Trump announces Tulsi Gabbard's replacement

President Donald Trump announced Tuesday that he is appointing Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William J. “Bill” Pulte as Acting Director of National Intelligence following Tulsi Gabbard’s resignation last month.

The move puts one of Trump’s most loyal and aggressive reformers in charge of the nation’s intelligence apparatus. Pulte will continue serving as head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency while also taking the reins at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

Trump highlighted Pulte’s management credentials when announcing the appointment.

“William has deep experience managing the most sensitive matters in America, the safety and soundness of the Markets, and over 10 Trillion Dollars at Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac,” Trump said. The president also credited Pulte with helping deliver a “substantial increase” in housing market health over the past year.

Pulte succeeds Gabbard, who announced on May 22 that she would step down to support her husband as he battles a rare form of bone cancer. Her resignation becomes official at the end of June.

Gabbard leaves behind a tenure that dramatically reshaped the intelligence community. Her “ODNI 2.0” overhaul reduced the agency’s size by 40 percent, saving taxpayers an estimated $700 million annually. Her office also declassified more than 500,000 pages of previously withheld records, including documents related to allegations that the Obama administration weaponized intelligence agencies during the “Russia Hoax.”

Before departing on June 30, Gabbard plans to release additional investigative findings concerning Havana Syndrome, the origins and handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, and what she describes as the weaponization of the federal government.

Pulte is hardly a newcomer when it comes to taking on Washington’s political establishment. Since assuming leadership of the FHFA in March 2025, he has aggressively pursued allegations of financial misconduct involving several high-profile Trump critics.

Among the most notable cases is New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose civil fraud lawsuit against Trump made national headlines. Following an FHFA referral from Pulte, James was indicted on federal bank and mortgage fraud charges in Virginia. Pulte also referred Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA), a central figure in Trump’s first impeachment proceedings, to the Department of Justice over allegations of mortgage fraud.

The grandson of legendary homebuilder William J. Pulte, who built PulteGroup into a Fortune 500 powerhouse, Pulte charted his own course in private equity before entering public service.

He is also well known for his charitable work. In 2013, Pulte launched Blight Authority, a nonprofit organization focused on removing abandoned properties and combating urban decay in Detroit and Pontiac, Michigan. The effort earned widespread praise for improving neighborhood safety and revitalizing struggling communities.

Pulte later became a social media phenomenon through what became known as “Twitter Philanthropy,” personally giving away hundreds of thousands of dollars to Americans facing medical expenses, food insecurity, and other financial emergencies.

Now, with the intelligence community added to his portfolio, Pulte will have an opportunity to bring the same disruptive management style that has made him a favorite among Trump supporters and a frequent target of the president’s critics.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Lordy, Lordy, Comey indicted for alleged threats against Trump

Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted for a second time by the Justice Department. The charges stem from that unforgettable May 2025 Instagram masterpiece: a photo of seashells arranged in "86 47" formation on a beach, evidently during one of Comey's famous nature walks.

Comey is charged with "knowingly and willfully making a threat to take the life of, or inflict bodily harm upon, the President of the United States and knowingly and willfully transmitting a communication in interstate and foreign commerce that contained a threat to kill President Donald Trump," according to the indictment.

Both charges, released Tuesday by the DOJ, carry up to 10 years in prison. This follows a predictable wave of Republican criticism and Trump administration officials pointing out that a former FBI boss posting what sure looked like a coded hit on the president might be, you know, a problem.

"I think it's fair to say that threatening the life of anybody is dangerous and potentially a crime threatening the life of the president of the United States will never be tolerated by the Department of Justice," Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche told reporters during a news conference without going into specifics of the case.

"While this case is unique and this indictment stands out because of the name of the defendant, his alleged conduct is the same kind of conduct that we will never tolerate and that we will always investigate and regularly prosecute," he added.

In the slang often used in the service industry, to "86" something means to eject, cancel or get rid of it, kind of the similar expression: to 'deep 6' something.  And Trump is the 47th president. A reasonable person familiar with the circumstances would interpret this image as a "serious expression of an intent to do harm" to the president, per the charges.

The indictment also includes a Forfeiture Notice. If convicted, Comey must forfeit any property or proceeds derived from his alleged unlawful activities to the government.

A grand jury issued an arrest warrant for Comey. Blanche said he expects communication with Comey's legal counsel.

U.S. District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan, a George W. Bush appointee, has been assigned to the case.

"Well, they're back. This time about a picture of seashells on a North Carolina beach a year ago," Comey said in the 39-second clip. "But nothing has changed with me. I'm still innocent. I am still not afraid and I still believe in the independent federal judiciary. So let's go."

Comey added that it was "really important that all of us remember this is not who we are as a country."

"This is not how the Department of Justice is supposed to be. And the good news is we get closer every day to restoring those values," he added.

In a statement to Fox News, Comey's lawyer, Patrick Fitzgerald, said, "Mr. Comey vigorously denies the charges contained in the Indictment filed in the Eastern District of North Carolina. We will contest these charges in the courtroom and look forward to vindicating Mr. Comey and the First Amendment."

Comey removed the social media post of the shells the same day it was uploaded, claiming he had misinterpreted the shells as a general political message.

"I posted earlier a picture of some shells I saw today on a beach walk, which I assumed were a political message," Comey wrote in a subsequent post. "I didn't realize some folks associate those numbers with violence. It never occurred to me, but I oppose violence of any kind, so I took the post down."

Following the post, Comey was questioned by the U.S. Secret Service in Washington D.C. At the time, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said the former FBI chief should be "put behind bars" for allegedly "issuing a call to assassinate" Trump.

In an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier, Trump rejected this explanation.

"He knew exactly what that meant. A child knows what that meant," Trump said. "If you're the FBI director, and you don't know what that meant, that meant ‘assassination,’ and it says it loud and clear."

House Judiciary Ranking Member Jamie Raskin criticized the move by the DOJ, while recalling Trump's own remarks about Democratic lawmakers who urged military service members to disobey unlawful orders and his statement about former Rep. Liz Cheney.

"Trump's DOJ just criminally indicted James Comey for a beach photo of seashells and no other evidence cited," he said. "If that’s a crime in America, then what is calling the free speech of six Democratic Members of Congress ‘seditious behavior, punishable by DEATH’? What is suggesting a former Republican Member of Congress should have to ‘face nine barrels shooting at her’ with ‘the guns trained on her face’?"

This second indictment against Comey comes just hours after a federal judge in New York allowed a separate lawsuit brought by his daughter, Maurene Comey, to move forward against the DOJ.

Maurene Comey, a former federal prosecutor, is suing the DOJ over what she describes as an unlawful dismissal. Her lawsuit alleges she was terminated "solely or substantially because her father is former FBI Director James B. Comey, or because of her perceived political affiliation and beliefs, or both."

Comey was fired by Trump in 2017 during his first term over the handling of the Russia investigation. Since then, Comey has been a vocal critic of the president.

In September 2025, Comey was charged with lying to Congress regarding press leaks. However, a federal judge dismissed that case after ruling that the prosecutor involved had been improperly appointed. Comey’s legal team has declined to comment on this latest indictment.Earlier this month, Blanche said Trump has a "right" and a "duty" to influence federal investigations, including those involving his political enemies who probed him in the past.

"We have thousands of ongoing investigations and prosecutions going on in this country right now. It is true that some of them involve men, women and entities that the president in the past has had issues with and believes should be investigated," Blanche said at a press conference.He previously dismissed the notion that the DOJ has improperly been going after Trump opponents.

On April 14, the DOJ's Weaponization Working Group published a report accusing the Biden administration of weaponizing federal law.

Poor Jim. The seashells were just innocent little shells, you guys. Nothing to see here except a guy who ran the FBI deciding to play amateur assassination semaphore on Instagram. The left is already melting down, because of course they are. This is going to be fun.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. If you really want to help support my work here, please visit the sponsors on this page, or you can Buy Me A Coffee for any amount--it really helps. You can even subscribe to Brain Flushings--it's free.

Tweet

Tulsi Gabbard pulls security clearances of 37 intel officials: "Abused the public trust"

Well, guys, the hammer has finally come down, and it's about time. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, acting on orders from President Donald Trump, just yanked the security clearances of 37 current and former intelligence officials who have been playing fast and loose with the public's trust. You heard that right—37 of them, shown the door for "abusing the public trust" like it's just another Tuesday in D.C.

Fun Fact: the name 'Tulsi' means 'basil' in Hindi. 

Gabbard dropped the bombshell on X, releasing a memo that names these 37 individuals, some of whom were cozying up to the Obama-era intelligence assessment that screamed "Russia, Russia, Russia" to smear Trump's 2016 win. 

In her statement, Gabbard didn't mince words: "The President has directed that, effective immediately, the security clearances of the following 37 individuals are revoked. Their access to classified systems, facilities, materials, and information is to be terminated forthwith. Any contracts or employment with the U.S. Government by these 37 individuals is hereby terminated. Any credentials held by these individuals must be surrendered to the appropriate security officers."

She went on, torch in hand: "Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right. Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold." 

Bahdahbing!

Among the casualties were names like ex-Principal Deputy DNI Stephanie O'Sullivan and Vinh Nguyen, who helped former DNI James Clapper cobble together that oh-so-convenient 2016 report claiming "the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump's election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him." 

Sounds like a script straight out of a political hit job, doesn't it?

Gabbard's been on a tear, releasing a treasure trove of documents exposing the shady dealings behind that assessment. Get this: the report, ordered just weeks after Trump’s 2016 victory, was slapped together in a measly month, when a proper investigation would’ve taken a year or more. Documents show that on December 7, 2016, an initial assessment found Russia likely didn’t meaningfully meddle in the election. But that report vanished the next day after "new guidance" came down from on high. By December 9, Obama and his national security cronies huddled at the White House, and voilà, a new assessment was born, custom-tailored to fit the narrative.

Gabbard's memo lays it out plain: these 37 individuals aren't just losing their clearances; they're cut off from classified systems, government contracts, the works. And with Gabbard shining a spotlight on Obama's intelligence crew, it’s clear the swamp's getting a long-overdue draining. 

And if you want to Buy Me A Coffee, I wouldn't stop you--it supports my work and I really appreciate it. But no pressure.

Tweet

AG Bondi has DOJ unleashed on Russia Collusion Hoax

Attorney General Pam Bondi is swinging for the fences, and the Russia Collusion Hoax is in her crosshairs. Word dropped Monday afternoon that the Department of Justice is hauling evidence from that tired 2016 smear job before a grand jury. 

Fox News' David Spunt laid it out for Will Cain:

"Fox News can confirm that Attorney General Pam Bondi, today, signed an order directing an unnamed U.S. federal prosecutor to take evidence to a grand jury relating to an alleged conspiracy to tie then-2016 candidate Donald Trump to the country of Russia. Now, Fox News reviewed the one-page order, just hours ago signed by the attorney general. A source familiar with the probe confirms this as well. While a DOJ spokesperson declined to comment on this report of an investigation, Fox is told Attorney General Bondi is taking the referrals from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard 'very seriously.' The spokesperson says that Bondi believes there is 'clear cause for deep concern' and a need for the next steps."

This isn’t just a shot across the bow, it’s a cannon blast. Spunt dropped more context, pointing out this comes hot on the heels of DNI Tulsi Gabbard's criminal referral to the DOJ. She's calling it what it is: a straight-up conspiracy to kneecap Trump's 2016 run and his first term. The deep state' s playbook is getting torched, and Bondi's lighting the match.

Spunt broke down the grand jury game plan and why it's hush-hush for now:

"Now, to be clear today, there are no charges that have been filed, no indictments. This is incredibly early in the process. What we have here is taking evidence the Justice Department believes it has to a grand jury to secure an eventual indictment or indictments. We don’t know exactly where the grand jury will meet. We don’t know who will go before the grand jury, and that's by design because grand juries determine if there is enough evidence to indict, and grand juries are secretive in the American legal system, so it’s normal not to know all of the answers. Again, the DOJ declining on any comment regarding this investigation, but, Will, big news,  this was signed by the attorney general, Pam Bondi, today to take this evidence of an alleged conspiracy to a grand jury with the hope to get an indictment or multiple indictments."

Spunt's calling it early days, and he's not wrong. No charges, no indictments, yet. Grand juries are like black boxes; you don't get the full picture until they spit out a decision. But make no mistake, this is a seismic move. The DOJ is not just fishing, they're hunting for indictments, maybe a whole net full.

So, who's sweating right now? The old saying goes, "You can indict a ham sandwich," but the real question is: who's the ham in this scenario? There has to be a few folks in D.C. with nervous twitches, wondering if their name's on the list. Multiple targets could be in play, and you can bet they’re pacing the halls, rethinking their life choices.

Why go public with this grand jury move? Call it a hunch, but I suspect it's a one-two punch: first, to signal to the folks clamoring for justice that Bondi isn't playing patty-cake; she's out for blood. Second, it's a loud warning to the guilty: start singing, or you might be the next ham sandwich on the chopping block.

This could drag on for weeks, maybe months, before we see indictments, if they come at all, so don't hold your breath. But let's be real: this is the Russia collusion hoax getting dragged back into the spotlight, and it's about time. 

Hey guys, if you enjoy Brain Flushings, I hope you'll consider supporting my work with a small donation to Buy Me a Coffee. It fuels my late-night writing sessions with fresh ideas. No pressure.

Tweet

Former DNI James Clapper has "lawyered up" and is upset as a waterboarded cat

James "not wittingly" Clapper

The Russia Collusion saga just got a fresh twist, and it’s got some big players sweating, James Clapper, for one. 

Obama's old Director of National Intelligence, got tossed a hot potato by CNN's Kaitlan Collins about the current DNI Tulsi Gabbard, calling for a criminal probe into that whole Russia Collusion clusterfrack. You know, the one we've been yelling about forever.

As we said earlier, Gabbard's not messing around. She's kicked this over to the DOJ, and they've spun up a full-on Strike Force to dig into it. That’s the kind of language that makes you sit up straight; sounds like they’re finally ready to throw some punches. 

Now, I get it, we’re all a bit cynical after years of "will anything actually come of this?" But this feels like they’re gearing up for real. Sure, statute of limitations might tie their hands on some counts, and time's a cruel beast when it comes to building a case. But that announcement? It’s got the right vibe, like they're ready to flip every stone and see who's still got dirt on their hands.

So, Collins [no relation to RINO Susan Collins] corners Clapper on CNN, asking if he’s sweating bullets over the Trump admin maybe coming for him. His response is pure gold:

"Well, certainly I do. You know, after eight and a half years of this, and I don't know of an intelligence product that was more scrutinized, more investigated than that product was by numerous people...You know, it's very disconcerting. It really is. And I take seriously when the President of the United States accuses me of being a participant in a treasonous conspiracy, which is ridiculous."

Cue an adult diaper commercial.

Clapper’s out here calling it "untrue," but you can almost hear his knees knocking. Collins pushes harder, like, "What’s your move if they come for you? Got a plan?" 

And Clapper says: "I'll lawyer up, I suppose. I already have."

C'mon man, this dude’s been lawyered up since he bounced from government in 2017. That’s not the talk of a guy chilling by the pool. That’s a guy who's been sleeping with one eye open for years. Folks on X are eating this up, saying Clapper sounds like he's about to jump out of his skin. Also, it's probably not the best move to be yapping on CNN about it. Most lawyers would be like, "Yo, zip it, even if you think you’re clean." 

Rookie mistake, Jimbo.

This whole mess is about to get wild. I’m betting we’ll see more big names scrambling for legal cover faster than you can say "subpoena." And those whistleblowers Gabbard’s talking about? If they’ve got the goods, it could be the spark this case needs to light up.

Hey amazing readers! If you enjoy my content, I hope you'll consider supporting Brain Flushings. A quick coffee donation via Buy Me a Coffee fuels late-night writing sessions and fresh ideas. Every sip—er, dollar—helps me create more of the posts you enjoy. Join the crew, toss in a coffee, and let’s keep the good vibes brewing! No pressure.

Tweet

DNI Gabbard: CIA Director Brennan suppressed intel that Russia interfered with material on Hillary Clinton

Things of beauty are a joy forever, but not in this case

It looks as if the truth just drop-kicked the Russia hoax into next week. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard unleashed a bombshell Wednesday, declassifying a House Intelligence Committee report that exposes then-CIA Director John Brennan as the ringleader of a scheme to bury explosive intel. What was he hiding? Oh, just that Vladimir Putin was sitting on a treasure trove of dirt on Hillary Clinton, stuff so juicy he planned to drop it after her expected 2016 coronation to torpedo her presidency. 

That’s right, Brennan didn’t just fumble the ball; he spiked it to protect the Clinton machine.

At a White House press briefing alongside press secretary Karoline Leavitt, Gabbard laid it all bare, quoting the September 2020 House Intelligence Committee oversight majority staff report she declassified that very day. The report reveals Putin wasn’t playing favorites in 2016, he wasn't Team Trump or Team Hillary. No, the Russian bear wanted to burn the whole system down by undermining faith in the election itself. As Gabbard put it, "In fact, this report shows Putin held back… from leaking compromising material on Hillary Clinton prior to the election, instead planning to release it after the election to weaken what Moscow viewed as an inevitable Clinton presidency."

Let that sink in. 

Putin thought Hillary was such a lock that he saved his best shots for after she won. And what did he have? According to Gabbard, the report details "possible criminal acts" by Clinton, plus high-level DNC emails exposing her "psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness" and alleged daily reliance on heavy tranquilizers. Yes, you read that right; Hillary was supposedly popping pills like candy while her team was cutting shady deals. 

The report also alleges secret meetings with U.S. religious organizations, where State Department officials dangled cash for Clinton's campaign in exchange for their support. Oh, and let's not forget the State Department employees allegedly strong-armed into backing Hillary's White House bid. This is the kind of corruption that makes your skin crawl.

Gabbard didn’t hold back, pointing the finger squarely at Brennan for orchestrating a cover-up. She told reporters one of the report’s key findings: "In the January 2017 intelligence community assessment that President Obama ordered, John Brennan, who was CIA director at the time, and the intelligence community intentionally suppressed intelligence that showed Putin was saving the most damaging material that he had in his possession about Hillary Clinton until after her potential and likely victory." 

Brennan obviously didn’t just ignore the truth; he buried it deeper than Jimmy Hoffa.

But it gets worse. Gabbard revealed that Brennan and his intel cronies "mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious, substandard sources" to push the laughably fake narrative that Putin was all-in for Trump. They cooked up a story to undermine Trump’s legitimacy, and the media lapped it up like obedient lapdogs. 

This wasn’t incompetence, it was a deliberate hit job. 

Enter Charlie Kirk, the Turning Point USA firebrand, who nailed it Wednesday when he said, "If Russia was really all-in on supporting Trump and hurting Clinton, it would have leaked this information in October 2016 when her lead in the RCP average slipped to just +1.3." Exactly! If Putin was Team Trump, he’d have dumped the Clinton dirt when it could’ve swung the election. Instead, he sat on it, "completely debunking the core assumptions of the Russia hoax," Kirk added. “Rather than admit they were wrong, Brennan’s CIA buried the info and manufactured a completely alternative reality to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump.”

So, let’s recap: Brennan, the supposed guardian of truth, hid evidence that could’ve exposed Hillary’s corruption, all to prop up the Russia-Trump collusion fairy tale. This isn’t just a scandal; it’s a betrayal of the American people. The Deep State didn’t just play dirty, they rewrote the rulebook. 

Time to drain the swamp, folks, because this stench isn’t going away on its own.

Hey amazing readers! If you enjoy my content, please consider supporting Brain Flushings. A quick coffee donation via Buy Me a Coffee fuels late-night writing sessions and fresh ideas. Every sip—er, dollar—helps me create more of the posts you enjoy. Join the crew, toss in a coffee, and let’s keep the good vibes brewing! 

Tweet

Tulsi Gabbard Drops a Truth Bomb: Obama’s Russia Hoax Was a Slap in the Face to American Voters

The Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard just unloaded a haymaker on the Obama administration’s legacy of meddling. On Friday’s "Hannity," Gabbard didn’t mince words, accusing Barack Hussein Obama and his cronies of orchestrating the Russia collusion narrative to "subvert the American people’s will" in the 2016 election. I don't know what you think, but I believe it's kind of a big deal when a former president basically flips off voters who had the audacity of hope to pick Trump over Killery.

Gabbard, who’s apparently had enough of the Beltway’s nonsense, declassified a juicy stack of over 100 documents on Friday, laying bare what she calls "overwhelming evidence" of Obama’s team cooking up the Trump-Russia probe to kneecap the 45th president before he even got started. "It lays out, these over 100 documents that you're referencing, that I declassified and released, spells out in great detail exactly what happens when you have some of the most powerful people in our country directly leading at the helm, President Obama and his senior-most national security cabinet, James Comey, John Brennan, James Clapper, and Susan Rice and others, essentially making a very intentional decision to create this manufactured, politicized piece of intelligence with the objective of subverting the will of the American people," she told Hannity. 

Nuclear mic drop!

Let’s be real, this isn’t just some partisan food fight. Gabbard made it abundantly clear that this is about the "integrity and strength of our democratic republic." 

She’s not wrong. When the guy in the Oval Office and his posse of spooks allegedly decide to ignore the election results because they don’t like the outcome, that’s not democracy. That’s a temper tantrum with a security clearance. 

Gabbard claims Obama’s goal was to "not accept the decision of the American people" and use this "manufactured, politicized piece of intelligence" to fuel a "years-long coup against President Trump." And she’s got the receipts.

The fallout was a 'mere' $40 million Mueller investigation that dragged on like The Hundred Years War, congressional impeachments, endless smears against Trump and his family, and some of his team getting investigated, arrested, or jailed. 

Plus, let’s not forget the bonus prize: ratcheting up tensions with Russia because, apparently, we didn’t have enough problems. "The years-long Mueller investigation that cost taxpayers almost $40 million to congressional impeachments, endless smears and attacks against not only President Trump, but his family. He had senior members of his team who were investigated, some arrested and jailed. We had heightened and increased tensions between the United States and Russia. The list goes on and on about the consequences of President Obama and his senior cabinet members politicizing intelligence," Gabbard laid out. It’s like a greatest hits album of political malfeasance.

Fox News Digital reached out to Obama’s camp for comment, but I’m guessing they’re too busy polishing their halos to respond. They didn’t answer earlier calls about Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Rice, Lynch, or McCabe either. Shocker.

Gabbard’s not stopping at declassifying documents and calling out names. She’s tossing the whole pile to the Department of Justice for a closer look, because accountability isn’t just a buzzword, it’s "critical" to keeping faith in our republic. 

"I am referring all of these documents that we have found and uncovered, referring them to the Department of Justice for further investigation. Accountability and action; not just investigation, but action. Accountability has to take place. The American people's ability to have faith and trust in the integrity of our democratic republic is literally what's at stake and therefore the future of our ability to exist as the country that we know it. This accountability is critical to make sure that this never happens again," Gabbard said. 

And then there’s the Steele dossier, that sketchy piece of fan fiction the left treated like the Koran. Gabbard didn’t hold back, claiming Obama "directed" its creation, even though the intelligence community itself was screaming, "This is not credible and should not be used at all." 

Her words: "The Steele dossier was used in this manufactured assessment that President Obama directed to be created along with many other pieces of intelligence that the intelligence community itself, for months leading up to the election, said, 'This is not credible and should not be used at all.'" Yet, they ran with it anyway. Because who needs credibility when you have an agenda?

On Saturday’s "Fox and Friends," Gabbard doubled down, calling the Obama administration’s antics a "treasonous conspiracy" against Trump. "No one, no matter who they are, no matter how high up they are or how powerful they may be, no matter who the intelligence officials or professionals were, who were a part of this treasonous conspiracy, there must be accountability," she asserted. Treasonous. Conspiracy. Gabbard’s not here to play nice, and honestly, why should she? If her claims hold water, this is the kind of thing that makes you wonder if the cesspool too deep to drain.

Hey amazing readers! If you enjoy my content, please consider supporting Brain Flushings. A quick coffee donation via Buy Me a Coffee fuels late-night writing sessions and fresh ideas. Every sip—er, dollar—helps me create more of the posts you enjoy. Join the crew, toss in a coffee, and let’s keep the good vibes brewing! 

Tweet

DNI Tulsi Gabbard targeting "deep state" intelligence leakers with criminal referrals

Tulsi Gabbard, our new Director of National Intelligence, is swinging a sledgehammer at the deep-state leakers who’ve been treating classified information like it’s gossip at a D.C. cocktail party. In a Wednesday X post that radiated “don’t mess with me” energy, Gabbard dropped a bombshell: she’s recommended charges for a pair of leaks, with a third on deck.

“Politicization of our intelligence and leaking classified information puts our nation’s security at risk and must end. Those who leak classified information will be found and held accountable to the fullest extent of the law,” she said, sounding like she’s ready to personally drag these traitors to court. She’s not playing—Gabbard’s got her sights on a recent Washington Post leak about Iran and Israel, which she flagged back in March when she first vowed to hunt down these slime-balls.

“Today, I referred two intelligence community LEAKS to the Department of Justice for criminal referral, with a third criminal referral on its way, which includes the recent illegal leak to the Washington Post,” she added, making it clear she’s got receipts and isn’t afraid to use them. 

No names were dropped, and we’re still waiting to see if the DOJ and FBI will grow a spine and actually pursue charges. Don’t hold your breath, though—those agencies aren’t exactly known for speed.

Gabbard’s not mincing words about the culprits: “These deep-state criminals leaked classified information for partisan political purposes to undermine POTUS’ agenda. I look forward to working with [the DOJ] and [the FBI] to investigate, terminate and prosecute these criminals,” she said, practically daring the swamp to keep testing her. 

This is the same Tulsi who traded her Hawaii congressional seat for a combat vet’s grit and a Senate-confirmed DNI gig under Trump, passing with a 52-48 vote in February. She’s got the scars and the resolve to back up her threats. [Remember how the Left said Trump is afraid of strong, intelligent women?]

Flash back to March, when Gabbard first promised to clean house in the sprawling 18-member Intelligence Community—think CIA, NSA, FBI, and military branches. “Our nation’s Intelligence Community must be focused on our national security mission. Politically motivated leaks undermine our national security and the trust of the American people, and will not be tolerated,” she warned on X, sounding like a Parris Island drill instructor fed up with recruits. 

“Unfortunately, such leaks have become commonplace with no investigation or accountability. That ends now. We know of and are aggressively pursuing recent leakers from within the Intelligence Community and will hold them accountable,” she added.

She even name-checked some of the media’s favorite leaker landing spots: The Washington Post, HuffPost, The Record, and NBC, where some IC weasel spilled U.S.-Russia intel. “Any unauthorized release of classified information is a violation of the law and will be treated as such,” she capped off, basically etching “you’re toast” on every leaker’s forehead.

This all ties back to a messy episode before The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg—yeah, that jerk—bragged about snooping on a Signal chat where Trump officials were hashing out airstrikes on Iran-backed Houthi terrorists in Yemen. He should have alerted the chat that he was mistakenly put there, but he didn't and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz took the fall, blaming his iPhone’s “automated suggestion” feature for the breach. The Trump team swears no classified info was spilled, and the boss is standing by Waltz. 

Still, it’s a bad look, and Gabbard’s clearly done with the excuses and she plans to kick ass.

Bottom line? Gabbard’s on a mission to plug the leaks and restore some semblance of integrity to our intelligence ops. Whether the DOJ and FBI will match her gusto or just shuffle papers remains to be seen. For now, she’s got the deep state sweating—and that’s a beautiful thing. Keep your powder dry, folks.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine! No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Tulsi Gabbard exposes Biden's secret program to quiet conservatives

They thought they could bury it forever, locked away in a vault of secrecy and bureaucratic jargon. The Biden administration’s blueprint for dismantling American freedom was meant to stay hidden, shielded from the eyes of a public they claimed to serve.

But they didn’t see Tulsi Gabbard coming.

In a bombshell move that’s got the DC swamp in a frenzy, Director of National Intelligence Gabbard just ripped the crap-stained sheets off the Biden era’s most chilling and wordy document: the so-called “Strategic Implementation Plan for Countering Domestic Terrorism.”

“As promised, I have declassified the Biden Administration’s Strategic Implementation Plan for Countering Domestic Terrorism. Read it here: https://t.co/VAXDHkgZTK https://t.co/oNXjKDqamc” — DNI Tulsi Gabbard (
@DNIGabbard) April 16, 2025

Let’s strip away the Orwellian doublespeak. This isn’t a “plan to counter terrorism”—it’s a straight-up playbook for targeting conservatives. While Biden droned on about “unity,” his team was weaponizing Big Tech to silence dissent and building a surveillance state to track Americans with the “wrong” opinions. To his credit, Biden was likely not aware of what his handler[s] was doing because he wasn't aware of most everything beyond ice cream and hair.

The document’s a progressive fever dream: monitor “suspicious” online speech (read: anything right of AOC), bloat federal watchlists with conservatives, and—surprise—find fresh ways to gut the Second Amendment.

Don’t buy the “protecting democracy” hogwash. The Government Accountability Office confirms this wasn’t just talk—it was in motion. How many patriots got labeled “threats” for posting a MAGA meme or questioning an election?

They even slapped Tulsi Gabbard on the TSA’s terrorist watchlist. That’s the Left's America for you.

The plan’s biggest issue? A push for red flag laws and gun restrictions, cloaked as preventing “lethal means.” In their world, owning a firearm or loving the Constitution makes you a “domestic terrorist.”
The SIP ordered agencies to hunt down “DT-related content” online, cozying up with Big Tech to monitor, flag, and erase speech that didn’t toe the progressive line. First Amendment? What’s that?

The Twitter Files already exposed this game—government goons leaning on tech giants to smother dissent on COVID, elections, you name it. The report brags about agencies sharing “relevant information on DT-related and associated transnational terrorist online content” with private companies.

 
This wasn’t a misstep—it was a deliberate attack on the liberties that define America. While the left shrieked about “democracy under threat,” they were laying the groundwork for tyranny.

Gabbard’s declassification is a gut punch to the establishment, exposing what Biden’s “moderate” crew was cooking up in the shadows. Now we’re left wondering: what else is lurking in those classified files?
The founders would be spitting mad. But maybe this is the wake-up call America needs—a reminder of what happens when we let power-drunk bureaucrats run wild, far from the sunlight of accountability.

Next time you hear a Democrat preaching about “saving democracy,” remember this plan. Their version of “democracy” is a far cry from the Republic our founders bled for.

And know that Tulsi Gabbard has bigger balls than Biden and his handler[s], figuratively speaking, of course.

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine! No pressure, it's your call.

Tweet

Aliakbar Mohammed Amin arrested for threats against Trump and Tulsi Gabbard

Aliakbar  [sound familiar?] Mohammed [still familiar?] Amin was arrested by the FBI on Friday night. He had mad threats against President Trump and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. It's obvious you don't threaten a President and an intelligence head when you don't have enough intelligence to carry out the threats.

Amin 25, was busted in Lilburn, Georgia, near Atlanta. 

A source close to Gabbard said the FBI told her that a firearm was confiscated from the genius jihadi Amin at the time of the arrest, and that a trial date has been set for later this month.

“Bottom line, the FBI does not tolerate threats and will hold offenders fully accountable,” the local FBI Atlanta office said on Friday night. The FBI says more information regarding the specific threats will be released next week.

The arrest comes days after the Communist News Network (CNN) dismissed credible threats against Ms. Gabbard, suggesting, with no evidence, that her attempts to hide the address of a Texas property she owns were actually part of an attempt to commit voter fraud. Her office has raged at the fools at CNN for running the story, threatening to file a defamation lawsuit and accusing the fake outlet of putting her safety at risk.

“I told CNN that Tulsi Gabbard had credible, active threats against her and her family and they went ahead and doxxed her address anyway,” wrote Alexa Henning, Gabbard’s deputy chief of staff at the intelligence office, after the FBI announced the arrest on Friday. 

The network needs to be sued yet again as they have learned nothing since Nick Sandmann sued them for $275,000,000 and they settled out of court, likely for less, but a substantial sum nevertheless. They keep stepping on The Rake of Credibility.

CNN was investigating whether Gabbard committed fraud by voting in Hawaii, where she served in Congress and lived nearly her whole life, after declaring a property her “homestead” in Texas. Her office told CNN that the reason it was declared a homestead was because, in Texas, that designation allows you to keep the address private.

And why would someone smart enough like the DNI Director risk casting a second vote in an election where the separation from first to worst is in the hundreds of thousands or millions?

“Declaring her ‘homestead’ in Texas, per law, ensured her address would remain confidential in response to ongoing, high-level, credible threats against her and her family,” Gabbard spokeswoman Olivia Coleman said. 

This was communicated to CNN a week before the idiots there published its story, which disregarded the e explanation because it didn't fit their narrative.

Meanwhile, the arrest also comes as protests rage against Trump, top members of his administration, and his allies. 

Earlier on Friday, a Pennsylvania scumwafer named Shawn [last name omitted so he never gets his fifteen minutes of fame] was arrested for writing that he planned to assassinate Trump on YouTube, where he posted as “Mr. Satan.” Shawn lived in Butler, Pennsylvania, where Trump narrowly escaped an attempt on his life during a campaign rally last summer.

Shawn’s arrest came after he wrote on YouTube that all of Trump’s appointments needed to be killed. Sadly and quite disturbingly, this seems to be how many on the far-left feel about Trump's appointments and supporters.

“We just need to start killing people, Trump, Elon, all the heads of agencies Trump appointed, and anyone who stands in the way,” the idiot wrote in a remark that was flagged for authorities by Google, according to The New York Times.

Loving the blog? Toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee if you’re feeling generous – it’s like a high-five with caffeine! No pressure.

Gabbard, a former Democrat who bucked her party to support Trump, has attracted particular anger from the Left as they continue to lose their collective minds and still have nothing new to say about what their stance is other than it's everything opposite to Trump's.

Tweet

NBC has proof Lee Harvey Oswald didn't kill JFK

Let us turn our gaze to a spectacle that threatens to shake the foundations of a narrative long held sacrosanct by the chattering classes of America. 

Astonishing allegations have emerged, not with a whisper but with the force of a thunderclap, concerning a hitherto unseen NBC video that might—just might—topple the official account of John F. Kennedy’s assassination. 

The claim comes courtesy of Republican Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), who chose the appropriately dramatic stage of “Jesse Watters Primetime” on Fox News to lob this particular grenade into the public square. According to Luna, this tape—shrouded in mystery like some lost artifact of a bygone age—purports to show Lee Harvey Oswald lingering near the vehicle in which JFK rode to his doom in Dallas, Texas, at a spot that would render his role as the shooter not merely implausible but impossible.

Luna, with the earnestness of someone who has stumbled upon a truth too big to keep quiet, declared, "I would like to actually tell the American people, it was made, uh, aware to me this evening that NBC actually has a video that's never been seen before. We're actually going to be... sending a letter requesting that from NBC, because it allegedly shows Oswald, um, near the vehicle when the assassination took place, which means that he couldn't have been the shooter. So again, we're tracking down all this information." 

If she's right—and that is a conditional of Himalayan proportions—this could dismantle the "lone gunman theory," a story clung to by officialdom with the desperation of a drowning man clutching driftwood.

To bolster her case, Luna invokes a CIA document, unearthed by the diligent journalist Jefferson Morley, which suggests that even the agency’s own mandarins harbored doubts about the solitary assassin tale. "There is even a CIA document that came out that Mr. Morley pointed out that actually said that the CIA never bought the lone gunman theory," she said, before adding with a note of quiet triumph, "I think the American people had an inclination as to what we were saying, but we never had the hard evidence until now." Here we see the specter of institutional skepticism, a crack in the edifice of certainty that has stood for decades.

And then there is Trump, who, earlier this month, flung open the JFK files with the flourish of a man who enjoys nothing more than upending the apple cart. Luna, ever the patriot, lauds this act of disclosure: "In a free and fair society, how could you operate or have an agency operating in the shadows? Kudos to President Trump, also Director [John] Ratcliffe, and Tulsi Gabbard for pushing for this transparency. It is going to be generational changing that they've done this." She vows to pursue legislation to banish such opacity from government corridors forevermore, though her immediate crusade is to wrench this elusive video from NBC’s grasp.

When Fox News host Jesse Watters—a man whose bluntness could fell an oak—pressed her on whether NBC had been deliberately squirreling away this tape, Luna did not flinch: "Correct. In fact, uh, Director [Oliver] Stone actually told us that he was showed this tape, uh, that it was a secondary copy, and that he said that this could blow open the entire JFK, um, investigation. What I will also tell you though, Jesse, is he said that NBC's been very, very much so guarding this tape, and so I believe that that tape belongs to the American people." If Oliver Stone, that perennial gadfly of American complacency, is to be believed, we are on the cusp of a revelation that could rewrite history—or at least make for a riveting documentary.

Luna’s call to arms is clear: "We are going to be sending a letter asking for that tape, and I would encourage everyone to ask NBC to release that tape to the public. It's important not just for our investigations, but so the American people know the truth as to what happened with John F. Kennedy." The tweet from Watters amplifies the drama: 

"BREAKING:

@realannapaulina tells Primetime that NBC has a secret tape that shows Lee Harvey Oswald near JFK's vehicle when the assassination took place... which would mean he wasn't the shooter. pic.twitter.com/SI34rf2HPG— Jesse Watters (@JesseBWatters) March 29, 2025."

Should these claims hold water, they could reignite a debate that has smoldered since November 22, 1963, forcing Americans to reconsider what they thought they knew. 

But let us not be hasty. Does this tape exist? Does it show what Luna claims? I remain, as ever, a skeptic. She has not seen it herself, and until it materializes—until we can scrutinize it with our own eyes—I shall not be persuaded. The truth, like a rare jewel, must be held up to the light, not merely dangled as a promise.

"Hey, if you’re enjoying this blog as much as I enjoy writing it, feel free to fuel my caffeine addiction over at Buy Me a Coffee – no pressure, just good vibes!"

Tweet

NPR, PBS on hotseat--their leaders defend the indefensible

Imagine this: Wednesday rolls around, and the House DOGE subcommittee decides it’s time to drag "public" broadcasting into the hot seat. Why? Because NPR and PBS have been happily cashing taxpayer checks while pretending half the country doesn’t exist. 

Under a relentless GOP grilling, NPR CEO Katherine Maher—who’s clearly been practicing for the “oops, my bad” Olympics—admits it was a "mistake" to shrug off the Hunter Biden laptop story like it was a bad TikTok trend. She also wrings her hands over some pre-NPR tweets where she called Trump a "deranged racist sociopath" and mused that looting’s no biggie (it’s just "counterproductive," you see). 

Oh, and if reports are true, NPR’s newsroom has zero Republicans? She says that’d be "disturbing." Uh-huh. Sure, Kathy, as if you didn't know.

Now, how much airtime did this spicy little showdown get on ABC, CBS, and NBC? Zilch point pooh. Nada. Crickets. Not a peep on the evening news, not a whisper on the morning gabfests the next day. You’d think a hearing with this much red meat would at least get a nod, right? You would be wrong.

But don’t worry—the Big Three weren’t too busy to obsess over "Signalgate." 

Yep, Trump’s crew chatting up a Houthi strike on the encrypted Signal app—while letting Trump-hating leftist journo Jeffrey Goldberg, editor of The Atlantic and PBS’s "Washington Week" host, eavesdrop—was apparently the story of the century. If he gave a fig about the country, he would have immediately told the host on the Signal meeting that somehow they screwed up by having him on. Instead, he quietly took notes and later reported on it. As it turned out, the Houthi strike went without a hitch in spite of it all.

ABC’s "World News Tonight" and "NBC Nightly News" trotted out footage of CIA boss John Ratcliffe and DNI Tulsi Gabbard sweating under Democrat questions about the breach. NBC’s Lester Holt hyped it as a "bombshell text" to kick off his broadcast—because of course he did. Over on "CBS Evening News," Ed O’Keefe was practically salivating for scalps, asking if heads would roll. He even roped in Goldberg and Obama’s old Defense Sec Chuck Hagel to fan the flames. 

By the end, O’Keefe noted the Senate Armed Services Committee’s bipartisan call for a probe, with GOP chair Roger Wicker grumbling that it’s "a shame this security question is distracting the public from the success of that mission." A shame? You don’t say.

The networks’ playbook is predictable as a sitcom rerun: bury Trump wins, amplify Trump stumbles. 

So let’s dig into the PBS-NPR hearing they conveniently ignored: NPR’s Maher finally copped to the Hunter Biden laptop fumble. Back in 2020, they dismissed it as a "pure distraction"—now, with GOP heat on and taxpayer bucks at stake, she’s all, "Our current editorial leadership thinks that was a mistake, as do I." Breaking news, folks: NPR admits a screw-up! Mark your calendars.

Maher also did a mea culpa on her unhinged tweets—like calling Trump a "deranged racist sociopath" and saying America’s "addicted to white supremacy." She’s "evolved," she claims in the style of Barack Obama on gays in the military, but those hot takes fit NPR’s woke vibe like a glove. Bet they were on her résumé under "qualifications."

PBS prez Paula Kerger and Maher swore up and down their news is "nonpartisan and unbiased." Then Texas Rep. Pat Fallon dropped some NewsBusters truth bombs: "News Hour" slapped "far-right" labels 162 times but only used "far-left" six times. PBS’s 2024 convention coverage was 72% negative for the GOP, 88% positive for Dems. Kerger’s response? "Never heard of those studies." Great prep work, Paula, if you're being honest.

Remember NPR editor Uri Berliner’s exposé? He found 87 Democrats and zero Republicans in NPR’s D.C. newsroom. Another zero.

 Maher called it "disturbing" if true, but after a year on the job, has she hired a single non-lefty? Nope. Berliner wasn’t even GOP, and they still canned him.

GOP reps pointed out NPR interviewed Dem Rep. Adam Schiff 25 times during the Russia hoax—some say 32, but who’s counting? Meanwhile, Rep. James Comer, the Republican Oversight chair, got zero chats about his Biden probe. Fallon asked Maher about it; she drew a blank. Zero’s the answer, Kathy. The Sunday shows pull the same stunt.

This isn’t new. For 50 years, broadcast news has hyped Democrat hearings—Watergate, Iran-Contra, Anita Hill, January 6—like they’re Super Bowls, while GOP-led ones get tossed in the shredder. PBS and NPR had to cover this DOGE hearing, but they weren’t happy about it. NPR’s David Folkenflik whined it was more about "scoring points than finding facts." Pot, meet kettle.

The networks? They’ll skip any fact that messes with their narrative. It’s not about truth—it’s about winning. And they wonder why we don’t trust ‘em.

And this has been where our tax money has been going without our permission.

"Thanks for reading! If you’d like to toss a coffee my way, check out my Buy Me A Coffee—means a lot!"

Tweet

US Intelligence Chief says Islamic terrorism most urgent security threat

Islamic terrorism has been a staple of the religion since the inception of the religion. The goal has always been global conquest and the establishment of a world caliphate where every human being worships Allah or pays a tax known as jizya, or be killed. It's convert, pay or die, especially Jews.

Thus, there is no such thing as "radical" Islam, because taken literally, Islamic scripture demands Muslims to create a world caliphate by the means explained above. Terrorists, therefore, are simply following the teachings of the Qur'an, Hadith, and Reliance on the Traveller, [Umdat al-Salik wa Uddat al-Nasik], the teachings of jurisprudence and worshipping.

Groups such as CAIR, ISNA and others need to be classified as terrorist organizations because they all share the same goal of creating a world caliphate.

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard warned in a recent interview that “radical Islamist terrorism” poses the greatest threat to the safety of the American people, potentially shedding light on her priorities as she starts the job of leading the vast American intelligence community. If she would have removed the word 'radical,' she would have been more accurate in her description of orthodox Islam as the teachings are clear.

Here comes the disclaimer: not all Muslims are terrorists or anti-Semites; but most terrorists are Muslim and anti-Semites through generational teaching. 

While speaking with Fox News host Lara Trump, Gabbard dismissed the declaration made in 2021 by the useless and then-Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas that white supremacists pose the greatest national security threat to the United States. 

While difficult to pin down a precise percentage since not all white supremacists would admit to it, one such tracking of hate groups comes from the far-left Southern Poverty Law Center. They identified 165 active white nationalist groups in 2023, although membership estimates are unclear. However, older figures such a a 2018 claim on X suggested about 2,000 white supremacist groups. If we compare the U.S. population of about 330 million people, the fraction falls around 0.0006% and even if membership has since grown and doesn't count unaffiliated scumcrumpets, it's still very likely to fall under 0.01%.

Instead of pretending that it's white people who are the nation's biggest security threat, Gabbard asserted that Americans face a greater safety threat from “radical Islamist terrorism.”

“We look at the past four years of open borders, where we had tens of millions of people coming across our borders, many of whom we don’t know who they are or what their intentions are, very specifically the threat of radical Islamist terrorism ​​here within our country is higher than it’s ever been before, not only because of [former US President Joe] Biden’s open borders, but because of his and his administration’s fear of being called Islamophobes,” Gabbard said when asked what the chief threat is to the American people’s safety.

After the October 7, 2023 Arab massacre of Israelis, Gabbard's statement seems to be the only honest one we've been hearing.

If you would like to support my work you can Buy Me A Coffee and/or subscribe. Thank you.

Tweet

Tulsi rips Mittens a new one during hearing

Now that the House majority belongs to the GOP, they have a little clout and opened the select committee hearing on the weaponization of the DoJ and FBI.

Former Democrat Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard was one of the witnesses for the hearing, and minced no words about the corruption she has observed between Big Tech and the federal government and how they targeted her personally.

She recounted how she was once approached by a woman during the 2020 presidential campaign and was asked by he whether she was working for Vladimir Putin. Evidently, the woman got the misinformation from the words of Hillary Clinton who accused Gabbard of being "groomed by Putin.” 

Now we have Sen. Mitt Romney [RINO] spouting nearly the same accusation, claiming that she was spreading “treasonous lies” in response to some of her commentary on the conflict in Ukraine.

Treason is punishable by death. Tulsi Gabbard is an officer in the US military, risking her life for the country while Mittens has never served in the military a day in his life.

During the hearing, Gabbard was given an official platform to respond, and she ripped Romney a new one.You really ought to consider checking out the tweet below for a part of her statement about Romney:

Tulsi Gabbard calls out Mitt Romney for accusing her of treason. pic.twitter.com/IKHelwm0ki

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) February 9, 2023

These were her words:

"More recently, US senator Mitt Romney accused me of treason, a crime that is punishable by death under our laws. I challenged him to back this serious allegation up with evidence. What was this based on? There was no response, no explanation, no evidence, and certainly no apology.

"Now, these accusations are often shrugged off as “well hey, it’s politics, people say things about each other all the time.” But that may be easy for some of you to say, but for somebody who wears the uniform, this is serious, and it’s serious not only to me but to my fellow servicemembers and veterans, every one of us making a decision at some point in our lives to raise our right hand, prepared and volunteering to lay our life down for this country.

"What does that mean in reality? It means that before every deployment, we have to make peace in our own hearts with the possibility that we may not come home. It means writing letters to our loved ones, trying to find the words (end of clip)."

To speak of those of us who have served in the military and some who are currently serving, as Tulsi Gabbard is, Romney's words define him as a shitbird. [Marines know what I mean.] Calling someone a traitor because they don't agree with a foreign war that does not directly involve the USA, is disgusting, defamatory, and ridiculous.

Tulsi Gabbard put her money where her mouth is; Mitt Romney never did.

Romney should be impeached. Period. And I don't give a damn what party he is or what party she is. He is an execrable scumbag.

Tweet

Everything including Ukraine jet crash is Trump's fault

Everything is President Trump's fault. Yes, he has that much power and the world began when he came down the escalator.

He kills a terrorist, the Democrats take the terrorist's side. Iran shoots down a commercial airline either due to their gross incompetence or willful malevolence, but it's still Trump's fault because the media will do verbal calisthenics to twist the blame to him. It is truly disgusting and it bears credence to Trump calling them out.

Oh, the Democrats and the media [but I repeat myself] admit that Soleimani was "a bad dude," but he wasn't just bad and he wasn't a dude. He was a freaking terrorist who was responsible for no less than 600 American deaths, about 1,500 Iranian deaths, and tens of thousands of Muslim deaths throughout the Middle East.

Trump gets a "W" but the left tries to give him an "L."

Right after claims that an errant missile fired by the terrorist nation of Iran brought down a passenger jet earlier this week, some Democrats and media voices have appeared to make the case that President Trump shares in the blame for the death of 176 civilians.

Verbal calisthenics and twisted logic.

Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA) who has the intelligence of a wet wad of gum, pointedly laid the blame for the tragedy at Trump's feet, in an interview Thursday.

“If what is being projected is true, this is yet another example of collateral damage from the actions that have been taken in a provocative way by the president of the United States,” Speier told the Communist News Network.

Collateral damage would mean that the United States targeted Iran and inadvertently killed innocent civilians. The U.S. did no such thing. It was Iran's fault in total and to somehow try to blame Trump for this is not only ridiculous and illogical, it's downright unpatriotic and pro-Iranian. Speier is a moron.

Even Pete Buttigieg, the make-believe moderate, tried to convince the public that it was like a butterfly effect--that had Trump not ordered the killing of the terrorist (designated as such by the Obama administration and thus a legitimate target by Trump) Iran would not have retaliated and the passenger plane would not have been shot down.

And if auto makers didn't make vans, there would be no vans plowing into innocent pedestrians, or drunk drivers. That's exactly the same logic Mayor Pete is trying to get us to believe.

Even Tulsi Gabbard said similar garbage on Fox News, a former conservative media outlet.

I don't want to hear it from the left when a mass murderer like Soleimani is put down and prevented from killing more innocent people. This political maneuvering is horrible. Nobody on either side of the aisle voiced anything less than joy when Obama put down Osama bin Laden. As much as Obama was one of the worst presidents in American history, we conservatives had to tip our hats to him, even though it took him quite a lot of soul-searching before he allowed the killing.

Ask any family member who lost a loved one to Iran's military or proxies, anyone who lost a limb and whose life is changed forever, how they feel about the killing of this piece of s**t.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings.




Tweet

Tulsi Gabbard passes on next Dem debate

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) is refusing to participate in the next Democratic presidential debate even if she qualifies for it.

“For a number of reasons, I have decided not to attend the December 19th ‘debate’ — regardless of whether or not there are qualifying polls,” Gabbard tweeted on Monday. “I instead choose to spend that precious time directly meeting with and hearing from the people of New Hampshire and South Carolina.”

Some of the many reasons may have to do with the notion that Gabbard is thinking about running as an independent. If she does run thusly, it will likely hurt the Democrat party.

The Hill noted that Gabbard previously pledged to boycott the October presidential debate but did not honor her pledge and participated anyway.

At the time, she accused the Democratic National Committee (DNC) of “rigging” the 2020 race [like they did in 2016 against Bernie Sanders in favor of Hillary Clinton]. 

As a result of her honesty, leftists denounced Gabbard as a Trumpian asset, or perhaps a Russian stooge. They forgot to mention racist, bigot, Islamophobe and homophobe, which may have been a leftist oversight.

Presidential loser to Barack Obama and President Trump, Hillary Clinton even asserted with zero evidence that Russia is grooming Gabbard for a third-party run. Hillary is the deplorable she claims Trump supporters to be.

“I think they have got their eye on someone who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate. She is the favorite of the Russians,” the loser Clinton said. “They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far.”

And Clinton knows about sites and bots and BleachBit.

“That’s assuming Jill Stein will give it up, which she might not because she’s also a Russian asset. Yeah, she’s a Russian asset — I mean, totally,” she continued. “They know they can’t win without a third-party candidate. So I don’t know who it’s going to be, but I will guarantee you they will have a vigorous third-party challenge in the key states that they most needed.”

Gabbard immediately took to Twitter to blast Clinton as “the queen of warmongers,” but didn't mention how she is also a vile anti-woman sexist who attacked the female victims of her amoral husband.

“Great! Thank you [Hillary Clinton],” Gabbard said. “You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain.”

That is a lie! Hillary came out from behind a rock.

“From the day I announced my candidacy, there has been a concerted campaign to destroy my reputation. We wondered who was behind it and why,” Tulsi continued. [Tulsi means "basil leaf" in Hindi, which is considered a sacred leaf.]

“Now we know — it was always you, through your proxies and powerful allies in the corporate media and war machine, afraid of the threat I pose.”


Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.

Tweet

Gabbard: pro-Assad, anti-LGBT, anti-America

Believe it or not, the Democrat from Hawaii, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, has entered the 2020 presidential campaign and has about as much of a chance of getting nominated as a Haagen Dazs ice cream cone has dancing in hell. But what the heck, why not add your name to the list for the vanity of the fair in spite of the fact the media is basically ignoring her.

To Gabbard's discredit, she has become the lunch date of such suck-worthy tyrants and warlords and has raised the eyebrows of people who are aware of her behavior.

In 2017 she traveled to Armenia where she participated in a CODEL, basically a Congress-sanctioned opportunity for members to learn from a foreign people or nation in the lap of not so foreign luxury. Good or bad depends on the destination of the CODEL.

According to the Daily Wire, Gabbard's website mentions members of the "Artsakh" Parliament: 

"President Sargsyan, Prime Minister Karapetyan, distinguished members of the Ministry, representatives from Armenia's National Assembly, Americans of Armenian ancestry, members of the Artsakh Parliament…to identify areas of mutual interest and cooperation to strengthen the security, economic, and cultural relationships that bind our countries…"

Armenia is correctly known as a vassal nation of Russia, even after the dissolution of the U.S.S.R., and a close ally of Iran. Although Gabbard mentions members of the "Artsakh" Parliament, the author searched and found no nation by that name because there isn't a nation by that name.

Not a nation on the globe recognizes "Artsakh," not even Armenia. It is an Armenian occupied portion of neighboring Azerbaijan — one they have been at war over for more than twenty-five years. It seems that despite international condemnation and several U.N. resolutions, Armenia won’t leave.

Those men of whom Tulsi Gabbard speaks so highly were literally overthrown in April 2018. A mere few months after Gabbard lauded them as the too cool for school, they were gone.

Armenia now has a new leader, Nicol Pashinyan. He is nothing more than a sycophant in a long line of sycophants of the Kremlin. He is also besties with the mullahs in Tehran.

When the truth was exposed, so were these butchers, warlords, murders, thieves, and the men who kept Russia and Iran in charge of every aspect of the Armenian life and keeping the people poor and silent.

Gabbard's desire in hanging out with tyrants began in Syria. She paid a warm visit to Bashar al-Assad against a U.S. State Department advisory. The two shared lunch together.

As the Daily Wire reports:

When the war in Syria was at its height, operationally at full, the refugee crisis winding up to a humanitarian catastrophe and with American boots on the ground, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard took a jaunt to Syria and had tea and biscuits and plenty of face time with Bashar al-Assad. It was reputed that the poison gas-using tyrant and the member of the U.S. House of Representatives got along quite well and liked one another.

Rep. Gabbard still defends Assad to American reporters. Does she do this as a publicity stunt? Probably, now that she's running for the presidency in 2020.

Along with her history of attacking the LGBT community, it would make sense for the press to ask her real questions about her apparent anti-American behavior. Having served in the military does not excuse her anymore than it excused Lee Harvey Oswald who served in the U.S. Marine Corps.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Evolving for votes

Barack Obama once believed a marriage is between a man and a woman, but he evolved. He evolved so much that he even changed his definition of what is a man and what is a woman. Now that's some serious science-be-damned evolving. It even got him elected as president not once, but twice.

Kirsten Gillibrand used to have an "A" rating with the NRA but she discovered that guns, in and of themselves, are immoral. Now she has an "F" rating. Border walls are now also immoral and Gillibrand has finally evolved to that position and hopes nobody remembers her "blue dog Democrat" days. She's running for president in 2020 on the platform that she is a woman, but she will not be nominated--even Democrats aren't that stupid--I suspect. Oh wait, never mind.

Tulsi Gabbard and her dad, Mike, were

"Woo"

dead set against same sex marriage and she was very critical of homosexual behavior. Definitely no friend of the LBGTQsilentP community, Tulsi has finally evolved and even apologized for having a different opinion than her leftist colleagues. In fact, she no longer demands that the country's leaders call radical extremists by that or similar terms, like she did with former President Barack Hussein Obama. She fits neatly into some of the intersectional victimhood criteria that will help her in the primaries, but she will likely be "taken out" by the Democrats in the circular firing squad that's sure to form.

No longer driving an auto after drunk driving arrest

Bobbo O'Rourke [aka Robert; aka Beto; aka "Down in the Mouth O'Rourke"] has also made the necessary evolution to win votes. Where in the past, he voted along GOP lines 30 percent of the time, and was dead set against free college for all, now he has evolved and gone the other way. Bobbo finally knows that the border wall is the bearer of "imminent death" to all who come near it. Now he believes everyone should go to college for free [on our tax dollars] because that, and killing your unborn baby, is your right.

Kamala Harris is a different story. According to Vote Smart "Kamala Harris has refused to provide voters with positions on key issues covered by the 2016 Political Courage Test, despite repeated requests from Vote Smart and voters like you." She also tends to speak in tautological ways--spouting obvious things such as: " The American dream belongs to all of us." "I think I have every piece of music Bob Marley ever made." "If it's worth fighting for, it's a fight worth having." Brilliant stuff here.

Bobbo

She is also too much like Hillary Clinton: as likable as genital warts. But she has intersectional creds and the left tends to think in victimhood terms. Harris is a Jamaican-Indian and despite her sucking as California's AG, according to the former newspaper New York Times, she stands a chance at challenging Trump in 2020, that is, if people on the left don't care how much she sucked as California's attorney general.

Field of doofy dreamers

Perhaps political courage isn't only the failure to provide to the public your ideological beliefs, perhaps it's also having the courage to stick to those you knew were right when you first said them out loud before you decided to run for the highest office in the U.S.A.

Will 2019 be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint? Let's hope so, because politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet