Tulsi Gabbard Drops a Truth Bomb: Obama’s Russia Hoax Was a Slap in the Face to American Voters

The Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard just unloaded a haymaker on the Obama administration’s legacy of meddling. On Friday’s "Hannity," Gabbard didn’t mince words, accusing Barack Hussein Obama and his cronies of orchestrating the Russia collusion narrative to "subvert the American people’s will" in the 2016 election. I don't know what you think, but I believe it's kind of a big deal when a former president basically flips off voters who had the audacity of hope to pick Trump over Killery.

Gabbard, who’s apparently had enough of the Beltway’s nonsense, declassified a juicy stack of over 100 documents on Friday, laying bare what she calls "overwhelming evidence" of Obama’s team cooking up the Trump-Russia probe to kneecap the 45th president before he even got started. "It lays out, these over 100 documents that you're referencing, that I declassified and released, spells out in great detail exactly what happens when you have some of the most powerful people in our country directly leading at the helm, President Obama and his senior-most national security cabinet, James Comey, John Brennan, James Clapper, and Susan Rice and others, essentially making a very intentional decision to create this manufactured, politicized piece of intelligence with the objective of subverting the will of the American people," she told Hannity. 

Nuclear mic drop!

Let’s be real, this isn’t just some partisan food fight. Gabbard made it abundantly clear that this is about the "integrity and strength of our democratic republic." 

She’s not wrong. When the guy in the Oval Office and his posse of spooks allegedly decide to ignore the election results because they don’t like the outcome, that’s not democracy. That’s a temper tantrum with a security clearance. 

Gabbard claims Obama’s goal was to "not accept the decision of the American people" and use this "manufactured, politicized piece of intelligence" to fuel a "years-long coup against President Trump." And she’s got the receipts.

The fallout was a 'mere' $40 million Mueller investigation that dragged on like The Hundred Years War, congressional impeachments, endless smears against Trump and his family, and some of his team getting investigated, arrested, or jailed. 

Plus, let’s not forget the bonus prize: ratcheting up tensions with Russia because, apparently, we didn’t have enough problems. "The years-long Mueller investigation that cost taxpayers almost $40 million to congressional impeachments, endless smears and attacks against not only President Trump, but his family. He had senior members of his team who were investigated, some arrested and jailed. We had heightened and increased tensions between the United States and Russia. The list goes on and on about the consequences of President Obama and his senior cabinet members politicizing intelligence," Gabbard laid out. It’s like a greatest hits album of political malfeasance.

Fox News Digital reached out to Obama’s camp for comment, but I’m guessing they’re too busy polishing their halos to respond. They didn’t answer earlier calls about Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Rice, Lynch, or McCabe either. Shocker.

Gabbard’s not stopping at declassifying documents and calling out names. She’s tossing the whole pile to the Department of Justice for a closer look, because accountability isn’t just a buzzword, it’s "critical" to keeping faith in our republic. 

"I am referring all of these documents that we have found and uncovered, referring them to the Department of Justice for further investigation. Accountability and action; not just investigation, but action. Accountability has to take place. The American people's ability to have faith and trust in the integrity of our democratic republic is literally what's at stake and therefore the future of our ability to exist as the country that we know it. This accountability is critical to make sure that this never happens again," Gabbard said. 

And then there’s the Steele dossier, that sketchy piece of fan fiction the left treated like the Koran. Gabbard didn’t hold back, claiming Obama "directed" its creation, even though the intelligence community itself was screaming, "This is not credible and should not be used at all." 

Her words: "The Steele dossier was used in this manufactured assessment that President Obama directed to be created along with many other pieces of intelligence that the intelligence community itself, for months leading up to the election, said, 'This is not credible and should not be used at all.'" Yet, they ran with it anyway. Because who needs credibility when you have an agenda?

On Saturday’s "Fox and Friends," Gabbard doubled down, calling the Obama administration’s antics a "treasonous conspiracy" against Trump. "No one, no matter who they are, no matter how high up they are or how powerful they may be, no matter who the intelligence officials or professionals were, who were a part of this treasonous conspiracy, there must be accountability," she asserted. Treasonous. Conspiracy. Gabbard’s not here to play nice, and honestly, why should she? If her claims hold water, this is the kind of thing that makes you wonder if the cesspool too deep to drain.

Hey amazing readers! If you enjoy my content, please consider supporting Brain Flushings. A quick coffee donation via Buy Me a Coffee fuels late-night writing sessions and fresh ideas. Every sip—er, dollar—helps me create more of the posts you enjoy. Join the crew, toss in a coffee, and let’s keep the good vibes brewing! 

Tweet

Tom Homan 'disgusted' by theshowboating Dem Senator's trip to bring home alleged MS-13 gangbanger

Border czar Tom Homan came out swinging Wednesday, unloading on Democrats while Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen jetted off to El Salvador, desperate to drag back suspected MS-13 thug Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Van Hollen’s crying foul, claiming the guy was “wrongfully abducted” from the U.S. Homan? He’s not buying that sob story for a second.

“He wasn’t abducted. He’s an MS-13 gang member, classified as a terrorist that was removed from this country, so we got rid of a dangerous person,” Homan told Fox & Friends, probably while sipping coffee strong enough to wake a coma patient. “An El Salvadoran national was returned to the country of El Salvador, so he’s home.”

Homan’s doubling down, channeling the Trump crew’s line that Abrego Garcia’s a “public safety threat.” His deportation? “Exactly what should have happened,” Homan says, ready to throw hands with anyone trying to sneak this guy back into the States.

But what’s got Homan’s blood boiling is Van Hollen playing superhero for an MS-13 suspect while illegal immigrant crime festers back home—yep, even in Maryland. “I’m disgusted,” Homan fumed, pointing to the murder of Rachel Morin. “Listen to the testimony and listen to the mother on ‘Hannity’ last night. If you’re not human... your heart wasn’t broken. It [happened] in his state, but rather than taking care of the constituents in his state, the victims of illegal crime in his state, he’s going to run to El Salvador to protect MS-13 terrorists.”

This drama’s heating up after President Trump’s Oval Office powwow with El Salvador’s Nayib Bukele, and Van Hollen’s begging for his own face-to-face with the Salvadoran prez to spring Abrego Garcia. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court’s stirring the pot, upholding an order last week that’s got the government scrambling to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from El Salvador’s clutches and treat his case like he never left. Good luck with that.

Democrats and Abrego Garcia’s lawyer are pushing back, swearing up and down he’s not tied to the gang. But Trump’s team and Bukele? They’re on the same page, saying there’s no way this guy’s waltzing back into the U.S. Bukele put it bluntly: “How can I smuggle a terrorist into the U.S.? I don’t have the power to return him to the United States.” Translation: Nice try, but no dice.

Loving the blog? Toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee if you’re feeling generous – it’s like a high-five with caffeine! No pressure.

Tweet

Sr. Louis Couple who defended themselves have rifle seized during police search

They're coming for your businesses and they're coming for your Second Amendment right to defend yourself from bodily harm. They are organizations known as Antifa, "Expect Us," and the Democrat Party.

Authorities in St. Louis executed a search warrant Friday evening at the home of Mark and Patricia McCloskey. The couple, both attorneys, took up arms and defended their home from rioters and protesters last month, but now the law is coming for them.

Police searched their home and seized the rifle that Mark McCloskey was shown holding during the June 28 incident, KSDK-TV of St. Louis reported, citing information from a source.

The pistol that Patricia McCloskey held during the June confrontation was already in the possession of the couple’s attorney, the outlet reported.

There is no indication that either of the McCloskeys were arrested or if they were charged with a crime, but the idea they did anything wrong, as opposed to the visual evidence that they were merely defending themselves against an unruly crowd that had already broken down the private gate of their community, is totally ludicrous.

On Monday, the McCloskeys appeared on Fox News’ “Hannity” and explained that protesters returned to their neighborhood last Friday.  They were told in advance the mob was coming and hired a private security company to protect their residence since the police were not going to be involved.

Last week’s protest was loud but non-violent, the homeowner said.

In the June 28th incident, Patricia McCloskey said, they was startled just before dinnertime when “300 to 500 people” entered the gated community where they live.

"[They said] that they were going to kill us," Patricia McCloskey told Hannity.
"They were going to come in there. They were going to burn down the house. They were going to be living in our house after I was dead, and they were pointing to different rooms and said, 'That’s going to be my bedroom and that’s going to be the living room and I’m going to be taking a shower in that room’.”"

That's how Communism works.

The protesters even threatened to harm their dog, which was outside the home at the time.

The protesters claimed they were passing the McCloskeys' home while heading toward the home of Mayor Lyda Krewson, to demonstrate there, which is a lie because the mayor doesn't live there, the McCloskeys explained.

Soon after the June incident, Kimberly Gardner, circuit attorney in St. Louis, announced that her office and the St. Louis Police Department would be conducting an investigation into the McCloskeys’ use of firearms.

Had it been "Louisville Sluggers" that were brandished by the couple to protect themselves, rather than an AR15 and handgun, there would be no investigation, and possibly no McCloskeys.

The couple’s attorney, Albert Watkins, said in a statement that the McCloskeys didn't arm themselves until after they began feeling threatened [from the threats that were made on their lives and the life of their dog].

"My clients didn't sit on their front stoop with guns. ... No firearms were on them at the time that they, were, as property owners standing in front of their home," he said. "It was not until they basically were in a position of seeing and observing violence, recklessness, lawbreaking, and knowing that the police were not going to be doing anything."

Rather than investigating the McCloskeys, why aren't the authorities being investigated by unbiased outside authorities?

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Pelosi wants Trump defense team disbarred because they disagree with her

House Leader Nancy "Hands of Fury" Pelosi claims that President Trump "cannot be acquitted" because the Republicans in the Senate did not help her Party by calling witnesses the House did not call to appear.

On Thursday, when it became obvious that the Democrats had as much chance of impeaching the president as Joe Biden has at being able to keep his hands in his pockets, Speaker Pelosi made the bizarre claim, in words and flying hands, that President Trump "cannot be acquitted," because the Senate trial lacks the witness testimony and documents [the Democrats should have subpoenaed in the House].

The San Francisco [where homelessness is considered a status symbol] Democrat attacked President Trump's impeachment defense team. Because they did their jobs, Pelosi said they've "disgraced themselves." Technically, had they not done their jobs they would have disgraced their profession. But Speaker Pelosi even suggested that they deserve disbarment over their trial remarks.

The comments came hours before Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN), said he would not back efforts by Democrats to have witnesses testify at the Senate trial – all but sealing an appropriate acquittal for Trump, who is his own worst legal client.

Pelosi, who appears to be showing signs of senile dementia, challenged whether that acquittal would be valid, in remarks that seemed a bid to undermine any Trump claim of victory.

If an acquittal is invalid, then so is the impeachment. You can't have it both ways, but that's how the Democrats operate.

"He will not be acquitted," Pelosi insanely said during her weekly news conference, according to Politico. “You cannot be acquitted if you don’t have a trial. You don’t have a trial if you don’t have witnesses and documentation and all of that. Does the president know right from wrong? I don't think so.”

A Poli Grip fail

Of course, you can be acquitted even if you don't have a trial--Nancy is trying to blow smoke up into the nether regions of her Party, because they tend to believe what they want to believe.

Democrats have been seeking to have former national security adviser John Bolton, and possibly others, testify at the trial. But they don't want Hunter Biden to testify because he is too relevant as the catalyst of this entire charade.

Bolton, who was fired in September, is reportedly willing to provide testimony that could bolster the Democrats’ arguments that Trump abused his power by seeking a quid-pro-quo deal with Ukraine.

It is probable that Trump did seek a quid pro quo with Ukraine but what he did was not impeachable--he just should have admitted it in the first place. He could have said, "Sure, I told Ukraine to investigate Burisma back in 2016. I was even concerned the Bidens were doing something untoward. At least I didn't hire someone to get fake information from Russia to hurt my chances in 2016 like Hillary did. Sue me."

Anyway, Pelosi and her kinetic dentures made combative comments about Trump’s legal team.

"I don't know how they can retain their lawyer status, in the comments that they're making," Pelosi, turning her back and reaching for her Poli Grip, told reporters. "I don't think they made the case. I think they disgraced themselves terribly in terms of their violation of what our Constitution is about and what a president's behavior should be."

Pelosi also accused other Trump allies of attempting “to dismantle the Constitution” in order to shield the president from conviction and removal from office over two articles of impeachment that the Democrat-controlled House approved in December.

Pelosi talking about the U.S. Constitution--as if the Democrats have been religiously abiding by it--is almost as funny as Eric Swalwell farting on camera with Chris Matthews and then pretending it was his coffee cup.

“Some of them are even lawyers,” Pelosi said. “Imagine that you would say — ever, of any president, no matter who he or she is or whatever party -- if the president thinks that his or her presidency ... is good for the country, then any action is justified — including encouraging a foreign government to have an impact on our elections."

She purposely misinterpreted Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz's explanation by suggesting that a president can break any law as long as he says it's for the good of the nation. He never said, nor implied that, he said this: “If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment.” It does not imply that the "something" can be illegal, but the left would like you to believe that this is what he meant.

She and her frenetic hands and moving dentures went on and cited the Founders, as if they would have approved of the Democrats' political impeachment hoax.

When Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NJ) was asked whether or not Hillary Clinton would have been impeached if she had won the election, due to her using the Russian-generated Steele dossier to hurt Trump's chances, he claimed that it was not impeachable because she paid for it.

So if Trump gave Zelenski a dollar, all would be fine with the Democrats.

Yeah sure.

After Dershowitz was wrongfully attacked, he pushed back on Twitter:

“I did not say or imply that a candidate could do anything to reassure his reelection, only that seeking help in an election is not necessarily corrupt, citing the Lincoln and Obama examples. Critics have an obligation to respond to what I said, not to create straw men to attack.”

Dershowitz elaborated further during an appearance on Fox News’ “Hannity.”

"The point I was making was about the senators," Dershowitz said on "Hannity." "What I said [was] if you have mixed motives if you are in the public interest and you're trying to help the public, but you're also trying to get re-elected, according to [Rep. Adam] Schiff and [Rep. Jerry] Nadler, that's a crime.

President Trump and other Republicans argued that Pelosi slowed down the impeachment process, at least in part, because she realized the Democrats’ chances of winning a conviction of Trump in the Senate to be weak because it was without merit.

But all is well in the nation today and by Wednesday, all should be even better when the acquittal is likely to be given.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings.





Tweet

The 'collusion delusion' destroys Rachel Maddow's ratings

MSNBC's biggest loser turns out to be Rachel Maddow [aka Madcow] now that the Russia probe has determined that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Special Counsel Robert Mueller officially concluded his investigation into the alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Maddow had seen a rating surge since President Trump took office, offering extensive coverage on the Russia investigation for the past two years with her snarky take on Trump-related gossip she made up off the top of her vacuous head. Her Trump-hating viewers ate that crap up.

However, her viewership has been circling the bowl since Mueller handed his report to the Department of Justice last Friday and the Sunday’s release of Attorney General Bill Barr’s letter summarizing the report that concluded that there was no collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. She even appeared to be crying after the summary came out.

“The Rachel Maddow Show” saw an average 13 percent decrease in viewership comparing her ratings Monday through Wednesday this week versus last week — Maddow lost nearly a whopping 500,000 viewers on Monday’s show following the release of Barr’s letter compared to her previous Monday show. She also saw a 15 percent decrease in the 25-52 demo audience.

This lends hope to the notion that not everyone on the left is too stupid to realize Maddow and the other networks lied to them.

The MSNBC primetime lineup suffered as a whole this week, averaging 2.46 million viewers versus the 2.83 million from last week.

President Trump simply couldn't help himself as he took to Twitter on Thursday morning to mock MSNBC and CNN for their ratings struggle this week.

“Wow, ratings for ‘Morning Joe,’ which were really bad in the first place, just ‘tanked’ with the release of the Mueller report. Likewise, other shows on MSNBC and CNN have gone down by as much as 50%. Just shows, Fake News never wins!” Trump tweeted.

However, Fox News Channel has seen a substantial ratings increase since the findings of the Mueller report summary were made public.

“Hannity” received over 4 million viewers on Monday, which was more than 1 million additional viewers than the previous Monday. Hannity has successfully held onto his momentum, earning 4.3 million viewers on Wednesday night, when he also received a 32 percent increase in the demo from last week.

FNC’s other primetime hosts, Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham, have also benefited since the Mueller report was issued, averaging a 25 percent increase in viewership during primetime this week. They averaged 3.58 million viewers versus last week’s average of 2.72 million viewers.

Maybe the country is finally getting it, after all. Maybe they understand that the media hate Trump more than they love the country and would like to see him, and thus the nation, fail.

Sad!


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.






Tweet

Charlotte continues to riot

Charlotte, N.C. -- The scene is ugly with angry people who appear to care more about creating anarchy and looting than the actually protesting for a cause. These are not protests--when windows are smashed and businesses are looted, that's a riot.

And so we have another night in Charlotte where the mob is out of hand. A white man beaten and dragged by the miscreants and the brother of Keith Lamont Scott having his 15 minutes of fame as he tells the media that all white people are "devils." 

I understand his pain, but I condemn his racism. 

We've reached a point where it's acceptable for blacks to express racism and for liberals to condemn conservatives with more anger directed at them for wanting better vetting for refugees than they express over terror attacks and rapes by those refugees.

Officials in Charlotte appealed for calm and it did little to stop the rioting. Police made 44 arrests and one civilian was shot and later died. Police say it was a rioter who shot him and the rioters say it was a cop.

A man identified as Scott's brother said, "Just know that all white people are f****** devils, all white cops are f****** devils and white people."

But the cop who shot Scott was also black.

Al Race-Baiter Sharpton said that black cops are different toward black people, implying that black cops are racist against black people. Sharpton is about as 'sharp' as a puddle.  

North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory declared a state of emergency and called in the National Guard after the Charlotte police chief called for additional help.

Sean Hannity was so concerned about the rioting that he only devoted 47 minutes of his show to praise Donald Trump.

"The events that we saw last night are not the Charlotte I know and love," said Mayor Jennifer Roberts at a news conference. "They are not reflective of our community, of the deep-seated traditions we have of collaboration and peace." She called for a "full, transparent investigation" as opposed to a Comey-style FBI type of investigation.

Police Chief Kerr Putney, an African-American, would not commit to releasing video of the incident to the public, which is probably wise.

The shooting that took place in Tulsa, OK was a different scenario: a white, female cop shot an unarmed black man and now she is up on charges. The Charlotte shooting allegedly involved an armed man. But when it suits their agenda, groups like Black Lives Matter and the New Black Panthers lump them in together to give them an excuse to riot, loot and harm innocent people.

The country is on the road to perdition if things don't change.


Tweet

Trump to deport 'criminal illegal immigrants' within one hour after inauguration

If Donald Trump is elected president, he vowed Saturday to deport "criminal illegal immigrants . . . within one hour" after his inauguration. Not all criminal illegal immigrants, of course, just those that get caught in the national dragnet that will rid the country of these blights on society.

His Iowa speech stating this came on the heels of accusations claiming he backed down on this mainstay issue, an issue used to appeal to undecided general election voters and other low-information folks who actually think Hillary Clinton is honest and a true feminist.

Trump appeared on Fox News' "Hannity and the Donald" Tuesday night, while many TV viewers, tired of Trump's sycophant, watched "Border Security" or "Survivor's Remorse." Those who 'bit the bullet' heard Trump tell an Austin, Texas town hall filled with people shouting, "Lock her up . . . lock her up . . . " that he was open to "softening" current immigration laws.

"There could certainly be a softening because we're not looking to hurt people," [as long as they don't make trouble at his rallies] Trump told the audience. "We want to follow the laws, you know, we have very strong laws in this country. And you know Bush, and even Obama, sends people back. Now we can be more aggressive on that but we want to follow the laws," he said, referring to himself in the plural as most politicians often do.

But by Saturday, enough time went by for Trump to have second thoughts. He said the media had "missed the whole point on immigration . . . They take phrases and statements, chop them up, take them out of context and discuss them for days."

What he didn't mention was that the press doesn't do that with Hillary because they're in the bag for her. He missed another opportunity to appeal to undecided voters. He needs to sharpen his sword, I believe.

Trump said that he was coming up with an "exit-entry tracking system to ensure those who overstay their visas, that they're quickly removed." Fox News pointed out that this proposal echoed the language of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who is now advising him. 

However, Fox's Hannity pointed out that Donald Trump is "the most intelligent individual that [I] had the privilege of working for with. If he said he will do it, he will do it .  .  . thoughts."

Trump also said "My priority is the well-being of 300 million American citizens, including millions of Hispanic citizens and legal residents who want a secure border, and I mean secure." At this point he reinforced his promise to build a wall across the southern border and have Mexico pay for it.

During the primary race, Trump created a lot of havoc when he vowed to use a "deportation force" to round up and deport millions of illegal immigrants. But on "Hannity and the Donald" this week, Trump said that he would now be willing to "work with" illegal immigrants (but not literally "work with them" at their low-paying jobs).

"They'll pay back-taxes, they have to pay taxes, there's no amnesty, as such, there's no amnesty, but we work with them," Trump said in that repetitious way he has to make certain everyone has heard him say the same thing two to three times per sentence. 

This is how he reassures us that he's telling the truth.

Trump's campaign has cancelled scheduled speeches that were set to detail his immigration policy. He says that he will deliver a speech on that subject with the next two weeks if he feels like it.


Trump missed a great opportunity of reaching out to independent and undecided voters during the Olympic Games. Perhaps he's still angry at NBC, but he should have placed several ads a day during the games since all political persuasions watch the Olympics. He already has his core wrapped up, now he needs to go for the rest--but he isn't doing that very well.

Hillary Clinton certainly didn't let the opportunity go by. She advertised at least twice a day during the games.

I'm definitely voting for Trump, not because he's the best person for the job, but because he's running against the most dishonest, vile and incompetent person in politics. 



Tweet

Fox on Fox on Trump

Sean Hannity, an expert in martial arts, an excellent marksman, and a man deeply concerned about the fact that Saudi women can't drive and if raped, need four male witnesses, interviewed former Mexican President Vicente Fox on Fox News. 

Fox had recently used the "f" word when discussing GOP frontrunner Donald Trump who vowed to have Mexico build and pay for "the wall" along the US-Mexican border Trump proposed.

In this most recent interview, on FNC's "Hannity," Fox said that Trump believed in "white supremacy."

I don't know how he "knows" that but I don't believe him for one minute.

As the interview was coming to an end, with the former Mexican president aggravated by Hannity's being in the tank for the Donald, Fox said: 

"We were going to talk about Trump. He is a false prophet [like some other so-called prophet I knew]. He is going to take the nation to the desert. He doesn't understand about creating jobs. He only lies and lies and lies and uses whatever is convenient for him without any attention to facts. That's why I say he's an ego-eccentric, only looking for himself, not for the rest. He believes in the white supremacy of the white. That is Hitler . . . I say way up America from this Republican nightmare."

Obviously a guy like Fox, a guy who looked the other way as his country went to hell with itself over drugs and drug-related terrorism, should not hold much weight when he voices his opinion.

You may or may not like Trump, but some people shouldn't be taken seriously, and Vicente Fox is the poster-slug for hypocrisy.




Tweet

U.S. at the Ready

We have 4 warships ready to go at Syria and we're one step closer to striking at their government in response to the most recent chemical weapons attack on Syria's civilian population. Vladimir Putinm Russia's version of Obama,  is thumbing his nose and bare chest at our smiling leader, agreeing that chemical weapons were used, but not agreeing with who may have used them. Since Obama ditched plans to discuss options regarding Syria, it has become very clear that our relationship with Russia is similar to a trial separation with a couple who aren't getting along.