Susan Rice: "It's onnaconna I'm a black woman"

Poor little Miss Susie Rice, the Obama national security adviser. She is being scrutinized over her alleged involvement in the "unmasking" of Trump associates during the 2016 presidential election in which Donald Trump destroyed Hillary Clinton and made millions of fluffer-nutters cry uncontrollably to the delight of millions.

Rice is suggesting in a recent interview that her race and gender might be playing a role in the close scrutiny she's facing.

In other words, she's pulling both the race card and gender card out of her fat wallet and crying "You're not being fair to me, a poor, defenseless black woman who means no harm."

"Why me? Why not Jay Carney, for example, who was then our press secretary who stood up more?" she said as the proverbial bus came speeding by with Carney's body under it.

Maybe she has a point and perhaps Carney too should be investigated. By why not her? The gender card is really an indication that the person pulling it actually doesn't see men and women as equal.

Rice, you may recall, went on the Sunday talk shows knowing she was lying when she said the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack was caused by a video.

I could go on, but too much Rice can make you sick, unless it's Condoleezza.



Tweet

Fifteen Questions for Obama and his Cronies

So many questions, so many scandals, so few answers. All we seem to get are lies or statements of ignorance. "I just learned about it the way you guys did--I saw it in the media." Yeah, sure.

Well here are some questions I dare them to answer.

1. How did the Obama administration get the information about Bergdahl's medical condition? If it was from that video, that was 6 months ago. When Bowe (pronounced Ahmad) got out of the truck and walked toward the Black Hawk helicopter, he didn't look to be in physical distress. I'm not a physician, but I suspect Obama et al were distancing themselves from the truth--in other words, they were lying.

Benghazi and the House Select Committee: they're shaking in their boots

The House Select Committee investigating Benghazi will be led by Trey Gowdy (R-SC).  Gowdy says that he has witnesses who are willing to come forward and testify about a cover-up. 

The military, After Action Report will be subpoenaed along with the power to obtain un-redacted emails. The Presidential Daily Briefings will also be requested, and Gowdy is clear that he wants to see all relevant material and he will judge the relevancy with his own eyes.

There is no known date as to when the findings will be completed but a resolution date will be named soon.

While Adam Schiff (D-CA) wants to boycott the committee hearing, I believe he, like the Democratic party, is part of the problem. What happened in Benghazi transcends politics. Some in the GOP seem to understand that. But the liberals want to continue to protect this administration and to do so, it is at the expense of the nation.

House Majority Leader, Eric Cantor (R-VA) spoke on Greta Susteren's On the Record and says that he is optimistic about the outcome of the investigation, although he cannot predict how long it will last.

John McCain (R-AZ) is adamant about  wanting to know president Obama's whereabouts the night of September 11, 2012. He also believes that Jay Carney has destroyed his reputation as a journalist with his misrepresentation of the facts around Benghazi. 

The one thing I know is true, the military doesn't wait to see if things are safe before attempting to rescue fellow Americans in harm's way. They move toward the sounds of gunfire. And nobody knew how long the assault was going to last, so there is no excuse to stand down. Leon Panetta is a fool if he believes anyone who ever wore a military uniform takes that seriously.

But knowing the attackers used mortars and heavy weapons proves they were not attacking spontaneously, was so obvious that even Obama forgot about what he said back in 2012, when he spoke about Russia and Ukraine. He agreed that an attack with such weaponry could not have come from a spontaneous attack.

The problem with lying is, you need a good memory. And I remember what Hillary said.

A New York reporter, is captured by Islamist terrorists who demand the release of three Gitmo prisoners in exchange for him. If the president refuses their demands, they plan to behead the reporter and videotape it for the Internet. But the United States doesn’t give in to terrorist’s demands and he has 24 hours before he is to be executed. 

The clock is ticking . . .                                         

Jihad Joe Soft Cover

click here for ebook version  

My other blog New York Canuck

Tweet

Dude, Two Years Not Too Late

Former White House Spokesliar, Tommy Vietor was interviewed by Fox News' Brett Baier a few nights ago. The interview was on the Benghazi talking points and young Tommy denied that he remembered the role he played in the now famous (and some call "smoking gun") e-mail that was sent to Susan Rice to "PREP" her for the Sunday morning talk shows that she was to appear on.

"Dude, that was like two years ago," the former chewing gum aficionado told Baier.

"Dude, it's the thing that everybody's talking about," Baier shot back. Tommy looked as uncomfortable as a bomb-defuser with the DTs. 

Tommy said that he was in the Situation Room during the attack but Obama was not there. Vietor said: "It is well known that when the attack was first briefed to him, it was in the Oval Office and he was updated constantly." But when pressed for Obama's physical location in the White House, Tommy said that he didn't know Obama's whereabouts in the night because he didn't have a "tracking device" on him.

It's easy to see the arrogance in Tommy Vietor--it's recognizable in many of those who speak for Obama. Jay Carney acts as though you're stupid for not believing him, and Marie Harf is no different. Clearly, the Obama administration treats the American public as if we are stupid, but it is only the Obama robots who actually are.

Here is the tweet that Tommy Vietor sent out before appearing on Fox: 

Tommy Vietor @TVietor08

Follow

Guessing @BretBaier invited me to come on @SpecialReport to talk #Benghazi as a #TBT thing since it happened in 2012 but tune in!

5:15 PM - 1 May 2014

#TBT is for "Throwback Thursday." How utterly juvenile and arrogant.

Tweet

A Dozen Questions by a Conservative

1. If Starbucks can refuse service to gun owners, why can't a photographer refuse service to people they don't want to serve? What about bakery owners? Starbucks is anti-gun and believes that they have the right to refuse people service, even the police who may be carrying guns and simply want a cup of bitter coffee. 

On the other hand, a Catholic parade, Saint Patrick's, lost the sponsorship of Diageo, the parent company of Guinness and Heineken, and Sam Adams Beer, in New York City and Boston, respectively. The parade organizers refused to make the parade an endorsement for gays advertising their sexuality and the beer companies rescinded their sponsorship. Gay banners announcing sexual orientation have nothing to do with the parade.

2. Why do people who attack God, symbols of religion, and Christianity more specifically, fail to attack Islam, and even defend it in some cases? I suspect the answer is simple: our Judeo-Christian practices are peaceful and make for easy targets. Islam, on the other hand, is not so peaceful, especially when even mildly criticized. But maybe I'm misguided. What do you think?

3. How has president Obama's policies made America stronger, safer, and respected by the world community?

4. Why is there no outcry from women's organizations like NOW, against the treatment of women in Islamic countries?

5. Why hasn't gay or lesbian groups like GLAAD spoken out against the treatment of gays in Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and other Muslim nations? They complain like hell when we refuse them the chance to march in our straight parades, but maybe if we did the same thing they do in Iran, hang them from public scaffolding for their crime against Allah, they'd sing a different tune. Maybe a show tune.

6. Why do liberals say the discussion is over about climate change? And why did they change the term to "global warming?" All of the facts are not in, and much of what we know is only theory.

7. Why hasn't congress done anything of substance to Hillary, Holder, and Lerner?

8. Why isn't there a real outcry, a livid response, about the fact that a number of people of the Muslim Brotherhood have visited our White House and met with Obama and nothing was revealed about the substance?

9. Why don't conservatives boycott companies that espouse anti-American and/or anti-Constitutional sentiments?

10.Why do we allow politicians to skirt around the issues and refuse to answer questions?

11. Why do liberals think that blacks should only vote the way they would like blacks to vote? Do they believe that blacks should not have free will?

12. Has Jay Carney ever told the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? What about his boss?



Tweet

Lying Liars

It's estimated that over 136,000 people have died since the Syrian revolution began in 2011. Assad still hasn't turned over his stash of chemical weapons and when Jay Carney was confronted about this by Ed Henry of Fox News, Carney admitted that Assad has certainly "blown some deadlines."

So, while Assad has blown some deadlines, we have Jay Carney blowing some smoke in places where smoke should not be blown. 

Can you recall the last time Carney has actually answered a question directly, factually, and honestly? I honestly cannot. The same goes for Obama and his entire administration.

Benghazi: the truth exposed

Benghazi. Four dead Americans: Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, information officer, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, both former SEALs.  Jay Carney told us last year that it "happened so long ago," as if the Obama administration earned immunity over time. 

Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton, Obama, and Carney said that a crummy video on the life of Mohammed caused the attack. Recent testimony shows that they all lied to the American people. They scammed us and even Diane Feinstein (D-CA) is saying that the New York Times is wrong to recently reclaim that the attack was sparked by an anti-Islamic video. From what we've learned thus far, it seems that Feinstein knew about who was responsible for the attack as she received information within minutes of the assault. The question now remains, why didn't Feinstein tell the American public the truth when she knew it?

We demanded answers. We had our Benghazi banners on our Twitter avatars. We didn't stop speaking about the attack. We blogged, we spoke to friends, we didn't let up. The one thing most of us can agree on is that  the latest testimony and findings, should give us all the reason we need to distrust the Times forever more.

Eric Holder's Department of Justice, however, seems quicker to pursue baseball scandals before pursuing those such as Benghazi.  

I miss the America that existed when I was growing up in New York City. We pledged allegiance to the flag, teachers could discipline us without losing their job,  and we improved our behavior as a result; grades differed, trophies were given out to those of us who actually won an event, not merely participated in it, and being patriotic didn't get our parents an IRS audit.

My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about Islamic terrorism and suspense.  In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist, Zed Nill, a journalist, captured by terrorists and who is destined to be killed if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners.  Of course, American policy demands we never give in to terrorists, and for Zed, the clock is ticking.

                                             

Jihad Joe Soft Cover

click here for ebook version   

Tweet

We'll Have Fun Fun Fun Now That Barry Took Incentive Away Now

President Obama wants to extend unemployment benefits for at least a million Americans, in spite of the fact that four million jobs are actually available at this time. But who can blame our president--he just wants to give a helping hand to those Americans who are too incapacitated to work. 

"My Teleprompter says . . . "

Wait. . . this just in: these unemployed people are actually able-bodied men and women who have grown accustomed to  staying home studying law via Judge Judy, and social science, via As the World Turns. Some of these unemployed are going so far as to study medicine via General Hospital. And like the soap operas and Judge Judy shows, the benefits seem to go on and on, having no end in sight.

When you pay people to stay home, they tend to stay home. When unemployment poses no emergency, they have no incentive to get off their duff and look for work, or even when they do, the jobs they interview for aren't exactly what they're looking for, so they keep looking. They become very selective.

If Lies Were Money, There'd Be No National Debt

You can get more accurate information from a Chinese fortune cookie than you can from Healthcare.gov. At least the fortune cookie company can't compromise your personal information so that when you get home after a hard days work, you'll find the home still belongs to you And you can't eat ObamaCare.

At some level, I hate to admit, the American public is getting what they voted for. But to make things better, they need to feel the pain of ObamaCare so, like Pelosi might say, they can pass on it before they need to know what's not covered. 

If you like your doctor, perhaps you can meet your doctor for a drink or a game of golf. Heck, you might even run into Barry on the links. If you like your health care, that's nice. Maybe you'll like what they have in store for you too. Maybe not. But hey, we're all in this together. Like the Billy Joel song says, "And we will all go down together."

But Barack didn't lie. He misspoke. He had a misunderstanding of the facts. He misinterpreted reality. He repeated what he heard on the news. It was not his fault. It was the GOP and other things starting with "G."

Finally, Obama's statement about keeping your doctor and coverage was dubbed the "Lie of the Year," by Politifact. What might have been even more interesting would be to come up with Obama's biggest lies of each year he has been in office. Just imagine if all of Obama's high echelon staff grew longer noses every time they told a lie to the public: Carney would accidentally kill Biden with his nose while Biden was in the middle of giving Obama a nasal enema; and I hate to say what would happen to Michelle--use your imagination.

But seriously, let's do what George Carlin once suggested: let's not vote anymore, "it only encourages the bastards."

Tweet

Same O Same O

I believe Obama's speech today was around an hour and 7 minutes long and was probably his best soporific he has given so far. The reason for this is because it was a repeat of his past speeches, but this one sounded worn out and less enthusiastic. And why should Obama have an ounce of enthusiasm left anyway, he's a lame duck with nothing but words to convince the easily convinced liberals that he's a great president, perhaps the greatest of all times. If only the GOP would get out of the way, he could lead this country to prosperity and yadda yadda yadda, George Bush. Okay, to be fair, he didn't mention GW by name, but he probably will next time.

It was entertaining to listen to Austan Goolsbee on Hannity trying to defend Obama's statements about Detroit. He made the claim that he had saved Detroit from bankruptcy then, and obviously was wrong. Goolsbee claimed Obama never said that but was instead referring to the fact that by "Detroit" Obama meant the car industry. Since when does the name of a town translate into a company or group of companies? It was lame and there's no doubt that most people, liberals being the exception, were able to see how he tap danced around Obama's failure.

The Stench of Benghazi Lingers

Something smells real bad

Jay Carney spoke with White House reporters this afternoon in a closed door, off-the-record meeting to lie about Benghazi and get the press to go along with it in the hopes of convincing them that the Obama administration is competent and non-seditious. This came after Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard uncovered emails sent from the administration, (primarily the State Department), and Jonathan Karl of ABC News got most of the credit for the "exclusive." It seems clear now that Carney's claim that the only changes that took place from the original report was that the word "embassy" was changed to reflect the type of facility the Benghazi killing field actually was--more like a consulate with an American ambassador rather than an embassy with an American ambassador. Well, with this new evidence, it seems that the Obama administration was being less than truthful, which is the PC way of saying they lied like cheap rugs.

You can see from the timeline just how the changes took place seen here and judge for yourself. Remember, Carney insisted that they relied solely on CIA talking points that the intelligence community wrote and revised. 

On "Good Morning America," Jonathan Karl said that many of the changes of the emails came from Victoria Nuland, the State Department spokesperson. She said that the information of the CIA warnings could be used by members of Congress to "beat up the State Department for not paying attention to warnings, so why would we want to feed that . . . ?"


It seems that the motivation for all the editing in the emails was to ensure that each incompetent department within the Obama administration was not seen as incompetent. I mean, why go there? It might make Hillary look incompetent too when she got that call at 2:00 AM.

I would simply like to know where Obama was, what did he do when he found out about it, and why is he not impeached.

Tweet

This Just In: Benghazi Attack Was Pre-Planned

Liar's Club

The attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi was a spontaneous reaction to an anti Muhammad video viewed by over 300 people at the time of the outbreak of violence. It was not a pre-planned, premeditated attack.  Wait.  The attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi was a pre-planned, premeditated terrorist attack perpetrated by Hezbollah and resulted in the death of Chris Stevens and three other Americans.  I don't know how I got that wrong.  Actually, I don't know how Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton, Victoria Nuland, David Axelrod, Jay Carney and Hussein Obama got it wrong. 

 I don't know how Charlene Lamb, a security official for our embassies, got it wrong too when she failed to provide sufficient security for Ambassador Stevens. Even Susan Rice gets more security than the Libyan Consulate had, and being a native New Yorker, I don't believe New York is all that dangerous compared to most Islamic countries.  I suspect if Ms. Lamb was stationed in Libya and was in charge of providing her own security and that of her family, there would have been far more boots on the ground gunned to the teeth.  The walls would have been higher, more impenetrable, meeting those security specifications that were allowed to be overlooked when Stevens was alive.  

There's an irony about an administration that calls Mitt Romney a liar and goes about lying to the American public.  In psychology that's called projection.  One thing you can count on is that whatever the Obama folks say, the opposite is likely true.  

My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about Islamic terrorism and suspense.  In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist, Zed Nill, a journalist, captured by terrorists and who is destined to be killed if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners.  Of course, American policy demands we never give in to terrorists, and for Zed, the clock is ticking.

Jihad Joe Soft Cover       

click here for ebook version   

Tweet

Obama: "Yes, I'm the Great Pretender"

The Three Stooges 

Obama refuses to do anything but pretend to have Israel's back as Iran continues to enrich uranium.  And while he pretends that there is no threat to Israel, Obama pretends that the terrorist attack on the US Consulate in Libya was not a terrorist attack, but a spontaneous demonstration fueled by an anti-Muhammad YouTube trailer that was viewed by about 300 people throughout the world.  Then to make matters more muddled, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and Jay Carney all stated the same tune: it was not a terrorist attack, but a video-inspired demonstration.  

Even if the three monkeys: See No Evil, Hear No Evil and Speak No Evil Unless It's About Romney were telling the truth (which would inspire me to go out and buy a lottery ticket), the video is irrelevant.  In the USA we still have the right to speak our mind, and while this may change one day, if the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR get their way, freedom of expression is still Constitutional.  This is why the left is free to mock Christianity and have pseudo art exhibits with a Crucifix inundated with the "artist's" urine, or have the Virgin Mary covered in feces.  Have you noticed these artists never have renditions of the prophet of Islam having sex with his 9 year old wife, Ayisha, or Mo's beheading of an entire tribe of Qurayish  Jews.

But if you want to pass blasphemy laws that prohibit attacks on any religions as demanded by the Muslims, you would have to close down all the mosques in the country and prohibit the religion that's calling for the law in the first place.  No other religion actually addresses other religions with such intolerance as Islam does.  They pray against the Jews, they say vile things about the Virgin Mary and Jesus, and they call for the death of all non-believers.  How quaint.

So while we still have freedom of expression, we clearly have no reason to apologize to those barbarians who killed our people over some crappy little video that was used merely as an excuse.  It was never about a video and now the Obama administration has to admit this fact--they knew about an impending terrorist attack within 24 hours after Chris Stevens and three other men were killed in Benghazi but still they lied to us.  

If Obama's administration lied to us about the Benghazi attack because the conservative media uncovered it, what is this administration lying to us about that hasn't been uncovered?  Based on what we see in the liberal media, Obama is counting on the American public to remain ignorant, and to be gullible.  Unfortunately, there are plenty of those people around--we call them liberals.

My latest novel, Jihad Joe, is about Islamic terrorism and suspense.  In it I challenge the precepts of the religion through my protagonist, Zed Nill, a journalist, captured by terrorists and who is destined to be killed if the American President refuses to release three Gitmo prisoners.  Of course, American policy demands we never give in to terrorists, and for Zed, the clock is ticking.

Jihad Joe Soft Cover       

click here for ebook version   

Tweet

Indian Names of Liberals You Love

After waking in the middle of the night, caffinated thoughts running through my dreams, I have decided that it is essential to assign Indian names to certain liberals who, I feel, needs such a moniker to help define who they are. I apologize to all native Americans, first, for the term "Indian Name" and second, for associating them with the liberals listed below.  If you have other Indian names you might like to add to this list, please feel free to write in the comments section and I will be happy to add them, if they are suitable. Please do not use profane names, which is not to say profanity would not best describe certain liberals, but this is a family blog. I hope to add more names in the future and with your help, we can have the whole tribe of liberals appropriately labeled. We can use more than one name for any liberal who deserves another name.

Barack Hussein Obama: Dances with Islam

Joe Biden: Head Where Odors Dwell

Tim Geithner: Running Numbers

Jay Carney: Kissing Buttocks 

Bill Clinton: Chasing Beaver

Hillary Clinton: Pointing Fingers

Nancy Pelosi: Shines Through Both Ears

Harry Reid: Whispers Falsehoods

Chuck Schumer: Smelling Odors 

Barney Frank: Dropping Soap Scout

Anthony Weiner: Flashes Monkey

Michael Moore: Breaking Wind

Chris Matthews: Night Loon Squawking

Brian Williams: Master Debater Moderator

Rachel Maddow: Dances With Princesses

Martin Basher: Tush Wisdom

Ron Paul: Did Not Read It

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

click here for ebook version

Tweet