Liberal media: 'How dare Trump do what Obama did!'

What's good for the goose, is good for the gander, unless the goose is Obama and the gander is Trump, says the liberal media.

The left is angry that President Trump's campaign used data mining to win the 2016 election. The left, both in media and the Democrats, were happy that Obama used data mining to win the 2012 election.

You have to hand it to conservative commentator Ben Shapiro for penning a column for The Hill on Tuesday with the headline: "What's genius for Obama is scandal when it comes to Trump."

Shapiro uncovered a 2012 report from The Guardian saying Obama's reelection team was mining data via Facebook (FB) to target specific voters. The Guardian also happens to be the publication that reported Cambridge Analytics and its ties to Trump's 2016 campaign.

Cambridge Analytica is accused of harvesting data to build profiles on 50 million FB users, who agreed to complete a survey in an attempt to target specific voters with ads and stories.

Shapiro said that FB was fine when Obama's team used similar tactics to what Trump's team used, noting that a former Obama campaign staffer admitted FB didn't attempt to stop Obama's 2012 re-election because the company wanted him to win.

The Obama campaign built a database of every voter using the same FB developer tools that Cambridge (known as API)  used. This allowed Obama's campaign to gain information of voters to calculate "which people would be most likely to influence other people in their network to vote," according to the Washington Post, a left-leaning tabloid.

"Facebook was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn't stop us once they realized that was what we were doing," former Obama campaign staffer Carol Davidsen tweeted on Sunday from her verified account.

Davidsen said that FB revealed that the company allowed the Obama campaign to do things it would not have allowed a Republican candidate to get away with.

Shapiro explained, "Not so with Trump. As soon as Facebook realized that Cambridge Analytica had pursued a similar strategy, they suspended the firm. This isn't surprising. Since Trump's election, Democrats--in search of a rationale for their favored candidate's defeat--have blamed a bevy of social media outlets."

In other words, the Democrats are like children playing in the sandbox making up rules to games as they go along, and always favoring themselves.

FB has agreed to discuss matters with House Judiciary Committee staff as soon as today, Wednesday, after the fallout over Cambridge Analytica's use and exploitation of user data from about 50 million Americans.

Facebook's CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been slammed for being silent on this issue, which needs to be explored for possible election tampering, in this writer's opinion.

Axios reported that Zuckerberg may finally break silence or perhaps wind.

In 2012, Time wrote a glowing article about the data mining used by Obama's team. It was headlined: "Friended: How the Obama Campaign Connected with Young Voters." It explained how social networks are changing the way modern, sophisticated politicians campaign, and even stated that by 2016, "this sort of campaign-driven sharing over social networks is almost certain to be the norm." 

But only Democratic politicians need apply.

Of course the headlines tying Trump's 2016 campaign to data mining were quite different and less glowing than Obama's.

The New York Times wrote: "How Trump consultants' exploited the Facebook Data of millions."

Did you catch the subtle difference?

Obama = genius. Trump = exploiter and a travesty of democracy.

Ironically, Shapiro doesn't believe the "supposedly nefarious workings" of data mining by Trump's campaign made any difference in the outcome of the election.

"It didn't win Trump the election, by the way. Trump won the election because Hillary was an unbelievably crappy candidate and Trump campaigned in the right places," Shapiro said. "It's just nonsense."

It's also something to think about regarding whether or not to stay on Facebook. Maybe it's time to say "Chuck it."


Tweet

CNN's Acosta dubbed "Fake News Guru"

CNN's annoyingly rude Jim Acosta was the target of conservative angry bird tweets on Twitter after he accused the President of holding a "fake news conference." Afterward, he vomited some "fake news" of his own when he pedantically claimed that President Trump misstated the number of intelligence agencies that came to the conclusion Russia was involved with meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

Trump took questions from MSNBC and The Daily Mail in a joint news conference with President Andrzej Duda (duda) in Poland. 

Acosta wasn't pleased.

"Trump finally held a news conference overseas. But he took a question from a friendly reporter [and Barack Obama never did] and then attacked CNN as 'fake news.'" Acosta tweeted, using his pinky to hit 'Send.' He went on, "Isn't it a 'fake news conference' to take a question from a reporter who is essentially an ally of the White House?" [Because Barack Obama had no allies in the news media.]

Acosta was probably referring to The Daily Mail's U.S. political editor David Martosko, a journalist who was possibly being considered for Trump's communication department but pulled out of the running.

Of course, right-wing social media folks went after the CNN "journalist's" sarcastic tweets, saying that the Obama Administration was inundated with friendly reporters who thought Obama could do no wrong and that he often called on friendly journalists.

Some even helped him without his ever asking--Candy Crowley comes to mind.

Donald Trump Jr. even got into the act, tweeting: "So by that logic, was every news conference for the last 8 years #fakenews Jim?"

Steve Deace, a conservative radio host tweeted: "Jim, over two dozen 'journalists' went to work in the Obama WH, including the former WH spokesman."

There's no doubt that 'journalists' tend to be liberal--more than 9 out of 10 vote Democrat and donate to the Democratic Party. 

There is also no doubt that Obama's press conferences could have been used as campaign ads for his party and the questions he often got were powderpuff softballs.

An Atlantic article in 2013 noted Time managing editor Rick Stengel was "at least the 24th journalist to work for the Obama Administration." 

Obama's White House Press Secretary Jay Carney also worked for Time as the Washington Bureau Chief.

While on CNN's "New Day" after Trump's joint news conference Thursday, Jimbo repeated the "fake news" schtick to describe an answer Trump gave to a question about Russian meddling in the election.

"The other thing that was 'fake news' coming from President Trump is when he said, 'Well, I keep hearing it's 17 intelligence agencies that say Russia meddled in the election; I think it's only three or four,'" Acosta said. "Where does this 'three or four' number come from? My suspicion . . . is that if we go to the administration and ask them for this question, I'm not so sure we're going to get an answer." 

Here's the answer, Jimmy: The New York Times, and other media outlets, reported for months that "17 American intelligence agencies" agreed Russia orchestrated cyber-attacks before the election. BUT ON JUNE 28, THE NEW YORK TIMES ISSUED A CORRECTION. 

The Times noted "the assessment was made by four intelligence agencies--the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency.

Of course, The Times put the correction at the bottom of the page where only people with OCD would see it.

Certainly not Jimmy A.



Tweet

"Nawlins July 4th boat parade canceled because Trump won and I can't take it"

The hypocrites on the left attacked Trump before the election regarding his somewhat ambivalent-sounding remark of whether he would accept the results. Now the founder of a popular annual July 4th boat parade in New Orleans has canceled because of the 2016 election results.

"When I think about wearing my flag dress and waving flags; I don't know what it means this year," said Katrina Brees in an interview with The Times Picayune. "There are a lot of questions about our government."

Yes, a lot of questions such as: why must leftists have to accept the results of a national election if they don't agree with who should have won? It isn't fair, I tell you . . . sob, sob.

The July 4th Flotilla paraded around Bayou St. John every year since 2012, but Brees said her "heart is just not in it this year." And her brain never was, apparently.

She also expressed concern about large, rowdy crowds of barfing liberals, garbage they toss hoping somebody's mother will graciously pick up after them, costume remnants such as disturbing severed heads of President Trump, fireworks and boats left behind to be used for "Flex Seal" commercials by Phil Swift.

One feature the parade would have featured was a coronation of royalty in Krewe of Kolossos, a mobile spectacle that transforms trash into art, which can also be said about the Democratic platform.

The truth is, Brees is sick and tired of picking up after the slobs who come to the parade. 

"What do they think this place is, 'Occupy Wall Street'?

But the idea of blaming Trump's win of the presidency is perfect. She knows it's cool and like totally acceptable to hate Trump in her crowd of leftists, and she can spend more time aborting her kids or something.


Tweet

Hillary wants to do what Trump did

The Woods -- In her first interview since her second miserable failure to win the presidency, Hillary Clinton called for the U.S. to bomb Syrian air fields Thursday.

Hillary came out of the woods and interviewed at the Women in the World Summit in New York. She also called Russia's interference in the election she should have won, a theft more damaging than Watergate, but not as great as the theft of the lives of four Americans in Benghazi.

Asked if she now believes that her biggest failure was not taking a tougher stand against Syria as secretary of state under President Obama, she said she favored more aggressive action against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

"I think we should have been more willing to confront Assad," she said to Nicholas Kristof of The New York Times, a far left so-called newspaper.

"I really believe we should have and still should take out his air fields and prevent him from being able to use them to bomb innocent people and drop sarin gas on them."

Then later that day, President Trump did exactly that--he bombed the Shayrat airfield near Homs, stealing Hillary's thunder. 

The former presidential election two-time loser reminded Kristof that she had advocated for a no-fly zone in Syria after leaving government. It was something weak-kneed Obama feared to do and admittedly suffered a severe case of "the willies" when he learned that about our Cruise Tomahawk missile barrage on a Syrian airfield.

Even many Democrats liked Trump's ploy and Fareed Zakaria said on CNN that he believed the surgical attack was Trump's transition into becoming our president. (That's what happens when you're Zakaria and you have your head stuck up in your nether regions because you needed a quiet place to cry after the 2016 presidential election.)

Clinton's lies came two days after the poison gas attack that killed no less than 70 men, women and children in Syria. 

It was the photos of the "beautiful little babies" that seemed to be the catalyst, this time, that got President Trump to respond to Assad's barbarity. Assad's 2013 poison gas attack that killed men, women and children didn't have the same effect, but Trump wasn't president then and he may have gained a new perspective on the death of babies. 

It certainly didn't get Obama to do anything about it either.

After the Assad attack on Thursday, Mr. Trump said that "something should happen" with Assad as military options were being considered.

When Hillary was asked more specifically about Russian interference in the election she lost again, she called for a bipartisan investigation.

"I don't want any Republican candidate to be subjected to what I was subjected to," she lied. "I don't want anybody running campaigns to have their communication stolen." Hillary's password is alleged to have been Kill.Bill123.

"It was a more effective theft even than Watergate," the policy-less former candidate told Kristof in front of an audience of 3,000 low-information liberals at New York's Lincoln Center.

"We aren't going to let somebody sitting in the Kremlin, with bots and trolls, try to mix up our election. We've got to end that and we have to make sure that is a bipartisan, American commitment."

Had they only used a cloth on her hard drive after each use, the Russians would've never had the goods on the Democrats.

Clinton attributed her loss this time to both WikiLeaks and FBI Director James Comey's sending a letter to Congress just days before the election saying he was reinstating an investigation into her emails. In other words, losing the election had nothing to do with her and her failure to offer a coherent policy and campaign in states she thought she didn't need to worry about. (You should've heard her scream at her 'nightmare team' when she learned she lost.)

When asked if it was bittersweet to see the Trump administration screw up in the early days, she declined to agree, but her smirk gave it away.

"I don't take any pleasure in seeing the kind of chaotic functioning," she lied.

Hillary said she has no intention of running for another public office and the American public has no intention of electing her to one. She is writing a book, she says, that partially lies about what derailed her attempt to become America's "FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAAAAA!"

"For people who are interested in this, the nearly 66 million people who voted for me, I want to give as clear and as credible an explanation as I can." [Translation: "For liberals who will believe anything I say, I want to shovel them just enough horse plop that they'll nominate Chelsea in 2020 and beat Trump.")


Tweet

Hillary did some post-election "soul-searching" & comes up empty

Hillary Clinton, former secretary of state, former senator of New York, professional politician and wife of former President William Jefferson Clinton, said that she has done her share of "soul-searching" since losing the presidential election to a TV personality and real estate investor, Donald Trump.

She has searched and searched, high and low for her soul, but cannot find it. Why? Because she doesn't have one.

The champion of identity politics said "Let us hope there is a wave of young women running for office in America." She made this statement at an event hosted by Girls, Inc., where she was receiving yet another undeserved award, the Champion for Girls Award.

I believe the term 'girls' is politically incorrect. For Clinton's people, it should be called the Champion for the Gender You Want to See Yourself As Award.

If Clinton would only get her head out of her nether regions she might discover that there is a wave of women, young and old, running for office in America, and yes, even holding office. Many of them, in fact, are in the Republican party.

Clinton, who was so arrogant in the presidential election that she didn't bother to campaign in several blue states, has since maintained a low profile and large silhouette since her miserable loss. Her comment about that loss was "life hands all of us setbacks."

For Hillary, the setback came in the form of dried up donations to her "Foundation" that helped line her pantsuit pockets. 

Once foreign countries and American interest groups realized she would not have the ability to further their needs, they dropped her faster than Bill's first move on an aide.

Clinton babbled on about future women leaders: "They are the history makers, the glass ceiling breakers of tomorrow. They are among the reasons I am so optimistic about our future."

But she wouldn't stop: "Now, I've had my ups and downs [like Bill, but not in the same way]. In the last month, I've done my share of sleeping, a little soul-searching and reflecting; long walks in the woods, and those moments. I am thankful for my own village. My community of family and friends who have supported and encouraged me," she said, alluding to her book, It Takes a Village.


Tweet

Fed. judge rejects PA recount bid

The Green Party-backed push for a presidential election recount in key battleground states in which Hillary Clinton lost, was dealt a blow by a federal judge, rejecting their nonsensical request to recount paper ballots in the Keystone State, aka Pennsylvania. The request was to also scan some county systems for signs of hacking.

But the only hacking one gets with paper ballots is the hacking down of trees to make the paper. 

The anemic Green Party has also tried to get recounts in Michigan and Wisconsin, and although the Wisconsin recount is nearly done, a federal judge halted Michigan's recount last week. This is another setback for Jill Stein and her cohorts.

U.S. District Judge Paul Diamond said there existed 6 grounds for rejection of the Green Party lawsuit, which had been opposed by Donald Trump, the Pennsylvania Republican Party and the Pennsylvania attorney general's office.

Diamond wrote that suspicion of a hacked Pennsylvania election "borders on the irrational."

"Most importantly, there is no credible evidence that any 'hack' occurred, and compelling evidence that Pennsylvania's voting system was not in any way compromised," he wrote, and added that the lawsuit suffered from a lack of standing, potentially the lack of federal jurisdiction and an "unexplained, highly prejudicial" wait before filint last week's lawsuit, four weeks after the November 8th election. 

The lawyers for Stein and company aren't sure if they're going to appeal "But one thing is clear," said the lawyer Ilann Maazel, "The Pennsylvania election system is not fair to voters and voters don't know if their votes counted, andthat's a very large problem."

No, the very large problem is from people like Stein who put doubts in our election system and only do it to fill the coffers of her leftist party whose only real global ideas come from their relationship with plants.


Tweet

Self righteous indignation in our schools

A conservative high school in Texas performed a skit depicting the assassination of Barack Obama. This was just one example of the frustration across the country of having a lame duck president who divided the nation, lowered the average family income, created a health care system based on a lie to the American public, and divided the nation along racial lines. 

Just kidding--the skit was actually about the assassination of President-elect Donald Trump. It's merely one example of the lack of respect for the electoral process and exemplifies the inferiority of our public schools.

The skit was performed at San Antonio's Marshall High School where officials claimed they took "appropriate action" following the skit in which a student acting as Trump was shot by a classmate using sound effects of gunfire from a cellphone. The so-called 'appropriate action' may have been something as drastic as school officials refusing to clap after the performance.

Some of the parents say that harsher punishment is needed and some people worry that political polarization has become endemic in the schools.

One parent, Melinda Bean, told the San Antonio Express-News, "Honestly, I have run out of words to describe how angry I am and how shocked I am that they're still in school today." She was referring to school officials who allowed this to happen and the idiots who performed the skit.

But this was hardly the only controversial anti-Trump activity happening across the country. And while most media coverage focuses on scattered violent protests around the country, it is now obvious that the election reverberations are being felt down to elementary school levels.

Personally, I'm going to wait and see what Trump is going to do with all of the promises he made that got him elected. When he does good things as I see it, I will praise him. When he screws up, I will call it as I see it.

However, teachers allowing demonstrations, particularly like the one in San Antonio depicting the assassination of the President-elect, are not teaching democracy--they are teaching anarchy.

Judith Myers-Walls, a professor emerita of human development and family studies at Purdue University said to FoxNews.com spoke to FoxNews.com and said "This election was unusually nasty. It was, in many ways, at a child's level with the candidates at times acting like they were in pre-school." She said that with the omnipresent media coverage and constant TV, Internet and social media coverage of the candidates, it's no wonder that young students picked up slogans like "Build the Wall" and "Lock Her Up," without understanding what they actually mean.

Myers-Walls explained that it's important that parents and teachers talk to students when they see them expressing these types of behavior and it's even more important to know when to introduce them to what's going on regarding politics.

I would add that schools have the responsibility  to present balanced political views rather than the views of teachers. That it will ever happen in our lifetime is highly optimistic and probably a pipe dream.

Finally, the fact that our so-called president refuses to condemn the election protests shows us who he really is--an insufferable Alinskyite who never lets a tragedy go to waste. I just hope he doesn't declare a national emergency requiring martial law and an extension of his term as POTUS. Actually, I've heard that notion before, but I suspect he doesn't have the testicular fortitude to try it. 



Tweet

Will Trump do what Trump promised?

President-elect Donald Trump has repeated his promise to build a wall across the southern border, repeal and replace ObamaCare and deport criminal illegal aliens. 

He also promised to "lock her up," referring to Hillary Clinton over her illegal personal server and "pay to play" with the Clinton Foundation. He said that he would appoint a special prosecutor and keep Comey out of the picture.

There will be a wall and the roads will be rebuilt along with other infrastructure, the debt will be paid, jobs will be in abundance and  there will be unicorns and rainbows. 

Yes, the world will respect us again. 

Except maybe the wall will not run across the entire southern border. "Certain areas, a wall is more appropriate," President-elect Trump said. "I'm very good at this; it's called construction." Other parts may have a fence and lots of Border Security guards watching to make sure nobody crosses over our border.

And maybe repealing "all" of ObamaCare won't be necessary. Maybe we can leave in the parts about keeping your under 26-year-old kid on the policy and leave in the pre-existing conditions clause.

And deporting 2-3 million illegal immigrants doesn't have to happen so fast, but we can deport the felons and rapists and drug dealers, and other 'very very' bad people. And let's not forget about the plan of "extreme vetting" of Syrian refugees.

"What we are going to do is get the people that are [criminals] and have criminal records, gang members, drug dealers," Trump said on '60 Minutes.' "We have a lot of these people. Probably two million, it could be even three million. We are getting them out of our country or we are going to incarcerate . . . after the border is secured and after everything gets normalized . . . we're going to make a determination on [other undocumented immigrants] . . . But before we make that determination . . . we want to secure our border."

So even though he promised us in the primaries that he would immediately deport all 11 million illegal immigrants living here, it's clear now that the Republican administration was "not looking for mass deportations." 

That should make many undocumented Democratic voters happy.

The "lock her up" thing?

Well, maybe we're being too harsh on Clinton. Maybe we should take care of more important matters.

"She did some bad things, I mean she did some bad things," Trump told Leslie Stahl of "60 Minites" in that way he has of using monosyllabics and repetition for emphasis or to show that he really really means it.

Stahl responded, "I know, but a special prosecutor?"

"I don't want to hurt them, I don't want to hurt them," Trump said. "They're, they're good people. I don't want to hurt them."

He really doesn't want to hurt them, I can tell you that.

Trump told "60 Minutes" that he would eschew the $400 thousand per year salary and only take a dollar as president.

When talking about the recent anti-Trump riots that are going on across the country he said the media coverage represented a "double standard." He added that "If Hillary had won and if my people went out and protested, everybody would say, 'Oh, that's a terrible thing.' And it would have been a much different attitude. There is a different attitude."

Trump added, however, that he was "saddened" by reports that some of his supporters harassed minorities since the election.

"And I say, 'Stop it.' . . . I will say this, and I will say right to the cameras: Stop it."

Let me be clear, I am willing to give Donald Trump the chance to follow up on his promises. I want him to succeed, unlike some leftists who would rather have the country go down with the new 'Captain,' so to speak. 

There is no way that Hillary Clinton should have been elected, in spite of those low information voters who believe otherwise. The best thing about this election for me, wasn't that Trump won, it was that the Clinton machine and its arrogant belief that Hillary was destined to victory lost. 

I have to admit, the tears of the snowflakes on the left were a wonderful thing to see.



Tweet

Conway says Dems should call for calm, warns Reid to be "very careful"

Kellyanne Conway, President-elect Trump's senior adviser called on Democratic celebrities, including President for now Obama, and un-indicted felon Hillary Clinton, to go public and call for an end to violent protests over the democratic election results.

Conway also warned Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (aka "Hairy Weed") to "be very careful" about his personal attacks on Trump.

"I am calling for responsibility and decency. I hope President Obama says, 'Cut it out,'" she said on "Fox News Sunday." 

"Everybody is looking for a peaceful transition, and you have the Senate minority leader acting like a garden variety political pundit" [with the voice of a little girl].

"I think that the president of the United States, Secretary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, perhaps, others can come forward and ask for calm and ask for a peaceful transition and ask their supporters, which are masquerading as protesters now--many of them professional and paid by the way, I'm sure--ask them to give this man a chance so that this country can flourish," Conway added.

Conway, the first female to run a successful presidential campaign, warned Reid, who thankfully is about to retire in January, to "be very careful about characterizing someone in a legal sense" regarding the attacks he levied on Trump. She said, however, that she was not suggesting legal action was pending, [but if he wanted to, Trump could make Harry disappear].

Reid, in his supreme lack of infinite wisdom, said that Trump has the responsibility for healing a divided, post-election America and that he was "a sexual predator who lost the popular vote and fueled his campaign with bigotry and hate."

In truth, it wasn't bigotry and hate that fueled Trump's campaign, it was the failed policies of Obama and the left that did the fueling. The election, as they say, was a referendum on Obama, and the fact that Clinton was his political clone with a much shriller scream.

In typical intolerant liberal fashion, the nation-wide protests of the democratically decided election were violent and paid for, possibly by George Soros. In Portland, Oregon, one protester was shot, but I suspect he wasn't just singing "We Shall Overcome."

In another incident, a man was taken from his car by a pair of black men as a crowd on the sidelines watched the two punch and kick him because they assumed he voted for Trump. 

Conway called for peaceful demonstrations suggesting that some of the violent protesters are former Clinton-backers or paid professionals and "there for nefarious reasons."

"They are booing and spitting on us," Conway said. "I don't like it."

Conway said that Trump would consider amending ObamaCare "out of respect" for the president, after he met with the Celebrity in Chief on Thursday. However, that might not sit well with those who voted for him as he promised a complete repeal of ObamaCare.

"Mr. Trump has made it very clear what his health care plan would look like, and it's not ObamaCare," Ms. Conway told Fox News. And she also made it clear that Trump plans to get rid of the mandate that forces people to buy the plan.

The "stupidity of the American voter" was overestimated by Jonathan Gruber.

We shall also see what becomes of the proverbial wall that has been promised in his campaign. I hope Trump delivers on that, but it's going to be interesting to see if Mexico pays for the damn thing. More importantly, if he is able to stem the flow of illegal immigration, I don't care if it's a wall that does it or better border security.

The election victory of Donald Trump was spectacular. The defeat of Hillary Clinton and the look on her face was wonderful. 

But the tears shed by liberals who thought Hillary was a foregone conclusion to take over where Obama left off was priceless.




Tweet

The anarchists' beat goes on

Removing the coward's graffiti 

The anarchists are running the asylum.

Now that Donald Trump trumped Hillary Clinton in the presidential election, the small-minded leftists cannot bear it. And while the liberal media warned the country that if Clinton won the election, Trump supporters would become violent, it looks like they're guilty of what they've accused his supporters.

The anger is so palpable that there is a flood of calls on Twitter and other social media to assassinate Trump. This coming from the party of abject intolerance of anything that doesn't give them what they want.

Fortunately, the online threats are going to be investigated by authorities. The first place they should look is the server of George Soros, but they probably won't.

It isn't that Soros would actually make the threats himself, but I have no doubt that he would pay for someone to do it for him. As it stands at this moment some people believe that Soros has other plans and that they involve the Clintons in what is being called the Purple Revolution.

Trump met with President Obama on Thursday and called the meeting a "great honor." Obama said they had an "excellent" and "wide-ranging" conversation, and he urged people to "now come together."

The urging wasn't strong enough to stop the rioting nor the calls for Trump's assassination. Twitter went viral with the hashtag #AssassinateTrump. 

His plans when Hillary would be
away are crushed

Secret Service spokeswoman, Nicole Mainor, declined to comment on the posts directly, obviously keeping it a secret as to what they plan to do, as per agency policy. "The Secret Service does not provide information regarding protective services," she said.

However, one source told The Post that they will investigate all social service media postings containing credible threats, explaining that there's a difference between saying you have a plan to actually commit the act, and to call for someone else to do it. The source explained that normally, indirect threats are not prosecuted.

Of course, everyone knows that if the Trump supporters called for the assassination of Hillary Clinton had she won, the media would go crazy calling the miscreants "perverts of democracy" or some such thing. 

And it is indeed a perversion of democracy when a fair and democratic election chose Trump to be President and some on the left are trying to stop it with violence.

Definitely not a Benghazi victime's wife
or mother

The best form of protest, obviously, is at the ballot box, but when you're dealing with people, many of whom probably didn't even vote in the election, but refuse to accept the best form of government on earth, you know the anarchists are running the asylum.

I hope this all turns out to be talk and no action. Donald Trump has been elected President and the left needs to accept it and try to make peaceful changes . . . after many of them stop weeping.



Tweet

Lying Amy Schumer refuses to leave for Spain

Amy Schumer, like many liberals, lied when she said to the BBC Newsnight that if Donald Trump wins the presidency she will move to Spain. 

Schumer, who is a distant cousin of Sen. Chuck Schumer (Duh-NY) but has significantly smaller nostrils and smaller mind, said she was only joking when she made the promise. That's too bad for the U.S.A. but great for Spain, a country that knows what the absence of talent looks like.

"My act will change because I will need to learn to speak Spanish because I will move to Spain or somewhere. It's beyond my comprehension if Trump won. It's too crazy."

Yes, she would've needed to learn Spanish profanity to fit her 'act.' 

But on Election Day, she took to social media to inform her low functioning fans that she was staying in America.

The sexually repugnant Schumer also had said she would move to London.

"First of all, the interview where I said I would move was in London and was said in jest. Not that anyone needs more than a headline to count something as official news," she wrote on Instagram.

Schumer wrote that she was grieving and angry because she the election didn't go her way and she hates it when she doesn't get everything she wants. "I am furious. I cry for her and for all the smart people I love . . . " referring to Hillary Clinton, the hideous un-indicted felon who believes Trump supporters are deplorable racists and misogynists--in other words, half of America. 

Other leftist celebrities who claimed they would leave the country if Trump won are Samuel L. Jackson (the "L" is for Liar), Jon Stewart, Lena Dunham, Bryan Cranston, Chelsea Handler and Erasmus Hall High School's very own Barbra Steisand (who rarely changed her gym shorts).

If even one of these liars actually relocates to Canada or elsewhere, I will give them full credit for their honesty, but when are liberals and politicians honest?

Raven-Symone said on "The View" that if Trump wins she has a plane ticket and was ready to leave. I suspect she too was lying, just like Schumer and the rest of the liberals, and they said it because they never thought he could win.

"My confession for this election is . . . [should the Republican candidate win] I'm gonna move to Canada with my entire family. I already have my ticket." 

FOX411 requested a comment from "The View" host after the election was called but she didn't return the request.

The New Yorker Magazine shot themselves in the foot after they came out with a cover photo of Trump with the word 'Loser' across his image. 

Like it or not, Trump won the election fairly. Of course the left is going to protest the electoral college system--the right would have probably done  the same thing if Trump received the popular vote. But it's not the popular vote that counts.

Period.



Tweet

Guess who 68% of Saudis wanted a Jihad alliance with

Before the presidential election, the Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies in Washington D.C. conducted an opinion poll that included nine Arab countries: Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Kuwait, Morocco, Jordan, Palestine's West Bank and Gaza Strip, Saudi Arabia and Tunisia.

In each country an average of 400 people participated in the questionnaire.

The questionnaire asked which of the U.S. presidential candidates will positively influence the U.S. policy towards the Arab region, 65 percent of Saudis said Hillary Clinton's victory would make a positive impact in the Arab region.

Further, it was revealed that 68 percent of the Saudis prefer that Clinton wins the election and 46 percent believe Donald Trump was bad.

To Saudis, preferring that Clinton wins the election means they see her as an ally in their world jihad, while they see Trump as a problem with letting them have their way with instituting a world caliphate.

"That evil Trump--he refuses to allow us to make America Islamic again."

When asked about issues the next U.S. president must focus on, the interviewees said that the first priority was not intervening in Arab countries' affairs--stay out of their business, in other words. Other priorities included combating ISIS--or help us with this affair but stay out of our their business; resolving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict--then stay out of their business; resolve the Syrian crisis--then leave them alone to fend for themselves; and to resolve the Yemen crisis--then hit the road.

The highest percentage of those who wanted Hillary to win was in Tunisia and Morocco. Maybe that's why they and others contributed so heavily to the Clinton Foundation. 

The highest percentage in favor of a Trump win was Iraq and Egypt.

Israel, though not polled, is likely to favor Trump over Clinton because he's pro-Israel while she is pro-the other guys.

For more information go to http://english.alarabiya.net/

Tweet

The system is indeed rigged

Voter fraud historically has not been a big issue in the United States, but what I call 'campaign fraud' is now an issue.

An additional WikiLeaks revelation show that Hillary Clinton's campaign got even more help in advance of CNN's primary town hall debates and was tipped off to the network's polling.

The emails that were hacked from Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta and sent to WikiLeaks originally showed then-CNN contributor Donna Brazile sending two debate questions to top Clinton aides. Brazile later became the DNC Interim Chairwoman.

Brazile denied the allegations of cheating on behalf of Hillary Clinton, but another email released yesterday (Monday) showed that she had forwarded at least two additional questions to Clinton's team to give her a leg up on her opponent, and to show herself what "Stronger Together" really means.

Trump's response was a bit of a non sequitur: "She got a lot of questions at the debate," he began. "I mean, if you were at West Point and you got questions like that, they would throw you out of the school if you didn't report yourself. She didn't report it . . . She took the questions. She got the answers.

"I mean she would've been thrown out of West Point or the Air Force Academy--and here we have her running for president," Trump said.

Another WikiLeaks email depicted Brazile detailing a question that would be posed by an audience member "with a rash" before a March 6th CNN debate in Michael Moore's town of Flint, Michigan.

Brazile's role as CNN contributor was suspended when she took over Debbie Wasserman Schultz's position as interim DNC head in July. However, on October 14, after the first emails were made public, CNN accepted her full resignation and the DNC didn't do anything but congratulate her.

Of course, Brazile lied to Fox News' Megyn Kelly and denied all wrongdoing with all the indignation she could muster. She said in an Oct. 11 statement: "As it pertains to the CNN Debates, I never had access to questions and would never have shared them with the candidates if I did."

And Bill Clinton never had sex with "that woman."

 The Clinton News Network even received some DNC "brainstorming" questions for upcoming interviews of Republican presidential candidates.

"Wolf Blitzer is interviewing Trump on Tues ahead of his foreign policy address on Wed. Please send me thoughts by 10:30 AM tomorrow," Lauren Dillon, DNC research director wrote in late April.

It was apparent that CNN had direct contact with Dillon, but not with the RNC.

The same tactic was used in a Ted Cruz interview by CNN in which some of the questions were provided by the DNC. 

Dillon also wrote: "CNN is looking for questions. Please send some topical/interesting ones. Maybe a couple on Fiorina."

Trump is right when he says the system is rigged. We all knew that, but it's almost incredible just how rigged it is.


Tweet

Election Day Brain Flush

It's "Judgment Day" in the USA where voters are going to the voting polls and casting their vote[s] for Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton. It's going to be very interesting, folks, no matter who wins.

On one hand, this is the first election where we have an actual 'outsider' with no political experience but plenty of business experience, both positive and negative.

On the other hand, this is the first election in which both candidates are viewed more negatively than any other candidate who has ever run for the highest office in the land.

The choices are clear: you can vote for the world's most notorious narcissist, or you can vote for the world's biggest liar in a pantsuit. It's a kind of damned if you do moment, or what psychologists call a "avoidance-avoidance" situation. 

In other words, you have two negative choices to select from: "Do I eat the plate of cockroaches or the worms?"

For me, I cannot believe that anyone with a brain would vote for Hillary, except most people vote with their emotions, rather than their brain. Hillary will no doubt knock it out of the park with the vulva vote and people with TVs that only get MSNBC and CNN.

Trump will get the guy vote and the vote of people who are sick and tired of being sick and tired of the status quo in politics. He won the GOP nomination not because of his conservative ideals, but because he is a symptom of what has happened to America.

The liberals who have attacked Trump for being cozy with the Russians are grasping for straws and trying to distract us from the misdeeds of Clinton. 

If instead of running for President, Hillary was a parking garage valet, I wouldn't trust her with my car keys.

And while there are hours to go before the results are in, I have a vomit-inducing feeling that she is going to be the next president to continue our slide to the far left.



Tweet

Trump promises jobs, national security; Clinton promises not to scream

Well the cases have been made and the closing arguments are about to end as Donald Trump has promised the American public more jobs and better national security and Hillary Clinton promised the American public that she will not yell at us anymore when making speeches. 

The two most disliked people to ever run for the presidency barnstormed across the country on election eve to make their cases before the 2016 race goes to the voters. Clothespins should be handed out at all voting sites to protect our noses, but that isn't going to happen.

While Trump vowed to make America safe and prosperous again Clinton lied that she would unite the nation she and Obama helped to divide by race, party and gender.

"Anger is not a plan," she said, as she wisely pointed out the difference between plans and emotions to her low-information fan club.

Hillary said that Donald has a "divisive vision" for America after calling half of America "a basket of deplorables." She apparently doesn't know the definition of the word 'divisive.'

Trump blamed her and Bill Clinton's policies for the loss of manufacturing jobs and promised a change if elected.

"We are going to bring back jobs that have been stolen from you," he said in North Carolina. "We're going to bring back wealth taken from this country." He didn't go into detail as to how he would do it, but, on the other hand, nobody seems to know what Clinton's policy is.

Trump began his day campaigning in Florida. Clinton began her day with lying.

Tomorrow is the big day for both candidates. Let's hope the better man wins.



Tweet

Clinton Foundation chose to hide $1 million "gift" and more

The terrorist-finding nation of Qatar gave the Clinton Foundation a $1,000,000 gift which they accepted and 'forgot' to notify the State Department that it had done so. This is a clear violation of the ethics agreement Hillary Clinton signed when she unfortunately became Secretary of State in 2009.

The terms of the agreement has Clinton promising that the foundation would notify the State Department's ethics official in all cases in which a foreign government wished to donate or if a foreign donor wished to "increase materially" its contributions. 

In other words, Hillary Clinton should have notified the State Department even before the money was received so that the State Department could determine whether the foreign government was buying influence through Clinton and her position in government.

It's becoming increasingly clear that it's going to take a lot more than Hillary merely breaking the law as a knee-jerk reaction to put her away.

The million dollars was pledged in 2011 to mark Bill Clinton's 65th birthday. It certainly beats getting a tie or shirt.

Amitabh Desai, the Clinton Foundation's foreign policy director, sent out an email to colleagues saying the Qataris wanted to meet Bill Clinton "'for five minutes' in NYC to present [the] check." This was during Hillary's time as Secretary of State, a position she held and abused until Feb. 2013.

The foundation spokesman Brian Cookstra said the "gift" didn't constitute a "material increase" in Qatar's contributions.

The State Department said it had no record of the donation from the terrorist-funding nation and said  it was up to the foundation to submit it for review, which evidently, they didn't.

This was not an isolated incident in which a foreign country has given oodles of money to the Clinton Foundation, and it constitutes a serious conflict of interest at worst, or a serious lack in judgment at best.

I would put my money on both.

Donald Trump has often called for Hillary Clinton to return donations from countries that have poor human rights records, but the chances of that are about the same as a goldfish learning algebra.

The Foundation admitted that no complete list of donors to the Clinton Health Access Initiative, a health program of the foundation's, has been published since 2010, despite Clinton lying 2 years prior that a list would be published annually. 

Then we have Morocco.

Right after the first presidential debate in which Hillary skirted a question about charges of "pay to play" at the Clinton Foundation, another trove of WikiLeaks emails came out with charges that Hillary herself was at the heart of the $12 million commitment from Morocco's King Mohammed VI. 

The most remarkable elements of the charge is that the allegation came from Huma Weiner Abedin, Hillary's closest aide said to be like a "daughter" to her. Huma described the connection in a January 2015 email exchange with two top advisers to Hillary, John Podesta and Robby Mook.

Huma wrote that "this was HRC's idea" that she [Hillary] speak at a meeting of the Clinton Foundation in Morocco in May 2015 as an explicit condition for the $12 million commitment from the king.

Abedin wrote: "It will break a lot of china to back out now when we had so many opportunities to do it in the past few months. She created this mess and she knows it."

The "mess" partially involves the fact that the three advisers were talking about Clinton pulling out of the speaking engagement because it was scheduled only a month prior to her official launch of her presidential campaign and would look suspiciously unethical.

Hillary unethical? Who'd a thunk?

Huma wrote back later the same day suggesting that the king would be furious if Hillary pulled out of the event.

What was originally thought to be a $1 million payout by Morocco turned out to be $12 million and that was just too many greenbacks to pass up. This showed just how big a role Clinton played in bringing in the money to the foundation--but a clear conflict of interest.

"Just to give you some context, the condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation," Huma wrote. "If hrc was not part if (sic) it, meeting was a non-starter." She also added that the foundation had not come up with the idea to hold the event in Morocco--that idea was Hillary's:

"This was HRC's idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request. The King has personally committed approx $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting."

One can only wonder what big foreign donors to the Clinton Global Initiative got in return for the 'gifts' they gave to Hillary and her posse. 

And one can only wonder what it will take for justice to be served with the Clintons.




Tweet

Melania worked illegally in USA--liberals confused how to respond

Mental hospitals are on high alert. They anticipate a huge surge of admissions by Democrats who are experiencing a dilemma over the news that Melania Trump, wife of GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump, was paid for 10 modeling jobs in the USA before having legal standing to work here.

How can any "true blue" Democrat make a case against her? 

Democrats love illegal aliens, especially the ones who they believe will vote the Democratic ticket before, during and after they become legal citizens. Borders? Schmorders. "Let 'em all in, they say.

But Melania obviously does not fit the mold of liberal voter and Democratic heads are exploding.

Melania was paid $20,056 in the seven weeks before she had legal permission to work here, according to twenty-year-old accounting ledgers and contracts provided to the AP. 

Democrats do have a case here, however. They can attack Trump directly and leave Melania alone. 

Democrats can point out the hard line Trump has taken on immigration laws and the violators of those laws. They can point out that if Donald had been president and the government used the E-verify system, Melania would have never been allowed to work here.

Here's what happened: Melania got her green card in March 2001 and became a citizen in 2006. She said through her attorney that she first came to the U.S. from Slovenia on August 27, 1996 on a B1/B2 visitor visa then got an H-1B work visa on October 18, 1996.

But the documents show that she was paid for the 10 modeling assignments between September 10th and October 15th, at a time she was allowed to be in the U.S., but not allowed to work, although she was permitted to look for work at that time.

The government can legally revoke her U.S. citizenship status, but unless Hillary Clinton wins the presidency, it is highly unlikely. That's normally done in cases of terrorism or war crimes.

Melania had an immigration lawyer, Michael J. Wildes, review her immigration documents and some of the ledgers at the AP's request.

Wildes said that "these documents, which have not been verified, do not reflect our records including corresponding passport stamps." He elaborated no further nor answer any questions. Trump's campaign spokeswoman Hope Hicks also did not answer written questions from the AP.

As Election Day is just hours away, there is an odor in the air coming in all directions.


Tweet

How it adds up for the election so far

With just three weeks to the presidential election, Donald Trump is trailing Hillary Clinton in the polls, which makes the prediction easy that Trump will say the polls don't matter, the election's rigged and Hillary should be in jai.

As it stands, Hillary has a six-point lead over Donald, 45-39 percent, according to a useless poll of likely voters, a poll that doesn't matter to Trump because he's behind. Gary "Good Weed" Johnson stands at 5 percent and Green Party Jill "Spoiler" Stein is at 3 percent.

In a head-to-head matchup, Hillary is up at 49-42 percent, an edge that's slightly above the margin of error, but it still doesn't matter to Trump because as far as he's concerned, the election is rigged and there's absolutely no reason for any American to go out and vote. "Hillary's gonna win, folks. She's gonna win, I can tell you."

The third and final debate will be tomorrow on Fox News Channel and moderated by Chris Wallace. This is the first time Fox will be moderating a presidential debate because the media is rigged folks, that I can tell you. Believe me.

According to the polls, a large gender gap exists. Among men, Trump leads by 7 points and Clinton is ahead by 17 points among women. She also leads among non-whites, you know, those who the party of the KKK, Bull Connor, Robert Byrd and George Wallace have convinced will be better served by them. 

Hillary also leads among naive voters under 30 (+19). Johnson and Stein are supported by one in five, young, pot smoking socialists who have no knowledge of economics. College degree whites also favor Clinton by 9 points, but whites without a college degree but a chip on their shoulder favor Trump by 27 points. He's also favored by veterans by 17 points and religious people by 16 points. Hillary has the atheist vote cornered along with the seriously uninformed voter vote.   

Trump has a slight lead with independents at 7 points but only 80 percent of Republicans back him--the other 20 percent back Stephen Harper, the former conservative Prime Minister of Canada.

For both Trump and Clinton, supporters are about equally matched on strength of support and interest, but if Donald Trump doesn't try throwing in a few different words in his speeches, the strength of support and interest may fade. 

Believe me, folks.

Temperament is a different story. About 61 percent of voters say Clinton has the temperament to serve effectively as POTUS while 61 percent of voters say Trump does not. 

He plans to bomb the s**t out of those who say he does not.

Clinton leads Trump by voters who believe she has the judgment to serve (53-46 percent), while Trump is the opposite (37-60 percent) but the truth is, neither candidate will ever replace Judge Judy or Charles Krauthammer.

Many voters do not believe the media is being fair to the candidates. Fifty-one percent say the news coverage of Trump has been fair  (46 percent) or biased in his favor (5 percent), but 43 percent say it's been unfairly biased against him.

After further exploration, it seems more likely that Donald Trump has been biased against himself as some of the topics his ego refuses to let go of continue to hurt him.

Only 11 percent of voters believe Clinton has been treated unfairly by the media, and those voters would say the same thing if Hillary was caught on video having sex with a Girl Scout against her will.


Tweet

More Trump accusers from years gone by

It has become a media circus with the Donald Trump sexual misconduct accusers. Soon, even Jill Stein might think about jumping on the "Trump Touched Me" bandwagon in order to gin up sympathy and perhaps three more votes in her bid for the White House.

Two more women accused Trump of sexual assault Friday. However, a relative of one of the women said that the allegation was "an attempt to regain the spotlight." 

No, it isn't Monica Lewinsky.

Summer Zervos, a former contestant on "The Apprentice" said Trump groped her and kissed her after a meeting at a Beverly Hills hotel in 2007 to discuss a job. She spoke at a press conference with her "Lawyer of the Stars" Gloria Allred and said that after the groping and kissing she was offered a lower-paying job at one of Trump's golf courses.

"You do not have the right to treat women as sexual objects just because you are a star," Zervos said, directing her verbiage at Trump [rather than Bill Clinton] as an old fashioned cash register went "Cahching" in Allred's head. 

On Friday, the Trump campaign released a statement purported to be from John Barry, a cousin of Zervos, in which he said he was "shocked and bewildered" by her account.

Barry said in the statement that Zervos spoke highly of Trump until he refused an invitation to visit her restaurant during the primary campaign. "I think Summer wishes she could still be on reality TV, and in an effort to get that back she's saying all of these negative things about Mr. Trump. That's not how she talked about him before."

Trump's wife, Melania, said that Zervos was a "narcissistic loony toon" oh wait--that was Hillary describing Monica Lewinsky after her husband had sex with her when she was his 21-year-old intern.

My mistake.

Trump issued a statement saying he "never met [Zervos] at a hotel or greeted her inappropriately a decade ago. That is not who I am as a person, and it is not how I've conducted my life." He also said that she emailed him in April asking if he could visit her restaurant in California.

Allred said that Zervos is not filing suit at this time, but has said that "many more women" have contacted her about Donald Trump.

Cahching.

Trump is claiming all of the controversy was "a total setup" made up of "lies spread by the media" to undermine his campaign. 

That may be true, and it probably is to some extent, but Trump isn't helping himself by making fun of her saying: "The only way they can figure they can slow it down is to come up with people that are willing to say 'Oh I was with Donald Trump in 1980,'" in a voice mocking his accusers. "I was sitting with him on an airplane and he went after me on the plane.' Yeah, I'm gonna go after you . . . "

"Believe me, she would not be my first choice, I can tell you," he concluded.

Mocking her appearance is not going to win Trump any major votes with women. But that isn't why he said it. For Trump, it's more important to defend his masculinity and ego than it is to be prudent and strategic in this election. 

He acts as if his base can vote twice for him. That's only true for Democrats.

Speaking of strategy, all of this scandalous garbage has taken the focus off Hillary Clinton's WikiLeaks document dump.

This is what Trump needs to be focused on, not his ego needs.


Tweet

Newt: "Little Trump is frankly pathetic"

Newt Gingrich described a small man inside of Donald Trump who lashes out at his Republican allies and is "frankly pathetic."

"Donald Trump has one opponent. Her name is Hillary Clinton. Her name is not Paul Ryan. It's not anybody else," Newt told Fox Business. 

This came after Trump ranted on Ryan at a Florida rally Wednesday. Donald was upset that Ryan didn't congratulate him after the second presidential debate on Sunday. 

"Look, first of all, let me just say about Trump, who I admire and I've tried to help as much as I can. There's a big Trump and a little Trump. The little Trump is frankly pathetic. I mean, he's mad over not getting a phone call?"

I see Trump not only as pathetic, but as a guy whose narcissism gets in the way of his judgment. And I don't mean it in a disparaging way, but in a clinical sense. 

The Mayo Clinic defines narcissistic personality disorder thus: "a mental disorder in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for admiration and a lack of empathy for other. But behind this mask of ultra-confidence lies a fragile self-esteem that's vulnerable to the slightest criticism."

Narcissists uses others as their mirror. If the mirror reflects an unflattering reflection, the narcissist feels injured and perhaps insulted, and becomes angry. In Ryan's case, Trump felt he was being "disloyal" to him and went ballistic on Twitter. 

Ryan, of course, felt he couldn't support Trump after the audio and video of his "locker room talk"with then-host of "Access Hollywood" Billy Bush went public.

Trump doesn't know when to let something go and campaign against his opponent. His narcissism gets in the way. 

He needs to make it clear what he will do the day he becomes president. He needs to do this consistently. He needs to stop attacking Clinton and the Republican Party and talk about his differences POLITICALLY and stop preaching to the choir of voters who are going to vote for him even if he shoots someone on Broadway.

We know about "the wall." We know who's going to build it. We know you probably did at least half the things those women are accusing you of, but Hillary is worse and we know it. 

Now is the time to drop the schtick and get on the stick. 



Tweet