Alexandria Obviously-Compromised gets brutally attacked by both sides about her hypocrisy

It was an old 'Ripley's Believe it or Not' that once made the claim that if you took all the Chinese people in the world and had them march four-abreast over a cliff, they would never stop marching. Of course, with the new one-baby rule in China, this may no longer be true, but there's a similar thought when it comes to politicians and hypocrisy: if you took all the phony liars and hypocrites in politics and lined them up and hanged them, you would never have enough rope and  you'd run out of trees.

Enter Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Socialist-NY). 

On Wednesday, when AOC honked her Marxist town hall spiel at the Bronxdale High School in the Bronx, NY, her protégés on the left and some on the right rightfully blasted her.

The Leftists got to their feet and ripped her a new one for her failures in office and hypocrisy. He opulent support of the war in Ukraine, for example, when she had pretended to be a bulwark of anti-war sentiment was a key issue. She claimed to be an outsider when she first ran for office, and now she's voting with the hawks to fund Ukraine's war effort against Russia and bringing us closer to armageddon. 

Not so ironically, some of AOC's previous admirers now support Tusi Gabbard who recently left the Democratic Party.

My friend @Noggatone and I confronted Congresswoman @AOC on her support for Nuclear War and Ukrainian Nazis. I call her out for being a coward in the face of the party that will push us all into Nuclear war right now. Will she stand up like @TulsiGabbard and fight for peace? pic.twitter.com/aQiQvQSWIN

— Jose Vega – Vote Diane Sare! (@JosBtrigga)

At the Bronx town hall one of the guys shouted, “Tulsi Gabbard has shown guts, where you have shown cowardice. I believed in you and you became the very thing you sought to fight against. 

"You are the establishment,” the guy shouted, cutting her with one of the worst things a leftist can throw at another leftist and saying she would lead us to a “nuclear war.” “This is the only thing that matters,” he said.

Hey, hey, ho, ho, AOC has gotta go!

Her comeback was awesome: "You are being rude," she said. In the past she had also said that in order to deal with your opponents, you need to be rude. Her response was weak and totally inadequate.

“Tulsi Gabbard, she’s left the Democratic Party because they are war hawks,” one man shouted. “You ran as an outsider, yet you’ve been voting to start this war in Ukraine.”

Former AOC allies are now openly defying her publicly and that's a huge change from what the consequences for doing that would have been in the past. 

What used to be the Democrat's shooting star is now a threatening asteroid and the Dems are sending Dart missiles to destroy her. 

She is burnt toast.

Last night AOC told an antiwar protester that he was 'being rude'. Rudeness is what she advocated in her early days. (see below) #UkraineRussianWar #RussiaUkraineWar #AOC https://t.co/nfOLxTB8gs pic.twitter.com/PuaXExg6Ad

— Antiwar.com (@Antiwarcom) October 14, 2022

Just five years ago, AOC was trying to reach out to the anti-war community. Now she scoffs at us, calls us rude, and thinks we are in the way of her pursuit for more power. This is why we never can trust Democrats: They only exist to serve the interests of the elites and the MIC. https://t.co/8UH36D2F2y

— Bane (@dink________) October 13, 2022

It’s only “rude” when her butt is nailed for her hypocrisy.

Some on the right have also weighed in on AOC's hypocrisy. 

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Critical Race Theory, ignorance, The New York Times, and bovine flatulence. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) said comrade Cortez hadn't spent much time with her constituents and they just reminded her that she has sold them out. “She ran as an outsider and has now just morphed into #SandyPelosi,” Boebert said.

She may hold town halls but if you call concerned constituents rude, you are not helping yourself politically.

Toast, I tell you. Toast.

Tweet

Biden, as sharp at a cue ball

C'mon, man

President Biden appeared on the Comedy News Network in a town hall hosted by the semi-talented Don Lemon. While you can tell that he did his best to cover for Biden, he couldn't do so at times without interrupting him, so he let the president ramble on.

Lemon to President Biden: "Let me ask. Let me ask, let me follow up on her [a woman asking Biden at the town hall] question and ask you when will children under 12 be able to get vaccinated?"

Biden's answer was deep:

"Soon, I believe. Now look, one of the things that I committed to do when I got elected, I said ... The answer, soon in the sense that I do not tell any scientists what they should do, I do not interfere. And so, they are doing, they’re doing the examinations now, the testing now and making the decision now. When they are ready, when they’ve done all the scientific need be done to determine children at ages 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, they, in fact, are, all have different makeups, they’re developing, they’re trying to figure out whether or not there’s a vaccination that would affect one child with, that’s at such and such an age and not another child."

Seriously, this is verbatim and if this doesn't get you to be concerned, you may be a Russian or China operative.

This is the President of the United States talking here. Talking gibberish. Talking word salad.

If he finishes out his first term, it would be, now look, c'mon man, You know. . . That.

Why not consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against ignorance and evil.

Tweet

Biden crushes it on Compromised News Network's town hall with Don LeMon

Compromised News Network promoted their Wednesday town hall event with Co-President Biden like sex workers at Boys' Town announcing their visit. The network even went so far as to feature the incredible Don LeMon with all his tough questions and words and stuff, while the crowd, albeit small enough to fit on the roof of a bus in Delhi, was enthusiastic and were able to pay attention without nodding off.

The saddest part was that Hunter couldn't be at the event as he was too busy blowing highly prized paint bubbles on canvas through a straw that was not in his nose.

Incredibly, not many on the right were surprised by Joe's lack of sentience and assiduous verbal clarity. The worst job one can have in his administration would be either Biden's foreign language interpreter, or his hand signer for the deaf. Sometimes however, his answers make some sense, and that's when they are the most frightening.

Jack Butler editor for the National Review, called the town hall the "contrived" CNN event, and said it was a far cry from past town halls. He believes the format itself should be abolished and called it a "hideous spectacle unbecoming of a self-governing republic" that continues to devolve.

"With the help of the mawkish sheen inculcated by the format, Biden largely skated through a kind of CliffsNotes of current events by invoking either his preferred cliché or talking point of the moment or a variety of emotional or ironic rhetorical devices as he saw fit," Butler wrote.

"If CNN had any shame or respect for the citizens of a self-governing republic, the network would never air one of these idiotic events again," Butler added. "But don’t expect that to happen anytime soon."

Dan Bongino in the  Bongino Report declared the event was a "train wreck," while Media Research Center president Brent Bozell referred to it as "garbage."

But you have to expect conservatives to go after CNN and President Biden even if they're attacking an old clearly dementia-addled guy and an angry, gay leftist Democratic operative.

Toward the end of the town hall, President Biden spotted a rather large cockroach near his shoe and the "Big Guy" casually crushed it.

Why not consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against ignorance and evil.

Tweet

After blasting Fox News, now Comrade de Blasio wants to do a town hall with them

"Worst Mayor Ever" Bill de Blasio [aka Warren Wilhelm Jr.] isn't just a tall incompetent loser, he also has an enormous set of cojones.

After accusing Fox News of spreading "overt hate" and calling them racially and politically divisive, the far-Left-leftist-socialist-commie scumquat approached the network, which is the top-rated cable news network in the USA, asking them if he could do a town hall.

Seriously.

The New York Times, a former newspaper, reported on the 2020 Democratic candidate's desire to appear on Fox, which a spokeswoman chalked up to a desire to reach as many voters as possible. De Blasio, who is hated even by those in New York City, which he has run into the ground,  is a current non-factor in the polls. With the anemic numbers he's running, he'd be lucky to  reach the first primary debate stage later this month.

Very few people like the leftist mayor--even the New York City Police Department have, in the past, literally turned their backs on him on two occasions: the first time in 2014 when Officers Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu were shot execution style by a cop-hating man after de Blasio characterized police as "the bad guys." And the second time the NYPD did the same was in 2017 when Officer Miosotis Familia was assassinated and de Blasio, rather than attend her funeral, opted instead to attend the G-20 summit.

"We want to talk to all voters about why the mayor is the best candidate for working people–regardless of what news channel they watch," de Blasio spokeswoman Olivia Lapeyrolerie said.

De Blasio has an incredible 8 percent favorability rating among voters, according to a recent Quinnipiac poll. Forty-five percent of voters have an unfavorable opinion and 48 percent don't know much about him.

So he's desperate to get his big butt out there and get on Fox, in spite of his hostile history to Rupert Murdoch's media outlets, particularly Fox News and the New York Post.

He said last year that Murdoch's News Corp was responsible for the political rise of President Trump and blamed it for dividing the country, which in psychological terms is known as projection.

Back last August, de Blasio was even more hostile to Murdoch's media outlets and told the Compromised News Network [CNN] that Murdoch's empire was the cause for "dividing people and creating hatred and negativity and changing our political landscape for the worse." In psychological terms this is what is known as delusion.

If News Corp didn't exist, "there would be less overt hate, there would be less appeal to racial division," he said, hoping to one day have the power to destroy all conservative news outlets and imprison all that work for them.

De Blasio has also attacked  the New York Post over its journalistic coverage of his City Hall. In 2016, he called it a "right-wing rag" and refused to answer a reporter's questions at a press conference because he didn't have a coherent answer and thought it was a trick question.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) became the fourth major Democratic presidential candidate to appear on Fox News for a town hall on Sunday, following Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and South Bend mayor Pete Buttigieg (Gay-IN). [I included "Gay" for Buttigieg because those are essentially all of his credentials for being president.]

Virtually all of these candidates attacked Fox News because the left expects them to do so and they all pander to the left and compromise all sense of decency.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has refused to accept an invitation to appear on Fox, calling it a "hate-for-profit scam" that is trying to use Democrats to bolster credibility with advertisers. She came up with that idea one full moon night, outside her wigwam near the campfire, as she smoked a spliff of peyote with the tribe's chief Running Left.

The Democratic National Committee has also blacklisted Fox News from conducting any Democratic primary debates because they ask real questions rather than questions like:

"Golf, what does it do for you?" -- CBS

 "I'm wondering if you think that [Republican presidential candidates are] uninformed, out of touch, or irresponsible?" -- CNN

There are so many more that you can see at the  Daily Caller. It's unbelievable that Warren could make such a statement with a straight, pale face [speaking of scams.]

So let me ask you: do you think Fox News should have de Blasio at a town hall?



Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey 
Thanks.




Tweet

Gillibrand lies about guns, the NRA, and gets called out

People who a clueless are clueless of their cluelessness. Democratic presidential candidate who is currently polling in the high zeros is Sen. Kirsten "I'm Flexible" Gillibrand (D-NY). She has taken more positions than the Kama Sutra and is a lot less interesting.

Gillibrand told a string of lies about U.S. firearm laws and the National Rifle Association. Maybe she was just "shooting from the hip" but she doesn't seem to know what she was talking about in the Fox News town hall on Sunday hosted by Chris Wallace. And while Wallace is not a fierce conservative, he called her out on her statements.

Gillibrand has repeatedly lied about firearms and the NRA on the campaign trail, and she repeated many of her debunked lies on Sunday night because she, like most people in her party, believe all liberals are low-information voters.

"The NRA is the worst organization in this country," Gillibrand said. "They care more about their profits than the American people. They care more about selling guns to someone on the terror watch list or someone with grave mental illness or who has a violent criminal background."

The NRA is a non-profit organization and they do not sell firearms, so Gillibrand is either a liar or a moron--but of course, both things can be true at the same time.

Gillibrand's claim that NRA wants to sell guns to "someone on the terror watch list" is laughably false. FiveThirtyEight reports:

But civil liberties and gun rights groups are critical of the list. ... But the ACLU, citing secret documents released by the journalism site The Intercept, was critical in 2014 of the growing numbers of people on the watch list, saying there are no clear standards by which to determine who is placed in a database that can be used for religious and racial profiling. The rights of American citizens to contest their possible inclusion on the list is infringed because of the list’s secrecy, the ACLU said.

Gillibrand twisted what the NRA actually said. They don't want terrorists being allowed to buy guns, but they don't believe the terror watch list is the way to go to stop them because some names on that list are there by mistake. In a statement on Wednesday, the group said that “due process protections should be put in place that allow law-abiding Americans who are wrongly put on a watch list to be removed.”

Also, the law is very clear. According to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, violent criminals are already prohibited from owning firearms, as are people who have "grave mental illness," assuming that they have been "adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution."

The problem is not legal firearms, it's the illegal ones that kill the innocent victims most of the time.

Later during the town hall, after Gillibrand made additional false claims, Gillibrand made false claims about the Trump administration.

"Remember, after the shooting in Las Vegas [Trump] said, ‘we’re going to ban the bump stocks.’ Did he ban the bump stocks? No! Because the NRA came crashing down."

She lied.

The Trump administration did ban bump stocks after the shooting and the ban just went into effect earlier this year. The NRA did nothing to intervene on the issue.

"The NRA is lying to the American people, it is not about the Second Amendment. … [The NRA] wants to make sure an abuser who has a restraining order against him can buy a weapon," Gillibrand, who was lying to the American people, falsely said.

As stated in its bylaws, the NRA exists to "protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, especially with reference to the inalienable right of the individual American citizen guaranteed by such Constitution to acquire, possess, collect, exhibit, transport, carry, transfer ownership of, and enjoy the right to use arms, in order that the people may always be in a position to exercise their legitimate individual rights of self-preservation and defense of family, person, and property, as well as to serve effectively in the appropriate militia for the common defense of the Republic and the individual liberty of its citizens."

Wallace called out Gillibrand for her total screwup on the issue of guns and said, “It sounds a lot more like it’s politics than principles… how do you explain the change?”


When she was a representative in a conservative district, Gillibrand loved the NRA and supported gun rights, which the NRA reminded her of on Monday.

Maybe we should call her "Pander Bear."


Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey 
Thanks.

Tweet

Beto compares his job in Congress to charitable giving

Democratic former darling for presidential candidate Robert F. "Beto" O'Rourke compared his job in Congress to a charitable contribution, like actually giving money to charity without having to give actual money. He said this on Tuesday in response to a critic of his paltry charitable giving.

O'Rourke, a former Texas congressman has been the receptacle of ire over his 2017 tax return. He and his heiress wife Amy donated $1,166 from their $366,455 adjusted gross income that year to charity, totaling just 0.3 percent of their income.

A town hall attendee at the University of Virginia asked Beto why her sister, a recent college graduate, made far less than he and his wife did, but gave more to charity.

His answer really sucked:

"I've served in public office since 2005. I do my best to contribute to the success of my community, my state and now, of my country. There are ways that I do this that are measurable. And there are ways that I do this that are immeasurable."

Except when it comes to actually contributing to charity.

O'Rourke added there were some charities they donated to which they hadn't recorded and itemized to write off on their taxes, such as a homeless man to whom they provided a warm and friendly cup of Starbucks grande vento latte cappoconchino sapporino. "At six buck a cup, that's darned generous," he told the questioner as he muttered an expletive under his breath that starts with the letter "b."

He went on to say he was sacrificing at that moment by being out on the campaign trail rather than home with his family and having his wife have all the fun taking care of the kids and eating what looks like green avocado that Beto gave her.

"I will tell you, I'm doing everything that I can right now, spending this time with you—not with our kiddos, not back home in El Paso—because I want to sacrifice everything to make sure that we meet this moment of truth with everything that we've got," O'Rourke said, being the schmuck he will never see himself as.

While O'Rourke's continued to fundraise above his pay grade and qualifications, he's been criticized for having a lack of substance, lack of ideas, and also been hit from the left for taking more centrist and corporatist positions in the past and eating dirt.

Beto O'Rourke is the idos of "empty suit" and will probably be nothing more than an asterisk in this campaign.


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Trump slams Fox News and 'Smiley' Bret Baier, who responds

Seriously? Does President Trump want to go after the only TV network and news organization that has been his best ally? Is he that thin skinned?

President Trump took to Twitter to attack "Special Report" host Bret Baier along with the network on Tuesday after Monday night's town hall event with socialist lunatic Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and currently the person who's leading the pack in the contentious 2020 presidential campaign.


Trump expressed his ire with the "smiley" Baier’s alleged "soft questioning" of Sanders and Fox’s overall recent bent, citing the hiring of disgraced CNN contributor and Democratic operative Donna Brazile.

Trump tweeted:

"So weird to watch Crazy Bernie on [Fox News]. Not surprisingly, [Bret Baier] and the 'audience' was so smiley and nice. Very strange, and now we have [Donna Brazile]?"

Baier shot back on Twitter mere hours later:

"Thanks for watching Mr. President – we’d love to have you on a town hall soon — or even an interview on ["Special Report"] — it’s been awhile. We cover all sides."

Baier, alongside "The Story" host Martha MacCallum, moderated the town hall event for Sen. Sanders. The event's audience constituted a diverse crowd, but comprised mostly fans of Sanders, it appeared. They hooted and hollered at everything he said without even using the letter "R.

I'm a Trump supporter but I hope he stops attacking people inside the tent.


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Donna Brazile pulled "a Hillary"

Donna Brazile, formerly of CNN (Clinton News Network) and now the Democratic Party leader, claimed to the world that emails showing her apparently giving Hillary Clinton questions at a March town hall were "doctored." 

In order to check out the veracity of her claim, tech forensic experts went to work, and they are now saying that they've found proof the emails were authentic, which proves Brazile did "a Hillary" with the truth.

On a TV interview with Fox News, Megyn Kelly questioned Brazile about an email that surfaced from Campaign Chairman John Podesta's email account and attributed to Brazile which was posted on WikiLeaks, an internet website headed by Julian Assange (who Hillary Clinton wanted to "drone"). 

The email was passed on to campaign adviser Jennifer Palmieri about the death penalty, under the subject line: "From time to time I get questions in advance."

Soon after the email was sent, the March town hall was hosted by CNN and TV One. A similar question was asked by Roland Martin, but Brazile vehemently denied receiving questions from CNN. "I have seen so many doctored emails. I have seen things that come from me at 2 in the morning that I don't even send," she said. "I will not sit here and be persecuted, because your information is totally false."

But of course it was not false--Donna Brazile's indignation was false.

Tech blog Errata Security quickly found the email in question could be verified by using an ordinary verification program.

DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) is a system verification system used by many email servers, among them is HillaryClinton.com. It is used to avoid spam filters whereby the system sends a DKIM "key" to the receiver to verify the sender and confirm the email hasn't been tampered with.

Bloggers ran the DKIM keys that were included with this and other emails through the verification software and it validated the Palmieri email as both real and undoctored.

Cybersecurity expert Robert Graham presented his results and showed that if the emails had been in any way altered, the software would have declared the emails unverified. The whole procedure took about five minutes, he told Fox News.

So it's obvious Brazile lied.

When asked if it was possible that WikiLeaks could have been hacked too, Graham said that it was very unlikely because to do so, the hacker would have needed access to the HillaryClinton.com server.

Graham is so confident in his finding that he posted a $600 BitCoin challenge for anyone who can alter an email and still have it come up as verified after being run through DKIM software.

So far, no takers.

It seems that Donald Trump has a good case to make about the election and media being rigged. This is not the America I grew up in--this America is becoming like a Third World nation and it saddens me.




Tweet