Colorado terrorist tried to buy a gun but failed: he's an illegal alien

Here’s a shocker: Mohamed Sabry Soliman, an Egyptian national illegally in the U.S., wanted to unleash a mass shooting on a group of pro-Israel demonstrators in Colorado but got tripped up by his own lawbreaking status. 

Court filings reveal that the anti-Semite “had to use Molotov cocktails after he was denied the purchase of a gun due to him not being a legal citizen.” That’s right, gun laws actually worked this time, forcing this terrorist to pivot to firebombs and a makeshift flamethrower. But don’t let that fool you into thinking this was some spur-of-the-moment tantrum. This scumwafer had been plotting chaos for over a year.

Boulder County District Attorney Michael Dougherty laid it out at a Monday press conference: Soliman, whose visa expired in February 2023, tried to buy a gun to slaughter demonstrators supporting hostages in Gaza. He even took a concealed carry class to prep for his rampage. But when he hit a brick wall at the gun shop—thanks to his illegal status—he didn’t just give up. Instead, he “researched on YouTube how to make Molotov Cocktails, purchased the ingredients to do so, and constructed them,” according to court documents. This wasn’t some amateur hour; it was calculated.

The Department of Homeland Security confirmed Soliman’s illegal status. Spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin didn’t mince words: “The Colorado Terrorist attack suspect, Mohamed Soliman, is illegally in our country. He entered the country in August 2022 on a B2 visa that expired on February 2023. He filed for asylum in September 2022.” 

So, this guy’s been gaming the system while plotting to kill.

Soliman now faces 16 counts of first-degree murder, plus charges for using incendiary devices and assault. If convicted, he’s looking at over 600 years behind bars, per Dougherty. His attack left a dozen people injured, though thankfully, no fatalities. 

He allegedly went after the demonstrators with firebombs and a jerry-rigged flamethrower, targeting a group supporting Israel. FBI Director Kash Patel didn’t hesitate to call it what it is: a “targeted terror attack.” Federal prosecutors agree, slapping Soliman with a hate crime charge.

And get this—Soliman told investigators he “wanted to kill all Zionist people and wished they were all dead.” He tried to spin it, claiming “this had nothing to do with the Jewish community and was specific in the Zionist group supporting the killings of people on his land,” court documents say. Sure, pal. Sounds like a distinction without a difference when you’re lobbing Molotov cocktails at civilians.

This case is a glaring reminder: illegal immigration isn’t just a paperwork problem, it’s a national security issue. Soliman’s plot was foiled by a rare instance of the system catching a bad actor, but how many others are slipping through the cracks? 

And while the left keeps screaming about gun control, maybe it’s time they focus on securing the border to keep out people like Soliman, who are hell-bent on turning their hatred into body counts.

Hey guys, if you like my blog,  feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee  It’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused, albeit somewhat hyper. No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Mom exercises her 2nd Amendment Rights and castle domain to protect her family

San Antonio, Texas -- Police said a man entered the home of a San Antonio mother of three from the rear of the building at about 10 pm. He then attempted to break into the door leading into the main part of the house where the woman and her children were located, according to KSAT-TV. 

The unidentified woman who is in her 30s, heard noises that she identified as an intruder.

When the man entered, she shot him twice in the chest, according to KABB-TV. The police came and the intruder was taken to the hospital but died on the way. The network reported that the woman will not face charges under what is known as castle domain. This doctrine permits individuals to use the necessary force needed for the protection of themselves at their home or place of work. 

As of this past Friday, the dead man's identity has not been released by law enforcement and the woman's identity also remains undisclosed.

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

Regarding the castle domain doctrine, Texas has some of the strongest self-defense and defense of property laws in the country. The right to keep and bear arms is part of our natural, immutable rights to defend ourselves and our liberty from crime and the tyranny of government.

If the left had their way across the nation, this woman and her children, might be dead. 

Tweet

Dick's will stop selling scary-looking rifles

Dick's Sporting Goods will no longer sell AR-15s because they're better than the people who have the audacity to want one.

They will, however, continue to sell semi-automatic rifles such as the Savage 10/22 carbine, and the Remington 597 semi-automatic rifle for starters. These are not considered "assault-type" weapons because they don't look scary to the average "Pajama Boy" snowflake.

On Wednesday, Dick's Sporting Goods announced they will no longer sell "assault-type rifles," indicating that they don't know what an assault rifle is and it's probably for the better that people don't count on their "expertise" to make a Second Amendment decision.

The company's decision came after they were lectured by a group of teenagers who, by virtue of them being survivors of the Parkland, Florida school shooting, were now experts on gun control legislation.

This is the second time that Dick's enacted a policy banning the sale of certain types of firearms after a mass shooting, and the results of their first ban can be seen in the second ban.

In a press release aimed at virtue signaling, Dick's said that "thoughts and prayers are not enough."  On that note, Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel said that "if thoughts and prayers were rabbits and snails, O.J. Simpson would be playing football again."

The idiots at Dick's said they made the decision because "we sold a shotgun to the Parkland shooter in November of 2017. It was not the gun, nor type of gun, he used in the shooting. But it could have been."

It's a little known factoid that Dick's used to sell trucks and vans but stopped doing so after the myriad attacks by terrorists using them as weapons. 

They have also stopped selling knives, entrenching tools and tent pins, all of which have been known to kill people. In fact, knives kill more people each year than guns, particularly long rifles.

Dick's has no plans to stop the sale of their handguns and are considering opening a new store in Detroit and Chicago.

Due to their marketing genius and lack of thoughts and prayers, the value of their stock has been cut nearly in half over the last 18 months.

But you simply cannot forget their motto: "You can't beat Dick's for value."


Tweet

Gun shoots cop in the name of Islam

An unnamed man ambushed a Philadelphia police officer, Jessie Hartnett saying that he did it in the name of Islam, sources told KYW-TV. My guess is the man's name is some derivative of the name "Mohammad."

According to the same source, the Islamic terrorist gave a full confession.

Thankfully, Officer Hartnett is in stable condition due to the obvious lack of marksmanship on the part of the scumcrumpet. He fired at Hartnett 13 times and struck him in the left arm 3 times, Police Commissioner Richard Ross reported. 

"This is absolutely one of the scariest things I've ever seen," Ross said. "This guy tried to execute the police officer. The police officer had no idea he was coming."

Hartnett was able to return fire after being taken by surprise and hit the Mohammad-Wannabee 3 times. Black Lives Matter plans to investigate whether or not the return fire was justified. Well, maybe not.

The jihadist ran from the scene after he got back what he gave; his condition is not known to the public.

Sobriety test?

The Mayor of Philadelphia Jim Kenney, a Democrat who, like Obama, blames the gun, said, "There are just too many guns on the streets and I think our national government needs to do something about that." 

He might as well have said: "If we could just get guns off the streets, those criminals won't be able to get guns and the streets would be safer."

He has been on the job for one week and already politicized a jihadist attack on a police officer--Obama should be proud. It would have been nice if he simply gave his well-wishes to the officer and his family. 

The hard truth is, however, liberals are more concerned with the politics than the people. It's the politics that makes them feel good about themselves, not the results of their irrational thinking.


Tweet

A Dozen Questions by a Conservative

1. If Starbucks can refuse service to gun owners, why can't a photographer refuse service to people they don't want to serve? What about bakery owners? Starbucks is anti-gun and believes that they have the right to refuse people service, even the police who may be carrying guns and simply want a cup of bitter coffee. 

On the other hand, a Catholic parade, Saint Patrick's, lost the sponsorship of Diageo, the parent company of Guinness and Heineken, and Sam Adams Beer, in New York City and Boston, respectively. The parade organizers refused to make the parade an endorsement for gays advertising their sexuality and the beer companies rescinded their sponsorship. Gay banners announcing sexual orientation have nothing to do with the parade.

2. Why do people who attack God, symbols of religion, and Christianity more specifically, fail to attack Islam, and even defend it in some cases? I suspect the answer is simple: our Judeo-Christian practices are peaceful and make for easy targets. Islam, on the other hand, is not so peaceful, especially when even mildly criticized. But maybe I'm misguided. What do you think?

3. How has president Obama's policies made America stronger, safer, and respected by the world community?

4. Why is there no outcry from women's organizations like NOW, against the treatment of women in Islamic countries?

5. Why hasn't gay or lesbian groups like GLAAD spoken out against the treatment of gays in Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and other Muslim nations? They complain like hell when we refuse them the chance to march in our straight parades, but maybe if we did the same thing they do in Iran, hang them from public scaffolding for their crime against Allah, they'd sing a different tune. Maybe a show tune.

6. Why do liberals say the discussion is over about climate change? And why did they change the term to "global warming?" All of the facts are not in, and much of what we know is only theory.

7. Why hasn't congress done anything of substance to Hillary, Holder, and Lerner?

8. Why isn't there a real outcry, a livid response, about the fact that a number of people of the Muslim Brotherhood have visited our White House and met with Obama and nothing was revealed about the substance?

9. Why don't conservatives boycott companies that espouse anti-American and/or anti-Constitutional sentiments?

10.Why do we allow politicians to skirt around the issues and refuse to answer questions?

11. Why do liberals think that blacks should only vote the way they would like blacks to vote? Do they believe that blacks should not have free will?

12. Has Jay Carney ever told the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? What about his boss?



Tweet