Biden's teleprompter in Oval Office address

Teleprompter Joe 

His eyes never left the words written for him on the teleprompter as our alleged President Joe Biden read the Oval Office address about the assassination attempt on former President Trump on Saturday. Unfortunately for Biden, he gave the address after his bedtime, just when "sundowner syndrome" kicks in and the brain becomes pudding-like.

Old Joe bumbled and mumbled his way through the reading, which may have been written by AI or Ron Klain, and had the sincerity of a prostitute who fakes a you-know-what.

At times Biden stumbled over his words, even referring to the "ballot box" as a ""battle box"." He even referred to Trump as "former Trump." The bullet graze must have definitely hurt as it hit his ear, but it didn't make him a former Trump, only the next President of the United States.

Nevertheless, Biden said that we all need to turn the dangerous rhetoric down, but he never added "including me," which would have gone a long way toward his being seen as sincere.

Overall, Biden's teleprompter was disgusting and tone-deaf because the words he read strayed off topic and brought up Gretchen Whitmer and January 6 as a way to deflect having any hand in the assassination attempt. No mention was written on the teleprompter that a gun was fired, a former President was hit by a bullet and an innocent man was killed. 

Equating what happened to Whitmer, where all charges were dropped, and January 6th, where the only person killed was Ashli Babbitt, who was killed by Capitol Police Lieutenant Michael Byrd, was ludicrous. 

The vegetable who read that we need to "lower the temperature," has been guilty, along with his fellow Democrats and media of raising concerns that Trump was Hitler, and a threat to democracy.

Hell, it was the duty of every red-blooded American to stop the threat, if you believe those leftists.

Joe Biden says he wants to “lower the temperature” in our country: pic.twitter.com/sVDzvlf9fm— Conservative War Machine (@WarMachineRR) July 15, 2024

Two days before Trump was shot, Biden labeled the former president a dictator. 

Two weeks before that, Biden said Trump was a "genuine threat to the nation" who would end democracy and take away people's freedoms. For him to now pretend to be above it all, demanding others lower the temperature is the height of hypocrisy. He should have spent his Oval Office address directly refuting his own rhetoric. Instead, he gaslit the public about his culpability.

“Let’s lower the temperature, Jack. C’mon. That’s number one. Number two, the idea that the fact of the matter is, anyway.” pic.twitter.com/TTUwLGnp70— Reverently Based 🇻🇦 (@node_cathode) July 15, 2024

Biden: “In a democracy, arguments are made in good faith.” In Biden's world and the world of the Left, arguments are made for personal gain.

Katie Pavlich reminded us when Biden called Donald Trump Hitler and needed to be stopped.

Is this what Biden and the entire Democratic Party was doing when they called Trump Hitler, a man who needed to be stopped “at all costs,” “eliminated,” and an “existential threat to Democracy.”— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) July 15, 2024

It should have been called the Awful Office Address because it was awful. To think that Biden and his cronies can lecture the American people about decency and lowering the temperature of the nation when it was him and Democrats who put a bullseye on President Trump's head. 

The combination of divine providence and crappy marksmanship helped avoid a horrible outcome.

WARNING: Do not believe what you hear about a Trump landslide in November. That leads to complacency and lower voter turnout. You must vote because they want us all to stay home.

Tweet

Jibberish Joe Screws Up Milwaukee Speech on "Bidenomics"

When you really gotta go, you gotta go

Alleged President Joe Biden had a veritable clusterfrack of jibberishly delightful gobble-dee-gook when he appeared in Milwaukee, WI to brag about "Bidenomics." It's actually a smart play on his part if he actually knows what he's doing [doubtful], because it takes the focus away from his shady business dealings involving foreign governments and his crack-smoking whoring son Hunter. 

But let us not kid ourselves, the White House handler[s] sending out positive balderdash on Biden's fiscal policies [aka 'Bidenomics'] are trying to distract the public from the fact that the country is headed by a creepy, hair-sniffing, self-serving, low IQ, lying scumcrumpet with two brain cells, one of which is on life support. As a messenger, Biden is as useful as an ashtray to a blowfish.

The so called 'Bidenomics' lie was put out earlier this year and the administration desperately wants to make that the message they are known for, but the guy they're relying on to present it is to the nation is incompetent and as incoherent as a houseplant.

The President of the United States had a rough start because he didn't even make it to the podium and was nowhere to be found when introduced by Rep. Gwen Moore.

Democrat Rep. Gwen Moore introduces Biden — who is nowhere to be found.

"Uh-oh. Well, I'm a little underwhelmed, aren't you all? I think I messed up." pic.twitter.com/HCeg9tqqEg— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) August 15, 2023

When he finally found the podium things got worse.

He first tried to brag about passing the oxymoronically named Inflation Reduction Act but sure as what bears do in the woods, "Gibberish Joe" was his old, depends-wearing self.

You've got to click on the link below by RNC Research. If you can understand what Biden is saying, please put it in the comments:

The bipartisan what? pic.twitter.com/zNpmfut39T— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) August 15, 2023

His babbling is sadly unintelligible and he failed in his attack of Gov. Greg Abbott, which was both senile and false, which isn't easy to do:

Biden stumbles through an attempt at insulting Texas Gov. Greg Abbott pic.twitter.com/LrQhmHKnSn— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) August 15, 2023

BIDEN: Texas, the state of Texas, the very...enlighted governor, a very state of Texas has, a signific... highest number of wind and solar facilities, I think of any state in the nation, and it's cheaper than fossil fuel. (Whispers) He wants to shut them down. Isn't that enlighted?

Wind and solar is not "cheaper" than fossil fuels but the left would have us believe that lie. While building wind or solar facilities is cheaper at the start, they are much less efficient and have huge long-term maintenance costs and do not produce cheaper energy. Biden was making sounds from his mouth but they were lies.

There is no evidence Gov. Abbott wants to shut down the wind and solar facilities--it seems that Biden pulled those facts from his nether regions.

And then he told the old familiar blarney about the Amtrak choo-choo train story that has been

 debunked many times over in which he spins the yarn about an Amtrak conductor who told him, when he was VP, that he rode millions of miles on AF2l and Amtrak. Except that conductor retired in 1992 and died in 2014 before Biden even reached a million miles [in 2015].

And Biden claims he has "cut the debt" by $1.7 trillion, His son Beau died in Iraq. He had two college scholarships. He graduated in the top half of his law school class. And he went up against Corn Pop.

His lips were moving.

Tweet

New poll shows Biden's blunder attacking Americans in his speech

It was probably not a great idea for Biden to use September 1st for his speech as it was the 83rd anniversary of Adolf Hitler's invasion of Poland. But as a guy who graduated in the lower half of his class, with a 1.9 Grade Point Average [where 3.0 is average] old Joe probably isn't much of a history buff as much as he's a buffoon. Yes, he graduated 506 out of 688 in his class, not she sharpest knife on the tree.

Trafalgar Group, in partnership with the Convention of States, has a new poll out,  showing just how boneheaded Biden and his handlers were with the latest tactic in which he demonized 75 million MAGA Americans, calling them a "clear and present danger" to the country.

For over a week, the so-called President went hard against conservatives and ended it off with his Hitlerian primetime speech last Thursday. However, when he heard how the nation reacted to his speech, he backpedaled the next day denying that he meant all Republicans. His speech was so grotesque that even the Compromised News Network (CNN) called out his use of Marines standing ominously in the background. 

Incompetent White House lesbian-of-color Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was asked if Biden was planning to apologize for what he said--she had no answer.

Now the numbers are in, and they show what a stupid move this tactic was. Biden obviously did this to try and whip up his base–hoping that they would get out and “vote, vote, vote”–as he implored them to do during the gaslighting speech they claimed was “non-political.” [When a liberal tells you one thing, believe the opposite to be true.]

Likely voters were polled over what they thought about an American president accusing his political opponents of “an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic.”

The majority of likely voters (56.8%) believes the speech  “represents a dangerous escalation in rhetoric and is designed to incite conflict amongst Americans.” While that sounds like a healthy number, it's hard to believe that more people failed to see it that way as 35.5% said the speech was an "acceptable" campaign message in an election year. Hey, I thought the speech was not political. 

Of that 35.5%, most (70.8%) were Democrats who saw no problem with the Biden bile.

In the polling, 89.1 percent of Republicans said it was a “dangerous escalation,” with 4.7 percent saying it was acceptable, which is not very Republican. 

Most importantly, independent likely voters in large part (62.4%) called Biden's speech a "dangerous escalation." Biden is circling the bowl with this group and that's good news for Republicans, and matches the new YouGov poll that found him tanking with these voters in approval generally, at only 26.7 percent approval and 64.1 percent disapproval.

“These numbers reveal that most voters were sickened and deeply disturbed by what they saw last week. When you couple this finding with previous polling we did indicating a majority of voters also hold President Biden responsible for America’s divisions—it’s clear that the man who promised to unite the nation has become the most divisive President in American history,” said Mark Meckler, President of the Convention of States.

“When voters tell you they think that the prepared remarks of a sitting President of the United States is a dangerous escalation and was designed to incite conflict, we are living in terrifying times. Perhaps even more terrifying is the fact that a huge majority of Democrats think this was just a routine, election year stump speech,” Meckler said.

“This is the tyranny the founders of America foresaw, and it’s why they included an emergency provision in Article V that empowers the states to reign in an out-of-control federal government. A Convention of States needs to happen and urgently,” he added.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Whoever the ideologue is that's behind Biden's speech and actions [and we know he isn't doing anything on his own aside from hair-sniffing and crapping himself] they did not get the result they hoped for in this speech.

Tweet

Vets blasts Biden's use of Marines as props as WH makes excuses

Most people with lives to live did not watch the Biden-Satan speech on Thursday but many have seen it, or at least parts of the hateful speech, on various websites, YouTube or as news items on TV. Biden's disgustingly divisive political speech in front of Independence Hall in Philadelphia, seemed ominous, angry, and hyper-partisan in which he attacked Republican voters and labeled all MAGA Trump supporters as a "clear and present danger."

The worst part is that Biden used two Marines as background props as this soulless garbage of a president preached of his saving the soul of America from everyone who does not agree with his ideology--or at least the ideology of the person behind the curtain pulling his strings. The backdrop was a dark blood-red as the Marines in their dress blues, stood behind, off to the sides in their white gloves at attention.

Aside from the fact that Biden once said that he would never use the military as props and did so anyway, many veterans [myself included] are pissed at him for doing so. The only positive thing about this is that many people who are not military veterans will be equally perturbed of what he did as he gave his soulless speech.

Rear Adm. Rachel Levine as he gets sworn in

The military is supposed to be nonpolitical, in spite of idiots like Gen. Mark Milley making it woke, and Rear Adm. Rachel Levine making it gay. [He puts the 'rear' in Rear Admiral.]

Biden, by the way, inappropriately used the Marine Corps Band at a campaign event for Democrats in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania earlier this week. There were reports after the political event that some of my brother Marines were "unsettled" when they learned that they were at a political event.

Putin and Xi drink to Rachel Levine's Admiralty 

Now Concerned Veterans for America, a veterans organization, is slamming Biden for using the Marines as props during his disgusting speech. It warns that doing so erodes trust in the military, but Milley and Levine were also instrumental in making our military an international joke.

Concerned Veterans for America deputy director and U.S. Marine Corps veteran John Byrnes blasted Biden for having Marines visibly positioned behind him during his inflammatory speech on Thursday, in which he said that the influence of “MAGA Republicans” on the GOP “is a threat to this country.”

Byrnes said that American “men and women in uniform serve the country, not a party” and “take a solemn oath that should not be taken lightly or taken advantage of.”

“When elected officials use our troops as props in political and partisan messaging, it undermines the nonpartisan nature of our military and erodes trust in the institution,” Byrnes warned.

Some government watchdogs think Biden may have violated military code. The White House said that no, Marines weren't being used as props, it was Biden showing his respect for their service, which is total bullshit and anyone who thinks otherwise is oblivious to reality.

A White House official told Fox News Digital the “President gave an important speech last night about our democracy and our values, values that our men and women in uniform fight every day to protect.”

And that too, boys and girls, is total bullshit they are trying to sell you.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

The day after the speech, Biden said that he didn't believe the words he used against the "MAGA Republicans," agreeing that they are not a clear and present danger to the country. So he either forgot he said those words [very possible] or is a damn liar [which we know he is]. 

Two things can be true at once.

Tweet

Biden 'steps in it' regarding Trump supporters, tries to walk it back

"What did I say that offended Trump supporters?"

Which  Biden do you believe: the one who says that Trump supporters are a "clear and present danger" on Friday then on Saturday realizes he stepped in dog crap with his hateful words that isn't polling well so he now says that he no longer considers Donald Trump supporters to be a "threat?"

He backtracked on his statement by amending it by saying not condemning violence for political gains was "inappropriate." He doesn't consider former President Trump's supporters to be "a threat to the country" after all.

The irony is that Biden's backtracking his words is exactly for political gains. The administration evidently got some backlash and is attempting to do some repair work.

The alleged President's 24-minute speech was delivered Thursday at 8 p.m. in front of Philadelphia's Independence Hall. It was backlit in red with a pair of white-gloved Jarheads [US Marines] standing in the background. It looked like a rally in a 1930s Germany, sans mustache and swastika, but it had a surreal feeling visually, and Biden's angry tone gave it even more of that nuance.

Friday saw a different Joe Biden whereby he said that he didn't mean to impugn all Trump supporters [and still hopes they vote Democratic in November and beyond]. But his words said otherwise.

“When people voted for Donald Trump — and support him now — they weren’t voting for attacking the Capitol,” Biden said. “They weren’t voting for overruling the election. They were going for a philosophy he put forward.”

He added that he doesn’t consider just “any Trump supporter [to be] a threat to the country” and said his speech was only directed at Trump supporters who support violence or deny that he won the 2020 election fairly. 

“I do think anyone who calls for the use of violence, fails to condemn violence when it’s used, refuses to acknowledge an election has been won, insists upon changing the way in which the rules and we count votes, that is a threat to democracy,” he backtracked.

Even some critics on the Left besides those on the Right, called the speech divisive and “sinister,” because Biden did not differentiate between the various subsets of Trump supporters. He just called all of them "MAGA Republicans."

“Too much of what’s happening in our country today is not normal,” Biden said. “Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic.”

But Drag Queen Dances for young kids and Critical Race Theory are not extreme.

“There’s no question that the Republican Party today is dominated, driven, intimidated by Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans. And that is a threat to this country,” Biden continued. “MAGA Republicans have made their choice. They embrace anger. They thrive on chaos. They live not in the light of truth, but in the shadow of lies. Together, we can choose a different path.”

But Antifa and BLM do not thrive on chaos nor embrace anger.

At another point in the speech, Biden schizophrenically said that Trump supporters do not respect the document that had been signed in the historic building behind him.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Meanwhile, Democrats have long been saying the U.S. Constitution is outdated and besides, it was written by White slave holders.

You get it--whatever they say, think of the opposite and more often than not, you'll get the truth.

Tweet

Herr Josef Biden's [hate] speech analysis

Und wir werden das Mutterland vor den MAGA-Wählern schützen
[trans. And we will protect the motherland against the MAGA voters]

Joe Biden's speech was an angry assimilation of Hitler and Beelzebub, the content of which was the exact opposite of the words he used. Left was right, up was down, good was bad, and Joe was demented. Had the Presidential seal been replaced with a swastika, nobody would have been surprised. And believe me, I don't make Hitler or devil references as a rule.

He was guided to the podium by Doctor Jill Biden, his wife, who then kissed him. He covertly smelled her hair, realized he knew her and then she left him standing there all alone. 

Our empty-suited senile old fart of a POTUS mentioned "MAGA" 13 times in his speech that only G-d knows who wrote it. The most used word he said was "Democracy" which he mentioned 31 times, while only using Trump's name 3 times. The phrase "We, the people," was mentioned 9 times, 
extremism 7 times, the January 6 hoax 5 times, and "Republicans" 16 times.

No surprise that the word "violence" was mentioned 10 times, but not in terms of criminal violence, but tin terms of MAGA and white supremacist violence. So the word "crime" was not mentioned at all, nor were the words: fentanyl, China, inflation and border.

Biden's tone was angry, as usual, and he sounded like a "get-off-my-lawn" dementia patient.

Overall, the speech was politically schizophrenic, claiming that conservatives are against law and order and against the U.S. Constitution. The exact opposite is obviously true and the left have said it outright. 

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

But the most dangerous thing this so-called president said was that MAGA Republicans are "a clear and present danger." What that can only mean is that we must therefore be eliminated from the political scene using any means necessary. That's what this phrase means and that is disgusting.

Tweet

Trump kicks Oscar's butt

President Trump's first address to Congress Tuesday night was watched by 43.4 million people on TV, according to Neilson, and who knows how many on Smart Phones and computers.

Of course, Fox News was the most watched of all TV for the speech, with 10,765 million viewers and NBC (Nothing But Crapola) came in second with 9.144 million. 

Among the younger news demographics (ages 25 to 54) NBC came in first followed by Fox News.

These numbers beat out the Oscar Narcissistic Actors Awards by millions of viewers and Trump didn't get it wrong like the Oscars did.

Below is the comparison between the Trump/Oscars went.
Fox News: 10,765,000 / 2,784,000
NBC: 9,144,000 / 3,286,000
CBS: 7,156,000 / 1,897,000
ABC: 6,065,000 / 2,074,000
CNN: 3,944,000 / 1,517,000
FOX: 3,076,000 / 1,383,000
MSNBC: 2,683,000 / 669,000
FBN 593,000 / 118,000


Tweet

Madonna replaces rant with a lie

Madonna said that her 'F'-bomb-laced speech regarding her thoughts about wanting to blow up the White House during the Women's March on Sunday was "taken wildly out of context."

Wildly. Yes, it is those of us who believed our lying ears and eyes who didn't understand what she really meant.

The garbage-mouth irrelevant singer directed her ire at President Trump and told the crowd that she had been angry after the election and had thought "an awful lot about blowing up the White House."

Realizing that her threatening words could actually get her in trouble, she went on Instagram to "clarify" what she was "trying to say."

By 'blowing up,' she meant simply blowing, by the 'White House,' she simply meant the house down the street from where she lives because it's due for demolition and she was just trying to speed up the process.

But actually, she didn't really say that--I was only teasing.

What she meant by wanting to blow up the White House was actually her attempt at expressing her philosophy that there are two ways to respond to Trump's election: with hope [and not blow up the White House] or with outrage [and blowing up the White House and killing everyone inside]. She said she hopes to effect change "with love."

And by "love" she meant sex, and having it with as many anti-Trump people as humanly possible for a woman her advanced age.

Her Instagram propaganda said that she doesn't promote violence and we should listen to her speech [with the children out of the room] "in its entirety rather than one phrase taken wildly out of context."

Then we should buy her records.

After she performed for the crowd she led them in a chant of "I'M NOT YOUR BITCH!" 

She was just kidding.

What's not to love? 


Tweet

Trump meets the spook agency

Langley, VA -- Vice President Pence introduced President Donald Trump at the CIA Headquarters at Langley, Virginia at 3:19 p.m. 

When he appeared, Mr. Trump got a loud round of applause from the crowd. This was his first official stop and it seemed to be appreciated.

He said that nobody feels more strongly about the CIA than him. "I am so behind you. And i'm going to give you so much backing and you're gonna say 'we don't need so much backing' which made the crowd laugh at the remark that was remarkably similar to the "Win, win, win" remark he made on the campaign trail. 

He believed that almost everyone in the room voted for him, "because [we're] on the same wavelength," he said. 

"We have to get rid of ISIS. We have no choice. Radical Islamic terrorism has to be eradicated--this is evil, this is evil." This drew loud applause and positive shouts of approval.

He introduced Gen. Mike Flynn and Reince Priebus who were with him, and spoke of Mattis and Kelly who were approved for the cabinet positions. 

Trump also mentioned that Mike Pompeo didn't get confirmed yet for the CIA position because of the politics involved, but that Pompeo is a great choice to head the agency explaining that he was first in his class at West Point and excels at everything he does.

He spoke about the media and how they lie about him. For example, he said the media reported that only about 250,000 people showed up for his inauguration speech on Friday but he believes it was more like a million and a half, which led him to speak about other media mistreatment he received.

It was all rather trivial talk that we've heard before.

He told the CIA "I love you, I respect you; there's no one I respect more. We're going to be leading again and you're going to be leading the charge."

I suspect he was being hyperbolic, as usual, about respecting them more than anyone else.

It seems to me that President Trump is attempting to repair the past in terms of how he went against our intelligence community when it came to the Russian hacking. 

It was a smart move.



Tweet

An Obama speech template for future terrorist attacks

It is getting to the point where we can not only predict that there will be future terrorist attacks, as promised by Islamic groups, but can also predict the Obama administration's verbal reaction toward them. 

In order to save this administration time and effort so they can concentrate on more important things, like climate change and baseball, I have put together a template that can be used to respond to future terrorist attacks. 

It's clear by now that President Obama's strategy against Islamic jihad is to ignore it and maybe it will go away. Additionally, there is no way Barack Obama is going to allow terrorism to interfere with his fun or other scheduled events. 

That's what they want him to do, and if he gives in, the terrorists will have won. At least, that's the Obama non sequitur and he's sticking by it.

If FDR ignored the attack on Pearl Harbor, countless lives would have been saved at the expense of the smaller number suffered from the attack that morning; at least that's the current thinking with this so-called commander in chief.

So without further ado, below are some talking points Mr. Obama can use for future reactions to predictable Islamic terrorist attacks:

"We, as Americans, condemn the attack that occurred [today/yesterday] in {blank]. 

"Our hearts and prayers go out to the [fill in number] victims and the families of the victims. No words can take away their pain.

"Make no mistake, this inexplicable and senseless act of violence will not go unpunished. We will bring these extremists to justice. 

"However, we must remember that the attackers do not represent the millions of fine, decent Muslims who make up the very fabric of our nation. To think otherwise, or to plant the seeds of hatred toward these folks is not who we are as a nation. 

"So I'm calling upon all Americans to stay calm and vigilant. If you see something, say something. We are all in this together. 

"And finally, in order to make America safe again, we are making every effort to eliminate gun violence by taking the guns out of the hands of those who would use them for evil purposes." 

So there you have it, Mr. Obama. This is kind of the claptrap the American people expect from you and your minions.

If there are other talking points I've missed, please feel free to comment.



Tweet

Reading Obama's secret thoughts at his lecture to America

Thankfully, this is president Obama's last year in office. Let's hear what he has to dictate.

Biden realizes his fly is open

He returned from his taxpayer-funded Hawaiian vacation ($70 million in vacation spending thus far into his reign) to talk about the one thing that can bring tears to his eyes: gun control. 

As a world-renown mind-reader, I have the to go beyond his public words and tell you what was going on in his secret skull. Thus, I have taken the most relevant parts of his East Room chest-bumping speech and have added what he was thinking. Those private thoughts have been placed in parentheses and  italics for your convenience. 

I have left much of the speech out because the pharmacies are open today and you can get your own emetic without having to use this as one.

MR. OBAMA: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you everybody. Please have a seat (especially you, you fat old lady.) Thank you so much. (CLAP, CLAP, CLAP, CLAP)

Mark, I want to thank you for your introduction. I still remember the first time we met, the time we spent together. (I whispered to you 'a penny for your thoughts' and you just pretended not to hear me) and the conversation we had about Daniel.  (He so reminds me of that old Elton John song.) And that changed me that day. And my hope, earnestly, has been that it would change the country (into the United Socialist States of America).

Five years ago this week, a sitting member of Congress and 18 others were shot at, at a supermarket in Tucson, Arizona. It wasn't the first time I had to talk to the nation in response to a mass shooting (because I'm so damn awesome) nor would it be the last. Fort Hood (work place violence--they fell for it, hahahaha) Aurora, Oak Creek, Newtown, the Navy Yard, Santa Barbara, Charleston, San Bernadino. Too many.

OBAMABOT 1: Too many
OBAMABOT 2: Too many
OBAMABOT 3: Too many

MR. OBAMA: Thanks to a great medical team and the love of her husband, Mark, my dear friend and colleague, Gabby Giffords, survived. She's here with us today, with her wonderful mom. (CLAP, CLAP, CLAP, CLAP) Thanks to a great medical team, her wonderful husband, Mark--who, by the way, the last time I met with Mark--this is just a small aside (where the hell is that Tele Promp Ter?) you may know Mark's twin brother is in outer space. (HA HA HA HA)

I was there with Gabby when she was still in the hospital, and we didn't think necessarily at that point that she was going to survive. And that visit right before a memorial--about an hour later Gabby first opened her eyes. And I remember talking to mom about that. But I know the pain that she and her family have endured these past five years, and the rehabilitation and the work and the effort to recover from shattering injuries (that aren't covered under Obamacare today, but thankfully, she had better coverage by the government). 

And then I think of all the Americans who aren't as fortunate. Every single year, more than 30,000 Americans have their lives cut short by guns (mostly in gun-free zones, but I'll never tell)--30,000. Suicides. Domestic violence. Gang shootouts. Accidents. Hundreds of thousands of Americans have lost brothers and sisters, or buried their own children. (At least my kids are protected from gun violence by my Secret Service.) Many have had to learn to live with a disability, or learned to live without the love of their life.

OBAMABOTS ALL: Sniff, Sniff, head shaking yes, yes, yes.

MR. OBAMA: A number of those people are here today. They can tell you some stories (spin you some yarns, and blame it on the weapons).

The United States of America is not the only country on Earth with violent or dangerous people. (Hell, my people are the most dangerous people.)  We are not inherently more prone to violence. (Heh, heh. Take Iran, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, and Egypt for example.) But we are the only advanced country on Earth that sees this kind of mass violence erupt this this kind of frequency. (That was so smart of Valerie to have me add the word 'advanced.' I should've done it in my first speech.) It doesn't happen in other advanced countries (if you don't count Norway, France, England and Sweden). It's not even close (gee, I hope they didn't hear that as 'snot.') And as I've said before, somehow we've become numb to it and we start thinking that this is normal.

NO MORE--I SHALL END HERE. YOU'RE WELCOME!

There was a moment in the lecture when Obama shed a tear on cue. It was probably the most disgusting political moment of the entire presentation. It takes gun control to get this charlatan president to become emotional. Not the Paris shootings. Not San Bernadino.

No, those events only opened the floor to more talk on gun control, not on the prevention of terrorist acts. That is the go-to position liberals take the moment Islamic terrorists kill civilians. It not a gun control issue we are really dealing with in the big picture. It's radical Muslim terrorist control. 




Tweet

Obama's yadda-yadda speech

In a thankfully short political speech by president Obama at the Pentagon on Monday, our "leader from behind" lectured the American public about how great he is doing against ISIL, and basically explained that we are going to keep on keeping on.

The only new thing to come out of the speech is that Defense Secretary Ash Carter is heading to the Middle East to do something yet unclear.

Mr. Obama (I call him Mr. because he sees himself as a man) hit on the same talking points, saying that we will continue to hunt down ISIL, train others to hunt down ISIL, and hurt them in their pockets by choking them off financially.

Tell that to the Assad regime who buys their oil and whose truck drivers you dropped warning notices to before we bombed them. Great strategy for a community organizer who wants their vote, but I doubt that will stop the flow of ISIS oil to Assad's people.

The speech never addressed the current fears the American public has on the terrorist threat that is now quite obvious after San Bernadino and Paris. 

Obama is tone deaf to the public and doesn't care about our opinions.

Obama claimed about the terror group that "As we squeeze its heart, we'll make it harder for ISIL to pump out its terror and propaganda." That sounds good, but what does it mean beyond that?

He said the "mission to destroy" so far includes 9,000 airstrikes since the bombing began in September 2014. In the spirit of Lt. Col. Ralph Peters, "Over one year of fighting and only 9,000 airstrikes, that's pussy leadership ."

If Obama thinks that he has in any way eased the fears Americans have about ISIS, he's sadly mistaken. The only fears he has eased is our fear that we've been wrong about him being a gutless apologist and sympathizer for Islam.


Tweet

Obama's speech on San Bernadino and why he's a perfect POTUS

President Obama spoke down to the American public on Sunday evening after a fun-filled event previously scheduled for the Kennedy Center Honors celebration held at 5:15 p.m. in the East Room of the White House. His day included at least three wardrobe changes, which makes him a hero in the liberal's book. 

Honored at the event were actress Cicely Tyson, singer and songwriter Carole King, filmmaker George Lucas, and actress and singer Rita Moreno.

After the fun, the Commander in Chief, as he likes to call himself, spoke to the nation from the Oval Office, a room made famous by Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. This is the third "most transparent" president's speech from this office since he began acting as president 7 years ago.

And he had little to add to his strategy on defeating ISIS as he still continues to refer to them as ISIL because he doesn't want to bring Syria to mind.

Let us look at some of his speech and I will add my own comments, or words he left out, in [brackets]:

Good evening. On Wednesday, 14 Americans were killed [by radical Muslims] as they came together to celebrate the holidays [also known as Christmas and Hanukkah]. They were taken [as in killed] from family and friends who loved them deeply. They were white and black, Latino and Asian; immigrants and American-born; moms and dads; daughters and sons. Each of them served their fellow citizens and all of them were part of the American family [unlike many of the personally invited Muslim Brotherhood visitors I have at the White House].

Tonight, I want to talk with you [as in 'at you'] about this tragedy, the broader threat of [radical Islamic] terrorism, and how we can keep our country safe.

The FBI is still gathering the facts [as I tell them to see them] about what happened in San Bernadino, but here is what we know. The victims [infidels] were brutally murdered and injured by one of their [jihadist] coworkers and his [ISIS inspired] wife. So far, we have no evidence [that will leak out] that the killers were directed by a terrorist organization [except for the organization known as orthodox Islam] overseas, or that they were part of a broader conspiracy here at home [unless you consider radical Islam a conspiracy]. But it is clear that the two of them had gone down the dark path of radicalization, [aka became religious and interpreted accurately what is written in the Koran] embracing a [un-] perverted interpretation of Islam that calls for war against [infidels like] America and the West. They had stockpiled assault weapons [which are what all firearms really are] ammunition, and pipe bombs [which are illegal]. So this was an act of [radical Muslim] terrorism, designed to kill innocent [infidel] people.

Our nation has been at war with [Islamic] terrorists since al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 [infidel] Americans on 9/11. In the process, ['process'? He calls killing 3,000 Americans a 'process'?] we've hardened our defenses--from airports to financial centers, to other critical infrastructure. Intelligence [which was crippled by Edward Snowden] and law enforcement agencies [which continues to be crippled by the Obama administration's attitude toward law enforcement and the retaking of military-style equipment they continue to need] have disrupted countless plots here and overseas, and worked around the clock to keep us safe [in spite of Obama]. Our military and counter-terrorism professionals have relentlessly pursued terrorist networks overseas--disrupting safe havens in several different countries, killing Osama bin Laden, [a fact that will live on forever in the ego of someone who wasn't physically responsible for that act] and decimating al Qaeda's leadership [and if you believe that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to discuss with you].

Over the last few years, however, the terrorist threat has evolved into a new phase. As we've become better at preventing complex, multifaceted attacks like 9/11, [which wasn't really complex, but more low-tech] terrorists turned to less complicated acts of violence like the mass shootings that are all too common in our society [in the West, not just the USA, where Obama wants to impose deep restrictions on gun ownership]. It is this type of attack that we saw at Fort Hood in 2009; [which Obama called 'workplace violence.' That is Obama's way of pretending Islam is a religion of peace] in Chattanooga earlier this year; and now in San Bernadino. And as groups like ISIL [which is really ISIS] grew stronger amidst the chaos of war in Iraq and then Syria [due to Obama's lack of leadership and strategy to deal with its growth], and as the Internet erases the distance between countries, we see growing efforts by [Muslim] terrorists to poison the minds of people like the Boston Marathon bombers and the San Bernadino killers [with the literal practice of the Koran].

For seven years, I've confronted this evolving threat each morning in my intelligence briefing [that he hardly attended]. And since the day I took this office, I've authorized U.S. forces to take out terrorists [on dates] abroad precisely because I know how real the danger is [and in spite of that, he has done nothing new to stop it]. As Commander-in-Chief [a term he likes to throw out there just to show the world he has testicles] I have no greater responsibility than the security of the American people [and how's that working out for us so far, Barack?]. As a father of two young daughters who are the most precious part of my life [and who I don't want to ever see burdened with an unwanted baby], I know that we see ourselves with friends and coworkers at a holiday party [which he refuses to call a Christmas party] in San Bernadino. I know we see our kids in the faces of the young people killed in Paris [although the chances of his kids actually being killed with all the guns that protect them is as likely as global warming killing us before ISIS does]. And I know that after so much war, many Americans are asking whether we are confronted by a cancer that has no immediate cure [in spite of the fact that it isn't cancer, it is radical Islam, which the Muslim world is doing very little to assuage the violence. To consistently refuse calling it radical Islamic terrorism, a kind of literal Islam, is to put us in significantly more peril. Calling it a cancer is disingenuous and a false distraction and Obama knows better.]

Well, here's what I want you to know [he said, as if he is teaching children as he looks down at us]: The threat from [Islamic] terrorism is real, but we will overcome it [not defeat it]. We will destroy ISIL {aka ISIS] and any other organization that tries to harm [destroy] us. Our success won't depend on tough talk [especially from Obama who Putin sees as a pussy cat], or abandoning our values, [he means that we ought to turn the other cheek, I suppose] or giving in to fear [what does that even mean 'giving in to fear'?] That's what groups like ISIL [you know, radical Islamic groups] are hoping for. [No, they don't hope for that--they hope to destroy every last infidel on earth--that's what they hope for, Obama]. Instead, we will prevail by being strong and smart, resilient and relentless. and by drawing [cartoons] upon every aspect of American power. [Except military power--no way is Obama going to go there--we might win, or something.]

[And so on.]

He ended his pedantic lip-flapping by saying:

Thank you. God [Allah] bless you, and may God [Allah] bless the United States of America [soon to be the Socialist States of America if we continue to elect Democrats].

It cannot be soon enough to have a Republican in the White House. Let's just hope it's the right Republican.


Tweet

Same O Same O

I believe Obama's speech today was around an hour and 7 minutes long and was probably his best soporific he has given so far. The reason for this is because it was a repeat of his past speeches, but this one sounded worn out and less enthusiastic. And why should Obama have an ounce of enthusiasm left anyway, he's a lame duck with nothing but words to convince the easily convinced liberals that he's a great president, perhaps the greatest of all times. If only the GOP would get out of the way, he could lead this country to prosperity and yadda yadda yadda, George Bush. Okay, to be fair, he didn't mention GW by name, but he probably will next time.

It was entertaining to listen to Austan Goolsbee on Hannity trying to defend Obama's statements about Detroit. He made the claim that he had saved Detroit from bankruptcy then, and obviously was wrong. Goolsbee claimed Obama never said that but was instead referring to the fact that by "Detroit" Obama meant the car industry. Since when does the name of a town translate into a company or group of companies? It was lame and there's no doubt that most people, liberals being the exception, were able to see how he tap danced around Obama's failure.

Obama's 9-11 Speech

Obama spoke tonight and the world has finally let out its collective breath as the president has come up with a speech to solve the jobs problem in this country. Except he didn't.

I'm raising your taxes so who's laughing now

He has said that Americans are tired of waiting for change to come, but nothing he said, wiill "jolt" the stalled economy as he said his "plan" will do. There is no sense of urgency by this president. There is no clear plan, and what he offered has no room for discussion--"take it or leave it," is the attitude.  He feels the jobs plan he proposes should be passed right away. But still, there's no hurry.

Obama apologists still say the same things about the need for bipartisanship, but that only means we need to agree with his plan although it goes against conservative philosophy. 

This was no plan; it was a political speech. His ideas are proven ideas--they are proven not to work. More stimulus? Longer unemployment--even his economic advisor agrees the longer you keep people on unemployment the more likely it is they will not find work. 

And why is he holding back on the public with his "plan"? Because he obviously has no plan. He gives great speeches, and, if you're a liberal, he gives you hope. Hope seems to be the one thing that got him elected, and the one thing that might just keep him in office in 2012 if there are enough gullible liberals who continue to believe his speeches. But it's difficult to really believe that even the average liberal still believes him--he lacks substance. Now we are supposed to wait longer for his deficit plan? What is the rationale for that?


Okay, Obama's idea for tax cuts for middle class households is not a bad thing, but it's like taking an aspirin for leprosy. The tax code needs to be revamped and needs to be competetive with the rest of the world. We need to get rid of those thousands of regulations that choke big business and drive them out of the country. And what about Boeing and the right to work states? Why is he killing off this great American company? Gibson Guitars too--it's political and it stinks. This president stinks and I am glad to be able to live in a country that is free to say that--at least for now.


What do you think about Obama's speech? Sent me a comment and visit my advertisers--I'm a capitalist and a conservative. Thanks.  :=)
                                                                                        
                                                                                         

Tweet