Dem. PA election official now sorry for her comments regarding illegal votes as recount begins

Not Jill Biden

A Democrat election official in Pennsylvania claimed that court precedent "doesn't matter in this country" and that she was going to count the illegal votes of non-citizens in the state for the U.S. Senate race as the recount begins. 

In a meeting last week, Bucks County Commissioner Diane Ellis-Marseglia, a Democrat [of course] voted to count provisional ballots that were missing one of two required voter signatures, which is illegal and she was knew this after being told by a county attorney that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had previously ruled that the ballots cannot be counted.

David McCormick

"We all know that precedent by a court doesn’t matter anymore in this country and people violate laws any time they want," Ellis-Marseglia said in a viral clip on social media. "So for me, if I violate this law, it’s because I want a court to pay attention to it. There is nothing more important than counting votes."

Citizen of PA were livid and she faced them at a packed meeting where she tried to hang onto her job and read out an apology on Wednesday while people called out for her to resign.

"Last Thursday, when I spoke at the meeting that you’re all here about, the passion in my heart got the best of me, and I apologize again for that. That was a hearing, and we were talking about provisional ballots. We were specifically talking about the fact that there were certain provisional ballots where a judge of elections did not sign and did not make sure that a voter signed on the outside envelope. To me, it was frustrating and unconscionable that we would have to take away somebody’s vote not because they made a mistake, but because an employee, one of our members … one of the judges of elections didn’t know what to do or forgot or made a mistake. That issue that I spoke on has now gone viral from my comments. It was genuinely not the best words. I would do it all again. I feel terrible about it. I should have been more clear, please, I will be more clear in the future."

She claimed that her reference to court precedent related to the U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v Wade – a bs claim that drew loud groans from the crowd. 

"I remind you all that we all say things that are out of turn, we all made mistakes. I made a mistake! And because I am an election official, I am held to a far higher standard than everybody else. When I inartfully spoke and used the word precedent when I was talking about provisional ballots, I was referring to the United States Supreme Court, and the precedent that has been lost on many issues including Roe v. Wade."

The public booed her and loudly groaned as she pounded her gavel and said,  "If you would just bear with me for one more minute!" She continued: 

"Unfortunately, I took my frustration out on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, many of whom are friends of mine who I respect, and whose decisions are complicated and difficult and important. We are all going to learn lessons from this new media landscape. And most of all, I am. I am a small fish in this big pond. I do not have a megaphone on Twitter or CNN, or I am not a secretary of state, I don't run a presidential campaign. This is the only opportunity that I have had to set the record straight."

Ellis-Marseglia claimed she received messages from hundreds of people, and "all of them involved horrible, horrible expletives," and many of them included death threats against her and her family, she maintained. Whether or not this is true is unclear.

Bob Casey

When Ellis-Marseglia first spoke, conservatives blasted her for her threatening to break the law. 

Pennsylvania's state Supreme Court on Monday weighed in on a flashpoint amid ongoing vote counting in the U.S. Senate election between Democratic Sen. Bob Casey and Republican David McCormick, ordering counties not to count mail-in ballots that lack a correct handwritten date on the return envelope. Casey has refused to concede the race, which The Associated Press called in favor of McCormick earlier this month, Fox News reported.

Gov. Josh Shapiro (D-PA) said a lack of legal clarity regarding the ballots and how they're to be counted, puts county officials in a tenuous position where they were "damned if they did and damned if they didn’t — likely facing legal action no matter which decision they made on counting."

McCormick currently leads by .24% as of Thursday morning, according to Pennsylvania's election results website. A recount is triggered under state law by a margin of .5% or lower. The statewide recount began Wednesday morning. It must conclude by Nov. 26.

May the force be with McCormick.

Tweet

MSNBC's Johnson says whites prefer inconvenience over letting blacks vote

This Johnson is a Johnson

MSNBC contributor Jason Johnson went all racist Monday on "Deadline" a TV show they tell me. He claimed that Republicans pass voting laws because many white people “would rather have their own lives inconvenienced than run the risk of black people being on an equal plane.”

These same white people also pass drivers license laws, federal building entry laws, getting on airlines laws, and visiting the DNC laws for the same reason. We inconvenience ourselves with these requirements because we believe black people are incapable of getting ID.

But wait; plenty of them seem to have gotten past these white folks traps and got the necessary IDs and even obtained driver's licenses and don't even need to use mail-in voting because many of them can drive to the polls. How did they do that? 

Do you mean to tell us white folk that black people are able to overcome the man and get IDs for themselves?

I'm not even going to quote this moron [yes, moron knows no color] because it's clear to me that he is the real racist here.

There have been historical numbers of black voters recorded in the last elections, both in the presidential and he midterms and nobody is putting speed bumps on the roads to slow anyone from voting. And to say that Republicans are doing that is a lie, it's racist, and it's reprehensible. It's the same old lament from the party that has no useful ideas and has nothing but complaints about the USA, and no ideas on how to fix anything. 

Tweet

RNC sues 2 VT cities for 'radical scheme' that allows non-citizens to vote in municipal elections

The Republican National Committee (RNC) has joined the Vermont Republican Party in a lawsuit against Montpelier and Winooski after these locations have amended their charters allowing non-citizens to vote in municipal elections. The new state law had passed in the spring.

The RNC news release called the law a "radical scheme passed by Vermont Democrats, to allow foreign citizens to decide American elections." 

That is absolutely and factually correct.

The release labeled the effort "a blatant attack on election integrity and violates the state constitution which requires Vermont voters to be U.S. citizens.”

RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel provided tough words in response to the new Vermont voting changes and tweeted:

The RNC and the VTGOP are today suing the cities of Montpelier and Winooski, Vermont over their new town charters that allow noncitizens to vote in their municipal elections.

This radical scheme passed by state Democrats is a blatant attack on election integrity. pic.twitter.com/YfU2ZLxw3D

She said Tuesday in the news release: 

“Democrats are trying to dismantle the integrity of our elections. In addition to attacking widely supported safeguards like voter ID, Democrats also want foreign citizens to vote in American elections. Republicans are fighting back” –@GOPChairwomanhttps://t.co/enJeLwe3x5

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) September 28, 2021

“Republicans are fighting back on this far-left assault against election integrity — unlike radical Democrats, we believe that our elections should be decided solely by American citizens,” she added.

McDaniel also said the RNC will remain vigilant to address any state that attempts to allow non-citizens voting rights.

This is clearly an example of dirty politics and should concern all citizens. 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

The bill that would allow non-citizens to vote passed in the spring but was initially vetoed by Vermont’s Republican Gov. Phil Scott, according to Fox News.

“Allowing a highly variable town-by-town approach to municipal voting creates inconsistency in election policy, as well as separate and unequal classes of residents potentially eligible to vote on local issues,” Scott wrote in a May letter to legislators.

However, the governor’s veto was overridden by the state House and Senate in June, Fox reported.

This is clearly an example of dirty politics and should concern all citizens.

Tweet

Stacey Abrams lied about GA voter laws, now upset by consequences

Stacey "Not Gov." Abrams

Stacey Abrams, the failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate, whined for weeks about and spread lies about the state's new voting reform law. She said it was "a redux of Jim Crow in a suit and tie.” And it was her lies about the bill that likely scared the cowards of Major League Baseball to move the All-Star game out of Atlanta.

The loser gubernatorial candidate's full statement to MLB is as follows:

Republicans who passed and defended Senate Bill 2020 did so knowing the economic risks to our state. They prioritized making it harder for people of color to vote over the economic well-being of Georgians.

Like many Georgians, I am disappointed that the MLB is relocating the All-Star game; however, I commend the players, owners and League commissioner for speaking out. I urge others in positions of leadership to do so as well. As I have stated, I respect boycotts, although I don’t want to see Georgia families hurt by lost events and jobs. Georgians targeted by voter suppression will be hurt as opportunities go to other states. We should not abandon the victims of GOP malice and lies – we must stand together.

Georgia Republicans must renounce the terrible damage they have caused to our voting system and the harm they have inflicted on our economy. Our corporate community must get off the sidelines as full partners in this fight, acknowledging that the provisions of SB 2020 do not expand voting rights. They restrict those rights, affecting employees and consumers alike. And leaders must publicly support the voting rights provisions in the For the People Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act to mitigate the harm being done in Georgia and other states.

As other events, productions and businesses weigh whether to patronize Georgia, I urge those who can to come and speak out, and I urge those who are here to stay and fight, to stay and vote. We need you.

Her statement is a clear example of an obese woman being caught between a rock and a harder rock. She had to compliment the players for her faux outrage [if it's real, she's an imbecile] over the faux disenfranchisement of people of color while imploring them to keep the game in Atlanta. 

But the bill did not make it harder for people of color to vote--it made it easier.

The left-leaning Washington Post fact-checked the sundry complaints about the Georgia bill, which resulted in the finding that the experts it spoke to said “the net effect was to expand the opportunities to vote for most Georgians, not limit them.”

Specifically, the left-leaning Washington Post found that while house plant President Joe Biden and others claimed the new law “ends voting hours early so working people can’t cast their vote after their shift is over,” the new law does not at all limit voting hours. In fact, it extends them. 

Critics of the bill also falsely claimed the new Georgia bill would prohibit food or drink from being passed out to people waiting in line to vote. This is not a lie; it's a damn lie. The people who cannot pass out food, water or political literature to those in line waiting to vote are politicians and their staff within 150 feet of the polling area. And people are allowed to bring their own water and food if they think they'll starve or dehydrate. Poll workers within the 150 feet of the polling area can provide water or food as they see fit.

So Biden, Abrams, the media, and the entire Democratic Party are lying to the public. Even if you love baseball, you need to think about whether to support their decision to bow to the woke crowd or not watch nor attend the game.

Don't be a loser like Stacey Abrams.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Squadette Pressley wants kids to vote Democrat

Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) is shocked that 16-year-olds [who would mostly vote Democrat because their teacher would tell them to] are not allowed to vote. In fact, if it were up to Pressley, the voting age for girls would be when they have their first menstrual cycle and for boys when they identify their preferred gender.

Just because teenagers are not fully developed neurologically does not justify disqualifying them from voting. 

"In fact, it's the undeveloped cerebral cortex that is most likely to vote for socialism or Democrats who pretend not to be socialists," Dr. Jill Biden said in a hot mike to the very Reverend Al Sharptongue (BLM-Race Hustler) at a mostly peaceful BLM protest against private businesses owned by minorities. It turns out Doctor Biden was incorrect as it's the frontal lobe of the brain involved in emotions and decision-making.

Studies have shown that if teenagers tended to vote for conservative and libertarian candidates, most Democrats would make a case against the voting age they are currently proposing.

Other studies suggest that if undocumented immigrants tend to vote for conservatives and libertarians, Trump's border wall would have been completed by Obama and the Border Patrol would gain no less than 20,000 new employees.

Please consider subscribing to this free blog, Brain Flushings, and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help feed my backyard squirrel and help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

MI Republicans claim software undercounted Trump votes

It's as if the Trump legacy is a Three Act play that's playing itself out as we wait for the final election outcome.

Act One is when Trump came down the escalator, announced his run for President, and campaigned against "Low Energy Jeb"; "Lyin' Ted"; and the others.

Act Two is the Democratic Party impeaching Trump on the grounds that he colluded with the Russians to win the election. Of course, that was proved to be false, and in fact, it was Hillary Clinton, Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi and the other Democrats that were using Russian disinformation to try to pin collusion on Trump.

Act Three is this election and the outcome that will come of it. 

Will Biden, a barely sentient human being, come away from this debacle and become our next President? Will Trump keep his presidency? Will the country go into a frenzy and civil war?

Now that it seems a Trump victory might be impossible, is it just part of a third act and will there be an outcome in which Trump emerges victorious? That would be how it plays out if this was, indeed, a play.

In this third act, Trump's supporters are pointing to a small Michigan county in which vote counting software used in the entire state may have undercut Trump's number of votes.

As of this writing, Trump trails barely sentient Joe Biden by 146,123 votes in Michigan’s unofficial results, with 98 percent of the votes counted. However, in northern Antrim County thousands of votes have been counted in error for Biden as well as Democrat Sen. Gary Peters, rather than John James, the Republican candidate.

Michigan GOP Chairwoman Laura Cox said at a Friday press conference that “in Antrim County, ballots were counted for Democrats that were meant for Republicans, causing a 6,000 vote swing against our candidates. The county clerk came forward and said, ‘tabulating software glitched and caused a miscalculation of the votes.'”

Cox explained that “since then, we have now discovered that 47 counties used this same software in the same capacity,” or over half of Michigan’s 83 counties. She urged those counties to “closely examine their results for similar discrepancies.” 

The Detroit Free Press reported that Antrim County uses Dominion Voting Systems equipment. Results are stored on computer cards at precincts, where Republican observers are forbidden to observe, then uploaded to another computer by Democratic county election officials.

Well, that's no big deal, right?

Antrim County Clerk Sheryl Guy, a Republican, told the Free Press that it’s unclear if human error or a glitch caused the error, which was discovered because a Democratic wins were incongruous with the county’s conservative leanings. A manual review confirmed the error or tampering, as it were.

University of Michigan computer science professor J. Alex Halderman, a voting machine expert and former juke box repairman, told the Free Press that “it’s plausibly human error, but if a simple screw-up could cause these problems, that sounds like a technical design flaw.”

“It’s natural to wonder whether similar problems could have occurred in other jurisdictions that use the same machine. Fortunately, even if the county hadn’t noticed, this would have been caught and corrected during Michigan’s normal canvassing procedures, when they compare the results to the paper tapes from the machines,” he claimed.

A Michigan judge on Thursday tossed out a lawsuit from the Trump campaign to stop the counting of ballots in the state, ruling that the vote count had already ended in Biden’s favor. 

Trump won Michigan by just 10,704 votes in 2016 against the execrable Hillary Clinton, and Biden boasted of his apparently wider lead in Wednesday remarks, when the state’s race was still tighter.

“In Michigan, we lead by over 35,000 votes, and it is growing, a sub, a sub, a substanbilly bigger margin that George, um, President Trump won Michigan in 2016,” Biden mush mouthed in earnest.

Trump’s path to a second term appeared bleak Friday, with unofficial vote counts in Arizona, Georgia, Nevada and Pennsylvania tilting toward a confused Biden. If those results hold, Biden will become the first president-elect who does not know where he's at, who is able to distinguish his wife from his sister, and who was called a racist by his VP running mate.

In any case, he has an entire nation rooting for him--China.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon.

Tweet

Chelsea Handler "whitesplains' to 50 Cent about how to be black

Chelsea Handler was very upset with her former boyfriend, 50 Cent, and publicly blasted him on "The Tonight Show" for leaving the plantation by supporting President Trump.

The former lugubrious comedian has been undergoing a chronic hissy-fit since Monday when Mr. Cent shared a photo from a newscast on Instagram depicting the tax rates of various locations under a Joe Biden tax plan. He highlighted New York state (58%) and specifically, New York City (62%). Due to his understanding of finances and how percentages work, he has decided to vote for President Trump and tweeted:

"F--K NEW YORK The KNICKS never win anyway. I don’t care Trump doesn’t like black people 62% are you out of ya f--king mind."

The caption of the graph read: "WHAT THE F--K! (VOTE ForTRUMP) IM OUT,"

Showing her lack of understanding of Biden's tax hike, Handler insisted the 62 percent "isn't a plan" under Biden, calling it a "lie" during her interview with "Tonight Show" host Jimmy Fallon.

No, the real lie was the one that Biden told about fracking.     

"So he doesn't want to pay 62 percent in taxes because he doesn't want to go from '50 Cent' to '20 Cent' and I had to remind him that he was a Black person, so he can’t vote for Donald Trump and that he shouldn't be influencing an entire swath of people who may listen to him because he's worried about his own personal pocketbook,“ Handler said. 

In other words, if you don't vote for Biden "you ain't black." What a racist thing to say as a white person to a black person. 

Chelsea Handler is a racist by the left's standards.

Handler said she "hasn't heard back" from Mr. Cent but told Fallon she's willing to "seal the deal in more ways than one" in order to get her ex-boyfriend to publicly denounce Trump. In other words, she would prostitute herself for one Biden vote.

It isn't known whether or not Handler is willing to do this with other undecided voters or Trump voters, but if you don't ask her, you'll never know. She sounds rather easy going, if you know what I mean.

C'mon, man. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear.

Tweet

Not the Babylon Bee: Trump pardons Susan B. Anthony, NYT 'cancels' her

John Kasich prepares to do a DNC ad

It's so predictable as to be funny. 

When President Trump says "black," the leftist media says "white." Now that Trump has posthumously pardoned Susan B. Anthony for her arrest in 1872 in violation of the voting law that only permitted men to vote, Democrats, members of the media, and the New York Times, an excellent birdcage crap-catcher, went after Anthony's past. [They had to go back well over a century to come up with their findings.]

Trump pardoned Anthony on Tuesday which marked the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment, which gave women the right to vote. He pardoned the famous suffragette for the 1872 arrest; she was later convicted for voting illegally and sentenced to pay a whopping $100 fine for court costs.

The former newspaper reported on the President's pardon of Anthony and said of her: "She is also an increasingly divisive figure, adopted by anti-abortion forces and criticized for relegating Black suffragists to the sidelines."

Yes, it was horrible that she was against the killing of the unborn, but give her a break--these were pre-woke days. 

"Susan B. Anthony was pardoned and canceled on the same day," Bearing Arms editor Cam Edwards tweeted.

"They’re gonna do it. They’re really gonna cancel Susan B Anthony," conservative commentator Drew Holden said.

The far-left outlet NowThis later in the day posted a video explaining "why Susan B. Anthony doesn’t deserve your ‘I Voted’ stickers, highlighting the tradition of women voters who place such stickers on Anthony's gravestone." In fact, according the the outlet, Susan B. Anthony deserves the scorn of women who have been born, and they should topple her grave and kick dirt in her cold, dead eye sockets.

It only became an issue for the left when Trump got involved and pardoned her. Had he kicked dirt in her cold, dead eye sockets, they would have excoriated him and called him a misogynist, racist, bad orange man.

"They have perpetuated idealized versions of Anthony and her white colleagues such as Carrie Chapman Catt and Elizabeth Cady Stanton," NowThis producer Luria Freeman said. "Evidence of their ruthless racial bias has been pushed to the shadows, enabling the erasure of their women of color counterparts who also fought tirelessly for the right to vote."

This same group of virtue signaling phonies, however, refuse to go after teachers' unions for their blatant racist policies that forbid lower socio-economic families school choice, or charter schooling during the pandemic.

Freeman added, "Susan B. Anthony only appeared to care about Black people when the status quo was in her favor" and later concluded that she was not saying that Anthony was "the most racist fraud who ever lived" since there were "many more racist, white women's suffragists." For example, you have Margaret Sanger, who founded Planned Parenthood, hated blacks, Jews and applauded eugenics and the eliminating children with mental and physical abnormalities.

"Trump broke their brains.... LMAO," writer Ryan James Girdusky exclaimed.

Democrats have also condemned Trump's pardon of Anthony.

"Pathetic. Trump pardons a woman who has been dead for over 100 years to show his commitment to women. Suburban women aren’t dumb. We are all insulted," mindreader and U.S. Rep. Jackie "The Dummy" Speier (D-CA), wrote, clearly not insulted.

C'mon, man. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear.

Tweet

Cop-killer votes in Democratic primary thanks to Cuomo

The jury is still out as to who is the dumber brother in the Cuomo household, Chris or Andrew.

But today, the vote goes to Andrew, because thanks to the special needs governor of New York, parolees can now vote, and Herman Bell, best known for killing a police officer, voted in the Democratic primary between Cuomo and Cynthia Nixon.

It isn't known who Bell voted for, but hey, he's a Democrat and that's all that matters. Cuomo beat the socialist actress handily. His district went for Cuomo by more than  2 to 1 margin.

Bell filed an absentee ballot on September 12, the day before the primary. He was able to file because Cuomo, in his infinite wisdom, issued an executive order in April providing conditional pardons that restored voting rights to 25,000 parolees. And because parolees are collectively known for not being the brightest lights on the Christmas tree, they tend to vote Democrat, and you can count on most of the 25,000 to vote for the Dems too, as Andrew Cuomo does.

Bell, who is 70 and has finally outlived his IQ was released from Shawangunk Correctional Facility April 27 after being sprung by the state Parole Board. He registered to vote by mail July 19, from a Bedford-Stuyvesant address [in Brooklyn, NY] records show.

Bell is a former Black Liberation Army and Black Panther member. Back in May 1971 he cowardly ambushed and murdered NYPD Officers Joseph Piagentini and Waverly Jones in Harlem. People like Bell help lend credence to capital punishment.

People like Cuomo lend credence to voting Republican.


Click the "Follow Posts" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.




Tweet

Election Day Brain Flush

It's "Judgment Day" in the USA where voters are going to the voting polls and casting their vote[s] for Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton. It's going to be very interesting, folks, no matter who wins.

On one hand, this is the first election where we have an actual 'outsider' with no political experience but plenty of business experience, both positive and negative.

On the other hand, this is the first election in which both candidates are viewed more negatively than any other candidate who has ever run for the highest office in the land.

The choices are clear: you can vote for the world's most notorious narcissist, or you can vote for the world's biggest liar in a pantsuit. It's a kind of damned if you do moment, or what psychologists call a "avoidance-avoidance" situation. 

In other words, you have two negative choices to select from: "Do I eat the plate of cockroaches or the worms?"

For me, I cannot believe that anyone with a brain would vote for Hillary, except most people vote with their emotions, rather than their brain. Hillary will no doubt knock it out of the park with the vulva vote and people with TVs that only get MSNBC and CNN.

Trump will get the guy vote and the vote of people who are sick and tired of being sick and tired of the status quo in politics. He won the GOP nomination not because of his conservative ideals, but because he is a symptom of what has happened to America.

The liberals who have attacked Trump for being cozy with the Russians are grasping for straws and trying to distract us from the misdeeds of Clinton. 

If instead of running for President, Hillary was a parking garage valet, I wouldn't trust her with my car keys.

And while there are hours to go before the results are in, I have a vomit-inducing feeling that she is going to be the next president to continue our slide to the far left.



Tweet

Helping the helpless wannabe voter

Madison, Wis. -- Wisconsin residents who are unable to figure out how to get a photo ID before the November presidential election will still be able to vote and their vote will count as much as it does for other people who have it figured out.

U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman in Milwaukee issued a preliminary injunction that allows people who are slower or unable to leave their homes due to soap operas and other matters to sign an affidavit (if able) explaining what is their problem with simply getting photo ID. 

But Adelman is not allowing for that option for the August 9th primary as state election officials don't have adequate time to prepare for it.

"Although most voters in Wisconsin either possess qualifying ID or can easily obtain one, a safety net is needed for those voters who can't obtain qualifying ID with reasonable effort," Adelman wrote. 'The . . . affidavit option is a sensible approach that will both prevent the disenfranchisement of some voters during the pendency of this litigation and preserve Wisconsin's interests in protecting the integrity of its elections."

Findlay Flopwood, a hopeful presidential voter without a photo ID, told this reporter, "I am very, very happy with the lady judge's decision to, uh, allow me an' my kin to get the chance to vote even though I can't get me a photo Eye Dee. I been trying to get one but my 'yard car' doesn't want to start," he said, "so's I can't get me to the photo Eye Dee place. Even if it did start, nobody tole me where the Eye Dee place is at.

"But now I'm gonna get me the chance to vote and I can't wait to vote for Hillary Rottom Clinton onnaconna she's for women and gits things done. I too am for wimin. I love me the wimin so's I'm gonna vote for Hillary. Yo."

It was later learned that Mr. Flopwood's 'lawn car' was out of gas but his driver's license had expired seventeen years ago and the photo was unrecognizable. 

The hurdles these poor, incompetent voters face are, for them, insurmountable. They need all the help they can get.


Tweet

Sanders and the fate of the Paw People

"Paw people don't vote," Bernie Sanders complains, and he doesn't mean animals with paws. He's talking people in poverty. He's using that as an excuse to explain why he, a socialist, is losing to the felon, Hillary Clinton.

Bernie was asked on "Meet the Press" Sunday why he consistently loses to the most distrusted, unlikeable, loud-mouthed candidate of all time. 

He said that he wouldn't be trailing the incompetent Clinton by 275 delegates if the delegates themselves were socialists and math challenged, and if "maw paw people would come out and vote" [for him]. 

"I mean, that's just a fact," the socialist said. "That's a sad reality of American society; and that's what we have to transform."

"We have one--as you know--one of the lowest voter turnouts of any major country on Earth. We have done a good job bringing young people in. I think we have done--had some success with lower income people. But in America today--the last election in 2014, 80 percent of poor people did not vote."

And Bernie knows about poor people. Back as a young man living for a while on a commune in Vermont, he lost his job and then his first wife to divorce. Unemployed, a failed carpenter, and overall, a failed hippie, Bernie knew what it meant to be paw.

Eventually, he turned to writing pornography. He (you should forgive the expression) sucked at that too.

If we only give him a chance at the presidency, I am completely confident his record will not be tarnished.


Tweet

Islam: the religion of pieces

I was checking out one of my favorite websites, Jihad Watch, and skimmed through the titles of some of the stories they are covering. The posts about the Islamic State were, as usual, the most barbaric, but there were several others that caught my eye.

Islamic State Beheads 8 Shi'ites, calls them "impure infidels."

You see, if you aren't a Sunni Muslim, and if you are but do not follow Islam the same way the Islamic State dudes do, then you're considered an infidel. The term "infidel" covers every human being on earth who does not practice Islam the same way ISIS practices it.

Islamic State in Nigeria beheads 23 in campaign to scare people from voting.

That seems to work for some people in Nigeria, but not all voters. I have to give those who vote in spite of this threat, a lot of credit and respect.

Islamic State in Illinois planned another Fort Hood.

So here we have two Muslims who once again plan to wreak workplace violence on innocent Americans. Why are we not surprised?

Wives of Islamic State: "When one husband gets martyred, it's like a celebration."

As funny as "Kill the Juice"

One husband? Islam only allows women to have one husband, but one husband can have as many as four wives. It's a man's world, Inshallah.

UK: Father of girl who joined ISIS was at rally boasting of Muslim conquest of USA.

He didn't mean anything by that--maybe like Iran saying "Death to America" every morning, this guy meant it in the nicest possible way.

Philippine President: "Give Muslims self-rule or count body bags."

Yes, be appeasers like Winston Churchill discussed. That is, feed the alligator hoping that it will eat you last. This practice of appeasement is exactly what the Islamists want us to do but in the long run, they're going to do what alligators do.

Finally, this last article made me chuckle, and I don't often do that when discussing Islam and what it has done to the world. UK: New Islam Museum hopes to offset image created by Islamic jihadists.

You can't make this stuff up.

Tweet