Trump does 'about face' on issue of foreign interference

In the spirit of Joe Biden and most other politicians (except for the crazy socialists like Bernie Sanders), President Trump has walked back what he said on ABC to former Director of Communications for the Clinton administration, George Stephanopoulos earlier this week.

Specifically, Trump said that if was told by a foreign source that they had information on one of his political opponents, would he accept it and would he contact the FBI. He said that he would be willing to listen to a foreign entity with damaging information saying "there isn't anything wrong with it." 

Other than it being immoral and potentially damaging politically due to the hostile media that actually found Trump to be at fault when Iran mined two ships in the Straits of Hormuz this week. In other words, anything that goes wrong or is wrong with the world, is somehow Trump's fault.

On Friday in a Fox News interview, the president, singing a totally different tune, said that he would "of course" contact authorities.

In the initial interview with ABC, he said he disagreed with his FBI Director Christopher Wray's position that if approached by foreign entities, political campaigns should report suspicious communications from them.

Those comments drew sharp criticism from the hypocritical Democrats, who said Trump was giving Russia a green light to interfere in the 2020 presidential election. They failed to condemn Hillary Clinton's use of the foreign national, Christopher Steele, with the Steele dossier, when her campaign used him for opposition research for the 2016 campaign and for which the Mueller probe was based on.

Trump did his "about face" Friday telling Fox News, "Of course, you have to look at it . . . but of course, you give it to the FBI or report it to the attorney general or somebody like that. You couldn't have that happen with our country, and everybody understands that," he said.

“If I thought anything was incorrect or badly stated," he stated imprecisely, "I’d report it to the attorney general, the FBI. I’d report it to law enforcement, absolutely.”

Former Vice President Joe Biden, the current frontrunner at the moment for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, countered Trump on Friday by releasing a video statement on Twitter pledging to not use misinformation in his campaign or tolerate outside interference.

Trump was “dead wrong,” Biden said. “I won’t be part of any attempt to undermine our democracy or public confidence in our institutions.”

Biden's presidential platform seems to be that a) Orange man bad; b) I will cure cancer if you elect me, but not before then; c) Orange man very bad.

Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey
Thanks

Tweet

After blasting Fox News, now Comrade de Blasio wants to do a town hall with them

"Worst Mayor Ever" Bill de Blasio [aka Warren Wilhelm Jr.] isn't just a tall incompetent loser, he also has an enormous set of cojones.

After accusing Fox News of spreading "overt hate" and calling them racially and politically divisive, the far-Left-leftist-socialist-commie scumquat approached the network, which is the top-rated cable news network in the USA, asking them if he could do a town hall.

Seriously.

The New York Times, a former newspaper, reported on the 2020 Democratic candidate's desire to appear on Fox, which a spokeswoman chalked up to a desire to reach as many voters as possible. De Blasio, who is hated even by those in New York City, which he has run into the ground,  is a current non-factor in the polls. With the anemic numbers he's running, he'd be lucky to  reach the first primary debate stage later this month.

Very few people like the leftist mayor--even the New York City Police Department have, in the past, literally turned their backs on him on two occasions: the first time in 2014 when Officers Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu were shot execution style by a cop-hating man after de Blasio characterized police as "the bad guys." And the second time the NYPD did the same was in 2017 when Officer Miosotis Familia was assassinated and de Blasio, rather than attend her funeral, opted instead to attend the G-20 summit.

"We want to talk to all voters about why the mayor is the best candidate for working people–regardless of what news channel they watch," de Blasio spokeswoman Olivia Lapeyrolerie said.

De Blasio has an incredible 8 percent favorability rating among voters, according to a recent Quinnipiac poll. Forty-five percent of voters have an unfavorable opinion and 48 percent don't know much about him.

So he's desperate to get his big butt out there and get on Fox, in spite of his hostile history to Rupert Murdoch's media outlets, particularly Fox News and the New York Post.

He said last year that Murdoch's News Corp was responsible for the political rise of President Trump and blamed it for dividing the country, which in psychological terms is known as projection.

Back last August, de Blasio was even more hostile to Murdoch's media outlets and told the Compromised News Network [CNN] that Murdoch's empire was the cause for "dividing people and creating hatred and negativity and changing our political landscape for the worse." In psychological terms this is what is known as delusion.

If News Corp didn't exist, "there would be less overt hate, there would be less appeal to racial division," he said, hoping to one day have the power to destroy all conservative news outlets and imprison all that work for them.

De Blasio has also attacked  the New York Post over its journalistic coverage of his City Hall. In 2016, he called it a "right-wing rag" and refused to answer a reporter's questions at a press conference because he didn't have a coherent answer and thought it was a trick question.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) became the fourth major Democratic presidential candidate to appear on Fox News for a town hall on Sunday, following Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and South Bend mayor Pete Buttigieg (Gay-IN). [I included "Gay" for Buttigieg because those are essentially all of his credentials for being president.]

Virtually all of these candidates attacked Fox News because the left expects them to do so and they all pander to the left and compromise all sense of decency.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has refused to accept an invitation to appear on Fox, calling it a "hate-for-profit scam" that is trying to use Democrats to bolster credibility with advertisers. She came up with that idea one full moon night, outside her wigwam near the campfire, as she smoked a spliff of peyote with the tribe's chief Running Left.

The Democratic National Committee has also blacklisted Fox News from conducting any Democratic primary debates because they ask real questions rather than questions like:

"Golf, what does it do for you?" -- CBS

 "I'm wondering if you think that [Republican presidential candidates are] uninformed, out of touch, or irresponsible?" -- CNN

There are so many more that you can see at the  Daily Caller. It's unbelievable that Warren could make such a statement with a straight, pale face [speaking of scams.]

So let me ask you: do you think Fox News should have de Blasio at a town hall?



Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey 
Thanks.




Tweet

Brazile bagged for second email with debate question

If you believe the emails released by WikiLeaks are genuine, whether or not the Russians hacked them, you might be surprised to learn that another leaked email shows that Donna Brazile gave the Hillary Clinton campaign a second debate question in advance.

The WikiLeaks document release Monday shows that Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled: "One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash," the night prior to the March 6th CNN (Clinton News Network) primary debate in Flint, Michigan.  

"Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint," Brazile's email stated.

The following night the question proved to be accurate. Lee-Anne Walters, a mother of twin boys who stopped growing and her daughter lost her hair during the Flint water contamination crisis. She posed the question to both Clinton and Sanders: "After my family, the city of Flint and the children in D.C. were poisoned by lead, will you make a personal promise to me right now that, as president, in your first 100 days in office, you will make it a requirement that all public water systems must remove all lead service lines throughout the entire United States, and notification made to the citizens that have said service lines?" Walters asked.

Clinton's answer to the question was so detailed and lengthy that Anderson Cooper had to interrupt her twice to attempt keeping her to the agreed-upon time limit. The crowd cheered but she still lost the state's primary to the socialist Sanders.

The alleged tip-off was found in the load of messages hacked from Clinton's Campaign Manager Chairman John Podesta's Gmail account. 

In the same month, Brazile was accused of tipping off the Clinton machine with a question she sent to Clinton campaign adviser Jennifer Palmieri. The subject line of that email read: "From time to time I get the questions in advance." She then sent the question which dealt with the death penalty.

After Palmieri responded back, Brazile wrote "I'll send a few more."

CNN's Roland Martin asked the death penalty question verbatim the following night during a CNN town hall.

Brazile, who appeared Oct. 19th on Fox News Channel's Megyn Kelly, naturally denied helping Hillary during the primaries and attacked Kelly for even asking the question. 

Brazile's indignation is laughable.

"As a Christian woman, I understand persecution, but I will not sit here and be persecuted," she huffed. "Your information is totally false," she lied.

Donna Brazile is a disgrace to her party, journalism and Christianity.

CNN announced in a statement Monday after the email became public that Brazile had tendered her resignation and CNN accepted it on October 14th a few days after the  Brazile tip-off first broke.


Tweet

Donna Brazile pulled "a Hillary"

Donna Brazile, formerly of CNN (Clinton News Network) and now the Democratic Party leader, claimed to the world that emails showing her apparently giving Hillary Clinton questions at a March town hall were "doctored." 

In order to check out the veracity of her claim, tech forensic experts went to work, and they are now saying that they've found proof the emails were authentic, which proves Brazile did "a Hillary" with the truth.

On a TV interview with Fox News, Megyn Kelly questioned Brazile about an email that surfaced from Campaign Chairman John Podesta's email account and attributed to Brazile which was posted on WikiLeaks, an internet website headed by Julian Assange (who Hillary Clinton wanted to "drone"). 

The email was passed on to campaign adviser Jennifer Palmieri about the death penalty, under the subject line: "From time to time I get questions in advance."

Soon after the email was sent, the March town hall was hosted by CNN and TV One. A similar question was asked by Roland Martin, but Brazile vehemently denied receiving questions from CNN. "I have seen so many doctored emails. I have seen things that come from me at 2 in the morning that I don't even send," she said. "I will not sit here and be persecuted, because your information is totally false."

But of course it was not false--Donna Brazile's indignation was false.

Tech blog Errata Security quickly found the email in question could be verified by using an ordinary verification program.

DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) is a system verification system used by many email servers, among them is HillaryClinton.com. It is used to avoid spam filters whereby the system sends a DKIM "key" to the receiver to verify the sender and confirm the email hasn't been tampered with.

Bloggers ran the DKIM keys that were included with this and other emails through the verification software and it validated the Palmieri email as both real and undoctored.

Cybersecurity expert Robert Graham presented his results and showed that if the emails had been in any way altered, the software would have declared the emails unverified. The whole procedure took about five minutes, he told Fox News.

So it's obvious Brazile lied.

When asked if it was possible that WikiLeaks could have been hacked too, Graham said that it was very unlikely because to do so, the hacker would have needed access to the HillaryClinton.com server.

Graham is so confident in his finding that he posted a $600 BitCoin challenge for anyone who can alter an email and still have it come up as verified after being run through DKIM software.

So far, no takers.

It seems that Donald Trump has a good case to make about the election and media being rigged. This is not the America I grew up in--this America is becoming like a Third World nation and it saddens me.




Tweet

Who Lost the Great Debate--guess

The final debate is over, the candidates had their say, and, in the end, Donald Trump would not commit to the results of the election if he loses. 

He will believe the results, of course, if he wins. That's because he needs an 'out' to protect his fragile ego should Hillary Clinton win, and it's looking more and more like the former secretary of state, as incompetent and untrustworthy as she is, will likely win the election.

And if Hillary Clinton does, in fact win, that would be historical--she would be the first non-convicted felon to hold the office of president.

Had the GOP put up any other candidate than Trump, there is no doubt that Clinton would be singing the blues. Not only is she the former Worst Lady, she is also the worst candidate money can buy. But the presidency has become like a monarchy, and it's Hillary's turn, and her devil-given right, to run the country.

Trump seemed to win the debate up until the end, until he blew it, just like the New York Mets.

Chris Wallace began with policy issues over gun rights and went on to discuss abortion and immigration. All was going relatively well for Trump, whose use of polysyllabic verbiage is generally limited to such words as 'incredible,' 'unbelievable' and 'amazing'. Donald called Hillary a "nasty woman" and she responded by saying Donald was the "most dangerous" person to run for president in modern history. 

Nice and civilized.


When asked if he would accept the election results, Trump's response was: "I will look at it at the time." He cited his concerns about voter registration fraud and hit the media saying they are corrupt. Of Hillary Clinton, he said that she "shouldn't be allowed to run" because she committed a "very serious crime" with her emails.

And again when pressed about whether he will concede if he loses the election, Trump said, "I will tell you at the time. I'll keep you in suspense," this being the same secret tactic he will use against ISIS if he should somehow happen to win.

Clinton responded to that remark with "That's horrifying," and to be perfectly honest, I can see her point. It's one thing to think that corruption exists, because it absolutely does exist. But the idea that the entire election is "rigged" suggests that our system in total is corrupt and nothing about the American system can be trusted. That's just nonsense and Donald needs to visit places like Russia and North Korea for a more balanced outlook.

Hillary went on to add, "That is not the way our democracy works. He is denigrating, he's talking down our democracy and I for one am appalled."

What does not apparently appall Hillary is accepting millions of dollars from foreign countries that denigrate the very gender for whom she pretends to advocate.

Trump responded by saying the Justice Department's handling of her email probe was "disgraceful," but he forgot to mention the FBI Director's even more disgraceful handling of her email probe.

Chris Wallace was the best part of the debate along with the respectful audience. His questions were tough on both candidates and he was able to pretty much keep the debate in control, in spite of the back and forth verbal battling that took place from time-to-time.

The candidates never shook hands at the start nor the end of the debate--boxers have more class than either of these two clowns.

America lost the debate.


Tweet

The Queen of Jordan on Islam in the U.S.

Queen Rania appeared on Fox's "Sunday Morning Futures" with Marie Barteromo and was asked about her perception of Muslims in the U.S. You can see the video here.

Since Queen Rania is the Queen of Jordan, I'm not clear as to how accurate of an opinion she can give about U.S. Muslims, but nevertheless, she spoke at length on Islam and how we should not believe our lying eyes regarding the religion of peace.

The first thing Ms. Barteromo posed was: "Give us your reaction to what has taken place with regards to ISIS and ISIS terrorizing the West and the world."

Queen Rania responded: "The two things I would like people to understand is that first of all, Islam in now way condones the actions of these extremists. Those barbaric savage acts that we've been seeing on TV; the public beheadings, the rape, the slavery, the mass murders. There's nothing in Islam that condones these kinds of actions."

Wrong.

The Koran, Islam's holiest book, a book "perfect" and eternal is chock full o' nasty stuff. "Kill them wherever you find them and drive them out from where they drove you out. Persecution is worse than slaughter" (2:191).

"When you meet the unbelievers, strike their necks" (4:34).

"Oh you who believe, fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you and let them find harshness in you" (9:123). Only to be certified by: "Mohammad is the apostle of Allah. Those who follow him are merciful to one another but harsh to disbelievers" (48:29).

Ant that's just the tip of the ISIS-berg in the Koran. If you also read the Hadith, the collection of obsessive-compulsive traditions, and the Sunnah, actual sayings and terrorist history of Islam's Mohammad, you will get a better understanding of just how wrong Queen Rania is about Islam.

The Queen of Jordan goes on to say that "I know that there are people who say that there are verses in the Koran that refer to violence; but I would say there are such verses in the Bible as well, and if you take something out of context and you manipulate it to serve your agenda . . . there is no holy script that condones these actions."

I would ask the queen to kindly point out anywhere in the Koran that condemns violence against non-believers, especially if they refuse to pay a tax or convert to Islam. In fact, anything in the Koran that talks about tolerance, such as "there is no compulsion in religion," has been abrogated in the Koran. That is, it has been overridden with better suras--which makes no sense to me if the Koran is supposed to be perfect. 

There should be no need to change or abrogate anything that is perfect.

Queen Rania mentioned the fact that Muslims have killed more Muslims than non-Muslims. She's correct in terms of modern times. But that's because Muslims see those other Muslims they're killing as either apostates or blasphemers. For example, the Sunnis and Shi'ites see each other as blasphemers because of the way they practice the religion of peace. That's precisely why they hate each other.

She also mentioned Islamophobia, a term that is highly offensive to anyone with a brain. 

A person accused of Islamophobia implies that he or she is a racist, which implies Islam is a race. It is a tool to shut up conflicting opinions, where truth has no part of the process. Islamophobia implies the fear of Islam is irrational, which is crazy.



Tweet

Catch and Release and Catch

Release and catch, a new way to fish for terrorists. First we catch them and put them away in Gitmo, then we release them, because it's just the nice thing to do. Now we have to catch them again because the "rehabilitation" program in Saudi Arabia works as well as prison rehabilitation programs work for sex offenders in the US. That is, they don't work well at all.

Now there's a $5 million reward for information leading to the capture of Ibrahim al-Rubaysh (his friends call him "Abe"). It seems that Abe was released back in 2006 during the George Bush administration and the guy has gone and joined Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. If you know anything about this organization, you know it's terrorism 2.0 and the most dangerous affiliates of all the Al Qaeda folks.

FEC's Ann Ravel is Trying to Gag Us

Democrats would love to control all of the media, including my blog. They love freedom of speech, just as long as they agree with what's being said. You see it on Fox News all the time: Jessie Watters asks whether Rush Limbaugh should be thrown off the air for his views and invariably leftists believe that he should.

A key Democrat and Vice Chair on the Federal Elections Commission (FEC), Ann M. Ravel (pronounced "Alinsky") called for new rules on Internet-based campaigns that would regulate political sites and news media like the Blaze and the Drudge Report. Currently, these sites are exempt from most FEC rules, but Ann would like more power over us to keep us in line. "A reexamination of the commission's approach to the internet and other emerging technologies is long overdue," she complained.

Ann's power play attempt comes after a 3-3 deadlock vote on an anti-Obama campaign in Ohio featuring 2 YouTube videos that violated FEC rules when it didn't report its financing or offer a disclosure on the ads. 

But the ads were placed for free and not considered paid advertising. According to a 2006 FEC rule, free political videos and advocacy sites are not under FEC regulation because the FEC wanted to boost voter participation in the political arena. Only paid advertising are supposed to be regulated just like on TV.

If Little Awful Annie had her way, she would regulate all right-leaning groups that post anti-Democratic ads even if they're free. (Google IRS + scandals).

Fortunately, the FEC Chairman, Lee E. Goodman, is a good man and a Republican. He said that under the conditions Ravel argues for, then anyone with a political blog, uses a chat room or runs a politically active news site could be regulated, that is, censored, handcuffed, or gagged, however you want to depict it.


It's like the old saying goes: "When conservatives speak, liberals want to shut them up. When liberals speak, conservatives want them to keep talking."

People like Ann Ravel are dangerous to our First Amendment rights, which means they're dangerous to all of our rights. Look at any dictatorship and you will see a society that does not allow anyone to speak, write or in any way go against it.


Tweet

The Audacity of Dope: Hunter Biden and the Navy

Hunter Biden will not be hunting submarines anytime soon. The Vice President's son has been discharged from the Navy after testing positive for cocaine and says that he's "embarrassed" over it. Thank goodness he wasn't ashamed--that would look bad on his resume.

"Isn't that your dealer, son?"

Hunter is a lawyer by training and was an ensign by mistake; his mistake. He joined his unit last year and according to the Wall Street Journal, was discharged this past February.

He told Fox News that he respects the Navy's decision but did not go into detail about why he was given the boot. Who can blame him? After all, if you got caught with white powder up your nose, would you go into detail to all of America?

"It was the honor of my life to serve in the U.S. Navy and I deeply regret and am embarrassed that my actions led to my administrative discharge," he said on the down low. "I respect the Navy's decision. With the love and support of my family, I'm moving forward." Biden is 44 years dumb.

He was to serve as a public affairs officer (possibly because Joe told him that he'd get to meet lots of hot, married women), but after reporting to his unit in Norfolk, Va., he tested positive for cocaine.

When Hunter joined the Navy late in life, Joe-the-Village-Idiot-Biden said in an effort to disrespect the military, "We have a lot of bad judgment in my family. My son over 40 just joined the Navy to be sworn in." Just another brilliant statement from President Obama's life insurance policy.

This all just goes to prove, the dope doesn't fall far from the dad.

Tweet

PC is Okay in OK, but not for me

Well no surprises here--authorities, as I predicted, called the jihadist beheading, Islamic slogan-shouting, with previous attempts by the killer to convert co-workers to Islam, "workplace violence." Terrorism experts, and anyone who has read even a few chapters in the Koran are upset with this PC balderdash. It's jihad, baby, and there is no doubt about it.

One of the first reports by local OK media said that Alton Nolen sliced at Colleen Hufford's neck so hard it practically decapitated her. But the true story is that this scum receptacle stabbed her several times and then beheaded the 54 year old Vaughan Foods worker.

The FBI is reviewing Nolen's Facebook page which contains anti-American rants under Islamic name, "Jah'Keem Israel." The page also has photos of Osama bin Laden and a photo of the 911 terror attacks.

Nolen also has a paraphrased quote from the Koran (8:12) "I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their fingertips off them." Workplace violence?

Colin Clark, a terrorism expert told Fox News (Fox and Friends, Saturday) that the beheading was an act of terrorism and should be characterized as such. 

What was Colin's first clue--the attempt at conversion first, followed by killing when his co-workers refused? It's all in their "Bad Book" and should be read by all of us who want to understand the enemy. Sure, it isn't all Muslims who want the "unbelievers" dead, but it's seriously suicidal to believe that the terrorist mindset and actors are a tiny minority of the Muslim population. 

And those Islamists who do not want to kill us still want the world to follow sharia law. But sharia law says that those of us who refuse to convert must pay a heavy tax to Muslims---the jizya. If we refuse to pay, then it's their religious duty to kill us. Even if we go along with their Seventh Century nonsense, women are treated like crap, Jews are treated worse than crap, and the rest of us must feel 'subdued' by our Muslim benefactors.

Let's face it; we have a president who is more than simply sympathetic to Islam--he downright bows to it (see Abdullah, King, Saudi Arabia, Obama, Barack Hussein, tongue-to-sandals). Islam is here but it's going to look different in the future if we continue to be PC.

If you don't believe me, just ask the French and the Londoners.

Tweet

Call Them What You Want--They're Here

No news is not necessarily good news--sometimes it's just the media's way of saying, "We don't want to talk about it."

Back in June of this year, Brendan Tevlin, 19 years old, was stopped at a red light at the corners of Ridgeway and Northfield Avenues in West Orange, New Jersey. A car pulled up next to him and the man in the car began shooting at Brendan. He was struck 8 times and later pronounced dead.

It was initially reported to be a random shooting, even though the shooter, Mohammad Ali Brown, a Muslim, said that he shot the victim for revenge of the United States' actions in the Middle East. 

Maybe the media would have given in slightly and called it "random road rage." Brown called it a "just kill." But even that was too much for the media. The story got sucked into a black hole.

But there's more to the story: Mohammad Ali Brown killed 3 others in Seattle. He said: "My mission is vengeance . . . Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan . . . all these lives are taken every single day by America, by the government . . . so a life for a life."

Militant Terrorists: even Fox News got it wrong

Even Fox News refers to the Islamic State as a "militant" group. In an online article on Tuesday entitled: "Iraq militants changing tactics, complicating US airstrike mission," Fox explains how the IS terrorists are blending in among the population, "making targets more difficult."

Lt. General William Mayville Jr., director for operations with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said "The targeting in this is going to become more difficult." 

See, IS is using Hamas tactics, using civilians to help their cause, which under normal rules of war would be a crime.

While the airstrikes give these terrorists second thoughts about getting their supply of virgins and cause them to behave like cowards by hiding behind civilians, it also shows that in order for our air power to be effective, US ground forces would have to be deployed, and Obama has his political reasons to forbid that move.

So the killing of innocent civilians will continue unless the Yazidis can hold out until after the midterm elections are over, when Obama can be "more flexible" with his political decisions.

Defense sources told Fox News that tension between the White House, the Pentagon and the State Department is high because the military is being asked to fix a problem that could have been fixed best when it began and would have clearly saved lives. Now the military is limited in what they can do to fix the problems and Obama is on vacation.

John Rug 'n Plugs Kerry was clear that we will not be sending troops back into Iraq no matter how many innocent people were killed. 

Kerry was asked about the 7 year old Australian boy in Syria who was mugging for the cameras with the severed head of a Syrian soldier in his little hand. He was taken to Syria by his religious father who, rather than teaching his son how to feed the gas while driving the family car, took him to fight alongside him for the sake of jihad. "One of the most disturbing, stomach-turning, grotesque photographs ever displayed," Kerry said.

I guess he missed the photo of one of the five guys Obama freed for Sgt. Bergdahl. This terrorist had the heads of 5 guys he personally beheaded.

These are not militants. These are not animals because animals don't behead their own kind. These are Muslims who are simply emulating their prophet, Mohammed.

I have to say, I'm disappointed with Fox News.

Tweet

Tip-toe Through the Tunnels

August 1, 2014. Zev Chafets, a Fox News contributor, recently published a piece for entitled: So far, Israel has won nothing but the contempt of unmolested Hamas high command The title is longer than the web link but some people like to bloviate and Zev Chafets is no exception.

Chafets quotes Muhammed Deif, the military commander-in-chief, "We love death for Allah the way that you love life." This Muhammed is about as original as gum, but he is allegedly a man of his word, according to Chafets, and he has a solution that he believes will satisfy both Israel and Hamas: "kill Muhammed Deif, his entire command structure and as many of his gunmen as possible." Chafets seems to think this is an easy task.

But Chafets believes that Israel is too focused on blowing up the terror tunnels which he says Hamas has built over the years to "defend itself from airstrikes and as an avenue of attack against Israel." He cites the fact that Hamas used a commando team to emerge from a tunnel, kill 2 IDF soldiers and capture Lt. Hadar Goldin as a way of saying that going after the tunnels is time wasted. He goes as far as to say that Israel's military is "more like a paper army, deploying ground forces on tippy toe, failing to find or engage the enemy and unwilling to risk casualties by fighting aggressively."

Comparing the Left Media with the Right Media and Anti-Semitism

I read several online news media today about the fighting going on in Israel and the Gaza Strip. Let's compare headlines:

The first headline read: "Israel restarts Gaza bombardment" versus the second: "Israel resumes airstrikes on Gaza after Hamas rejects cease-fire proposal."

The innocence of Muslims

This headline comes from BBC World and the second from Fox News Network. The BBC headline makes it seem that Israel is being the aggressor while the Fox headline gives the reason for Israel's retaliation and shows us more clearly what is going on there. Israel was willing to negotiate, Hamas kept firing rockets and pretended not to be informed of the deal Egypt was laying out for peace.
The BBC comes from England, a country where Islam is showing its intolerant face more and more with "no go zones" and murders in the name of Islam.  Not long ago a British soldier was killed and beheaded in the streets of London. The murderer spoke on a video explaining exactly why he killed the soldier, and the reason he gave was that he killed the young father for the sake of  jihad; Islam's "holy" war with the infidel world. 

Just Another Video Catalyst

Fox News reports of an Iraqi Shi'ite cleric, Nassir al-Saedi who warned the US military advisers heading for their beautiful and bountiful country that "We will be ready for you if you are back." This peaceful man of the cloth referred to the US as "occupiers" and he plans to engage us militarily if we set foot on his lush, verdant nation.

On Thursday, "President" Barack Hussein Obama of the United States of America, TelePrompted that he is prepared to send 300 special troops into the sweet-smelling and fertile war-torn land, but this religious cleric, a man of Allah, gave the warning during "religious" Friday services (when such prayers about hating Jews, Christians, and everyone else that isn't a Shi'ite Muslim abound).

Coincidences and Coverups

Ahmed Abu Khatalla is captured after 2 years since his involvement with the Benghazi 911 attack that killed our ambassador and 3 Americans. Hillary Clinton gets interviewed by Fox News Network practically at the same time we learn of this. Coincidence?

The IRS loses 2 years of emails that would have clarified the involvement of Lois Lerner and perhaps Barack Obama in the scandal that targeted conservative groups, keeping them from obtaining their tax exempt status. Then 6 more IRS officials had "the dog eat their emails."  Another coincidence?

Obama trades 5 Taliban terrorists for a lowly Army deserter. This happens at the same time when he is planning to close the Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility. Now there's talk of him releasing scores more of these dangerous thugs. Yet another coincidence?

We had the Fast and Furious scandal, Benghazi, Bergdahl, Solyndra, the IRS, AP, NSA, James Rosen, and the New Black Panthers voting suppression scandal, lest we forget. One administration, so many "phony scandals." 

We have to ask ourselves the question: what are the chances we will ever get the hard evidence, the communications, emails and the like, about these scandals? Probably about as much chance as catching Jay Carney being totally truthful about Obama.

According to the Associated Press, the Obama administration last year cited "national security" 8,496 times to withhold information requested under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This is a 57% increase from the previous year. In fact, 36% of FOIA requests made in 2013 were either censored or denied, and in 196,034 other occasions, the "dog ate the homework" excuse was used--that is, they simply could not find the records requested.

So "the most transparent administration ever" is exactly the opposite of that claim. It should give you pause to wonder what other lies have they told, and what are they not telling us.






Tweet