Brazile bagged for second email with debate question

If you believe the emails released by WikiLeaks are genuine, whether or not the Russians hacked them, you might be surprised to learn that another leaked email shows that Donna Brazile gave the Hillary Clinton campaign a second debate question in advance.

The WikiLeaks document release Monday shows that Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled: "One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash," the night prior to the March 6th CNN (Clinton News Network) primary debate in Flint, Michigan.  

"Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint," Brazile's email stated.

The following night the question proved to be accurate. Lee-Anne Walters, a mother of twin boys who stopped growing and her daughter lost her hair during the Flint water contamination crisis. She posed the question to both Clinton and Sanders: "After my family, the city of Flint and the children in D.C. were poisoned by lead, will you make a personal promise to me right now that, as president, in your first 100 days in office, you will make it a requirement that all public water systems must remove all lead service lines throughout the entire United States, and notification made to the citizens that have said service lines?" Walters asked.

Clinton's answer to the question was so detailed and lengthy that Anderson Cooper had to interrupt her twice to attempt keeping her to the agreed-upon time limit. The crowd cheered but she still lost the state's primary to the socialist Sanders.

The alleged tip-off was found in the load of messages hacked from Clinton's Campaign Manager Chairman John Podesta's Gmail account. 

In the same month, Brazile was accused of tipping off the Clinton machine with a question she sent to Clinton campaign adviser Jennifer Palmieri. The subject line of that email read: "From time to time I get the questions in advance." She then sent the question which dealt with the death penalty.

After Palmieri responded back, Brazile wrote "I'll send a few more."

CNN's Roland Martin asked the death penalty question verbatim the following night during a CNN town hall.

Brazile, who appeared Oct. 19th on Fox News Channel's Megyn Kelly, naturally denied helping Hillary during the primaries and attacked Kelly for even asking the question. 

Brazile's indignation is laughable.

"As a Christian woman, I understand persecution, but I will not sit here and be persecuted," she huffed. "Your information is totally false," she lied.

Donna Brazile is a disgrace to her party, journalism and Christianity.

CNN announced in a statement Monday after the email became public that Brazile had tendered her resignation and CNN accepted it on October 14th a few days after the  Brazile tip-off first broke.


Tweet

Donna Brazile pulled "a Hillary"

Donna Brazile, formerly of CNN (Clinton News Network) and now the Democratic Party leader, claimed to the world that emails showing her apparently giving Hillary Clinton questions at a March town hall were "doctored." 

In order to check out the veracity of her claim, tech forensic experts went to work, and they are now saying that they've found proof the emails were authentic, which proves Brazile did "a Hillary" with the truth.

On a TV interview with Fox News, Megyn Kelly questioned Brazile about an email that surfaced from Campaign Chairman John Podesta's email account and attributed to Brazile which was posted on WikiLeaks, an internet website headed by Julian Assange (who Hillary Clinton wanted to "drone"). 

The email was passed on to campaign adviser Jennifer Palmieri about the death penalty, under the subject line: "From time to time I get questions in advance."

Soon after the email was sent, the March town hall was hosted by CNN and TV One. A similar question was asked by Roland Martin, but Brazile vehemently denied receiving questions from CNN. "I have seen so many doctored emails. I have seen things that come from me at 2 in the morning that I don't even send," she said. "I will not sit here and be persecuted, because your information is totally false."

But of course it was not false--Donna Brazile's indignation was false.

Tech blog Errata Security quickly found the email in question could be verified by using an ordinary verification program.

DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) is a system verification system used by many email servers, among them is HillaryClinton.com. It is used to avoid spam filters whereby the system sends a DKIM "key" to the receiver to verify the sender and confirm the email hasn't been tampered with.

Bloggers ran the DKIM keys that were included with this and other emails through the verification software and it validated the Palmieri email as both real and undoctored.

Cybersecurity expert Robert Graham presented his results and showed that if the emails had been in any way altered, the software would have declared the emails unverified. The whole procedure took about five minutes, he told Fox News.

So it's obvious Brazile lied.

When asked if it was possible that WikiLeaks could have been hacked too, Graham said that it was very unlikely because to do so, the hacker would have needed access to the HillaryClinton.com server.

Graham is so confident in his finding that he posted a $600 BitCoin challenge for anyone who can alter an email and still have it come up as verified after being run through DKIM software.

So far, no takers.

It seems that Donald Trump has a good case to make about the election and media being rigged. This is not the America I grew up in--this America is becoming like a Third World nation and it saddens me.




Tweet

Bill, Bull and Gruber

What do you get when you put Chris "Tingles" Matthews, Roland Martin and Bill Maher in the same room?

You get more arrogance than farts in the toilet of an Irish pub on March 17th.

These libtards appeared on Maher's show "Real Time" last Friday and spoke about "The Wheeze" aka Jonathan Gruber. You know Gruber, he's the MIT genius who helped put together that clusterflub ObamaCare and talked on video about how the "lack of transparency" along with "the stupidity of the American voter" was needed to help get ObamaCare passed.

All three liberal, progressive Obama buttboys agreed that Americans really are stupid. But the funniest part of all was when Maher's audience laughed in agreement that they are stupid, proving Maher's point.

"Gruber was right. He just said what people don't want to hear," Maher said. The crowd just sat there guffawing and picking snot rockets, totally unaware he was speaking about them--the voters who supported ObamaCare.

Chrissy tried to deny calling Americans stupid but the group ganged up on him and he relented. In the military we had a name for people like Matthews, but I'll leave it to your imagination.

In my estimation Maher and his cretin panel are partially correct: some Americans are stupid, just like some Americans are racist. It's a numbers game. The thing is, the Americans who are stupid and also tend to be the actual racists liberals love to accuse (because they must bring race into every conversation) are the leftists who support idiots like Maher who makes his money from them while calling them stupid.


Tweet