Restaurant server fired after suggesting to refuse service to Trump officials

A not very bright Washington, D.C.-area restaurant server has been fired after she spoke out about possibly refusing service to incoming Trump administration officials, Fox News reported.

"I personally would refuse to serve any person in office who I know of as being a sex trafficker or trying to deport millions of people," Suzannah Van Rooy, a leftist server at Beuchert's Saloon on Capitol Hill, told the Washingtonian this week. "It’s not, ‘Oh, we hate Republicans.’ It’s that this person has moral convictions that are strongly opposed to mine, and I don’t feel comfortable serving them."

Apparently Suzannah thinks that she is virtuous and her convictions are the correct ones. Obviously, she is a virtue-signaling dolt.

Her remarks were part of an article discussing potential "resistance" from locals towards certain Trump administration members in public spaces following high-profile incidents during Trump's first term, like when then-aide Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked to leave a restaurant in Lexington, Va., and protesters confronted then-Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen at a Mexican restaurant in D.C.

"People were a lot more motivated the first time around to do those kinds of shows of passion. This time around, there is kind of a sense of defeat and acceptance," Van Rooy said, according to the Washingtonian. "But I hope that people still do stand up to this administration and tell them their thoughts on their misbehavior."

According to a review of her LinkedIn profile on Friday, before it was taken down, Van Rooy listed her responsibilities as managing daily operations, crafting messaging strategies, building relationships with influencers, and organizing in-house events for political figures and VIPs. Her profile also noted her role as an organizer for Texas Democrat Beto O'Rourke's unsuccessful gubernatorial campaign in 2022.

Beuchert's Saloon informed Fox News Digital that Van Rooy's statements were "reprehensible" and led to her dismissal for breaching their "zero-tolerance policy on discrimination." They clarified that she was a part-time server, not a manager. After learning of her comments on Thursday, the restaurant issued statements on social media, denouncing her remarks:

"Recent comments made by a member of staff who had no authority to speak on behalf of our entire restaurant have been, quite rightly, flagged as inappropriate, hostile, intolerant, and unacceptable. This staff member does NOT speak for us as a restaurant."

Following the inauguration in January, they emphasized their commitment to serving all community members: "We have always been a safe space for all. Everyone, especially anyone who feels prejudged or misunderstood, will always find friendly service and a sympathetic ear at Beuchert’s Saloon. Again, we deeply apologize for the comments made by a member of staff. They are NOT representative of our restaurant and do not reflect how we operate as a business, and how proud we are to be a gathering place on Capitol Hill."

By Friday, the restaurant announced her termination, citing her comments and unauthorized use of their social media accounts as the reasons:

"Not only do Ms. Van Rooy’s comments clearly violate our zero-tolerance policy on discrimination, but her decision to sign into our social media accounts in the middle of the night to post her own rhetoric in wildly offensive responses to comments is a further breach of conduct and protocol. She has no authority to speak on our behalf, and her comments do not reflect the positions of over twenty other people who make up our staff."

"For these reasons as well as the sheer dismay and disgust we feel at her unforgivable behavior, Ms. Van Rooy has been dismissed immediately. Our staff and families (many of whom are personally offended by Ms. Van Rooy’s comments about them) are still reeling from what Ms. Van Rooy said and did, and we as a restaurant are simply horrified to be associated with base prejudice."

They concluded by distancing the restaurant from her actions, encouraging continued patronage:

"We are still the same restaurant known for its warm service and friendly staff, and hope you will all visit us soon. We look forward to serving you. All of you."

Tweet

Pelosi rejects border-security facts with her delusions

House Speaker Nancy "Hyper Hands" Pelosi got into a verbal kerfuffle with Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.

Pelosi kept interrupting Nielsen's presentation on border security and illegal immigration, saying "I reject your facts." Ironically, the facts don't belong to anyone--they simply exist--and Pelosi's facts only exist in her mind. Meanwhile, President Trump is not budging on his demand for funding a border wall.

At one point during Nielsen's presentation, according to the Wall Street Journal, Pelosi interrupted her as she was citing statistics related to the border, including how many criminal illegal immigrants attempted to enter the U.S. last year.

“I reject your facts,” Pelosi told Nielsen.

“These aren’t my facts," Nielsen shot back. "These are the facts.” But Pelosi's feelings were hurt and that's all that matters to liberals.

Following the episode, Nielsen went to social media to criticize Pelosi and the Democrats for not wanting to hear about the issue of illegal immigration. She tweeted:

“I am disappointed that Dems did not want to hear from @DHSgov about the security & humanitarian crisis we are facing at the border. They didn’t want to hear about criminal aliens, drug smugglers, smuggled & abused children or violent caravans trying to breach the border wall.”

“The crisis is not going away-it is getting worse. The status quo in funding & authorities for #DHS is irresponsible & makes our country less secure. Kicking the can down the road is not the answer. I look forward to engaging w Members who want to.”

It isn't about border security, Kirstjen--it's all about politics, nothing more. To give Trump a victory on a campaign promise, in spite of the good it does for the country and that the voters elected him on that promise, does not matter to Democrats.

Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the second-ranking Senate Democrat, also criticized Nielsen’s presentation, telling Bloomberg that it “was not a credible presentation.”

“It was preposterous,” Durbin said. “At a time when we have the lowest level of apprehensions at the border — stopping people from coming in illegally — the lowest level historically, she is saying that we have all these terrorists and criminals and all these people on their way in.”

The lowest level of apprehension is due to the fact that under the Obama administration, whenever an illegal alien was immediately turned back, they counted it as an apprehension. The Trump administration is being honest about the situation--what a novel idea.

Nielsen reportedly told the Democrats at the meeting that border officials along the U.S.-Mexico border had apprehended about 3,000 people with terrorist ties and 17,000 criminals last year. Whether that number is accurate is less important than the fact that terrorists are among the migrants, and the fact that we have a constitutional obligation to preserve the sanctity of our nation.

However, to be clear, the number may very well be accurate.



"Hyper Hands" also asked the DHS head whether she was counting anyone crossing the border illegally as having a criminal record, with the administration denying that’s how the figure was devised.

Wednesday’s meeting didn’t resolve the government shutdown as both sides continue to stick to their principles and refuse to concede.

On Friday, following another contentious meeting in the White House with congressional leaders, Trump warned that the partial government shutdown could last “years” and saying he could even declare a “national emergency” to bypass Congress if necessary to build the wall.

What he also needs to do, is make it clear that the government shutdown would end if the Democrats would simply fund the wall like they advocated in the past. What has changed[?] he needs to ask.

“We can call a national emergency [to build a border wall] because of the security of our country,” Trump told reporters in the Rose Garden, during a lengthy and impromptu press conference on Friday.

“I may do it,” he said, before adding, “If we can do it through a negotiated process, we’re giving it a shot.”


Well here we are in the beginning of a new year and the world still hasn't come to an end with President Trump in the White House, in spite of what the media and the left [but I repeat myself] would have you believe.

I hope that you will follow Brain Flushings throughout the year and feel free to comment on any issues of concern. Please subscribe and check out the sponsors on these pages too.

Tweet

Parents of 8-year-old migrant boy who died tell why they brought him

The mother of the 8-year-old Guatemalan boy, Felipe Gomez Alonzo, who died after crossing into the U.S. told her family's reasons for bringing him on the dangerous journey.

The mother, Catarina Alonzo, was interviewed by Reuters,  and admitted that her husband took her son with him to the border in the hopes that the child would afford them easier entry into the United States.

Instead, 8-year-old Felipe Gomez Alonzo became ill and died. Every Democrat on Capitol Hill secretly smiled inside because now they could lay the blame of the child's death on President Trump rather than on the real culprits.

“Lots of them have gone with children and managed to cross, even if they’re held for a month or two. But they always manage to get across easily,” Alonzo told Reuters through sobs.

Alonzo said that her husband, an agricultural worker, wanted to get to the U.S. to find better work to pay off his debts. He also hoped that he could enroll Felipe in a higher quality school. But mostly for a better job.

Felipe fell ill in U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) custody on Monday, [all due to President Trump and his unwillingness to allow illegal aliens entry into the United States]. 

The child  was taken to a hospital where he was diagnosed with a common cold and a fever. The child was given prescriptions for Amoxicillin and Ibuprofen, but later began vomiting.

According to the Department of Homeland Security, Felipe’s father was offered further medical treatment for his son but he declined, a bad call on his part, but still all Trump's fault.

During a later welfare check, agents noticed the boy was not doing well and took him to the hospital, where he passed away just before midnight.

Felipe is the second child to die in CBP custody this month at the hands of President Trump. A girl, 7-year-old Jakelin Caal, also from Guatemala, passed away after falling ill during a bus ride to the nearest U.S. port of entry.

The children’s deaths have increased scrutiny of the conditions in migrant shelters and led CBP to conduct welfare checks on every single child in their custody. DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen is also personally taking a trip to the border to review her agency’s tactics in detaining migrants. Nancy Pelosi is moving her hands hither and thither quickly in a frenetic effort to do something. Meanwhile, Chuck Schumer is flaring his nostrils and calling for Maxine Waters to impeach Trump.

Jim Carrey is tweeting like there's no tomorrow.

However, the Trump administration has denied responsibility for the migrant deaths and is urging parents not to bring children with them on the long journeys to the border from Central America.

Just let them try and prove it wasn't the fault of the Trump administration. Just let them try.

“Does the administration take responsibility for a parent taking a child on a trek through Mexico to get to this country?” White House spokesperson Hogan Gidley told reporters earlier this month.

Nancy Pelosi said they should, especially Donald Trump, whose fault it is with or without evidence, like in the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings.

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do.



Tweet

Rep. Gutierrez says Trump's border policies would have killed Jesus

Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D-IL) histrionically shouted that the Trump administration's immigration policy would have killed the sweet baby Jesus of Nazareth, Son of G-d. Unfortunately for the repulsive Rep., he knows little about Christ and probably doesn't give a fiddler's flatulence about Christianity unless he can politicize Him.

First of all, the border policies are not Trump's policies, they are the policies of the U.S. government and all Trump is doing is following the law as he swore to do when he held up his right hand to the Bible. Does Gutiérrez even own a Bible?

He attacked the Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen because he is fairly certain he could beat her in a fistfight. The misogynist used all his time at the House Judiciary Committee hearing to attack Nielsen as a "remorseless" liar for her repeated claims that the DHS does not have a family separation policy.

“It is repugnant to me and astonishing to me that during Christmas, a time in which we celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ — a Jesus Christ who had to flee for his life with Mary and Joseph,” Gutiérrez said. “Thank God there wasn’t a wall that stopped him from seeking refuge in Egypt.

What a schmuck.

He bloviated on about thanking G_d that there was no wall at the time of Jesus and spoke about  the journey Christ had to endure, much like the journeys of those Christ-like migrants whose spark of divinity excuses them from following the law--a law that existed long before Trump came into office.

“Shame on everybody that separates children and allows them to stay at the other side of the border fearing death, fearing hunger, fearing sickness. Shame on us for wearing our badge of Christianity during Christmas and allow the secretary to come here and lie.”

Shame on that moron for staying silent when Obama was doing exactly the same thing and worse, they put kids in cages and pretended it was the Trump administration that did it.

Ms. Nielsen said Mr. Gutiérrez’s efforts to paint her as a liar are “fighting words.”

“I’m not a liar,” Ms. Nielsen replied. “We’ve never had a policy for family separation. I’m happy to walk the gentleman through it again. A policy of family separation would mean that any family that I encountered in the interior, I would separate. It would mean that any family that I found at port of entry, I would separate. It would mean every single family that I found illegally crossing, we would separate. We did none of those. What we did do is uphold the laws that Congress has passed and we prosecuted those who choose to come here illegally.”

She then noted that Mr. Gutierrez had slithered out of the room, perhaps because he's a cowardly scumcrumpet virtue-signaling wuss.

“He couldn’t be bothered to stay,” she said. “So I’m happy to tell the rest of the committee.”

“I take personal offense on behalf of the 240,000 men and women of the Department of Homeland Security,” she added.

If it were up to the Democrats, there would be no wall, no border and nothing to stop the flow of future Democrats into the country. If illegal migration directly affected Democrats, this would be a non-issue.

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do. 

I hope you have a wonderful Christmas.

Tweet

7-year-old migrant dies after illegal border crossing

A 7-year-old girl, whose parents took her along on the dangerous journey to attempt entering the United States illegally, has died after being caught jumping the border. It's believed the cause of death was due to the elements the parents exposed her to on the arduous journey.

Somehow, it feels as if the media is going to blame President Trump for the child's death, not the parents who exposed her to the rough trek.

The child was found December 6 by Border Patrol agents and was part of a larger group of illegal migrants from Central America who had just crossed into the U.S. She was in Border Patrol custody for eight hours, and agents observed that she was having seizures and had a fever of 105.7 degrees.

She was flown by air ambulance to a hospital in El Paso, had a heart attack, was revived but did not recover and died within a day, Homeland Security stated.

Homeland Security said, in a statement, that the girl was “overcome by the elements” of the journey, and said the blame lies with the adults who made her take the trip, which is absolutely true.

“As we have always said, traveling north illegally is extremely dangerous. Drug cartels, human smugglers and the elements pose deadly risks to anyone who comes across the border illegally,” the department said, without mentioning the fact that a very large percentage of young women are sexually violated along the journey.

Traveling with a child is key to the illegal border crossing plans due to a 2015 court ruling whereby families are put into a more lenient track for enforcement and are released from custody usually within 20 days. There’s been a rise in the number of men attempting to come to the border with children, which experts attribute to that fact.

Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said the group of illegal migrants the girl was with was caught 90 miles away from a processing center and had to be transported. Due to the number of people in the group, it took substantial time to process all of them and to spot the child's condition, which explains the eight hours she was in custody.

“We gave immediate care,” when her condition was spotted, Kirstjen told Fox News Friday morning.

Officials said an autopsy is expected but may take weeks to get results, and they said an internal investigation will determine if the agents followed the right procedures.

The right procedure in this case would also be charging the parents with endangering the welfare of a child, but that isn't going to happen. Rather, the media will find a way to make this a political issue and point fingers at the Trump administration.

I can't wait to learn what Joy[less] Behar will say about it on "The View."

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do. 

I hope you have a wonderful Christmas.

Tweet

Ocasio-Cortez compares migrant caravan to Jews fleeing Nazi Germany

Alexandria Virginia  Overrated-Cortex, the new brain trust of the Democratic Party and congresswoman-elect, is not only the youngest person to be elected to Congress, she is also the dumbest.

Seriously.

The Bronx native compared migrants in the caravan [who clashed with law enforcement on the US-Mexico border] to Jewish folks fleeing Nazi Germany and other targets of genocide. The biggest difference between them is that the Jews didn't carry Nazi flags like the Central Americans who proudly waved flags of the homeland from where they were "escaping "

Another big difference is that the migrants weren't targeted for mass extermination by their governments based on their religion. But that doesn't matter, it's coming from a leftist politician where facts are inconvenient truths.

Overrated-Cortex has been elected by quite a large number of very low-information New Yorkers for the 14th Congressional District. In spite of her new job as a lawmaker, she tweeted over the weekend in support of the lawbreakers who are trying to cross the US-Mexico border illegally. And she actually compared them to those who escaped Nazi Germany, Rwanda and Syria.

She tweeted on Sunday:

"Asking to be considered a refugee& applying for status isn't a crime. It wasn't for Jewish families fleeing Germany. It wasn't for targeted families fleeing Rwanda. It wasn't for communities fleeing war-torn Syria. And it isn't for those fleeing violence in Central America,"

But the migrants are not coming to the border applying for status. They are bum-rushing the border and are trying to gain entry without going through the proper procedure. But worse, they as refugees are supposed to seek asylum in the first country they arrive at--Mexico, in this case--not go nation shopping.

Also, Mexico has an obligation to accept and make a judgment about the migrants' claims to asylum because they, like the U.S. and EU, are a signatory to the U.N. Convention whereby refugees must seek safe haven in the first country they come to.

Consider the fact that San Diego ports of entry are on the far west coast of the continent whereas Honduras sits considerably to the east and south. The journey the migrants made was unnecessarily longer than it should have been and there was plenty of opportunities for the hordes of migrants to seek asylum in Mexico, yet they chose not to, which is quite notable.

Still, over the weekend, hundreds of migrants from the Central American caravan rushed the border at the port of entry in San Ysidro, California causing the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents (CBP) to protect themselves from the rock-throwing that went under reported by the mainstream media by using several shots of tear gas.

This was the same method used by the Obama administration when they had similar problems, but this too went under the media's radar.

 CBP said some demonstrators “attempted to illegally enter the U.S. through both the northbound and southbound vehicle lanes at the port of entry itself. Those persons were stopped and turned back to Mexico.”

Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said in a statement that some migrants "attempted to breach legacy fence infrastructure along the border and sought to harm CBP personnel by throwing projectiles at them."

She continued: "As I have continually stated, DHS will not tolerate this type of lawlessness and will not hesitate to shut down ports of entry for security and public safety reasons. We will also seek to prosecute to the fullest extent of the law anyone who destroys federal property, endangers our frontline operators, or violates our nation’s sovereignty."

As of Monday morning, about 50 migrants had been detained after illegally crossing the border. 

In Mexico, Tijuana’s municipal government announced it arrested more than three-dozen migrants for disturbing the peace and other charges related to the crossing attempt.

These are nothing like the Jews fleeing the Nazis, Alexandria. Nor are they like families fleeing Rwanda or Syria. 

Get your head out of your nether regions.


Hello fellow conservatives. Please click the "Follow" button in the margin to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

First lady's office seeks firing of deputy security adviser

The office of first lady Melania Trump said on Tuesday that Mira Ricardel, the deputy national security adviser, a position just below that of John Bolton, should be given her walking papers. This is a rather bold move coming after President Trump is contemplating further firings of his Cabinet after the attorney general Jeff Sessions was forced to resign.

Stephanie Grisham, Melania's communication director and not related to writer John Grisham as far as we can tell, said in a statement, "It is the position of the Office of the First Lady that [Ricardel] no longer deserves the honor of serving in this White House."

Why?

Because it is alleged by the Wall Street Journal that Ricardel and Melania Trump's staff had a dispute over seating arrangement on a plane during the first lady's trip to Africa last month. The Journal also added that Grisham's office suspects Ricardel of leaking negative stories about Mrs. Trump and her staff.

"If so, she should be waterboarded and fired thereafter," an anonymous source told CNN's Jim Acosta.

It was further reported that Ricardel fought with Defense Secretary Mad Dog Mattis over policy differences, staffing decisions, and the best way to kill someone to neutralize the threat.

Ricardel assumed the deputy national security adviser in May, one month after POTUS appointed John Bolton as national security adviser to replace Henry McMaster.

The angst over Ricardel comes at a time Trump is considering changes to his Cabinet that might include the firings of White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, and first lady Melania Trump, although that's somewhat doubtful at this time.

WJS reported Tuesday that Trump is "resigned" to the possibility of a Kelly canning if Nielsen is made to resign.

Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

Will DHS secretary Nielsen get the ax?

It has been reported that President Trump has made the decision to fire Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen within the next several weeks due to his frustration with her "performance" on immigration enforcement.

The Washington Post reported that "Trump canceled a planned trip with Nielsen this week to visit U.S. troops at the border in South Texas and told aides over the weekend he wants her out as soon as possible."

"The president has grumbled for months about what he views as Nielsen's lackluster performance on immigration enforcement and is believed to be looking for a replacement who will implement his policy ideas with more alacrity."

But does the issue of "alacrity" translate to "unconstitutional"?

Let's find out as more information becomes available.


Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

DHS to waive environmental laws in order to build the wall

Houston -- The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will waive environmental laws in order to build gates between sections of border barriers in South Texas' Rio Grande Valley, the Associated Press reported.

There are 11 locations the waiver will cover where the government plans to install gates in existing fencing. Similar waivers have been issued by DHS in recent months, similar to this latest group, for projects along the southwest border.

There already is about 700 miles of fencing along the southwest border. In parts of South Texas, segments of fencing begin and end along the levee built next to the Rio Grande, the river separating the U.S. and Mexico. Much of the fencing are a distance from the river and in some instances cut off private property.

This latest proposal of the gates would solve that problem by sealing off some of the gaps.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection usually grant residents who are cut off, access to the gates so they can get to the other side of their land.

It's beginning to look like the wall is being built, and the government also separately plans to start building new barriers for fulfill President Trump's signature campaign promise to build a border wall. Congress has approved $1.6 billion in wall spending, which included funding for 33 miles of construction in the Rio Grande Valley.

Some of the construction planning cuts through the National Butterfly Center and other environmentally sensitive areas. Liberal butterfly enthusiasts are livid and butterflies are confused, not knowing where to go nor how to get there. Most plan to fly.

The valley is the busiest corridor for illegal border crossings, and U.S. government officials say it's targeted by human and drug traffickers.

DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wrote that there's "an acute and immediate need to construct physical barriers and roads" along the border. She waived regulations under the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act, and about two dozen other laws, because she rather see butterflies die, than humans die at the hands of terrorists or other illegal aliens.


Click the "Follow Posts" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.

Tweet

Waters uses 'make water' excuse to ditch reporters

Crazy Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) yelled at reporters after she was questioned about her call to harass Trump supporters in public.

Evidently the shoe was on the other foot and she didn't like it.

"Now get out of here! I'm going to the women's room," Waters yelled to the group of reporters outside the Speaker's Lobby.

Prior to her walking into the bathroom for what appeared to be a much needed wiz, she was asked whether her remarks are bad for the Democrats. Of course, she again refused to answer as she jumped up and down in place, clearly in need of relief.

Waters, whose name is as ironic as her intolerance for her own tactics being used on her, faced bipartisan criticism to a crowd of fellow idiots in Los Angeles. After Sarah Sanders and Kirstjen Nielsen were pressured into leaving restaurants last week over the issue of family separation at the border during the Trump administration, Waters urged the crowd to continue the harassment.

"If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere," the instigator said.

But she couldn't handle a simple line of questioning about her call to harass those with whom she disagrees.

President Trump has used Waters' lunacy by describing her [and Nancy Pelosi] as the face of the Democrats and he accused her of advocating "harm," which is totally reasonable.

"The face of the Democrats is now Maxine Waters who, together with Nancy Pelosi, have established a fine leadership team," he tweeted. "They should always stay together and lead the Democrats, who want Open Borders and Unlimited Crime, well into the future...and pick Crooked Hillary for Pres."

Waters accused Trump of lying about what she said, but it's on the record.

Even Chuck "Nostrils" Schumer has criticized Waters on the Senate floor: "No one should call for the harassment of political opponents. That's not right. That's not American.

Schumer knows that Waters' stupid comments are only helping the GOP and he's trying to put an end to it.

But all Waters says in reply is: "Ssssssssssssssssssssssssssss."


Tweet

Dems worry that they've gone too far

"Look Aunty Maxine--a dead bird"

Some Democrats are worried about the Nazi tactics those in their party are employing [read the history on those tactics if you don't believe it] in spite of their claim that it's the GOP who are the Nazis. These worried liberals are afraid that they will have their collective butts handed to them in the midterm elections in November.

Specifically, Trump officials have been publicly harassed and shamed by the left using the same Josef Goebbels tactics the Nazis used against the Jews in Germany before and during the Second World War.

For example, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen was verbally attacked at a Mexican restaurant and White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders [and her family] was asked to leave the Red Hen restaurant in Lexington, Virginia by the owner.

On Monday night, demonstrators gathered at the home of Stephen Miller, a Trump adviser, but they didn't realize he wasn't home.

The left-leaning Washington Post wrote an editorial titled, "Let the Trump team eat in peace." They called the Nazi tactics their fellow leftists are using a heightened state of "passions" and saw no benefit in the interrupting of dinners.

In fact, they're probably worried that it will actually serve the Republican Party come November and create sympathy for the Trump administration.

Possibly the dumbest person on the far left, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), called for her fellow fascists to confront members of the Trump administration wherever and whenever they are seen in public--gas stations, restaurants, etc.

"If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant," Waters shouted Saturday to a crowd of cretins, "in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere.

Later that day on MSNBC she said that protesters are "going to absolutely harass them."

Waters' call for potential violence was in response to President Trump's "zero-tolerance" immigration policy in which the law is being followed to the letter.

As predicted, she later claimed her comments have been misunderstood. She wasn't calling for protesters to literally "harm" Cabinet members--just get all worked up and scream at them.

"Trump is the one who is creating lies," Waters said at a Monday news conference. "Trying to have people believe that I talked about harming people. There's nowhere in my statement, anytime, anyplace that we talked about harm."

 If she believes that harassment under intense emotions would not eventually lead to physical violence, she is merely proving her lack of intelligence.

Trump would love to make Waters the Democratic Party's spokesperson. He tweeted on Monday:

"Congresswoman Maxine Waters, an extraordinarily low IQ person, has become, together with Nancy Pelosi, the Face of the Democrat Party. She has just called for harm to supporters, of which there are many, of the Make America Great Again movement. Be careful what you wish for Max!"

Even David Axelrod tried to urge calm suggesting people organize, donate [of course], volunteer and vote. He said "ultimately, counter-productive gestures . . . won't change a thing."

It looks like the Democratic Party is going crazy with Trump Derangement Syndrome. They see his policies are working and have no platform to stand on so they have to resort to classless, adolescent behavior.


Tweet

Maxine Waters calls for violence against Trump team

Rep[ulsive] Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) called for her mob on the left to go after everyone in the Trump administration for having a different opinion than hers.

"I have no sympathy for these people that are in this administration who, you know, know it is wrong what they are doing on so many fronts but they tend to not want to confront this president or even leave," Waters, who is a hundred air miles short of takeoff said on MSNBC Saturday.

She called on leftists to deny people [who believe the border laws should be followed in the same manner that all laws are to be] their right to go out in public without being harassed. That's the bottom line.

"And I want to tell you, for these members of his [Trump's] cabinet who remain and try to defend him, they are not going to be able to go to a restaurant, they are not going to be able to stop at a gas station, they are not going to be able to shop in a department store," the lunatic on the left continued. "The people are going to turn on them, they are gonna protest, they are gonna absolutely harass them until they decide that they are going to tell the president 'No, I can't hang with you. This is wrong. This is unconscionable. We can't keep doing this to children.'"

Waters was referring to the law that separates children from their parents who illegally bring them over the border and must remove them from their parents' who are placed in detention within 20 days. This was a law that originated in the Bill Clinton administration and carried through the Obama administration.

Waters is calling for those who uphold the law to be harassed. Does she think that harassment will stop with mere words? Or does she realize that this is a possible call for violence?

How is this woman allowed to remain a public servant when she refuses to abide by the laws designed to protect the public?

White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders was asked to leave a Red Hen restaurant in Lexington, Virginia last week. Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen was screamed at in a Washington D.C. restaurant by protesters.

And Maxine Waters, who was charged with three ethics violations in 2010, supports the anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan, and is calling for people to harass those in the current administration. 

And she has the gall to call the administration unethical and wants Trump impeached on grounds she has yet to explain.

She is calling for fascistic political violence and needs to be investigated on those grounds or this is not going to end well.



Tweet

Omarosa grounded from White House

Omarosa Manigault has been put on Santa Kelly's 'Naughty List' and now has limited access to former "Apprentice" star and current President of the United States, Donald Trump.

White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, a former U.S. Marine Corps general, is trying to bring discipline to an apparent chaotic West Wing. He put Omarosa on a "no-fly list" that he keeps on White House aides he sees as unfit to attend serious meetings, The New York Times reported.

Her name is the most prominent on the list, which describes her as a former "Apprentice" star with an ill-defined job in the White House. 

Can you imagine, John Kelly has the gall to limit the number of people attending Trump's meetings just because their jobs don't require they attend.

According to the Gray Lady, Omarosa's habit of stepping into meetings to which she wasn't invited is what got her on the no-fly list, and the person who then must enforce the ban is Kirstjen Nielsen.

Nielsen's appointment was announced at a staff meeting Wednesday as part of Kelly's effort to enhance a more disciplined environment and perhaps put a finger in the proverbial dyke, to stop the leaks that have been flowing out.

But The Times said Kelly's new move has angered people who already hate him and now they may be plotting and complaining to the press.

It sounds as if they need a safe space . . . poor dears.



Tweet