The Spanish invasion from Morocco continues as death toll climbs to 67

Look at all the women and children [Adri Salido image]

Europe's borders are not mere lines on a map; they are the front line of civilization.

The latest death toll in Spain's border crisis at Ceuta has climbed to 67, according to the Spanish government. Some victims drowned attempting the crossing, while others were killed in the desperate crush of a human stampede at the breakwater barrier. It is a grim reminder that when governments surrender control of their borders, tragedy inevitably follows.

In response to the unprecedented breach, Spain announced it will install a 500 meter containment barrier extending into the sea after an estimated 50,000 to 60,000 migrants overwhelmed the tiny Spanish enclave's frontier between Thursday and Friday. That's like closing the barn door after the horses escaped.

On Saturday morning, a handful of exhausted migrants who swam to Ceuta's Tarajal Beach were met by Spanish soldiers and escorted back across the border. Spain's Interior Ministry said that most of those who entered the North African territory have already been returned to Morocco.

After days of disorder, Ceuta's streets have grown quieter. But calm is not the same as security.

"Life in this city has been disrupted as a result of the border incident," said Ceuta President Juan Jesus Vivas.

"The return of people has begun satisfactorily but the process must be completed," he said. "The city has not yet returned to normal."

That final sentence deserves far more attention than it will receive. A nation can restore traffic, reopen shops, and clear its streets, yet still suffer lasting damage to public confidence. Citizens who watch tens of thousands of people overwhelm a border in a matter of hours cannot easily be persuaded that their government remains fully in control.

Across the border in Tangier, Morocco, migrants who had either returned from Ceuta or failed to reach Europe slept on the floor of the city's main railway station. Many had gone days without food. Others remained determined to try again. 

Boo freaking hoo.

"I tried to cross, but I failed. I stayed near the border with Ceuta for two days, but I couldn't find anything to eat," said Abdalah, an aspiring jihadi, who withheld his surname for fear of retaliation after attempting to enter Spain illegally. 

Meanwhile, along the road to the Moroccan town of Fnideq, streams of migrants continued walking toward the border fence, some barefoot, apparently preparing for another attempt. Taxi drivers and bus operators refused to transport them, fearing retaliation from Moroccan authorities, while police established checkpoints to inspect every vehicle headed toward the frontier.

Yet many Islamic invaders who succeeded in reaching Ceuta made clear they had no intention of leaving voluntarily.

"They've closed everything down so that we can't buy anything to eat, to force us to return to our country," said 23 year old Moroccan illegal alien jihadi Mohamed Hatri.

"But even if they close it down ... we're round to stay here, whether we're hungry or not."

That declaration captures the central dilemma confronting Europe. 

Compassion alone cannot substitute for sovereignty. Every nation has a moral obligation to preserve life, but it also has a fundamental duty to determine who enters its territory and under what conditions. A border that exists only on paper soon ceases to exist at all.

The events in Ceuta should also serve as a warning to every Western democracy. 

Spain's crisis is not uniquely Spanish. It is a glimpse of what any nation can face if it convinces the world that its borders are negotiable rather than enforceable. Once the expectation spreads that illegal entry will ultimately be rewarded, the incentives become overwhelming, the humanitarian costs multiply, and public trust begins to erode. 

Other Western nations would do well to learn this lesson before finding themselves confronting the same crisis on their own shores.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Israel and Morocco to normalize relations as per the Trump administration

President Donald Trump announced on Thursday that Israel and Morocco have agreed to normalize relations and try to live in peace. This is the fourth Arab-Israel agreement in four months, making the average of Arab nations putting their anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist hatred on nation per month. Impressive, and a feat never before seen in the Middle East. Other presidents and John Kerry may have made statements to that effect, but only Trump has come through with the results. 

Well, actually Kerry said it couldn't be done, but he's a moron so you cannot take him seriously.

As Trump's remaining time in office dwindles, he said Israel and Morocco would restore diplomatic and other relations, including the immediate reopening of liaison offices in Rabat and Tel Aviv as well as the eventual opening of embassies. 

U.S. officials said it would also include joint overflight rights for airlines.

Meanwhile, presumptive president-elect Joseph Robinette Biden plans to mandate all Americans wear masks for his first 100 days in office and is in the process of trying to memorize the names of his cabinet picks that were picked out for him to pick. 

China, Iran, and Russia are looking forward to Biden's time in office, even if it's only going to be a short period of time when Kamala Harris takes over. 

And Hunter Biden says that he isn't worried about the tax evasion investigation that began in 2018 but held under wraps by the legacy media to avoid interfering with Biden's chances of winning this election, whose results are quite questionable. "With Dad as president, this too shall pass," he said, quoting an enema commercial.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon, check out the ads. Christmas is coming.

Tweet

ISIS supporters and beheaders of Scandinavian girls in Morocco get death sentence

The Squad

Morocco -- What these scumcrumpets  did was barbaric, inhuman and disgusting. These men, who claimed allegiance to ISIS, brutally murdered two young Scandinavian women who were guilty of hiking in the Atlas Mountains while being white. 

The three man "Squad" [who will not be named here] were accused of killing and beheading Maren Ueland, 28, of Norway, and Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, 24, from Denmark in December. They heartlessly recorded their crime on video which was shared on social media by mentally deficient ISIS supporters.

On Wednesday, a court in Morocco convicted them on terror charges. A fourth suspect, who fled the scene, was given life in prison, so it's probable they caught the guy.

Louisa Vesterager Jespersen
 and Maren Ueland

The Moroccan court also handed 19 accomplices jail terms ranging from five to 30 years, which obviously isn't enough, but hey, it's Morocco.

The 23 men addressed the court ahead of the verdicts, most begged for leniency, not unlike the two sweet Scandinavian women they were involved with the merciless killings. The main defendants asked Allah for forgiveness [mostly for getting caught] but received no answer.

The bodies of the two women – roommate at Norway’s Bo University – were found on December 17 in an isolated area near Mount Toubkal, Morocco’s highest peak, and a popular hiking destination. The two women were on a Christmas camping trip and were studying to become tour guides.

During the trial, it was learned that two of the Islamists beheaded the two women while the other filmed it on his cell phone.

“The most just thing would be to give these beasts the death penalty they deserve,” Helle Petersen, Jaspersen’s mother, said in a letter that was read out in court last week, the BBC reported.

Beasts only slay for food or self-preservation; these Islamists are lower than beasts.

If the executions against the three men go ahead, Allah willing, they will be the first in the northern African nation since 1993.

While the three men have said they are ISIS supporters, the terror group has not said it was behind the killings because it didn't want the bad PR.

In his closing arguments in June, the prosecutor asked the court to sentence the top suspects to death, and described the three main defendants as "human beasts." Why stop there? They are animated excrement.

The lawyer for Vesterager's family said he was "100% satisfied" with the verdicts. Khalid El Fataoui noted that Louisa Vesterager's mother had asked the court in a letter at an earlier hearing this month to sentence the killers to death.

"We obtained what she asked for."

And while this writer has also lost a son in 2014 in a brutal murder, I know that nothing can make up for the loss, but the death sentence at least feels a bit like justice and perhaps will save others in the future.

Good riddance to them.


If you enjoyed this post, consider following my blog, but even if you choose not to do so, please check out the sponsors on this page.





Tweet

ISIS scum admits to beheading female hiker in Morocco: 'I regret getting caught'

An ISIS jihadi supporter who admitted to leading a jihadist cell told the court that he regrets beheading one of two Scandinavian women in Morocco, especially now that he has been caught.

Abdessamad Ejjoud,  a religious 25-year-old Muslim terrorist, made confessed on Thursday in Morocco where he is on trial for the murders of Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, 24, of Denmark, and Maren Ueland, 28, of Norway.

“I beheaded one of them…I regret it,” he told the BBC reported.

"After failing to join the Islamic State, [due to flat feet] we decided to do jihad at home," the 33-year-old crap weasel said, according to Sky News.

Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, 24, and Maren Ueland, 28, were killed in ISIS-inspired attacks while backpacking in Morocco.

The two incredibly naive women, roommates at Norway’s Bo University, were on a Christmas camping trip in Morocco when they were killed Dec. 17, 2018. They were on an unguided trip and camping close to North Africa's highest mountain, Mount Toubkal.

A video of the beheading was shared widely on social media by ISIS supporters showing just how much the scum who committed these atrocities were regretful.

In Denmark, charges have been brought against 14 people who shared the video to get their vicarious rocks off.

Ejjoud and 23 others are on trial in connection with the killings. The killers will, unfortunately, not get the death penalty because Denmark believes in giving them another shot at not getting caught.

"After failing to join the Islamic State, we decided to do jihad at home," said Ejjoud, a total loser, liar and father of two future jihadis from Marrakesh.

Ejjoud admitted that he had beheaded one of the women: "I regret what happened and I am still trying to grasp it," the human garbage said.

He is trying to "grasp" the fact that he cut off the head of an innocent human being who did him or anyone no harm. A young beautiful person who did not deserve to be butchered by this POS.

Maybe the women were just too Islamophobic for him.

Please consider following Brain Flushings and don't be shy about visiting the ads on these pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey 
Thanks.

Tweet

Victims of Islamists, victims of the left

Two young women, Louisa Vesterager Jespersen, 24, from Denmark, and Maren Ueland, 28, from Norway, were murdered by Islamic jihadists in the Atlas Mountains of Morocco. One was beheaded and her murderers sent a video of the horrifying savage cruelty to her mother.

To call these jihadis 'animals' is unfair to animals. 

But the part that's difficult to accept is how young people like these women are led to believe that Islam is a religion of peace and if you don't believe that, then you're just an Islamophobic racist. Did they learn it in school where Islam seems to be held in higher regard than Christianity and certainly more than Judaism?

Quite possibly.

The left has built up a dialogue about Islam and the wicked witch West, whitewashing Islam and scorning conservatives who have a somewhat more realistic view of its problems in western culture.

According to the MailOnline, “Ms. Ueland’s mother, Irene, told Norwegian broadcaster NRK: ‘Her priority was safety. The girls had taken all precautionary measures before embarking on this trip.’”

Evidently not. Whatever these women thought they understood about Morocco's religion and culture didn't cover the reality of the dangers that exist for infidels.

Islam, in its purest form, is a war religion, a religion of conquest, not a religion of peace. To think otherwise is foolish and very dangerous.

The three crap weasels who murdered the women were caught and arrested. They will be sent to prison and provided a Quran and a prayer mat along with three halal meals a day.

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do.

Have a wonderful Christmas!

Tweet

Where have all the ISIS jihadis gone?

The Islamic State has been getting their collective butts kicked by U.S.-backed forces now that the rules of engagement have been relaxed by President Trump to the point where we can actually destroy them. 

But we haven't destroyed them all and of the estimated 40,000 who have traveled from all around the globe to fight for Allah a few hundred still survive and are thought to still be fighting as the terror organization lost most of its territory.

But what about the rest of the scumquats? Where did they go?

Thousands have been killed in the intense fighting, but it's believed that many survived and will continue to be a real threat in the future.

"The issue is: how many have died? How many are still there and willing to fight? How many have gone elsewhere to fight?" Seth Jones, director of the International Security and Defense Policy Center at the Rand Corporation said. "How many have given up? I don't think we have a good answer."

Counterterror groups are trying to answer these questions and are doing all they can to name and track foreign fighters.

In France, about 1,700  jihadists went to Syria and Iraq since 2013 to join IS. Of those, about 400 have been sent to their virgins in the sky and 250 returned to France.

Foreign Affairs Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said that around 500 are still in the Iraq-Syria theater and it's now going to be very difficult for them to return to France. However, that still leaves about 500 whose whereabouts are unknown.

Terrorism expert Bruce Hoffman of Georgetown University believes that "thousands" have escaped the war zone. How he knows this is a mystery, but that's why he's the expert.

"Today, some of them are most likely in the Balkans, lying low for the time being, waiting for the opportunity to infiltrate themselves to the rest of Europe," he said.

No less than 80 IS jihadis from Russia, Morocco, Saudi Arabia and Yemen have joined since May, the IS-allied Abu Sayyaf fart-weasels who now fight government forces in the southern Philippines, kidnapping unsuspecting tourists and beheading them for fun and profit.

In the northern Afghanistan province of Jowzjan, local people in the area told the AFP that French-speaking IS fighters from France or northern African countries have recently arrived there. 

There remains escape routes from the battlefields of Syria and Iraq. IS militants were able to blend in with civilian refugees or bribe their way, or sneak into Turkey.

Many of the IS jihadis never planned on going home and have no choice but to continue the fight for their Sixth Century values against the civilized world where folks take regular showers and don't fool around with children or the livestock.


Tweet

Under the government's radar

The terrorists involved with each of the three Islamic terrorist attacks in Britain were known to authorities but they failed to act to stop them and 34 lives were lost. So it's the same in the U.K. as it is in the U.S.A. in terms of the nine most frightening words as per Ronald Reagan: "I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

British officials admit the Westminster Bridge attacker, Khalid Masood was on police radar. They admitted the Manchester bomber Salman Abedi was on police radar. And they admitted London Bridge terrorist Khuram Butt was on police radar.

All had links to Islamic extremism. But in all three cases, the jihadists were not viewed as sufficient threats to cause concern.

In another case, Italian intelligence operatives told Politico Europe the another member of the London Bridge trash trio, Moroccan-born Youssef Zaghba, was detained while attempting to fly from Italy to Istanbul--probably bound for ISIS-controlled territory in Syria, in March of last year.


Here's the clincher: when he was asked why he was flying to Turkey, Zaghba said, "I'm going to be a terrorist." Seriously.

So Italian officials warned Moroccan and British authorities about the guy, but British police issued a statement on Tuesday that Zaghba "was not a police or MI5 subject of interest."

Butt was publicly open about supporting ISIS to the point the guy appeared in a documentary "The Jihadis Next Door."

Imagine how incredibly stupid the British have to be for them to make a video about jihadists and then let them go untethered to kill innocent people. Either the British need to get their freaking radar system checked, or stop being afraid of being labeled 'Islamophobic' by people who want to shame you into looking the other way.

The documentary showed Butt praying by an ISIS flag with a radical Muslim leader who's a close buddy of the scum muffin Anjem Choudary. 

Why wasn't that enough to take away his citizenship and send him packing to Syria? 

Let him fight for ISIS there if he wants to kill people; and we'll see how well he does against the U.S.-led coalition.

England has over 20,000 suspected jihadis and 3,000 of which are in police radar. 

Good luck on that.



Tweet

Morocco bans the burka

In an effort to reduce crime, Morocco has banned the wearing of the traditional Islamic burka and niqab worn by religious Muslim women, and religious Muslim men who are willing to commit suicide to kill infidels and win their way into Paradise.

The burka also makes a great disguise--you cannot tell who's underneath. It can be a woman or a man with a plan.

So the country has banned the production and sale of the full-face veils for security reasons.


It has been reported that the ban was imposed due to reports felons have been using burkas to help carry out their crimes without being identified.

Burkas also make a lovely addition to both men and women with an affinity of self detonation in the name of Allah.

Most women in Morocco, whose King Mohammed VI (would you have guessed that name if I didn't tell you?) favors the hijab which doesn't cover the face, prefer that to a burka, a cloth coffin designed to discourage randy Muslim men from acting on their id impulses.

Moroccan fragrance scientists were the ones who invented the camel-inspired perfume Beneath the Burka. Sold mainly to Islamic State jihadists and the Taliban, it has become the number one perfume preferred by Islamic extremists, and it's potable.



Tweet

Clinton Foundation chose to hide $1 million "gift" and more

The terrorist-finding nation of Qatar gave the Clinton Foundation a $1,000,000 gift which they accepted and 'forgot' to notify the State Department that it had done so. This is a clear violation of the ethics agreement Hillary Clinton signed when she unfortunately became Secretary of State in 2009.

The terms of the agreement has Clinton promising that the foundation would notify the State Department's ethics official in all cases in which a foreign government wished to donate or if a foreign donor wished to "increase materially" its contributions. 

In other words, Hillary Clinton should have notified the State Department even before the money was received so that the State Department could determine whether the foreign government was buying influence through Clinton and her position in government.

It's becoming increasingly clear that it's going to take a lot more than Hillary merely breaking the law as a knee-jerk reaction to put her away.

The million dollars was pledged in 2011 to mark Bill Clinton's 65th birthday. It certainly beats getting a tie or shirt.

Amitabh Desai, the Clinton Foundation's foreign policy director, sent out an email to colleagues saying the Qataris wanted to meet Bill Clinton "'for five minutes' in NYC to present [the] check." This was during Hillary's time as Secretary of State, a position she held and abused until Feb. 2013.

The foundation spokesman Brian Cookstra said the "gift" didn't constitute a "material increase" in Qatar's contributions.

The State Department said it had no record of the donation from the terrorist-funding nation and said  it was up to the foundation to submit it for review, which evidently, they didn't.

This was not an isolated incident in which a foreign country has given oodles of money to the Clinton Foundation, and it constitutes a serious conflict of interest at worst, or a serious lack in judgment at best.

I would put my money on both.

Donald Trump has often called for Hillary Clinton to return donations from countries that have poor human rights records, but the chances of that are about the same as a goldfish learning algebra.

The Foundation admitted that no complete list of donors to the Clinton Health Access Initiative, a health program of the foundation's, has been published since 2010, despite Clinton lying 2 years prior that a list would be published annually. 

Then we have Morocco.

Right after the first presidential debate in which Hillary skirted a question about charges of "pay to play" at the Clinton Foundation, another trove of WikiLeaks emails came out with charges that Hillary herself was at the heart of the $12 million commitment from Morocco's King Mohammed VI. 

The most remarkable elements of the charge is that the allegation came from Huma Weiner Abedin, Hillary's closest aide said to be like a "daughter" to her. Huma described the connection in a January 2015 email exchange with two top advisers to Hillary, John Podesta and Robby Mook.

Huma wrote that "this was HRC's idea" that she [Hillary] speak at a meeting of the Clinton Foundation in Morocco in May 2015 as an explicit condition for the $12 million commitment from the king.

Abedin wrote: "It will break a lot of china to back out now when we had so many opportunities to do it in the past few months. She created this mess and she knows it."

The "mess" partially involves the fact that the three advisers were talking about Clinton pulling out of the speaking engagement because it was scheduled only a month prior to her official launch of her presidential campaign and would look suspiciously unethical.

Hillary unethical? Who'd a thunk?

Huma wrote back later the same day suggesting that the king would be furious if Hillary pulled out of the event.

What was originally thought to be a $1 million payout by Morocco turned out to be $12 million and that was just too many greenbacks to pass up. This showed just how big a role Clinton played in bringing in the money to the foundation--but a clear conflict of interest.

"Just to give you some context, the condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation," Huma wrote. "If hrc was not part if (sic) it, meeting was a non-starter." She also added that the foundation had not come up with the idea to hold the event in Morocco--that idea was Hillary's:

"This was HRC's idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request. The King has personally committed approx $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting."

One can only wonder what big foreign donors to the Clinton Global Initiative got in return for the 'gifts' they gave to Hillary and her posse. 

And one can only wonder what it will take for justice to be served with the Clintons.




Tweet

WikiLeaked: What Huma implied about Clinton's Moroccan trade-off

Hillary Clinton was questioned about charges of "pay to play" at the Clinton Foundation in the first presidential debate and, as is her wont, she was an artful dodger. But within hours after the debate, WikiLeaks produced a new load of emails depicting her at the center of negotiating a $12 million commitment from King Mohammed VI of Morocco.

Ironically, it wasn't Putin or Trump or a guy named Harmon Glunk who made the charge; it was Hillary's most loyal aide, Huma Abedin. 

Huma described the connection in an email exchange from January of last year with John Podesta and Robby Mook.

Abedin, the soon-to-be ex-wife of Carlos Danger (aka Anthony Weiner) wrote that "this was HRC's idea" in regard to her speaking at a meeting of the Clinton Foundation (aka Clinton Global Initiative) in Morocco in May of 2015. The purpose of Hillary's going there to "speak" was to finagle a $12 million commitment from King Mo.

"She created this mess and she knows it," Huma wrote to Hillary's henchmen, Mook and Podesta. 

The 'mess,' in part was how her three advisers wanted her to have no part in the speaking engagement as she was getting ready to launch her presidency campaign. They believed it would likely raise questions about her role at the foundation and be viewed as a serious conflict of interest should she become "THE FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!" as she puts it so loudly.

The month prior to the speaking engagement, Politico reported that the Clinton Foundation was accepting a "major donation" of no less than $1 million from a Moroccan government-owned company, OCP, a phosphate exporter. The report said that it would be "unlikely" that Hillary would attend the event the following month as she had just began her campaign (to the chagrin of informed voters who have her number, so to speak).

As it turned out, the influence peddling came to $12 million and Hillary almost passed out from the shock (as she is also wont to do). 

She struggled with her decision about whether she should stay or go and this was due to the fact that her role with lining the coffers of her foundation was a lot bigger than the public knew--emphasizing the distinction between what she says publicly versus what she says privately.

As early as January, Robby Mook indicated that Hillary was wrestling over whether to attend the event--her advisers worried about how it would look in terms of her involvement with the foundation and its fundraising.

The email subject line was: "FYI CGI Africa." The CGI being the Clinton Global Initiative. The email was sent to Podesta and Abedin around the same time Carlos Danger was also online sending something else to young women who would have him.

"Came up on our call with HRC," Mook wrote. "John flagged the same issues we discussed, Huma. HRC said she's sitll (sic) considering."

Huma later replied that King Mohammed would be totally pissed off if Hillary pulled out. She wrote: "Just to give you some context, the condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation. If hrc was not part if (sic) it, meeting was a non-starter."

Perhaps King Mo had 'a thing' for Hillary, but he sure wanted her there.

It turns out that the idea for the event to be held in Morocco was Hillary's. "This was HRC's idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request," Abedin wrote. "The King has personally committed approx $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting."

The big question now is what did Morocco and other donors to the Clinton Foundation get for their money? 

Possibly the first female president that money could buy.


Tweet

Arab nations now want UN to make the Western Wall Islam's own

Nothing will easily stop the spread of this disease. People are dying from it all over the world. It sneaks up on you when you're on your way home from work, or from visiting your grand kids and suddenly some stranger tries to kill you with a knife or a meat cleaver. He cuts your arm, you bleed profusely, and just as he's ready to cut your throat, another citizen shoots the stranger dead.

The disease is called orthodox Islam; the place, for now, is Israel.

Some people in the West who want to divorce this ongoing terrorist behavior from the actual religion of Islam and refer to it as radical Islam. It's only radical if you're not a very religious Muslim, otherwise it's perfectly Islamic to kill the infidel.

Rumors were told of how Israel had its sights on the Temple Mount which is considered sacred by both Jews and Muslims. The rumors were false.

Another rumor was told to angry Palestinians of how a 13-year-old boy was executed by the Jews. But in spite of the fact that the boy stabbed another 13-year-old boy to death as he rode his bicycle, and then stabbed another adult and was captured, the kid is now in an Israeli hospital receiving treatment. Another false rumor debunked by visual proof.

But to add insult to injury, as they say, there is a plan by six Arab nations to rid the Jewish State's claim to its holiest site. On Wednesday, the United Nations' so-called cultural arm will vote on this claim that the site should go to the Muslims.

The United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria and Egypt all affirm "that the Buraq Plaza is an integral part of the Al-Aqsa Mosque" and if passed by UN vote would make the Jewish Western Wall an Islamic domain on the Temple Mount.

The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded by this disgusting proposal and said "This is a clear endeavor to distort history, in order to erase the connection between the Jewish People and its holiest site, and to create a false reality."

The recent attacks by Palestinian scumcrumpet terrorists that were, in part, caused by the phony rumor mentioned above, that Israel tried to change the status quo at the Temple Mount. So the response by these Muslim nations is to do exactly what they are accusing Israel of doing! 

Historically, the Western Wall is what remains of a retaining wall that was part of the second Jewish temple. While Jews are not permitted to pray on the Temple Mount, by rabbinic decree, they are allowed to pray at the Western Wall, which is the closest they can venture to their most hallowed site.

But the religion of peace, as some dhimmies call it, does not want Jews anywhere near the site. In fact, the religion of peace doesn't want Jews anywhere.

The vote was originally slated for Tuesday in gay Paris, but UNESCO Director General Irina Bokova, a Bulgarian diplomat, tried to delay it saying she "deplores the recent proposals under discussion by the UNESCO Executive Board that could be seen to alter the status of the Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls, inscribed on UNESCO's World Heritage list, and that could further incite tensions." She also said "The protection of cultural heritage should not be taken hostage."

As if orthodox Muslims need a legitimate reason to be angry or take hostages.

The draft decision, which refers to the Jewish State as "Israel, the Occupying Power," was circulated by the aforementioned Arab states because Palestine isn't a member of the UNESCO Executive Board. The five-page document has only one sentence crafted to push the Western Wall into Islam's purview.

Sneaky scumcrumpets, so it appears.

The rest of the document blames Israel for all the violence past and present and stresses an Islamic claim to everything on the Temple Mount and screw the Jews if they don't agree.

It's bad enough that Muhammad got bad information when he wrote the Koran (with the help of a scribe who wasn't an illiterate like him), and put Alexander the Great over a thousand years in the wrong era of history. But to steal Jewish history and claim it for their own is highway robbery.

Then again, Muhammad actually engaged in highway robbery of caravans in the desert. 

Now his followers want to do the same to the Jews with their holy sites.

Tweet