Leftists want Chris Hayes of MSNBC fired for doing journalism

Liberals and leftists are similar in much of their thinking, but the biggest difference is that liberals are sometimes willing to respectfully debate conservatives while leftists want conservatives silenced by any means necessary. The main reason for this is because leftists have no good arguments due to a severe lack of information on any given subject.

Chris Hayes of MSNBC, who is a "Never Trumper" and by no means a conservative, pissed off a lot of leftist viewers who support the "almost late" Joe Biden on Wednesday night when Hayes reported on the sexual assault allegations against Biden, according to The Hill.

After Hayes discussed the accusation made by former Biden staffer Tara Reade during a segment, #FireChrisHayes began trending on Twitter, because, as previously mentioned, leftists cannot tolerate an opposing opinion or a news story that attacks their low values.

The allegation against Biden came from a former Biden staffer who, in the early 1990s claims she was sexually assaulted by him. He allegedly had her up against a wall, put his hands up her dress and digitally penetrated her vagina. His campaign, who was not there, denied the allegation and on Friday, Biden denied it as well but is refusing to allow senate records to be made available.

Hayes was interviewing Rebecca Traister of New York Magazine about an article she wrote, titled, "The Biden Trap," which focused on Biden's silence about the allegation while his female supporters are questioned about it. This is what made leftists go bat-crap crazy.

"What this is creating is a kind of a perfect storm where the women who are being asked to support his opponent are now being asked to answer for these charges," Traister said. "In part because of the vacuum created by Joe Biden, who is not yet really directly answering these questions, and certainly, not doing what I wish he would, which is to say: 'Please direct your questions about these allegations to me, and not the women that are out there offering their support to my candidacy.'"

But why not direct questions to those women who say that we should believe all women? It shows their abject hypocrisy now that they have to do verbal calisthenics to defend Biden, an alleged sexual offender.

Hayes agreed with Traister that Biden should be forthcoming and address the issue himself and relieve the pressure of those hypocritical women: Stacey Abrams, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and others. 

Even this whiff of journalistic honesty was too much for leftists who were so quick to attack Justice Kavanaugh at his hearings when Christine Blasey Ford came forth with accusations that even her own witnesses denied ever happened.

So, it's believe all women who make sexual assault allegations only when those allegations are against a Republican.

They hypocrisy is palpable.

Biden is now trying to do a balancing act--believe all women but continue to maintain that Tara Reade is lying. Lucky for Sleepy Joe, the leftist media will not force him to go into any serious detail over the issue.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Gray Lady: Kamala Harris considers major move to back Biden

In a characteristically unprincipled move, by an obviously unprincipled politician, specifically, a woman who slept her way into politics, Kamala Harris seems to be edging toward a public endorsement of the person she referred to as a "racist," former Vice President Joe "Where the F**k Am I" Biden, according to The New York Times, a former newspaper and current birdcage liner.

As The New York Times explains it, the move “could enhance her chances of becoming vice president but could also anger liberals in California.”  

Citing “multiple Democratic officials familiar with her deliberations,” the rag [aka The Times] reported Thursday that Harris is “weighing an endorsement” of "Sleepy Joe." 

She referred to him as a racist in the first Democratic debate.

“Such a move could lift Mr. Biden’s campaign and perhaps do even more to enhance Ms. Harris’s chances of becoming vice president, but it could also anger her liberal base in California,” The Times’ Jonathan Martin wrote.

The good news is that Biden will probably not beat Trump in the election, and he might not even get the nomination as Bernie Sanders [pronounced "Sandahs"] is closing the idiot gap of people who believe he will help the country.

The officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, told the "Paper of Rectum" that if she does end up endorsing Biden, or any candidate for that matter, she will likely laugh inappropriately and then hold off until the Senate impeachment trial is over.

“Yet she and Mr. Biden, the former vice president, have remained in contact since she exited the race and had a long conversation in the immediate aftermath of her departure,” Martin writes. It is not alleged if they are being intimate, or if it is physically possible on Joe's part to be thus.

Democrats “close” to Harris [except for Willie Brown] told the rag that she is “mindful” that her endorsement would impact the remaining female senators in the race, Sen. Elizabeth "Dances Around Facts" Warren (D-MA) and Sen. Amy "Eat It With Your Hair Comb" Klobuchar (D-MN), and is “uneasy about the prospect of backing a candidate only to see him or her lose California.”

When asked if Biden would consider Harris as a running mate the confused former Vice President said, "Lemons are not always yellow. Did you know that? I kid you not. C'mon, man."

While Biden and Sanders contend for the top spot, the woman with the best shot at the nomination, Warren, has steadily lost ground, mainly because she is a disingenuous liar who is stiffer and less animated than Jeffrey Epstein was on the night of August 10, 2019.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings.

Tweet

The Gray Lady endorses 2 women for president

"All Left News That Fits We Print"

The Gray Lady, aka The New York Times, announced on Sunday that it was endorsing two women: a chronic liar and an angry staff abuser for the presidential nominations.

Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) both identify as women and both, coincidentally, have X-Y chromosomes, making them both biological women and not just women who are men that identify as women.

The Times' decision was immediately mocked on social media.

“In a break with convention, the editorial board has chosen to endorse two separate Democratic candidates for president,” the flaming leftists at the former newspaper wrote in red crayon.  “American voters must choose between three sharply divergent visions of the future.”

The Times went on to demonized all of President Donald Trump's accomplishments as racist and done out of “the veneration of a mythological past.” [By "President Donald Trump" the Times was referring to the Ku Klux Klan, which was a Democratic organization.]

The canary cage liner known as The Times correctly noted that all of the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates would be "the most" socialist "president in decades on issues like health care, the economy and government's allocation of resources." And when the government takes over our resources, they will take over all the means of production and the U.S.A. will be known as "Big Venezuela."

The Times wrote, and I will [often sarcastically] comment in brackets to provide the reader with clarity of fact:

There are legitimate questions about whether our democratic system is fundamentally broken. Our elections are getting less free and fair [because Hillary Clinton should have won in 2016 and the damn electoral college got in the way], Congress and the courts are increasingly partisan [because conservatives follow the U.S. Constitution as it was written and the left follows its need to virtue-signal], foreign nations are flooding society with misinformation [something they have done for centuries and now perfected by the Democrats], a deluge of money flows through our politics [while the Democrats pretend to be against money when it doesn't involve getting into their pockets]. And the economic mobility that made the American dream possible is vanishing [as evidenced by the astronomical growth of the global economy, the highest availability of jobs, the lowest unemployment among all groups of Americans, lower taxes keeping more money in the pockets of earners, and the growth of jobs coming back to America.]

Both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration. If there were ever a time to be open to new ideas, it is now. If there were ever a time to seek stability, now is it. [And by electing a socialist who will destabilize our economy and punish success, this will be achieved by the magic of hope for change.]

That’s why we’re endorsing the most effective advocates for each approach. They are Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. [Because nothing says effective like a spinner of tall tales like Elizabeth "Blowing Smoke" Warren and Amy Klobuchar, a thrower of inanimate objects and a screamer at her underlings.]

The Times joined the rest of the media in trying to put an end to Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders’ campaign, highlighting problems with his age, health, and style of politics. The Times wrote:

Mr. Sanders would be [a] 79 [-year-old Communist] when he assumed office, and after an October heart attack, his health is a serious concern, [unlike Hillary Clinton's health when her staff saved her from taking a header into an SUV when losing her equilibrium]. Then, there’s how Mr. Sanders approaches politics. He boasts that compromise is anathema to him. Only his [rather stupid and impractical] prescriptions can be the right ones, even though most are overly rigid, untested and divisive. He promises that once in office, a groundswell of support will emerge to push through his agenda [but to be fair, Obama promised the oceans would recede and the air would be peachy keen if you voted for him. How'd that work out?] Three years into the Trump administration, we see little advantage to exchanging one over-promising [by "over-promising" they mean promises a lot and actually delivers], divisive figure in Washington for another.

Senator Warren is a gifted storyteller. … [which is why her Indian name is "Throwing Bull"].

Even the left had a laugh at the lunacy.

Carol Roth tweeted:

This is so patronizing and cringey… they can’t even pick one. “Oh, let’s be progressive and pick a woman! Well, we don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings. Let’s pick both, they won’t mind…” https://t.co/l6xxtPUCmD
— Carol Roth (@caroljsroth) January 20, 2020

Even the executive director of the Sunrise Movement, which is slightly to the left of Stalin mockingly tweeted:

oh ya totally this makes sense https://t.co/HYGIk8TbRY
— Varshini Prakash (@VarshPrakash) January 20, 2020

Here's another:

Literally seconds from cancelling my subscription. https://t.co/rgrEnruAFr— Chris Martin Palmer (@ChrisPalmerNBA) January 20, 2020

And the mocking went on.

Suffice it to say, the New York Times is so far left, so bias against Trump and so far "in the bag" for Warren [they needed to include Klobuchar because they didn't want to come off as Warren's fan club] that they have reached a point of being a laughing stock.

Even the canaries are asking to change the paper.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings.

Tweet

Guess who's being blamed for the Walmart shooting

Just like the left would like to have the government take on all of the responsibilities of our lives, they want to make President Trump responsible for the behavior of a crazed mass shooter who killed 20 and wounded 26 in an El Paso Walmart on Saturday morning.

Predictably, the Democridiots jumped on the "Blame Trump for All Bad Behavior in America" bandwagon, even before all of the dead were removed from the scene. It's their go=to knee-jerk reaction because their actual ideas are untenable promises designed to get votes from a naive public.

And to blame anyone for the violence of another individual is not only stupid, it's immoral. Notice how quiet the left and the media was when a Bernie Sanders supporter shot up the Republican baseball game a few years ago, seriously injuring Steve Scalise.

Two immoral nonessential Democrats faced sharp criticism on social media Saturday after attempting to link the massacre to President Trump.

Sen. Amy ["the staff-abuser"] Klobuchar (D-MN), one of many socialists and Democrats hoping to block Trump's bid for a second term in the White House, made her remarks at a labor forum event in Las Vegas.

“The individuals who do the shootings are responsible," Klobuchar said, stating the obvious, "but I do think Trump's rhetoric has fueled more hate in this country.”Klobuchar, never letting a horrible tragedy go to waste, tweeted for gun reform legislation.

"Today innocent people—families—went to that mall in El Paso," she tweeted dramatically. "Some of them never came home. The U.S. House has passed common sense gun safety legislation. It is long past time to pass it in the Senate. The question to ask: Whose side are you on? The NRA’s or the people’s."

So not only is it President Trump's hatred that fueled the shooter, it's also the fault of the National Rifle Association because they teach gun safety and responsible gun ownership while advocating for the inalienable rights of the people under the U.S. Constitution.

Next we have Beto. An upward-bound loser who is also hoping to win the Democratic nomination for the 2020 presidential election and promises the country that he will eat dirt and say something in broken Spanish if he loses his bid.

Here's Beto after eating dirt

O'Rourke, whose real name is Robert Francis, not Beto, also blamed the president for the shooting while speaking Spanish and English in El Paso, which he represented when he was in Congress and later lost to Sen. Ted Cruz in a senatorial bid.

"He is a racist, and he stokes racism in this country," O'Rourke told reporters, as he stoked anti-Trump hatred in this country. "We've had a rise in hate crimes every single one of the last three years. During an administration where you've had the president call Mexicans rapists and criminals."While some on social media praised the candidates' comments, others criticized them for politicizing the shooting.

Actually, the Texas violent crime rate increased in 2015, possibly due to the serious decrease in the state's police force. with a police-to-population ratio that is the lowest in the nation.

But O'Rourke is to facts as oil is to water.

So people took to Twitter to comment on Klobuchar and O'Rourke:

“Amy! Thank you for all that you do and we need more! This president needs to be held accountable for these deaths and this carnage. He is complicit, he is an accessory to this crime as he instigates hate amongst his followers,” one willfully blind supporter tweeted.

Another responded to Klobuchar:

“I see you blamed President Trump as usual for supposed hate crime in shootings in El Paso GMAFB you Democrats always trying to get a Political over this BS. You have had years to fix the gun violence but you and all of congress can’t work,” one wrote.

One user said that Klobuchar is the one spouting hateful rhetoric.

“Ms klobuchar enough, don’t blame President Trump your hateful rhetoric fuels hate so just because your running for President,” the Twitter user wrote. "Better yet get on your knees and ask God for forgiveness since the Dems have taken God out of everything the devil is dancing.

"@BetoORourke Could you stop the politics long enough to be respectful to all that have been affected by this horrendous act of violence. R.E.S.P.E.C.T." another user tweeted.

At last week's presidential debates, Klobuchar said that she supports an assault weapons ban, but didn't explain what an assault weapon is--apparently, any weapon that fires as a semi-automatic weapon is an assault weapon in her mind. In actuality, a military-style assault weapon is one the fires automatically and usually contains a selector switch to allow it to fire semi-automatically. If you don't know the difference between these two functions, you probably shouldn't be discussing gun control. Klobuchar doesn't seem to know.

In the United States, automatic weapons [aka machine guns--those that keep firing as long as the trigger remains depressed] are already banned. A semi-automatic weapon requires a trigger pull for each round fired, but if you're reading Brain Flushings, you probably already know that.

Klobuchar also said that she would have universal background checks for gun buyers. Not many conservatives are against that, but let's not kid ourselves, the Democrats want total gun confiscation. And if this happens, only law abiding citizens will give up their guns while the lawless will keep them; only the lawful will be disarmed.

Klobuchar also criticized the president, saying he hadn't done enough in response to a shooting in Parkland, Fla., that left 17 people dead in 2018, but she did not criticize President Obama for the 156 mass shooting incidents that occurred during his watch in which four or more people were killed, not including the shooter. In total, there were 1,187 victims shot, 848 were killed, and 339 were shot and injured.

In 54 percent of cases, the shootings were related to domestic or family violence. In nearly half the cases--42 percent--the shooter showed warning signs before the shooting that indicated they posed a danger to themselves or others. Over a third of the shootings--34 percent--involved a shooter prohibited from possessing a firearm. The vast majority--63 percent--took place entirely in private homes.

So what is the solution? Here are a few ideas:

1. Background checks on all firearm sales. This should be a no brainer to prevent the wrong people, from buying guns.
2. Strong domestic violence laws to keep guns out of the hands of abusers.
3. Red flag laws that allow family members and law enforcement to seek at least a temporary removal of guns from those people who have exhibited recent dangerous behavior.

Some folks think that restricting magazine capacity to limit the number or rounds shooters can fire without reloading is also a good idea, but it takes just a few seconds for a practiced shooter to pop in another magazine and start shooting again.

The president reacted to the El Paso shooting on Twitter, writing, “Today’s shooting in El Paso, Texas, was not only tragic, it was an act of cowardice. I know that I stand with everyone in this Country to condemn today’s hateful act. There are no reasons or excuses that will ever justify killing innocent people....”


Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump

As this is being written, I have just learned of another shooting in Dayton, Ohio in which 9 people were killed, I believe. You know the words to the song the Democrats are going to sing, as usual.

But yes, some things need to be done, but gun confiscation or attacking the NRA are not any of those things.


Please consider following this blog and feel free to click on the ads on this page. It costs nothing, and may just save your life. Or not.







Tweet

After blasting Fox News, now Comrade de Blasio wants to do a town hall with them

"Worst Mayor Ever" Bill de Blasio [aka Warren Wilhelm Jr.] isn't just a tall incompetent loser, he also has an enormous set of cojones.

After accusing Fox News of spreading "overt hate" and calling them racially and politically divisive, the far-Left-leftist-socialist-commie scumquat approached the network, which is the top-rated cable news network in the USA, asking them if he could do a town hall.

Seriously.

The New York Times, a former newspaper, reported on the 2020 Democratic candidate's desire to appear on Fox, which a spokeswoman chalked up to a desire to reach as many voters as possible. De Blasio, who is hated even by those in New York City, which he has run into the ground,  is a current non-factor in the polls. With the anemic numbers he's running, he'd be lucky to  reach the first primary debate stage later this month.

Very few people like the leftist mayor--even the New York City Police Department have, in the past, literally turned their backs on him on two occasions: the first time in 2014 when Officers Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu were shot execution style by a cop-hating man after de Blasio characterized police as "the bad guys." And the second time the NYPD did the same was in 2017 when Officer Miosotis Familia was assassinated and de Blasio, rather than attend her funeral, opted instead to attend the G-20 summit.

"We want to talk to all voters about why the mayor is the best candidate for working people–regardless of what news channel they watch," de Blasio spokeswoman Olivia Lapeyrolerie said.

De Blasio has an incredible 8 percent favorability rating among voters, according to a recent Quinnipiac poll. Forty-five percent of voters have an unfavorable opinion and 48 percent don't know much about him.

So he's desperate to get his big butt out there and get on Fox, in spite of his hostile history to Rupert Murdoch's media outlets, particularly Fox News and the New York Post.

He said last year that Murdoch's News Corp was responsible for the political rise of President Trump and blamed it for dividing the country, which in psychological terms is known as projection.

Back last August, de Blasio was even more hostile to Murdoch's media outlets and told the Compromised News Network [CNN] that Murdoch's empire was the cause for "dividing people and creating hatred and negativity and changing our political landscape for the worse." In psychological terms this is what is known as delusion.

If News Corp didn't exist, "there would be less overt hate, there would be less appeal to racial division," he said, hoping to one day have the power to destroy all conservative news outlets and imprison all that work for them.

De Blasio has also attacked  the New York Post over its journalistic coverage of his City Hall. In 2016, he called it a "right-wing rag" and refused to answer a reporter's questions at a press conference because he didn't have a coherent answer and thought it was a trick question.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) became the fourth major Democratic presidential candidate to appear on Fox News for a town hall on Sunday, following Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and South Bend mayor Pete Buttigieg (Gay-IN). [I included "Gay" for Buttigieg because those are essentially all of his credentials for being president.]

Virtually all of these candidates attacked Fox News because the left expects them to do so and they all pander to the left and compromise all sense of decency.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has refused to accept an invitation to appear on Fox, calling it a "hate-for-profit scam" that is trying to use Democrats to bolster credibility with advertisers. She came up with that idea one full moon night, outside her wigwam near the campfire, as she smoked a spliff of peyote with the tribe's chief Running Left.

The Democratic National Committee has also blacklisted Fox News from conducting any Democratic primary debates because they ask real questions rather than questions like:

"Golf, what does it do for you?" -- CBS

 "I'm wondering if you think that [Republican presidential candidates are] uninformed, out of touch, or irresponsible?" -- CNN

There are so many more that you can see at the  Daily Caller. It's unbelievable that Warren could make such a statement with a straight, pale face [speaking of scams.]

So let me ask you: do you think Fox News should have de Blasio at a town hall?



Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey 
Thanks.




Tweet

Bobby [Bozo] O'Rourke would do Fox town hall

"Who sat on the mic?"

Former Texas Rep. and former U.S. Senatorial losing candidate, and former guitarist and failed writer,  Beto O'Rourke said Monday that he would be grateful to participate in a town hall hosted by Fox News because his poll numbers are so bad, it's possible that not even his wife would vote for him. Of course, she has an excuse--Beto tried to slip her a turd from their son's diaper and pretended it was a green avocado.

O'Rourke's willingness to go on Fox is a break with a number of his campaign rivals.

When asked at a campaign stop in Iowa about whether he'd be willing to appear on an actual non-leftist cable network, he told so-called reporters that he "absolutely" would be. 

After all, if he's willing to go on YouTube to show the American people that just like us, he gets his hair cut and goes to the dentist, why not go on Fox? 

Just hope he never goes for a colonoscopy.

“This campaign is about going to where people are, and you see that physically in where I show up [like he did in Mexico.] But it also has to be in those channels or those social media streams where people get their news and their information. That also includes Fox.”

Incidentally, more people watch Fox than any of those leftist networks.

The presidential hopeful said he was unaware of any current talks between his team and Fox News, which Democratic Party leadership said earlier this year was too biased to host any of its primary debates this cycle. Perhaps Fox doesn't want to waste their time with a loser.

O'Rourke's remarks come one day after South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D) participated in a town hall on the network that drew 1.1 million total viewers. It was a smart move on his part because if he screwed up, he could blame the conservative attackers at Fox [which of course Chris Wallace is not.] If he was successful [which it appears he was] he'd reach tons of folks.

Sens. Bernie "Comrade" Sanders (I-VT) and Amy "Clean This" Klobachar (D-MN) have also done events hosted by Fox News. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) will appear in a Fox News town hall on June 2 and I have already put that in my Google calendar to make sure I'm doing something else.

Other candidates, however, have refused to appear in the network's events.

Sen. Elizabeth "Dances with Heritage" Warren (D-MA) accused Fox News of being a "hate-for-profit machine" while saying that she would never appear in a town hall hosted by the network. She is kind of stupid if she really wants a shot at "Heap Big" prize of the Democratic nomination.

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) has also indicated she would refuse a town hall invitation because they might ask difficult questions.

Kindly consider following Brain Flushings and please visit the ads on these pages. Thank you.

Tweet

Dems block 'born alive' bill that would provide care to babies of failed murder attempts

I honestly don't know how some people can live with themselves. One day society is going to look back at our history and see us as savages who would murder our own children. Most animals don't do that, particularly animals with a fully developed frontal cortex, but we do. At least the far-left does.

Senate Democrats on Monday blocked a Republican bill that would have called for prison time for abortion doctors who don't attempt life saving procedures of infants born alive during failed attempts at murdering them.

How is this appealing to leftist voters?

All prominent Democratic 2020 presidential animals in the Senate voted down the measure, including socialist Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Kamala "I Slept My Way On Up" Harris of California, Cory "Spartacus" Booker of New Jersey, Kirsten "I Go All Ways" Gillibrand of New York, Amy "Wash This" Klobuchar of Minnesota and Elizabeth "Dances With Bull" Warren of Massachusetts. The final vote was 53-44 to end Democratic delaying tactics -- seven votes short of the 60 needed.

Three Democrats supported the Republican bill -- Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Bob Casey of Pennsylvania and Doug Jones or Alabama. Three Republicans did not vote, due to scheduling conflicts and plane flight delays: Kevin Cramer of North Dakota, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Tim Scott of South Carolina.

The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act would have required that "any health care practitioner present" at the time of a birth "exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child as a reasonably diligent and conscientious health care practitioner would render to any other child born alive at the same gestational age."

It's a baby. A child is born and you don't stand there and allow he or she to die.

President Trump tweeted:

Senate Democrats just voted against legislation to prevent the killing of newborn infant children. The Democrat position on abortion is now so extreme that they don’t mind executing babies AFTER birth.... 

....This will be remembered as one of the most shocking votes in the history of Congress. If there is one thing we should all agree on, it’s protecting the lives of innocent babies.

Yes, we're talking about innocent babies. There is simply no excuse for not passing this bill. None, because it isn't tied into another bill, it stands alone.

The bill, which exempted the mother involved in the birth from prosecution, also would have required practitioners to "ensure that the child born alive is immediately transported and admitted to a hospital." 

The bill prescribed a possible term of imprisonment of up to five years for violations, not including penalties for first-degree murder that could have applied.

Aside from Trump, other Republicans also couldn't believe the Democrat's refusal to agree to these terms. "I want to ask each and every one of my colleagues whether or not we're OK with infanticide," said the bill's chief sponsor, Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE).

Sasse spoke to Fox News' "The Story" after the vote, saying that he was "surprised" at each vote against the bill, and charged that opponents had lied "constantly" with "blatant nonsense" about the legislation -- specifically, by claiming the bill "would end abortion" entirely.

"This is about the most simple thing you can say, which is that a baby is a baby, and they have dignity and worth," Sasse said. "And it's not because they're powerful. It's because they're babies. Today is a sad day in the United States Senate."

Sasse added, "This shouldn't be about politics. ... This should be about having heart."

A panel of people who survived abortions

This should be about having even a modicum of morality.

Other pro-life activists called on the 44 senators who voted against Sasse's bill to resign immediately.

“Senators who could not bring themselves to vote to pass the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act should reconsider whether or not they have what it takes to serve," March for Life President Jeanne Mancini said in an understatement. 

"Senator Sasse’s common sense bill would merely require doctors assist a newborn struggling to survive after a failed attempt on her life. Anyone who lacks the basic level of human compassion needed to vote in favor of this should quickly find another job. We look forward to a vote in the House of Representatives so that Chamber can get on record as well.”

Opponents, noting the rarity of such births and citing laws already making it a crime to kill newborn babies, said the bill was unnecessary. But they still refused to sign it anyway.

They said it was part of a push by abortion opponents to curb access to the procedure and intimidate doctors who perform it, and said late-term abortions generally occur when the infant is considered incapable of surviving after birth.

“This bill is just another line of attack in the ongoing war on women’s health,” New Hampshire Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen said on the Senate floor.

Women's health? How? That's nonsense and a lie.

Sasse introduced the legislation after Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam, (D) endorsed post-birth abortions while discussing The Repeal Act, a state bill which sought to repeal restrictions on third-trimester abortions. Northam made headlines when his medical school yearbook had a photo of him in either blackface of a KKK outfit, which he apologized for then later denied.

Virginia Democratic Del. Kathy Tran, a cold blooded sponsor of that post-birth abortion bill, was asked at a hearing if a woman about to give birth and dilating could still request an abortion.

"My bill would allow that, yes,” Tran said. Northam, in a later interview with a radio station, backed up Tran. Both Northam and Tran clearly have the morals of mother crabs which eats their babies.

"When we talk about third-trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of, obviously, the mother, with the consent of the physicians, more than one physician, by the way," Northam said, referring to abortion doctors who get paid to kill babies. "And, it's done in cases where there may be severe deformities, there may be a fetus that's non-viable." 

Or just for the hell of it.

Northam continued: "So, in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother. So, I think this was really blown out of proportion."

It's so thoughtful to keep the INFANT comfortable before you kill it.

If you don't think this is evil, then I am at a loss for words.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Rep. Liz Cheney enters GND draft summary into Congressional Record for a good LOL

House Republicans announced on Wednesday that they have entered an outline of the sophomoric and controversial "Green New Deal" along with the list of frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding the Democratic's communist proposal into the Congressional Record. The document was deleted from the website of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, (Ditz-NY) because of the laughter it created when normal people read it, but the public, as well as the GOP, were able to capture it before it was "Bleach Bit" by the former bartender turned congresswoman.

"It's very important the American people see that there be transparency about what [Democrats] are pushing," Rep. Liz Cheney, (R-WY), said at the House GOP's weekly press conference. "And we call on [House] Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi, (D-CA), to put this up for a vote on the floor," Cheney said, taking a page out of the Sen. Mitch McConnell playbook.

"We think Democrats need to be held accountable. If they support this as they say they do and as their presidential candidates do," Cheney added," then let's have a vote on it and see to what extent they're all going to get behind moving toward this kind of fantasy."

It's about time the GOP grew some cajones, and it took a woman and "Cocaine Mitch" to do the job.

You can still view the  FAQs of the Green New Deal (GND) using the Wayback Machine. It's a hoot.

It describes the GND as "a 10-year plan to create a greenhouse gas neutral society" through what it describes as "a World War II scale mobilization that focuses the robust and creative economic engine of the United States on reversing climate change by fully rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure, restoring our natural ecosystems, dramatically expanding renewable power generation, overhauling our entire transportation system, upgrading all our buildings, jumpstarting US clean manufacturing (and) transforming US agriculture."

The "farting cows" part is the best, but Alexandria Occasionally Coherent-Cortex took it down from the website. It describes how eliminating farting cows will greatly reduce the methane on the planet, so we have to eliminate them.

The outline also says the Green New Deal would provide "(e)conomic security to all who are unable or unwilling to work." It also notes that the proposal's goal is "to get to net-zero, rather than zero emissions ... because we aren’t sure that we will be able to fully get rid of," because those cow farts and air travel emissions may take longer.

Cheney's request for Pelosi to put the Green New Deal resolution up for a vote on the House floor follows a similar move from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who said Tuesday that he would bring the matter before the upper chamber of Congress to "give everybody an opportunity to go on record."

The Green New Deal is already supported by at least five senators seeking the Democratic nomination for president: Cory "Spartacus" Booker of New Jersey, Kirsten "Both Sides Now" Gillibrand of New York, Kamala "The Narc" Harris of California, Elizabeth "Dances Like White Woman" Warren of Massachusetts and Amy "Throws Binders" Klobuchar of Minnesota. Vermont Independent Sen. Bernie "Russian Cold Nipples" Sanders, who could also enter the Democratic primary, is another supporter.

A seventh potential candidate in 2020, Ohio Democratic Sen. Sherrod "?" Brown, pointedly declined Tuesday to attach his name and dismissed liberal activists' contention that he has to support the Green New Deal in order to prove his commitment to the issue.

"I don't need to co-sponsor every bill that others think they need to co-sponsor to show my progressive politics," Brown nervously told reporters.

Meanwhile, Kamala Harris fired up a doobie and listened to Tupac and some Slick Rick in her crib.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet