Not the Babylon Bee: UNRWA nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

If they called it the Nobel Pieces Prize it would have made more sense nominating UNRWA for the Nobel Peace Prize. But like the time Yasser Arafat's group Black September massacred 6 Israeli coaches, 5 Israeli athletes and a German police officer at the Munich Olympics in 1972 and later went on to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, many of us have stopped taking this award seriously.

There is clear evidence showing that UNRWA workers not only support the terrorist groups Hamas, Hezbollah and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, but that they actually took part in the October 7, 2023 massacre of over 1,200 Israelis, mostly civilians.

Anyway, in Oslo, Norway a politician bragged on Thursday that he nominated UNRWA for the Nobel Peace Prize. Labour MP [aren't they always the ones] Asmund Aukrust told the Dagbladet newspaper that he nominated UNRWA “for its long-term work to provide vital support to Palestine and the region in general,” and for dealing with the "Jewish problem," if you get my drift.

“This work has been crucial for over 70 years, and even more vital in the last three months,” said the Jew hating politician who is vice-chairman of Norway’s parliament’s foreign affairs committee.

More than a dozen countries have suspended giving UNRWA money for bread and bullets, including the USA, Germany, Britain, and Sweden over proof that 12 staff members of the organization directly participated in the slaughters, rapes, and myriad atrocities that killed over 1,200 people, and kidnapped 253 others, some, if not many of whom have died.

Israel refused to do nothing. They launched an all-out offensive aimed at destroying Hamas and the return of the hostages.

According to the Hamas-run health ministry, at least 26,900 Palestinians have been killed in the Israeli offensive, an unverified figure that does not differentiate between terror operatives and noncombatants. But the Israel Defense Forces says the military has killed some 10,000 fighters in Gaza, in addition to some 1,000 terrorists killed in Israel on October 7.

It's a good start.

Of course, just being nominated for the Peace Prize does not represent recognition by the Nobel Committee, which receives hundreds of nominations every year. But if they can give it to Arafat, they could give it to these clowns.

I have hope that they won't.

Tweet

Pres. Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize, and the left has a cow

Former President Donald J. Trump has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize under strange circumstances: he actually did something to earn one as opposed to former President Barack Hussein Obama who got one before he did anything to earn one. Sixty-one percent of Americans agreed that he didn't do anything to deserve it, and so did Obama. In fact, he was waging wars in Iraq and Afghanistan at the time, while Trump's time in office [the first time] saw no new wars.

The nomination for Trump comes from Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-NY) who cited Trump's "historic" Abraham Accords treaty as the reason for the nomination.

The Abraham Accords was signed at the Trump White House on September 15, 2020 having to do with agreements whereby both the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain recognized Israel's sovereignty. This, in turn, allowed for full diplomatic relations with Israel.

Trump's achievement proved foreign policy experts and international organizations wrong, Tenney told Fox News Digital. He was the leader in facilitating the first real peace agreements in the Middle East in almost 3 decades in spite of the "experts" saying he had no chance of getting that agreement without a resolution in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

The "experts" were wrong . . . as usual.

As Tenney continued to laud the former president, she also took a well-deserved shot at the Nobel Peace Prize Committee for ignoring Trump's achievement.

President Trump's efforts in creating the Abraham Accords were unprecedented and continue to go unrecognized by the Nobel Peace Prize Committee, underscoring the need for his nomination today.

This wasn't Trump's first Nobel nomination — it was actually his fourth.

In 2020, Christian Tybring-Gjedde, a member of the Norwegian Parliament applauded Trump's efforts in "resolving protracted conflicts worldwide," and he first nominated the then-president.

Several months later, Laura Huhtasaari, a member of the conservative Swedish Finns Party, wrote to the Nobel Committee to nominate Trump for the 2021 prize "in recognition of his endeavors to end the era of endless wars, construct peace by encouraging conflicting parties for dialogue and negotiations, as well as underpin internal cohesion and stability of his country."

Again in September 2020, he was nominated by a group of Australian lawmakers.

What he has done with the Trump Doctrine is that he has decided he would no longer have America involved in endless wars, wars which achieve nothing but the killing of thousands of young Americans and enormous debts imposed on America. He's reducing America's tendency to get involved in any and every war.

All four times, Trump was denied. Is anyone surprised?

Leftists are going to go ballistic if he actually gets the Prize. But will he take the fifth?

I doubt it--no matter what he does, the left hates him so much they will never approve of anything for him short of jail at the very least, and a firing squad, composed of the Capitol Hill "Squad" to pull the triggers.

Tweet

Charlatan News Network attacks Trump's triumph

The Charlatan News Network (CNN) cannot allow any of President Trump's victories seem like a victory lest they appear to be an actual news network.

On Wednesday, Trump greeted the three Americans who were freed from imprisonment in North Korea in what can only be described as an historic moment deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize nomination, while CNN attacked his motives--something they didn't do when the Obama administration gave away the farm to Iran in the nuclear deal sham.

The fake news this time suggested by CNN was that Trump made the event happen because he wanted to use it as a campaign ad. 

Seriously. The idiots at CNN actually said that.

"Well, this is Donald Trump as a ... TV moment for him," former Bill "I Didn't Have Sex With That Woman" Clinton advisor Philip Yun said. "If nothing else, he knows how to get publicity, how to bleed a lot of drama."

Yun wasn't done.

"How soon will it be before we see images these turned around and, you know, put out on social media by the President or some kind of, you know, a campaign message?" John Vause asked CNN Senior White House Correspondent Jeff Zeleny.

"I expect before the sun rises you will see something like that without question," Zeleny responded.

Perhaps Obama could have used all of his accomplishments for campaign ads, like the Solyndra deal in which he gave a solar panel company taxpayer money to sell solar panels below cost, and then when they went bankrupt and sold off, he repaid his rich investors illegally before paying the taxpayers. 

Or the time Obama's Attorney General (aka "Wingman") Eric Holder, put guns in the hands of the Mexican drug cartel that got Brian Terry killed and also poor Kate Steinle.

Or what about the Iran deal that overwhelmingly favored Iran over the US and our allies.

But because CNN hates Trump and loves Obama, the truth never emerged but conspiracy theories abound. The pseudo-journalists at CNN keep pushing the "theory" that President Trump was using the North Korean detainees as a way to deflect from "the Robert Mueller investigation into Russia, the criminal investigation of his own personal attorney, the Stormy Daniels . . ." yadda, yadda.

CNN International "journalist" Will Ripley said that Trump was "exploiting" the freed Americans. 

First of all, I don't blame him--when you're the president, you exploit your accomplishment. When you're Donald Trump, you exploit them as the biggest and best accomplishments in the history of the universe.

If it was Barack Obama who freed the American detainees, honestly, would CNN do anything less than sing his praises, kiss his ring, and have little red hearts popping over their heads?

Hypocrisy goes both ways, but it goes significantly more to the left. Think about it--when the press makes a mistake, it is never to the benefit of Trump, it's always a lie to his detriment. 

Always.

Tweet

Trump's Nobel Peace Prize nomination a fake

President Donald Trump's nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize was a fake, according to the head of the Norwegian Nobel Institute, much like former President Barack Obama's Nobel Peace Prize was actually a joke, like that of Yassar Arafat.

"We have good reason to believe that a nomination we received concerning Trump has been falsified," Institute Director Olav Njolstad told the AFP news agency. "We never give out our prized prizes  to conservative politicians or anyone who actually has demonstrated their role in a peaceful change in the world.

According to Alfred Nobel's will, the Peace Prize is to be given to individuals and institutions that "have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."


And that's why former President Barack Hussein Obama won it and then gave a 36-minute speech about it.

 The nominations for the prize took place just 11 days after he actually took office, so they had more than an entire week to evaluate his fitness for the prize.

Another so-called "great" American president who won the Nobel Peace Prize was Woodrow Wilson. 

Wilson, known for his racist legacy, was not the only other "great" president to win the prize. We cannot forget the inimitable President Jimmy Carter.

Carter won the prize in 2002 "for his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development."

In an article about how Carter spreads anti-Israel venom like cancer, you can see just how much he deserved the Nobel Peace Prize.

So by Olav Njolstad's saying, "We have good reason to believe that a nomination we received concerning Trump has been falsified," that should make Trump feel good about himself because when the Nobel Prize committee doesn't think you're doing a good job, you're doing a good job.

The unidentified American who nominated President Trump reportedly cited his "ideology of peace by force" for their submission. I would modify that slightly to say his "stance on refusing to allow other nations to push us around or threaten us, which, thereby, maintains the peace," is more apropos because Trump doesn't really have an ideology.


Tweet

Aung San Suu Kyi under pressure as humanitarian crisis continues

The foreign minister of Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, flew to Myanmar for emergency talks on Sunday as the Muslim Rohingya humanitarian crisis continues.

The visit is to pressure Aung San Suu Kyi, the 1st State Counselor of Myanmar, into action over the situation in her country and the "innocent" Rohingyan Muslims and their treatment at the hands of the nation's Buddhists.

The catalyst of the visit came from pressure from hypocrites such as Malala Yousafzai, the youngest recipient of the leftist Nobel Peace Prize. She called out Aung San Suu Kyi over her silence and said she should condemn the "tragic and shameful treatment" of Myanmar's Rohingya people.

Malala won the award for being shot in the head by the Taliban, and for making stupid comments such as: Muhammad never advised his followers "to go around killing people," according to a post in  Jihad Watch.

But if Barack Obama can win the Nobel Peace Prize for having done nothing, Al Gore for being factually wrong about everything he utters, and Malala for simply going to school and being shot in the head, the award loses its credibility.

The 20-year-old Malala proudly boasted that "Over the last several years, I have repeatedly condemned this tragic and shameful treatment. I am still waiting for my fellow Nobel Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi to do the same," the self-proclaimed Muslim maven wrote. "The world is waiting and the Rohingya Muslims are waiting."

She reminds me of the youngest child in the family who finally gets married and now tells her older siblings how to live their lives.

The Rohingya, a Muslim minority in predominantly Buddhist Myanmar, also known as Burma, consider them Bangladeshi. But neighboring Bangladesh say they're Burmese, effectively leaving the Rohingya stateless and among the most persecuted people on earth.

Violent clashes in Myanmar have killed hundreds of Rohingya and a mass exodus has seen over 73,000 flee across the border since August 25th, according to a recent UN report.

In Myanmar's Rakhine State in the north, another 30,000 are trapped in the hills without basic supplies of food, water or medicine.

So it stands to reason that the Rohingya Muslims are the only victims in this tragedy, right?

Wrong.

The Buddhists of Myanmar have also been victimized by the Rohingya Muslims for years, particularly in townships where young girls have been raped, robbed and murdered by Muslim gangs.

In a blog known as "The Muslim Issue" the author shows us the other side of the proverbial coin. 

The post was written May 8, 2013 and is called: "Recap: The 'innocent' Rohingya Muslims in Burma and Their Rape and Grisly Murder of Buddhists."

Although the post is obviously biased toward the Buddhists, it's difficult to argue that they have a case to be made as to the roots of the violence being borne on the shoulders of the Muslims.

For example, it asserts that "The emir of Qatar has sent over 3,500 terrorists to Burma to murder, rape and slaughter more Burmese Buddhists--while Obama, the EU and The Human Rights Watch demand that Burma should allow these brutal Muslims to continue without the Buddhist being permitted to fight back."

It also discussed how a young Buddhist girl was robbed, raped and viciously murdered and when the three culprits were brought in by police, Muslims in nearby towns rioted and destroyed property.

This anti-Buddhist situation apparently had been going on years before this was posted and there are many references to previous violence made against the Buddhists by Rohingya Muslims.

Malala is calling for the revoking of Aung San Suu Kyi's Nobel Peace Prize Award. Apparently the young Malala is an expert on peace, in spite of her pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel sentiments, and her mistaken belief that Muhammed didn't call for violence.

But even if the Peace Prize is taken from the Myanmar leader, she still has plenty of awards for her shelf, such as the Rafto Prize, Sakharov Prize, Jawaharial Nehru Award, International Simon Bolivar Prize, Olof Palme Prize, Bhagwan Mahavir World Peace, and Congressional Gold Medal.

All Malala has is the Nobel Peace Prize and a head wound that may still need some looking after--she obviously isn't thinking straight.



Tweet

Gore has something to sell you

Climate change expert poser, Nobel Peace Prize oxymoron winner and 'gay divorcee'  Al Gore is now making the idiotic claim that the climate 'battle' is just like the fight against slavery and apartheid. What a schmuck.

By the way, have you noticed how many Nobel Peace Prize winners did absolutely nothing to promote peace?

It was bad enough that Gore made millions off a movie  about global warming, using fake statistics and general BS to con the public, and that he sold his crappy TV station to Al Jazeera making millions more, he is now likening the "battle" over climate change (which was once called 'global warming' but that wasn't working out too well for the left) to humanity's greatest struggles such as the battles against slavery, apartheid and nuclear proliferation.

He told this to a gaggle of gullible Australians (disclaimer: not all Australians are gullible) Thursday in another BS speech that people actually paid him to deliver.

In a July 13 speech to the EcoCity World Summit in Melbourne . . . EcoCity World Summit in Melbourne, Gore, the world's first carbon billionaire, said that combating global warming was "in the tradition of all the great moral causes that have improved the circumstances of humanity throughout our history."

He said this after deplaning from his private jet and, like Leonardo DiCaprio and Barack Obama, is one of the biggest carbon footprint polluters on the planet.

In a bowel moving speech Gore said, "The abolition of slavery, woman's suffrage and women's rights, the civil rights movement and the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa, the movement to stop the toxic phase of nuclear arms race and more recently the gay rights movement," leaving no identity political group out that might enrich him even more.

This isn't the first time Gore has fantasized an analogy between climate change and civil rights. Perhaps he's trying to make up for the fact that his father, Albert Gore Sr., voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The Washington Times has an interesting piece on Gore's hypocrisy using the Civil Rights movement as if he owned it.

And of course, the main reason Gore is touring Australia with his climate change charade is because he's having a documentary "An Inconvenient Sequel," the follow-up of his first fake documentary that has been disproven.

Anyone who spends money on that propaganda is being laughed at by Gore all the way to the bank.

Al Gore pondering global warming

Let me be clear: there is evidence of global warming but the United States is already making great efforts to lessen human influence. However, without other nations like China, India and Russia doing their part, the difference is negligible. And moreover, it isn't understood exactly how much human influence is to blame, nor whether humans can reverse the effects.

On a positive note: we have always been able to master the earth's climate with technology. The time it would take for global warming to become a threat, rather than the current lifesaver it is for poor countries, is in the distant future.

For the time being, global warming is a good thing.


Tweet

Obama awards himself a Defense Dept. medal

With a crowd of dozens, likely ordered to be on hand or face a court martial, President Lame Duck Obama awarded himself a Defense Department medal on Wednesday, to go along with his Nobel Peace Prize.

Like his Nobel Peace Prize, this medal, the Department of Defense Medal for Distinguished Public Service, is as ironic as a tax and spend Democrat failing to pay his own taxes--it's ironic, but not uncommon. 

His appointee and personal peon, Ash Carter, pinned the medal on his muscle-hungry chest. 

Watching the 'ceremony' brought to mind the AYSO soccer league where all the 5-year-olds get participation trophies because nobody loses .  .  .  therefore, nobody wins.

The ceremony was at Joint Base Myers-Henderson where mops stood safely on standby behind closed doors to dispense with the barf, should it become necessary.



Tweet

Racist Bob Dylan won't meet with Obama

Folk rock and whatever he wants to sing singer Bob Dylan (aka Robert Zimmerman--no relation to George Zimmerman) to his credit, skipped the phony Nobel Prize in Literature award ceremony, and now he skipped the President Barack Obama "I know lots of important entertainers" ceremony to honor him along with other Nobel Prize winners. 

President Obama, you may recall, received the Nobel Peace Prize very soon after being sworn in as POTUS. Since that time, he has droned the crap out some terrorists while inviting others for tea and crumpets at the White House. 

White House spokes robot Josh Notso Earnest says "unfortunately, for those of you wondering, Bob Dylan will not be at the White House today, so everybody can relax."

And while Earnest said that Bob didn't give a reason, some speculate that, as an ardent Trump supporter who wants to make America great again, the singer would rather not pretend to enjoy the company of such a rich phony.

Democrats will now have the opportunity to label Mr. Dylan a racist.

Perhaps the reason he refused to see Obama is blowin' in the wind.



Tweet

Nobel Oxymoron Peace Prize

Who best to represent the Palestinian Authority for the "coveted" Nobel Peace (LOL) Prize than a convicted anti-Semitic Jew-murderer who is now serving not one, not two, but FIVE life sentences? It's an elegant oxymoron, but it isn't funny like, say, "jumbo shrimp" or "military intelligence."

Palestinian leaders offered Marwan Barghouti as their choice for the Nobel. He is the founder of al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades and is known as "the Palestinian Mandela." Let's not forget that Mandela was considered a great man because he was willing to use violence for his cause, not in spite of it.

Barghouti was convicted in 2004 of five counts of murder. He was behind the Tel Aviv seafood market attack in which three civilians were killed. This scumcrumpet, while serving time in prison actually toyed with the idea of running for president--and he has all the immoral qualifications, but he would have a hard job of delegating his duties from behind bars.

The Nobel Peace Prize is the perfect gift to go on Barghouti's wish list. After all, if  Barack Obama (who obviously is pro-Palestine over Israel as indicated by his desire to have Israel return to the 1967 suicidal borders), Jimmy Carter (who is totally anti-Zionist), Yassar Arafat (PLO leader who killed Jews at the Munich Olympic Games), Malala Yousafzal (who gave her prize money to the Palestinian Authority), then why not Barghouti? 

Hell, even Al Gore scored the prize.

The West Bank's Fatah equates Barghouti's arrest as an "abduction," and suggest the terrorist should be allowed to go free and do his will with diplomatic immunity. 

Perhaps they should even allow him to have his own parking space by the Knesset. 

"[Barghouti's] candidacy is essentially a call to recognize the legitimacy of the prisoners' struggle . . . and also a response to the claims and Israeli terms that do not recognize the legitimacy of their struggle, and treat them as terrorists and criminals," said Issa Karake, head of the PLO's Commission of Prisoner Affairs.

Itamar Marcus, of Palestinian Media Watch countered, "The Palestinian Authority has claimed for years that they have a right under international law, confirmed by a UN resolution, to kill Israeli civilians in all places and at all times. Accordingly, those Palestinians who have killed Israelis are said to have done something positive and heroic. Palestinian murderers of Israeli civilians are presented as heroes and role models." 

Yes, even children's cartoon on Palestinian TV depict cute little animated characters as hating the evil Jews,  depicting them as demons who drink the blood of Palestinian children to make their holiday matzoh. 

The victims of Barghouti's hatred for the Jewish people were simply guilty of being Jewish or thought to be Jewish. That is the real reason Muslims kill Jews. 

I've said it many times before that anti-Semitism is virulent in the Koran. You really should read it and decide for yourself.

But giving Barghouti a Nobel Peace Prize, or even considering the possibility, should tell you a lot about the prize itself and how it has lost all meaning for what it was originally intended.


Tweet

State Department Considering a $50 Billion "Signing Bonus" for Iran

"I'll be more flexible once you sign"

The Iranian economy rebounded out of recession and had an estimated growth of 3% last year, better than the Obama administration's 2.4% growth for the same year. Nevertheless, if John "Lurch" Kerry wants to seal a nuclear deal with the terrorist nation by June 30th, a deal that will delay them from acquiring a nuclear bomb several weeks later than they would without a deal, he might have to offer them a "signing bonus." The amount under consideration is $50 billion, not what you think of as "chump change," and enough moolah to put into their defense spending budget.

The Obama obamination has developed a plan to unfreeze tens of billions of Iranian funds if they just sign the damn thing. That's all Obama wants, and all that Kerry wants, and both for personal reasons, it seems.

Obama wants a better legacy than his current cluster-fudge has produced and Kerry wants to win a Nobel Peace Prize so he can pick up chicks. Oh wait, that's Bill Clinton. Kerry just wants the Prize so he can be amongst the world's greatest peacemakers like Yassar Arafat, Barack Obama, and Al Gore.

This "signing bonus,"  was first reported by The Wall Street Journal saying that it could be the largest cash infusion to a terror-backing regime in recent memory. But since when has Obama been shy about supporting our enemies and kicking our allies?

The $50 billion "signing bonus" would be in addition to the over $11 billion in unfrozen assets Iran already has received under an interim nuclear accord from 2013. 

It feels like Obama is the kid in the schoolyard who pays off the bullies with his lunch money, but the money was never his in the first place. But State Department Spokesbimbo, Marie Harf, poo-pooed reporters and in true Alinsky fashion, blamed them for getting all "spun up" on the issue.

When asked whether Iran could get the $50 billion "on day one after signing" or verbally agreeing to a nuclear deal, the arrogant Harf told the press that she would "look into it," implying that like Obama, she hadn't yet learned of the deal from the media.

These are the people who are supposed to be working for us, the people. But it certainly feels like they have it all backwards. Well, kind of like Obama's alliances and behavior to Christians and Jews versus Muslims and its Brotherhood organization.

Tweet

Pakistan Taliban Love-Hate Relationship

Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) aka Pakistani Taliban, was founded in 2007 and is composed of staunch followers of the Qur'an and the teachings of Islam, a religion founded on war. 

The Pakistani Taliban has killed thousands of Pakistanis, was responsible for trying to kill Malala Yousafzau, the Nobel Peace Prize winner (who followed in the footsteps of Yassar Arafat by donating $50 thousand of her winnings to the Palestine cause) and for the latest attack in Peshawar where 141 people were brutally murdered, most of them children.

Religious writing on the wall

TTP says the attack was revenge for the military's offensive against them in the Pakistani tribal areas along the Afghan border. No school children were involved in those offensives.

Pakistan sees the TTP as the "bad" Taliban as opposed to the Taliban approved of by the Pakistani government, or the "good" Taliban. Of course, when you examine both groups, the main difference is where they shop for their camel meat and goat's milk. Both Taliban groups serve up the same extremist ideology and follow the jihadist philosophy of the Qur'an (aka Koran) and seek to rid the world of everyone who believes differently from them, including Shi'ite Muslims who believe in following a different warrior prophet than Mohammed and the crew.

But it was the TTP that was targeted by the Pakistani military and for that, children were killed because that's the way these barbarians do things.

The "good" Taliban are seen by the idiots in Pakistan as that Taliba who doesn't attack Pakistan but goes after "enemy" states like India or Afghanistan when it goes against Pakistan. So it's a hate-love situation for Pakistan and the hate was seen yesterday from the slaughter.

We saw how Pakistan has provided safe haven for the Afghan Taliban and for Osama bin Laden. The dirtbag was a block away from a major military area, protected by Pakistan, when he was killed by Barack Obama in camo.

How are we to feel about this latest attack? To say they had it coming to them is unfair to the children and teachers killed at the school. But to say they should have seen it coming, isn't far off the mark at all.

When you sleep with wolves, they might just take your head off. Don't blame the West for the carnage.


Tweet

Malala Donates Her "Peace Prize" Earnings to Hamas

Yassar Arafat won it in 1994. He masterminded the attack by his PLO group, "Black September" at the Munich Olympics that killed eleven Israeli athletes. But Israel's terrorists are the Palestinian's freedom fighters, as well as those on the left whose knowledge of the facts about Israel and Hamas, equal the knowledge of town barbers at a time in history when they were performing surgery. Arafat amassed a fortune to the tune of about $1.3 billion by 2002, while the Palestinian people lived like paupers.

Mohamed ELBaradei won it in 2005. (He was also runner-up in the Rep. Henry Waxman Lookalike Contest). ElBaradei downplayed Iran's nuclear program and also claimed Iraq's nuclear program did not restart before 2003, a slight stretching of the facts. He also wanted to open the Gaza Strip--Egyptian border saying that Israel is the biggest threat to the Middle East because of their nuclear arsenal. He called for international criminal investigation of the Bush administration officials for their roles in planning the war in Iraq. His strongest desire is for the complete and utter destruction of Israel and all the Jews.

Al Gore won it in 2007 for making up facts that are today still in question. "The science is settled" is probably the most unscientific thing a person can say about any topic having to do with physical science. Gore is nothing more than a charlatan in an expensive suit.

Barack Hussein Obama won it in 2009, mostly for talking while being the first black president in the United States of America. We invited him to the table and he brought a bottle of smoke. He has been the most un-American president our nation has ever had, and makes Jimmy Carter look like the Albert Einstein of politics, who, by the way, won it in 2002.

The Nobel Peace Prize.

Now the prize has been won by Malala Yousafzai, a 16 year old who was shot in the head in October of 2012 by the Taliban for her stand on girls getting an education.

Malala has donated $50000 of the money to U.N. schools in Gaza, schools where they teach such interesting courses as Anti-Semitism 1.1; Vest Design for One-Time Use; and Tunnel Architecture 101.

While the Pakistani Taliban called her a "soldier against Islamic society," (unlike Nadal Hassan who was a soldier for Islam) I believe that by donating the money, she is "helping the cause in the spread of hatred," and that the Taliban got it wrong.

Perhaps Malala is misguided. Perhaps she knows where the money is going to be spent. Her own home country condemns her as a Western agent. Muhammad Umar Khorasani, spokes-moron for Tahreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, cha-cha-cha, the terror organization headed by Mullah Fazullah, told the press that the 17 year old won the prize for "promoting Western culture, not education."

Tell that to Israel, Mullah Fazullah.


Tweet

U.S. Retreats from Libya, Harf Explains Why

The U.S. evacuated its diplomats from Libya on Saturday and sent them to nearby Tunisia. They were escorted by U.S. military after fighting in Tripoli intensified and security circled the drain. Rival militias engaged in battle and the State Department finally made the right move. In fact, for the first time in Obama's presidency, I am proud of our State Department.

Big-haired Marie Harf, State Department coed and spokesperson said, "Due to the ongoing violence resulting from clashes between Libyan militias in the immediate vicinity of the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, we have temporarily relocated all of our personnel out of Libya." 

This withdrawal marks the first time the Obama administration has acted on behalf of the safety of American personnel and is likely to fetch our president his second Nobel Peace Prize (if I know anything about leftist organizations like the Nobel committee). Of course, it was learned that the Pentagon had been begging the State Department to leave the Libyan post weeks ago, but President Obama had other pressing priorities, such as fund raising and golf, before he was ready to spring into decisive action.

"Securing our facilities and ensuring the safety of our personnel are top department priorities, and we did not make this decision lightly," Harf huffed. "Security has to come first," she added without also saying, "this time." 

Gee, if "ensuring the safety of our personnel are top department priorities," why did it take so long? It was explained as a "no brainer," but I didn't know they meant it literally.

Tweet