PINO Biden to remove Trump rule protecting religious health care workers

What a POS our PINO is. 

Biden's puppet master [Ron Klain? Susan Rice?] wants to rescind Trump's protection of religious health care workers that allowed them to refuse to kill babies in the womb or perform genital mutilations on gender dysphoric people, including minors, even though it violates their conscience and moral beliefs.

A spokes-human for the Department of Health and Human Services (a branch of government that, like the Department of Justice, has become an oxymoron, like jumbo shrimp) confirmed to Politico on Tuesday that the administration is working to rescind the rule.

“HHS has made clear through the unified regulatory agenda that we are in the rule-making process,” the spokes-human said.

In other words, screw the First Amendment, do as you're told or else.

Trump issued the rule in 2018 and later blocked by the courts. It's intention was to allow religious liberty, especially regarding health care workers who morally and ethically opposed common transgender "treatments" for children, and for the killing of babies in the womb [aka "a woman's right to kill their baby in the womb"]. The latter goes against all Abrahamic religions and is viewed as a mortal sin by Catholics.

Politico said that Trump’s rule would have “allowed doctors, nurses, medical students, pharmacists and other health workers to refuse to provide abortions, contraception, gender affirming care, HIV and STD services, vasectomies or any procedure to which they object.”

Notice how the left plays with language. They use terms like "gender affirming care" rather than "genital mutilation on gender dysphoric minors." The use "pro-choice" when it applies to the mother [or birthing person, as idiots say] rather than considering the right to life of the unborn child.

The reality is that there are plenty of health care workers willing to perform the procedures the left cherishes so much, but they want to force their will upon those of us who morally object to those procedures. Where else have we heard of that? Hmm. . . 

In early April White House Press Secretary and MSNBC shill in waiting, Jen Psaki, said that lawmakers who are trying to protect minors from puberty blockers and transgender genital mutilation have been "put on notice" by the oxymoronic U.S. Department of Justice.

Where is the justice in pissing on the Bill of Rights?

“Alabama’s lawmakers and other legislators who are contemplating these … discriminatory bills have been put on notice by the Department of Justice and the Department of Health and Human Services that laws and policies preventing care that health care professionals recommend for transgender minors may violate the Constitution and federal law,” Psaki warned at a press briefing.

The ginger's comments were referring to Alabama banning doctors from mutilating children's penis and testicles, or breasts and vagina, or putting them on puberty blockers if they “identify” as the opposite sex because they are children and this isn't out of the ordinary, whereas 70% to 90% of them grow out of it. Alabama is also advancing parental rights by forbidding teachers’ “instruction” on sexuality and gender identity between kindergarten and fifth grade because that's not their freaking job.

Roger Severino, then-director of the HHS Office of Civil Rights, praised Trump’s “conscience” rule in 2019, when it was finalized.

“This rule ensures that healthcare entities and professionals won’t be bullied out of the health care field because they decline to participate in actions that violate their conscience, including the taking of human life,” he said, according to Christianity Today. “Protecting conscience and religious freedom not only fosters greater diversity in healthcare, it’s the law.”

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

Then-acting HHS secretary Eric Hargan said Trump’s move was a promise kept.

“President Trump promised the American people that his administration would vigorously uphold the rights of conscience and religious freedom,” Hargan said. “That promise is being kept today. The Founding Fathers knew that a nation that respects conscience rights is more diverse and more free, and OCR’s new division will help make that vision a reality.”

And then came along Joe Biden's administration and a president in name only who agrees to everything he is told to by his handler[s], because if you think Joe Biden is actually running the nation, then you probably also believe that Dr. Jill Biden should be Surgeon General like Joy Behar does.

Tweet

New evidence damning to Obama in phony Russiagate scandal

Fresh evidence unsealed in the Michael Flynn court battle confirms-not implies-that former President Barack Hussein Obama played a central role in moving forward the whole fake Russiagate "scandal" that rocked the entire country.

Handwritten notes by the disgraced former FBI agent Peter Strzok show that Obama and his comical side-kick, Joe Biden who played along, encouraged the FBI and Department of Justice to investigate Flynn, in spite of their knowledge told to them by the FBI that Flynn's actions "appear legit."

Of course, we should not be too hard with Biden as it's quite possible his mental status is similar to what it is today--lacking the analytical capacity to distinguish his derriere from his elbow.

Strzok notes the document of then FBI chief James "Lordy" Comey's account, which gives more detail of the January 5, 22017 meeting that included Obama, Biden, Comey, Susan Rice and Sally Yates. [Rice was then National Security Adviser and Yates was then Deputy Attorney General.]

On learning that the FBI was set to close its investigation into Flynn after finding no evidence of wrongdoing, Obama and Biden suggested finding ways to keep it open, with Biden bringing up the (dead letter) Logan Act, because he graduated at the bottom third of his law school and didn't realize how preposterous his idea was at the time.

The notes show Obama ordering the continued investigation be kept secret from the incoming Trump administration.  “Make sure you look at things and have the right people on it,” Obama ordered.

After Trump entered the White House, Comey and Yates were able to take out Flynn, thus sidelining White House oversight of the 

In the new administration, holdovers Comey and Yates did manage to take out Flynn, sidelining any effective White House oversight of the unprincipled Russiagate probe — and thus allowing it to grow like fungus.

Biden lied to ABC last month, “I know nothing about those moves to investigate Michael Flynn.” Still, it's possible he forgot as he has reached the point where he cannot identify his wife from his sister without assistance.

Serious-looking US Attorney John Durham is reviewing the origins of the Russiagate probe for signs of impropriety and unlawfulness. The report will hopefully be released to the public before the election in November.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Susan Rice believes the rioting is out of the Russian "playbooks"

Former Obama adviser Susan "It Was The Video" Rice blames the violent rioting on the Russians, or some "foreign actors," but insisted that the Russians might be involved with stirring up the chamber pot.

“I’m not reading the intelligence today, or these days—but based on my experience, this is right out of the Russian playbook,” the woman who went on all the Sunday talk shows to lie about the Benghazi attack, blaming on a video watched by a few hundred bored individuals.

Rice, who incompetently served as national security adviser to president Barack Hussein Obama, said this in a Compromised News Network (CNN) interview on Sunday, with Wolf "I Can Hardly Breathe" Blitzer. “But we cannot allow the extremists, the foreign actors, to distract from the real problems we have in this country that are longstanding, centuries old, and need to be addressed responsibly.”

It is unclear whether Rice had smoked a spliff before entering the interview but she sounded like she might have done a few deep tokes.

Saagar Enjeti of "Rising" a news show, tweeted about Rice's hallucination:

Absolutely Incredible: Obama's Former NSA Susan Rice on CNN talking about the protests and domestic strife
"This is right out of the Russian playbook" pic.twitter.com/luXiPV0bOq
— Saagar Enjeti (@esaagar)

Blitzer, who anchors the show responded, “you’re [puff] absolutely right on the foreign interference.” and then breathlessly asked Rice if she thought the Russians were attempting to “embarrass” the U.S. by “promoting the racial divide in our country.”

“Well we see it all the time, we’ve seen it for years, including on social media where they take any divisive, painful issue…and they play on both sides,” the dolt said. “I would not be surprised to learn that they have fomented some of these extremists on both sides on social media…[or] that they’re funding it in some way, shape, or form.”

Meanwhile, current National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien on Sunday pointed to a number of countries that were trying to instigate unrest via social media. The main country is China, but he also mentioned Russia, Iran, and Zimbabwe as possibly trying to enflame tensions through social media.

Pressed by former Obama leftist adviser  @GStephanopoulos about evidence that foreign adversaries are exploiting U.S. unrest, O’Brien pointed to social media activity from China “coming straight from the government.”

The pretense for the riots, as opposed to peaceful protests, was initiated by the death of George Floyd during his arrest on May 25 by former officer Derek Chauvin of the Minneapolis PD. Chauvin has been charged with murder 3 and sits in jail awaiting trial. 

The looting, burning of police vehicles, buildings, banks and small businesses, along with several deaths, were done in the honor of Floyd's memory, if you believe that crap.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Rice was told by Obama to write a CYA memo

Well, it turns out that former national security adviser Susan Rice was allegedly instructed by the Obama White House to write her memo about the Oval Office meeting with top officials regarding Michael Flynn, according to a report. The meeting also included Obama himself and Joe Biden.

The memo was written on the same day Donald Trump was sworn into office--January 20, 2017 and it concerned the meeting which took place two weeks prior.

On Wednesday, Fox News correspondent Gillian Turner reported  that Rice’s team confirmed to Fox News that “she was directed by White House Counsel to write the Jan 20, 2017 memorandum documenting an Oval Office meeting in which President Obama [and] National Security officials discussed Michael Flynn.”

Turner tweeted:

#BREAKING: @AmbassadorRice’s team confirms to #FoxNews that she was directed by White House Counsel to write the Jan 20, 2017 memorandum documenting an Oval Office meeting in which President Obama & National Security officials discussed #MichaelFlynn.
— Gillian Turner (@GillianHTurner)

“The meeting took place on January 5, 2017, and involved Rice, Obama, and Vice President Biden, the administration’s top political hierarchy on national-security matters, along with Obama’s top law-enforcement and counterintelligence officials, deputy attorney general Sally Yates (soon formally to take the acting AG role she was already performing), and FBI director James Comey,” former U.S. Attorney Andrew McCarthy wrote Wednesday. “Prior redactions had already demonstrated that the meeting’s central purpose was to discuss the rationale for withholding intelligence about Russia from the incoming Trump national-security team.”

Rice’s “TOP SECRET” memo from January 20, 2017, was declassified by the Acting Director of the U.S. National Intelligence Richard Grenell and it stated:

On January 5, following a briefing by IC leadership on Russian hacking during the 2016 Presidential election, President Obama had a brief follow-on conversation with FBI Director Jim Comey and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates in the Oval Office. Vice President Biden and I were also present. 

President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities “by the book”. The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book. 

From a national security perspective, however, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia. 

Director Comey affirmed that he is proceeding “by the book” as it relates to law enforcement. From a national security perspective, Comey said he does have some concerns that incoming NSA Flynn is speaking frequently with Russian Ambassador Kislyak. Comey said that could be an issue as it relates to sharing sensitive information. President Obama asked if Comey was saying that the NSC should not pass sensitive information related to Russia to Flynn. Comey replied ”potentially.” He added that he has no indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak, but he noted that “the level of communication is unusual.” 

The President asked Comey to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Comey said he would.

Attorney General William Barr debunked the claims that there was anything wrong with the communication Flynn had with the Russian ambassador.

"I was at the Iowa thing, leg hair corn pop"

“That call, there was nothing wrong with it whatever,” Barr said. “In fact, it was laudable. He– and it was nothing inconsistent with the Obama administration’s policies. And it was in U.S. interests. He was saying to the Russians, you know, ‘Don’t escalate.’ And they asked him if he remembered saying that, and he said he didn’t remember that.”

It was a case of Flynn doing his job.

McCarthy noted how Rice kept changing her story as more information became available. 

“Rice has gone from claiming to have had no knowledge of Obama administration monitoring of Flynn and other Trump associates, to claiming no knowledge of any unmaskings of Trump associates, to admitting she was complicit in the unmaskings, to — now — a call for the recorded conversation between retired general Michael Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak to be released because it would purportedly show that the Obama administration had good reason to be concerned about Flynn (y’know, the guy she said she had no idea they were investigating).”

Maybe the whole debacle over Flynn was simply due to a video.



Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

Lame-stream media slams POTUS for Fox News pick for UN job

If President Trump chose not to attend the funeral of George H.W. Bush the media would have called him insensitive and probably something like adolescent. He attended and all they could talk about was how he should not have been there.

Now the lame-stream media is blasting Trump's pick to replace Nikki Haley as UN Ambassador. Heather Nauert was the person he nominated and now they're questioning her qualifications and point out that he typically picks people who have worked at, or are currently working at Fox News.

It was okay when Obama nominated another journalist/communist, Samantha Powers, in 2013, for the same position, but hey, this is Donald Trump, and anything he does will be slammed by the leftist media.

Powers, 48, was a war correspondent for four years. She covered the Yugoslav Wars for the Boston Globe and U.S. News & World Report, as well as other publications. She was a columnist for Time while being director of a human rights center at Harvard.

She joined the Obama campaign in 2008, but was quickly forced to resign after she correctly observed Hillary Clinton to be a "monster" who was "stooping to anything" to win.

After Powers' nomination to the U.N. position, many Republicans supported her nomination such as Sens. Lindsey Graham, John McCain and independent Joe Lieberman. She was confirmed by a vote of 87-10 and served for over three years then succeeded by Nikki Haley.

But now that Trump has nominated as Haley's replacement Heather Nauert, a former Fox News journalist, the media has a problem with that.

Nauert has worked as a journalist for twenty years and also served as a government affairs consultant, working on issues such as Social Security, insurance and taxes, as well a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

This is not "What About-ism," it's about media bias.

In April last year, the U.S. Department of State announced that Nauert would become the department spokesperson. This past March, she was named Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs.

But Trump nominated her so the media has a problem with that.

The geniuses at the Comedy News Network (CNN) immediately called into doubt Nauert's skills. In a section of a news piece titled "Qualifications questioned," CNN cited a "senior diplomat" who said, "This is extraordinary. Especially in the footsteps of the former ambassadors: Madeleine Albright, Susan Rice."

Susan Rice? She went on the weekend morning shows lying about Benghazi being sparked by a video when, in fact, she knew it was a lie.

In a Washington Post piece headlined "The Foxification of the Trump White House, visualized," the super-liberal rag complained about the "remarkable bit of interplay between the administration and the network that is also the only one Trump has praised regularly since taking office ..." And Obama and the left constantly attacks.

In other words, it's really getting to them.

Former White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer, who served under George W. Bush, noted the hypocrisy. "More than 26 reporters went into the Obama Administration. I guess that was fine with the press back then, but not now," he tweeted.

Erik Wemple, a Washington Post "reporter", responded to Fleischer's tweet: "All right: Were they from the same cable-news network -- the same cable-news network that the president watches for hours and hours each day, and gets bogus information from?"

Fleischer ate his lunch, responding: "No, silly. Barack Obama had his pick of reporters from every network, newspaper and magazine. They almost all fell for him, and those who didn’t join his Administration loved him and gave him soft coverage for 8 years."

Bite it, Wemple.


Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do. Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah.




Tweet

Documents suggest coordination between FBI, CIA, Obama WH and Dems in Trump-Russia probe

Photo: Reuters

Text messages between FBI lovers/officials Lisa Page and Peter Strzok were recently uncovered suggesting a possible covert coordination between high-ranking officials at the Obama White House, Justice Department, CIA, FBI and former Senate Democratic leadership in the early days of the investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

According to investigators, the information provided to Fox News "strongly" suggests collusion between Obama's Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, then-Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (aka "Hairy Weed") and former CIA Director and possible closet Muslim John Brennan. This would clearly "contradict" the Obama administration's public claim about its hand in the process.

Photo: AP

A text by Lisa Page to Strzok on Aug. 2, 2016 read: 

"Make sure you can lawfully protect what you sign. Just thinking about congress, foia, etc. You probably know better than me."

The next day Strzok texted Page describing former FBI Deputy Director Andrew (Andy) McCable as being concerned with "information control" related to the initial investigation into Trump's campaign. Brennan was sent to Capitol Hill around the same time to brief members of Congress about possible election interference, according to the New York Times.

Five days later, Strzok texted Page:

"Internal joint cyber cd intel piece for D, scenesetter for McDonough brief, Trainor [head of FBI cyber division] directed all cyber info be pulled. I'd let Bill and Jim hammer it out first, though it would be best for D to have it before the Wed WH session."

"D" refers to since fired FBI Director James Comey and "McDonough" refers to Obama's Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, the GOP investigators said.

"We are not making conclusions. What we are saying is that the timeline is concerning enough to warrant the appointment of an independent investigator to look at whether or not the Obama White House was involved [in the Trump-Russia investigation]," a GOP congressional source told Fox News."

Of course, the CIA and FBI are independent agencies and are supposed to be non-partisan. Any coordination with the White House would be inappropriate.

Photo: AP

But does anyone doubt the existence of partisanship with Comey, Strzok, Page, Brennan and McCabe?

It seems as if they collectively believed they were being patriotic by thwarting Trump from remaining in office, that somehow it was their patriotic duty to get him impeached.

But alas, semi-useless Attorney General Jeff Sessions has now determined there will be no second special counsel and nobody will be held accountable in any of the aforementioned agencies.

And Hillary Clinton will never pay for her use of an illegal server. 

And Susan Rice will still be on the Netflix board of directors in spite of her lies and deception to the American public about Benghazi being inspired by a stupid video. 

And Obama will continue to make asinine, self-aggrandizing speeches about how there may one day be "a million Obamas." 

And Facebook will continue to farm our data to the Democrats.

And the sun will rise, and the sun will set, and nothing changes.



Tweet

Netflix names Susan "It-Was-a-Video" Rice to board of directors

Liberal video giant, Netflix, has named liberal Obama administration official and Benghazi propagandist, Susan Rice, to its board of directors. That's like naming  Louis Farrakhan as President of the Anti Defamation League.

Rice, 53, was U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and served 4 years as Obama's national security advisor. It was Rice who went on five Sunday morning news programs in 2012 claiming the assault on the Benghazi, Libya facility, which killed four Americans, was inspired by a video about Mohammad. 

That was a lie. It was a planned Islamic jihad attack. Lindsey Graham and John McCain were among members of the GOP who said Rice was doing the  morning appearances merely as a political cover-up to boost Obama for the upcoming election. Even Obama eventually admitted the attacks were pre-planned terrorism.

The idea of Rice being selected for the Netflix board of directors sounds like something coming right out of The Onion, except for the fact that it's a left-leaning satirical outlet.

"We are delighted to welcome Ambassador Rice to the Netflix board," said Netflix co-founder and CEO Reed Hastings. "For decades, she has tackled difficult, complex global issues with intelligence, integrity and insight and we look forward to benefitting from her experience and wisdom," [and her incredible ability to cover-up for anyone she works for, no matter how big the lie].

She replied to Hastings' comment: "I am thrilled to be joining the board of directors of Netflix, a cutting-edge company whose leadership, high-quality productions, and unique culture I deeply admire" [with shows that always contain at least one token gay, lesbian, transgender or queer scene of dudes and/or women in intimate circumstances swapping body fluids].

So I have decided to undertake the difficult and complex task of closing my account with Netflix. Actually, it was incredibly easy. I just went onto the site, clicked onto my Account, and found the Close Account button. Instead of checking any of the reasons they listed, I selection "Other" and then in the box wrote "Susan Rice".

It was extremely satisfying to do something that not only saves me a little money each month, but also makes a clear statement that I will not put up with a company that hires Susan Rice, a person who would lie to the American public and condemn someone in order to cover up for a secretary of state who did nothing to protect the facility at Benghazi when numerous times Ambassador Chris Stevens begged her for more security.

Susan Rice is the deplorable Hillary was really referring to.

Tweet

Senators shine a light on 'unusual' Susan Rice email on Russia probe

Former national security adviser Susan Rice sent an "unusual email" to herself on January 20, 2017--the day President Trump was sworn into office. What made it 'unusual' was that it documented President Obama's guidance at a high-level covert meeting about how law enforcement ought to investigate Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election, a pair of GOP senators said Monday.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and Sen. Lindsey Graham said the partially unclassified email was sent by Rice the day of Trump's inauguration and it seems to document a meeting with Obama, then-FBI Director James Comey, then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, then-Vice President and Chief Gaffer Joe Biden and Rice herself.

In the email, Rice wrote: "President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities 'by the book.' The president stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book."

And true to Obama form, the email reflects his guidance on sharing sensitive information with both the Russians and the incoming Trump administration.

So rather than sharing information with the incoming administration, Rice revealed that Obama said "he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia."

"The President asked Comey to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Comey said he would."

Grassley (R-Iowa), and Graham (R-SC), upon releasing the email Monday said that they uncovered it as part of their oversight of the FBI and the DOJ, and said it raises new questions.

"It strikes us as odd that, among your activities in the final moments on the final day of the Obama administration, you would feel the need to send yourself such an unusual email purporting to document a conversation involving President Obama and his interactions with the FBI regarding the Trump/Russia investigation," they said in a letter to Rice.

"In addition, despite your claim that President Obama repeatedly told Mr. Comey to proceed 'by the book,' substantial questions have arisen about whether officials at the FBI, as well as at the Justice Department and the State Department, actually did proceed 'by the book.'"

Perhaps Rice was told to 'cover their butts' by telling the FBI to go 'by the book.'

Certainly the Trump "dossier" wasn't 'by the book' nor was Fast and Furious, the Clinton private email server and the way Benghazi was mishandled. 

I believe they were writing the book as they plowed along.


Tweet

Former Obama advisers tell Trump how to handle Iran protests

Some key advisers to former "Lead from Behind" President Obama have attacked President Trump for supporting the Iran protests taking place for the past week. 

Valerie Jarrett, who left her heart in Tehran, Iran, was mute on the subject. That may be due to perverted allegiances to the Islamic Republic of Iran and her fear of being uncovered.

In 2009, the "Green Revolution" threatened Iran's theocratic regime, and Obama along with his administration lead from behind by not leading and not supporting the protesters. In effect, the Obama "behinders" supported the regime by not taking a stance. In fact, Obama said "we respect Iranian sovereignty and want to avoid the United States being the issue inside of Iran."

So of course, Obama's pussyfooting allowed the regime to consolidate power and put the revolution down. This was done selfishly, for Obama's crappy nuclear deal, which he believed was more important than the human rights of Iranian citizens. 

Proof that Obama is an immoral, self-serving megalomaniac.

President Trump is openly and vigorously supporting the protests and is 'attack-tweeting' against the regime:

Many reports of peaceful protests by Iranian citizens fed up with regime's corruption & its squandering of the nation's wealth to fund terrorism abroad. Iranian govt should respect their people's rights, including right to express themselves. The world is watching! #IranProtests

The entire world understands that the good people of Iran want change, and, other than the vast military power of the United States, that Iran's people are what their leaders fear the most...pic.twitter.com/W8rKN9B6RT

--Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 30, 2017

Oppressive regimes cannot endure forever, and the day will come when the Iranian people will face a choice. The world is watching! pic.twitter.com/kvv1uAqcZg

--Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 30, 2017 

Big protests in Iran. The people are finally getting wise as to how their money and wealth is being stolen and squandered on terrorism. Looks like they will not take it any longer. The USA is watching very closely for human rights violations!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 31, 2017

Iran, the Number One State of Sponsored Terror with numerous violations of Human Rights occurring on an hourly basis, has now closed down the Internet so that peaceful demonstrators cannot communicate. Not good!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 31, 2017

Iran is failing at every level despite the terrible deal made with them by the Obama Administration. The great Iranian people have been repressed for many years. They are hungry for food & for freedom. Along with human rights, the wealth of Iran is being looted. TIME FOR CHANGE!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 1, 2018

But some of Obama's people reject Trump's thinking and evidently think the former failed president's approach was better. And they're correct--if you're will to pray toward Mecca or die.

Former National Security Advisor Susan "It-Was-A-Video" Rice tweeted a New York Times op-ed by former Obama aide Philip Gordon, "How Can Trump Help Iran's Protesters? Be Quiet." 

Gordon contended that supporting the protesters and taking steps to end the Iran nuclear deal will delegitimize Iran's internal opponents.

How Can Trump Help Iran’s Protesters? Be Quiet. https://t.co/w0MNlWMkxG"— Susan Rice (@AmbassadorRice) December 31, 2017

John "Hair-plugs" Kerry had to pontificate his two cents tweeting:

With humility about how little we know about what’s happening inside Iran, this much is clear: it’s an Iranian moment and not anyone else’s. But the rights of people to protest peacefully and voice their aspirations are universal and governments everywhere should respect that.— John Kerry (@JohnKerry) December 31, 2017 

Ben Rhodes the former Deputy National Security Advisor who majored in English in college and an aspiring novelist, had nothing new to add in attacking President Trump. He criticized Americans who think the U.S. should encourage the protests:

The Iranian people are rightfully demanding dignity, less corruption, more opportunity, and greater control over their lives. In looking at US twitter, it seems lost on too many that this is about what Iranians want for Iran, and not about us.

— Ben Rhodes (@brhodes) December 31, 2017 

Tommy "Dude" Vietor, a former cool guy spokesboy for the National Security Council went to his default mode of sarcasm:

Trump loves protestors as long as they’re not American.— Tommy Vietor (@TVietor08) December 31, 2017

Former UN Ambassador and closet Communist Samantha Power, criticized Trump's immigration policy in this clever tweet:

We stand with the Iranian people so much that we won't let them come here. https://t.co/fzbv8idiiJ

       --Samantha Power (@SamanthaJPower) January 1, 2018

But not every Obama minion was on board with the anti-Trump sentiment. Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates admitted, in his 2014 book "Duty:  Memoirs of a Secretary at War," that while he had to be persuaded that "too powerful an American voice on behalf of the protesters might provide ammunition for the regime," he later rejected his words and said, "In retrospect, I think we could and should have done more, at least rhetorically." (328)

Maybe it's Obama's turn, along with his former administration, to just shut up.


Tweet

Bergdahl walks with dishonorable discharge

Garbage

The traitor who walked off his post 2009 in Afghanistan and had military personnel looking for him, some of whom were killed and others seriously injured for life, is getting a slap on the wrist. 

Bowe Bergdahl is getting no prison time and only a dishonorable discharge, which his lawyers are going to fight, they said. He has been demoted to private and will probably write a memoir which the left will gladly purchase.

"He served with honor and distinction," then National Security Advisor Susan Rice said of Bergdahl. She was also the person who, on five Sunday morning TV shows, blamed a video for the attack on the compound in Benghazi.

It turns out the honor she referred to was how he honored the Taliban, and the distinction was how he was distinctly a traitor.

President Trump, who had his Twitter account restored after a disgruntled employee shut it down for eleven minutes, tweeted:

"The decision on Sergeant Bergdahl is a complete and total disgrace to our Country and to our Military."

Bergdahl walked out of court Friday a free scumcrumpet after pleading guilty to endangering his comrades. He was fined, reduced to the rank of E1 and dishonorably discharged. That was all.

As part of his slap on his weak wrist, he will forfeit his pay of $1,000 per month for ten measly months.

The private was shaking and seemed emotional as the verdict was read. It is not known if he plans to have a sex change procedure but if he does, it's obvious the left will see him as an even bigger hero than they see him now.

In a moment of complete incomprehensible illogic, Bergdahl's defense attorney, Capt. Nina Banks, said it would not be justice to rescue Bergdahl from the Taliban "only to place him in a cell" now. She believes he has been punished enough and "paid a bitter price for the choices that he made."

So did a lot of dead and injured-for-life military people.

A psychiatrist testified that the scumcrumpet's decision to walk into the arms of the Taliban because he hated the United States was influenced by schizotypal personality disorder that made it difficult for him to understand the consequences of his traitorous actions that got people killed. That, coupled with post-traumatic stress disorder caused in part by a difficult childhood, should be reason enough to allow him to walk free with only a dishonorable discharge.

POS Bergdahl's thinking wasn't as clouded as the pseudo shrink asserted. After he was traded by Obama for five high-ranking, now missing, Taliban members, he said he walked off his post to draw attention to problems with his unit, describing to an investigating officer how he saw the missing-soldier alert unfolding. He also said the call goes "all the way up to Army command, it goes to Air Force, it goes to Marines . . . It goes to every high point and everybody finds out about it."

And this is why Trump is president.



Tweet

McMaster has more problems than just his anti-Israel stance

Current National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster has miffed some Trump administration people after it was revealed he sent a letter to Susan "It Was A Video" Rice giving her ongoing access to classified information.

McMaster is already a noted anti-Zionist (aka anti-Semite) and Arab supporter in every facet of support that Trump opposes, but for some unfathomable reason, he still has a job. 

He fired several people (seven in total thus far) who are pro-Israel, and most recently dumped the Trump loyalist, Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the senior director for intelligence at the National Security Council.

Circa reported Thursday that McMaster sent a letter to Rice giving her access to classified material, just weeks after her alleged role was disclosed in 'unmasking' identities of Trump associates in intelligence reports.

But for some unfathomable reason, he still has a job.

However, Fox News learned by National Security Council sources, that the letter is a pro forma document similar to those every living former national security adviser and former president is sent, and he was required to send it. 

Perhaps that's a requirement that needs  further analysis.

Fox News was also told that just because her security clearance was extended, that doesn't mean she gets to look at classified information or 'unmask' Trump staffers. All it means is that she can be called back (if need be) to discuss classified information and provide more bull crap to the media.

However, the fact that McMaster sent the lying Rice lizard the letter doesn't sit well with members of the Trump administration, who aren't big fans of the anti-Israel jerk. 


Tweet

Obama official made 'hundreds of unmasking requests'

In the final year of Obama's failed presidency, one of his officials made "hundreds of unmasking requests" according to a letter from a top Republican who raised concerns that the requests were made for "improper purposes."

"Unmasking" refers to a formal request to identify Americans in an intelligence document.

Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the House Intelligence Committee Chairman, has questioned whether the unmasking was improperly sought by Obama officials in unmasking the names of the Trump transition team.

The person he seemed to be referring to regarding the hundreds of unmasking requests is Samantha Power. 

"[T]his Committee has learned that one official, whose position has no apparent intelligence-related function, made hundreds of unmasking requests during the final year of the Obama Administration," Nunes wrote to Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats.

Nunes wrote that only one request "offered a justification that was not boilerplate and articulated why" the identity was needed for official duties.

Three top Obama administration officials were specifically named: Former CIA director John Brennan; former national security adviser Susan "It Was The Video" Rice; and former U.N. ambassador Samantha Power.

David Pressman, Power's lawyer, stressed that her responsibilities in her capacity as a member of the National Security Council but said she will cooperate with Congress.

"Ambassador Power strongly supports any bipartisan effort to address the serious threat to our national security posed by Russia's interference in our electoral process, and is eager to engage with the Senate and House committees on the timeline they have requested," he wrote. "While serving as our Permanent Representative to the United Nations and as a member of the National Security Council responsible for advising the President on the full-range of threats confronting the United States, and long before receiving an invitation to engage the Congressional committees, Ambassador Power was unambiguous about her support of bipartisan efforts to determine the full extent of this threat to our national security."

Which is why she unmasked as many Donald Trump campaign team personnel that she could get away with and not raise eyebrows.

Nunes' letter said he plans to introduce a bill requiring "individual, fact-based justifications" for unmasking requests.

"Cabinet members and other senior political leaders cannot be permitted to continue to seek access to U.S. person information within disseminated intelligence reports without documenting a specific, fact-based requirement for the information," he wrote.

Nunes said that "Obama-era officials sought the identities of Trump transition officials within intelligence reports" without offering any "meaningful explanation" as to why they needed or how they would use the information.

Nunes is concerned the information could be used for nefarious purposes, including leaking. He even noted that some of the requests were "followed by anonymous leaks of those name to the media."

So it walks and quacks like a duck.


Tweet

Susan Rice: "It's onnaconna I'm a black woman"

Poor little Miss Susie Rice, the Obama national security adviser. She is being scrutinized over her alleged involvement in the "unmasking" of Trump associates during the 2016 presidential election in which Donald Trump destroyed Hillary Clinton and made millions of fluffer-nutters cry uncontrollably to the delight of millions.

Rice is suggesting in a recent interview that her race and gender might be playing a role in the close scrutiny she's facing.

In other words, she's pulling both the race card and gender card out of her fat wallet and crying "You're not being fair to me, a poor, defenseless black woman who means no harm."

"Why me? Why not Jay Carney, for example, who was then our press secretary who stood up more?" she said as the proverbial bus came speeding by with Carney's body under it.

Maybe she has a point and perhaps Carney too should be investigated. By why not her? The gender card is really an indication that the person pulling it actually doesn't see men and women as equal.

Rice, you may recall, went on the Sunday talk shows knowing she was lying when she said the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack was caused by a video.

I could go on, but too much Rice can make you sick, unless it's Condoleezza.



Tweet

Susan Rice pulls a "Master Sergeant Schultz"

Former National Security Adviser and abject liar Susan Rice appeared on CNN's "Fareed Zakaria GPS" Sunday. 

Zakaria, a known plagiarist, interviewed Rice. She denied claims that she was the one who unmasked Americans in order to embarrass Trump campaign officials who were incidentally surveilled in the Russian collusion investigation.

She told the far left-leaning plagiarist that she never did anything "untoward with respect to the intelligence" she received on the Trump campaign, which defies her original story where she denied knowing anything whatsoever about the "incidental collection of intelligence" on Trump transition officials.

The "Adviser Liar" told Judy Woodruff, PBS NewsHour host in March, "I know nothing about this" and "I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that account today."

But now she admits she got the information but didn't do anything with it.

Of course not--she never lies very--much.

"I think now we've had subsequently members of Congress on the intelligence committees on both sides of the aisle take a look at the information that apparently was the basis for Chairman Nunes' concern, and say publicly that they didn't see anything that was unusual or untoward," Rice contended, likely referring to anonymous House and Senate sources who claimed she did nothing wrong.

"I did my job, which was to protect the American people, and I did it faithfully and to the best of my ability, and never did I do anything that was untoward and with respect to the intelligence I received," she lied.

The problem is, her job was not to protect the American people nor conduct investigations in the way she claims--that's for the FBI, NSA and CIA to do. 

She might consider changing her name to Master Sergeant Schultz.

To follow Brain Flushings, please click the Follow tab in the right margin.


Tweet

Congress digs deeper into 'unmasking' probe over Rice role

The 'unmasking' controversy investigation by the House and Senate intelligence committee is going deeper into the bowels of Susan Rice's involvement of who released the names of those Americans citizens to the public. They will be examining whether other lawmakers or candidates beyond President Trump's associates were affected.

Thus far, the investigation explored how the identities and communications of the Trump transition team were collected by U.S. intelligence agencies and then revealed to, and disseminated among high-ranking members of the Obama administration.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) plans to audit files from the National Security Agency (NSA) and White House to discover whether conversations and identities of presidential candidates, or members of Congress, were also swept up during NSA's surveillance of foreign leaders.

Nunes also will review whether the Obama National Security Council and White House counsel collected and distributed the information for reasons unrelated to foreign intelligence (and probably for political reasons).

"We will be performing an accounting of all unmasking for political purposes focused on the previous White House administration," one committee member told Fox News. "This is now a full-blown investigation."

Senate committee staffers have also broadened their investigation to determine whether presidential candidates were unmasked and information was misused. It is a felony to unmask the names of American citizens. They also want to find out what role Susan Rice, among others, played following reports that she requested Trump-affiliated names be unmasked. 

For a private American citizen to be 'unmasked' in an intelligence report is quite rare and usually done only if it has some foreign intelligence value. Thus, it is typically done if the American is a suspect in a crime, is in personal danger, or has to be named to explain the context of the intelligence report.

If it is found that Rice unmasked those names and leaked them to the media, she should, but likely will not, go to prison. (For more on this reasoning, see Hillary Clinton and Benghazi.)


Tweet

Susan "Four Pinocchio" Rice

Susan Rice does not have a close relationship with Truth. She thinks Truth is a fickle friend who changes opinions as often as Hillary Clinton comes up with a new excuse for losing a presidential election to a TV personality. 

Just a few months ago Rice claimed Bashar al-Assad (the 'ad' is silent) regime "voluntarily and verifiably" gave up its stockpile of chemical weapons. On Monday, The Washington Post fact-checker gave Rice "four pinocchios"--the absolutely worst rating on the truth scale, or best rating on the lying scale, depending how you see the glass.

"The reality is that there were continued chemical-weapons attacks by Syria," the left-leaning tabloid wrote.

Another so-called fact-checking website, PolitiFact, also retracted its "mostly true" rating they assigned to a 2014 claim from then-Secretary of State John "Hair-plugs" Kerry that "100 percent" of those weapons were removed from Syria.

But that was back in 2014 when truth didn't matter as much in the Obama administration.

Rice's claim, on the other hand, was more recent and under a new administration where truth matters a little more, depending on who's doing the talking. She told NPR that the Obama administration was able to "find a solution" on Syria that didn't require the use of force when Obama's 'red line' was crossed--Obama dealt with it using diplomacy.

But diplomacy worked no better than Obamacare. Both were miserable failures, as was both terms of his presidency.

"We were able to get the Syrian government to voluntarily and verifiably give up its chemical weapons stockpile," Rice claimed falsely.

Unfortunately, Assad was able to scrounge up enough sarin nerve gas to kill dozens of his own people, which prompted President Trump to smack him down with 59 Cruise Tomahawk missiles at the airfield from where the gas was flown.

The Washington Post wrote "the Obama administration had a tendency to oversell what was accomplished, perhaps because Obama received so much criticism for not following through on an attack if Syria crossed what Obama had called 'a red line.'"

"The reality is that there were continued chemical-weapons attacks by Syria--and that U.S. and international officials had good evidence that Syria had not been completely forthcoming in its declaration and possibly retained sarin and VX nerve agent," the Post wrote.

In other words, Rice and Kerry lied to make Obama sound as if he had 'a pair' leading from the front.

Using Rice's words, the Post column ruled: "She did not explain that Syria's declaration was believed to be incomplete and thus was not fully verified--and that the Syrian government still attacked citizens with chemical weapons not covered by the 2013 agreement. That tipped her wordsmithing toward a Four."



Tweet

Rice afraid to testify after series of lies

If Susan Rice meets you on the street and says "Good morning," she is lying.

Rice is facing growing demands for her to testify under oath, but in order to do that, a fireproof Bible will be needed because it just might go up in flames. 

The former Obama official is accused of ordering the unmasking of Trump officials under surveillance and she has finally admitted it after lying about it in a TV interview. But she said in an interview on MSNBC that she never did it for political purposes. 

"The allegation is that somehow Obama administration officials utilized intelligence for political purposes," she said, adding "that is absolutely false."

Translation: it is probably true because she was emphatic when she said it.

She also said that it is sometimes "necessary" for investigative purposes. So why did she originally lie about it?

For the same reason she said the 2012 attack on the Benghazi compound was caused by a video slamming prophet Mohammad. For the same reason she said that alleged deserter and Army puss-bag, Bowe Bergdahl, served with "honor and distinction." The reason is she, like Hillary Clinton, cannot keep themselves from lying. It's how they both roll.

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) a member of the Senate Judiciary and Select Committee on Intelligence said in a tweet Tuesday that Rice "needs to testify under oath."

What Cornyn is forgetting is that Rice will probably plead the Fifth Amendment or perhaps be bold enough to lie, as is her wont. Her slogan is: "Oath schmoath. Who cares?"

Cornyn included a link to a Wall Street Journal article "Susan Rice Unmasked." It suggests that she personally sought the name of at least one Trump official in intelligence reports concurrent to when reports on Russia were allegedly being circulated broadly, said a former intelligence official as reported by Fox News.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) also serves on the Judiciary Committee. He told Fox News that while he doesn't know why Rice acted improperly, "when it comes to Susan Rice, you need to verify, not trust."

He's exactly right.  But he also said that he doesn't want to form an opinion just yet. "There's a way to find out," Graham said. "I intend to find out."

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said that Rice "ought to be under subpoena," adding that the stories coming out about her are "actually eerily similar to what Trump accused them of, which is eavesdropping on conversations for political reasons."

He also suggested she needs to be asked whether she communicated with Obama directly about the surveillance information.

So was Rice merely doing her job, or was she doing a job for Obama?

[Please follow me by clicking the link above.]



Tweet

It's Rice who uncovered the covered

The lady who brought us the scoop on Benghazi, informing us the attack of the American compound was caused by a video, and that Bowe Bergdahl "served with honor and distinction" in the Army, is now the focus of the ongoing investigation into Russia's involvement with the 2016 election, and the unmasking of names of Americans caught up in NSA surveillance. 

That lady is Susan Rice.

It wasn't a video that started the terrorist attack and Bergdahl is currently facing court martial charges of desertion and misbehavior before the enemy for allegedly walking off his post in Afghanistan and being a traitorous pus biscuit.

Rice, the former national security adviser (which, when you think of it, is an oxymoron) under then-President Obama, was the person who requested to unmask the names of the Trump transition officials in the surveillance. She denied this last month in an interview.

The unmasked names made the rounds: to all at the Defense Department, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, and former Rice deputy Ben Rhodes.

It's even possible some of the names were placed on milk cartons to be distributed across the nation, but we're still checking on that.

The names were ostensibly part of incidental electronic surveillance of then-candidate and President-elect Trump and those close to him, including family members. This began up to a year before he took office.

White House Press Secretary and butt of SNL jokes, Sean Spicer, was asked about the revelations at the Monday press briefing but declined to comment on the role Rice may have played or what her motives might be.

"I'm not going to comment on this any further until [congressional] committees have come to a conclusion," Spicer said. He made note of how the media doesn't appear interested in the Rice revelation as much as it is with the possible Trump-Putin links.

Names in this situation are supposed to be masked (redacted from reports) whether it's international or domestic collection. The only time it can be unmasked is when it's an issue of national security, crime, or if the security of the individual whose name was unmasked  is in any danger. There are loopholes and names can be unmasked through backchannels, but Americans are supposed to be protected from incidental collection, and Mike Flynn, for example, was unmasked and illegally revealed to the public. 

Last month, in a TV interview with Dr. Evelyn Farkus (whose brother Marcus Farkus runs a Marcus Farcus focus group) said in part: "I was urging my former colleagues and, frankly speaking, the people on the Hill--it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can, before President Obama leaves the administration." 

Perhaps it was no coincidence that just as Obama and his crew left office, he approved new rules giving the NSA much broader powers by relaxing the rules about sharing intercepted personal communications and the ability to share the communications with 16 (!) other intelligence agencies. 

This makes it even harder to determine who in any intelligence agency is leaking things illegally. 

Think of it as Obama-style camouflage.

Tweet

Problem solved: shortage of Syrian-born terrorists no longer an issue

It was beginning to look like France, Germany, England and basically most of the EU had the market cornered on Syrian refugee terrorists, but not anymore. The Barack Hussein Obama White House said on Monday that it will admit 10,000 Syrians this fiscal year, just as he pledged.

ISIS had also pledged to infiltrate the hordes of "refugees" coming into the USA with their jihadists, and while they might do many bad things to innocent people, ISIS tends to mean what they threaten.

So, if ISIS can sneak one terrorist in for, say, every one hundred refugees, that would translate to 100 terrorists, and that's bound to be enough terrorists to wreak havoc on the nation.

If the 100 or more terrorists"do their thing," the United States is bound to catch up with the EU and will gain as much sympathy as the rest of Europe. The Olympic gold medals was just the start to the number of terrorist attacks we may withstand--we might break a world record.

Obama has also pledged to stand with the Muslims "if things get ugly," and he wasn't referring to Michelle's 'angry face.' At least we know that he's not worried if the proverbial feces hits the fan--he's got armed security to protect him.

Initially, the U.S. had been off to a slow start with taking in refugees, but now the administration was able to hit its goal about a month early and only a few weeks before our so-called president convenes a summit on refugees at the 71st session of the UN General Assembly.

Susan Rice, who now goes by the title of National Security Adviser, said that President Obama understands the important message that expanding the Syrian refugee and terrorist admissions would send, not just to the Syrian people that are trapped by a chinless dictator, but to ISIS and the rest of the world community. 

Rice had also said that it was a video that led to the Benghazi attack.

Many Syrians have fled to come to the United States, a country they used to hate but now see for its good earning potential. Many of the "refugees" are young men of military age who have refused to stand up and fight for their country.

President Obama wants to make sure that they are rewarded.



Tweet

Traitor Bowe to get a general court martial

Army Sgt. Bowe-Allahu-Akbar-Bergdahl has been making news lately when he did a series of podcasts that I blogged about here, but now his high profile case is making the news again. 

You may recall, if you don't get your news from Slate.com, that President Barack Hussein Obama released five high-profile Taliban leaders from Guantanamo Bay for Bergdahl. You may also recall that this Army deserter's "man-bun," Islamic-style beard-wearing father and hippy dippy mother were honored at the White House by Barack, and how the father of this deserter spoke to Bowe in Arabic and thanked everyone, except for the families of those who died looking for his son's traitorous ass.

 (I have provided the video for your emetic entertainment, just in case you didn't get to see it last year.)

Bergdahl was later charged with desertion and misbehavior before the enemy, accused of abandoning his post before he was captured.

Now, the U.S. Army Forces Command finally said today that both charges are being referred to a general court-martial--a hearing date is to be set, and the hearing will take place at Fort Bragg, N.C.

Bergdahl's lawyer, Eugene Fidell, complained that the convening authority didn't follow the advice of the preliminary hearing officer (who was probably following the advice of the White House) that the case be move to a special misdemeanor-level military court. 

Perhaps the convening authority decided to not move the trial there in favor of true justice.

Trading the five Taliban leaders for a deserter (who went from Private to Sergeant by default while in captivity) created tension between the American majority along with Congress, and our so-called Commander in Chief, a president who doesn't even have the command of knowledge regarding the number of states there are in the nation he presides over.

Some in Congress said they were not properly informed of the trade deal with the Taliban and that the trade raised serious security concerns. 

Of course, they were right in being concerned as it was discovered that some of the Taliban Five returned to the battle front, doing their Islamic jihad best to kill Americans. 

Congress was supposed to be given a 30-day notice by our incompetent administration to inform them of the transfer of the Gitmo detainees to Qatar. 

But Congress was not given this notice and that is against the law, which Obama apparently believes does not pertain to him.

So it seems that Susan Rice, our so-called National Security Adviser, jumped the proverbial gun last year when stating that Bergdahl "served with honor and distinction." This turned out to be just as truthful as when she said that a video caused the spontaneous Benghazi attacks that killed four Americans, one of whom was Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Have you noticed how similar the names "Benghazi" and "Bergdahl" are to each other?


Tweet