Posts
There are moments that reveal with almost embarrassing clarity the state of institutional America today, and this is one of them. Gabby Stout has just secured a ninety-five-thousand-dollar settlement from her school, Ardrey Kell High School in Charlotte, North Carolina. The offense? The school had accused her of vandalizing the campus “spirit rock” with a tribute to the assassinated conservative activist Charlie Kirk and had placed her under police investigation.
Only two days after Kirk’s killing, Stout had obtained explicit permission from the school to paint a tribute on the rock, a surface routinely decorated by students. Together with two friends she wrote “Freedom 1776” and “Live Like Kirk—John 11:25,” surrounded by hearts and an American flag. Hours later the school painted over her message and sent a notice to the entire student body declaring that the rock had been vandalized with an unauthorized statement that violated the student conduct code. Law enforcement, it said, had been contacted and an investigation opened.
Stout was pulled from class, interrogated, and made to write a statement. Her phone was searched without her parents’ consent. The following day the school quietly altered its speech policy, closed the investigation, and announced that she would face no discipline. Yet it refused to issue any statement clearing her name. Her parents say the episode left their daughter exposed to threats and bullying, for which the school offered no apology. Only a month later did the institution reverse itself, withdrawing the vandalism accusation and admitting that law enforcement had never been involved.
The Alliance Defending Freedom brought a complaint charging that the school had violated Stout’s First, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The filing highlighted the obvious moral double standard. When George Floyd died in 2020 the same rock had been painted with messages supporting Black Lives Matter. Those expressions, it seems, raised no alarms.In a statement to Fox News, Stout expressed the hope that the settlement would illuminate the rights of students:
“I hope they learn that students don’t leave their faith or their free speech rights when they walk into school. I didn’t do anything wrong, as they now admit. I was sharing a message I believe in, a message that inspired me, and a message that honored Charlie Kirk by pointing people to the hope for salvation through Jesus Christ. And they made me feel like a criminal for doing this. School officials can’t just silence a student because they don’t like what the student says or believes.”
ADF Senior Counsel Travis Barham put the matter plainly. “Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools should be ashamed at how it treated Gabby. She did everything right, and they did everything wrong. She got permission, and she painted an uplifting message of faith. They censored her speech, publicly denounced her, and then punished her for expressing her views.”
Beyond the financial settlement, the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education has now approved new speech policies intended to clarify the rights of students. One can only hope the lesson is learned. When institutions treat a young woman’s act of remembrance and faith as a criminal matter while indulging other political expressions, they do not merely embarrass themselves. They expose the selective authoritarianism that now passes for education in too many American schools.
Tweet
Only two days after Kirk’s killing, Stout had obtained explicit permission from the school to paint a tribute on the rock, a surface routinely decorated by students. Together with two friends she wrote “Freedom 1776” and “Live Like Kirk—John 11:25,” surrounded by hearts and an American flag. Hours later the school painted over her message and sent a notice to the entire student body declaring that the rock had been vandalized with an unauthorized statement that violated the student conduct code. Law enforcement, it said, had been contacted and an investigation opened.
Stout was pulled from class, interrogated, and made to write a statement. Her phone was searched without her parents’ consent. The following day the school quietly altered its speech policy, closed the investigation, and announced that she would face no discipline. Yet it refused to issue any statement clearing her name. Her parents say the episode left their daughter exposed to threats and bullying, for which the school offered no apology. Only a month later did the institution reverse itself, withdrawing the vandalism accusation and admitting that law enforcement had never been involved.
The Alliance Defending Freedom brought a complaint charging that the school had violated Stout’s First, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The filing highlighted the obvious moral double standard. When George Floyd died in 2020 the same rock had been painted with messages supporting Black Lives Matter. Those expressions, it seems, raised no alarms.In a statement to Fox News, Stout expressed the hope that the settlement would illuminate the rights of students:
“I hope they learn that students don’t leave their faith or their free speech rights when they walk into school. I didn’t do anything wrong, as they now admit. I was sharing a message I believe in, a message that inspired me, and a message that honored Charlie Kirk by pointing people to the hope for salvation through Jesus Christ. And they made me feel like a criminal for doing this. School officials can’t just silence a student because they don’t like what the student says or believes.”
ADF Senior Counsel Travis Barham put the matter plainly. “Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools should be ashamed at how it treated Gabby. She did everything right, and they did everything wrong. She got permission, and she painted an uplifting message of faith. They censored her speech, publicly denounced her, and then punished her for expressing her views.”
Beyond the financial settlement, the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education has now approved new speech policies intended to clarify the rights of students. One can only hope the lesson is learned. When institutions treat a young woman’s act of remembrance and faith as a criminal matter while indulging other political expressions, they do not merely embarrass themselves. They expose the selective authoritarianism that now passes for education in too many American schools.
Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.
No comments:
Post a Comment