Gov. Youngkin responds to Trump's viral rant

Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) was asked about a racist-sounding comment made by former President Trump [I don't think Trump is a racist, but the comment seemed to lean in that direction] that seemed to come out of the blue.

Specifically, Trump wrote on his social media site, Truth Social, “Young Kin (now that’s an interesting take. Sounds Chinese, doesn’t it?) in Virginia couldn’t have won without me.” 

“I Endorsed him, did a very big Trump Rally for him telephonically, got MAGA to Vote for him – or he couldn’t have come close to winning. But he knows that, and admits it. Besides, having a hard time with the Dems in Virginia – But he’ll get it done!” Trump posted about Youngkin.

Youngkin refused to engage in the game when reporters tried to goad him later in the day.

“First of all I didn’t see it,” Youngkin said in a clip posted to Twitter by WRIC-TV reporter Jackie DeFusco.

Even if he did see Trump's post, he gave reporters the right reply. “Listen, you all know me. I do not call people names. I really work hard to bring people together and that’s what we’re working on,” he said.

Youngkin indicated he did not want to hear the post read because he's obviously too intelligent to get into the mud to wrestle with Trump and satisfy reporters looking to make big news.

“That’s not the way I roll, and not the way I behave,” he said. “This is a moment for us to come together.’

The grownups have entered the room, boys and girls.

Virginia came on Trump’s radar after a Thursday comment by Youngkin's Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, that Trump might be more a part of the GOP’s past than its future. Imagine how angry that must have made the former President.

“What we saw was, even though he wasn’t on the ballot, he was, because he stepped in and endorsed candidates,” Earle-Sears said, according to The Washington Post.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Critical Race Theory, ignorance, The New York Times, and bovine flatulence. You also help me and the orphans. Thanks.

* * *

“And yet, it turns out that those he did not endorse on the same ticket did better than the ones he did endorse. That gives you a clue that the voters want to move on. And a true leader knows when they have become a liability to the mission,” she said.

So what do you think? Is Trump part of the GOP's past or will he still be part of its future? Feel free to comment.

Tweet

Here we go again: letter emerges casting doubt on NY Times "reports"

When you call a former reputable newspaper "fake news," you're wandering into dangerous territory. The one freedom most important for national freedom is that of the press, and naturally free speech and the right to protect ourselves to ensure it. But it's no secret that whenever the media makes a mistake, it is always in the same direction--it first accuses the president or those on the right of wrongdoing, only later to retract the story after the world has read the lies. And the retractions are often buried somewhere in the paper where it's hardly read.

It's "here we go again" with the New York Times. [H/T Daily Wire]

A letter emerged into the light of day late on Monday from the Australian government. It disputed the New York Times report claiming that President Trump "pushed" Australia to help AG William Barr investigate the origins of the Mueller Russia investigation. The former newspaper was trying to "discredit" the investigation in what they said was an example of the president of "using high-level diplomacy to advance his personal political interests."

The letter stated:

Dear Attorney General,

I refer to President Trump’s announcement on 24 May that you will investigate the origins of the Federal Bureau of Investigations probe into Russian links to the 2016 US election. 

I note that the President referred to Australia, the United Kingdom and the Ukraine as potential stakeholders. Moreover, I note that he has declassified intelligence material to support your investigation. 

The Australian Government will use its best endeavors to support your efforts in this matter. While Australia’s former High Commissioner to the United Kingdom, The Hon. Alexander Downer, is no longer employed by the government, we stand ready to provide you with all the relevant information to support your inquiries. 

The Acting White House Chief of Staff, The Honorable Michael Mulvaney, has been copied on this letter. 

Yours sincerely,
The Hon Joe Hockey

The current development came to light after the Times suggested it was a scandal for the president to ask Australia to cooperate with an ongoing investigation by the Department of Justice into the Russian investigation regarding the 2016 presidential election.

Shortly after The Times’ report was published, a source at the DOJ pushed back on it, telling Fox News: “The countries have been helpful. There was no pressing required.”

“The president was letting the heads of other countries know that the attorney general would be contacting the appropriate law enforcement entities in each country, according to the DOJ official. When Barr was in Italy last week, he did talk to law enforcement officials there about Durham’s review, Fox News was told,” the network added. “The DOJ official also stressed that this has been a routine procedure in diplomacy and that Barr would not usually reach out to his direct counterpart in another country unilaterally. Instead, usually there would be an introduction of sorts made at the head-of-state level.”

The load of new information regarding the DOJ’s investigation included recent reporting from The Washington Post, which attempted to cast AG Barr in a negative light for conducting his job, claiming that he was trying to help Trump “discredit” Mueller’s investigation.

They are doing this in an attempt to neutralize Barr's credibility so when he finds nothing impeachable, they can claim he's in Trump's back pocket.

The new and relevant information from The Post’s report was the revelation that Barr has been in contact with British intelligence officials and has traveled to Italy as a part of the ongoing investigation.

“Barr has already made overtures to British intelligence officials, and last week the attorney general traveled to Italy, where he and Durham met senior Italian government officials and Barr asked the Italians to assist Durham, according to one person familiar with the matter,” The Post reported. “It was not Barr’s first trip to Italy to meet intelligence officials, the person said. The Trump administration has made similar requests of Australia, these people said.”

In May, Trump said regarding AG Barr: “And I hope he looks at the U.K., and I hope he looks at Australia, and I hope he looks at Ukraine. I hope he looks at everything because there was a hoax that was perpetrated on our country.”

The DOJ’s investigation into the origins of the Russia probe is being led by U.S. Attorney John Durham.

The games have begun and Joe Hockey has dropped the puck.


Please consider following this blog and feel free to click on the ads on this page. It costs nothing, and may just save your life. Or not. But seriously, please check out the ads as this is my source of generating revenue. And you can also see my blog on the Times of Israel.




Tweet

You gotta love Trump's trolling of the left on immigration

Seriously, if you were president of the United States, how could you not do what Trump is threatening to do to the left? He is doubling down on a plan to ship migrants out to sanctuary cities and says the "Radical Left" should be happy.

You have to admit, no other presidency in our history has been as much wild and crazy fun as this one.

President Trump responded to reports Friday that his administration proposed releasing immigrant detainees in sanctuary cities by not only confirming the plan but saying it remains under “strong” consideration. Seriously. This is Trump at his Trump best.

Furthermore, Trump tweeted that relocating illegal immigrants to these districts should make the "Radical Left" happy. Especially Nancy "Macarena Hands" Pelosi. The left would be helping those poor, innocent children and provide a sanctuary for immigrants who would otherwise live with the threat of deportation or having to answer to the law for other crimes.

The comments came after The Washington Post initially reported that the White House proposed sending the immigrant detainees to sanctuary cities twice in the last six months.

The proposal was first brought up in November amid reports of a large migrant caravan from Central American making its way to the southern border. The idea was again considered in February, amid the standoff with Congress over a border wall.

The Post said the plan was shot down both times. But on Friday, Trump signaled the proposal isn't dead.

Trump tweeted:

“Due to the fact that Democrats are unwilling to change our very dangerous immigration laws, we are indeed, as reported, giving strong considerations to placing Illegal Immigrants in Sanctuary Cities only.” 

“The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy—so this should make them very happy!”

The president doubled down as Democrats fumed over the relocation idea.

“The extent of this Administration’s cynicism and cruelty cannot be overstated,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s spokeswoman Ashley Etienne said in a statement Friday. “Using human beings—including little children—as pawns in their warped game to perpetuate fear and demonize immigrants is despicable, and in some cases, criminal.”

Say what??? Why is it warped? Trump is simply giving the left the opportunity to put their money where their mouths are.

Pelosi added: “The American people have resoundingly rejected this Administration’s toxic anti-immigrant policies, and Democrats will continue to advance immigration policies that keep us safe and honor our values.”

You would think she would be open to the idea of providing succor to the immigrants.

Pelosi’s district—San Francisco—was among the sanctuary cities where the administration considered sending detainees. When it came right down to it, she wanted no part in helping those poor children. In fact, the Democrats refused to allocate funding for an increase in beds at the border. They want the immigrants released into the communities . . . just not theirs.

Now that's blatant hypocrisy.


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Dem. Kamala Harris may lose her seat on Senate Judiciary Committee

The GOP is considering reducing the size of the 21-member Senate Judiciary Committee as they prepare for the next Congress.

If this should happen, Sen. Kamala "The Interrupter" Harris, (D-Calif.), a possible candidate for the 2020 presidential campaign, could be booted from the panel, according to a hopeful report.

This is due to the fact that she is a first-term senator and the most junior and obnoxious member. She would be the first to go, but whether or not she goes quietly remains to be seen.

Some butt-kissing Democrats are reportedly scrambling to find a way to keep Harris on the committee, the report said. The ideas include negotiating with Republicans -- who maintained control of the chamber after this month's midterm elections -- to keep the committee at 21 members, or convincing a more senior Democrat to step aside. If the Republicans agree, then they deserve what they get and just watch what happens in 2020 to the GOP.

Although she has been a U.S. senator for less than two years, Harris – a former state attorney general in California – drew attention during the summer for her questioning of Brett Kavanaugh during his Supreme Court confirmation hearings. She could not have been more infuriating as she would ask a question then not allow Kavanaugh to answer it.

Harris and Kavanaugh had a heated exchange over whether he discussed the Russia investigation being conducted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller with anyone at a law firm associated with President Trump’s personal lawyer. It was a trick question designed to make him look guilty, rather than a question in pursuit of the truth as to whether he perpetrated sexual misconduct when he was a teenager.

“I think you’re thinking of someone and you don’t want to tell us,” Harris said as if she was a mindreader.

In September, the Washington Post gave the annoying senator a rating of Four Pinocchios, because she selectively edited a video of Kavanaugh comments about abortion-inducing drugs, in a bid to argue that he was against birth control.

Harris told Senate Minority Leader Chuck "Nostril Caves" Schumer, (D-N.Y.), that she wants to keep her Judiciary spot, her spokeswoman Lily Adams told the Post. It keeps her in the spotlight when the committee goes on TV.

Her supporters say that Harris, 54 – by being half Jamaican-American and half Tamil Indian – helps Democrats underscore that the GOP side of the committee includes only white males.

“Not only would it be unconscionable to remove the only African-American woman from the committee, but Sen. Harris also is the most skilled questioner on the entire panel,” Brian Fallon, executive director of Demand Justice, a group tries to get liberal judges appointed, told the Post.

She is not actually the most skilled, if she were, she wouldn't need to ask trick questions. She is the most obnoxious, sneering and sneaky person on the committee.

But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., is said to be considering Sen.-elect Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., for a Judiciary seat, the Post reported. 

According to the Post, serious discussions about the makeup of the committee will begin sometime after Tuesday’s Senate run-off election in Mississippi.


Hello fellow conservatives. Please click the "Follow" button in the margin to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

Will DHS secretary Nielsen get the ax?

It has been reported that President Trump has made the decision to fire Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen within the next several weeks due to his frustration with her "performance" on immigration enforcement.

The Washington Post reported that "Trump canceled a planned trip with Nielsen this week to visit U.S. troops at the border in South Texas and told aides over the weekend he wants her out as soon as possible."

"The president has grumbled for months about what he views as Nielsen's lackluster performance on immigration enforcement and is believed to be looking for a replacement who will implement his policy ideas with more alacrity."

But does the issue of "alacrity" translate to "unconstitutional"?

Let's find out as more information becomes available.


Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

Michigan prof. disciplined for raking his anti-Semitism out on a student who wanted his recommendation

John Cheney-Lippold is a tenured professor at the University of Michigan. He refused to write a recommendation for one of his students who planned to study in Israel. This finally resulted in the racist being disciplined by the university. It's the second such incident at the school in which an anti Semitic professor refused to write a letter of recommendation for an Israeli school.

Cheney-Lippold [pronounced 'scum wafer'] recently wrote to the student in question that he would not write a letter of recommendation for her to study in Israel because to do so would violate the pro-Hamas jihad o Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement to isolate the Jewish State. This would not include, of course, items invented in Israel in agriculture, medicine and technology that have made the world a better place, but only those things that aren't required for a better life.

The school issued a statement saying it "has consistently opposed any boycott of Israeli institutions of higher education," and criticized the professor for failing to offer "support" to the student.

The letter, written by Elizabeth Cole, serving as interim dean of Michigan's College of Literature, Science and the Arts, said that Cheney-Lippold will be barred from receiving a merit-based salary increase during the current year, and will unable to take a planned sabbatical in January, or any sabbatical for two years.

He will also have to write on the blackboard: "I will not be an anti Semitic piece of dog crap" 500 times.

The letter to him stated: "Your conduct has fallen far short of the University's and College's expectations for how LSA faculty interact with and treat students," and it warned him that any similar incidents in the future can get his Hamasshole-loving butt thrown out the door [but in different words].

"In the future, a student's merit should be your primary guide for determining how and whether to provide a letter of recommendation. You are not to use student requests for recommendations as a platform to discuss your personal political [read: anti Semitic] beliefs," the letter warned.

The Washington Post reported that another teaching assistant, or graduate student instructor (GSI) [aka: POS] told a student she wouldn't write him a letter of recommendation to study at Tel Aviv University "as a way of showing solidarity with Palestine." But mostly because she hates Jews.

In this case, Jake Secker asked GSI [POS] Lucy "Allahu Akbar" Peterson for a recommendation to study in Israel. Secker's father is an Israeli and has visited Israel several times. He told Peterson that he sought to study at Tel Aviv University ["Go Bagel Noshers!"] and she wrote that she was "sorry" but that "along with numerous other academics in the US and elsewhere [who hate Jews], I have pledged myself to a boycott of Israeli institutions as a way of showing solidarity with Palestine."

She wrote this on a PC with an Intel 8088 board inside the CPU. This was invented . . . in Israel.


Click the "Follow Posts" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

Dem staffer who doxxed GOP senators WAS NOT an intern

Jackson Cosko, the Democratic staffer arrested last week for 'doxxing' Republican senators was definitely not an "intern" for Rep. Shiela Jackson Lee (D-CA) as originally reported. The 27-year-old scumquat was actually a "fellow" paid by an "outside institution" who served as a primary adviser in Lee's Congressional office.

According to the Tennessee Star, "[w]hile [Lee] claims Cosko was an 'unpaid intern' in her office, the Washington Post reports that Cosko was actually a 'fellow.' This was confirmed by Cosko's lawyer, who said his client was a "fellow" in Jackson-Lee's office and that he was being paid by an 'outside institution.'"

The identity of the "outside institution" it isn't yet known, but a "fellow" is a lot different than an "intern." According to Lee's correspondence, Cosko was routinely trusted to advise Lee and communicate with other congressional members, especially those co-sponsoring Lee's bills.

This raises questions, as the Tennessee Star elucidated: "It seems clear Cosko isn't some unlucky and overzealous intern who got caught being a naughty boy. Rather, it seems Cosko might be a Democratic operative, paid by an outside organization, planted in an unpopular congresswoman's office possibly so he could engage in exactly the type of behavior that just got him arrested."

Federal investigators arrested Cosko last week when they discovered he was the person responsible for editing a Wikipedia article that revealed their personal date: names, addresses and phone numbers of three GOP senators. This came almost immediately after Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) ended a fiery speech defending Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh [who has since been confirmed as Justice Brett Kavanaugh].

Cosko is charged with "publishing restricted personal information, threats in interstate communication, unauthorized access of a government computer, identity theft, witness tampering, second degree burglary, and unlawful entry," as Fox News reports.

Cosko may also be charged with threatening a fellow Congressional aide, to reveal names, social security numbers and health information of unnamed Senators' children. and may be charged for that as well.


Click the "Follow Posts" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

Trump has the power to cause Hurricane Florence

Hurricane Trump's Fault

According to the Washington Post, President Trump is "complicit" with Hurricane Florence. Trump and Flo are conspiring to do terrible things to the shores of the Carolinas and Virginia.

It's all due to the way President Trump thinks about climate change. If he thought that it was the most important issue facing the world today, Hurricane Florence would have never been born.

The reason for the editorial staff of the Post reasoning this way is because they're climate nazis. Although the huge storm hasn't made landfall yet [it's due to hit us on Thursday], the Wednesday headline readL: "Another hurricane is about to batter our coast. Trump is complicit."

"Our Benghazi compound is under attack. Obama and Clinton are complicit."

The birdcage liner also noted that Trump has given "good advice" on Twitter when issuing hurricane warnings before they launched their groundless attack.

"When it comes to extreme weather, Mr. Trump is complicit. He plays down humans' role in increasing the risks, and he continues to dismantle efforts to address those risks. It is hard to attribute any single weather even to climate change. But there is no reasonable doubt that humans are priming the Earth's systems to produce disasters," the feckless pseudoscientists wrote.

The science is not "settled" on climate change. Science never settles because it's always digging deeper by using something ironically known as 'the scientific method.' Saying the science is settled is as stupid as saying 'wrong side of history.' Think about it.

Yes, there appears to be a warming of the earth, but nobody knows with exactitude the degree to which humans are responsible, or what can be done do stop or slow down the warming.

Everything seems to have become political. Media, entertainment, sports and yes, even Netflix.

What ever happened to the good old days when peanut allergies didn't exist?


Follow Brain Flushings and please take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.





Tweet

Democrat Esty called to resign over violent abuse allegations against key staffer

The Democrats are putting pressure on Rep. Elizabeth Esty, trying to get her to resign because of the way she mishandled harassment and abuse claims against a key staffer. 

Esty has been under the gun since Thursday after reports in The Connecticut Post and Washington Post were levied which stated that the three-term House member allowed a chief of staff to remain on the job despite her being aware of allegations that he physically harmed and threatened to "kill" a female staff member.

Democrats hate it when their hypocrisy shows.

According to the allegations, then Chief of Staff Tony Baker on May 5, 2016, call-bombed (nearly 50 times) Anna Kain, a female staffer with whom he had a romantic relationship, and once punched the woman while in Esty's Washington office.

Ms. Kain provided a voicemail tape to The Washington Post in which Baker was reported to have said: "You better f**king reply to me or I will f**king kill you." [Fill in the blanks.]

Esty learned of the incident within a week but rather than suspending or firing Baker, she instead met with lawyers to cover her butt. She acknowledged that she didn't adequately protect Kain [by 'adequately' she meant 'did not protect Kain at all'] and has vowed to "do better." 

She said she was sorry, sort of, but added that she would not resign because she's a hypocritical feminist nightmare, as are many liberal women who pretend to care for other women while failing to advocate for women with differing political views and abused women in Middle Eastern cultures.

On Saturday, Connecticut Senate President Martin Looney along with at least six other state Democrats, called for Esty to resign. Naturally, Republicans called for the same.

To save face for his party, Looney claimed "Congresswoman Esty has long been a conscientious leader in the fight against harassment and abuse in the workplace." [Except when she wasn't.] "However . . . if the facts of this matter involving former staff of the congresswoman's office are as they are alleged to be in recent news articles, then Congresswoman Esty should do the right thing and resign."

Asking a Democrat to actually do the right thing is like the frog telling the scorpion not to sting him while riding on his back. It is the nature of Democrats to do things at the expense of others that make them feel good abut themselves.

That's how Looney got his name.

Mae Flexer, a Democratic state senator, jumped on the Esty resignation bandwagon at the very beginning.

"I was devastated to learn about the situation," Flexer told the tabloid. "The congresswoman failed her staff on every level when she decided to protect an alleged abuser instead of them. It's completely unacceptable."

Esty fired Baker in 2016 and gave him a neat $5,000 severance along with a positive job recommendation--the absolute worst thing of all that she did or didn't do.


Esty supposedly repaid the severance money and demanded counseling for Baker. 

Too little, too late. 

Esty must go.


Tweet

'Morning Joe' tricks liberal viewers with fake program

MSNBC's 'Morning Joe' hosts tried to trick their naive viewers into thinking Friday's pre-taped show was live. The host, Joe Scarborough and his current partner, Mika

Brzezinski, discussed their Thanksgiving meals, even though the holiday had not yet arrived.

Brzezinski began the show by claiming: "Day after Thanksgiving . . . I'm stuffed," as Scarborough nervously laughed. She then went on to talk about what needs to be done in Congress.

The deception is clearly disrespectful to their fellow leftists because MSNBC tried to create the lie that their overpaid morning show stars would come to work in the early morning hours after a national holiday.

The move was initially reported by The Washington Post on Wednesday.

An MSNBC spokes-liberal declined comment when Fox News tried to reach out.

In the second segment of Friday's "Morning Joe," Brzezinski joked that she forgot to remove the innards of the turkey before cooking it and that it was still a bit frozen when she served it.

"Joe didn't notice; he ate the bag," Willie Geist lied.

Scarborough giggled like an eleven-year-old girl and fired back, "It was good . . . the game last night made up for it."

MSNBC did not feature a disclaimer revealing that it was pre-taped and the only subtle difference was the disappearance of the "live" graphic that's typically present, knowing their audience isn't savvy enough to have caught it.

The scam continued even with their guest, such as Rick Tyler when he was asked about his Thanksgiving.

The Washington Post learned of the scam when a regular "Morning Joe" liberal contacted them and reportedly asked if MSNBC was airing "fake news," clearly illustrating how uninformed their normal viewing audience is. The paper was shocked to see the "Liberal Lovebirds" appearing in studio on the day after Thanksgiving.

The tipster told The Post: "I was quite flabbergasted by the way they were so deceptive about this . . . especially when they are always so quick to castigate lying [or] deception they attribute to others."

The tipster is now 'woke'.

Since the show was a pre-taped scam, they didn't mention the deadly terrorist attack at a mosque in Egypt that killed 305 people, 27 of whom were children. It was the network's news ticker that updated real time news.

An anonymous MSNBC executive spoke with The Post about the situation, but basically brushed it off because facts aren't as important as feelings to liberals.


Tweet

Roy Moore accuser has issues galore

Leigh Corfman claims that when she was 14-years-old, Roy Moore, then 32 and an assistant district attorney, made a sexual advance toward her. She said that when he mother was to appear at a courthouse regarding a custody settlement, Moore, a stranger, offered to watch Leigh while her mother went into the courthouse.

"Sure, it isn't like we're strangers--we go back, what, ninety seconds?" the mother may have said. "Sure, you can watch her. I'll just be gone a few hours."

Now after looking at who Leigh Corfman is, a few things may throw some doubt in the veracity of her claim.

Corfman has been divorced three times--that doesn't make her a liar nor does it make her a bad person. It may simply mean she makes poor choices or that she's difficult to live with, or both.

I like the 'poor choices' hypothesis. 

She has filed for bankruptcy three times, which supports the poor choice theory to a degree. 

But Corfman had also alleged that several pastors at various churches made sexual advances toward her.

Newsmax's James Hirsen tweeted Friday: 

"Purportedly Moore's main accuser Leigh Corfman has had three divorces, filed for bankruptcy three times, and has been charged with multiple misdemeanors. Posts on Moore's FB page indicate that Corfman, has claimed several pastors at various churches made sexual advances at her." -- James Hirsen (@thejimjams) November 10, 2017.

The Star reports:

She says that her teenage life became increasingly reckless with drinking, drugs, boyfriends, and a suicide attempt when she was 16.

As the years went on, Corfman says, she did not share her story about Moore partly because of the trouble in her life. She has had three divorces and financial problems. While living in Arizona, she and her second husband started a screen-printing business that fell into debt. They filed for bankruptcy protection three times, once in 1991 with $139,689 in unpaid claims brought by the Internal Revenue Service and other creditors, according to court records.

In 2005, Corfman paid a fine for driving a boat without lights. In 2010, she was working at a convenience store when she was charged with a misdemeanor for selling beer to a minor. The charge was dismissed, court records show. 

The Washington Post  originally reported the story of Corfman's claim along with a claim by another accuser, Debbie Gibson. 

Not surprisingly, the so-called newspaper failed to mention that Gibson has worked as a sign language interpreter for Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. Nor did it mention that Gibson, who goes by the name Deborah Wesson Gibson on Facebook, supports Moore's opponent, Doug Jones.

According to The Gateway Pundit, there are Facebook posts that suggest Gibson wants to see Doug Jones become Alabama's next Senator. 

On Thursday, a top Alabama political activist wrote The Gateway Pundit: "I think it's total malarkey! The opposition, McConnell included, will do anything to keep him out!"

With all those exclamation marks, it makes one wonder if the 'top Alabama activist' isn't really Donald Trump.

Doubtful!


Tweet

Washington Post urges ditching First Amendment

All colleges should censor 'racist and offensive' speech, an editorial in the Washington Post editorial read. This came in response to what they're calling a racist banana episode at the American University, which is currently under investigation by the FBI as a hate [aka 'thought'] crime. The rag is using this incident to justify getting rid of the First Amendment and stop people--racist pigs included--from saying whatever they want to say.

The editorial wants to "Make crystal clear that racist . . . speech is off limits." They want to punish and censor students if anyone thinks their speech or behavior is racist.

The term 'racist' therefore, will be determined by whoever says that what another student is saying is racist.

But worse than the ability to censor anyone you wish to shut up, the Constitution gives all of us, racists, humanitarians, good folk, bad folk and even vegetarians the right to say whatever they want. If you don't like what you hear, you can either leave or rebut the person. You do not have the right to censor that person unless they are calling for violence or creating an actual danger with their words.

And if anyone thinks that having their fragile feelings hurt is violence or danger, then they ought to shelter in place . . . forever.

It's always comical as much as it's irritating and hypocritical to hear arguments from "reputable" parakeet cage-liner newspapers to shut down free speech. In fact, my feelings are hurt by the Washington Post for them to think that I might be so racist as to even imply that people of my melanin level would promote racist dialogue or demonstrations. 

I say we censor them. 

I am not suggesting that hanging nooses on campus is not a crime--it's as offensive as hell--but I don't care for the idea that anyone should be given the power to shut down free speech.

The excuse the left gives is that hate speech isn't free speech.

Yes, hate speech is free speech, as much as it may suck to have to put up with it. But the best remedy for hate speech on campus is more speech--a better argument from the other side, not burning down a business because you're angry or getting paid by a Soros funded front to do it. 

And certainly not being stopped from speaking and stifling our core principles.

Eugene Volokh, a law professor at UCLA also wrote a Post editorial explaining why "making racist speech off limits" is a horrible idea.

"At public universities, it would violate the First Amendment; at private universities, it would violate many of the universities' stated commitments to open debate, as well as basic principles of academic freedom," Volokh wrote.

Speaking about being "crystal clear," the Supreme Court said that the government shall not discriminate based on viewpoint, even in limited public fora such as university open spaces.

Volokh also points out that even criticizing immigration could be deemed racist, or criticizing any religion. 

Who in the schools will or should decide what is or isn't racist?

The one thing that should scare all of us who appreciate the freedoms we have in this country is the notion of how one branch of government, the judiciary, is making decisions for us and unwriting much of the Constitution.

Please consider following Brain Flushings by clicking the Follow tab.


Tweet

Susan "Four Pinocchio" Rice

Susan Rice does not have a close relationship with Truth. She thinks Truth is a fickle friend who changes opinions as often as Hillary Clinton comes up with a new excuse for losing a presidential election to a TV personality. 

Just a few months ago Rice claimed Bashar al-Assad (the 'ad' is silent) regime "voluntarily and verifiably" gave up its stockpile of chemical weapons. On Monday, The Washington Post fact-checker gave Rice "four pinocchios"--the absolutely worst rating on the truth scale, or best rating on the lying scale, depending how you see the glass.

"The reality is that there were continued chemical-weapons attacks by Syria," the left-leaning tabloid wrote.

Another so-called fact-checking website, PolitiFact, also retracted its "mostly true" rating they assigned to a 2014 claim from then-Secretary of State John "Hair-plugs" Kerry that "100 percent" of those weapons were removed from Syria.

But that was back in 2014 when truth didn't matter as much in the Obama administration.

Rice's claim, on the other hand, was more recent and under a new administration where truth matters a little more, depending on who's doing the talking. She told NPR that the Obama administration was able to "find a solution" on Syria that didn't require the use of force when Obama's 'red line' was crossed--Obama dealt with it using diplomacy.

But diplomacy worked no better than Obamacare. Both were miserable failures, as was both terms of his presidency.

"We were able to get the Syrian government to voluntarily and verifiably give up its chemical weapons stockpile," Rice claimed falsely.

Unfortunately, Assad was able to scrounge up enough sarin nerve gas to kill dozens of his own people, which prompted President Trump to smack him down with 59 Cruise Tomahawk missiles at the airfield from where the gas was flown.

The Washington Post wrote "the Obama administration had a tendency to oversell what was accomplished, perhaps because Obama received so much criticism for not following through on an attack if Syria crossed what Obama had called 'a red line.'"

"The reality is that there were continued chemical-weapons attacks by Syria--and that U.S. and international officials had good evidence that Syria had not been completely forthcoming in its declaration and possibly retained sarin and VX nerve agent," the Post wrote.

In other words, Rice and Kerry lied to make Obama sound as if he had 'a pair' leading from the front.

Using Rice's words, the Post column ruled: "She did not explain that Syria's declaration was believed to be incomplete and thus was not fully verified--and that the Syrian government still attacked citizens with chemical weapons not covered by the 2013 agreement. That tipped her wordsmithing toward a Four."



Tweet

Jeh "Inshallah" Johnson gets down with ISNA

US Homeland Security Chief 'got his Islam on' at the annual Islamic Society of North America conference, (ISNA), a Muslim Brotherhood-linked organization. 

Yes, it was the "US" Homeland Security Chief, not the  Saudi, Syrian or Hamasshole one to which Johnson gave an "impassioned speech" over the weekend. The purpose of his words, as 
The Washington Post described, was to empower ISNA's participants--as if they need his words, not the Koran's to feel empowered and justified.

Jeh Johnson, who is known to his secret friends as "Inshallah Jey," told the crowd of terror fans "Your story is the quintessential American story."

No, it isn't any kind of American story.

 ISNA and the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) is the quintessential story of centuries of Islam's attempts at creating a world caliphate where the only people on earth believe that Allah is the only god and all who don't are no longer converting oxygen into carbon dioxide. 

The Muslim Brotherhood is an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror-funding trial. The Holy Land Foundation was, coincidentally (LOL) based inside the ISNA building where ISNA deposited checks into its account. Checks that were made out to the "Palestinian Mujahedeen [jihadi fighters]," the name used for the Hamasshole military wing. The money was transferred to the Holy Land Foundation.

And our very own Jeh Johnson spoke to these people. 

But "Inshallah Jeh" wasn't the only speaker at the terrorist convention. This year's speakers included Jamal Badawi, founder of another MB entity, the Muslim American Society.

Badawi openly praised Hamas and preached his support of "combative jihad." His name was personally listed in a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood directory.

Another conference speaker was Nihad Awad, the founder and executive director of the Council on Islamic American Relations (CAIR), a MB entity and another unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land terror financing case. Awad has the distinction of serving on VP Al Gore's Civil Rights Advisory Panel to the White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security, but I don't know too many Americans or Israelis who would want to fly on a plane he inspected.

To learn more about Awad, click here. But if you go to Wikipedia, you won't find out who he really is.

The Post described Johnson as the "highest-ranking U.S. official to address an ISNA conference," obviously not counting Barack Hussein Obama's 2013 address to the ISNA convention in which Obama praised the terror-linked group for its partnership with his administration. That convention had a roster of terror-linked speakers as well.

Obama doesn't just speak highly of the MB and its affiliates, he uses their input for policy formulation. That's like having a crack addict arrange the drugs in your pharmacy.

Rather than working with anti-Islamist Muslims, Obama embraces the Islamist-loving ones.

What's wrong with this picture?

Even Muslim-Americans do not choose ISNA as a group most representing their needs. In a 2011 Gallup poll, only 7% of females and 4% of males chose ISNA for that purpose. CAIR and other Islamist organizations generated similar numbers in the polls.

Obama pretends these organizations represent mainstream Muslim thought, but the good news is they don't. The good news is that Muslim-Americans are generally not looking to overthrow the American way of life, which is exactly what the MB has stated as their goal. The MB and its sister organizations want sharia governance and this goes against our Constitution and our way of life.

Islamists only work with us to use our democratic principles to implement their political goals (sharia) and this goes against our principles of free speech, freedom or religion, and all of our rights.

The Islamist ideology needs to be totally discredited and delegitimized by not allowing their high-ranking officials any voice in our government.

Perhaps once Obama is out of office this will happen, but only if Hillary Clinton does not take his place.




Tweet