Boo-Hoo Boehner's Biting Words

John "Man Tan" Boehner, the former House speaker, finally got involved with the presidential campaigning by speaking out against Ted Cruz while blowing kisses to Donald Trump. Boehner went after Cruz referring to him as "Lucifer in the flesh" and a "miserable son of a bitch."

Boehner reportedly doesn't even know Ted Cruz's mother and probably should not have used that term as it offends mothers everywhere this close to Mother's Day.

But Boehner is never one to mince words or emotions. Like when he cried when meeting Pope Francis in Washington D.C. "What a day," Boehner said. "What a moment for our country . . . the Holy Father's visit is surely a blessing for all of us." Sniff, sniff.

Or when he cried in an interview with Golf Channel saying, "I want to make sure that every kid had the same chances that I did."

Or when he cried at Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' resignation ceremony in 2012. 

Or when he cried when Nancy Pelosi handed him the House gavel in 2011.

Or when he cried at the Ohio State University commencement address in June 2011.

But Boehner has put away the tears and has gotten off the tanning bed to once again get involved in politics. I missed him so much, it brought tears to my eyes.

Boehner said that he's played golf with Donald Trump and said that he and the Donald are "texting buddies." He added that while Ohio Gov. John "Karate Chop" Kasich "requires more effort," he says they are friends "and I love him."

He and Kasich are planning to adopt after the campaign "once JK settles down."

Boehner said "I have Democratic friends and Republican friends. I get along with almost everyone, but I have never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life," he told the Stanford Daily.

While not endorsing Trump [or gay marriage] Boehner said he would vote for him, but not Cruz. He would rather have a lying felon incompetent woman or socialist in the White House than that guy with the world's most "punchable face."

Cruz fired back on Twitter: "Tell me again who will stand up to Washington? Trump, who's Boehner's 'texting and golfing buddy,' or Carly & me?

Cruz also said that he "never worked" with Boehner implying that Boehner is as honest as his perennial tan. "Boehner's comments reveal everything that is wrong with Washington," Cruz said.

Paul Ryan, Boo-Hoo Boehner's successor, said that he doesn't share the same views about Cruz.

Calling someone "Lucifer" is like calling everyone you don't like "Hitler." It doesn't ring true and it dilutes the truth as to the evil of the two.

But if Boehner wants to act like a damn Hitler, that's his business.

BTW: Please excuse the spelling typo of Boehner's name in the original posting--it shows up on Flipboard and cannot be deleted and corrected once it's posted.



Tweet

The ayatollah makes more demands--Kerry sweats his pants

The ayatollah of Iran earlier this month demanded that sanctions be lifted entirely, not simply be suspended as the nuke deal stipulates. This is cause for concern for the Obama administration, but to be fair, they will think of a way to give Iran what they want and make it look like they didn't.

A senior Khamenei lackey reiterated the demand again this weekend, just before potential sideline talks at the UN General Assembly. And the lucky lackey will get John Kerry in several days as he comes to New York to meet with his Iranian counterpart, Foreign Minister Mohammad (you saw that coming) Javad Zarif.

It isn't enough for Iran to inspect themselves on the "honor system" and provide their own soil samples, get 24 day notice when Islamic inspectors are coming, allow or deny them, and ensure no American inspectors can visit the sites where the bombs are being prepared, no, they want the USA to lift all sanctions NOW!

Allowing Iran to use the "honor system" to inspect themselves is like allowing a drug addict to watch the pharmacy while the owner goes across the street for a few cold ones.

The fact that Congress has allowed this out of control president of ours to bypass them by making it an agreement rather than a treaty with Iran is unconscionable. No wonder a majority of conservatives don't trust Congress or politicians in general, and people like Donald Trump is leading in the poles. 


With John "Man-Tan" Boehner and Mitch "The Turtle" McConnell leading the GOP and having promised change that never came, we have a Republican party that's as useful as a rope shooting pool, and just as impotent.

And with John "The Gigolo" Kerry as our front man making the deal, I can see him fold like a cheap lawn chair in a wind storm.



Tweet

Libs Above the Law

According to Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times, it seems that Lois Lerner is not going to be prosecuted for Contempt of Congress in spite of her contempt of Congress. The so-called Obama  administration informed House Speaker John Boehner of the news explaining to the sometimes tearful Speaker that Lerner did not waive her Fifth Amendment rights which would have compelled her to answer questions that would have definitely incriminated her.

But dude, that's ancient history anyway. What was it, like two years ago? You need to move on [dot org]. 

Lois, who gave up a hair modeling career with Alberto VO5, is still not out of the woods legally as she is still under scrutiny.

"We are gratified but not surprised by today's news," Ms. Lerner's high taxpayer priced lawyer, William W. Taylor III, said. "Anyone who takes a serious and impartial look at this issue would conclude that Ms. Lerner did not waive her Fifth Amendment rights. It is unfortunate that the majority party in the House put politics before a citizen's Constitutional rights," the sleazeball added.

It's a shame that a public servant put politics before duty and used her Constitutional rights to get away with unlawful behavior. Hey, isn't that what Islamic organizations like CAIR do? Anyone who isn't mentally married to the mainstream media and knows the whole story will see through Taylor III balderdash. Perhaps he's correct about her Constitutional rights, but he absolutely knows  that he's defending a scumcrumpet in Lois Lerner.

I give credit to the six Democrats who sided with morals and ethics and refused to tow the party line and voted along the House Oversight Committee's decision to hold her in contempt. This came after her May 2013 appearance in front of the committee when she made a statement proclaiming her innocence but then refused to answer their questions to defend her claim.

It seems that she wants to have it both ways: to make a statement about her innocence, but then refuse to answer to that statement. She's an Obama Democrat so it worked.

Hillary appears to be on the same path with the Select Congressional Committee on Benghazi. She dumped her emails and doesn't worry about the repercussions. She said that she dumped only the personal emails about Chelsea's wedding and yoga plans but gave all government emails up.

Who sends over 30,000 personal emails and then dumps them, especially those of important family history? You save those emails and you immediately dump those that would get you in trouble.

Like Lois and Hillary, and like many liberals who aren't very smart, they don't realize that conservatives see through their obfuscating ploys. 


The game should be over for them, but it never is.



Tweet

ISIS ISIL IS Strategy Meeting: What Should We Do, What Should We Call Them?

As I write this, president Obama, Mitch McConnell, John Boehner and Nancy Pelosi are meeting in the Oval Office and the president is even wearing a tie. They are there to discuss strategies involving ISIS or ISIL or IS. If they cannot decide what to call them, how will they decide on ways to destroy them? Or do they really want to destroy them?

I can imagine Nancy Pelosi will say something to the effect: "We have to wait for them to attack, so we can . . . know what to do."

Harry Reid will likely have a  different take on strategy. I can hear his remark: "If it wasn't for the GOP and their inability to get things done, this would have never happened. It's all their fault and we should send them to fight ISIL."

John Boehner might say to the president: "We have to stop making this a political issue and look at it for what it is, Mr. President. This is war and you will uh-have to blow those ahbastards . . . up."

President Obama will respond, perhaps with: "I don't want to hear what we have to do. I want to hear what we are definitely not going to do. What we have to do is obvious--we have to tell the American public what we're not going to do."

And finally, the White House Press Secretary Josh "I'm Being" Earnest will tell the public before Obama makes his speech tomorrow: "President Obama (peace be upon him) will make his case based upon what is best for the American public and the Democratic party."

Mitch McConnell will just listen and continue looking a bit like Myrtle the Turtle.

We shall see our grand strategy tomorrow night at 9:00 p.m. Ten bucks says it'll be mainly political.


Tweet

Obama Scares Crap Out of Putin--Wait

President Where's Waldo has given a clear warning to Russia and the Moscow-backed Ukrainian separatists on Thursday that they better not mess with the crash site of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17. The commercial jet was shot down over rebel territory with 298 people on board. There were no survivors.

Obama spoke with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko by phone and said the US would offer "all possible assistance immediately." According to the White House summary of the call, Poroshenko welcomed the help of international investigators.

Obama, in his "Captain Obvious" pedantic mode said that all evidence of the crash must remain in place on the territory of Ukraine until international  investigators are able to examine all aspects of the tragedy. He obviously learned that on TV where he gets most of his information. He gave a full 40 seconds of his speech to the incident.

It was learned that Vladimir Putin cancelled his bear hunting/fishing trip in the Ural Mountains out of fear that Obama might be serious this time. He plans to cordon off the 10 mile area using American-built fencing that was originally slated to seal of the Southern US border, so that looters and other miscreants "stay the hell away." He said that he got a "good deal" on the fencing.

After Obama's stern warning (we are still trying to discover who this guy Stern is, by the way) he flew to New York City, but prior to that, he stopped in Wilmington, Delaware for a leftist event where he attacked the GOP over infrastructure funding. It seems that Obama has a peculiar way of uniting the country.

While he screwed around and avoided catastrophic world events in order to fund raise, the White House joked that he is working hard behind the scenes to address the crisis. Yes, they said "crisis" as if there was only one crisis taking place in the world. 

Perhaps Obama needs to watch more TV and do less fund raising.

Sen. John McCain (R) said that the United States should know what happened "within hours" and our response should be "within minutes," where we move to arm Ukrainian government forces if the separatists were guilty of shooting down the jet.

Republican House Speaker John Boehner said that we should wait and see what actually happened to MH17. "Many innocents were killed today. It is horrifying, and we await the facts. Right now, we should all take a moment to reflect, count our blessing, and convey our prayers to the loved ones of the victims."

James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, merely scratched his head and said nothing of significance or fact.



Tweet

Benghazi: Bumps in the Road

Now that John Boehner (R-OH) has finally caved to GOP pressure and decided to have a House Select Committee investigate what really happened at Benghazi on September 11, 2012, the press is finally asking questions to Jay "Con" Carney. Of course, Carney is answering those questions the way he does (when Fox News asks them) by avoiding an answer or lying through an arrogant smirk.

It appears the Democrats are afraid to defend Obama et al, and some have even suggested boycotting the committee, like they often boycott things such as the truth. 

To boycott the committee would be "terribly arrogant" and "wrong," said Rep. Peter King (R-NY). 

But Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) thinks boycotting the committee would be a way to remove all credibility and discredit the investigation, thereby relegating it to a witch hunt. He believes a committee investigation would be a "colossal waste of time," just like he might have thought sending help to the four Americans fighting for their lives would have also been a colossal waste of time.

It seems perplexing that even Democrats, for however unpatriotic, uncaring and uninformed they are, seem totally uninterested in getting to the truth about Benghazi. You would think that they would have at least some doubts about the video, and why no help was sent to the compound when it was under attack.

But let's face it, the truth is hardly more than an afterthought with liberals.

Some of the questions the committee should get answered are:

1. Where did Susan Rice get the idea to blame the video? Was she told directly or was it merely the e-mail from Ben Rhodes?

2. Several days later Hillary Clinton blamed the video, and later still told the families of the dead that the person who made the video will be punished. From whom did she get the talking point of the video?

3. What is the timeline for Obama from the moment the attack started to the next day?

4. Where did Ben Rhodes get the talking points?

5. Why was the "smoking gun" e-mail redacted the first time it was produced but not so when it was demanded via court order? What were they trying to hide?

6. Why did President Obama say it was clear that the attack on Ukrainian forces was obviously not spontaneous, based on the weaponry and militia-like precision used by the militants, but it wasn't obvious  that the Benghazi attack, which also used sophisticated weaponry and militia-like precision, was not spontaneous?

7. If the attack had occurred during a presidential visit to the Benghazi compound, what efforts would have been made by the military to save Obama's life? Why was it different for the 4 men who died there?

There are more questions that need to be asked; these are but a few that come to mind. If you have questions of your own that you'd like to express, please feel free to comment.

In my latest novel, a New York reporter is taken hostage by terrorists. If POTUS refuses to release 3 Gitmo jihadists, the reporter will die in 24 hours—they will behead him and show it on the Internet. There is only one way out but the clock is ticking . . .

Jihad Joe: a Novel  Create Space soft cover book edition

Jihad Joe see it here e-book version

Tweet

U.S. at the Ready

We have 4 warships ready to go at Syria and we're one step closer to striking at their government in response to the most recent chemical weapons attack on Syria's civilian population. Vladimir Putinm Russia's version of Obama,  is thumbing his nose and bare chest at our smiling leader, agreeing that chemical weapons were used, but not agreeing with who may have used them. Since Obama ditched plans to discuss options regarding Syria, it has become very clear that our relationship with Russia is similar to a trial separation with a couple who aren't getting along.