The shrew and loser of two, HIllary, will run again in 2020

"It's a g*d*amn miracle!"

Is three a charm or will it be yet another loss for the wife of former President Bill Clinton and renowned worst candidate in the history of the world? The Wall Street Journal believes she's going to give the old feminazi try.  "Hillary Will Run Again," the headline read, and the subtitle "Reinventing herself as a liberal firebrand, Mrs. Clinton will easily capture the 2020 nomination."

Einstein said the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. Hillary Clinton is the Democrat's insanity.

The Mark Penn and Andrew Stein WSJ article read, "Get ready for Hillary Clinton 4.0. More than 30 years in the making, this new version of Mrs. Clinton, when she runs for president in 2020, will come full circle--back to the universal-health-care-promoting progressive firebrand of 1994. True to her name, Mrs. Clinton will fight this out until the last dog dies. She won't let a little thing like two stunning defeats stand in the way of her claim to the White House."

Penn, the person, not the tennis ball, is a pollster and senior adviser to Bill and Hillary Clinton from 1995 to 2008. Stein a former Democratic Manhattan Borough president and was also a member of the New York City Council.

The article talks about Clinton as if she is a computer whose software is simply being updated.

She's more like a hypocritical robot whose main claim to fame and her political capital is her husband. As a Secretary of State she was an incompetent fool whose arrogantly used her private server for highly classified government correspondence.

I just worry that when she loses for a third time, we're never going to hear the end of the myriad excuses and finger-pointing and how it wasn't her fault.

Hillary hates to campaign, and when she was asked on "Recode," Kara Swisher asked her "Do you want to run again?" She responded, "No, no," then added, "I'd like to be president."

Yes, she would like to be anointed or crowned president because she believes, for some reason, that it's her right.

Trump won the election, but Hillary helped him put it away.

Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

American majority support immigration restrictions & wall

Blocking traffic for Allah

A new poll indicates that a majority of voters support President Trump's executive order that temporarily halts immigration from 7 terrorist-spawning countries and want fewer refugees coming into the U.S. overall.

The poll was conducted for the Harvard Center for American Political Studies by the Harris Poll company. The poll is co-managed by Mark Penn, a Democratic pollster,

It was found that 51 percent of polled individuals want the U.S. to accept fewer than the current 100,000 per year that Obama wanted to import. The Trump administration's plan sets the number at half the Obama amount.

Fifty-three percent also support Mr. Trump's executive order banning all refugee resettlement from Syria and freezing all refugee resettlement for 120 days. 

Forty-seven percent of those polled oppose the new curbs on refugees coming into the U.S. according to Harris, but there was no data released to indicate the percentage of those who strongly support or oppose the curbs.

A regional judge's order (which was probably unconstitutional) halted Trump's refugee resettlement freeze but did not affect the halving of total refugee resettlement numbers. This action led to a mad dash into the U.S. from five of the seven terrorist-spawning countries. 

Thanks to this liberal judge, who will not be personally affected by his poor decision, 60.1 percent of refugees arriving since his ruling are from Iran, Iraq, Somalia, Syria and Sudan. Of the Syrian refugees, 99.6 percent are Muslims. Of the others, 55 percent are Muslims. 

This shows that the 45 percent non-Muslims who rushed here for resettlement do not think of this as a Muslim ban. 

The 500,000 refugees arriving in the U.S. since 2009 will cost the American taxpayers $4.1 billion for just this year alone. Breitbart News previously reported that "$4.1 billion can buy 10,677 new homes for $384,000 each, which is the average price of a new home sold in the United States in December 2016. Or it could buy 170,124 new autos for $24,100 each, which is the manufacturer's suggested retail price for a 2017 Chevrolet Malibu."

Sadly, most of the refugees are only capable of low-skilled employment and their presence here will take away thousands of jobs while bringing few useful skills.

A complete shutdown of all refugee resettlement would save us billions. They will continue costing us more in welfare and aid than they generate in taxes, according to uncomfortable facts, and cost us no less than $3 billion every year, not including the costs added on by the U.S. criminal justice system when they commit crimes and plot terror attacks.

The Trump refugee resettlement freeze has strong and broad support. A Feb. 8 Morning Consult poll found 55 percent of voters overall, supported the president's executive order. Of those, 82 percent of Republicans support it.

Another poll (McLaughlin & Associates) found 57 percent support a halt in order to implement better screening procedures.

Rasmussen Reports found 52 percent of voters favored a freeze on all refugee resettlement until the government can better screen out terrorists. Of this polling population, 57 percent were young voters.

The next big issue after terrorism will be which bathroom a person will be able to use depending upon the existence or absence of mental issues.





Tweet