Charity shop worker jailed for child abuse photos after being cleared of showing his junk to children

Samantha Norris (she, it)

Samantha Norris, a gender dysphoric man was accused of "exposing his penis" to a pair of 11-year-old girls from his window in Ringwood, Hampshire in merry old England. However, Mr. Norris was cleared by a jury for the act by a jury at Southampton Crown Court for sexual activity in the presence of a child that was alleged to have occurred on July 27, 2023.

Mr. Norris is in the process of having his penis mutilated to look like female genitalia.

[H/T Mirror UK.]

But aside from that, the 56-year-old charity shop worker has been convicted for possessing extreme child abuse images, and has been jailed for two years for this crime.

Norris told the court that he was a naturist who was “habitually naked” in his own home and the children could only have seen him naked if they had been “spying” on him. In other words, he is the victim here, and if you call him "he," you will be attacked by the LGBTQ+1~XYB43/3X community, whose numbers and letters are growing by the minute.

Norris, who worked at a Sue Ryder charity shop in his home town of Ringwood,  said he had been the victim of abuse from youngsters in the town and he felt these girls had been “taunting” him. 

During the trial Charles Gabb, prosecuting, told the jury that Norris was naked by the window when he was seen by the two girls on two days in a row.

He said: “The defendant, Miss Norris, now transitioning, [s]he has a penis, was standing there fully naked, on the first day almost glorifying in that nudity over quite a period of time knowing the girls were there and drawing attention to her[him]self. And the next day when [s]he saw them again and [s]he was naked, glorying in her[his] nudity, almost posturing, definitely manipulating her[his] penis with these two young girls being able to see all this. The Crown would suggest there was no attempt to cover up, no attempts of any modesty or propriety.”

Norris' pronouns are she, it.

He said that one of the girls described the defendant “throwing her[his] penis around” and added “both children could see her playing with her penis and knowing the children were watching. It certainly caused alarm for these two children and an element of distress as well.”

After the jury returned its not guilty verdicts, Mr. Norris entered guilty pleas to three charges of making indecent images of children of categories A, B and C, one count of possessing prohibited images of children and a charge of possessing an extreme image depicting a person engaging in sexual activity with an animal.

Along with the prison sentence, Judge Nicholas Rowland made Norris subject to a sexual harm prevention order for 10 years. 

Norris had 16,000 images of children including about 2,000 still and 121 moving images of category A seriousness. The images included children aged as young as three with others showing youngsters aged about six in “distress and pain,” the court heard.

Sentencing Norris, Judge Rowland said that Norris had also in his possession written notes describing sexual fantasies involving a four-and-a-half year old child and a “New Year’s resolution to have sex with a girl under 10.”

He told the defendant: “It’s all about you Samantha Norris and not the victims. You do not accept they are victims, you have distorted views and you do not feel your offending should be treated as serious – how would a right-minded person think about that? Your views are alarming and complex – you present a high risk of harm to children.”

He added: “It’s pretty blatant to me that you decided not to enter guilty pleas (earlier) as these pleas would have gone in front of the jury of the other matters.”

It's unclear as to whether Norris will be serving his time in a male or female slammer.

Tweet

Britain has "too many unskilled migrants" according to their interior minister

England's interior minister Suella Braverman told The Sun on Sunday newspaper that the country has too many low-skilled migrant workers and an extremely high number of international students who frequently bring their dependents into the country. 

Speaking ahead of the ruling Conservative Party's annual conference, Braverman also said that Prime Minister Liz Truss' government will aim to stand by the 2019 pledge to lower net migration.

Finance minister Kwasi Kwarteng said on Sept. 23 that the government was going to review immigration policy as part of an attempt to boost growth, after complaints from various business groups were lodged about the post-Brexit rules being too restrictive, especially for low-paying jobs.

However, Braverman said reducing migration was an aim shared by all of Truss' senior ministers [as well as most normal Americans].

"What we've got is too many low skilled workers coming into this country," she said. "We've also got a very high number of students coming into this country and we've got a really high number of dependents."

"Those people are coming here, they're not necessarily working or they're working in low-skilled jobs, and they're not contributing to growing our economy," she added.

Yes, as some are good people and some want to change England to comport with their own ideologies.

Since January 2021, most workers must be paid at least £25,600 ($41,000) a year for an employer to sponsor a visa, causing problems for employers in sectors such as agriculture, hospitality and some manufacturing, where lower wages are common.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Braverman also said she wanted to restrict the ability of migrants to challenge deportation on the basis that they had been subjected to forced labour or human trafficking, known in Britain as "modern slavery." In the United States, migrants avoid the need to challenge deportation as Democrats think of them as future Democrats.

Tweet

KFC proves they use real chicken

Next time you find yourself in Twickenham, England, and you're in the mood for some finger lickin' good chicken, head on over to the KFC [Kinda Funky Chicken] and have yourself a treat. 

A woman who only goes by the name Gabrielle, alleged that she  “found a fried chicken head in my hot wings meal. Put me off the rest of my meal, urgh.”

Now why would that put Gabby off? They didn't charge her extra and the bird wasn't about to bite back. 

A photograph on the Instagram account Takeawaytrauma, has displayed similar instances in which customers have gotten more than they expected. 

In spite of this, many on Instagram were horrified that Gabby gave the meal a two-star review. What would a one-star review have to be--a Muffin McFeces on a rat turd bun? The fact that Gabby reviewed the place at all tells us there's something wrong with Instagram.

KFC told England’s The Sun Online: “We were genuinely surprised by this photo. Since Gabrielle got in touch, we’ve been looking into how it happened.”

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Here's how it probably happened: some chicken chopper thought it would be epic to include the head in the meal and see where the chips would fall. Maybe (s)he was about to be fired from his/her job, or maybe (s)he was about to quit. But that's not a good way to get a head.

“Put simply, we serve real chicken — and we’re proud of that — but this has clearly slipped through the strict processes and checks in place with our suppliers, partners and teams, who freshly prepare everything in our restaurants. It’s true that even the best laid plans can on rare occasions go awry. And this is an incredibly rare one.”

KFC also offered Gabrielle free KFC which is absolutely the very least they could have done.

By G-d, there will always be an England!

Tweet

The Economist too woke for most folk: upset that Italian soccer team composed of Italians

Woke joke The Economist, not known for its sports commentary, on Wednesday said that the Italian championship soccer team's lack of diversity the most "striking" feature of the squad. Apparently this embarrassment of a media outlet is more interested in skin color, gender identification, height, intelligence, and physical attributes than their ability to play the game.

Italy beat England in the Euro 2020 final on Sunday in penalty kicks to take home the championship trophy.  While fans went wild, The Economist went woke and was most concerned about the lack of black and brown players on the Italian team. There was also a lack of Asians, midgets, gays, lesbians, and paraplegics, Jews and Muslims, the latter causing Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Ilhan Omar (D-MN) to have a cow.

"The most striking aspect of Italy’s 26-man squad before it took to the pitch was that, alone among the main contenders, it did not include a single player considered as being of color," The Economist tweeted. However, there were indeed several players who identified as being black women in spite of their genitalia but the outlet did not report on that. Also, there was one player from Calabria who identified as being a transgender woman with chronic testicular engorgement--she goes by the name of Bruno.

"THE EURO 2020 final between Italy and England was striking, not just for the clash of footballing styles in the match itself, but for the socio-political undercurrents that swirled between the two sides and touched on issues that included nationalism, internationalism and racial sensitivity," the Economist wrote in the accompanying piece.

The outlet went on to note the squad received criticism for their "ambivalent" approach to taking a knee as a gesture of opposition to racism and that the sporting event "favored" the country's right wing.

"Since when has a knee done botz to stop racism?" Vito DeGennaro, Team Italy's kicking lefty coach said. "You gotta do more than a knee to keep a da people from saying a bad tings about people of a da color," he added. "Fahgeddabowdit."

Normal people were confused by The Economist's narrative and mocked the premise of the silly tweet.

"BREAKING: Italian team was comprised entirely of Italians. More at 11," The Daily Caller mocked.

Based on the Economist's narrative, others wondered whether the outlet would publish similar analysis of African soccer teams.

Why not consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against ignorance and evil.

Tweet

High School bans expensive coats so that all look poor

"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" Sir Winston Churchill

Merry Old England --  Students in Woodchurch High School in Birkenhead, [Goooo Weasels!] located in northwestern England, are no longer allowed to wear "expensive" coats to keep warm for the winter.

The socialist/communist headteacher of the school, Rebekah Phillips,  sent a letter to parents in early November warning them that "expensive" coats would no longer be allowed in order to take away incentives for poor students to excel in their studies and secure lucrative jobs as adults. The ban would take effect after Christmas and the headteacher is "mindful that some young people put pressure on their parents to purchase expensive items of clothing."

So the school is acting as a go-between for the parents and their kids while taking the pressure off poorer parents along with their decision-making responsibilities as parents.

The coats being banned are from Canada Goose and Moncler, brands that can cost well over $1,000.

"These coats cause a lot of inequality between our pupils," Phillips told the Comedy News Network [CNN]. "They stigmatize students and parents who are less well-off and struggle financially."

Stigmatize: verb describe or regard as worthy of disgrace or great disapproval.

That's an awfully powerful claim.

Headteacher Phillips claimed students have told her the cost of such coats is the same as their parents' monthly rent. [And apparently, they don't want to end up like Michael Avenatti's law offices that have been ordered to be vacated.]

"There has been feedback from children, who say 'Gosh, that is our rent for the month," Phillips claimed.

Do you really think kids use the word 'gosh'?

The socialist/communist goody-goody said she plans to "poverty-proof" the school by making everyone appear poverty stricken.

Parent Andy Treanor, told CNN the ban "did not matter" to him because he wasn't going to spend that much on a coat, but if he did, Phillips could go . . ."

The school provides free sanitary products to female students.

"At Woodchurch High, we teach and strive for equal outcome over equal opportunity because we don't think these kids can handle the latter," Miss Tidbits, a dance studies teacher said proudly as she snatched a free sanitary product and slipped it into her purse.

Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.




Tweet

UK student union believes deaf people are fragile snowflakes

(Screen grab: Heat Street)

Silly Old England's largest national student union told its annual conference goers that they would face "consequences" if they cheered and/or clapped because doing so would exclude deaf people. Using that logic, then talking at the conference would do exactly the same thing.

The National Union of Students (NUS) held a two-day conference Tuesday, which includes most of the university student unions. During the talks, audience members were repeatedly admonished and warned that they must stop expressing support or whooping it up for a speaker because it has "serious impact" on the accessibility of the conference the The Telegraph reports.

In lieu of applauding, the students were directed to use "jazz hands"-- waving their hands in the air but avoiding making contact with both hands as a noise is created buy doing so. This noise cannot be heard by the deaf student in the audience and this might make him feel excluded.

The union's committee member Estelle Hart, chaired a session Thursday and told students: "No whooping, it does have a serious impact on some delegates ability to access conference." She later had to remind them, "gentle reminder not to whoop."

Jazz hands
(Photo: Wikimedia.org)

Whooping and clapping has come under attack in the past by the student union. Some NUS events banned clapping because it might "trigger anxiety," and new calls are pouring in by union leaders on the far left to not speak out loud as the deaf student in the crowd cannot hear the tone of voice being used to make a point. They should only be permitted to move their lips and the audience must read them.

While there is absolutely no objective proof about the assertion that it might trigger anxiety anymore than it might trigger explosive diarrhea, political correctness has nothing to do with science or logic--it's all about feelings. 

Nothing more than feelings.

Please follow Brain Flushings by clicking the Follow tab in the right margin.




Tweet

6 Unorthodox Ways to Beat Orthodox Islamic Terrorism

There are hundreds of theories on how to defeat Islamic terrorism, but some of the ideas mentioned here are not your garden variety.

First of all, people who are willing to fight for a terrorist organization, particularly those who are willing to blow themselves up for virgins, are enticed by the fact that  groups like ISIS not only look "cool" to them, but they are also winning the war against the West. 

That's cool.

So obviously, the way to make ISIS look "uncool" is to destroy them wherever they have a stronghold. We do that by bombing them in places like Raqqa, going in with foot soldiers, and overwhelming them with our firepower. 

In order to do that, we need to change the current rules of engagement.

Next, those who perpetrate "lone wolf" terrorist acts should never get personal notoriety. Their photo and name should not be splattered all over the news ever five seconds. Rather, they ought to be referred to by such terms as "Islamic loser," or something similar.

The only time to show their photo is after they are killed. Showing a photo of their dead body will give a sense of reality, not romanticism, to wannabe Islamic terrorist recruits and make them think twice as to whether they're willing to go all to pieces for the "cause."

Third, whenever any terrorist attack occurs in the United States, we immediately deport the families of the terrorists. To add insult to injury, every attack will generate a $10 million foreign aid donation to Israel's military. That should put pressure on the attackers who want to destroy the Jewish State.

Fourth, the FBI and/or CIA needs to infiltrate questionable mosques. Those that are deemed recruitment centers for terrorists need to be monitored, the imam or recruiter if not him, needs to be incarcerated, and not provided with Korans, prayer mats or Halal food. If they don't represent "true Islam," they don't need "true Korans," or Halal food.

Fifth, demand that social media find terrorist accounts and block them completely.

Finally, CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) and all of the other arms of the Muslim Brotherhood need to be banished from the United States and Canada. Leadership of these organizations need to be deported with prejudice because it is the leadership of the MB that wants to destroy the United States' "miserable house from within."

I know, I know--it's unconstitutional to do these things and it's not politically correct. Perhaps we need to change our thinking about Islam and rather than seeing it as a religion, declare it to be a death cult. 

Liberals pretend Islam is a religion of peace and that the terrorists don't represent "true Islam." Even George W. Bush said that Islam means "peace." He was wrong--Islam means "submission." And I, for one, refuse to submit to Islam. I'll leave that to the Germans and England.


Tweet

Londonistahn mayor wants Sharia-compliance

 London is gone.

First he came for the ads--but I wasn't a model, so I didn't speak out. Then he came for the Jews--but I wasn't a Jew, so I didn't speak out. Then he came for the gays--but I wasn't gay, so I didn't speak out. Then he came for the bloggers, and there was no one to speak out for me.

Sadiq Khan, London's first Muslim mayor, is calling for a ban on public ads that show women in minimal clothing for ads such as swim suits. He says it's all about "body shaming" those women whose bodies are not like those of a model, but more like the majority of women. Of course, critics are calling him out for what they believe his reason to be: Sharia--or Islamic law.

"As the father of two teenage girls, I am extremely concerned about this kind of advertising which can demean people, particularly women, and make them ashamed of their bodies," Khan wrote. "It is high time it came to an end."

Khan will likely soon attempt to remove "swine" from public restaurant menus, ban outdoor barbecues that cook swine and non halal food, and women wearing short skirts in public. 

Kahn called for the ban claiming that images such as the "Beach Body Ready" photo used by Protein World send a harmful image. Beating one's wife, and honor killings, not so much.

The city's mass transit system, Transport for London, will be creating an "Advertising Steering Group" in conjunction with the advertising companies to ensure that London's transportation "reflect London's diversity," according to Khan's office.

Of course, critics believe this is an accommodation to Sharia.

And they would be correct. 

London is gone.


Tweet

Europe Sort of Readies for More Jihadist Attacks

European security officials are preparing for terrorist attacks by the religion of peace, a religion whose idea of peace is when there is no opposition left to disturb their peace. They are specifically worried about public places where large numbers of infidels gather, such as sports stadiums, music concerts (music is prohibited in Islam) and other venues where girls, and others, just wanna have fun.

France officials are preparing for attacks against the european Football Championships which begin June 10th, and comprise 51 matches among 24 teams playing in 10 host cities across the land of the dead Muhammad satirists.

Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said that over 90,000 security personnel will be assigned to protect the 2.5 million infidel spectators expected to be at the games, and hundreds of thousands watching "Jumbo-trons" in areas known as "fan zones" in major cities.

The head of France's domestic intelligence agency, Patrick Calvar said "We know that the Islamic State is planning new attacks in France. We risk being confronted with a new form of attack, a terrorist campaign characterized by placing explosive devices in places where large crowds are gathered, and repeating this type of action to create a climate of panic."

Calvar believes that at least 645 French nationals or residents, 245 of whom are women, are with ISIS in Syria and Iraq. Another 200 are in transit, either on their way to the Middle East or returning to France.   At least 244 jihadists have already returned to France.

If they are allowed to return, then France will get the coveted International Idiot Award, currently held by Germany. The spoiler hopeful, Donald Trump, may ruin our chances of winning the award if elected POTUS as he will stop Muslim immigration "until we know what's going on."

Around 23,000 police will be assigned to protecting the Tour de France and will be taking steroids to enhance their ability to perform their jobs.

The laptop of Salah Abdeslam, the scumcrumpet who lost his nerve when it came to becoming a martyr, had information and photos on it that showed an Islamic State plot to attack British football fans in the southern France city of Marseille when England plays Russia on June 11th.

Spoil sports.

British police are mostly unarmed, which makes perfect sense if you're suicidal and view impotence as sexy. If ISIS attacks, they will retaliate with strong admonishments and perhaps tell on them to their mothers.

British police chiefs are having a hard time recruiting police officers who are willing to carry a firearm because liberals will treat them as criminals if they have to use them in the line of duty. 

We are our own worst enemy.


Tweet

Germany's Integration Law

Finally after months of back and forth arguing, the German coalition government has agreed to a "new Integration law." Its aim at defining and regulating the rights and responsibilities of asylum seekers. 

Specifically, the law encourages refugees to learn enough basic German to get off their butts and find a job that will help pay their living expenses.

Last year over 1.1 million migrants entered Germany, and of those, 476,649 have applied for asylum while the remainder hid in the shadows and turned to crime and drug dealing. About 49% of the migrants who applied for asylum were rejected over the last two years, but they haven't left Germany, according to leaked government reports.

Chancellor Angela Merkel called the new law a "milestone," and her Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel said that it represents a "true paradigm shift in Germany," or a fundamental change in the approach to fundamental assumptions.

Critics say the law is mostly a symbolic  measure designed to reassure voters and assuaging the dramatic rise of the anti-immigration Alternative for Germany party. 

Yes, they actually formed a party to counter the insanity of German immigration from Africa and the Middle East simply because it's ruining their country.

The Integration Law was announced May 25 after a 2-day conference in Schloss Meseberg (literally "Drunken Mice," I believe) a castle north of Berlin. The new law would make socialist Bernie Sanders proud as it gives the government an active role in the integration process.

Key components of the law include:

Integration Courses: to learn the German culture, society and values. It will expand from 60 to 100 hours and the available slots will increase ten-fold to 200,000 nationwide. It will be obligatory for all asylum seekers and those who refuse to attend will have  their social welfare benefits will be cut and will thus have to turn to crime. Very well thought out.

Language Courses: Asylum seekers will now be permitted to apply for language courses six weeks after arrival (it used to take three months), regardless of whether their asylum applications have been processed or if they are members of any terrorist organizations. "All's fair in immigration and war." Thus, all refugees seeking permanent residency must be proficient in German, for now, but in the future, all Germans will need to be proficient in Arabic. 

Work Programs: the government will create 100,000 low-wage jobs paid for by the taxpayers of Germany whether they like it or not. Refugees who refuse to work will not be sent out of the country but will get a reduction in welfare benefits and in order to provide for themselves, will likely turn to crime. 

Labor Laws: will be relaxed to encourage private German companies to hire refugees, even if better qualified German or EU citizens are available because that's the liberal way--take care of people who hate your country, rape your women and indoctrinate your children to their way of death. 

Ghetto Prevention: regional government will determine where refugees will live, either by banning them from certain areas (German "no-go zones") for the next 3 years. The objective is to prevent refugees from forming "no-go zones" that become dangerous enclaves for normal (non-Muslim) German people. 

Permanent Residency: refugees who are proficient in German, ja, and can be grownup by supplying for their own upkeep, can apply for permanent residency after 5 years, provided they don't fight for ISIS or any other terrorist group.

Speaking to the proliferation of migrant rapes of German women, the document states: "We will not accept assaults on women, children and others in need of protection, whether such attacks are directed against German citizens or against refugees."

Wow--that ought to scare the crap out of those refugees who rape and murder. It makes as much sense as gun control in the USA.

On a lighter note, the law only applies to legitimate asylum seekers--people who would probably obey the law--not to the hundreds of thousands of migrants from the Middle East, Asia and Africa who entered Germany illegally by lying about being asylum seekers.

Germany is gone. 



Tweet

The UK and Burning the Unborn

At least 15,500 unborn babies were burned along with the hospital trash and, in some instances, used to heat several UK hospitals, a recent investigation uncovered. The parents of those children who died from pregnancy complications were told their unborn child was cremated, instead of used as heating fuel.

Parents in the UK who lose a child due to complications are treated with as much compassion as a spider has to a fly, and the parents have no say in what happens to the body of their child.

The health minister, Dr. Dan Poulter, called the practice of burning dead fetuses, "totally unacceptable." That's so good to hear, isn't it?

A Cambridge hospital, Addenbrooke's, burned 797 babies to heat the facility, and no surprise, told the mothers that the remains of their child was cremated. (Incinerated vs. cremated; what's the big deal?)

Ipswich Hospital, a privately operated institution, burned 1,101 babies between 2011 and 2013. Hitler would have been proud and is probably smiling in his bunker as I write this.

Anyway, since the details of this horror have seen the light of day, the NHS Medical Director, Sir Bruce Keogh, wrote a snappy letter to the trustees of the NHS telling them this practice must immediately stop.

Lucky for Merry Olde England that summer is coming.

That human life can be reduced to the category of trash, best used as heating fuel, speaks volumes about how many "pro-choice" people view the unborn. Like Obama said, when babies are unplanned, they are "punishment[s]" and he doesn't want to have his daughters punished with one of those things. Note two things: 1. the baby doesn't get to choose; 2. as Ronald Regan said, people who support abortion have already been born.

The reason liberals fight to keep pregnant mothers, who are considering abortion, from seeing their child in the womb is because if they did, they would never go through with killing him or her. 

And the thing I fear is that something like this can happen here.

Tweet

London's Burning

A young gang member gets shot, his friends get angry at the cops who shot him, and young people all over London and the surrounding countryside go 'planet of the apes'. Vehicles and buildings are set on fire, people are attacked randomly, and 16,000 police are deployed--more cops than actually work in London--being brought in from other towns. PM Cameron tells the nation that the perps will feel the full force of the law.

Why is this happening? Is it really about the 29 year old man who was shot? Lefties say it's the fault of the banks, but as they say in England, that is balderdash. The left is trying to romanticize this criminal activity, saying that it's frustration over lack of jobs and funding for education. It somehow doesn't feel right to me that these kids are thinking more about their burning desire to go to school, than their burning desire to burn something. 

In Philadelphia there are "flashmobs" going into convenience stores and robbing them. Because these are angry young men, they think they are allowed to vent this way, but in reality,  it isn't venting, it's simply an excuse to get a new notebook, new smartphone, or whatever, and now there is a 9 pm curfew in Philly for kids under the age of 18 on Fridays and Saturdays. The Mayor has had enough and he wants parents to act like parents and take control of their kids.

In Ontario, Canada, of "flashrob" got together after coordinating a rendezvous at a local convenience store, and about fifty kids walked into the store and helped themselves to whatever they could grab. They used social networking to pull this off.


What's going on with our society? Is it the economy? Jobs? Social injustice? Or is it simply the fact that they can get away with it and get "stuff" without the hassle of having to pay for it?  I really welcome your opinion.

Tweet

POTUS Does the Royals

Unfinished business

For a guy hoping to be king of North America, Barack H. Obama did it up right--almost. He went to Moneygall, Ireland to visit the town where his great great great grandfather, on his communist mother's side, came from many a year ago. He went to a pub and lifted a pint of Guinness with the locals, faked a brogue reminiscent of an Irish Spring soap commercial, and did his best to score points with white folk back home. Hopefully for Obama, these white folk either have short memories or other mental health issues in order to be capable of nullifying his claims of being Christian, black, white, son of a Muslim, but grandson of a Christian whose son was the Muslim who fathered Obama. Darn, it just gets so confusing. But I'm sure the liberal press will write around the confusion and make it impossible to understand anything more than the fact that Obama is one of us, and loves us all--so we must love him. See, if we don't vote for him, then we are racists, but now I'm not even sure what race he is anymore--he may be one of us or them  .  .  .  or both.

Meanwhile, back in merry old England, Obama toasted the Queen; did an Obama-like pause, then the band played "God Save the Queen" and he rambled on during the playing, which was considered extraordinarily rude and totally impeachable--but not in America, so it didn't count. He also signed the guest book and dated it two years prior to his arrival, which knowing him, wasdone  for some covert plan he has for the future to cover his tracks with an alibi and protect himself from legal prosecution for a deed only he knows about at this time. Mark my words, you're going to want to remember this down the road and I'll say it now, "I told you so."


One can only surmise what went through the Queen's mind seeing the man who called France, not England, America's closest ally. Was she thinking, "What's wrong with England--are we chicken soup?"  I believe Elizabeth had a royal WTF moment--even greater than the one she must have had when the O-Man returned Winston Churchill's bust to England after two weeks upon arriving at the White House. We shall not discuss the DVDs he gave the royal family as a gift when DVDs don't play, in England. In retrospect, it was probably better that the DVDs didn't play there since they were probably Cop-Killing Rap Crap, which would have put Obama in a bad light.  All Anglophiles must have hoped that Barack and Michelle would be forced to scarf down a large helping of blood pudding with their stuffed Dan Quale as punishment for our rapper-loving prez.


Back in the States we can only hope Obama changes the tactics he is known for and actually goes after terrorists on American soil, rather than having them as guests at the White House or allowing them to tour FBI facilities.