Hell to the Liar in Chief

"Thanks to sacrifice and service of our brave men and women in uniform, the war in Iraq is over, the war in Afghanistan is winding down, al Qaeda has been decimated, Osama bin Laden is dead." --  Spoken by our Liar in Chief, Barack Hussein Obama, on November 1, 2012. 

Talking points, but far from the truth.

It has now been learned that the Liar in Chief covered up the al Qaeda threat that was uncovered in the documents from the Bin Laden raid.

 Is this treason?

Obama's White House depicted al Qaeda as a terror group virtually brought to its knees, even after the Sensitive Site Exploitation team retrieved an enormous number of secret documents in Bin Laden's possession that showed otherwise.

The team was able to grab 10 hard drives, over 90 thumb drives, and 12 cell phones. In addition, there were audio and video tapes, DVDs, data cards, newspapers, magazines and handwritten material.

Just days after the raid, a senior military intelligence official stated at a Pentagon briefing, that the raid was "the single largest collection of senior terrorist material ever." Basically, the US had grabbed al Qaeda's playbook: its operations, future plans and its recent history.

The ball was now in Obama's court, and you know how he sucks at basketball.

Instead of being honest with the American public, he did what he always does: he lied for political reasons. Stephen Hayes uncovered the story in The Wall Street Journal about how "Obama White House Covered Up Al Qaeda in Bin Laden Docs."

The article shows how our national security is so screwed up because the administration staffers are obsessed with micromanaging everything to fit the political agenda of the White House. For example, law enforcement and intelligence agencies are told to cover up things and are given nonsensical orders to carry out.

Moreover, Obama's lies, like his sealed personal history, was never questioned by the mainstream media.

A year after the bin Laden raid, in a speech commemorating the event, John Brennan, a top counterterrorism adviser (and perhaps the only non-Muslim to visit the Hajj, unless he is, in fact, a Muslim) predicted the demise of al Qaeda. The following day, May 1, 2012, the Liar in Chief said: "The goal that I set--to defeat al Qaeda and deny it a chance to rebuild--is now within our reach."

The Obama administration back-engineered the evidence for the president's lies. They only chose 17 documents and provided them to the Combatting Terror Center at West Point M.A. There, a team of analysts reached Obama's desired conclusion: Bin Laden was alone and powerless, a sad lonely dude, watching porn in his room, as his terror network was falling apart.

Our so-called president has built his entire reputation on lies and secrecy. It doesn't get any more disturbing than that.

Tweet

The Stench of Benghazi Lingers

Something smells real bad

Jay Carney spoke with White House reporters this afternoon in a closed door, off-the-record meeting to lie about Benghazi and get the press to go along with it in the hopes of convincing them that the Obama administration is competent and non-seditious. This came after Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard uncovered emails sent from the administration, (primarily the State Department), and Jonathan Karl of ABC News got most of the credit for the "exclusive." It seems clear now that Carney's claim that the only changes that took place from the original report was that the word "embassy" was changed to reflect the type of facility the Benghazi killing field actually was--more like a consulate with an American ambassador rather than an embassy with an American ambassador. Well, with this new evidence, it seems that the Obama administration was being less than truthful, which is the PC way of saying they lied like cheap rugs.

You can see from the timeline just how the changes took place seen here and judge for yourself. Remember, Carney insisted that they relied solely on CIA talking points that the intelligence community wrote and revised. 

On "Good Morning America," Jonathan Karl said that many of the changes of the emails came from Victoria Nuland, the State Department spokesperson. She said that the information of the CIA warnings could be used by members of Congress to "beat up the State Department for not paying attention to warnings, so why would we want to feed that . . . ?"


It seems that the motivation for all the editing in the emails was to ensure that each incompetent department within the Obama administration was not seen as incompetent. I mean, why go there? It might make Hillary look incompetent too when she got that call at 2:00 AM.

I would simply like to know where Obama was, what did he do when he found out about it, and why is he not impeached.

Tweet