According to Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times, it seems that Lois Lerner is not going to be prosecuted for Contempt of Congress in spite of her contempt of Congress. The so-called Obama administration informed House Speaker John Boehner of the news explaining to the sometimes tearful Speaker that Lerner did not waive her Fifth Amendment rights which would have compelled her to answer questions that would have definitely incriminated her.
But dude, that's ancient history anyway. What was it, like two years ago? You need to move on [dot org].
Lois, who gave up a hair modeling career with Alberto VO5, is still not out of the woods legally as she is still under scrutiny.
"We are gratified but not surprised by today's news," Ms. Lerner's high taxpayer priced lawyer, William W. Taylor III, said. "Anyone who takes a serious and impartial look at this issue would conclude that Ms. Lerner did not waive her Fifth Amendment rights. It is unfortunate that the majority party in the House put politics before a citizen's Constitutional rights," the sleazeball added.
It's a shame that a public servant put politics before duty and used her Constitutional rights to get away with unlawful behavior. Hey, isn't that what Islamic organizations like CAIR do? Anyone who isn't mentally married to the mainstream media and knows the whole story will see through Taylor III balderdash. Perhaps he's correct about her Constitutional rights, but he absolutely knows that he's defending a scumcrumpet in Lois Lerner.
I give credit to the six Democrats who sided with morals and ethics and refused to tow the party line and voted along the House Oversight Committee's decision to hold her in contempt. This came after her May 2013 appearance in front of the committee when she made a statement proclaiming her innocence but then refused to answer their questions to defend her claim.
It seems that she wants to have it both ways: to make a statement about her innocence, but then refuse to answer to that statement. She's an Obama Democrat so it worked.
Hillary appears to be on the same path with the Select Congressional Committee on Benghazi. She dumped her emails and doesn't worry about the repercussions. She said that she dumped only the personal emails about Chelsea's wedding and yoga plans but gave all government emails up.
Who sends over 30,000 personal emails and then dumps them, especially those of important family history? You save those emails and you immediately dump those that would get you in trouble.
Like Lois and Hillary, and like many liberals who aren't very smart, they don't realize that conservatives see through their obfuscating ploys.
The game should be over for them, but it never is.
Tweet
But dude, that's ancient history anyway. What was it, like two years ago? You need to move on [dot org].
Lois, who gave up a hair modeling career with Alberto VO5, is still not out of the woods legally as she is still under scrutiny.
"We are gratified but not surprised by today's news," Ms. Lerner's high taxpayer priced lawyer, William W. Taylor III, said. "Anyone who takes a serious and impartial look at this issue would conclude that Ms. Lerner did not waive her Fifth Amendment rights. It is unfortunate that the majority party in the House put politics before a citizen's Constitutional rights," the sleazeball added.
It's a shame that a public servant put politics before duty and used her Constitutional rights to get away with unlawful behavior. Hey, isn't that what Islamic organizations like CAIR do? Anyone who isn't mentally married to the mainstream media and knows the whole story will see through Taylor III balderdash. Perhaps he's correct about her Constitutional rights, but he absolutely knows that he's defending a scumcrumpet in Lois Lerner.
I give credit to the six Democrats who sided with morals and ethics and refused to tow the party line and voted along the House Oversight Committee's decision to hold her in contempt. This came after her May 2013 appearance in front of the committee when she made a statement proclaiming her innocence but then refused to answer their questions to defend her claim.
It seems that she wants to have it both ways: to make a statement about her innocence, but then refuse to answer to that statement. She's an Obama Democrat so it worked.
Hillary appears to be on the same path with the Select Congressional Committee on Benghazi. She dumped her emails and doesn't worry about the repercussions. She said that she dumped only the personal emails about Chelsea's wedding and yoga plans but gave all government emails up.
Who sends over 30,000 personal emails and then dumps them, especially those of important family history? You save those emails and you immediately dump those that would get you in trouble.
Like Lois and Hillary, and like many liberals who aren't very smart, they don't realize that conservatives see through their obfuscating ploys.
The game should be over for them, but it never is.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment