ABC Whistleblower: Harris was given the questions and was promised Trump would be fact-checked; she would not

"So tell us why Trump is such a piece of s**t?"

According to a report by The Geller Report an ABC whistleblower is allegedly planning to release an affidavit attesting that Kamala Harris was given “the same questions that were given during the debate” and was assured that Trump would be “fact-checked” and she would not.

Again, this is alleged and has not been proven to have occurred, but if ABC is anything like CNN, it isn't a crazy conspiracy theory. Who do they think they are--Donna Brazile? Candy Crowley?

Mark Penn, a former advisor for the Clintons, is calling on an independent investigation into ABC News for rigging a debate. Below are a few of the posts that address the allegation.

If this turns out to be true, this is a serious breach of journalistic ethics and a death blow to @ABCNetwork reputation. https://t.co/lRZA9CZTpx

There are actually 5 whistleblowers now. Even former Clinton adviser Mark Penn is calling for ABC to probe if there was some effort at "rigging the outcome of this debate." Additionally, a very short video is circulating of Linsey Davis who is a sorority sister of Kamala Harris,… pic.twitter.com/4WyBG4Vykm

— Tony Seruga (@TonySeruga) September 12, 2024

🚨BREAKING: It is now confirmed that Kamala Harris cheated and rigged the debate.

– Kamala was given the questions before the debate.

– Kamala was told that she would not be fact checked no matter what she said and that Trump would be fact checked. pic.twitter.com/evP3v7XRrz

— Philip Anderson (@VoteHarrisOut) September 12, 2024

The real losers were ABC and its two partisan moderators, Muir and Davis. They sought to warp a debate, disgraced their network, and offered a good reminder why such media “moderators” should never be allowed anywhere near presidential debates. https://t.co/2nHe16lcL0

— Victor Davis Hanson (@VDHanson) September 12, 2024

The ABC “fact-checks” were fake, which has inversely drawn MORE attention to these topics, aka the Streisand Effect, which is a social phenomenon that happens when there's an attempt to censor or hide information but inadvertently brings more attention to it.

Besties

In 2003, Streisand tried to suppress photographs of her Malibu home from being published by suing the photographer. However, the lawsuit had the opposite effect, leading to widespread public interest and the viral spread of the photographs that might otherwise have gone unnoticed.

Essentially, the Streisand effect shows how efforts to suppress information can backfire, resulting in the undesired information becoming even more public and widely disseminated.

If it is proved that ABC fed Harris the questions with the pledge to not question her but would instead challenge Trump's claims, heads should roll, indictments should fly and people should be fired.

Tweet

Google fires 28 employees after growing a pair

It's beginning to look a lot like companies across America are getting fed up with the "kids" calling the shots or simply acting out, as if they own the company. An example of how the adults took charge was with Google's response to the way Hamasshole supporters are disrupting everything they can.

Although Google has historically supported such woke ideology like DEI and BLM, it finally grew a set of balls, primarily because it had to for its own sake.

It might have been the final straw when a clique of terror-loving Googlers staged a mega-tantrum in the company’s New York and California offices over work their employer does for you know, the Jews of Israel. Google wasted no time to respond and terminate 28 Hamas-supporting racists involved in the disruptions.

“They took over office spaces, defaced our property, and physically impeded the work of other Googlers. Their behavior was unacceptable, extremely disruptive, and made co-workers feel threatened,” the company’s vice president of global security said.

Good for Google.

The “protest” consisted of infantile actions such as office sit-ins and childish demands on a top exec’s whiteboard. 

Overall, their behavior was akin to the Hamassholes blocking the Golden Gate Bridge last Monday, blocking access to vehicles and fortunately nobody was being transported by ambulance for emergency medical intervention. The useful idiots, many of whom would not survive a full minute if they were doing this in Gaza, were allegedly funded by Iran. [H/T The Geller Report.]

The Daily Wire also reported on Google's internal anti-Semitism including the words "kill all Jews" written on a bathroom wall inside one of their offices. A Jewish employee was also assaulted by pro-Hamas protesters on one of their campuses.

In Manhattan, the Hamas-supporters occupied the tenth floor of Google's offices in Chelsea as part of support for the Seattle office for what they called "No Tech for Genocide Day of Action." These were obviously computer geeks and not English majors or minors as they don't understand the definition of the word 'genocide.'

The protesters demanded [LOL] that Google pull out of a 41.2 billion "Project Nimbus" contract with Israel in which Google Cloud and Amazon Web Services provide AI and cloud-computing services for the Israeli government and the IDF.

If it were up to these infants at Google, Israel would be defenseless and they would have their genocide, except to the people it was tried on once before by a turd named Hitler.

Am Yisrael Chai.

Tweet