Candidate Who Compared 9/11 To COVID Now Says Murdering Innocents Is Bad

LANSING, MI — Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed released a somber 9/11 video Friday after apparently discovering that crashing planes into buildings and killing thousands of Americans is, in fact, a bad thing.

El-Sayed, who hopes to become the first Muslim U.S. senator, told viewers the country should not forget the victims or the first responders who died. In other words, this America-hating slug would say anything to get elected.

The message marked a sharp change from earlier comments in which he compared 9/11 deaths to COVID and warned about “the rise in white supremacist violence.” 

“A cruel act of terror took the lives of more than 3,000 kids, women, men, including brave first responders who ran into the rubble to save lives that day,” El-Sayed said with a forked tongue in the new video. “Thousands more were injured. Many continue to suffer the consequences even today.”

The video arrived as El-Sayed works to put some distance between himself and a pile of old anti-American positions. He has deleted dozens of posts, including 9/11 comments, calls to defund the police, and arguments against the Second Amendment. 

Thus began more BS: “Today, on 9/11, we honor the lives that were taken from us in a terrible act of terrorism. Nothing can justify the murder of innocent civilians, nothing.  And on this day, we mourn the victims, their families, and the destruction those terrorists caused,” El-Sayed added.

That victim-first tone stood in contrast to posts from recent years that he later deleted. Conservative outlet Townhall archived several of them. 

“Today, I mourn the 3K lives, 6K injuries, & infrastructural devastation in NYC, perpetuated ignorantly in the name of my faith. Tomorrow, I’ll mourn ~1M lives, millions of injuries, & infrastructural devastation in 3 countries, perpetuated ignorantly in the name of my country,” he wrote on September 11, 2021. 

On September 11, 2020, he compared the government’s 9/11 response to the COVID-19 pandemic. “19 yrs ago, 2977 lives were taken from us on 9/11. We mourn them. To avenge their deaths, our country launched harmful wars that took lives,” he wrote. 

“Since the #pandemic, we’ve lost the equivalent of 64 9/11s. That’s one EVERY 3.5 DAYS. Why is there no war on #COVID to SAVE lives?” 

That same day he said he “feared” for his family’s safety for the first time on 9/11 and claimed “white supremacist violence” was “blooming” under President Donald Trump after germinating under President George W. Bush.

After more than 3,000 Americans reportedly died of COVID, El-Sayed posted that more lives had been lost than on 9/11.

“I hope that means we’ll spend the next ten years fighting a war for public health & against climate change & poverty… like we launched a global #WaronTerror after 9/11,” he wrote on X. “We could save lives, rather than take them.” 

Campaign aides said the new message reflects growth, maturity, and a sudden realization that Michigan voters can still read the internet. Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers has spent weeks highlighting El-Sayed’s old rhetoric and his close ties to activist and co-Jew hating Hasan Piker, who once said America “deserved 9/11.”

At press time, El-Sayed was said to be reviewing which remaining posts still needed to vanish before November. He is clearly a disgusting piece of human garbage.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Mass shooter wannabe in GA, stopped by good guy citizens with guns

Jeffrey T. Kinzer

A Georgia man is sitting in jail after allegedly deciding that the proper response to a verbal argument at a family reunion was to come back dressed like he was auditioning for a low-budget militia movie and start shooting at people.

According to authorities in Lee County, deputies responded to reports of a shooting around 9:00 p.m. on Sunday, June 7. When they arrived, they found a “large gathering” and one individual suffering from a gunshot wound who was transported to a local hospital.

From the Lee County Sheriff's Office Facebook page:

“During the investigation, deputies interviewed multiple witnesses, reviewed security camera footage, and gathered physical evidence from the scene. Witnesses reported that Jeffrey Tyler Kinzer had been involved in a verbal confrontation with individuals attending a large gathering in the area. Witnesses further reported that Kinzer later returned on foot carrying an AR-style rifle and wearing body armor. Witnesses stated that Kinzer fired toward the gathering, and multiple individuals returned fire toward his location.”

Now, if you've been paying attention to the media for the last several years, you already know how this usually works. If the bad guy has a gun and innocent people are helpless victims, CNN clears the schedule, MSNBC breaks out the crying panelists, and every blue-check activist on social media starts demanding that your grandfather's squirrel rifle be outlawed by lunchtime.

But this story has one inconvenient detail the anti-gun crowd really hates: armed citizens fought back.

The “large gathering” was reportedly a family reunion, and according to witnesses, the whole thing started when Kinzer allegedly drove by yelling racial slurs.

“He’s talking junk. He started yelling the ‘N-word,’” witness Ramell Green said. “He kept going, so we let him go. We just discussed what had happened after.”

Reasonable people would probably leave it there. Allegedly, Kinzer decided to escalate things dramatically.

The homeowner said she called the Lee County Sheriff’s Office after Kinzer first left the area. About five minutes later, Kinzer and the driver reportedly returned.

Only this time, according to witnesses, Kinzer showed up wearing body armor and carrying an AR-15-style rifle.

That tends to change the mood of a family barbecue pretty quickly.

Those outside spotted him from a distance and started running for cover before shots were fired.

“...People started taking positions because they saw he had a gun. And I was in the middle of the street,” Green said. “And I grabbed my gun and started returning fire and moving with him.”

This is what regular citizens sometimes have to do when evil shows up uninvited and heavily armed.

Green said there were roughly 20 relatives outside at the time, and he was trying to protect his family members from getting slaughtered. Which, judging by the details released so far, may very well be exactly what happened.

Kinzer, referred to as 36 or 41 years old in reports, was apparently wounded during the exchange, though not seriously enough to prevent him from being treated, released, and booked into the Lee County Jail afterward. He was released on $5,000 bond the next day.

And here's where things get especially interesting.

The sheriff’s office said Kinzer “acknowledged to deputies that he had been involved in the shooting.” Authorities also indicated he wasn’t alone when he returned to the gathering, though so far he appears to be the only person arrested.

There are still major unanswered questions about the incident, including whether Kinzer bonded out and what exactly motivated him to allegedly launch what sure looks like a racially charged attack on a family gathering.

But based on the initial reports, one thing seems pretty obvious: armed family members returning fire likely prevented a far worse tragedy. Thank heaven for the Second Amendment. Which may also explain why this story hasn’t exactly become the media obsession of the week.

Think about it. If this had ended with multiple dead victims and nobody fighting back, we’d probably still be getting wall-to-wall coverage complete with dramatic music, emotional town halls, and demands for sweeping gun control legislation. Politicians would already be standing at podiums insisting that law-abiding Americans need fewer rights because a violent lunatic exists.

Instead, the story involves legally armed citizens protecting their families and stopping an alleged attacker before the body count climbed.

Funny how quickly the national press loses interest when the facts ruin the narrative.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Virginia Prosecutor Tells Gun Ban To Pound Sand, Reminds Everyone The Second Amendment Is Still A Thing

Ryan Mehaffey, a U.S. Marine Corps veteran and Virginia prosecutor, is taking a hard-line stance against what is an "unconstitutional" new gun ban signed by far-left Democratic Gov. Abigail Spanberger.

Comrade Spanberger, who has been slipping in the polls amid criticisms of her socialist/progressive policy agenda, signed a new bill last week banning the future sale and manufacture of "assault weapons," including many semiautomatic rifles, pistols and shotguns. The law also bans the future sale of magazines with a capacity of more than 15 rounds, because she thinks people don't carry more than one magazine nor know how to reload.

The move caused immediate backlash from many Virginians and raised new Second Amendment violation concerns. Rather than protest, however, Mehaffey, who serves as the commonwealth attorney for Spotsylvania County, is drawing a line in the sand and flatly refusing to enforce the ban.

With the bill set to take effect this July ahead of America’s 250th anniversary of independence, Mehaffey sent a letter to Spotsylvania Sheriff Roger Harris, instructing him that the ban is "unconstitutional and cannot be lawfully enforced."

Virginia Democrat Gov. Abigail Spanberger is drawing Republicans' ire and a potential Justice Department lawsuit on her latest moves against the Second Amendment. I would say that she needs to be removed from office, but I won't.

A statement released by Spanberger’s office called the assault weapons ban a "critical step toward protecting families, communities, and the law enforcement officers who serve them." It also puts miscreants who would terrorize or otherwise commit crimes with firearms at a distinct advantage over those of us who want self-defense protection of our homes and businesses. But worse, it goes against the U.S, Constitution and is totally illegal.

Spanberger remarked she signed the bill into law "because firearms designed to inflict maximum casualties do not belong on our streets." She forgot to mention how firearms can prevent or minimize casualties by the time law enforcement arrives. 

These are the same dolts who talk about 'gun violence' as if the gun operates on its own.

The leftist governor added that "while the General Assembly chose not to adopt my amendment that specifically carves out certain firearms frequently used for hunting, I will work with the patrons to clarify this language."

In response, Mehaffey said in an interview with Fox News Digital that the law "is striking at the core of the militia system that existed in Virginia."

According to Mehaffey, the Second Amendment is not just an assurance of personal freedoms, but also a safeguard for a community’s ability to defend itself through a 'well-regulated militia.'

"Our founders were careful to make sure when they drafted our founding document, that the ultimate right of the people was preserved to defend themselves and to defend their community," he explained. "So, the linchpin of the constitutional analysis is going to be does this instrument have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a regulated militia."

Mehaffey argues that Virginia historical tradition and legal precedent requires citizens own firearms for the public defense, saying, "The second amendment may not mean that you are allowed to have a nuclear weapon, but what it does allow you to have is a basic infantry weapon."

Mehaffey argues that in Virginia, historical tradition and case law precedent not only allow citizens to own firearms but even require them to arm themselves with the weapons of a basic infantryman for common defense. In the Founding Fathers’ time, Mehaffey said the standard issue was a musket and 20 rounds. Today, the basic infantry weapon in the U.S. military is the M4A1 carbine equipped with a 30-round magazine. And let's not leave out the idea that extra magazines are provided to our war fighters.

Comrade Abigail Spanberger

"The second amendment may not mean that you are allowed to have a nuclear weapon," he laughed. "But what it does allow you to have is a basic infantry weapon."

"That sort of weapon is the core of what's protected by the Second Amendment. Not necessarily a nuclear warhead, but a rifle that you can take out and form either a fire team or a company to defend yourself and to defend your community."

Spoken like a true 'grunt'.

Mehaffey is not alone in his stance. In addition to what he characterized as the "overwhelmingly positive" response from his community, Smyth County Commonwealth’s Attorney Phillip Blevins, an Air Force veteran, has also refused to enforce the bill, arguing it is unconstitutional. The ban is also facing lawsuits from gun-rights groups, including the NRA, Firearms Policy Coalition and Second Amendment Foundation.

Blevins told Fox News Digital that "ultimately, courts will continue to address these issues, and I respect the role of the judiciary. But as the elected Commonwealth’s Attorney for Smyth County, I will continue to stand for what I believe the Constitution requires, without apology or hesitation.""My position is not based on politics. It is based on constitutional fidelity," he continued, adding, "The Bill of Rights either means something, or it does not."

"As Commonwealth’s Attorney, I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of Virginia. That oath is not situational, and it does not change based on politics, headlines, or pressure from either side of an issue."

Mehaffey believes he and those standing beside him on this issue will ultimately prevail."The Second Amendment is the supreme law of the land, both in the U.S. Constitution and the analog in the Virginia Constitution," he explained. "So, whatever law is passed by the General Assembly is not going to have the ability to supersede the Constitution."

While he has gotten a lot of personal attention for his stance, Mehaffey emphasized that, "I want nothing more than to fulfill my office with honor and to be a good servant to the people that elected me to represent them and to stick up for their rights."

"That's what I'm trying to do," he continued, adding, "I would expect any government official to remain faithful to the Constitution and to discharge their duties as servants of the people in the same way that I have."

In other news, Spanberger's office is reportedly working on a follow-up bill that would ban pointy sticks, stones, and angry words, just to be safe.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Teen hero murdered in the Bronx by teens with guns

A tragic and utterly senseless shooting [aren't they all] in the Bronx has left a 16-year-old aspiring football star dead after he heroically stepped in to shield his friends from a group of illegally armed thugs, yet another grim chapter in the borough's spiraling youth violence epidemic that has residents fed up and demanding real action from city leaders, including their communist mayor.

Christopher Redding, a talented player on the John F. Kennedy High School tackle football team and the Fastbreak flag football squad (with prior stints on the Bronx Colts and LBX teams), paid the ultimate price for his courage. 

According to a GoFundMe page set up by his coach, "Christopher was defending his friends who were being targeted by a group of individuals who then opened fire on them in the Bronx. His last act on earth was one of courage and selflessness, protecting those he cared about."

The chaos unfolded last Wednesday after school dismissal near a bus stop in Kingsbridge, where crowds of teens had gathered. What started as a street dispute quickly escalated, because, as Bronx Borough President Vanessa Gibson bluntly put it, "This started out as some sort of fight on the street, and it escalated. And, guess what, someone had a gun. That is usually the issue." Gibson added that there's been "too much violence among young adults." But just how much is too much?

Police say four suspects, three males and one female, were involved. It's not yet known if these thugs identify correctly according to their actual gender.

The NYPD released footage of the group, and on Saturday, authorities nabbed a 17-year-old male connected to the incident. He's now staring down a laundry list of serious charges: murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, assault, and criminal possession of a loaded firearm. Two other young victims, a 15-year-old boy and a 13-year-old girl, were shot in the right leg and are stable in the hospital. 

Local resident Regina Hall witnessed the panic from her window: after five gunshots rang out, she saw "hundreds and hundreds of kids" waiting for the bus scatter in terror. "You can't come to the stores," she told reporters. "I had a friend that went to the drug store, and she had to try to run from across the street there to here to get to her house." She described regular teen brawls spilling into the streets and noted the noticeable drop in police presence thanks to Mayor Mamdani: "I used to see a lot of policemen around here. But it's, you know, can't say anymore." 

The community is reeling, and frustration is boiling over toward city leadership. Redding's grieving father, Bryan Corley spoke to the New York Post about the remaining suspects still on the loose: "They're still out there, and nothing is really being done. Mayor Mamdani saying that the police is doing a good job. They're not doing a good job. It's disgusting." 

When asked if Mamdani's office had even reached out to the family, he said simply: "no." For his part, Comrade Mamdani addressed the recent Bronx shootings last Thursday, calling them "heartbreaking and horrific" and adding, "I am thankful for the work of the NYPD not only in responding to them but also in the actions they are taking to ensure that we work to prevent them in the future."

District Council Member Eric Dinowitz struck a more urgent tone on X: "guns in the hands of high school students should never be the reality, and we must put an end to this senseless violence." He added that with a new mayoral administration, "we have an opportunity to address this crisis once and for all. My colleagues and I in the City Council will do everything we can to support an anti-gun violence agenda that addresses the root causes and saves lives."

He failed to mention how this would be addressed in terms of getting illegal guns off the streets. It isn't as though criminals are going to give up their guns, and gun laws seem to only apply to law abiding citizens.

Gibson echoed the sentiment, noting the borough has seen a troubling rise in gun violence [as if it's the guns that are violent, not the shooters] that has "leaving too many of our families and community members feeling unsafe in their own neighborhoods."

If you enjoy  Brain Flushings and would like to subscribe or Buy Me a Coffee, or even check out the sponsors on this page, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work and my coffee drinking habit. No pressure and subscribing is free. So is checking out the advertisers on the blog.

This isn't just another statistic, it's a heartbreaking loss of a promising young life cut short in an avoidable explosion of street-level stupidity and easy access to firearms among the youth. 

The guns don't commit the violence and the problem isn't just with access to them. The problem starts at home where, for example, missing fathers have no influence on their sons and daughters. The problem is primarily a social problem where cops are vilified and guns are glorified.

Tweet

Tulsi Gabbard exposes Biden's secret program to quiet conservatives

They thought they could bury it forever, locked away in a vault of secrecy and bureaucratic jargon. The Biden administration’s blueprint for dismantling American freedom was meant to stay hidden, shielded from the eyes of a public they claimed to serve.

But they didn’t see Tulsi Gabbard coming.

In a bombshell move that’s got the DC swamp in a frenzy, Director of National Intelligence Gabbard just ripped the crap-stained sheets off the Biden era’s most chilling and wordy document: the so-called “Strategic Implementation Plan for Countering Domestic Terrorism.”

“As promised, I have declassified the Biden Administration’s Strategic Implementation Plan for Countering Domestic Terrorism. Read it here: https://t.co/VAXDHkgZTK https://t.co/oNXjKDqamc” — DNI Tulsi Gabbard (
@DNIGabbard) April 16, 2025

Let’s strip away the Orwellian doublespeak. This isn’t a “plan to counter terrorism”—it’s a straight-up playbook for targeting conservatives. While Biden droned on about “unity,” his team was weaponizing Big Tech to silence dissent and building a surveillance state to track Americans with the “wrong” opinions. To his credit, Biden was likely not aware of what his handler[s] was doing because he wasn't aware of most everything beyond ice cream and hair.

The document’s a progressive fever dream: monitor “suspicious” online speech (read: anything right of AOC), bloat federal watchlists with conservatives, and—surprise—find fresh ways to gut the Second Amendment.

Don’t buy the “protecting democracy” hogwash. The Government Accountability Office confirms this wasn’t just talk—it was in motion. How many patriots got labeled “threats” for posting a MAGA meme or questioning an election?

They even slapped Tulsi Gabbard on the TSA’s terrorist watchlist. That’s the Left's America for you.

The plan’s biggest issue? A push for red flag laws and gun restrictions, cloaked as preventing “lethal means.” In their world, owning a firearm or loving the Constitution makes you a “domestic terrorist.”
The SIP ordered agencies to hunt down “DT-related content” online, cozying up with Big Tech to monitor, flag, and erase speech that didn’t toe the progressive line. First Amendment? What’s that?

The Twitter Files already exposed this game—government goons leaning on tech giants to smother dissent on COVID, elections, you name it. The report brags about agencies sharing “relevant information on DT-related and associated transnational terrorist online content” with private companies.

 
This wasn’t a misstep—it was a deliberate attack on the liberties that define America. While the left shrieked about “democracy under threat,” they were laying the groundwork for tyranny.

Gabbard’s declassification is a gut punch to the establishment, exposing what Biden’s “moderate” crew was cooking up in the shadows. Now we’re left wondering: what else is lurking in those classified files?
The founders would be spitting mad. But maybe this is the wake-up call America needs—a reminder of what happens when we let power-drunk bureaucrats run wild, far from the sunlight of accountability.

Next time you hear a Democrat preaching about “saving democracy,” remember this plan. Their version of “democracy” is a far cry from the Republic our founders bled for.

And know that Tulsi Gabbard has bigger balls than Biden and his handler[s], figuratively speaking, of course.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine! No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

March for our Lives is dying slowly

Perpetually angry at something gun related

There’s a certain absurdity baked into the gun control movement, a kind of tragicomic repetition that would make even Sisyphus wince. Everyone on that side of the debate seems compelled to start their own little outfit, each one parroting the same tired lines as the last, as if the sheer volume of organizations might somehow drown out the Second Amendment.

March for Our Lives at least had the decency to carve out a niche, focusing on America’s youth—a group typically more preoccupied with their phones than with policy. Born from the blood and anguish of Parkland, spearheaded by survivors who turned trauma into a megaphone, it burst onto the scene with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer. Money flowed in, headlines followed, and for a moment, it looked like they might actually shift the tectonic plates of American gun culture.

But apparently not enough money flowed in to keep the lights on, as the group has just sacked most of its full-time staff—a pruning so severe it’s less a trim and more a clear-cut.

March For Our Lives is slashing its employees and anointing a new leader. Last week, the gun-control crusaders announced they’d be parting ways with 13 of their 16 full-time staffers—leaving a rump outfit that could barely man a picket line, let alone a movement. They’ve also tapped Jaclyn Corin, a 24-year-old Parkland survivor and co-founder, as their new executive director, thrusting her into the unenviable role of captaining a ship that’s sprung more leaks than a pair of Biden's 3-week-old skivvies.

“We are facing financial challenges as an organization, not unlike many nonprofit advocacy organizations in this time,” Corin told The 19th, with the sort of measured resignation you’d expect from someone watching their dreams sink into the quicksand of reality. “I am sure things would look differently with a different outcome of the election, but these are the systems and circumstances in which we have to make adjustments based on the financial situation we find ourselves in. It is incredibly unfortunate that these cuts have to happen.”

This isn’t just a stumble—it’s a face-plant for one of America’s loudest anti-gun voices. With the midterms looming, their ability to influence anything beyond a Twitter thread is now in serious doubt. It’s the culmination of a slow, pitiful decline from the dizzying heights of their early days—a fall from grace that’s been as predictable as it is painful to watch.

When I first saw the headline and dug into the piece, my mind went straight to DOGE—the Musk-Trump efficiency juggernaut—taking a flamethrower to the NGO gravy train. The money wasn’t meant to go directly to gun control groups, of course, but we all know the game: it gets funneled through pass-through entities, those clever little NGOs that scoop up USAID cash and sprinkle it onto anti-gun campaigns like confetti at a protest. With that spigot now largely shut off, I suspect we’re witnessing the first tremors of a broader reckoning for these outfits.

That said, I wouldn’t pin it all on DOGE’s budget axe. March For Our Lives was showing signs of distress before Trump swaggered back into the Oval Office and Musk started slashing government waste with the zeal of a man who’d rather be colonizing Mars. The rot, it seems, was already setting in.
The numbers tell a grim tale. Public records show fundraising at its two nonprofit arms has cratered. The non-political foundation went from $2.2 million in 2022 to $1.4 million in 2023, landing more than $300,000 in the red—a shortfall that’s less a hiccup and more a financial coronary. Its political advocacy wing fared worse, plunging from $7 million in 2022 to under $3.5 million the next year. Both bled deficits, and neither came close to the $18.6 million war chest they amassed in 2018’s heady days.

We don’t have 2024’s figures yet, but Corin’s comments suggest the bleeding hasn’t stopped—it’s just gotten messier. She admits they overreached, took on more than they could sustain, and watched the cash evaporate.

Michael Bloomberg could’ve plugged the gap with the loose change from his Mayfair townhouse, but he didn’t. I’d wager the laid-off staffers are mulling that over as they draft their CVs.

What we’re seeing here is a classic case of hubris meeting reality. They rode a tsunami of donations in 2018, assumed the well would never run dry, and built their operation on the shaky premise that the cheques would keep coming. They didn’t. Inflation bit, ordinary Americans tightened their belts, and even the deep-pocketed donors got stingier—perhaps tiring of a cause that’s starting to feel like a broken record.

Rather than adapt, they clung to optimism, hoping the tide would turn. It didn’t, and now they’re binning over 80 percent of their full-time staff—including, presumably, the very people tasked with shaking the money tree. A bold strategy, if your goal is to accelerate your own irrelevance.

March for Our Lives stormed in with righteous fury and a fat bankroll, but it’s limping out as a cautionary tale: even the loudest voices fade when the cash runs dry. They wanted to change America. Instead, they’ve just reminded us that idealism, unchecked by pragmatism, ends up as little more than ash.

"Hey, if you’re enjoying this blog as much as I enjoy writing it, feel free to fuel my caffeine addiction over at Buy Me a Coffee – no pressure, just good vibes!"

Tweet

"Hunters & Anglers coalition for Harris"

Tim "Elmer Fudd" Walz: a make-believe man on a make-believe hunt
with an unloaded gun

Vice President Harris has a history of pushing for what she calls "reasonable gun safety laws," which actually exist but she and her vegetative boss pretend that they don't. We already have background checks but she wants to go a step further and call for red flag laws, which allow your neighbor to turn you in and have your weapon seized under claims that you're not a responsible gun-owner, and an "assault weapons" ban, which generally consist of scary looking guns, or at least guns that scare the crap out of liberals and progressives.

Worse, Harris has voiced support for ending immunity from liability for gun manufacturers, which means they can be held liable for some idiot school shooter, for example, for the way he or she used the gun. This is really no different than holding car manufacturers liable for drunk drivers who kill others.

Part of the reason she feels this way about guns and policies to deal with them, is due to the fact that she's a moron.

If Harris and Tampon Tim win the election next month, they will do what they can to cancel the Second Amendment and remove guns from law abiding Americans. I doubt they will succeed, but one can imagine tighter restrictions will apply.

However, it's no secret that the dynamic clown duo want us to believe they support the right to own firearms, and even tell us they both own guns. I can believe Harris might own a handgun, but after seeing Walz handle his shotgun in the style of the Secret Service woman who couldn't put hers back in its holster, I suspect even if he owns one, it's just for show.

And here's another thing for show:

The Hunters and Anglers for Harris-Walz coalition is launching to mobilize conservationists, rural Americans, and responsible gun owners. We proudly support Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, both gun owners who stand for gun safety. 🎉https://t.co/kctF0v2L9t— Brady | United Against Gun Violence (@bradybuzz)

People who hunt and fish, the so-called boots on the ground hunters and the actual sport fishermen and women, probably never heard of The Hunters and Anglers for Harris-Walz coalition; they're too busy hunting and fishing. If they have an inkling of the policies that Harris would like to impose upon them, based on her history, they might lock, unload, reel in their lines and vote for Trump/Vance.

It's obvious Kamala Harris would do anything to advance her political career, again, as based on her history with Willie Brown and also for labeling Biden a "racist" and chalking her lie up to the fact that it was a debate. Now she's gaslighting us with her new-found support of the Second Amendment.

As one X post put it:

I guess gun ownership isn't as dangerous as you claimed https://t.co/YYq7BqGXQ3 pic.twitter.com/niKaPOP7uY— Rob Romano (@2Aupdates) October 18, 2024

The Democrats are desperate and will say/do anything to win. The lie is their oxygen. Hunters and Anglers for Harris-Walz is a dog that doesn't hunt.

Walz may say that he's a hunter, which is about as true as him being an Iraq war hero.

Tweet

Two armed robbers shot by target

San Antonio, TEXAS -- The San Antonio Police Department is investigating a shooting in which two men were rushed to the hospital at about 3:50 a.m. Sunday morning from the 200 block of Ranch Valley.

When officers arrived at the scene, they discovered a 23-year-old man with a gunshot wound to his head. Emergency Medical Services transported him to the hospital, where he was listed in critical condition, according to the San Antonio Police Department. During the investigation, authorities learned that another man had also been taken to the hospital, this one with a gunshot wound to his hip, which was linked to the same incident, SAPD reported.

Per San Antonio police, the two men taken to the hospital were the aggressors, while the person who shot them was the target of an attempted robbery and acting in self-defense.

Police have not disclosed many additional details about the defensive gun use, only confirming that the two men who targeted the 34-year-old armed citizen were also armed. The victim is not currently facing any charges for his actions, and based on what we know, nor should he.

There were other self-defense incidents this weekend but you get the picture: people have the right to defend themselves and their property and the Second Amendment is as important as the First Amendment and the U.S. Constitution overall.

Tweet

New study from Duke University finds gun control laws have no impact on homicide rates

I'm sorry to have to tell you gun grabbing leftists [just kidding, I'm not sorry] but a new study by the Duke University School of Medicine [aka Club Med] performed a study that found gun control laws have zero impact on homicide rates. Zilch. Zero. Nada.

This longitudinal study considered both suicide and homicide rates involving children below the age of 18 between the years 2009 through 2020. Mortality data provided by the CDC was used and a database of state-level firearm laws maintained by the Rand Corporation. Thirty-six gun control laws were examined to show the impact.

The laws included background checks, mandatory waiting periods, "stand your ground" laws, safe storage provisions, and the left's favorite, Red Flag laws where Big Brother can be your neighbor.

In the 12-year period of the study, there were 6,735 suicides and 10,278 homicides reported that involved a firearm.

The authors stated that they examined “suicide deaths by all firearms, including intentional self-harm by handguns only, intentional self-harm by rifles, shotguns, or large firearms only, and intentional self-harm by other or unspecified firearms, as well as homicide deaths for the same firearm types in each state.”

They did not use accidental deaths by firearms because there are myriad ways to die by accidents that have nothing to do with firearms.

What they found was that there was a small difference made regarding mandatory storage laws of firearms as it impacts on suicides. Evidently, it gives the person a modicum of time to possibly change their mind and go on living. But perhaps better education and tax incentives for gun safes would have gotten the same good results.

The reason that homicide rates were not affected is because the large majority of guns used in crimes of any kind are obtained illegally or are bought by people with no criminal record who would not be prevented from purchasing a firearm, just like they would not be denied purchasing a razor blade to slit their wrist, or a car to "do a Thelma and Louise."

There has not been one case that I can recall where stricter gun laws would have prevented a shooting.

So more gun control, even buy-backs [aka: gun confiscation] would not put a dent in homicides and suicides.

If people are so concerned about people dying before their time, perhaps they should consider the abortion explosion in the country, which has dramatically increased after Roe v. Wade was ended.

Tweet

NM Gov. gets her comeuppance on gun-ban move

New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-of course) seems to believe that she has the authority to ban law abiding citizens from being allowed to carry guns in Albuquerque and the surrounding county for the next 30 days or more.

The far-left governor signed an executive order Thursday stating that gun violence is a public health emergency, implying that her definition of health is twisted. While health is the state of being free from illness or injury, the gun "health emergency" is more of a societal problem which the left refuses to address.

On Friday, Grisham used her political position to suspend open and concealed carry laws in Albuquerque and the surrounding area and threatened to lengthen or renew her unconstitutional order.

Although she basically agreed that her order might be unconstitutional and she might lose in court, she went ahead and became New Mexico's first dictator.

Her decision was so crazy that even far, far-left anti-gun activist David Hogg criticized her.

“I support gun safety but there is no such thing as a state public health emergency exception to the U.S. Constitution,” Hogg posted on X.

I support gun safety but there is no such thing as a state public health emergency exception to the U.S. Constitution. https://t.co/6GfbOZLc7g

Even far, far-leftist and anti-intelligence Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) had negative words about Grisham's executive order, causing many Republicans to experience the vapors upon hearing his words of reason:

“I support gun safety laws. However, this order from the Governor of New Mexico violates the U.S. Constitution,” Lieu wrote on X. “No state in the union can suspend the federal Constitution. There is no such thing as a state public health emergency exception to the U.S. Constitution.”

New Mexico GOP state Reps. Stefani Lord and John Block on Saturday said that they were going forward to impeach Grisham.

“I am calling on counsel to begin the impeachment process against Governor Grisham,” Lord said. “This is an abhorrent attempt at imposing a radical, progressive agenda on an unwilling populous. Rather than addressing crime at its core, Governor Grisham is restricting the rights of law-abiding gun owners. Even Grisham believes this emergency order won’t prohibit criminals from carrying or using weapons; a basic admission that this will only put New Mexicans in danger as they won’t be able to defend themselves from violent crime.”

Block said that there was “no such thing as a state public health emergency exception to the U.S. Constitution.”

And what makes anyone on the left really believe that if you take the rights of law abiding individuals to defend themselves, that lawless miscreants would go along with the gun ban? All it serves to do is leave the good people of Albuquerque defenseless.

Elon Musk responded on his X platform to Grisham’s order posting: 

At risk of stating what should be obvious, deliberately violating the Constitution is next-level illegal.

How soon can this person be removed from office?

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 9, 2023

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) responded, “She’s nuts, but she’s taking what the tyrants did during COVID (forced jabs, travel bans, closed businesses, suppressed speech — with no laws passed) to the next level.”

She's also doing what the Nazis did to the public by taking away their means of self-defense against a tyrannical government. Who does she think she is anyway? Gretchen Whitmer?

Tweet

MT gun owner raided by Biden's ATF, IRS to harass and intimidate:report

Highwood Creek Outfitters gun shop in Great Fall, MT, was raided by the IRS and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Wednesday because the IRS doesn't just collect taxes anymore--they have guns and are learning how to use them.

In a letter to IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel and ATF Director Steven M. Dettelbach, Rep. Mathew M. Rosendale Sr. (R-MT) said, "This event is another example of President Biden weaponizing federal agencies to target and harass hard-working Americans for exercising their constitutional rights."

Gee, ya think?

"While we wait to hear more details and the rationale behind this raid, given the positions of the Biden Administration this raid appears to be an attempt to intimidate firearms dealers and owners," the letter stated. "A pattern of intimidation and harassment seems to be emerging under Director Dettelbach’s leadership of the ATF."

"This pattern appears to be orchestrated directly from the White House as evident by the 'fact sheet' released by the Biden Administration, where they detail their plans to hassle mom-and-pop gun shops over minor record keeping and paperwork discrepancies," the letter added.

Rosendale noted that the IRS grabbed all 4473 background check questionnaires, which have absolutely no useful tax data as they "include no financial information, and there is no discernible reason why the IRS would need these forms."

Other than to track who has guns so they can use the information at a later date when our dictator needs it for confiscation purposes.

"The IRS committed an egregious breach of privacy for Montana’s gun owners," Resendale Jr. continued. "Although there are still some murky details regarding the events at Highwood Creek Outfitters. There is no circumstance in which 4473’s would be necessary in an investigation spearheaded by the IRS."

But that isn't the point. This administration is slowly attempting to gain more power.

The owner of Highwood Creek Outfitters Tom Van Hoose said in an interview with MTN News that he has been the subject of government surveillance for a couple of years, and he doesn't know the reason why but fears it's political.

Tweet

Notice how the left left out talking about shooter's AR-15 and gun banning? Here's why.

The nation is aware of the horrific mass shooting in Cleveland, Texas on Friday night in which five people were slaughtered, including an 8-year-old boy.

The alleged shooter, Francisco Oropesa, executed his neighbors for asking him to not fire his AR-15 so close to their neighboring home because they had company and the noise was quite loud. So Oropesa followed the man who complained to his door and then began killing the family, one-by-one.

Two of the women killed — Diana Velazquez Alvarado and Julisa Molina Rivera — were murdered as they lay atop three children, trying to protect them. They also hid a two-month-old baby under clothing to hide it from Oropesa. These incredible women, three in all, died protecting their young and now leave behind six children. 

It is already Monday as this is being written, and thus far, Oropesa is still on the loose. The police have in their possession the weapon he used but have "zero leads" regarding his whereabouts. He remains a danger to the public and there is an $80,000 reward for anyone providing information that leads to his arrest.

So why hasn't the progressives gone into their reflex mode of talking about gun control and the evils of scary guns? It's like a knee-jerk reaction but now all we get from them is crickets and swamp gas.

Well, not only is Oropesa a Mexican national, it has been confirmed that he is also an illegal alien and, wait for it . . . has been deported no less than five (5) times between 2009 and 2016. But like that ugly rash on Hunter Biden's testicles, he keeps coming back, as confirmed by Fox News' Bill Melugin:

NEW: Per ICE source, Francisco Oropesa, the Mexican national who police say fatally shot 5 of his neighbors in TX, is in the U.S. illegally. I’m told he’s been previously deported, has “multiple” illegal re-entries on his record, and was last encountered by ICE in 2016. pic.twitter.com/JX40Pj0mc7

— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) April 30, 2023


NEW: Per a second DHS source, Oropesa was deported five times between 2009-2016.

— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) April 30, 2023

The left is not going to keep this story in front of the public because the bigger story isn't the gun, it's the person who used it. But that's always the story and the left refuses to agree to that fact.

The border is a sieve and that's exactly the way this crappy, incompetent administration wants it to be because they want power and know these illegal aliens will give it to them in the future, Insofar as law enforcement and penalties for criminal actions, the Biden administration doesn't seem to care, unless it's white on non-white crime.

And while the left cries about gun control and laws, it was already against the law for this scumbag to have a firearm of any kind, and he wasn't even supposed to be in the country. So who do they blame? Trump, of course. It's verbal calisthenics.

Department of Homeland Security waste Alejandro Mayorkas wouldn’t even answer the question of whether or not the killer was an illegal alien when asked by host Chuck Todd of “Meet the Press.” 

Biden DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas says he can't comment on if the Texas man who murdered five of his neighbors execution-style and fled the scene is in the country illegally pic.twitter.com/UsjWhPMRou

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) April 30, 2023

The cover up by these elites is a clown car speeding downhill with innocent people at the bottom. Todd even suggested that Oropesa having a "consulate card" makes his presence in the United States legal. He is either an idiot or a liar, but admittedly, two things can be true at the same time.

Tweet

FL robbery suspect running from cops shot 8 times by good guy with a gun: "Swift end to dirt-bag's crime spree"

A robbery suspect who, if Barack Obama had a son would look like him, led Florida police on a reckless high-speed chase.

The suspect got out of the vehicle he was in and attempted to carjack a convenience store clerk who fortunately was armed. He shot the alleged scumbag eight times and ended the alleged miscreants alleged crime career.

The Flagler County Sheriff's Office said in a Facebook post, that Qwinntavus Kwame Jordan walked into a Shell gas station in Flagler Beach and "alluded to having a firearm" which allowed him to walk out of the store with $90 in cash.

Police located Jordan’s car on I-95 and began pursuing him until reaching the Florida-Georgia line where authorities in Georgia took over the chase and spike stripped Jordan’s car at which point he began fleeing on foot.

According to the Facebook post, Jordan then "entered a nearby convenience store, brandished a firearm, and demanded the clerk’s car keys."

Jordan got into the vehicle and started to flee but crashed the vehicle through the front of the store and then "exited the vehicle and chased the clerk and a customer through the store and a struggle ensued."

"The clerk, who was now armed, shot the suspect approximately 8 times according to Georgia authorities," police said.

Jordan was arrested and taken to the hospital where he was said to be in critical condition because 8 bullets in one body is a lot to deal with.

Police say the investigation is ongoing and that the suspect was a fugitive wanted for armed robbery in Georgia at the time of his arrest.

"I commend our Real Time Crime Center team for quickly developing suspect information and his vehicle and thank all the agencies that assisted in apprehending this armed and dangerous fugitive," Flagler County Sheriff Rick Staly said in the press release.

"I also commend the Georgia store clerk that put a swift end to this dirt-bag's crime spree. If he survives his injuries, he should spend a long time in prison."

Alleged crime doesn't pay in the end.

Tweet

Why did the Nashville school shooter target the Covenant School? What we know

Not everything gets reported in the news, especially when it bodes poorly for the Left's agenda. The recent, horrible Christian school mass shooting in Nashville is no exception. What's worse, the media madee the female killer, who identified as a transgender man, the victim in the story; not the three children and three adults who were slaughtered by her.

Nashville City Council Member Robert Swope spoke to the NY Post and provided them with some important information. Specifically, although police haven't yet released information regarding the domestic terrorist's motive, they could say that the three 9 year olds and the three adults were not targeted, but the school was the target of the killing.

Swope told the outlet that Hale had “looked at” two other schools, both public, before deciding “the security was too great to do what she wanted to do.” 

“So she chose a private Christian school, for, probably the reason is that the security is a whole lot less,” he went on.

In other words, it was gun-free, and probably had no bag inspection x-ray equipment to inspect backpacks and the like.

Swope was now convinced that the community needed to “harden [our] schools from ballistics, active AI systems that can recognize guns at a hundred yards outside under any circumstances.” He said he and other Nashville officials were looking into how they could do that.

Basically, Swope said the same thing the Nashville Police Chief John Drake had previously said and that the left-leaning media glossed over. In Chief Drake's case, he also included shopping malls and other soft target locations.

“We strongly believe there was going to be some other targets, including maybe family members, and one of the malls here in Nashville,” Drake said. “And that just did not happen.”

So why didn’t the shooter hit the other location that she was considering?

Nashville Police Chief: "There was another location that was mentioned, but because of a threat assessment by the suspect of too much security, they decided not to," pic.twitter.com/5cZ1TcfJwv

— Rob (@_ROB_29) March 29, 2023

You might notice that Drake used the pronoun 'they' in his comment so as not to offend the sensitivities of the LGBTQ+1%~67! community. The shooter was a female, not a 'they.'

So the shooter planned carefully and saw that other locations had security measures in place so she decided to go to a gun-free [soft target] zone, a school she had attended knowing it would have no opposition. Fortunately, the school was in Nashville, not Uvalde, so the police showed what bravery was all about and killed her before she could kill anyone else.

But the targeting of the school was clear but the media wanted you to think it was due to it being a Christian school and therefore anti-LGBTQ+1%~67! which it is not. The media wanted us to feel sorry for the shooter, not the victims.

Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) had an unhinged fit in the Congressional hallway, and blamed the GOP for not doing something because his thinking is initiated by knee jerks.

When Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) stopped and brought up his bill to have trained teachers armed, so that there might be some measure of security, the idiot Bowman went berserk. Bowman said that more guns equal more death. So if an armed, trained teacher had a gun and shot the killer before she could kill innocent children and staff, that would lead to only one more death, not mass death. Bowman is clearly not a math genius.

If shooters know that teachers are armed, how many of these lunatics do you think would try a school shooting spree? Maybe they would go to a softer target, but taking it the next step, if concealed carry permits were universally easier to obtain, wouldn't these crazy killers think twice? And if they didn't think twice about firing on the public, wouldn't they be stopped sooner, rather than later when the police arrive?

Seconds count.

If they changed the term 'gun-free zones' to 'soft target zone' or 'unarmed target zone,' that might make mass shooters think twice about their chosen endeavor.

It's a sad irony that in schools where defunding the police was pushed by leftists, and officers were removed from these schools, [as in the Denver East High School] it became a target and did not end well on March 22nd as two people were wounded and the shooter killed himself.

By what logic does it make sense that outlawing guns--in a country that has more guns than people--would keep people willing to break the law shoot and kill the people who follow the law?

And before the bodies were cold, the left went into their "never let a tragedy go to waste" mode. 

Tweet

Judge puts restraining order on IL gun control law days after it goes into effect

Effingham County Judge Joshua Morrison temporarily blocked fat cat Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker from enforcing a newly enacted ban on certain semiautomatic rifles and high-capacity magazines. Using a temporary restraining order, the judge slapped the gun control law after former Republican candidate for attorney general Tom DeVore sued to block the law. 

DeVore spoke at a press release and said he's representing citizens from 87 Illinois counties who are challenging the law. He called it, "an outright attack on the constitutional rights of lawful gun owners across the state."

Morrison's ruling only applies to 850 plaintiffs listed in the lawsuit in Effingham County and four licensed gun dealers, but hopefully more gun owners will get the message and jump on board the freedom train.

Pritzker said the decision didn't surprise him and accused the plaintiffs of advancing "ideology over public safety" in seeking to have the law struck down. But it isn't ideology that is being advanced, it's advancing the individual's right to own and bear arms, particularly in defense against a government that would take that right away, much like all dictatorships do when seizing control over its people.

"We are well aware that this is only the first step in defending this important legislation," Pritzker said. "I remain confident that the courts will uphold the constitutionality of Illinois' law, which aligns with the eight other states with similar laws and was written in collaboration with lawmakers, advocates, and legal experts."

Except it is not constitutional by any stretch.

In an 11-page ruling, Morrison affirmed that the plaintiffs have a constitutional right to bear arms that is protected by both the Illinois state Constitution and the Constitution of the United States.

"Plaintiffs are being immediately and irreparably harmed each day in which their fundamental right to bear arms is being denied," Morrison wrote.

Just ask anyone who has ever needed to defend themselves with a firearm that ended up saving their life. And everyone knows, including the fat man, that if guns are made illegal [which is their ultimate goal] then the only people with guns will be the lawbreakers and the police. 

How ironic is it that the left wants to defund the police but only want the police to have guns?

Judge Morrison cited a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision from 2022 that struck down New York state’s concealed carry law. That 6-3 ruling in New York Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen found that the "plain text" of the Second Amendment protected the right of the plaintiffs in that case to carry firearms for self-defense.

"Due to the speed with which this bill was passed, the effect to protected classes could not have been considered, nor could the Legislature have studied if this was the least restrictive way to meet their goal," Morrison also wrote.

Pritzker signed the law on Jan. 10 in the knee-jerk response to the mass shooting that killed seven and injured 30 at the Highland Park July Fourth parade. The rationale for the law is that if guns magazines were restricted to 10 rounds for long guns and 15 rounds for handguns, along with other restrictions, the shooter would have complied with the law because mass shooters are basically law abiding murderers.

The idiot governor defended the gun control law, called the Protect Illinois Communities Act, saying it "takes weapons of war and mass destruction off the street while allowing law-abiding gun owners to retain their collections." 

Well, the name sounds good but it doesn't protect anyone who follows the law from those who break it.

 The left is good at labeling things as to how they want you to believe what they mean. Take for example the Inflation Reduction Act--it increases inflation and prioritizes their own issues such as climate change. Another example is the Pro-Choice movement, in which only one person gets to choose whether or not to take the life of the other unborn person.

The Illinois State Rifle Association, a gun rights group that filed a separate federal challenge to the law control law, applauded Morrison's ruling.

"This is a clear indication from the court that the General Assembly and Governor Pritzker rammed this law through improperly. The ISRA firmly believes the law is an infringement on all law-abiding residents’ 2nd Amendment rights," the group said.

Tweet

Racism and hating the US Constitution still nostalgic favorites among Democrats

" . . . the white supremacists, and . . . "

It's now obviously acceptable to be a full-blown racist if you're a Democrat. And while they're at it being racist, why not add a little disdain for the rule of law as laid out in the U.S. Constitution. White people don't mind if you make them pay reparations for what they personally didn't commit to people who were not the victims of the people who did commit those atrocities.

One of the most outspoken, least interesting, racists and certified dolts of the Democrat Party, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (TX) has introduced racist and unconstitutional legislation that would make it a crime for white people to use their First Amendment rights to make political criticism against minorities because, well, no rationale was given. 

On the other hand, minorities can still enjoy their First Amendment rights because that's who we are as a nation.

See, I told you she's a dolt, but don't tell anyone you heard it from me because I don't want to go to jail.

Is it that minorities are too sensitive or weak in character to hear criticism, even if when the criticism voiced is true? Are they fragile or unable to defend themselves against words that make them upset? 

It's the same progressive mentality that treats minorities as "less than" people and to me, that's the worst form of racism because it's dishonest and gives the racist feelings of even more superiority and virtue.

But Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (Dummy-TX) is a minority, you tell me. Yes, and she's one of the worst representatives of her race in the public eye. Compare her to Dr. Ben Carson, MLK, Tyrus, Larry Elder, Condoleezza Rice, Rachel Dolezal [kidding]. You get the picture.

Imagine, criminalizing speech under the false claim that it's "white supremacy" and not even defining the freaking term other than to accuse the entire GOP of it. 

This lie is dangerous, divisive and racist as hell, which is where people like Jackson Lee can go, and she can take with her Al Sharpton, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and everyone who would try to take away our God given freedom. We do not accept your anarchy. 

This is why they want to take away our Second Amendment first.

Tweet

TX state police terminate another Ranger for his Uvalde shooting response

Texas Ranger Christopher R. Kindell is seen in the bodycam still photograph above during the Robb Elementary School shooting in Uvalde, Texas on May 24, 2022 during which 19 people were killed by a lone gunman. Of the dead, there was 17 children and 2 adults.

The Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) decided to fire Kindell due to his response to the mass shooting. [H/T The Texas Tribune]

DPS Director Steve McCraw wrote in a letter Thursday that Kindell's actions following the shooting “did not conform to department standards.” 

“You should have recognized the incident was and remained an active shooter situation which demanded an active shooter response rather than a barricaded subject situation,” McCraw wrote in the letter obtained by the newspaper.

When asked for comment, Kindell only said that he intends to appeal his firing (and he has five days in which to do so).

Kindell’s suspension in September caused ripple effects through the criminal justice system in South and West Texas. Prior to the Uvalde incident, Kindell was lead investigator on 50 high-profile cases, including murders, public corruption, and sexual assaults.

However, law enforcement experts and the Uvalde County district attorney are asking whether DPS is merely covering their collective butts and retroactively punishing a handful of officers for disregarding policies that did not actually exist at the time of the shooting.

Among their concerns: By firing  a few officers, DPS and other law enforcement agencies will avoid serious analysis of how hundreds of police from multiple agencies stood by for more than 70 minutes while children and teachers lay shot in a fourth grade classroom.

In response to a request under the Texas Public Information Act, DPS said it does not have a written active-shooter policy. Instead, the agency said at the time of the Uvalde shooting that DPS relied on guidance from the Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training Center at Texas State University. Known as the ALERRT doctrine, it’s considered the premier active-shooter training program in the state.

Hanging outside the classroom where shots were being fired and victims were crying out were also not in the guidelines.

In July, McCraw sent an agency-wide memo telling DPS officers the agency “will continue to embrace the ALERRT doctrine, but with one important addition.”

“DPS Officers responding to an active shooter at a school will be authorized to overcome any delay to neutralizing an attacker,” McCraw wrote. “When a subject fires a weapon at a school he remains an active shooter until he is neutralized and is not to be treated as a ‘barricaded subject.’ We will provide proper training and guidelines for recognizing and overcoming poor command decisions at an active shooter scene.”

In October, McCraw terminated Juan Maldonado, a DPS sergeant who’d also responded to Robb Elementary on May 24. Maldonado opted to retire rather than appeal his firing.  In fact, the word "firing" apparently scares the crap out of him.

The shooting in Robb Elementary School give credence to the notion that trained personnel, particularly teachers, be allowed to carry or keep a firearm on hand to protect students and themselves, like the Second Amendment calls enumerates.

Tweet

Biden makes 'sick' remark proving yet again his ignorance

"Bang!"

Our puppet POTUS Joe Biden mumbled stuff on Thanksgiving about gun restrictions during a scripted press conference in Nantucket, MA. He received intense backlash from critics.

Never allowing a tragedy go to waste, the alleged President reiterated his ongoing support for new gun restrictions in order to make America a gun-free zone for law abiding people. He made reference to the recent mass shooting in Colorado in which none of the victims were armed

"The idea we still allow semi-automatic weapons to be purchased is sick," Biden said. "Just sick. It has no socially redeeming value. Zero. None. Not a single solitary rationale for it except profit for the gun manufacturers." He obviously prefers the blunderbuss. 

Biden likely has no idea what a semi-automatic weapon is, much less the difference between a bullet and a round--most progressives don't.

President Biden and who he thinks is his sister

A reporter asked Hunter Biden's father [aka the Big Guy] if he would be able to make any movement on new gun laws while Republicans control the House in the next Congress, to which he said he would make that assessment as he counts votes.

"I'm going to try," Biden said. "I’m going to try to get rid of assault weapons."

But the Left never defines what an 'assault weapon' is because their long-term goal is to totally disarm the public, and that's a fact Jack.

High profile Twitter users pointed out that semi-automatic weapons typically include handguns, rifles, and shotguns, which account for a large swathe of the gun sales in the U.S. 

[Fun Fact: Joe Biden owns a shotgun which he once advised people to shoot in the air to scare off any intruders, proving he knows as much about guns as he knows about gravity. Other leftists think you should shoot a gun-wielding intruder in the leg to stop him or her, proving they know as much as Biden about center mass targeting.]

Twitter, thanks to Elon, now allows for counter opinions as the site lit up after Biden spoke.

"So essentially all guns are on the Big Guy’s chopping block," Hollywood actor James Woods tweeted.

"Wow. Are there any guns Biden would not ban?" Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch, asked.

U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie, (R-KY) said that Biden was "maligning most gun owners" with his unconstitutional stance on firearm purchases and noted that Americans rejected gun control measures floated by House Speaker Nancy "Dentures-a-Dancing" Pelosi, (D-CA).

Fourth congressional district U.S. Representative-elect Mark Alford (R-MO) called Biden’s stance on gun laws "sheer ignorance," and cited an article noting that semi-automatic weapons make up 50% of all gun sales in America.

Earlier this year, Biden's call for an assault weapons ban went bust with Republicans, in spite of the fact that almost two dozen RINO senators bucked the gun lobby to advance a bipartisan gun bill.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Critical Race Theory, ignorance, The New York Times, and bovine flatulence. You also help me and the orphans. Thanks.

* * *

The left controls the House until January while the Senate is split 50- 50. For an assault weapons bill to pass, at least 10 RINOs would be required to break the Senate's 60-vote filibuster threshold.

Meanwhile, Biden is still known as the President of the United States and is still becoming more and more confused as each day passes into the jasmine of what is left of his mind.

Tweet