Colorado's transgenderism bill has Orwell rolling in his grave

Parental rights warriors are sounding the alarm on what they’re calling a straight-up "totalitarian" transgenderism bill that just got rammed through the Colorado state House. This thing’s got ‘em worried it could tank parents’ chances in custody battles if they dare "misgender" or "deadname" their kids. Yeah, you heard that right. Dystopian much?

Erin Lee, a fired-up mom from the Centennial State, laid it out plain on Fox News' "The Faulkner Focus" Monday: "This is giving the authority to our state to take our children away if we don’t agree with these gender transitions, so it’s got huge ramifications for all parents, especially those in custody situations who are fighting with their ex-spouses to stop their children from being medicalized." She didn’t hold back,

 adding, "It opens the door for all parents to potentially have their children forcibly removed by the state if they’re not willing to affirm their child’s mental health distress." 

The bill in question, HB25-1312, is a doozy. It slaps state-mandated gender policies on schools and calls it "coercive control" in custody cases if a parent doesn’t play along with their kid’s gender identity. 

Imagine this: the bill flat-out says, "when making child custody decisions and determining the best interests of a child for purposes of parenting time, a court shall consider deadnaming, misgendering or threatening to publish material related to an individual’s gender-affirming health-care services as types of coercive control." 

Dubbed the Kelly Loving Act—named after a transgender man killed in that 2022 Colorado nightclub shooting by a nonbinary gunman—this bill also tells Colorado courts to flip the bird to other states’ laws that yank kids from parents who green-light transgender treatments for minors. It’s a bold Orwellian move, and it’s got people angry.

For moms like Lee and California’s Erin Friday, this isn't just politics—it’s personal. 

Both their daughters went through a phase of identifying as boys, but Lee and Friday held firm, didn’t buy into it, and their girls eventually dropped the transgender label. Friday, who’s been a Democrat her whole life, didn’t mince words: "This bill will not only determine that parents like Erin and I are abusers — both of us had Child Protective Services come to our home when we refused to call our daughter males — but this bill also affects the press and its freedom of the press, and it will require them to use the chosen name of a child, how they choose it, and any adult." 

She’s calling it a "massive First Amendment violation," and she’s not wrong. This thing’s a constitutional gut-punch and like all good communist ideas, it takes parental authority away and gives it to Big Brother,.

Friday’s pushing for a bipartisan rebellion, saying parents gotta hit the courts, the public square, and those legislative hearings hard. She and Lee are crystal clear: the whole “born in the wrong body” idea is nonsense, and they’re not here for it. 

The bill’s now headed to the state Senate, so the fight’s far from over.
Oh, and get this: at a heated hearing last month, some Colorado Democrat had the gall to compare concerned parents to the KKK. Classy move, pal. Stay tuned, ‘cause this one’s gonna get messier than a bar fight on dollar-beer night.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine! No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Tulsi Gabbard exposes Biden's secret program to quiet conservatives

They thought they could bury it forever, locked away in a vault of secrecy and bureaucratic jargon. The Biden administration’s blueprint for dismantling American freedom was meant to stay hidden, shielded from the eyes of a public they claimed to serve.

But they didn’t see Tulsi Gabbard coming.

In a bombshell move that’s got the DC swamp in a frenzy, Director of National Intelligence Gabbard just ripped the crap-stained sheets off the Biden era’s most chilling and wordy document: the so-called “Strategic Implementation Plan for Countering Domestic Terrorism.”

“As promised, I have declassified the Biden Administration’s Strategic Implementation Plan for Countering Domestic Terrorism. Read it here: https://t.co/VAXDHkgZTK https://t.co/oNXjKDqamc” — DNI Tulsi Gabbard (
@DNIGabbard) April 16, 2025

Let’s strip away the Orwellian doublespeak. This isn’t a “plan to counter terrorism”—it’s a straight-up playbook for targeting conservatives. While Biden droned on about “unity,” his team was weaponizing Big Tech to silence dissent and building a surveillance state to track Americans with the “wrong” opinions. To his credit, Biden was likely not aware of what his handler[s] was doing because he wasn't aware of most everything beyond ice cream and hair.

The document’s a progressive fever dream: monitor “suspicious” online speech (read: anything right of AOC), bloat federal watchlists with conservatives, and—surprise—find fresh ways to gut the Second Amendment.

Don’t buy the “protecting democracy” hogwash. The Government Accountability Office confirms this wasn’t just talk—it was in motion. How many patriots got labeled “threats” for posting a MAGA meme or questioning an election?

They even slapped Tulsi Gabbard on the TSA’s terrorist watchlist. That’s the Left's America for you.

The plan’s biggest issue? A push for red flag laws and gun restrictions, cloaked as preventing “lethal means.” In their world, owning a firearm or loving the Constitution makes you a “domestic terrorist.”
The SIP ordered agencies to hunt down “DT-related content” online, cozying up with Big Tech to monitor, flag, and erase speech that didn’t toe the progressive line. First Amendment? What’s that?

The Twitter Files already exposed this game—government goons leaning on tech giants to smother dissent on COVID, elections, you name it. The report brags about agencies sharing “relevant information on DT-related and associated transnational terrorist online content” with private companies.

 
This wasn’t a misstep—it was a deliberate attack on the liberties that define America. While the left shrieked about “democracy under threat,” they were laying the groundwork for tyranny.

Gabbard’s declassification is a gut punch to the establishment, exposing what Biden’s “moderate” crew was cooking up in the shadows. Now we’re left wondering: what else is lurking in those classified files?
The founders would be spitting mad. But maybe this is the wake-up call America needs—a reminder of what happens when we let power-drunk bureaucrats run wild, far from the sunlight of accountability.

Next time you hear a Democrat preaching about “saving democracy,” remember this plan. Their version of “democracy” is a far cry from the Republic our founders bled for.

And know that Tulsi Gabbard has bigger balls than Biden and his handler[s], figuratively speaking, of course.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine! No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Ministry of Our Truth czar wouldn't know truth if it bit her on her butt

The PINO Biden administration is now openly showing their Orwellian side as they have chosen a person to head a Disinformation Governance Board, as part of the DHS. 

The person heading this Ministry of Our Truth, as it should be called, is a bizarre Mary Poppins fan named Nina Jankowicz. 

I refer to her as a Mary Poppins fan only because of a TikTok video she made in which she sang a song to the tune of Supercalifragilisticexpialodocious" about fake news. People who saw the video were upset with her for not taking the issue seriously. Now she's going to be the one to determine what is her truth versus the truth. 

In other words, the failing Biden administration wants to do what social media has done with free speech, and quash it, like they did with so many conservatives, including a sitting President, Donald Trump. It's exploding their heads that Elon Musk has bought Twitter, the only tech giant not on the far-left, and plans to allow open dialogue on both sides of the aisle.

Hopefully, you clicked on the video [at the above link] and watched Big Brother Jankowicz's performance--her voice isn't bad.

Some of the lyrics to the song are:

“Information laundering is really quite ferocious. It’s when a huckster takes some lies and makes them sound precocious, by saying them in Congress or a mainstream outlet, so disinformation’s origins are slightly less atrocious.”

It goes on and you can listen to it if you must.

Jankowicz as some kind of disinformation czar is like making Hunter Biden the head of the DEA. She was quick to say that Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation and of course, was proven wrong.

"Back on the ‘laptop from hell,’ apparently—Biden notes 50 former natsec officials and 5 former CIA heads that believe the laptop is a Russian influence op. Trump says ‘Russia, Russia, Russia,’" Jankowicz tweeted in October 2020.

After the tweet resurfaced and conservatives jumped on it, comrade Jankowicz cast doubt on the controversy by claiming it was "simply a direct quote" from the presidential candidates.

Double Speak.

However, a week prior to her tweet about the debate, she said the laptop should be viewed as a "Trump campaign product" during a conversation with the Associated Press.

Disinformation.

Now ask yourself why is the DHS involved in this crap in the first place? The agency is generally a waste, but even more significant is that it is supposed to protect the US from terrorist threats, not words. The Soros-funded fool who's heading the DHS, Alexandro Majorkas, is disregarding the actual mission of the department, but they never did a good job of it anyway. Now these clowns want to tell us what's true and what isn't? 

The pretend reason the Disinformation Governance Board was formed right after Musk bought Twitter and the 2022 midterm elections are just around the corner, is to counter online "misinformation" related to COVID-19, elections, and migrant smuggling. But really it's about elections and the other stuff is just stuffing.

Jankowicz, a Wilson Center global fellow [and Woodrow Wilson was a far-far-left a-hole who got us into war] upset a lot of normal people after it was found that she has pushed false and/or misleading information herself.

In March 2020 she announced that Facebook was providing the World Health Organization as well as other groups, as many free ads as they wanted for COVID-19 response, when she quoted and posted a tweet from Rob Leathern, who'd worked at the FB on integrity products.

"This is good. Now hope the rest of the adtech industry stops placing ads for mask and worse (straight up disinfo!) on articles and info about coronavirus," Jankowicz wrote on Twitter.

She was touting Pope Fauci and others in the U.S. health industry who, at that time was saying masks should not be worn. Fauci later admitted he lied [calling it a 'noble lie'] because he was concerned there wouldn't be enough PPE equipment to protect frontline health care workers. This was also at a time when health "experts" first said they didn't fully know how contagious coronavirus was or how it spread.

Disinformation.

Jankowicz also hyped up Chris Steele, the former British spy whose fake dossier was used in part as the impetus for the investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 presidential election. As we all know, the dossier has since been discredited as dubiously sourced and full of innuendo, rumor, or information that was already publicly available.

"Listened to this last night – Chris Steele (yes THAT Chris Steele) provides some great historical context about the evolution of disinfo. Worth a listen," Jankowicz wrote in August 2020.

And there's much more, including her tweets during Hillary Clinton's campaign when she posted this: "Maybe @HillaryClinton's most important point so far: 'A @realDonaldTrumppresidency would embolden ISIS.' #ImWithHer."

Disinformation: the Islamic State collapsed under Trump and now, under PINO Biden, the Taliban has made a comeback.

During a conversation with NPR just days ago, Jankowicz discussed Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter. She was concerned that "free speech absolutists" would have negative consequences for marginalized communities on social media platforms. She reiterated her point in an April 25 tweet. 

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

Whenever someone uses the term "free speech absolutist," know that they are extremists and fascists who want the power to determine what is and is not acceptable. When the issue came up that conservatives would not wear masks unless forced to do so she wrote: "So force away! Lock us down. People are not taking this seriously." 

No Mary Poppins, we are taking it seriously, you fascist! You don't get to dictate what is true and what is fake.

There is no doubt whatsoever that Jankowicz is a far-left operative and as Big Brother will suppress the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. 

Tweet