ABC Whistleblower: Harris was given the questions and was promised Trump would be fact-checked; she would not

"So tell us why Trump is such a piece of s**t?"

According to a report by The Geller Report an ABC whistleblower is allegedly planning to release an affidavit attesting that Kamala Harris was given “the same questions that were given during the debate” and was assured that Trump would be “fact-checked” and she would not.

Again, this is alleged and has not been proven to have occurred, but if ABC is anything like CNN, it isn't a crazy conspiracy theory. Who do they think they are--Donna Brazile? Candy Crowley?

Mark Penn, a former advisor for the Clintons, is calling on an independent investigation into ABC News for rigging a debate. Below are a few of the posts that address the allegation.

If this turns out to be true, this is a serious breach of journalistic ethics and a death blow to @ABCNetwork reputation. https://t.co/lRZA9CZTpx

There are actually 5 whistleblowers now. Even former Clinton adviser Mark Penn is calling for ABC to probe if there was some effort at "rigging the outcome of this debate." Additionally, a very short video is circulating of Linsey Davis who is a sorority sister of Kamala Harris,… pic.twitter.com/4WyBG4Vykm

— Tony Seruga (@TonySeruga) September 12, 2024

🚨BREAKING: It is now confirmed that Kamala Harris cheated and rigged the debate.

– Kamala was given the questions before the debate.

– Kamala was told that she would not be fact checked no matter what she said and that Trump would be fact checked. pic.twitter.com/evP3v7XRrz

— Philip Anderson (@VoteHarrisOut) September 12, 2024

The real losers were ABC and its two partisan moderators, Muir and Davis. They sought to warp a debate, disgraced their network, and offered a good reminder why such media “moderators” should never be allowed anywhere near presidential debates. https://t.co/2nHe16lcL0

— Victor Davis Hanson (@VDHanson) September 12, 2024

The ABC “fact-checks” were fake, which has inversely drawn MORE attention to these topics, aka the Streisand Effect, which is a social phenomenon that happens when there's an attempt to censor or hide information but inadvertently brings more attention to it.

Besties

In 2003, Streisand tried to suppress photographs of her Malibu home from being published by suing the photographer. However, the lawsuit had the opposite effect, leading to widespread public interest and the viral spread of the photographs that might otherwise have gone unnoticed.

Essentially, the Streisand effect shows how efforts to suppress information can backfire, resulting in the undesired information becoming even more public and widely disseminated.

If it is proved that ABC fed Harris the questions with the pledge to not question her but would instead challenge Trump's claims, heads should roll, indictments should fly and people should be fired.

Tweet

Comical News Network snubbed from debate moderation

CNN Moderator to Trump: President Trump, how have you coped with your abject failures as President? How ashamed are you?
CNN Moderator to Joe Biden: Mr. Vice President, it's an honor, sir. My question to you is, what is the one thing you would like to see happen in your presidency that you haven't already accomplished as Vice President?

This is how a Comical News Network (CNN) moderator would sound if that network was allowed to put in a Biden shill. Thankfully, that will not happen because the network is being snubbed for the debate(s) and this is for obvious reasons.

The whiners at CNN are now whining publicly that Chris Wallace [who is not shill for Trump, that's for certain] a Fox News host, is moderating the September 29th debate.

Speaking on CNN's "Newsroom," socialist host Brianna Keiller, seemed to be clueless as to how Chris Wallace, a person who appears left-leaning. would get the chance to moderate while working for a network that doesn't believe Trump should be thrown out of office in disgrace, incarcerated for being a wise ass, and made to give up all his wealth to Black Lives Matter and Antifa. She believes that Fox News, not the Compromised News Network [aka Comical News Network; aka Communist News Network] who "tells it like it feels."

“The presidential debates are set and Fox News’ Chris Wallace will monitor the first between President Trump and Joe Biden,” said Keillar, as reported by Newsbusters. “The debate commission giving the September 29th face-off to Fox despite propaganda, dishonesty, and the fact that some Fox hosts advise President Trump,” unlike Jake Tapper who only advises Republicans not to run against Democrats is state elections, or Donna Brazile who gave Hillary Clinton debate questions and who [unfortunately] works for Fox News.

Keillar, known for having the self-awareness of a crouton, then asked CNN senior reporter Oliver Darcy if perhaps the presence of Chris Wallace, who she admitted is a fair journalist, will somehow legitimize Fox News.

Let's be real. Fox News leans to the right but their actual reporters like Brett Baier, Bill Hemmer and several others, are quite fair. CNN, on the other hand, is extremely bias and far-right leaning. They leave out details and create hoaxes like the "good people on both sides" hoax in which they made it sound as if Trump was praising white supremacists and Antifa, when his next sentence clearly explained who he meant. CNN left it out, like they also forgot to report that President Trump has been nominated twice for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Propaganda? Ha!


C'mon, man. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear.

Tweet

Mini Mike lies about gun background checks during Fox News town hall

"Go and get me my pudding, you billionaire"

Billionaire Democratic presidential candidate [Mini] Mike Bloomberg knows as much about guns as blowfish know about algebra.

On Monday at a Fox News town hall, the former New York mayor, known best for his ban on large gulp sodas and stance on the Second Amendment, said that background checks are not required to be done on gun show sales or over the internet. He falsely claimed that background checks on sales at gun stores require these checks, but not in the other two cases.

"You cannot buy a gun in a gun store where they won't do a background check. And all they do is look for those three categories—if you're a minor, if you have psychiatric problems, or if you have a criminal record," Bloomberg said, personally qualifying in the second aforementioned criteria. "The law does not apply to guns sold over the internet or in gun shows."

Federally licensed gun dealers are required by federal law to conduct background checks on gun sales, regardless of where they take place. Under federal law, non-licensed individuals are not required to conduct background checks on intrastate gun sales between one another.

There is no special exception in federal law for sales made at gun stores or over the internet. Some states require background checks on non-licensed sales as well, and gun-control advocates want a federal law requiring the same, so Bloomberg is talking out of his nether regions and continues to screw up the basic facts on the gun debate, proving that in this great country of ours, even a moron can become a billionaire.

Bloomberg consistently screws up the way the background check system works and also tends to make up a "loophole" in the federal gun laws. His crazy claims about youth firearm ownership and his ongoing misstatements show that his "life's work" needs a workover.

He even went on during the town hall to throw the bull and say that federal law doesn't apply to internet and gun show sales because the internet and gun shows did not exist when the federal background check law was passed in 1993.

Maybe it's time for Bloomberg to step down from the apple crate and bow out. But hey, I'm not a Democrat and, according to Donna Brazile [aka Hillary Clinton's question provider], I better keep my mouth shut and mind my business. After all, it isn't as if Democrats ever say anything about GOP campaigns. Right?

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Stephanopoulos caught cutting his throat on camera when Jay Sekulow spoke to press

Evidently afraid the public was about to hear the other side of the story, the American Bullcrap Corporation's [ABC] George Stephanopoulos was caught on camera doing a "throat slash" or cut, gesture as President Trump attorney Jay Sekulow took questions from actual journalists on Thursday during the Senate impeachment trial coverage.

Stephanopoulos was a staffer for former President Bill "I Did Not Have Sex With That Woman" Clinton. We can surmise that Stephanopoulos was signaling to his producers to stop allowing his one viewer [named Jim] to hear Sekulow's thoughts about the trial.

The cut gesture was made after explaining that Trump’s legal team will call witnesses who don’t think alleged actions are impeachable. It was then that the camera cut back to Stephanopoulos, who was making the throat-slash gesture.

The embedded Democrat Stephanopoulos then smirked, appearing to realize his gesture was caught on live television. He is the epitome of fake news along with Jim "Dear Diary" Acosta, Chrissy Matthews, Rachel Maddow, Chrissy Hayes and avowed Communist Lawrence O'Donnell.

“And that is Jay Sekulow right there,” Stephanopoulos told viewers before zipping his fly and quickly moving along to a leftist panel discussion.

Just before ABC cut off the press feed, Sekulow was telling actual journalists that the President's legal team plans to prove two different views on impeachment and both would result in Trump remaining in office.

Stephanopoulos' hate Trump lizard brain kicked in and he made the cut sign.

“We’ve got lawyers that are going to be put forward when our side of the case goes, that represents multiple schools of thought on what is and what is not an impeachable offense,” Sekulow said. “But they have one thing in common, that the actions alleged and the actions of the president do not reach that level. No matter what school of thought you’re on… our position is, you still have to meet basic, fundamental constitutional obligations and they haven’t.”

Before becoming an embedded Democrat in ABC, Stephanopoulos was a Bill Clinton staffer who due to his grossly overt sycophantic behavior got him a senior aide position, possibly "with benefits."

But Stephanopoulus' ties to the Clintons eventually became a source of embarrassment to the American Bullcrap Corporation when he was again caught in an illuminating position. That is, he was caught secretly giving money to the Clinton Foundation and had to recuse himself from hosting any presidential debates

It isn't as if he's the only one with ties to the Democrats or someone who is nefarious. Let's not forget Donna Brazile who gave Hillary Clinton the debate questions in the Democratic nomination campaign of 2016 when she went up against Bernie Sanders, or how the head of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Schultz had to resign as the DNC chair after it was learned that there was an agreement in which Hillary would control the party's finances, strategy and all the money raised. Her campaign also had the right of refusal of who'd be the party communication director and all the decision-making on all the staff.

No, Stephanopoulos, like the above-mentioned Democrats, got caught. Donna Brazile got a gig on Fox News for some odd reason. Wasserman-Schultz is still in office. And George Stephanopoulos still works for ABC.

The left controls the media and buys digital ink by the barrel. Those of us on the right need to be very smart and call them out whenever we see injustice or lies.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings.




Tweet

Trump slams Fox News and 'Smiley' Bret Baier, who responds

Seriously? Does President Trump want to go after the only TV network and news organization that has been his best ally? Is he that thin skinned?

President Trump took to Twitter to attack "Special Report" host Bret Baier along with the network on Tuesday after Monday night's town hall event with socialist lunatic Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and currently the person who's leading the pack in the contentious 2020 presidential campaign.


Trump expressed his ire with the "smiley" Baier’s alleged "soft questioning" of Sanders and Fox’s overall recent bent, citing the hiring of disgraced CNN contributor and Democratic operative Donna Brazile.

Trump tweeted:

"So weird to watch Crazy Bernie on [Fox News]. Not surprisingly, [Bret Baier] and the 'audience' was so smiley and nice. Very strange, and now we have [Donna Brazile]?"

Baier shot back on Twitter mere hours later:

"Thanks for watching Mr. President – we’d love to have you on a town hall soon — or even an interview on ["Special Report"] — it’s been awhile. We cover all sides."

Baier, alongside "The Story" host Martha MacCallum, moderated the town hall event for Sen. Sanders. The event's audience constituted a diverse crowd, but comprised mostly fans of Sanders, it appeared. They hooted and hollered at everything he said without even using the letter "R.

I'm a Trump supporter but I hope he stops attacking people inside the tent.


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Bernie Sanders will jog slowly in 2020 if he's the best chance to beat Trump

Bernie Sanders, 77, says that he will likely run again in 2020 and is betting he'll still be alive and in fairly decent health as he will be almost 80 if he takes the oath of "awfuss."

The Brooklyn-born Vermont communist who calls himself an independent said he would go after another presidential bid if he thought he would be the best guy to defeat President Trump.

"If there's somebody else who appears who can, for whatever reason, do a better job than me [like anyone who understands economics and why the free market works better than socialism] I'll work my as* off to elect him or her," he said as he scratched the very same area he had just mentioned. "If it turns out that I am the best candidate [LOL] to beat Donald Trump, then I will probably run."

If he runs, he better consult his doctor first.

Sanders ran against the Hillary Clinton machine in the 2016 presidential primary, but with the assistance of Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Donna Brazile, lost in the nomination to her.

Rumor has it that Hillary is thinking about trying for a third time to become THE FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAAA!!! and we can only hope that she and Sanders get to square off at each other again--it would be a howl.

Maybe this time Sanders won't wimp out.

Pres. Sanders and VP Clinton

But Sanders' aides are reportedly watching Sen. Elizabeth "Very White" Warren (D-Mass) who is widely seen as a possible contender because the more you lie as a liberal, the better chance you have in an election. Do the math.

Sanders traveled to South Carolina, an early voting state where he spoke at a "Medicare for All" rally, organized by the S.C. arm of Our Revolution, a leftist offshoot of his 2016 White House bid.

He also views Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as brilliant, but he's getting old and his judgment is impaired.

But the kids love him and he may one day turn America into Venezuela if elected.

Hello fellow conservatives. Please click the "Follow" button in the margin to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.




Tweet

Donna Brazile found proof DNC rigged nomination for Hillary

Holy bat droppings Batman! The DNC fix was in just like we thought.

The 2016 presidential primary between Hillary Clinton and Bernie "Sandinista" Sanders was rigged by the Democratic National Committee. Sanders' communist supporters suspected this and they were correct--the DNC handed the nomination to Clinton, according to former CNN commentator, former interim party boss and Clinton confidante Donna Brazile.

She made the claim Thursday while trumpeting her new book that is likely to put her on the outs with Team Clinton forever.

"I had promised Bernie when I took the helm of the Democratic National Committee after the convention that I would get to the bottom of whether Hillary Clinton's team had rigged the nomination process, as a cache of emails stolen by Russian hackers and posted online had suggested," Brazile wrote for Politico Magazine. 

"By September 5, the day I called Bernie, I had found my proof and it broke my heart," she said.

The proof was a joint fundraising agreement document between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund and Hillary for America. It was signed in August 2015, four months before she declared her candidacy, and a year before she officially secured the nomination over the socialist Sanders.

"The agreement--signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias--specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party's finances, strategy, and all the money raised," Brazile wrote. "Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff."

The frenetic supporters of Democratic socialist and Russian-loving Sanders have constantly accused the Democratic establishment of taking steps to help Hillary win the primary. And if Bernie wasn't such a whimp and went after Clinton over her emails, he might have pulled off a victory in spite of all the help Crooked Hillary received from her leftist worshippers.

DNC spokesman Xochitl Hinojosa, whose name can only be pronounced correctly by close family members, works under current DNC chairman, Tom "Potty Mouth" Perez. He told Fox News the party's official policy is to not take sides during the primaries, but he lied or has his head stuck up in his nether regions.

"The DNC must remain neutral in the presidential primary process, and there shouldn't even be a perception that the DNC is interfering in that process," Hinojosa said as he bit the inside of his mouth to keep from laughing.

Brazile said that joint fundraising committees were assembled between the DNC and the Clinton and Sanders campaigns during the 2016 cycle but only Hillary raised money for the party.

The piece, titled "Inside Hillary Clinton's secret takeover of the DNC," is an excerpt from Brazile's new book to be published this month.

Once Brazile became interim party boss she said she searched for "evidence of internal corruption that would show that the DNC was rigging the system to throw the primary to Hillary."

"I had been wondering why it was that I couldn't write a press release without passing it by Brooklyn," she wrote, referring to Clinton's headquarters in Brooklyn, New York, near Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues, (not far from a cool shopping mall with a Target store, and the Long Island Railroad). "Well, here was the answer."

Brazile said it isn't unusual for candidates to make such arrangements with party organizations after the election, but the way Crooked Hillary did it was unethical, but not illegal. Only the private unauthorized email server with top secret information on it was illegal but she's still walking the streets a free woman.

"If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead. This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party's integrity."

What integrity?


Tweet

They're melting, they're melting

It's so, so very sad. So so. Shocked and extremely appalled snowflakes are incredibly upset over the prospect of having Donald Trump as their president. Some Hillary supporters, including her cheating husband, Bill, have turned to attacking the election outcome and are trying to delegitimize the election like Hillary did with her husband's victims.

Even Donna Brazile, who tried to influence the election by providing Hillary with the primary debate questions is upset over how the Russians "tainted" the election outcome. If anyone can speak to tainting, it's Ms. Brazile.

What a total bummer to think that Hillary Clinton, the Hillary Clinton, would lose to Donald Trump. 

How could such a crude, rude and inept dude con man be elected president? It's an unthinkable nightmare. How unfair.

The Russian and Comey reasoning didn't work, so it must be the system. Yes, the Electoral College is the problem . . . that must be it. Those freaking Founding Fathers. What do fathers know anyway? Hillary had more popular votes, so she's more popular and should be the next president. The first woman president, as she currently identifies her gender that way.

So big deal--Trump had more electoral votes--306 to Hillary's 232. Why is that allowed?

Because it keeps large populated states from over-representing the election outcome. California, for example, single-handedly turns Trump's plurality in the popular vote into a Clinton plurality.

The "fly-over" states have fewer people, but they need to have their say in the election, and with the electoral vote, they do.

Under our electoral-vote system we elected a national president, not California's choice for the office. Clinton voters need to understand that this election was legitimate just as Hillary Clinton urged Donald Trump to do after the third debate.

The Electoral College worked as it was supposed to work and Trump has now gotten all the votes he needed (270) and then some. The outcome was what America wanted and what America did not want--and that Donald Trump as president and Hillary Clinton as the "Second Place Runner Up."


Tweet

Brazile demands bipartisan investigation into Russian attacks of election

Democratic National Committee head and debate-question-to-Clinton provider, Donna Brazile, wants to tell Congress what to do regarding the investigation into the Russian meddling of the presidential election. 

Brazile, you may recall, worked for CNN but was fired when it was alleged that she gave Hillary Clinton's team no less than one debate question in the primaries, possibly more. She is, however, not calling for Congress to investigate how those questions may have factored in regarding the primary outcome, and spoiling any chance Bernie Sanders may have had against Clinton.

"As Chair of the Democratic National Committee, one of the main victims of the Russian attacks, I ask that you support and provide any needed assistance to an independent, bipartisan investigation of the attacks that includes public hearings," the interim chairwoman of the DNC wrote in a letter to Congress Sunday.

"What we do know is that these intrusions were not just 'hacks'--they were attacks on the United States by a foreign power, and they must be treated as such," she said.

She's totally correct--we need to do everything we can to find out more and learn how to stop these attacks. But we also have to ask: what the hell has the Obama administration been doing for the past eight years?

And we also need to ask: who is Donna Brazile to be lecturing us on impropriety?

Anyway, she wants answers to questions about Russia's intent and how the US is preparing to prevent future attacks.

Unlike the Benghazi investigation regarding Hillary Clinton's blatant incompetence, Brazile wants this investigation to be independent. She also wants it to be bipartisan and thorough, but that should go without saying.

"In defeat and when mistakes have been made, our country has a proud, honored and timeless tradition of coming together and rising above partisan politics to determine the truth, learn from the experience, and become stronger as a nation," she pontificated. "We hope that Congress will undertake this important work as quickly as possible," she concluded in the plural.

Yes, Congress needs to come together and find out just what happened. I suspect if they probe deeply enough into the bowels of this so-called election 'hacking' they will see how it should have been prevented by the current administration. 




Tweet

The system is indeed rigged

Voter fraud historically has not been a big issue in the United States, but what I call 'campaign fraud' is now an issue.

An additional WikiLeaks revelation show that Hillary Clinton's campaign got even more help in advance of CNN's primary town hall debates and was tipped off to the network's polling.

The emails that were hacked from Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta and sent to WikiLeaks originally showed then-CNN contributor Donna Brazile sending two debate questions to top Clinton aides. Brazile later became the DNC Interim Chairwoman.

Brazile denied the allegations of cheating on behalf of Hillary Clinton, but another email released yesterday (Monday) showed that she had forwarded at least two additional questions to Clinton's team to give her a leg up on her opponent, and to show herself what "Stronger Together" really means.

Trump's response was a bit of a non sequitur: "She got a lot of questions at the debate," he began. "I mean, if you were at West Point and you got questions like that, they would throw you out of the school if you didn't report yourself. She didn't report it . . . She took the questions. She got the answers.

"I mean she would've been thrown out of West Point or the Air Force Academy--and here we have her running for president," Trump said.

Another WikiLeaks email depicted Brazile detailing a question that would be posed by an audience member "with a rash" before a March 6th CNN debate in Michael Moore's town of Flint, Michigan.

Brazile's role as CNN contributor was suspended when she took over Debbie Wasserman Schultz's position as interim DNC head in July. However, on October 14, after the first emails were made public, CNN accepted her full resignation and the DNC didn't do anything but congratulate her.

Of course, Brazile lied to Fox News' Megyn Kelly and denied all wrongdoing with all the indignation she could muster. She said in an Oct. 11 statement: "As it pertains to the CNN Debates, I never had access to questions and would never have shared them with the candidates if I did."

And Bill Clinton never had sex with "that woman."

 The Clinton News Network even received some DNC "brainstorming" questions for upcoming interviews of Republican presidential candidates.

"Wolf Blitzer is interviewing Trump on Tues ahead of his foreign policy address on Wed. Please send me thoughts by 10:30 AM tomorrow," Lauren Dillon, DNC research director wrote in late April.

It was apparent that CNN had direct contact with Dillon, but not with the RNC.

The same tactic was used in a Ted Cruz interview by CNN in which some of the questions were provided by the DNC. 

Dillon also wrote: "CNN is looking for questions. Please send some topical/interesting ones. Maybe a couple on Fiorina."

Trump is right when he says the system is rigged. We all knew that, but it's almost incredible just how rigged it is.


Tweet

When Democrats are fickle

Oh how fickle when they're in a pickle, those Democrats. 

Now the leftist party is ratcheting up their criticism of FBI Director James Comey for telling the public about his decision to revisit Clinton's email probe. 

But back in July, when Comey went public with the announcement that he didn't have sufficient evidence to merit an indictment of the woman who make all other politicians look like Mother Theresa, he was the darling of the left. If Obama has a love-child with a white woman, he would have looked like James Comey.

During a press conference at his final NATO summit Obama praised Comey for being "exhaustive" during the investigation of the emails. "I think Director Comey could not have been more exhaustive," he said.

Even before the July Comey pronouncement, Obama praised him, calling him a 'rarity' and said Comey didn't care about politics--he was just interested in getting the job done. Of course, Obama has his own problems now that the emails that came out showed that he communicated under an alias with Hillary on her private server. He obviously knew about the server because it wasn't a dot-gov address.

Then there's The Washington Post an uber-liberal rag. The day after Comey announced the fact that he wanted to let Hillary slide on an indictment, they wrote how all the nasty Republicans attacked poor Comey for just "doing his job."

But when the news broke out that Comey was revisiting the case, the same editorial board said that Comey "went too far" by giving Congress a "heads-up" aboutt he investigation, and that the FBI Director 'ruined democracy' for the country by casting a shadow over Queen Hillary.

Then there's the anti-Mother Theresa, Donna Brazile. She originally tweeted praised Comey for doing great work by burying the Clinton investigation, then tried to delete the tweet after Comey changed his mind.

Brazile's emails came under scrutiny when she allegedly gave the Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, debate questions in advance (which the campaign gladly accepted without question). 

Nancy Pelosi (whose tribal name is "Hands That Speak With Forked Fingers") called Comey a "great man" and said the FBI was lucky to have him. Now, according to Pelosi, he is a weak, spineless coward who let Republicans bully him into flipping on Hillary.

"The public interest would be served by the FBI providing the facts, rather than allowing Republicans to stoke innuendo and falsehoods 11 days away from a presidential election," the leftist hypocrite said.

And the alleged father of Pelosi's homely lovechild, Harry Reid (kidding about the kid) said that nobody can question Comey's "integrity" and "competence" unless he flips, and then Reid can. In an open letter, the man with a woman's voice accused Comey of violating the Hatch Act for not investigating Donald Trump's connections to Vladimir Putin of the real 'Borscht Belt.'

But my personal favorite flipper is Congressman Elijah Cummings. I am about to list his quote with the caveat for anyone whose stomach is currently full, not to read it until you have fully digested your meal as this might cause you to vomit in your mouth.

"I don't know whether your family's watching this, but I hope that they are as proud of you as I am, because you are the epitome of what a public servant is all about . . . Sacrificing over and over and over again, trying to do the right thing, sometimes coming under ridicule, but again, still doing the right thing."

Following Comey's revisit, Cummings accused him of being a puppet for the Republicans. "It doesn't surprise me, in a way, that he did this, because I don't think the American people have a clue as to how hard the Republicans, particularly on my committee, have been on the FBI," he said.

The list goes on, but you can imagine the contrast of their own opinions when the outcome didn't go the way they wanted it to go.

Now Obama's chief adviser, and the real power behind the throne, Valeria Jarrett, is among the leftists who want Comey gone and the country to be run by a felon and female misogynist. 

A source told The New York Post that "Valerie argued that Comey was interfering deliberately in the election process and had to be stopped." But the same source claims that Obama is "worried about the consequences of taking such an action--the tsunami of outrage that would come his way, and possibly become a major footnote, or worse, in the history of the presidency."

The GOP however, is ecstatic over Comey's reversal of direction. House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mike McCaul (R-TX) called Comey a "hero" and said of Jarrett, "I don't think Valerie Jarrett has any credibility here."



Tweet

Hillary cheated, Brazile gets booted

CNN said that it is "completely uncomfortable" with emails just leaked showing that interim head of the Democratic National Committee, Donna Brazile, helped Hillary Clinton cheat on the primary debate. 

The Clinton News Network has accepted Ms. Brazile's resignation as a contributer, but it's obvious that they still feel "completely comfortable" with the fact that Hillary Clinton accepted the "heads-up" from Brazile and used the opportunity to provide the debate moderator with an "intelligent" and lengthy response.

"CNN never gave Brazile access to any questions, prep material, attendee list, background information or meetings in advance of a town hall or debate," claimed CNN spokesliberal Lauren Pratapas in an email she sent to the New York Post.

"We are completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign while she was a CNN contributer."

Brazile's contract was merely suspended in July when former DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz had her emails outed by WikiLeaks which showed bias toward Clinton over Bernie Sanders. She was ousted after the discovery was made and replaced by Brazile.

It is unclear if Hillary Clinton or anyone in her campaign was aware of the Debbie Wasserman Schultz bias (probably) and nobody in the campaign declined to accept the help.

What is clear is that wherever Clintons go, scandal follows. 

The mere fact that Clinton's acceptance of Brazile's and Wasserman Schultz's help was not discussed and never questioned by CNN.

In a way, isn't that election tampering? 



Tweet

Brazile bagged for second email with debate question

If you believe the emails released by WikiLeaks are genuine, whether or not the Russians hacked them, you might be surprised to learn that another leaked email shows that Donna Brazile gave the Hillary Clinton campaign a second debate question in advance.

The WikiLeaks document release Monday shows that Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled: "One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash," the night prior to the March 6th CNN (Clinton News Network) primary debate in Flint, Michigan.  

"Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint," Brazile's email stated.

The following night the question proved to be accurate. Lee-Anne Walters, a mother of twin boys who stopped growing and her daughter lost her hair during the Flint water contamination crisis. She posed the question to both Clinton and Sanders: "After my family, the city of Flint and the children in D.C. were poisoned by lead, will you make a personal promise to me right now that, as president, in your first 100 days in office, you will make it a requirement that all public water systems must remove all lead service lines throughout the entire United States, and notification made to the citizens that have said service lines?" Walters asked.

Clinton's answer to the question was so detailed and lengthy that Anderson Cooper had to interrupt her twice to attempt keeping her to the agreed-upon time limit. The crowd cheered but she still lost the state's primary to the socialist Sanders.

The alleged tip-off was found in the load of messages hacked from Clinton's Campaign Manager Chairman John Podesta's Gmail account. 

In the same month, Brazile was accused of tipping off the Clinton machine with a question she sent to Clinton campaign adviser Jennifer Palmieri. The subject line of that email read: "From time to time I get the questions in advance." She then sent the question which dealt with the death penalty.

After Palmieri responded back, Brazile wrote "I'll send a few more."

CNN's Roland Martin asked the death penalty question verbatim the following night during a CNN town hall.

Brazile, who appeared Oct. 19th on Fox News Channel's Megyn Kelly, naturally denied helping Hillary during the primaries and attacked Kelly for even asking the question. 

Brazile's indignation is laughable.

"As a Christian woman, I understand persecution, but I will not sit here and be persecuted," she huffed. "Your information is totally false," she lied.

Donna Brazile is a disgrace to her party, journalism and Christianity.

CNN announced in a statement Monday after the email became public that Brazile had tendered her resignation and CNN accepted it on October 14th a few days after the  Brazile tip-off first broke.


Tweet

Donna Brazile pulled "a Hillary"

Donna Brazile, formerly of CNN (Clinton News Network) and now the Democratic Party leader, claimed to the world that emails showing her apparently giving Hillary Clinton questions at a March town hall were "doctored." 

In order to check out the veracity of her claim, tech forensic experts went to work, and they are now saying that they've found proof the emails were authentic, which proves Brazile did "a Hillary" with the truth.

On a TV interview with Fox News, Megyn Kelly questioned Brazile about an email that surfaced from Campaign Chairman John Podesta's email account and attributed to Brazile which was posted on WikiLeaks, an internet website headed by Julian Assange (who Hillary Clinton wanted to "drone"). 

The email was passed on to campaign adviser Jennifer Palmieri about the death penalty, under the subject line: "From time to time I get questions in advance."

Soon after the email was sent, the March town hall was hosted by CNN and TV One. A similar question was asked by Roland Martin, but Brazile vehemently denied receiving questions from CNN. "I have seen so many doctored emails. I have seen things that come from me at 2 in the morning that I don't even send," she said. "I will not sit here and be persecuted, because your information is totally false."

But of course it was not false--Donna Brazile's indignation was false.

Tech blog Errata Security quickly found the email in question could be verified by using an ordinary verification program.

DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) is a system verification system used by many email servers, among them is HillaryClinton.com. It is used to avoid spam filters whereby the system sends a DKIM "key" to the receiver to verify the sender and confirm the email hasn't been tampered with.

Bloggers ran the DKIM keys that were included with this and other emails through the verification software and it validated the Palmieri email as both real and undoctored.

Cybersecurity expert Robert Graham presented his results and showed that if the emails had been in any way altered, the software would have declared the emails unverified. The whole procedure took about five minutes, he told Fox News.

So it's obvious Brazile lied.

When asked if it was possible that WikiLeaks could have been hacked too, Graham said that it was very unlikely because to do so, the hacker would have needed access to the HillaryClinton.com server.

Graham is so confident in his finding that he posted a $600 BitCoin challenge for anyone who can alter an email and still have it come up as verified after being run through DKIM software.

So far, no takers.

It seems that Donald Trump has a good case to make about the election and media being rigged. This is not the America I grew up in--this America is becoming like a Third World nation and it saddens me.




Tweet

2 Clintonites out after video sting exposes violence incitement, fraud

Scott Foval, the national field director of Americans United for Change, got his walking papers on Monday as did Robert Creamer, head of Democracy Partners; although Creamer claimed that he was "stepping back" from trying to get Hillary Clinton elected as the first felon and female president. 

Undercover video showed discussions of "busing" in voters and inciting violence at Republican rallies.

"I am unwilling to become a distraction to the important task of electing [Hillary] Clinton, and defeating Donald Trump in the upcoming election," Creamer wrote in a statement. 

The Democratic National Committee denied any knowledge of the schemes discussed in the video, and if you believe the DNC, you might be interested in this bridge I have for sale in Brooklyn. 

Snuffies like Creamer and Foval don't commit such egregious acts without the blessings of the campaign.

"The practices described in the video by this temporary sub-contractor do not in any way comport with out long standing policies on organizing events, and those statements and sentiments do not represent the values that the Committee holds dear," DNC interim Chairwoman Donna (CNN) Brazile said of Foval.

The two "Rigging the Election" videos were produced by James O'Keefe, a controversial activist. The videos were 32 minutes total in time and were released in two, edited portions on Monday and Tuesday. 

An undercover filmmaker posed as a campaign donor and is seen trying to engage Foval and Creamer in talking about voter fraud and other schemes. Creamer doesn't go for it, but Foval sings like a bird.

"It's a very easy thing for Republicans to say, 'Well, they're busing people in' . . .We've been busing people in to deal with you f***ing a**h***s for 50 years and we're not going to stop now, we're just going to find a different way to do it," Foval brags. He implies that using personal vehicles for each voter arouses less suspicion than busing large numbers of people from out of state at one time.

Foval also talks about planting people at Republican rallies for Trump. The people chosen are there to incite violence and are trained and given scripts to stick to, said Foval.

"I mean honestly, it is not hard to get some of these a**h***s to pop off," he said. "It's a matter of showing up, to want to get into the rally, in a Planned Parenthood tee-shirt. Or, Trump is a Nazi, you know? You can message to draw them out, and draw them to punch you."

Foval was not referring to himself getting punched, but mentally ill people work well in that area.

Foval worked as a sub-contractor for Creamer's group, which was contracted with the DNC since June of this year. But a DNC source, sounding a lot like Sergeant Schultz on "Hogan's Heroes" said that Foval was not a DNC employee. 

["Vee see nuthink. Vee know nuthink. He ees no vurker uf hours. Go from here."]

That bridge is still for sale.

Zac Petkanas, a Clinton campaign spokesman said, "While Project Veritas has been known to offer misleading video out of context, some of the language and tactics referenced in the video are troubling [especially now that it's public] even as a theory or proposal never executed."

Make an offer and the bridge is yours.

Creamer is shown in the video being asked about getting around voter registration laws for Hispanics, but later said in a statement that none of the schemes described in the conversation on video ever took place. ["We just like to talk about stuff without actually doing stuff."]

O'Keefe has been criticized for heavily editing and manipulating his videos in the past. In 2010, while attempting to gain access to Sen. Mary Landrieu's office in Louisiana, he was caught and arrested. He was charged with a misdemeanor and sentenced to 3 years probation.

"The discredited source of these videos, James O'Keefe, is a convicted criminal with a history of doctoring video to advance his ideological agenda," Brazile said. "We are in the process of conducting an internal investigation to determine whether he and his cohorts committed any illegal activities in this well-funded operation."

Well, Ms. Brazile, if a burglar breaks into a home and sees someone about to be murdered and reports it and stops the murder, the burglar is still a burglar and the murderer is still a murderer. But at least the murderer was caught, just like Foval and Creamer.

We aren't buying your bridge.


Tweet