Donna Brazile found proof DNC rigged nomination for Hillary

Holy bat droppings Batman! The DNC fix was in just like we thought.

The 2016 presidential primary between Hillary Clinton and Bernie "Sandinista" Sanders was rigged by the Democratic National Committee. Sanders' communist supporters suspected this and they were correct--the DNC handed the nomination to Clinton, according to former CNN commentator, former interim party boss and Clinton confidante Donna Brazile.

She made the claim Thursday while trumpeting her new book that is likely to put her on the outs with Team Clinton forever.

"I had promised Bernie when I took the helm of the Democratic National Committee after the convention that I would get to the bottom of whether Hillary Clinton's team had rigged the nomination process, as a cache of emails stolen by Russian hackers and posted online had suggested," Brazile wrote for Politico Magazine. 

"By September 5, the day I called Bernie, I had found my proof and it broke my heart," she said.

The proof was a joint fundraising agreement document between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund and Hillary for America. It was signed in August 2015, four months before she declared her candidacy, and a year before she officially secured the nomination over the socialist Sanders.

"The agreement--signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias--specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party's finances, strategy, and all the money raised," Brazile wrote. "Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff."

The frenetic supporters of Democratic socialist and Russian-loving Sanders have constantly accused the Democratic establishment of taking steps to help Hillary win the primary. And if Bernie wasn't such a whimp and went after Clinton over her emails, he might have pulled off a victory in spite of all the help Crooked Hillary received from her leftist worshippers.

DNC spokesman Xochitl Hinojosa, whose name can only be pronounced correctly by close family members, works under current DNC chairman, Tom "Potty Mouth" Perez. He told Fox News the party's official policy is to not take sides during the primaries, but he lied or has his head stuck up in his nether regions.

"The DNC must remain neutral in the presidential primary process, and there shouldn't even be a perception that the DNC is interfering in that process," Hinojosa said as he bit the inside of his mouth to keep from laughing.

Brazile said that joint fundraising committees were assembled between the DNC and the Clinton and Sanders campaigns during the 2016 cycle but only Hillary raised money for the party.

The piece, titled "Inside Hillary Clinton's secret takeover of the DNC," is an excerpt from Brazile's new book to be published this month.

Once Brazile became interim party boss she said she searched for "evidence of internal corruption that would show that the DNC was rigging the system to throw the primary to Hillary."

"I had been wondering why it was that I couldn't write a press release without passing it by Brooklyn," she wrote, referring to Clinton's headquarters in Brooklyn, New York, near Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues, (not far from a cool shopping mall with a Target store, and the Long Island Railroad). "Well, here was the answer."

Brazile said it isn't unusual for candidates to make such arrangements with party organizations after the election, but the way Crooked Hillary did it was unethical, but not illegal. Only the private unauthorized email server with top secret information on it was illegal but she's still walking the streets a free woman.

"If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead. This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party's integrity."

What integrity?


Tweet

It wasn't racism, it was Hillary's arrogance and stupidity

Democrats simply cannot make a case to vote for them based on policy so they their only alternative is identity politics. 

The top members of the Trump and Clinton campaigns got into heated exchanges at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government forum. 

Naturally, the Democrats accused the GOP of cultivating white supremacists. 

Jennifer Palmieri, the Catholic lady who was disrespectful to Christians who actually believe in their religion, told Trump's team, "The platform that they gave to white supremacists, to white nationalists, is a very, very important moment in our history."

Kellyanne Conway, the Trump campaign manager was furious. She responded to the accusation: "Do you think I ran a campaign where white supremacists had a platform?"

"You did, Kellyanne. You did," Palmieri emotionally said.

Conway spoke on Fox & Friends and called the Clinton staffers "sore losers." She went on to say, "I do think some people are stuck in the permanent campaign and not really past the anger, grief and denial stages and into the acceptance stages. But that's okay, because we won."

During the forum, someone noted that the Southern Poverty Law Center collected reports of almost 1,000 hate-related incidents from almost every state since the election. Conway countered by saying that Trump called for an end to such incidents and called the SPLC a far-left center and "anti-Trump group."

It's noteworthy that even the FBI no longer recognizes the SPLC as a legitimate hate crime resource, but leftists love to cite them. A more recent article discusses the SPLC and their bogus "monitoring" here.

Robby Mook, (aka "The Quicker Mucker-Upper") blamed FBI Director James Comey for Clinton's defeat after bringing up the inconvenient issue of her illegal email server. If it wasn't for Comey, Hillary would have won.

 It's as if Clinton was the victim of the FBI investigation, rather than the perp. If she obeyed the law, there would have been no FBI investigation. And if Mook is so prescient, why didn't he tell Hillary not to call Trump supporters a "basket of deplorables?" That might have gotten her more votes.

Instead, he called the email investigation during the campaign one of the "most over-reported, overhyped, over-litigated stories in the history of American politics." But never mentioned how stupid, irresponsible, lazy, arrogant and incompetent Hillary had to be to use an illegal private server as secretary of state.

A yooge key to Trump's victory was Clinton herself, Conway explained. "I said to Mr. Trump, 'You're running against one of the most joyless presidential candidates in history. Why don't we find a way to be the happy warrior?'"


Clinton also presumed that people who previously voted Democratic would do so again, Kellyanne said. That was an example of her short-sightedness. But Mook said Clinton's campaign never took the win as a foregone conclusion, obviously not recalling that Hillary's campaign, according to the  New York Post, prepared to throw a yooge party after the election to celebrate a victory that never was to be. 

Tweet

WikiLeaks emails show Clinton's allies unaware over 'insane' private server

It's good to know that some of Hillary Clinton's top advisers weren't aware that she was using a private [illegal] server as secretary of state. It gives one hope that if she becomes POTUS (heaven forfend) that one or two of her top aides may actually be concerned over national security, not that it will change the open borders that Clinton wants.

Some of her top advisers had no clue as to the depth and scope of her email system when the scandal broke in March 2015. Even her current campaign manager had no idea about the bathroom server according to the Thursday WikiLeaks release of emails.

A close ally ('You go girlfriend') of Hillary's, Neera Tanden, the head of the Center for American Progress, was still p'd off months after the scandal broke. She pressed John Podesta over who gave Hillary permission to use the private system.

"Do we actually know who told Hillary she could use a private email? And has that person been drawn and quartered?" Tanden wrote in July. "Like whole thing is f***ing insane."

But some of Clinton's closest aides, especially those who worked with her at the State Department (like Cheryl Mills and Huma Weiner Abedin) were very likely aware and on board with the illegal email setup, while others were in the dark.

On March 2nd, Podesta wrote to campaign manager Robby Mook asking if he had "any idea of the depth of this story?"

March 3rd, 1:32 a. m. Mook wrote back: "Nope. We brought up the existence of emails in research this summer but were told that everything was taken care of."

March 2nd, John Podesta also wrote to Tanden about his worries the day the email scandal broke. "Speaking of transparency, our friends [attorney David] Kendall, Cheryl and Phillipe [Reines] sure weren't forthcoming on the facts here."

Tanden's reply implied that keeping the [illegal] email setup a secret was probably Cheryl Mills' doing: "This is a Cheryl special," she wrote. "Know you love her, but this stuff is like her Achilles heel. Or kryptonite. She just can't say no to this s**t. Why didn't they get this stuff out like 18 months ago? So crazy. I guess I know the answer they wanted to get away with it."

Six months afterward, Tanden was still angry, and in a September 4th interview said Clinton still owed the American people an apology.

Actually, the American people are owed more than an apology. We are owed an FBI director who upholds the law and is apolitical. We are owed an Attorney General who wears the blindfold of fairness and justice. 

We are owed true transparency, not just words.

And we are owed a prison sentence for Hillary Clinton who clearly broke the law simply by having a private server and a real investigation into the Clinton Foundation with questionable practices.

Tweet

A Clinton campaign truth detector

You know how you can tell if the Clinton campaign is taking the presidential election for granted? 

When they deny that they're taking the election for granted.

The campaign is moving toward trying for a blowout victory over Donald Trump while simultaneously trying to take control of the Senate.

"We're not taking anything for granted," campaign manager Robby Mook said on "Fox News Sunday," meaning that the campaign has finally concluded that they can take the race for granted and now move to take the Senate and the Supreme Court once Clinton rules the nation.

When she spoke in Pittsburgh, Clinton stumped for Katie McGinty, the leftist challenger for a Pennsylvania Senate seat, and she tried to connect McGinty's incumbent opponent, Sen. Pat Toomey, to Trump.

Trump has bigger hands.

"If he doesn't have the courage to stand up to Donald Trump, are you sure he'll be able to stand up for you?" the former Worst Lady asked her zombie followers.

If Clinton wins and if the Senate goes to the left, the Supreme Court too will follow. The checks and balances our founding fathers designed for the country will be as useless as a Gender Studies degree.

And they will eventually run out of our money.


Tweet

WikiLeaked: What Huma implied about Clinton's Moroccan trade-off

Hillary Clinton was questioned about charges of "pay to play" at the Clinton Foundation in the first presidential debate and, as is her wont, she was an artful dodger. But within hours after the debate, WikiLeaks produced a new load of emails depicting her at the center of negotiating a $12 million commitment from King Mohammed VI of Morocco.

Ironically, it wasn't Putin or Trump or a guy named Harmon Glunk who made the charge; it was Hillary's most loyal aide, Huma Abedin. 

Huma described the connection in an email exchange from January of last year with John Podesta and Robby Mook.

Abedin, the soon-to-be ex-wife of Carlos Danger (aka Anthony Weiner) wrote that "this was HRC's idea" in regard to her speaking at a meeting of the Clinton Foundation (aka Clinton Global Initiative) in Morocco in May of 2015. The purpose of Hillary's going there to "speak" was to finagle a $12 million commitment from King Mo.

"She created this mess and she knows it," Huma wrote to Hillary's henchmen, Mook and Podesta. 

The 'mess,' in part was how her three advisers wanted her to have no part in the speaking engagement as she was getting ready to launch her presidency campaign. They believed it would likely raise questions about her role at the foundation and be viewed as a serious conflict of interest should she become "THE FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!" as she puts it so loudly.

The month prior to the speaking engagement, Politico reported that the Clinton Foundation was accepting a "major donation" of no less than $1 million from a Moroccan government-owned company, OCP, a phosphate exporter. The report said that it would be "unlikely" that Hillary would attend the event the following month as she had just began her campaign (to the chagrin of informed voters who have her number, so to speak).

As it turned out, the influence peddling came to $12 million and Hillary almost passed out from the shock (as she is also wont to do). 

She struggled with her decision about whether she should stay or go and this was due to the fact that her role with lining the coffers of her foundation was a lot bigger than the public knew--emphasizing the distinction between what she says publicly versus what she says privately.

As early as January, Robby Mook indicated that Hillary was wrestling over whether to attend the event--her advisers worried about how it would look in terms of her involvement with the foundation and its fundraising.

The email subject line was: "FYI CGI Africa." The CGI being the Clinton Global Initiative. The email was sent to Podesta and Abedin around the same time Carlos Danger was also online sending something else to young women who would have him.

"Came up on our call with HRC," Mook wrote. "John flagged the same issues we discussed, Huma. HRC said she's sitll (sic) considering."

Huma later replied that King Mohammed would be totally pissed off if Hillary pulled out. She wrote: "Just to give you some context, the condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation. If hrc was not part if (sic) it, meeting was a non-starter."

Perhaps King Mo had 'a thing' for Hillary, but he sure wanted her there.

It turns out that the idea for the event to be held in Morocco was Hillary's. "This was HRC's idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request," Abedin wrote. "The King has personally committed approx $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting."

The big question now is what did Morocco and other donors to the Clinton Foundation get for their money? 

Possibly the first female president that money could buy.


Tweet

Clinton aides agree to take the foreign money but get no argument from her

Luckily for Hillary Clinton, she never has a clue when it comes to things that could get her in trouble with the law. She was totally "in the dark" in April 2015 when her top aides decided to accept tons of money by lobbyists who represent the interests of foreign countries. The aides did the dastardly deed without telling Clinton, according to newly leaked emails.

One of Hillary's top advisers simply wrote: "The the money!"

And Hillary never knew jack, because she probably didn't want to know. It's called 'plausible denial'.

The money discussions raised by lobbyists under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) began on April 13, the day following Hillary's announcement that she was seeking the Democratic presidential nomination in hopes of becoming "THE FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!"

Dennis Cheng, Hillary's Finance Director, initially raised the subject of the money. He wasn't sure if the campaign was indiscriminately allowing "those lobbying on behalf of foreign governments to raise" money for the campaign or if the issue would be decided on a case-by-case basis.

General Counsel Marc Elias referred to the decision as "a straight up political call" and an aide, Jesse Ferguson, asked: "How much money we're throwing away" if they turned down foreign lobbyists.

It is illegal for an American campaign to accept money from foreign donors in order to protect the country from their influence. 

But if Hillary Clinton cannot even protect her emails and confidential documents because she illegally used a private server, how can we expect her to protect us from foreign actors after they bought their influence in her presidency?

The following day, aide Karuna Seshasai noted that of the 370 prospective bundlers, 27 had already been flagged as registered with FARA. Among those countries were: Iraq, Egypt, Azerbaijan, Libya and the United Arab Emirates.

Campaign Manager Robby Mook, John Podesta, Huma Abedin and others held a conference call and at first voted not to allow anyone currently registered as a foreign agent to contribute or raise money, but anyone who terminated with FARA would be allowed to contribute.

But Cheng said in an April 15 email that some of "our friends who happen to be registered with FARA are already donating and raising." He then added that the campaign would be "leaving a good amount of money on the table" if the Mook-Abedin-Podesta plan was followed.

Cheng then wrote: "How do we explain to people that we'll take money from a corporate lobbyist but not them; that the [Clinton] Foundation takes $ from foreign govts but we won't"?

Elias then advocated for a case-by-case decision process and on April 16th, Mook wrote that he was convinced: "So . . . in a complete U-turn, I'm ok just taking the money and dealing with any attacks."

Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri wrote the following morning: "Take the money!"

A week afterward, Abedin emailed Mook to say that Clinton learned about the plan to accept foreign lobbying money by reading about it in the newspaper. 

But she went along with it and is just as guilty. This is what is referred to as "pay to play."

The worst thing, however, is that the liberal media hasn't even reported any of this, and there is no greater journalistic sin than that of omission. This is the beginning of the erosion of our nation, unless things change quickly.



Tweet