Pakistan crowd accuses man of blasphemy, burn him alive

Photo: Jihad Watch

I recently posted a story about a Sri Lanken man in Pakistan who was being held by police for burning a Quran, the Muslim "Holy Book" and how the crowd wanted to burn him alive for blasphemy. The crowd chanted: “Gustakh-e-nabi ki ek hi saza, sar tan se juda sar tan se juda” which means “The only punishment for one who insults the prophet, the head separated from the body, the head separated from the body.”

Lovely.

Well in spite of Pakistani police protection, the Sri Lankan foreign export manager of Rajco factory was taken by the crowd and burned. I will not show it here, but you can find it on Jihad Watch if your sense of morbid curiosity forces you to see this horrible event.

Robert Spencer, the founder of Jihad Watch and Islam expert explains that this should not be considered an example of "extremism." He says that "Islam mandates death for blasphemy.  Death is prescribed for those who mention 'something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam' (‘Umdat al-Salik, o11.10)." 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

We need to be realistic on how we view 'the religion of peace,' as George W. Bush called it after the orthodox Muslims among them peacefully destroyed the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in 2001.

Spencer goes on to discuss more about killing those who blasphemy against Islam. Abu Afak, who was over 100 years old and poetess Asma bint Marwan are examples he uses. Afak was killed in his sleep on Muhammad's wishes. 

And the prophet of Islam after being insulted by Marwan asked, "Will no one rid me of this daughter of Marwan?” She was nursing her baby at the time, but Umayr ibn Adi went to her house while she slept by her children, murdered her and the nursing baby as too. Muhammad commended him: “You have done a great service to Allah and His Messenger, Umayr!” (Ibn Ishaq, 674-676)

Tweet

Iran: Dad beheads his 13-year-old daughter in honor killing

Non-Politically Correct Fact: Muslims commit 91 percent of honor killings worldwide. If this fact was to be posted on social media, it would probably be taken down, but it still remains a fact.

Non-PC Fact 2: The Palestinian Authority gives pardons or suspended sentences for honor murders. 

The fact is, honor killings are generally an accepted part of the culture in many Middle East countries in spite of the fact that there are laws against these horrible acts. Al-Jazeera stated that “Islamists and conservatives said the laws violated religious traditions and would destroy families and values.” By 'conservatives,' they are, of course, referring to religious conservatives, not Republicans.

Islamic law states that "retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right," but Sharia law also states "not subject to retaliation" is "a father or mother [or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring." [Reliance of the Traveller 01.1-2.] 

So, if you kill your own child or have a grandparent do it, Islam is okay with that--there are no legal penalties under Islamic [Sharia] law. Therefore, until this law is confronted regarding honor killings, women will suffer the consequences.

In this case, a 13-year-old Iranian child, Romina Ashrafi, the daughter of the murderer, suffered the ultimate punishment. She was beheaded by her father while she was asleep in bed in her family home in Hovigh, Talesh, as reported by the Daily Mail. [H/T Jihad Watch]

Romina planned to elope with a 35-year-old man and initially ran away from home after her father expressed outrage over her plans to get married. Bothe Romina's family and the man's contacted authorities which led to security forces to  conduct a hunt for them. 

They were caught and the child was sent home, in spite of her telling authorities that she would be in danger there. But the laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran require she be returned to her parents where they could do with her whatever they wanted.

So while Romina slept, her father entered her room with a sickle, and chopped off her head. Still holding the bloody murder weapon, he then turned himself in to the police and confessed the honor killing, losing all chances of becoming Iran's "Father of the Year."

District governor Kazem Razmi said the girl’s father is being held in custody and an investigation into the case is underway. 

The father doesn't need to fret, however, as he will not face the death penalty. He was the victim's guardian and under Islamic Penal Code, he is exempt from "retaliation in kind," or as the locals call it, "qisas."

Sharia law says that only ‘blood owners’ – immediate family members – are allowed to demand execution for the murder of a relative. This suggests that Romina's mom is also fine with the beheading of their daughter.

Most honor killings go unpunished since families tend not to demand the death sentence for another family member--that would be cruel. According to a Tehran police official, honor killings may account for around 20 percent of Iran's murders.

What is wrong with this picture?

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

Aung San Suu Kyi under pressure as humanitarian crisis continues

The foreign minister of Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, flew to Myanmar for emergency talks on Sunday as the Muslim Rohingya humanitarian crisis continues.

The visit is to pressure Aung San Suu Kyi, the 1st State Counselor of Myanmar, into action over the situation in her country and the "innocent" Rohingyan Muslims and their treatment at the hands of the nation's Buddhists.

The catalyst of the visit came from pressure from hypocrites such as Malala Yousafzai, the youngest recipient of the leftist Nobel Peace Prize. She called out Aung San Suu Kyi over her silence and said she should condemn the "tragic and shameful treatment" of Myanmar's Rohingya people.

Malala won the award for being shot in the head by the Taliban, and for making stupid comments such as: Muhammad never advised his followers "to go around killing people," according to a post in  Jihad Watch.

But if Barack Obama can win the Nobel Peace Prize for having done nothing, Al Gore for being factually wrong about everything he utters, and Malala for simply going to school and being shot in the head, the award loses its credibility.

The 20-year-old Malala proudly boasted that "Over the last several years, I have repeatedly condemned this tragic and shameful treatment. I am still waiting for my fellow Nobel Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi to do the same," the self-proclaimed Muslim maven wrote. "The world is waiting and the Rohingya Muslims are waiting."

She reminds me of the youngest child in the family who finally gets married and now tells her older siblings how to live their lives.

The Rohingya, a Muslim minority in predominantly Buddhist Myanmar, also known as Burma, consider them Bangladeshi. But neighboring Bangladesh say they're Burmese, effectively leaving the Rohingya stateless and among the most persecuted people on earth.

Violent clashes in Myanmar have killed hundreds of Rohingya and a mass exodus has seen over 73,000 flee across the border since August 25th, according to a recent UN report.

In Myanmar's Rakhine State in the north, another 30,000 are trapped in the hills without basic supplies of food, water or medicine.

So it stands to reason that the Rohingya Muslims are the only victims in this tragedy, right?

Wrong.

The Buddhists of Myanmar have also been victimized by the Rohingya Muslims for years, particularly in townships where young girls have been raped, robbed and murdered by Muslim gangs.

In a blog known as "The Muslim Issue" the author shows us the other side of the proverbial coin. 

The post was written May 8, 2013 and is called: "Recap: The 'innocent' Rohingya Muslims in Burma and Their Rape and Grisly Murder of Buddhists."

Although the post is obviously biased toward the Buddhists, it's difficult to argue that they have a case to be made as to the roots of the violence being borne on the shoulders of the Muslims.

For example, it asserts that "The emir of Qatar has sent over 3,500 terrorists to Burma to murder, rape and slaughter more Burmese Buddhists--while Obama, the EU and The Human Rights Watch demand that Burma should allow these brutal Muslims to continue without the Buddhist being permitted to fight back."

It also discussed how a young Buddhist girl was robbed, raped and viciously murdered and when the three culprits were brought in by police, Muslims in nearby towns rioted and destroyed property.

This anti-Buddhist situation apparently had been going on years before this was posted and there are many references to previous violence made against the Buddhists by Rohingya Muslims.

Malala is calling for the revoking of Aung San Suu Kyi's Nobel Peace Prize Award. Apparently the young Malala is an expert on peace, in spite of her pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel sentiments, and her mistaken belief that Muhammed didn't call for violence.

But even if the Peace Prize is taken from the Myanmar leader, she still has plenty of awards for her shelf, such as the Rafto Prize, Sakharov Prize, Jawaharial Nehru Award, International Simon Bolivar Prize, Olof Palme Prize, Bhagwan Mahavir World Peace, and Congressional Gold Medal.

All Malala has is the Nobel Peace Prize and a head wound that may still need some looking after--she obviously isn't thinking straight.



Tweet

CNN fires Reza Aslan after vulgar anti-Trump tweets

(Photo: AP)

After a torturous week of trying to decide whether to cut ties with the Hindu-hating, anti-Semitic "Believer" host, Reza Aslan, CNN decided 'yes, we'd better do it or lose even more irate viewers' of their leftist network.

The Communist News Network parted ways with Aslan (aka Assland) after the pseudo-religious "scholar" (LOL) came under fire for a string of vulgar, heated tweets he made about President Trump.

"CNN has decided to not move forward with production on the acquired series 'Believer with Reza Aslan' (season two)," a CNN representative explained to Fox News. "We wish Reza and his production team all the best" [and a hearty Allahu Akbar].

An Aslan rep didn't return a request for comment by Fox News.

Specifically, Aslan responded to Trump's June 3rd remarks regarding the terrorist attacks in London calling Trump an "embarrassment to America and a stain on the presidency" and a "piece of sh*t."

Aslan also came under fire for representing the Hindu religion in a negative way--eating human brains to imply that's what they do. Generally speaking, Islam hates Hindus because they aren't even considered a "religion of the book" meaning the Bible, as are the Jews and Christians.

If anyone knows what it feels like to be a piece of sh*t, it's Aslan, although he was wrong this time.

If you want to learn more about this phony "religious scholar" you should go to jihadwatch.org and search his name. Robert Spencer will give you a lot to think about.


Tweet

Controversial Keith Ellison hopes to run the DNC

I have faith in the intelligence of the American people (maybe not so much faith in the intelligence of liberals). That's why I believe the GOP should hope Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) becomes the next chairman of the DNC. 

Normal people would vote Republican.

Anyone with analytical powers or plain common sense would have a totally changed view of the Democratic Party if Ellison is appointed, and voters, as described above, would have to think twice before pledging allegiance to a party that would have such a leader.

But again, we're talking about liberals--they don't seem to like America as it is now and always want to change her.

Ellison is the first Muslim to be elected to U.S. Congress. That in and of itself is not an issue, but beside a history of not paying his parking tickets (something that is unlawful) Ellison is a strong supporter of Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam. 

When Ellison attended the University of Minnesota Law School, he wrote several articles supporting the anti-Semitic, anti-white Farrakhan. You can see more on Farrakhan here, here  and here.

But Farrakhan doesn't like white people either. 

Ellison had also called for the impeachment of Dick Chaney and compared George W. Bush to Adolf Hitler, so of course Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren love the guy as does Chuck Schumer (D. NY) and Harry Reid (D. Nev.).

Another website,  Jihad Watch, has a lot to say about Ellison and his relationship to Islam.

Ellison back Bernie Sanders in the election. "Bernie sparked the beginning of a revolution y'all," he said at the DNC in Philadelphia. "Together we call for climate justice, racial justice, wage justice."

Nobody is quite sure what 'climate justice' means, and racial justice is Ellison's idea that cops need to stop returning fire. Wage justice is the belief that your money needs to be divided up, but not the money of the elite.

Sanders has also backed Ellison and said in a fundraising email that an Ellison-led Democratic Party will stand up to Wall Schtreet greed and corporate America. 

Socialists hate big corporations because they're big.

Ellison is expected to announce his bid Monday. On Sunday, he hinted he would run and said the party needs to focus on middle- and working-class Americans and less on donors.


Tweet

The convenience of Islamophobia

If Islam was a person rather than a religion, it would be an abusive husband who beats his wife and blames her for his behavior. "Look what you made me do," the abusive husband would say, always playing the victim, as the wife bleeds all over the floor.

If the mainstream media could be characterized as a person, it would be the gullible kid down the block who does the bidding of the other kids. "Hey Lester, go fetch me a can of cedar wood smoke." And Lester would do his best to accomodate.

The UK mainstream media was doing what it does best, shilling for Islam as it republished the Metropolitan Police press release discussing the "rise" in "Islamophobic" attacks in London last year. Of course, they did not release any details about the so-called Islamophobic incidents, nor will they discuss an even greater problem related to Islam, which is the even greater rise in anti-Semitic attacks in Londonstahn over the course of the past year.

The BBC reported: "Islamophobic crime in London up by 70%." 

The Telegraph reports the rise of Islamophobia against Muslim women where they are spat upon and covered in feces. 

The Metropolitan Police (aka "London Dhimmie Patrol") had a press release entitled: "Met's response to rise in Islamophobic hate crime in London."

Of course, nobody in the UK media reported on the FACT that while "Islamophobia" a word that is an oxymoron, apparently rose 70.7% (478 cases reported last year with 816 reported this year), that anti-Semitic attacks was up 93.4% (from 258 to 499). And somehow, I believe the anti-Semitic attacks were a hell of a lot more legitimate than many or most of the "Islamophobic" attacks.

In total, there were 13,007 hate crimes reported last year, making both the anti-Semitic and "Islamophobic" attacks minute in comparison to the total. 

But there are only 300,000 Jews in the UK compared to about 3,000,000 Muslims making the anti-Semitic attacks more significant by comparison, yet the anti-Semitism goes unreported. 

To use the term "Islamophobia" is a mistake at its very core. A phobia is an irrational fear that has no bearing in reality. Fear of orthodox Islam is a healthy fear that is self-preserving. There is an interesting article in Jihad Watch regarding the French Prime Minister's refusal to use this term.

In another article by Robert Spencer in Jihad Watch entitled: Did the Muslim Brotherhood invern the term "Islamophobia"? he delves into the history of the term and how the Muslim Brotherhood "ran with it" today.

ISIS is not an anomaly of Islam, it is Islam in its purest form. And Islam teaches Muslims to hate Jews and Christians--it's the first Sura, Al Fatiha and it's recited about 17 times a day on average by every religious Muslim. It refers to "those who have deserved wrath" [who are the Jews] and "the strayers" [who are the Christians].

Enjoy, my infidel friends:

Surah Al-Fatiha

Anonymous

1. BISMIL LAAHIR RAHMAANIR RAHEEM.
In the name of GOD, Most Gracious, Most Merciful

2. AL HAMDU LILLAHI RABBIL `AALAMEEN.
Praise be to GOD, Lord of the universe

3. AR RAHMAANIR RAHEEM.
Most Gracious, Most Merciful

4. MAALIKI YAWMID DEEN.
Master of the Day of Judgment

5. EYYAAKA NA`BUDU, WA EYYAAKA NASTA`EEN.
You alone we worship; You alone we ask for help

6. EH'DENAS SIRAATAL MUSTAQEEM.
Guide us in the right path

7. SIRAATAL LAZINA AN`AMTA `ALAYHIM; GHAYRIL
MAGHDOOBI `ALAYHIM WALADDAALEEN.
the path of those whom You blessed; not of those who have deserved wrath, nor of the strayers

Tweet

There's Something About Donald

In an illuminating article by Robert Spencer in Jihad Watch, Donald Trump is depicted as an outspoken, somewhat buffoonish person, who has gone after politicians such as John McCain and Lindsey Graham. In fact, Spencer even admits how it's often hard to go after the Trumpster for his attacks on these career politicians, in spite of Donald's "clumsy savaging" of McCain.

On the other hand, McCain showed similarly poor judgment "when he claimed Michele Bachmann's entirely reasonable questions about Huma Abedin's Muslim Brotherhood ties manifested an "ignorance" that "defame[d]" the spirit of the nation."

As Spencer describe it, "So when it comes to John McCain and Donald Trump, it's blowhard versus boor. But that doesn't excuse Trump."

There is no doubt, as Spencer attests to, that Americans are tired of "mealy-mouthed career politicians talking platitudes. They want a real person as president . . . "

So while it's just great that Trump is willing to fling buffalo chips and attack those who caved to immigration issues and followed the herd on the left, the billionaire businessman is not willing to defend freedom of speech when it might jeopardize his businesses in Dubai.

Let's get specific.

The American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI)/Jihad Watch Muhammad Art Exhibit and Cartoon Contest took place in Garland, Texas. The purpose of this event was for Americans to express their First Amendment right to draw a Muhammad cartoon and possibly win a prize. The event was put on by Pamela Geller, a New York City blogger who is also associated with Robert Spencer and has made many appearances with him in the past to discuss issues regarding Islamo-Fascist problems with the religion of peace. 

You might recall how 2 Muslim terrorists tried to enter the event and kill as many participants as possible, but were summarily killed by a single cop with a handgun.

Trump had this to say about Pamela Geller:

"I watched Pam earlier, and it really looks like she's just taunting everybody. What is she doing drawing Muhammad? I mean it's disgusting. Isn't there something else they could be doing? Drawing Muhammad? They can't do something else? They have to be in the middle of Texas doing something on Muhammad and insulting everybody? What is she doing? Why is she doing it? It's probably very risky for her--I don't know, maybe she likes risks. But what the hell is she doing?"

If Trump has to ask these questions, what does that say about his understanding of the Constitution?

Salman Rushdie said of this tendency we witnessed that it is a case where "Fear is being disguised as respect." And he is absolutely right.

Rushdie had a death fatwa issued by an imam of the religion of peace for writing the novel, Satanic Verses, and had gone into hiding for years. He added that if he were threatened for insulting Islam today that "these people would not come to my defence and would use the same arguments against me by accusing me of insulting an ethnic and cultural minority."



But my personal favorite quote is from Dinesh D'Souza.







Tweet

Islam: the religion of pieces

I was checking out one of my favorite websites, Jihad Watch, and skimmed through the titles of some of the stories they are covering. The posts about the Islamic State were, as usual, the most barbaric, but there were several others that caught my eye.

Islamic State Beheads 8 Shi'ites, calls them "impure infidels."

You see, if you aren't a Sunni Muslim, and if you are but do not follow Islam the same way the Islamic State dudes do, then you're considered an infidel. The term "infidel" covers every human being on earth who does not practice Islam the same way ISIS practices it.

Islamic State in Nigeria beheads 23 in campaign to scare people from voting.

That seems to work for some people in Nigeria, but not all voters. I have to give those who vote in spite of this threat, a lot of credit and respect.

Islamic State in Illinois planned another Fort Hood.

So here we have two Muslims who once again plan to wreak workplace violence on innocent Americans. Why are we not surprised?

Wives of Islamic State: "When one husband gets martyred, it's like a celebration."

As funny as "Kill the Juice"

One husband? Islam only allows women to have one husband, but one husband can have as many as four wives. It's a man's world, Inshallah.

UK: Father of girl who joined ISIS was at rally boasting of Muslim conquest of USA.

He didn't mean anything by that--maybe like Iran saying "Death to America" every morning, this guy meant it in the nicest possible way.

Philippine President: "Give Muslims self-rule or count body bags."

Yes, be appeasers like Winston Churchill discussed. That is, feed the alligator hoping that it will eat you last. This practice of appeasement is exactly what the Islamists want us to do but in the long run, they're going to do what alligators do.

Finally, this last article made me chuckle, and I don't often do that when discussing Islam and what it has done to the world. UK: New Islam Museum hopes to offset image created by Islamic jihadists.

You can't make this stuff up.

Tweet

Obama's Love Affair with the Muslim Brotherhood

In an article by Jihad Watch it states that the Obama administration refuses to declare the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization. 

Big surprise.

Obama finally responded to a petition that began over a year ago stating "We have not seen credible evidence that the Muslim Brotherhood has renounced its decades-long commitment to non-violence."

Well, duh, of course not. This is totally in line with the Islamic tactic called taqiyya where it is perfectly acceptable, and expected that Muslims lie in order to further the advancement of Islam. So while the leaders of the MB smile and stick out an oily hand in friendship, their goals are the same as ISIS, Hamas, and jihadist organizations throughout the world. Just because the MB doesn't make YouTube beheading videos does not mean they are not in line with the vermin who do.


Think about this: if today was September 12, 2001 instead of December 2, 2014, and Obama was president (G_d forbid), there would be no doubt that Hussein Obama would declare them terrorists. That's because everything, everything Obama does is for political gain, not for national or patriotic reasons.

As a nation, we've done very well in our history. We are without doubt, the best nation on earth, in my opinion. But electing this racially dividing, Alinsky-loving, Islam-sympathizing, Israeli-hating, socialist to our highest office has been our biggest mistake.

And I'm being kind in my description of this arrogant narcissist who thinks he's a damn monarch of the United States.

Tweet

You Can't Insult Islam

Raif Badawi, co-founder of the "Saudi Arabian Liberals" website is accused of writing anti-Islam thoughts on his blog. He was found to be guilty and is to serve 10 years in prison, and oh yeah, I almost forgot, 1000 lashes. I hope the "person" meting out the punishment uses a wet noodle because it doesn't take even 100 lashes to kill a person if they wanted to do that.

According to Muslim "scholars," you can insult Islam by: being born Jewish, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, Jain, atheist, gay, or lesbian. Cooking bacon in an area where a Muslim can smell the flavorful aroma is insulting and you will be asked to stop cooking it--if you refuse, you will either be beaten or taken to court by CAIR.

Wake the Flock Up, Christians and Jews

I think we all need our heads examined. We continue to use political correctness to dictate our response to a very clear and present danger, Tom Clancy aside, about the "religion  of peace," Islam. At least some of us, Megyn Kelly of Fox News included, are seeing the situation for what it is, and are voicing concerns over the growing cancer that is orthodox Islam. Megyn recently interviewed Ibrahim Hooper, CAIR's scumbag PR jihadist and takiyya aficionado. When Hooper exhales, he's lying. But CAIR often has its way with our laws and one day I suspect it will be dictating Sharia law to us all, if we continue along the same path.

An Important Call to Alms

The Robert Spencer website, Jihad Watch, is under cyber attack by various Islamic groups. The attackers are using massive logins to shut the site down, and in order to keep this from happening, a seriously expensive firewall must be built to protect the website.

If you don't know who Robert Spencer is, and you're concerned about the terrorism taking place all over the world, you ought to go to www.JihadWatch.org  Mr. Spencer is one of the world's foremost authorities of Islam and has written extensively on the subject, especially from the viewpoint of the infidel. Imams fear him because they cannot argue against the facts he presents in debates, so they attack him ad hominem instead. 

So what I'm suggesting is that after reading this, you go to Jihad Watch and consider making a small donation to help fund the needed firewall. These cyber jihadists are subjecting the site to over a million hits an hour, and hoping to take it down and shut Spencer up. 

I have never asked any of my readers to donate to anything (although, I must admit, I have suggested they check out my advertisers by clicking onto their ads) but I truly believe it's worth a perusal to consider it. But before you do, I wouldn't stop you from clicking on one of my ads or more, I get a pittance if you do, but then go over to Jihad Watch and consider donating. They're giving one of Robert Spencer's latest books for a $25 donation. The book alone is worth it at this time in American history where knowing who and what we're dealing with is essential to our future.

Thanks for reading this.

A New York reporter, is captured by Islamist terrorists who demand the release of three Gitmo prisoners in exchange for him. If the president refuses their demands, they plan to behead the reporter and videotape it for the Internet. But the United States doesn’t give in to terrorist’s demands and he has 24 hours before he is to be executed. The clock is ticking . . .                                         

Jihad Joe Soft Cover

click here for ebook version  

My other blog New York Canuck

Tweet

Exploring the Religion of Peace in the World

Sometimes you look at what's going on in the world and you marvel at how the United States can walk on eggshells when it comes to Islam and its terror components. It amazes me how sharia law is defended by liberals who don't see a conflict with it and the Constitution. It further amazes me how our president can back the Muslim Brotherhood without fear of reprisal from the public.

If Iran Attacked by Sea

Iranian Warship

The Iranian warships are closing in. They are near the shores of the United States and we have a president who sleeps with a nightlight. What will he do?

Well, for one thing, he doesn't need to apologize to Iran or any Muslim nation about the problems people in the West has with Islam--he already apologized to them when he first took office. Obama has done nothing to show his leadership or the courage to use American force if he needed to show strength to Iran. Obama, in fact, has done nothing an actual Muslim would not have done as president, so it doesn't matter what religion he claims to be. So what do you think he will do if Iran floats a warship off the shores of, say, Coney Island?

I think he will actually wet himself if he had to confront a real war on home soil or American waters. I think he will react too slowly if Iran was serious about throwing the first punch and we will be hurt by them--I'm just not sure that they would do it--I think they're just testing the level of fear Obama has over the possibility of confrontation.


Our military, G-d bless them, are basically saying that if that little rat-faced shit tries to scare us with his warships, they will have the company of the United States Navy. I can almost imagine us daring them to make a move--flinch, you jihadist bastards, and we will show you what we are made of, and who we are. Iran's navy cannot measure up to ours, and is rather feeble by our standards--kind of like Michael Moore but smaller.  But we have to wait for our "Commander in Chief" to make the call if they make the first move and I worry about that.  

Go For It Mahmoud

As Sean Hannity suggested, he thinks the US and Israel should get together and get rid of the Iranian nuclear capabilities--he fell short of actually stating he favors a pre-emptive strike, but how else could one do this? I have to agree with this because Iran has made it perfectly clear what their goals are, and they don't see us in their future. Maybe we should accomodating them by changing their future.  Just saying.

If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe.  It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists.  He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.

click here for softcover Jihad Joe                     

click here for ebook version

     
tweet

Is Anderson Cooper Keeping Himself Honest?

When you're a news organization, chances are pretty good that you have liberal views. But if you're a reporter for a liberal news station, you are not excused from reporting honestly, giving all the facts that both support as well as refute your claims, and letting the public decide. Hey, you're CNN--what do you have to lose anyway, your 455 viewers?

Just another day on the job

Recently, CNN aired a piece of shamfully bad reporting on "Keeping Them Honest." I cannot imagine who is keeping Anderson "they punched me ten times in the face right in Tahrir Square--I'm such a pussy" Cooper honest. but he sure isn't doing it. I am referring to the smear-job they did on Walid Shoebat, an Islamic jihadist who saw the error of his ways and became a Christian who now helps people in Islamic countries obtain freedom. 

Before discussing Walid Shoebat, I would like to mention an article in Jihad Watch, run by Robert Spencer.  He discussed how Kerry Rubin, an Anderson Cooper assistant, approached him, ostensibly to ask if he would be interested in providing information for their show "Keeping Them Honest." Rubin said she wanted Robert to talk about issues regarding jihad and Islam.  Spencer, knowing Cooper's leftist leanings, was suspicious and terse with the questions he was asked by her, especially when she began asking about his recent work with the military, how it's funded, etc.  When Rubin saw that Spencer wasn't about to go for the bait, she said that she had another call that she must take and would get back to him--she was lying--something the left does all the time, but as long as they aren't hypocrites about it, there's no problem for them. She never called him back.

His softer side

In response to what occurred on CNN with Walid Shoebat, a friend of Spencer's, he printed a letter written by Joel Richardson, another friend and coworker of Walid Shoebat, entitled: "CNN's Anderson Cooper is a fraud, Walid Shoebat is not." The letter discussed the CNN ambushing.  In a report by Drew Griffin, a CNN crack reporter (you can define 'crack' more ways than one) tried to ambush Walid Shoebat on three points.

First, he claimed that Walid did not use his Foundation's funds to actually rescue Christians from Islamic oppression. Somehow he made it up, he is lying, and that's that. The reason they say this has to be so is because Walid refused to reveal how much money was involved--when this clown asked that question, he answered, "That is none of your business." Just because Walid was correct by telling him it was none of his business, and knowing that CNN would use anything he said to ambush him, he rufused to reveal the funding, which was simply good thinking. Of course, CNN tried to imply that he misused the money from his Foundation because he wouldn't tell Griffin the details.

The second point was that Walid lied when he said that he spent time in the Mascubia prison. They was certain he was lying because a fourth cousin of Walid's told them it was a lie. Had they vetted this fourth cousin, they would have discovered he was also related to two well-known terrorists and had good reasons to discredit him. Had they even looked deeper into the situation, they would have found that an even closer relative, a guy who was trying to discredit him three years prior to this, admitted he had been in this prison because at the time the video was made, this wasn't the "damning" issue they were discussing. 

Lastly, they said he never was involved with bombing the Bethlehem branch of Bank Leumi because they called the bank and this supposedly didn't happen. When it was learned that the Bethlehem branch no longer exists, Cooper and Griffin said they spoke with the Tel Aviv branch. Of course this branch had no records of the Bethlehem branch, so that's nonsense too. Finally, in order not to look like a the team from Dumb and Dumber, they said they spoke to the Israeli Police station in Bethlehem. Unfortunately, there is no Israeli Police station in Bethlehem.  Also, if they bothered to go to the same information given by the closer relative who actually had an axe to grind (literally), three years prior to this report, they would have heard him mention the fact that Walid was known to place a few "parcels behind the bank" from time-to-time. But CNN has its own agenda, and truth isn't on the list.

I have recently learned that CNN plans to do a "full expose" of "Islamophobia," a term made up by Islamists to shame the west into believing that we are racists and are phobic against Islam. It isn't a phobia if it isn't irrational. Americans are very sensitive to being labelled a 'racist.' Nobody wants to be thought of that way, which is why Islamists invented this term, and why if a non-Muslim calls you a racist, he or she is probably a liberal.

So anyway, here we have another mainstream media story that is full of lies, poor research, or worse, pure deception, and a television network that too many Americans believe is telling the truth. This is even true about the Daily Show, where most young liberals get their "news." After all, if it's on TV as news, it must be true.  You need to see this video about CNN and their lies--it's 8 minutes long and well-worth the time investment. If you're concerned, like any good American would be, you might just tune out CNN, or at least learn to question what is being told as truth. The mainstream media is in trouble, and it's all their fault. People are not as gullible as they believe, and they are getting their news from the blogs, online media, and hopefully they are looking at both sides of the issues. Americans are smarter than they give us credit for--Soros and his socialist colleagues think they have us all fooled, but that only makes them the real fools. America will prevail.


Comments are always appreciated.
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Tweet