider, in order to determine whether or not the Taliban is a terrorist organization, is our observations and the answers to the following questions:

1. If the Taliban was designated a terrorist organization during the Obama administration in 2010, and identified Hakimullah Mehsud and Wali ur-Rehman as specially designated global terrorists, has anything changed to declassify the Taliban as terrorists?

2. Does the killing of 141 people, 132 of them children at a Peshawar school by the Taliban, qualify them as terrorists?

3. Does the use of Improvised Explosive Devices, used to indiscriminately kill human beings, qualify the users of such devices (i.e., the Taliban) as terrorists?

If you still think the Taliban is merely an "armed insurgency," you might be a lberal.

Tweet

Cpl. Nathan Cirillo Laid to Rest

Corporal Nathan Cirillo, a Canadian Army reservist who had been shot and killed Wednesday by an orthodox Muslim doing his jihad, was laid to rest today. 

A Canadian friend of mine was able to provide me with some photos of the funeral procession as it passed his place of business a little after noon on its way to the cemetery. People stood along the road holding Canadian flags and signs that read: "We salute you, Nathan Cirillo."

The Prime Minister Stephen Harper had said on Wednesday that this was a terrorist attack and made it clear that Canada will not be intimidated. President Obama doesn't do that so much here. He seems to think "terrorist" is a dirty word, and the biggest lie of all is his past statement that Islam is a religion of peace and that ISIL is not Islamic.

We Americans need to wake up and smell the jihad.

The practice of taking passports from suspected jihadists is a mistake, I believe. All it serves to do is trap them here, piss them off, and give them something to do with their hands, if you know what I mean.


If we take passports, we need to put these monsters away. If we allow them to travel to such places as Syria or Iraq, we need to blow them away. The only way we can do that is with American troops on the ground, locked and loaded along with ground spotters and serious airstrikes that are aimed at killing rather than making a political statement.





When a leader is too afraid to actually name the enemy, that country is doomed for defeat. If we do not secure our borders, the enemy of the United States will come here in large numbers. If we do not demand that Islamic leaders strongly condemn jihad and Sharia law, we will become alligator bait.

Rest in peace, Corporal Cirillo. We can only hope and pray that your death will be a clear alarm to our allies in the north and our president on the golf course.


Tweet

Political Correctness v US Constitution

Robert Copeland, 82 year old Police Commissioner of Wolfeboro, NH, exercised his First Amendment Right and now is being asked to resign. He was at a local restaurant and "pulled a Donald Sterling." I do not know the words he used, however, he made a racial slur aimed at Barack Obama.

But Copeland has the right to say whatever stupid thing he wants to say. He will be judged for his honesty or stupidity by his peers. Yes, he was stupid to say it, and even more stupid to say it in a public place, but if all of us lost our source of employment for saying something insensitive, untrue, or stupid, most of us would be on the dole, and that would make Obama happy.

The town manager and board of selectmen joined with residents in demanding the resignation of Copeland, who held the post since March. 

Over 100 town residents were at the commission's meeting to demand the resignation., but Copeland said that he won't apologize for using the expletive slur, because he believes that Obama meets the criteria for it. Whether you believe that or not, we need to ask ourselves if Copeland has the right to say what he wants without jeopardizing his job. We need to consider the Constitution.

Here's a refresher on the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

We have this as part of the Bill of Rights not for speech that we agree with, but for speech that may offend us. To punish someone for exercising this right, is a way to put an end to having this right.

I have mixed feelings about the situation. On one hand, Copeland represents the town, but on the other, we are systematically eroding away our rights through Political Correctness. What might have been a tongue-lashing in the past for such behavior, has become a severe punishment by people who are just as fallible as the miscreant who perpetrated it.

Tweet

Politically Correct Suicide

The Detroit police are trying to figure out if the attack on a white motorist by a mob of black men qualifies as a hate crime. The man, 54 year old Steve Utash, accidentally ran down a black youth and went to render aid when he was brutally beaten by the mob, his paycheck stolen, and he was left in critical condition. He is currently in a medically induced coma.

I believe all crimes where a person is beaten for no other reason than a way for a mob to pass the time and maybe steal something, is a hate crime. If it isn't a hate crime, what is it? A sort of I'm angry crime? A love gone wrong crime? Perhaps we need to consider what is politically correct in this case.

So far, 4 scumbags have been arrested and police expect more arrests. City officials have criticized the beating (I guess they saw something wrong with it too) and have called for witnesses to come forward. The word "race" has not been mentioned, nor has anyone in the black mob that attacked the white man been called a racist.

The very Right far left Reverend Al Sharptongue has yet to comment, but my guess is he'll have little to say and certainly not blame it on the mob because of their melanin levels. Jessie Jackson will likewise do the same.

In another incident, a Jesuit priest in Syria was dragged out of his church and shot twice in the head. He died immediately. The gunman was a Syrian rebel.

Father Van Der Lugt

The priest, Fr. Francis Van Der Lugt was 75 and was originally from the Netherlands. He served the Syrian Christian population for about 50 years. Where other Christians were being killed or threatened, Fr. Van Der Lugt stood his ground. 

An antigovernment activist, Mahmoud Taha told the New York Times "The death of the priest is a scandal for the rebels. They no longer accept anyone but those who are like them." He may have been referring to Muslims being different from Christians, but mum's the word.

State Department spokesrobot, Jen Psaki, spoke on behalf of the country and said the US was "saddened by the news" of the priest's killing. She bravely added, "We condemn this violent attack and all attacks against innocent civilians and minority communities."

No mention of the word "jihadist" was made, nor was a word mentioned about the religion of peace. But so long as we verbally condemn brutal killings like this one, we are going to upset a lot of jihadists and make them feel guilty. In fact, they may never do something this untoward again. Shame on them. Shame.

It's a good thing Psaki didn't yell: "Islamophilia! This killing was done by an Islamophiliac."

I believe many of us have reached a point where we've become like ostriches with our heads in the sand. Others have their head stuck elsewhere. When we come to realize that Islamists don't respect words over deeds, strength over weakness, it may be too late to stop the spread of Islam. 

Islam has become like the visitor who comes to your home and tells you what to do. He expects you to cater to him, feed him, and do his bidding. If you give him an inch, he takes a mile. If you give him a hand, he cuts off your head.

But at least in doing so, you'll be politically correct.



Tweet

3 More Suspects Suspected of Being Involved with the Boston Bombing

Three more suspects have been taken into custody related to the Boston Marathon bombing. Two are foreign "students", and one is an American citizen. It's totally possible that these three are just Bidenesque, which means they are dumber than a bag of damaged rocks and were simply tried to ditch the evidence left behind by their buddy, terrorist #2. So, it is possible that they might not have been involved with the actual bombing, but still, they aided their terrorist buddy rather than turn him in to keep him from killing more innocent people. 

Terrorists #s 1 & 2

I believe they knew about terrorist #2's plan because they knew just what to get rid of--the computer, fireworks, and Vaseline. At best, even if they didn't know, they put their friendship with this Islamic terrorist ahead of the lives of those he killed and maimed, and had he gotten away with the bombing, the lives of future victims he might have killed. These "students" need to be put away for a long time, but not as criminals--as enemy combatants. We are at war, my friends.

Some are calling these terrorists "self radicalized terrorists," but only by people who have never read the koran. The koran is the Islamic scripture that clearly talks about killing the infidels "wherever you find them." It is Islam itself that is radical, not people who somehow misinterpret it. We continue to pretend that Islam is a religion of peace out of fear that we will offend Muslims and they will strike out at us. Well, how's that working out for ya? They strike out at us when we draw a cartoon of their violent, anti-Semitic prophet, peas be up in him, and they strike out at us when we don't.

I suggest we never call these terrorists by name and when we label them as such, we need to be clear and call them Islamic terrorists. To liberals, this will be considered "racist" even though Islam is not a race but a radical geopolitical movement cloaked in religion. And by using the term "Islamic," we are defining the problem and thus the enemy. If you don't believe that Islam itself is the problem, just quote parts of the Medina koran (Sura 9:25 for example) and watch the reaction from Muslims. 

My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about Islamic terrorism and suspense.  In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist, Zed Nill, a journalist, captured by terrorists and who is destined to be killed if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners.  Of course, American policy demands we never give in to terrorists, and for Zed, the clock is ticking.

Jihad Joe Soft Cover       

click here for ebook version  

My other blog New York Canuck

Tweet