Gillibrand outed for not wearing a mask in NYC restaurant; vows 'to do better'

 The mask mandates are stupid, many of us would agree. But the most annoying thing is how some people on the Left who call for the mandates, believe the rules don't apply to them because they are part of an elite hierarchy the rest of us don't enjoy. They flagrantly ignore their own rules and things they say about the claimed efficacy of masks in the time of Covid.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) told Fox News Digital that she would "do better" in the future after a restaurant owner in New York City posted a video of her "blowing past [the] manager" and ignoring signs requiring masks. Had that video not existed, you can bet she wouldn't have pretended to be contrite. 

"We all need to do our part to help stop the spread of Omicron and that means following state and local guidance," Gillibrand lied Fox News Digital. "That includes me and I will do better going forward."

Masks don't stop the spread of coronavirus very well, nor do vaccines, although they appear to assuage the more severe symptoms. As far as omicron is concerned, wearing a mask is like trying to stop mosquitos from flying through your chickenwire fence.

The restaurant in question is the Innovo Kitchen. The frustrated owner, whose business could be shut down if he fails to comply with the stupid mandate, vented his frustration on the restaurant's Instagram.

"The problem with NY politics in a nut shell. My Senator blowing past my manager before she can even ask her to put a mask on. Walking right past a really big sign that says 'masks required to enter,'" the owner wrote.

"The masks are a mandate from the Governor. As good citizens, agree or not, we must follow our leaders. Her guest is graciously wearing one. I guess Senator Gillibrand thinks that the Governor is wrong or she is special and above the rules," the post continued.

No, the restaurant owner is wrong. Gillibrand doesn't think the governor is right or wrong, she just thinks the rules "are for thee, but not for me." After all, she a U.S. Senator and you are not.

Gillibrand is a loud proponent of the vaccine and for getting boosted against COVID-19 as the omicron variant rages making the vaccine, boosters and masks basically irrelevant. But you and me still have to comply.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

"Protect yourself and help ease the strain on hospitals and health care workers. Get vaccinated and boosted," the hypocrite said in a Twitter post this week.

People are getting fed up with this nonsense and pretty soon it may show. It may take the midterm elections or the people simply to damn mad to comply.

But it's definitely time to vote these liars and losers out of office this year.

Tweet

Biden sees Cuomo's behavior as unimpeachable

"You want me to stand here?"

Semi-sentient President Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., finally awakened, realized he was president, and mush-mouthed his thoughts about Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-NY) regarding one out of two scandals he is facing. Predictably, Biden declined to call for the governor's resignation.

Biden, a guy with the same signature moves as Cuomo and longtime acquaintance, finally got around to addressing the scandal in an unscheduled question and answer bull session on the South Lawn of the White House. This comes after Democrats Chuck "Nostrils" Schumer and Kirsten "Believe All Women" Gillibrand finally went after Cuomo and his sexual allegations and inappropriate touching of a woman's breast scandal. 

They are calling for Cuomo to resign so that they don't have to deal with how he was responsible for the deaths of 15,000 nursing home residents while the left applauded him and the media gave him an Emmy for his comedic work with his buffed brother Fredo of the Compromised News Network.

When asked for his opinion on Cuomo regarding a resignation, Biden said, "Who? Oh, yeah, him. Well, I think the investigation is underway, right? It is, isn't it? Oh, so yes, I think we should wait and see what it brings us. Maybe pudding. Jill?"

There will be more to come--stay tuned.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Kirsten Gillibrand blasts due process over Biden allegations

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) is like a weather vane. Whichever the wind blows, that's the direction she takes. She pretends to be a feminist but all she ends up showing us is that she's a hypocrite. The Washington Examiner has an entire article from last year dedicated to her flip-flopping.

Gillibrand's Native American name is "Shines Through Both Ears."

In fact, ever since the sexual assault allegation against Joe Biden, the presumptive Democrat presidential nominee, the #BelieveAllWomen movement has become a bad joke, and Democrats who are now making excuses for Biden after having gone tooth and nail against Brett Kavanaugh's SCOTUS appointment, are being unmasked as the fools that they are.

Recently, in a radio interview with Evan Dawson, host of the show "Connections," Gillibrand was questioned about the differences between Kavanaugh's allegations and Biden's. In order to make a pro-Biden case, she lied about the facts in Kavanaugh's case.

The senator falsely asserted: 

“There were multiple allegations against Brett Kavanaugh in various circumstances. Not only Dr. Blasey Ford’s allegations but several from his college days. Um, there was a similarity in the multiple allegations against him, um, and he had a terrible record on supporting women and I opposed him based on his actual record and I did not believe his statements and so I think they’re very different. Also, Brett Kavanaugh was a Supreme Court Justice nominee for a lifetime appointment and my responsibility was to vote up or down and I voted against him on the merits of him not being qualified for that job.”

First of all, the "multiple allegations" against Kavanaugh were all proved to be highly doubtful. Even those of Blasey-Ford were disproved by her best friend and others "witnesses" she tried to get to corroborate her story. Her friend could not even remember meeting Kavanaugh, so Blasey-Ford and the media went after her friend accusing her of having mental illness.

Even her so-called facts were lacking veracity. She couldn't remember the year the alleged assault happened in spite of her being in high school at the time, which should have easily narrowed it down, alternating the claim that it occurred in the mid 80s to the early 80s.

The similarities between the allegations made against Kavanaugh versus those made against Biden are as comparable as night and goldfish, and Gillibrand should know this as she is supposed to be a lawyer.

One allegation alleged Kavanaugh pushed a woman on a bed and groped her. Another allegation made by another woman said he dropped his pants and exposed his penis to her. Yet another claim said his penis was put into another woman’s hand by a third party. Yet another false accusation said he organized teenage gang-rape parties. And finally, a false accusation said he raped someone in a van.

All proven to be lies or false memories [to be nice about it].

Gillibrand simply doesn't like Kavanaugh's conservative judgments, and let's face it, everything she says, including "pass the peas" is political. As long as Biden is on the left side of issues, he's okay and deserves to be president as far as the hypocrites on the left are concerned.

Biden may have been accused, but he’s passed policies that Gillibrand likes, so even if he might be guilty, he can’t possibly be guilty in Gillibrand's way of thinking. This is the case in spite of the fact that there’s actual evidence Biden met his accuser while there is absolutely no evidence Kavanaugh had ever met Ford.

Gillibrand then falsely claimed in the interview that she voted against Kavanaugh because she didn’t think he was qualified for the job, but her words tell a different story.

This is what she said during Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing:

“Do we value women in this country? Do we listen to women when they tell us about sexual trauma? Do we listen to their stories about how their lives have been forever scarred? Do we take their claims seriously? Or do we just disbelieve them as a matter of course?”

But what she meant only intended to apply to conservatives and other non-leftists.

“She has come forward, she has spoken, and they have done an investigation in several outlets. Those investigations, Vice President Biden has called for himself,” Gillibrand said. “Vice President Biden has vehemently denied these allegations and I support Vice President Biden.”

So much for the rule of law in Tara Reade's case. For Gillibrand, politics is more important than process, more important than justice and truth.

Gillibrand was also asked about policies from the Department of Education that would provide college students with basic due process protections in cases of alleged sexual misconduct.

The senator without a soul naturally trashed the policies, instantly going back to favoring allegations over evidence. Had her thinking been applied to Biden, he would be guilty based on accusation. Gillibrand time and again, proves herself to be a wavering idiot.

“Well, I think Betsy DeVos has been a disastrous Secretary of Education and she has intended since the minute she had that position to roll back protections for students on campus and to roll back Title IX protections."

Title IX only protects the accuser to the point of barring the accused from confronting the accuser and having the right to defend himself. Accused students could never get “fair justice or a fair review” when colleges dismissed exculpatory evidence and allowed accusers to avoid having to produce evidence of their claims. The Department of Education under Title IX was running the show like a gulag.

Gillibrand continued to bloviate: "She has undermined the ability for anyone to get fair justice or a fair review on any college campus and I think it’s a big mistake. Um, so I look forward to when Betsy DeVos is no longer our Ed. Secretary,” Gillibrand said, discounting the fact that the accused is also a person who deserves to be heard.

What does this senator from New York know about fair justice? She thinks justice belongs to people who can further her political career.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

Leftists want Chris Hayes of MSNBC fired for doing journalism

Liberals and leftists are similar in much of their thinking, but the biggest difference is that liberals are sometimes willing to respectfully debate conservatives while leftists want conservatives silenced by any means necessary. The main reason for this is because leftists have no good arguments due to a severe lack of information on any given subject.

Chris Hayes of MSNBC, who is a "Never Trumper" and by no means a conservative, pissed off a lot of leftist viewers who support the "almost late" Joe Biden on Wednesday night when Hayes reported on the sexual assault allegations against Biden, according to The Hill.

After Hayes discussed the accusation made by former Biden staffer Tara Reade during a segment, #FireChrisHayes began trending on Twitter, because, as previously mentioned, leftists cannot tolerate an opposing opinion or a news story that attacks their low values.

The allegation against Biden came from a former Biden staffer who, in the early 1990s claims she was sexually assaulted by him. He allegedly had her up against a wall, put his hands up her dress and digitally penetrated her vagina. His campaign, who was not there, denied the allegation and on Friday, Biden denied it as well but is refusing to allow senate records to be made available.

Hayes was interviewing Rebecca Traister of New York Magazine about an article she wrote, titled, "The Biden Trap," which focused on Biden's silence about the allegation while his female supporters are questioned about it. This is what made leftists go bat-crap crazy.

"What this is creating is a kind of a perfect storm where the women who are being asked to support his opponent are now being asked to answer for these charges," Traister said. "In part because of the vacuum created by Joe Biden, who is not yet really directly answering these questions, and certainly, not doing what I wish he would, which is to say: 'Please direct your questions about these allegations to me, and not the women that are out there offering their support to my candidacy.'"

But why not direct questions to those women who say that we should believe all women? It shows their abject hypocrisy now that they have to do verbal calisthenics to defend Biden, an alleged sexual offender.

Hayes agreed with Traister that Biden should be forthcoming and address the issue himself and relieve the pressure of those hypocritical women: Stacey Abrams, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and others. 

Even this whiff of journalistic honesty was too much for leftists who were so quick to attack Justice Kavanaugh at his hearings when Christine Blasey Ford came forth with accusations that even her own witnesses denied ever happened.

So, it's believe all women who make sexual assault allegations only when those allegations are against a Republican.

They hypocrisy is palpable.

Biden is now trying to do a balancing act--believe all women but continue to maintain that Tara Reade is lying. Lucky for Sleepy Joe, the leftist media will not force him to go into any serious detail over the issue.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Democratic hospital exec fired after calling for Trump supporters to die

A top medical executive at a Buffalo, New York hospital was fired over the weekend after she demanded that President Trump supporters give up their ventilators and die if they become infected with the coronavirus. She previously worked for Hillary Clinton and Kirsten Gillibrand, so it figures.

In a Facebook posting, Laura Krolczyk, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center's now former vice president for external affairs, wrote, "Trump supporters need to pledge to give up their ventilators for someone else ... and not go to the hospital."

Krolczyk. who clearly seems to have a problem with Christianity and people on the other side of the political aisle, said Trump supporters should "barricade themselves" inside churches to ride out the coronavirus.

"Also don't cash your stimulus check. It's all a hoax. Chew some ibuprofen and be on with your day," Krolczyk wrote of Trump supporters.

Krolczyk was initially placed on administrative leave, but was later terminated over the comments, according to the Buffalo News.

Roswell Park released the following statement announcing Krolczyk's termination, WGRZ-TV, the local network reported:

This employee was terminated today [Saturday] after our Human Resources team concluded its investigation. We followed standard procedure, which required that we gather and verify relevant information before taking any disciplinary action. 

Dr. Johnson and her team responded with swift and appropriate action. We have always been and continue to be a center serving everyone who needs us. That is core to our mission, our culture and the experience our patients and families can expect every day. 

This behavior is not tolerated at Roswell Park. If any team members act in a way that does not accord with that commitment, we will take swift and appropriate action, just as we did in this instance.

Krolczyk was paid $226,580 in 2019, the Buffalo News reported. They obviously did not get their money's worth.

With these times of sickness and worry, the world does not need such disgusting mean-spirited negativity and hate. People like Krolczyk should not be employed in health care, an area of work that should never be political.

And finally, when will people learn that you should never put such bile on social media--it often comes back to haunt you.



Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.






Tweet

BREAKING: Gillibrand drops out of 2020 race: may go into tee shirt business

"Oh yeah? Sit down and shut up!"

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) who gave out Gillibrand tee shirts for everyone who had not previously donated to her campaign to give at least one dollar so that she would be qualified for the third debate on September 12, has announced Wednesday that she was dropping out of the race. Sadly for her, and happily for the nation, the New York senator who inherited Hillary Clinton's seat when she ran for president and lost to Donald Trump, did not qualify for the debate.

This leaves Gillibrand with enough tee shirts to start a small business and perhaps make enough money to try another White House run in the future.

“I think being able to have a voice on a debate stage, when other candidates have that, is really important,” the 52-year-old Gillibrand said. “And without it, I just didn’t see our path,” speaking of herself in the plural.

Gillibrand said that while she would support the eventual Democratic nominee whoever it may be, she would be particularly excited to see the party nominate a woman, because having a woman is more important than having the best person in the job. Of course, that could be a woman, but gender or any form of identity politics is a stupid way to vote.

“I think that women have a unique ability to bring people together and heal this country. I think a woman nominee would be inspiring and exciting.” she said. “I will support whoever the nominee is, and I will do whatever it takes to beat Trump.”

The clueless senator said she plans to endorse one of the other Democratic primary candidates, although she would not reveal whom because she's waiting to see who has the best chance of securing her a position in the administration.

Former Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) had no comment.

Please consider following this blog and feel free to click on the ads on this page. It costs nothing, and may just save your life. Or not. But seriously, please check out the ads as this is my source of generating revenue.

Tweet

Gillibrand lies about guns, the NRA, and gets called out

People who a clueless are clueless of their cluelessness. Democratic presidential candidate who is currently polling in the high zeros is Sen. Kirsten "I'm Flexible" Gillibrand (D-NY). She has taken more positions than the Kama Sutra and is a lot less interesting.

Gillibrand told a string of lies about U.S. firearm laws and the National Rifle Association. Maybe she was just "shooting from the hip" but she doesn't seem to know what she was talking about in the Fox News town hall on Sunday hosted by Chris Wallace. And while Wallace is not a fierce conservative, he called her out on her statements.

Gillibrand has repeatedly lied about firearms and the NRA on the campaign trail, and she repeated many of her debunked lies on Sunday night because she, like most people in her party, believe all liberals are low-information voters.

"The NRA is the worst organization in this country," Gillibrand said. "They care more about their profits than the American people. They care more about selling guns to someone on the terror watch list or someone with grave mental illness or who has a violent criminal background."

The NRA is a non-profit organization and they do not sell firearms, so Gillibrand is either a liar or a moron--but of course, both things can be true at the same time.

Gillibrand's claim that NRA wants to sell guns to "someone on the terror watch list" is laughably false. FiveThirtyEight reports:

But civil liberties and gun rights groups are critical of the list. ... But the ACLU, citing secret documents released by the journalism site The Intercept, was critical in 2014 of the growing numbers of people on the watch list, saying there are no clear standards by which to determine who is placed in a database that can be used for religious and racial profiling. The rights of American citizens to contest their possible inclusion on the list is infringed because of the list’s secrecy, the ACLU said.

Gillibrand twisted what the NRA actually said. They don't want terrorists being allowed to buy guns, but they don't believe the terror watch list is the way to go to stop them because some names on that list are there by mistake. In a statement on Wednesday, the group said that “due process protections should be put in place that allow law-abiding Americans who are wrongly put on a watch list to be removed.”

Also, the law is very clear. According to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, violent criminals are already prohibited from owning firearms, as are people who have "grave mental illness," assuming that they have been "adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution."

The problem is not legal firearms, it's the illegal ones that kill the innocent victims most of the time.

Later during the town hall, after Gillibrand made additional false claims, Gillibrand made false claims about the Trump administration.

"Remember, after the shooting in Las Vegas [Trump] said, ‘we’re going to ban the bump stocks.’ Did he ban the bump stocks? No! Because the NRA came crashing down."

She lied.

The Trump administration did ban bump stocks after the shooting and the ban just went into effect earlier this year. The NRA did nothing to intervene on the issue.

"The NRA is lying to the American people, it is not about the Second Amendment. … [The NRA] wants to make sure an abuser who has a restraining order against him can buy a weapon," Gillibrand, who was lying to the American people, falsely said.

As stated in its bylaws, the NRA exists to "protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, especially with reference to the inalienable right of the individual American citizen guaranteed by such Constitution to acquire, possess, collect, exhibit, transport, carry, transfer ownership of, and enjoy the right to use arms, in order that the people may always be in a position to exercise their legitimate individual rights of self-preservation and defense of family, person, and property, as well as to serve effectively in the appropriate militia for the common defense of the Republic and the individual liberty of its citizens."

Wallace called out Gillibrand for her total screwup on the issue of guns and said, “It sounds a lot more like it’s politics than principles… how do you explain the change?”


When she was a representative in a conservative district, Gillibrand loved the NRA and supported gun rights, which the NRA reminded her of on Monday.

Maybe we should call her "Pander Bear."


Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey 
Thanks.

Tweet

Bobby [Bozo] O'Rourke would do Fox town hall

"Who sat on the mic?"

Former Texas Rep. and former U.S. Senatorial losing candidate, and former guitarist and failed writer,  Beto O'Rourke said Monday that he would be grateful to participate in a town hall hosted by Fox News because his poll numbers are so bad, it's possible that not even his wife would vote for him. Of course, she has an excuse--Beto tried to slip her a turd from their son's diaper and pretended it was a green avocado.

O'Rourke's willingness to go on Fox is a break with a number of his campaign rivals.

When asked at a campaign stop in Iowa about whether he'd be willing to appear on an actual non-leftist cable network, he told so-called reporters that he "absolutely" would be. 

After all, if he's willing to go on YouTube to show the American people that just like us, he gets his hair cut and goes to the dentist, why not go on Fox? 

Just hope he never goes for a colonoscopy.

“This campaign is about going to where people are, and you see that physically in where I show up [like he did in Mexico.] But it also has to be in those channels or those social media streams where people get their news and their information. That also includes Fox.”

Incidentally, more people watch Fox than any of those leftist networks.

The presidential hopeful said he was unaware of any current talks between his team and Fox News, which Democratic Party leadership said earlier this year was too biased to host any of its primary debates this cycle. Perhaps Fox doesn't want to waste their time with a loser.

O'Rourke's remarks come one day after South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D) participated in a town hall on the network that drew 1.1 million total viewers. It was a smart move on his part because if he screwed up, he could blame the conservative attackers at Fox [which of course Chris Wallace is not.] If he was successful [which it appears he was] he'd reach tons of folks.

Sens. Bernie "Comrade" Sanders (I-VT) and Amy "Clean This" Klobachar (D-MN) have also done events hosted by Fox News. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) will appear in a Fox News town hall on June 2 and I have already put that in my Google calendar to make sure I'm doing something else.

Other candidates, however, have refused to appear in the network's events.

Sen. Elizabeth "Dances with Heritage" Warren (D-MA) accused Fox News of being a "hate-for-profit machine" while saying that she would never appear in a town hall hosted by the network. She is kind of stupid if she really wants a shot at "Heap Big" prize of the Democratic nomination.

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) has also indicated she would refuse a town hall invitation because they might ask difficult questions.

Kindly consider following Brain Flushings and please visit the ads on these pages. Thank you.

Tweet

Gillibrand's campaign will probably have the longevity of a moth at a campfire

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) has become as relevant as a nightlight is to Chuck Norris. At one time people thought she was going to be the next Hillary Clinton, except not the loser part. She took over Hillary's Senate seat [was it still warm, I wonder], and she came out like a hockey mom whose kid got thrown into the boards.

Now, not so much.

"KG" is pulling in about one percent of the vote, and it isn't the Bernie "millionaires and billionaires" who support her, even though she now stands behind Bernie's platform. But that's her problem--she's like a chameleon when it comes to policy. She will go where the political winds blow.

Her fall from ratings she now blames on former Sen. Al Franken (D-MN).

Gillibrand's campaign reports, in FEC documents filed this week, that she took in a meager $3 million in the first quarter of 2019, which is like a friend handing you three bucks and asking you to buy a carton of cigarettes for them.

Why the trouble?

She has a theory as to why she can't gain headway on her campaign: "she's suffering backlash from sexists who objected to her calling out Franken for his inappropriate, sexually charged behavior, and spearheading his removal from the Senate," according to The Daily Wire.

Gillibrand's campaign will probably not be around for long. She needs to command at least an additional 4% of the vote to make it into the Democratic primary debates (she has a better chance getting struck by a major league fastball at an NFL game), or prove that more than 65,000 separate individuals donated to her cause, which is about the number of people who ride aboard the roof of a New Delhi bound bus during rush hour.

She might as well go camping.


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Gillibrand wants to reach out and touch someone with a tactile nuke: Bolton nearly wets himself

U.S. National Security Adviser John Bolton along with his mustache, was a guest on the  Hugh Hewitt’s show, and broke up laughing, nearly wetting himself, at silly remarks made by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (Dummy-NY) showing her tremendous grasp of nuclear weaponry in which she referred to “tactile” nuclear weapons. She apparently feels they’re dangerous because they’re something you can reach out and touch and with which you can blow someone to smithereens.

Hewitt played a clip of Gillibrand speaking at a townhall in Dover, New Hampshire, in which she repeatedly referred to “tactile” nuclear weapons, which caused Bolton to go on a laugh marathon.

Here's the exchange:

Hewitt: Last question, Ambassador Bolton. The presidential campaign is underway. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand ventured into strategic matters at a town hall in Dover. Let me play you a 40 second cut of what she had to say and ask the follow up question. Cut number 17:

Gillibrand can be heard saying, “When you say you want to develop low-yield nuclear weapons that are tactile, what you’re saying is you want to use them. Now the military will make an argument to say oh, this is just again to make, we have to have an equal threat. And this, if it’s usable, then it’s a better threat. I just found that is not believable. I just, I, they’re trying to create nuclear weapons that are usable. So I opposed the entire Defense bill because of that one provision. So if I am president, I am going to make sure we unwind that completely, and I don’t think we should be trying to create tactile nuclear weapons.”

Hewitt continued, “So the…”

Bolton, laughing so hard his mustache did the Electric Slide, “Tactile nuclear weapons?”

Hewitt: Well, I was unfamiliar with the concept, Mr. Ambassador.

Bolton can’t stop laughing.

Hewitt: What are you up to?

Bolton still laughing, “I have to say, I was unfamiliar with it as well. I wonder what Senator Gillibrand knows that I don’t.”

Hewitt: Oh, they are very worried.

Bolton is still laughing uncontrollably.

Hewitt: I’ve been studying this stuff with, since President Nixon was in retirement in San Clemente. First time I’ve heard of tactile nuclear weapons. So what, is something going on at Andrew Marshall’s old office at the Pentagon we don’t know about?

Bolton: (laughing) Well, you know, Hugh, as national security advisor, I don’t get involved in politics. But I’ll just say maybe Senator Gillibrand could give me a call and tell me what she knows about those tactile nuclear weapons. I’d be interested in learning it. (laughing--see video above).

Now let's be clear. There are weapons known as "tactical" nuclear weapons. They are low-yield and destroy less stuff than the big boys [pun intended, if you get it], so there's less collateral damage. 

Former Secretary of Defense James "Mad Dog" Mattis had stated there was no such thing, asserting, "I don’t think there is any such thing as a ‘tactical nuclear weapon.’ Any nuclear weapon used any time is a strategic game-changer."

But even if you disagree with Mattis, be assured that there are no tactile nukes in our arsenal.

Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Leftist activists [aka media, Democrats] edit clip of POTUS calling MS-13 gangbangers 'animals'

Seriously, there really should be a law preventing political parties from deceptively editing out the true meaning of their opponent's message.

Democrats, fake news "journalists," and far-left activists [there I go being redundant] have used a deceptively edited video clip from last year to depict President Trump as a heartless xenophobe. The clip showed Trump calling immigrants and asylum seekers "animals," when, in fact, he was referring to members of the notoriously disgustingly violent animals of the MS-13 street gang.

Mark Elliott, a Twitter user, posted the following tweet on Friday with the caption: "[email protected] on people asking for asylum 'These aren't people. These are animals.'" It conveniently left out the context of who the President was referring to.

Elliott embedded the video from a CSPAN tweet.

CNN, believe it or not, was one of the few news organizations that accurately reported the full context of what Trump said when he made the remarks. Here is the relevant part of the transcript:

Sheriff Margaret Mims: "There could be an MS-13 member I know about — if they don’t reach a certain threshold, I cannot tell ICE about it."

President Donald Trump: "We have people coming into the country, or trying to come in — and we’re stopping a lot of them — but we’re taking people out of the country. You wouldn’t believe how bad these people are. These aren’t people. These are animals. And we’re taking them out of the country at a level and at a rate that’s never happened before. And because of the weak laws, they come in fast, we get them, we release them, we get them again, we bring them out. It’s crazy."

Here a few of the Democrat politicians, far-left activists, and people in the media who have peddled this lie since Friday:

Democrat presidential candidate Kirsten Gillibrand: "Racist language like this has led to violence throughout the world’s history. No human being is an animal. We have to be better than this." Then she ate a spider.

Photo: The Onion

Democrat presidential candidate Pete [pronounced 'Butter Judge']: "You do not refer to human beings as animals. You just don’t." Pete refers to humans as 'vegetables' when he disagrees with them.

DNC Chairman Tom "Potty Mouth" Perez: "This type of dehumanizing language is dangerous, and against everything we stand for as a country." Then he said a word meaning excrement.

Far-left activist and national twerp David Hogg who got his fame by the shooting deaths of his classmates: "Step two on the pyramid of committing genocide: Dehumanization."

CNN's Ana Navarro: "This is journalist, @TifaniRoberts comforting a small boy on the border. He was shot in the throat by Ortega’s thugs in Nicaragua. This little boy is seeking asylum in the United States. His name is William. Trump calls him 'animal'."

Christine Teigen: "f***ing vile man." Yes, but you're not vile Christine--you're a classy chick.

MSNBC's Joy "The Homophobe" Reid: "Asylum seekers 'aren't people.' They are 'animals.' This is particularly frightening language coming out of a person vested with the power of a presidential office."

Mikel Jollett, frontman of the band The Airborne Toxic Effect: "The President of the United States literally saying immigrants aren’t 'human.' This is the literal definition of the 'dehumanization' which precedes genocide." Kind of what MS-13 practices in smaller doses.

Sherrilyn Ifill President and Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund: "This is so irresponsible and dangerous. We have seen this around the world." Except you either didn't really watch the video or you're an irresponsible liar.

Democrat Rep. Yvette D. Clarke (NY): "This is appalling. This is cruel. This is dehumanizing. This is racist. This is un-American. This is Donald J. Trump." This is bull crap.

Democrat Rep. TJ Cox (CA): "Immigrants aren’t animals. Children aren’t animals. And they don’t deserve to be locked in cages, separated from their families." It was Obama who initially put the children in cages.

Democrat Rep. Chrissy "Hot Lips" Houlahan (PA): "My father, who was welcomed by this country after surviving the Holocaust, is not an animal. The people seeking refuge and asylum in America like he did are not animals. Smart and effective border security does not involve denigrating our fellow humans. Full stop."

New York Times columnist Wajahat Ali: "Glad it's out in the open. Dehumanization. It always begins with language. Soon they will be rats and rodents and a horde. And what do we do to those animals when they 'invade' our homes?...."

Glad it's out in the open how the dishonesty of the media is being exposed. But it isn't enough that the conservative media is doing this because the left may never see it. Example: I spoke to my liberal sister a few days ago to wish her a happy birthday. I asked her what she thought about Democrats supporting late-term abortion and in some cases, abortion right up to birth and even after delivery. She said, "That's not true."

She didn't believe me!

So I researched the latest news on this issue and emailed it to her. She soon responded that it was a video from Fox News and that she wouldn't even open it because they're so opinionated.

Do you see the screaming irony?

I told her that it was video with Democrats actually voicing their opinions about late term abortion, but still, she didn't want to watch it because it was from Fox News.

What have we learned? That the Democrats will take a video and only show what they want you to see, but will not look at a video that might challenge "their truth" with "the truth."



Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Dems block 'born alive' bill that would provide care to babies of failed murder attempts

I honestly don't know how some people can live with themselves. One day society is going to look back at our history and see us as savages who would murder our own children. Most animals don't do that, particularly animals with a fully developed frontal cortex, but we do. At least the far-left does.

Senate Democrats on Monday blocked a Republican bill that would have called for prison time for abortion doctors who don't attempt life saving procedures of infants born alive during failed attempts at murdering them.

How is this appealing to leftist voters?

All prominent Democratic 2020 presidential animals in the Senate voted down the measure, including socialist Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Kamala "I Slept My Way On Up" Harris of California, Cory "Spartacus" Booker of New Jersey, Kirsten "I Go All Ways" Gillibrand of New York, Amy "Wash This" Klobuchar of Minnesota and Elizabeth "Dances With Bull" Warren of Massachusetts. The final vote was 53-44 to end Democratic delaying tactics -- seven votes short of the 60 needed.

Three Democrats supported the Republican bill -- Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Bob Casey of Pennsylvania and Doug Jones or Alabama. Three Republicans did not vote, due to scheduling conflicts and plane flight delays: Kevin Cramer of North Dakota, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Tim Scott of South Carolina.

The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act would have required that "any health care practitioner present" at the time of a birth "exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child as a reasonably diligent and conscientious health care practitioner would render to any other child born alive at the same gestational age."

It's a baby. A child is born and you don't stand there and allow he or she to die.

President Trump tweeted:

Senate Democrats just voted against legislation to prevent the killing of newborn infant children. The Democrat position on abortion is now so extreme that they don’t mind executing babies AFTER birth.... 

....This will be remembered as one of the most shocking votes in the history of Congress. If there is one thing we should all agree on, it’s protecting the lives of innocent babies.

Yes, we're talking about innocent babies. There is simply no excuse for not passing this bill. None, because it isn't tied into another bill, it stands alone.

The bill, which exempted the mother involved in the birth from prosecution, also would have required practitioners to "ensure that the child born alive is immediately transported and admitted to a hospital." 

The bill prescribed a possible term of imprisonment of up to five years for violations, not including penalties for first-degree murder that could have applied.

Aside from Trump, other Republicans also couldn't believe the Democrat's refusal to agree to these terms. "I want to ask each and every one of my colleagues whether or not we're OK with infanticide," said the bill's chief sponsor, Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE).

Sasse spoke to Fox News' "The Story" after the vote, saying that he was "surprised" at each vote against the bill, and charged that opponents had lied "constantly" with "blatant nonsense" about the legislation -- specifically, by claiming the bill "would end abortion" entirely.

"This is about the most simple thing you can say, which is that a baby is a baby, and they have dignity and worth," Sasse said. "And it's not because they're powerful. It's because they're babies. Today is a sad day in the United States Senate."

Sasse added, "This shouldn't be about politics. ... This should be about having heart."

A panel of people who survived abortions

This should be about having even a modicum of morality.

Other pro-life activists called on the 44 senators who voted against Sasse's bill to resign immediately.

“Senators who could not bring themselves to vote to pass the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act should reconsider whether or not they have what it takes to serve," March for Life President Jeanne Mancini said in an understatement. 

"Senator Sasse’s common sense bill would merely require doctors assist a newborn struggling to survive after a failed attempt on her life. Anyone who lacks the basic level of human compassion needed to vote in favor of this should quickly find another job. We look forward to a vote in the House of Representatives so that Chamber can get on record as well.”

Opponents, noting the rarity of such births and citing laws already making it a crime to kill newborn babies, said the bill was unnecessary. But they still refused to sign it anyway.

They said it was part of a push by abortion opponents to curb access to the procedure and intimidate doctors who perform it, and said late-term abortions generally occur when the infant is considered incapable of surviving after birth.

“This bill is just another line of attack in the ongoing war on women’s health,” New Hampshire Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen said on the Senate floor.

Women's health? How? That's nonsense and a lie.

Sasse introduced the legislation after Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam, (D) endorsed post-birth abortions while discussing The Repeal Act, a state bill which sought to repeal restrictions on third-trimester abortions. Northam made headlines when his medical school yearbook had a photo of him in either blackface of a KKK outfit, which he apologized for then later denied.

Virginia Democratic Del. Kathy Tran, a cold blooded sponsor of that post-birth abortion bill, was asked at a hearing if a woman about to give birth and dilating could still request an abortion.

"My bill would allow that, yes,” Tran said. Northam, in a later interview with a radio station, backed up Tran. Both Northam and Tran clearly have the morals of mother crabs which eats their babies.

"When we talk about third-trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of, obviously, the mother, with the consent of the physicians, more than one physician, by the way," Northam said, referring to abortion doctors who get paid to kill babies. "And, it's done in cases where there may be severe deformities, there may be a fetus that's non-viable." 

Or just for the hell of it.

Northam continued: "So, in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother. So, I think this was really blown out of proportion."

It's so thoughtful to keep the INFANT comfortable before you kill it.

If you don't think this is evil, then I am at a loss for words.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Rep. Liz Cheney enters GND draft summary into Congressional Record for a good LOL

House Republicans announced on Wednesday that they have entered an outline of the sophomoric and controversial "Green New Deal" along with the list of frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding the Democratic's communist proposal into the Congressional Record. The document was deleted from the website of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, (Ditz-NY) because of the laughter it created when normal people read it, but the public, as well as the GOP, were able to capture it before it was "Bleach Bit" by the former bartender turned congresswoman.

"It's very important the American people see that there be transparency about what [Democrats] are pushing," Rep. Liz Cheney, (R-WY), said at the House GOP's weekly press conference. "And we call on [House] Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi, (D-CA), to put this up for a vote on the floor," Cheney said, taking a page out of the Sen. Mitch McConnell playbook.

"We think Democrats need to be held accountable. If they support this as they say they do and as their presidential candidates do," Cheney added," then let's have a vote on it and see to what extent they're all going to get behind moving toward this kind of fantasy."

It's about time the GOP grew some cajones, and it took a woman and "Cocaine Mitch" to do the job.

You can still view the  FAQs of the Green New Deal (GND) using the Wayback Machine. It's a hoot.

It describes the GND as "a 10-year plan to create a greenhouse gas neutral society" through what it describes as "a World War II scale mobilization that focuses the robust and creative economic engine of the United States on reversing climate change by fully rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure, restoring our natural ecosystems, dramatically expanding renewable power generation, overhauling our entire transportation system, upgrading all our buildings, jumpstarting US clean manufacturing (and) transforming US agriculture."

The "farting cows" part is the best, but Alexandria Occasionally Coherent-Cortex took it down from the website. It describes how eliminating farting cows will greatly reduce the methane on the planet, so we have to eliminate them.

The outline also says the Green New Deal would provide "(e)conomic security to all who are unable or unwilling to work." It also notes that the proposal's goal is "to get to net-zero, rather than zero emissions ... because we aren’t sure that we will be able to fully get rid of," because those cow farts and air travel emissions may take longer.

Cheney's request for Pelosi to put the Green New Deal resolution up for a vote on the House floor follows a similar move from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who said Tuesday that he would bring the matter before the upper chamber of Congress to "give everybody an opportunity to go on record."

The Green New Deal is already supported by at least five senators seeking the Democratic nomination for president: Cory "Spartacus" Booker of New Jersey, Kirsten "Both Sides Now" Gillibrand of New York, Kamala "The Narc" Harris of California, Elizabeth "Dances Like White Woman" Warren of Massachusetts and Amy "Throws Binders" Klobuchar of Minnesota. Vermont Independent Sen. Bernie "Russian Cold Nipples" Sanders, who could also enter the Democratic primary, is another supporter.

A seventh potential candidate in 2020, Ohio Democratic Sen. Sherrod "?" Brown, pointedly declined Tuesday to attach his name and dismissed liberal activists' contention that he has to support the Green New Deal in order to prove his commitment to the issue.

"I don't need to co-sponsor every bill that others think they need to co-sponsor to show my progressive politics," Brown nervously told reporters.

Meanwhile, Kamala Harris fired up a doobie and listened to Tupac and some Slick Rick in her crib.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Spartacus fights the nazis and goes to the moon on the GND

Let's hope the Democratic hopefuls for the 2020 presidential race keep doing what they're doing--supporting Alexandria Obviosa-Communista's Green New Deal and going as far-left as one can go, and that's even lefter than California.

Sen. Cory Booker (Drama Queen-NJ) on Friday likened Democrat's "bold" effort to implement the Green New Deal to fighting Nazis during World War II and landing on the moon in 1969. To go where no normal man has gone before.

Yes, it's exactly the same thing as fighting the Nazis, but in this case, he wants to fight the Nazis in electric cars built by people who are willing to work, with soldiers not allowed to use assault weapons.

Booker, who launched his presidential campaign last week, is traveling through Iowa to spout histrionics with voters about various issues, including the ridiculous Green New Deal. 

The non-binding resolution was introduced by freshman idiot Rep. Alexandria Obviosa-Communista (CD-NY) and Sen. Ed Markey (MA) on Thursday. This should bode well on Markey's resume if he plans to go for a job as an economics retard.

"We have to deal with this," Spartacus said, his eyes bulging out of their sockets and spittle forming at the corners of his mouth. "Our planet is in peril and we need to be bold! It’s one of the reasons I signed on to the resolution; I co-sponsored the resolution for the Green New Deal," Booker bragged at a campaign event in Mason City, Iowa. 

"There’s a lot of people that are now blowing back on the Green New Deal," he said, [grammatically confusing number, which should be 'there are a lot of people.'] "They’re going, ‘Oh, it’s impractical, oh it’s too expensive, oh it’s all of this.’ If we used to govern our dreams that way, we would have never gone to the moon."

Right--since when does money or practicality factor into a Democrat's plan?

"We need to be bold again in America. We need to have dreams that other people say are impossible. We need to push the bounds of human potential, because that is our history," Booker added, as he tried to sound like JFK but came off sounding like a JERK, who squandered the money his mother gave him for acting lessons.

Booker argued the United States must lead on climate change as it has in the past when the planet was in peril or when Nazi and totalitarian regimes wrecked havoc. Boy, talk about pollution WWII caused.

"We came forward," Booker said, with vigah. "Who came forward to save the planet or continents from financial ruin? We came forward with the Marshall Plan."

Honestly, does anyone actually take this guy seriously?

Markey and Ocasio-Cortez, a self-described democratic socialist, released a 14-page outline for the Green New Deal resolution on Thursday. The framers of the deal call for every building in the United States to be upgraded or replaced for "state-of-the-art energy efficiency." 

The plan calls for reparation for most groups, except white men, and also aims to "overhaul transportation"; its ultimate goal is to replace "every combustion-engine vehicle" in the country, which would include planes and automobiles. It will put a lot of people out of work, but so what--the plan calls for them to get paid too. LOL.

Booker joined several other leftist presidential hopefuls in declaring their support for the Green New Deal, including those who have formed an exploratory committee or announced their candidacy: Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Kamala Harris (D-CA), and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). Sens. Bernie Sanders (Idiot-VT) and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), who is expected to announce her decision to run on Sunday, also signaled support for the resolution, while the folks who have worked for her say she is a horribly mean, disgusting, no good, terrible boss.

Cory's softer, more anti-Semitic side

Booker defended the plan by invoking the pie-in-the-sky lessons he learned in his youth.

"My parents taught me, ‘reach for the moon, reach for the stars, and even if you come up short, at least you're going to be hovering above the ground – you'll be soaring, young man," he said.

His parents should have added: "And don't quit your day job, son. You're not that bright."

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Anti-Semitic murders in 2018 'highest' in decades: Israel

The Israeli government reported last Sunday that the number of Jews murdered in anti-Semitic attacks around the globe last year reached its "highest" level in decades.

The report came after the mass shooting at the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting last October killing 11 people.

A total of 13 Jews were killed in three separate attacks over the year, according to the 2018 Global anti-Semitism Report released on International Holocaust Remembrance Day.

In January 2018, a student was murdered in California, and in March, 85-year-old Holocaust survivor Mirielle Knoll was slaughtered in a brutal attack at her Paris home.

"This marks the highest number of Jews murdered in anti-Semitic attacks since the attacks on the Argentinian Jewish community in the 1990s," the report said.

For the second year in a row, the number of anti-Semitic incidents in Britain reached a record high, according to the report, citing British charity Community Security Trust which counted over 100 anti-Semitic episodes a month in 2018, a quarter of which occurred on social media, dwarfing incidents of so-called Islamophobia.

The report noted that after a two-year decline of anti-Semitic attacks in France, there was a 69 percent rise in 2018.

Contrary to previous years, anti-Semitic violence in 2018 was "led by neo-Nazis and white supremacists", the report said.

It defined 70 percent of attacks as "anti-Israel in nature," noting a spike when the US moved its embassy to Jerusalem in May and violence flared on the Gaza border.

Diaspora Minister Naftali Bennett said it was Israel's "responsibility to help the millions of our brothers and sisters in the Diaspora [Jews living outside of Israel] who are facing more and more anti-Semitic crimes".

He called on governments around the world to "take a harsh stance against the hatred of Jews."

The report noted that there is also "room for hope."

"More and more governments are declaring their commitment to fighting anti-Semitism, and appointing emissaries to that end," the report said. The UK's Jeremy Corbyn was not among those voices, nor were Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Keith Ellison, Louis Farrakhan, Barack Obama, Linda Sarsour, Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillibrand and Andre Carson, to mention just a few Americans who oppose ending the BDS movement against Israel, which is covertly anti-Semitic, or  who themselves are openly anti-Semitic.

The Simon Wiesenthal Center in Jerusalem on Sunday also released its annual report on the "Worldwide Investigation and Prosecution of Nazi War Criminals".

It said that between April 2017 and March 2018 one person was convicted for Nazi-era crimes, while three others were charged.

So when idiots use the term 'nazi' to verbally attack anyone with whom they disagree, they are disrespecting those who lived and died at the hands of real nazis, and are diluting the horror at which the scumbags operated.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Cory 'Spartacus' Booker gets his ties on Wall Street

When Cory Booker jumped into the 2020 presidential race with his dramatic bug-eyed announcement on Friday, he promised to build his campaign the “right way,” by forgoing money from corporate political action committees and federal lobbyists.

But Spartacus' previous ties to Wall Street, the millions of dollars he accepted in donations from Wall Street companies and his defense of Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital in 2012, may bite him on the buns.

“I’m not about to sit here and indict private equity,” he said as he sat there during a "Meet the Press" interview back when he was the failed mayor of Newark, N.J. At the time, Obama’s presidential campaign was attacking Romney, who ultimately lost, in an ad describing him as someone who, in a fake Robin Hood reversal “takes from the poor and the middle class and gives to the rich.”

Booker subsequently changed tack and waffled on his position, blasting GOP efforts to take advantage of his statements and reaffirming his support for Obama, saying the president’s campaign had a right to scrutinize Romney’s characterization of himself as a job creator, which, of course he was.

And in the Senate, he opposed a compromise bill passed last year rolling back some of the restrictions on Wall Street imposed under the Dodd-Frank reform law in 2010.

“In the wake of the greed- and excess-fueled financial crisis, big banks got a massive bailout while millions of Americans lost their homes,” he said in March. “We shouldn’t be weakening the very safeguards put in place to prevent such a catastrophe from repeating itself.”

But low and behold, the finance industry contributed $2.8 million to Booker’s Senate campaign in 2014, with many of the largest donations coming from employees of three of the country’s biggest banks, according to records compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.

Workers at Goldman Sachs gave his campaign $80,400, compared with $78,120 from employees of Morgan Stanley and $64,582 from employees of JPMorgan Chase.

Law firms with major securities-industry practices gave the warrior Spartacus even more: Attorneys at Paul Weiss chipped in $177,020 while their peers at Sullivan & Cromwell donated $137,950.

Booker’s haul, which has already drawn scrutiny from envious progressives, far outstripped the industry’s contributions to any of his Democratic peers campaigning to move from the Senate to the White House in 2020.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, whose state is home to the headquarters of banks from Goldman to Citigroup, garnered only $1.15 million from the industry in her 2018 race. This is due, in part, to her inability to remain loyal to any one issue. She is like a weather vane and will go anywhere the wind blows.

Sen. Kamala Harris of California drew only $727,674 from Wall Street in her 2016 campaign, while Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts received just $355,271 in her re-election campaign last fall.

Booker had been mayor of Newark, New Jersey from 2006 to 2013. He was handed a poor, crime ridden city, and his solution was to eventually reduce the size of the police force, because liberals think backwards. Democrats have been elected to mayor of Newark consistently since 1953.

After Booker was elected, millions of dollars of private and public partnerships investment poured into Newark for Downtown development, but persistent underemployment and poverty was still an ongoing problem.

In 2008, the murder rate climbed by 30 percent according to the New York Times . It had dropped by that amount the previous year and made a bloody comeback with Spartacus in charge.

As of 2010, about 33 percent of the population was impoverished. That year, about two-thirds of voters age 18 and up, were registered Democrats, voting for the smoke and mirror promises made by that party.

Data from 2010 by the U.S. Census Bureau as reported in NJ.com describes Newark as the third poorest of 35 poorest towns in the state. The median income in Newark is $33,025 and a 29.1 below poverty level, [with the latest level slightly higher]. Camden only follows Atlantic City [$26,656 and median poverty level 36.6] and Camden [$26,214 and median poverty level 38.4] as the poorest city in the state.

In 2012, CNN Money rated Newark as America's 6th most dangerous city.

And Cory Booker wants to be president when he can't even figure out how to improve a city.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Gillibrand bills taxpayers for private jet while spreading the warnings of global warming

It's obvious that the people who have the most negative impact on the global environment are those who make their reputations warning us about global warming. Al Gore immediately comes to mind.

And now there's U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) who is definitely considering a run for the 2020 presidential race. She, like her idiot soul sister, Alexandria Occasionally Coherent-Cortex, is warning the nation about the "life or death threat" to Americans as she speaks of her support for the "Green New Deal," which will cost the taxpayers over $40 TRILLION over ten years.

But Gillibrand has no problem billing and bilking the taxpayers for her private jet travel to places where she could just as easily flown commercial or taken ground transportation and leaving a smaller carbon footprint.

Shades of Al Gore!

A 2014 USA Today investigation found that the far-left senator charged taxpayers $93,098 chartering jets for trips to her state in 2013, according to Senate financial documents.

In 2012, Gillibrand billed taxpayers $194,797 for 30 chartered flights, the second highest in the Senate, coming only after Democrat Chuck "Nostrils" Schumer (NY). And while Democrat Nancy "Dancing Hands" Pelosi spent less, she tends to rack up huge booze bills paid for by Joe Taxpayer.

Schumer and Gillibrand topped private jet spending again between October 2014 and September 2015, the American Media Institute reported in 2016. Gillibrand billed taxpayers more than $150,000 for those flights. They could have flown commercial at a tenth of the cost they caused.

Perhaps it's time to restrict office budgets on Capitol Hill.

Gillibrand has already flip-flopped on positions, including her position on illegal immigration, to be more in line with today’s "lefter" Democratic Party. Not to be overly ironic,  Gillibrand recently bragged about her support for legislation to “to keep fossil fuels in the ground.”

“We need to tell the American people we are going to have a green economy in the next 10 years not, because it’s easy but, because it’s hard,” Gillibrand told Pod Save America in an interview Tuesday, trying her best to sound like JFK without the Hahvahd accent.

“And I just believe that global climate change is one of the greatest threats to humanity. It is a life or death threat that we have to face right now. And it’s been a life or death threat for a long time across this country, Gillibrand said, after burning more jet fuel in one year than entire families do in a lifetime.

"Do as I say, not as I do," should be her campaign slogan.

I hope that 2019 will be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet