If Biden gets away with a win, he promises to flood the country with refugees by a lot

Joseph Robinette Biden claims Trump's immigration policies are fraught with fear-mongering and xenophobia--fear that foreigners will scarf up jobs that benefit legal immigrants, and xenophobic feelings defined as patriotism.

The not-yet-president-elect jabbered about "plans" to greatly increase the number of annual refugees admitted to the United States. Currently, the maximum number permitted per year is 15,000. These are refugees, people who were allegedly in danger living in their home country, not legal immigrants. Biden would increase that number to 125,000 per year.

Biden made the ridiculous statement in a prerecorded video created for a virtual celebration of the 40th anniversary of Jesuit Refugee Service in the safety of his basement, far away from the deadly China virus that he has no real plan to eradicate.

If this brain-addled geriatric escapee, who cannot put a coherent sentence together, becomes our next president, you can bet your butt he will provide full entitlements to these refugees as well as illegal aliens who sneak into the country, all at the taxpayer's expense. 

Politicians never, ever pick up the check or have to abide by the laws they create for us.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon.

Tweet

DHS 'can confirm' gang members and criminals in caravan

The Department of Homeland Security on Thursday agreed with President Trump and VP Pence that violent criminals are a part of the Honduran caravan heading through Mexico and on its way to a town near you.

White House reporters asked how they know this information.

"@DHSgov can confirm that there are individuals within the caravan who are gang members or have significant criminal histories," DHS spokesman Tyler Houlton tweeted Tuesday night.

"Citizens of countries outside Central America, including countries in the Middle East, Africa, South Asia, and elsewhere are currently traveling through Mexico toward the U.S.," he said.

Trump acknowledged that there is no hard "proof" that criminals are part of the caravan, but he said that he has "very good information."

It's interesting that a group of migrants who want to claim refugee status in the United States, who are supposedly fleeing their country out of fear for their lives, are waving flags of their native country, and they're burning ours. The flag below has a Nazi swastika on it.

And why aren't these "refugees" applying for refugee status in the first country in which they arrive?

I hope Trump cuts off all their aid if they don't intervene.


Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.

Tweet

500 German police arrest 6 suspected Syrian terrorists

On Tuesday morning, 500 German police officers on an anti-terror raid, detained six Angela Merkel sanctioned Syrian refugees suspected of fighting for ISIS.

Authorities say they were planning a terror attack six days before Christmas and the attack, they believe, was to target a Christmas market, because that's what those scum wafers do and Germany keeps taking them in.

Six Syrian Muslim men between the ages of 20 and 28 were taken into custody, Frankfurt prosecutors said. About 500 police officers were involved in the raids of eight apartments in the cities of Kassel, Hanover, Essen and Leipzig.

The prosecutors said the men are suspected of "planning an attack with weapons or explosives on a public target in Germany." The men had not yet finished preparing for the attack.

Four suspects entered Germany in 2014 as asylum-seekers; two arrived in 2015, Deutsche -Welle reported. Authorities were tipped off by refugees about the men--they were reportedly active ISIS fighters in Syria.

The German newspaper Welt, reported findings from the attorney general of Frankfurt explaining that the Syrian scumspects are ISIS supporters. They were arrested on suspicion of membership in a terrorist organization and preparation of a terrorist attack.

Thank you Angela.



Tweet

Austria: 90% Muslim refugees end up on welfare

When they arrive

You can call them asylum seekers or refugees--same old, same old, but in Austria, the reality is that nine out of ten of them wind up on welfare and the Austrian taxpayers foot the bill.

Austrian Interior Minister Wolfgang Sobotka is doing all he can to resist the EU's efforts to send more asylum seekers to Austria by increasing the quota. He claims that 90 percent of them end up on welfare and strain the system.

Sobotka says that "Austria has borne the main load from 2014 to 2017," and "Our system is simply overwhelmed."

It needs to be emphasized that no Arab Gulf countries (Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman and the UAE)  has taken in any Syrian refugees, for example. 

And a more recent report (Jan. 2016) says Arab monarchies turned down refugees fearing security threat. 

"If you look at the asylum seekers, you can see that 90 percent are migrating to the needs-oriented minimum security system," Sobotka said, adding that border security is of great importance. "We had up to 15,000 refugees per day on some days, today it is an average of 30."

"It is important to keep the pressure on those who bring migrants illegally to Europe via the Mediterranean and in other ways," he added and said that if the EU fails to keep up the pressure, it will be a sign for human smugglers who will double their efforts to smuggle more people into Europe.

The EU's migrant distribution plan is viewed as unfair in many EU countries and some such as Hungary and Poland have rejected the plan altogether. 

Hungary and Slovakia appealed to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) saying that the distribution agreement was invalid because it didn't have unanimous consent from member states and their citizens.

But the ECJ rejected the appeal and membership to the EU is looking less and less representative of a democratic or republic-style union.

When they are in the majority

Heinz-Christian Strache, chairman of the anti-mass migration Freedom Party (FPÖ), said the figures "show how deeply we are in a crisis of fairness," and urged the Austrian public to vote out the current Austrian People's Party-Social Democrat coalition "before the Austrian population changes" [to a Muslim-dominating society]. 


Tweet

Supremes back Trump on refugee ban for now

The U.S. Supreme Court has bigly backed President Trump's travel ban, saying he can stop thousands of unvetted refugees from entering the United States while the justices prepare to hear a broader challenge to the policy where liberals can hopefully allow the floodgates to open and all hell to break loose as illegal immigrants and so-called refugees to flood into the country.

The Supremes put on hold a federal appeals court ruling in which a judge, trying to make a name for himself in the progressive community, said that the President of the United States couldn't apply his travel ban to approximately 24,000 refugees once a resettlement agency promised they'd provide basic services for them.

The high court is scheduled to hear arguments October 10th on Trump's travel order, which imposes a 90-day ban on primarily unvetted Muslims entering the U.S. from six Islamic theocracies and a 120-day ban on refugees.

The whole purpose of the ban is simply to vet these people because vetting is smart and ISIS has promised us that some of their scum-crumpets will be among the innocent. Not vetting the refugees is stupidly suicidal, in spite of the lower courts with their leftist judges saying the President of the United States overstepped his authority and unconstitutionally target Muslims. 

The small-time judges are trying to grab power over the president and make themselves more powerful among their leftist peers.

The high court cleared part of the ban on June 26th. It is to take place for now and ruled that the U.S. had to admit people with a "bona fide relationship with a person or entity."

In July, the Supreme Court ruled that those with grandparents and cousins in the U.S. are among those who must be admitted. Of course we're never certain of familial ties and basically have to take their word for it, but the administration said Monday it wouldn't ask the court to revisit that issue.

The Trump administration asked, in the same filing, to reinstate a broad version of the refugee ban because the so-called assurance agreements don't meet the "bona fide" test as those accords are between the resettlement agency and the government.

"An assurance agreement does not create any relationship whatsoever with the refugee," acting U.S. Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall argued.

Hawaii, where former president Obama was allegedly born, challenged the Trump policy. They urged the justices to allow the appeals court ruling to stand, saying assurance agreements require resettlement agencies to make large investments in preparing for the arrival of refugees. They also believe the refugees don't pose any true security threat, but obviously they're trying to blow smoke where the sun doesn't shine.

"Refugees with formal assurances are the category of foreign nationals least likely to implicate the national security rationales the government has pointed to in the past," Hawaii argued. "By the government's own admission, these refugees have already been approved by the Department of Homeland Security."

If government agencies were so great at risk analysis, why are there so many lawsuits against drug companies when we have the FDA?



Tweet

More vacuous CNN clap-trap using Sesame Street's Elmo

In another even lower-class attack on Trump, Certainly Not News (CNN) called on Elmo of "Sesame Street" fame to go after the travel ban against terrorist nations.

As CNN attempts to appeal to the left by using imaginary beings like Elmo to make political points, they show us just how rational they are and how far they've developed emotionally. 

They have sunk to the bottom of the toilet this time when they used the popular Sesame Street character as a propaganda tool against the president's travel ban.

Popular "Sesame Street" character Elmo sympathized with refugee kids in an interview Monday with CNN, remarking that they are just like kids in America.

Elmo was part of a panel including CNN reporter Clarissa Ward, Sherrie Westin from Sesame Workshop, and David Miliband from the  International Rescue Committee.

"Did you find that the Syrian little girls and little boys were a lot like your friends here in America?" Ward asked Elmo.

"Yeah, they really were," said the "Sesame Street" character. "It was very interesting because they like to play and learn just like Elmo and all of his friends at Sesame Street." 

So now it was time to attack President Trump and the travel ban:

Miliband also addressed the US Supreme Court's decision to uphold parts of Donald Trump's controversial travel ban and the President's stance on refugees.

"It's worth saying, perhaps especially today, that this country, the US, receives very few refugees and there's a lot of fear and loathing being put out." [Hunter Thompson is rolling in his grave]. 

Naturally, there was absolutely no explanation in the 15-minute segment by CNN  about the ban's purpose which is to improve the vetting procedures for refugees coming from terror spawning countries, that is, countries designated by the Obama administration as particularly dangerous when it comes to seeding refugees with terrorists.

Children propaganda elsewhere

That is, the temporary pause is meant to keep "Sesame Street" watchers of all ages, even liberals with poor reality-testing skills, safe from the Islamic threats that Europe and Scandinavia are dealing with on a daily basis.

Neither Elmo nor CNN mentioned that many of these refugees from those countries would rather stay in their own country and would prefer America's refugee plan to stabilize the region or create safe zones.

Elmo and CNN both forgot to mention the trauma associated with separating children from their family, or the terror risk associated with bringing these refugee kids over with adult family members.

The CNN propaganda was obviously meant to blackmail American children and get them to view President Trump as a monster, and not of the cookie-eating kind, who hates children.

Just more evidence that CNN sucks more than a million Dyson vacuums.


Tweet

Did POTUS Put Us On?

In a betrayal of a campaign promise over refugee admissions, the Trump State Department has apparently put that big, beautiful door in the wall before the wall had even gone up.

In the coming weeks, at the very least, there will be an inundation of refugees entering the United States. It went from about 830 refugees for the first few weeks this month, to 1500 as tens of thousands more are waiting to get here.

And there is no reason to believe that it will slow down anytime soon. 

If refugee admissions continues at the projected rate, the Trump administration will have an Obama-esque rate of refugees coming here and the rate will be one of the sixth highest since 9-11.

The New York Times (May 27th) reported how the State Department quietly lifted the department's restriction on the number of refugees allowed U.S. entry. Their decision was conveyed in an email Thursday by Jennifer L. Smith, a department official to the private global agencies that assist refugees  manage the nearly two-year application process.

Smith wrote that refugee groups could start bringing people to the United States "unconstrained by the weekly quotas that were in place."

The way it looks by the numbers, the total number of refugees admitted by the end of the fiscal year, Sept. 30, could be around 73,000.

"This is long overdue, but we're very happy," said Mark Hetfield, president and chief executive of HIAS, an immigrant aid society.

The Republican Congress has been keeping big business donors smiling by sending them a steady supply of cheap labor and handing over tons of money for refugee resettlement. 

Remember, President Trump campaigned on the platform of a moratorium on refugee resettlement, but seems to be backsliding on this issue. The one thing that isn't clear is wether the State Department made this upward adjustment with the president's approval, but the Department of Justice had been contacted.

The question is, now that Trump definitely knows, what's he going to do about it?


To follow Brain Flushings, click the Follow tab in the margin.

Tweet

American majority support immigration restrictions & wall

Blocking traffic for Allah

A new poll indicates that a majority of voters support President Trump's executive order that temporarily halts immigration from 7 terrorist-spawning countries and want fewer refugees coming into the U.S. overall.

The poll was conducted for the Harvard Center for American Political Studies by the Harris Poll company. The poll is co-managed by Mark Penn, a Democratic pollster,

It was found that 51 percent of polled individuals want the U.S. to accept fewer than the current 100,000 per year that Obama wanted to import. The Trump administration's plan sets the number at half the Obama amount.

Fifty-three percent also support Mr. Trump's executive order banning all refugee resettlement from Syria and freezing all refugee resettlement for 120 days. 

Forty-seven percent of those polled oppose the new curbs on refugees coming into the U.S. according to Harris, but there was no data released to indicate the percentage of those who strongly support or oppose the curbs.

A regional judge's order (which was probably unconstitutional) halted Trump's refugee resettlement freeze but did not affect the halving of total refugee resettlement numbers. This action led to a mad dash into the U.S. from five of the seven terrorist-spawning countries. 

Thanks to this liberal judge, who will not be personally affected by his poor decision, 60.1 percent of refugees arriving since his ruling are from Iran, Iraq, Somalia, Syria and Sudan. Of the Syrian refugees, 99.6 percent are Muslims. Of the others, 55 percent are Muslims. 

This shows that the 45 percent non-Muslims who rushed here for resettlement do not think of this as a Muslim ban. 

The 500,000 refugees arriving in the U.S. since 2009 will cost the American taxpayers $4.1 billion for just this year alone. Breitbart News previously reported that "$4.1 billion can buy 10,677 new homes for $384,000 each, which is the average price of a new home sold in the United States in December 2016. Or it could buy 170,124 new autos for $24,100 each, which is the manufacturer's suggested retail price for a 2017 Chevrolet Malibu."

Sadly, most of the refugees are only capable of low-skilled employment and their presence here will take away thousands of jobs while bringing few useful skills.

A complete shutdown of all refugee resettlement would save us billions. They will continue costing us more in welfare and aid than they generate in taxes, according to uncomfortable facts, and cost us no less than $3 billion every year, not including the costs added on by the U.S. criminal justice system when they commit crimes and plot terror attacks.

The Trump refugee resettlement freeze has strong and broad support. A Feb. 8 Morning Consult poll found 55 percent of voters overall, supported the president's executive order. Of those, 82 percent of Republicans support it.

Another poll (McLaughlin & Associates) found 57 percent support a halt in order to implement better screening procedures.

Rasmussen Reports found 52 percent of voters favored a freeze on all refugee resettlement until the government can better screen out terrorists. Of this polling population, 57 percent were young voters.

The next big issue after terrorism will be which bathroom a person will be able to use depending upon the existence or absence of mental issues.





Tweet

New Acting AG will enforce immigration order

Former acting Attorney General Sally Yates has been fired and replaced with a new acting AG Dana J. Boente. He has pledged to "defend and enforce" the laws of the land. Isn't that special?

When Yates refused to enforce Trump's lawful order, he did what he is known for: he fired her. And he was perfectly in his right to do so since she refused to do what she was sworn to do. An Attorney General doesn't get to pick and choose which laws (s)he wants to uphold.

She learned of her firing Monday evening in a hand-delivered note from the White House Office of Personnel, just hours after she directed the Justice Department lawyers not to defend the executive order. She wasn't convinced it was lawful or consistent with the agency's "obligation to always seek justice and stand for what is right."

Trump said in a statement that she "betrayed the Department of Justice by refusing to enforce a legal order designed to protect the citizens of the United States."

He fired her faster than a first-round loser in 'The Apprentice.'

Sean Spicer said in a statement that "Ms. Yates is an Obama administration appointee who is weak on borders and very weak on immigration."

According to The New York Times, Boente was sworn in at 9 p.m. ET. 

"I am honored to serve President Trump in this role until Sen. Sessions is confirmed. I will defend and enforce the laws of our country to ensure that our people and our nation are protected," Boente said in a statement.

The executive order faced condemnation from executives at top companies who might be upset that they cannot hire illegal immigrants to perform cheap labor. Both Goldman Sachs and Coca-Cola are among those companies, both of which threw tons of money at the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.

An Obama spokesman said the former incompetent president is "heartened" by the protests [if he only had a heart]. 

It is highly probable that Obama will not go away because he doesn't have the class of a George W. Bush. If it was up to Obama, there would be no borders, no fixed genders, no Israel, and America would be 'about average.'

But it isn't up to him.

Trump's executive order temporarily halts the U.S. refugee program and bans all entries from the same Muslim-majority countries that Obama first mentioned. The ban is only for 90 days but Soros-funded protesters are acting as if it's forever.

Speaking of Soros, have you noticed that since Hillary lost the election, the Soros-funded Black Lives Matter people are no longer relevant?

The entire refugee program is to be paused for merely 4 months and there is an indefinite ban on all people from war-torn Syria. But federal judges in several states, including New York, issued orders that temporarily block the government from deporting those with valid visas who arrived after the travel ban took effect. That seems to be a reasonable thing to do.

In spite of the chaos that ensued from the ban, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said: "You now have a president who really takes seriously the tremendous threat of international terrorism and is prepared to take steps that are very tough-minded and that are going to inconvenience some people."

The American people are behind President Trump and his tactics for keeping America safe. But leftists, like George Soros and Barack Obama are apparently going to do everything they can to get in his way for their own agendas.

Tweet

UPDATE: Acting AG tells DoJ staff "don't defend Trump's refugee order

UPDATE: She's fired! 

President Trump has fired Acting AG Sally Yates. He has every right to fire any Attorney General who refuses to back him up, as long as what is in question is legal. Like it or not, you have to admit, Donald Trump isn't your father's President.

Mr. Dana Boente will be taking Yates' place as Acting AG.

The news of her firing just came in at around 9:40 p.m. Monday.

Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, directed the Justice Department attorneys Monday not to defend President Trump's executive refugee and immigration ban. Yates is an Obama holdover until she can be replaced by the Trump administration.

The AG said in a memo that she was "not convinced" the President's order was lawful, not its defense consistent with the DoJ's obligation to "always seek justice and stand for what is right."

That sounds as if she's suggesting the President stands for what is wrong.

Her directive is likely to be temporary because Sen. Jeff Sessions will likely be the Attorney General and Yates will be back to practicing law on a less political level, one only hopes. Sessions is currently waiting for Senate confirmation.

However, Yates' decision has only increased the chaos surrounding the order. The Associated Press said that Defense Secretary James Mattis, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly and Rex Tillerson, who is awaiting confirmation as Secretary of State, are reportedly unaware of details of the directive until around the time the President signed it. Also, intelligence officials were not provided with the intel about the order.

Strange!

Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations committee, said despite White House assurances that congressional leaders were consulted, he learned about the order the same way Barack Obama learned about everything he learned as president: from the media.

There was immediate fallout between Trump and his top advisers and a sprint by the Pentagon to seek exemptions to the order. Trump's approach also sparked a public clash between the president and the civil servants who had to carry out his policy.

Bad!

Many American diplomats circulated a memo opposing the order which temporarily halted the entire US refugee program and banned entry from seven terrorist-spawning countries for 90 days. Sean Spicer, the White House Press Secretary and spokesman challenged those opposed to Trump's measure to resign.

"They should either get with the program, or they can go," he said.

The response from his own national security advisers exemplifies his weak relationship with them, as well as the incredible bureaucracy that exists in Washington. Trump outlined his plan for the temporary halting of US entry but it was crafted in a confusing way, stunning those who joined his team.

Mattis may be the most incensed. He along with Joint Chiefs Chairman Joseph Dunford were aware of the basic concept of Trump's order, but not the details. Tillerson told Trump's political advisers that he was baffled over not being consulted on the actual substance of the order.

Trump's order pauses the refugee program for 4 months and indefinitely bans all those from Syria, but it doesn't ban other countries with terrorist ties such as Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

While Trump privately acknowledges flaws in the rollout, he also blames the media, much like Obama blamed George Bush for all the problems he's facing. He said the voters who carried him to victory support the plan as a necessary step to safeguard the USA, and dismissed those opposed to it as attention-seeking rabble-rousers and grandstanding politicians.

That sounds like a dodge.

Let's hope this gets straightened out once Jeff Sessions, his SCOTUS appointment, is in office and his Cabinet is filled completely.



Tweet

Sweden: Migrants turn shopping center into no-go zone

"Just not in my neighborhood"

Gothenburg, Sweden -- Migrant gangs have turned Sweden's largest shopping center, Nordstan, into a "no-go zone" in spite of the fact that politicians don't acknowledge they even exist. The youth gang intimidates police, harasses girls and openly deals drugs.

The local police say they've been forced to implement extraordinary measures to cope with the increased number of incidents that have left shoppers and business owners terrified. What those 'extraordinary measures' are, remains a mystery, because the police seem as impotent as an Obama red line. 

They have turned out in force but the gangs keep coming.

Jonas Bergqvist, a team manager of the city police, told local media: "We have seen an increase since last autumn, with mostly unaccompanied minors who are staying here in North Town.

"In the evening they deal drugs and violence between factions sometimes occur. If there are conflicts from their home countries, they bring them here."

And Sweden welcomes you and your conflicts.

Rikard Sorensen, a colleague of Bergqvist, said the gangs have become increasingly more aggressive toward police. "There is a lot of drugs circulating.  I wouldn't even let my son go down to North Town. There is a risk of robbery, but also harassment of girls."

Muslim males harassing infidel girls? Wow, that's amazing.

Like many shopping centers, this one has become a central place for young people to meet. And while some Swedish teens also engage in some of the incidents, the officials argue that it's the migrants from Syria and Afghanistan, as well as Moroccan street urchins, who are behind the huge increase in criminal behavior.

The shopping center was forced to close early on New Year's Eve because thugs threatened to set off fireworks inside the structure. About 150 teenager migrant kids surrounded police officers. "There was an incident at Nordstadstorget and some policemen were surrounded by a large number of young people and they experienced the situation as threatening and called for reinforcements," Bergqvist said.

There were also incidents of robbery and a shopkeeper being threatened when he tried to stop some scumcrumpets from stealing.

Mr. Sorensen was clearly against Sweden's liberal immigration policy as many of the foreign thugs have no identification papers. The lack of ID forced police to hand over the thugs to social services because they couldn't prove they were adults. "I've had people in front of me that look like they are 35, but who claim to be 15. I can't prove they're lying so we have to release them," Sorensen said.

Why isn't the burden of proof of age on the thug instead police? Oh, I forgot--Sweden's policies are liberal.

Politicians and people who make policy and laws are not the ones normally affected by the policies and laws they make. Obamacare is a one example--politicians on the Hill have their own health care protection and are not forced to get Obamacare.

Gun laws is another example. Politicians in the U.S. are protected by guns, either their own or by men and women with guns. So it's easy for them to pretend that stronger gun laws protect the regular citizen.

Sweden is learning the hard way, like Germany, France and the rest of the EU--when you take in unvetted refugees, you're going to have problems.

And why aren't any Islamic countries, like Egypt, Jordan, Sudan and so on, taking in Muslim refugees?

Tweet

Translator reveals Muslim hate and how they want to "Islamize" Germany

A 39-year-old female translator originally from Eritrea came to Germany in 1991 as a refugee herself. She eventually volunteered at refugee asylum centers to "give something back." She claims that Muslim migrants hate Christians and want to Islamize Germany.

The Arabic-speaking translator said that what she discovered over the past five years working with migrants shocked her after hearing Muslim refugees preaching "pure hatred" of Christians.

She said that Muslim kids are ordered by their parents not to play with Christian kids, and she was told by a refugee that it is a sin for her to help feed and defend Christians.

The translator told German Catholic website Kath.net that "They want Germany to be Islamized. They despise our country and our values." She explained that many of the migrants showed their "true colors" when only around other Muslims. "Pure hatred against non-believers is preached, and children are brought here from an early age here in Germany.

"It's very similar in asylum housing, where Muslim boys refuse to play with Christians.

"Some woman told me, 'We will multiply our numbers. We must have more children than the Christians because it's the only way we can destroy them here.'"

The translator also said that other translators were part of the problem because they prevented Christian refugees from claiming permanent asylum because they never told them they were entitled to have their questionnaires translated.

Anyone who is surprised by this situation in Germany just isn't paying attention to what's going on in the world. The goal of Islam is total globalization in the form of a world caliphate where the only religion is Islam in order for there to be peace.

Thank you, Angela Merkel.

Tweet

MI Township says "no" to Syrian refugees

Oakland County, Michigan -- Waterford Township trustees unanimously passed a resolution Monday telling the feds not to send any Syrian refugees their way until the vetting program "has been significantly reformed."

The resolution stated: "[T]he Charter Township of Waterford will not actively participate in the Refugee Resettlement Program until the Program has been significantly reformed, and until ht has been demonstrated that the Townships of Oakland County have the capacity to absorb refugees without diverting funds from needy residents or exposing their residents to unwarranted security risks."

For more on this problem, read my last blog entry here. 

Waterford Township's population of 72,000 is located in the geographic center of Oakland County, which has a population of 1.2 million.

The resolution passed just prior to the Thomas More Law Center announced that it has been selected to represent Tennessee in its suit against the federal government on Tenth Amendment grounds over the operation of the refugee resettlement program by the feds in Tennessee.

Oakland County Executive L. Brooks Patterson said he intends to sue the federal government for resettling refugees in the county but failing to comply with the "consultation clause" in the Refugee Act of 1980 requiring the feds and the director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement to consult with state and local government officials prior to the placement of refugees within their jurisdictions.

Syrian refugee women shortage

"The resolution, which has been pushed by the Oakland County Association of Township Supervisors, states that the federal Refugee Resettlement Program creates significant financial burdens for communities to mee the needs of the refugees, WWJ, the CBS (local of Detroit) reported.

One Watership Township resident complained, "We've got so many people who need jobs in Waterford, what are you gonna do with the refugees that come in here? You're gonna feed them? You're gonna clothe them? You're gonna house them? We can't afford that; we've got veterans that need help."

Another resident, possibly a low-information liberal who doesn't see the potential problems said, "I've lived here my entire life. I've never been embarrassed to be a Waterford citizen until I saw this resolution." 

However, he did not offer to take in any of the refugees into his own home or have any live next door to him.



Tweet

Sweden is mad as hell and is not going to take it anymore

It's nice to be nice, but Sweden is learning the hard way that being nice isn't always appreciated. 

Sweden's open-door immigration policy has disastrously eroded Europe's most liberal (aka stupid) nation as the Swedes turn their smiles upside-down and strike back at the violence they have been enduring since allowing in 'refugees' from troubled nations. There has been a sharp rise in sex crimes and violent attacks, and the Swedes have had just about enough.

Sweden has for years arrogantly viewed itself as a "humanitarian superpower." With open arms and blond hair they bid welcome to the hordes of mostly young men along with some women and kids who were fleeing war or being persecuted for not being "Islamic enough."

For the past year, their patience is wearing thin from the violence, horrible sex assaults and the death of Alexandra Mezher, 22, a social worker who was stabbed to death at an asylum center for unaccompanied children by a Somalian migrant claiming to be 15.

Mezher's mother, herself an immigrant from the Middle East said that "Immigration has destroyed Sweden."

Last year, the tiny country of only 9.8 million, accepted 163,000 asylum seekers, which included 35,400 unaccompanied children. This migrant influx was nearly ten times what it was the previous year.

And while Swedish government did its best to accommodate the migration, they were totally unprepared to deal with the huge rise in crime and abuse of the criminal system.

For a country that used to leave its doors unlocked, now they had to lock up their young daughters to protect them from gang rape and other crimes.

Just this past January, authorities finally admitted that there were no less than 70 girls in migrant centers who were child brides. This is not at all unusual in Islamic countries where their prophet, Mohammed, took a child bride when she was 6 and consummated the marriage when she turned 9 years old.

Rape of children is commonplace and some officials worry that migrant children are slipping through the system because they lie about their age. Over 660 minors had to have their ages adjusted by officials last year.

Now the final shoe has fallen as Swedes are angry as hell over the belief that refugees have double the chance of landing a job than does a native Swede.

Who can blame them?

The Swedish Migration Board  keeps migrant center locations confidential because they worry about the possibility of violence against them. At one location, a note was posted on the door of a hotel that housed migrants saying: "This is the last warning. Leave our town."

Sadly, we will have the same problems here in the United States if Hillary Clinton is elected and carries out her insane plan to open our borders.


Tweet

Texas wants out of Obama refugee program over terror threat

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott is planning for his state to withdraw from the Obama administration's hair-brain resettlement scheme to take in poorly vetted refugees that could pose a terror threat to infidel citizens. He believes (correctly) that the Obama administration cannot ensure Texas that the refugees pose no existential threat.

In a letter to the Office of Refugee Resettlement, Texas said they will be withdrawing from the program on January 31, 2017. The letter comes on the heels of several terror attacks across the country over the weekend. Abbott obviously sees that as a wake-up call.

The Obama administration refused to approve an actual security plan drafted by Texas that aimed at better ensuring refugees are only resettled after undergoing a real, in-depth security check, not the flimsy "Are you a terrorist?" type-questionnaire test that allow jihadists in under the radar.

The Texas plan would require federal national security officials to provide assurances that none of the individuals being resettled pose a terror threat, but that apparently is too much to ask of an administration whose leader is so enthralled with Islam that he simply trusts all Muslims who would want to live here.

Abbott made it clear that Texas wouldn't accept even one refugee until proper security measures are in place and said in a statement that "The federal government's refugee settlement program is riddled with serious problems that pose a threat to our nation. The director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the director of national intelligence have repeatedly declared their inability to fully screen refugees from terrorist-based nations. Even with the inability to properly vet refugees from Syria and countries known to be supporters of propagators of terrorism, President Obama is now ineptly proposing a dramatic increase in the number of refugees to be resettled in the U.S."

What does Obama care? He's surrounded with armed protection all the time.

An Iraqi refugee who planned to blow up a Houston mall this year had been arrested in Texas, so it isn't as if Abbott is shooting from the hip and making stuff up.

"While many refugees pose no danger, some pose grave danger, like the Iraqi refugee with ties to ISIS who was arrested earlier this year after he plotted to set off bombs at two malls in Houston," he said.

"Despite multiple requests by the state of Texas, the federal government lacks the capability or the will to distinguish the dangerous from the harmless, and Texas will not be an accomplice to such dereliction of duty to the American people," Abbott added. "Therefore, Texas will withdraw from the refugee resettlement program. I strongly urge the federal government to completely overhaul a broken and flawed refugee program that increasingly risks American lives."


It's unclear what the Obama administration will do in reaction to the stance Texas has taken, but don't be surprised if somehow they are forced to accept refugees.

And don't be surprised if it doesn't work out all that well in the end wherever the refugees are resettled. 



Tweet

Obama to displace Trump supporters with 110,000 refugees

President Obama has vowed to take in 110,000 refugees from Islamic countries around the world in the coming year, and use them to replace those who he refers to as "Trump's Deplorables."

The refugees will mainly consist of Muslim males between the ages of 18 and 36 and their wives, between the ages of 8 and 52. 

Most of the refugees, but not all, will help to increase the number of government benefit worker jobs as they will require ongoing taxpayer funded assistance due to the lack of employable skills they bring with them.

Last year the US only took in 85,000 refugees but President Obama said that this number is not high enough, and he has a long history of knowing how high is high enough.

The increase in refugees reflects concerns about the crisis that resulted from Syria's civil war as well as the ongoing jihads in Afghanistan and Iraq. However, advocacy groups never believe that anything one does for the Muslim refugees is ever enough and would like to see a total inundation of immigrants leave their respective Islamic countries and inhabit Western nations in order to receive welfare benefits and then insist upon implementing sharia law. 

The official who informed the media about the actual numbers before it was announced officially spoke on conditions of anonymity as he or she feared retaliation from either the Obama administration or the Council on American Islamic Relations, both of which could cause big trouble.

Failed presidential candidate and current failing Secretary of State John Kerry had previously said the 100,000 figure was a low-ball number, not a ceiling. If it was up to him, he would remove all Republicans and replace them with future Democratic voters.

The current 110,000 figure covers October 1st of this year to September 30th, 2017. If Hillary Clinton lives to become our next liberal president and Donald Trump gets "The Apprentice" renewed, this figure could increase dramatically. 

The Obama administration has tried to emphasize that the refugee program is perfectly safe and poses no major threat to national security. But people with intact reality testing believe that the administration is 'blowing smoke' and that it will put the nation at risk for extremist Muslims to try killing as many infidels as they can.

But the White House continues to try assuring us that refugees would continue to undergo a rigorous screening process such as asking "Did you pack that bag yourself?" and "Are you a terrorist?"

While leaders of Western nations continue to call for a greater influx of refugees, some who are likely to be "on the wrong side of history," there is no reason that safe areas in Syria and in other ravaged Islamic countries cannot be carved out and protected from Islamic jihadist groups while the civilized world goes about the business of eliminating them.

In fact, there's no reason that some of these young men of military age cannot be recruited to fight for their own countries.


Tweet

Donald Trump's Pence can't stop the flow

Indianapolis -- They're pouring into Europe and now they're pouring into the United States--Syrian refugees that we know of, and possibly covert jihadists, that we may soon know of. 

It isn't a fact that jihadists are among the refugees coming into the country; it's a vow by ISIS and they tend to keep their word when it comes to promises. 

It probably pays to believe them.

Republican Gov. Mike Pence's order, several months ago, to block state agencies from helping the Syrian refugee resettlement has been overturned by a federal judge. Since that time 150 refugees have arrived in Indiana.

Groups that assist refugees believe that more will arrive this year, in spite of lawyers for the state appearing before federal appeals court on September 14 to attempt overturning the judge's decision. The judge said Pence's order "clearly discriminates" against refugees from Syria.

And if that means by letting in Syrian refugees that we will be letting in a few scattered ISIS terrorists, well that's just too bad. 

To be fair, Syrians make up less than 10% of the refugees who've resettled in Indiana since October, according to federal records that never tell a lie. Syrians only make up a small fraction of the 10,801 refugees the Hussein Obama administration said late August had been taken in by the U.S. under a year-old resettlement program.

In order to protect the people of his state, Pence attempted to halt Indiana's participation in the refugee influx after the Paris terrorist attacks. He didn't believe the federal government was adequately screening Syrian refugees. Perhaps he got that idea from the questions airport security asks, such as: "Did you pack that bag yourself?" and "Are you a terrorist?"

Pence's position on the flow of Syrian refugees hasn't changed and Donald Trump made it clear that if he becomes president, he would suspend Syrian arrivals until he knows what the hell is going on. In other words, he still sees them as a security threat, and if you believe ISIS, you wouldn't blame him nor Pence.

Disclaimer: not all Syrian refugees are terrorists.

Pence's state administration has tried to withhold funding to resettlement groups for services such as job training and not hating Christians and Jews seminars, but it has not denied them federal help obtaining health care benefits and food stamps, courtesy of the American taxpayers.

"My administration will continue to use every legal means available to suspend this program in Indiana unless and until federal officials take steps to ensure the safety and security of our citizens," Pence said in a statement.

There have been a total of 1,447 refugees who arrived in Indiana from Oct. 1 to July 31, mostly from Myanmar.

Pence asked Archbishop Joseph Tobin in December not to have Catholic Charities resettle Syrian families in Indianapolis, but they flipped him off thrice and went ahead anyway. Greg Otolski, the archdiocese spokesman said that families wait two years or more to come to the U.S. [Mexicans not so much].

"It is one of the critical pieces of what we do to be welcoming to people from across the world who need a safe refuge," he said, [in spite of many of them refusing to acclimate to our customs and laws, he forgot to add]. What he did add was: "We're going to keep providing that service for families who are really fleeing horrible violence in various parts of the world, not just Syria."

Clearly, the intentions of Catholic Charities are as commendable as they are naive.

Disclaimer: not all Catholic Charity members are naive--just the ones who make decisions.


Tweet

Problem solved: shortage of Syrian-born terrorists no longer an issue

It was beginning to look like France, Germany, England and basically most of the EU had the market cornered on Syrian refugee terrorists, but not anymore. The Barack Hussein Obama White House said on Monday that it will admit 10,000 Syrians this fiscal year, just as he pledged.

ISIS had also pledged to infiltrate the hordes of "refugees" coming into the USA with their jihadists, and while they might do many bad things to innocent people, ISIS tends to mean what they threaten.

So, if ISIS can sneak one terrorist in for, say, every one hundred refugees, that would translate to 100 terrorists, and that's bound to be enough terrorists to wreak havoc on the nation.

If the 100 or more terrorists"do their thing," the United States is bound to catch up with the EU and will gain as much sympathy as the rest of Europe. The Olympic gold medals was just the start to the number of terrorist attacks we may withstand--we might break a world record.

Obama has also pledged to stand with the Muslims "if things get ugly," and he wasn't referring to Michelle's 'angry face.' At least we know that he's not worried if the proverbial feces hits the fan--he's got armed security to protect him.

Initially, the U.S. had been off to a slow start with taking in refugees, but now the administration was able to hit its goal about a month early and only a few weeks before our so-called president convenes a summit on refugees at the 71st session of the UN General Assembly.

Susan Rice, who now goes by the title of National Security Adviser, said that President Obama understands the important message that expanding the Syrian refugee and terrorist admissions would send, not just to the Syrian people that are trapped by a chinless dictator, but to ISIS and the rest of the world community. 

Rice had also said that it was a video that led to the Benghazi attack.

Many Syrians have fled to come to the United States, a country they used to hate but now see for its good earning potential. Many of the "refugees" are young men of military age who have refused to stand up and fight for their country.

President Obama wants to make sure that they are rewarded.



Tweet

Obama wants ISIS "refugees" here where we can see 'em

ISIS has pledged to place as many jihadists as possible within the refugee population as they worm their way into Europe and the United States. So far the strategy is working like a charm as more and more terrorist attacks take place in the West.   

Hundreds of unfortunate folks (those who don't have the luxury of a Secret Service detail  or private security to protect them) have been killed by terrorists who have pledged their allegiance to ISIS.

Now in the United States, Syrian "refugees" are pouring in like water into the Titanic, and America is on track for the 10,000 refugees that Barack Hussein Obama called for before the end of September. 

Of course there is no tangible way to get them properly vetted because they are lacking background information, but perhaps the Obama administration thinks that now they're here, we'll be able to keep a better eye on them. "And if they try any of their workplace violence shenanigans, we'll be able to nip that problem right in the bud."

For some reason, Republicans are worried about the security  concerns we face taking in the refugees. What a bunch of worry warts.

July boasted 2,340 Syrian refugees in the United States and lucky for them, our millionaires and billionaires, along with the middle class, will be giving them financial support, education, free stuff, medical care, and all the legal rights they need to fight us in court if convicted of rape, terrorism or anything else. 

But if we don't do it, CAIR will step in to help them.

Last month's figure is more than the admissions of the entire seven months after Obama directed his sedition team to prepare for 10,000 invaders who come from war-torn nations for which they refuse to fight--and the majority of the refugees have historically been military age men. 

The total of refugee influx has reached 7,900 mostly Sunni Muslims, as is ISIS. 

Homeland Security (which is an oxymoron) Secretary Jeh Johnson said earlier in the week that the United States is right on schedule. At the present pace, we'll be sure to have enough undercover ISIS jihadists to ensure that we're going to "make America perilous again."

FBI Director and current president of the Hillary Clinton Fan Club, James Comey predicted a "terrorist diaspora out of Syria." But hello . . . it's James Comey--can we really believe him?

Yet many Republicans do believe Comey's prediction and are warning that the flow of refugees poses a threat to us and Western Europe. 

Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-Fla.) wrote a letter to Barack Hussein Obama asking him to "immediately stop accepting Syrian refugees as a matter of national security."

Mr. Obama gave his signature "Hey stupid smile" and said that he's not at all worried about security. He's got his men to keep him warned.

Buchanan wrote: "We are seeing a clear pattern in which a number of recent attacks have been carried out by ISIS terrorists with ties to Syria, including: the July 24 bombing of a music festival in Germany; the July 26 killing of a French priest; and the July 24 murder of a German woman with a machete. Syrian refugees played a part, either as attackers or accomplices, in all three attacks.

"In the context of this clear threat, your goal of admitting 10,000 Syrians as a part of a so-called 'surge operation' is extremely troubling . . . Terrorists are leaving Syria disguised as refugees and carrying out attacks in the West. The prudent course of action is to halt all admissions of Syrians into the U.S. until the safety of Americans can be guaranteed."

Obama just smiled again and told Buchanan that he's been reading too many Vince Flynn novels.

"There's nothing to worry about, Vern. Do you see me worrying? ISIS is like the WBA playing the NBA," he said in a comment that was not reported by the liberal media because it might have been considered sexist. "And we're the damn NBA." 

Donald Trump didn't miss a beat. In a statement Thursday night, his campaign said the administration was "dangerously expediting their admission."

Mr. Trump also tweeted: "Obama and Lyin' Hillary have got to be nuts, nuts to allow these Muslims to come here unvetted. And I love Muslims, I love them, but you gotta use your head folks."

According to federal government data, the Syrian refugees along with the undercover ISIS jihadists, are being re-settled in states across the country including New York, California and Arizona.  

The "White Lie House" claims that the screening process for refugees takes a year to 18 months and includes face-to-face or face-to-hijab interviews and a review of fictitious biographical information along with biometrics (like fingerprints and things that Syrians don't really keep on record). 

The administration claims that it is focused on bringing in the most desperate refugees, but if they're so desperate, are we really screening them for 12 to 18 months? I bet someone is telling another "white lie." 

Secretary of State and bicycling aficionado, John Kerry, spoke with reporters during a jaunt to Beunos Aires, Argentina. 

Kerry lied that the US has developed "sufficient methods" of screening would-be refugees, such as asking them if they packed their own bags and if they plan to go all out jihad on us after they arrive here.

"We are very comfortable that we are bringing people in who will be a great plus to our country," Kerry said, referring to how they will encourage our schools to teach the wonders of Islamic customs and Sharia.

Kerry said that "not one event in the United States, of terror" has been committed by a refugee allowed to re-settle in the U.S. 

But it's too soon to spike the ball, Kerry. 

And besides, there have been instances where, for example, two Iraqi refugees were arrested in 2011 for plotting to assist Al Qaeda with weapons and money in order to fight American troops in Iraq. 

And again, it's too soon to tell if we've created our own terrorist problem at home.

Kerry got into his incessant repetition of phrases: "We believe . . . the people who are fleeing Syria are the most harmed by terrorism. They are parents. They are children. They are orphans. It is very important that we do not close our hearts to the victims of such violence" [as they will one day vote Democrat]. 

If illegal immigrants tended to vote Republican, there would be no illegal immigrants under a Democratic administration. I suspect the converse is also true, but the reality is, the Democrats have the market cornered on the immigrant scene.

The most disturbing fact is one that was mentioned above: ISIS has promised to infiltrate themselves among the refugees. 

And you can bet the farm that Mr. Kerry will not be having Syrian refugees living in his neighborhood. 


Tweet

Islamohaven: an allegory

A nice American couple recently had a guest arrive at their home. He was from the Middle East. The couple wanted to be good hosts and tried to accommodate him as best they could.

They gave him their largest guest bedroom, his own private washroom and complete privacy. He thanked the couple and turned in for the night--his first night in the West.

The next morning, the couple was having a breakfast: bacon and eggs, toast and jam, and coffee when the guest came down to join them.

"What is that horrible odor?" he asked the man's wife.
"I'm not sure what you're referring to," she answered.
"It smells like someone has been cooking swine."
"Oh, we're having bacon with our eggs. We know it isn't the healthiest of food, but we only have it on rare occasions with Sunday breakfast."
"It isn't about health; it makes me feel ill to smell it. I hope you will not cook it in the future," he said. "It offends me and goes against Sharia, which is the law of my religion."
"Oh, we're sorry--we didn't realize that," said the husband. "We'll make sure that we only cook it when you're gone from the house."
"No, the problem is that I cannot be in the same home that cooks swine. Is there no way you can eat your swine outside this wonderful home you have invited me into?"
"Okay. Bacon isn't all that important to us that we can't wait to eat it at a restaurant on the occasions we hunger for it," the wife said, smiling but feeling uncomfortable.
"Good," the guest said, and then went back to his room.

Another day passed and the couple heard sounds coming from the guest room. It sounded as if their guest was building something. They decided to check in on him to see what was going on.

When they got to the top of the stairs, they were met by the guest. He stood in front of the closed bedroom door, blocking the couple from entering the guest room.
"We heard some noise coming from up here," the husband said in a friendly tone, "and we just wanted to see what's going on."
"Nothing to see here," the guest replied. "I was just making a small prayer area while enjoying your hospitality." 
"Oh, sorry. We would never interfere with your religious practices," the husband said. "May we have a look to satisfy our curiosity?"
"Perhaps another time. I am very busy with the project now." The guest entered his room, closed the door and locked it.
The couple looked at each other both with confused expressions. 

They went downstairs and left for work while their guest stayed at home and enjoyed the conveniences the house had to offer.

A few weeks went by and by this time, the guest had really made himself "at home." While his hosts were at work, he spent a good part of his time praying, eating the Halal food bought for him by his hosts, and reading from the Quran.

Meanwhile, the husband and wife were feeling "put off" and somewhat upset with their guest. They believed he was taking advantage of their good will. In fact, the main reason they took him into their home in the first place was because they were told he was in danger if he stayed in his own country known as Islamohaven. 

Over time, the guest began acting more like the house he was staying in belonged to him and he began making demands. When the demands could not be met by the couple, he threatened to make trouble for them and even called a Muslim lawyer to send them a threatening letter.

Yes, he was an Islamohaven refugee but a lousy guest.



Tweet