Gazans still call for genocide of the Jews while celebrating "peace deal"

One cannot help but marvel at the brazenness of it all: the chants rising like a muezzin's call from the throats of those who fancy themselves peacemakers, yet who summon forth the ghosts of ancient conquests. This is a declaration of perpetual war, a reminder that peace, in their lexicon, is but a pause between battles. 

And Donald Trump, in spite of earning a Nobel Peace Prize, will, of course, wave it away like so much desert sand.

As Robert Spencer's indispensable The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS lays bare with unflinching clarity, the Islamic tradition cherishes a tale that ought to chill the blood of any who still cling to illusions of tolerance. It recounts how Muhammad himself marshaled a Muslim force against the Khaybar oasis, home to Jews whom he had already banished from Medina, no provocation, no casus belli, merely the inexorable logic of expansion. 

One of his followers later recalled the scene with a vividness that borders on the cinematic: "When the apostle raided a people he waited until the morning. If he heard a call to prayer he held back; if he did not hear it he attacked. We came to Khaybar by night, and the apostle passed the night there; and when morning came he did not hear the call to prayer, so he rode and we rode with him….We met the workers of Khaybar coming out in the morning with their spades and baskets. When they saw the apostle and the army they cried, 'Muhammad with his force,' and turned tail and fled. The apostle said, 'Allah Akbar! Khaybar is destroyed. When we arrive in a people's square it is a bad morning for those who have been warned.'"

The invaders wasted no time in their grim harvest. Bursting into Khaybar, they hunted down the inhabitants' riches with the zeal of tax collectors from hell. A Jewish chieftain, Kinana bin al-Rabi, guardian, by tribal trust, of the Banu Nadir's buried treasure, was dragged before Muhammad. Kinana, under duress, feigned ignorance, but the Prophet was not one for games: "Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?" Kinana, cornered, admitted he knew full well the stakes.

A portion of the hoard surfaced, but the rest eluded them. Muhammad's response was as pragmatic as it was pitiless: "Torture him until you extract what he has." A fire was kindled upon Kinana's chest (imagine the agony, the acrid smoke rising like a sacrificial offering) but still he held his tongue. Only as death's shadow lengthened did a blade end his torment, severing head from body. His wife, Safiyya bint Huyayy, fell to the victors as spoils of war; Muhammad, ever the opportunist, selected her for his own harem and contrived a "wedding" that very night, detaining the caravan's departure from Khaybar just long enough to seal the union in the conqueror's tent. Mercy, if one can call it that, flickered briefly:

Muhammad permitted the Khaybar Jews to slink into exile, burdened only with what their arms could bear. Yet he decreed they abandon all gold and silver—a tidy confiscation dressed as concession. He had planned a total expulsion, but the farmers among them, pleading for their soil, bartered half their annual yield for the right to till it. The Prophet assented, with a codicil as cold as a scimitar's edge: "I will allow you to continue here, so long as we would desire." And the warning: "If we wish to expel you we will expel you." Their existence henceforth hung by the thread of Muslim whim, rights reduced to revocable favors. When, inevitably, hidden treasures came to light—smuggled away by the desperate—he retaliated without remorse, enslaving the tribe's women and claiming the land of the guilty. A hadith preserves the epilogue in stark terms: “the Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives."

So when today's jihadists cry "Khaybar!" from the streets or the scaffolds, they are not merely rhyming with history; they are resurrecting it, invoking that dawn raid which extinguished the last embers of Jewish life in Arabia. To them, Khaybar is no tragedy but a triumph: the annihilation of the Jews, their wealth rifled and their futures chained, all in the name of a faith that brooks no rivals. 

It is a cry, in short, for the ummah's eternal vendetta, a blueprint for our own uneasy age, should we dare to heed it.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Tweet

The 'Palestinian Flag' is more or less a rag

The so called Palestinian flag, like the Palestinians, is an invention. In the case of the flag it was invented by the KGB and Yasir Arafat in the 1960s. Its purpose is to be a weapon against Israel. [H/T Front Page Magazine, Robert Spencer.]

Before it became the flag of Palestine, it served as the emblem for the Hashemite Kingdom of Hejaz, founded in 1916 and later incorporated into Saudi Arabia by 1925. In 1924, this flag also represented the Sharifian Caliphate, which encompassed similar regions in what is now Western Saudi Arabia, persisting until 1931.

The Hejaz is in Arabia — not “Palestine.” The designer of the flag was not a Palestinian, as there were no Palestinians as such in those days, but an English Colonel named Mark Sykes.

The flag we call the Palestinian flag today wasn't really the flag of Palestine back in the day. Around 134 CE, the Romans kicked out the Jews from their land and started calling it Palestine. They chose this name because it was the name of an old group of people called the Philistines, who were enemies of the Israelites in the Bible and were no longer around. But when the Romans said Palestine, they were just talking about an area, not a country with its own people or flag.

We don't find evidence of this group or their flag in historical records. There was never a sovereign Palestinian state, and the Arabs living in the region did not use this flag. A 1939 world atlas does display a flag for Palestine, but it refers to the area under British Mandate. The British administered this territory not as a typical colony, but specifically to establish a national home for Jews in their ancestral land. This fact challenges the narratives often pushed by today's historical revisionists. Notably, the 1939 flag of Mandatory Palestine prominently features a Star of David.

The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) officially adopted the current Palestinian flag in 1964, the same year it renamed itself from the Palestinian National Liberation Movement to the Palestinian Liberation Organization. This change was made to reflect its commitment to liberating a newly defined Palestinian nationality. Prior to the 1960s, the concept of a distinct Palestinian nationality did not exist; it was created to reframe what was previously known as the Arab-Israeli conflict. Before this shift, Israel was seen as a small, beleaguered state surrounded by a vast Arab world. However, with the emergence of the Palestinian identity, the narrative flipped, portraying Palestinians as the small, oppressed group against a dominant Israel.

In summary, the Palestine flag is as fake as the notion that Hamas are freedom fighters.

Tweet

A Shawarma joint opened in Jordan: you'll never believe the name

Would you like to supersize that order?

Go to Amman Jordon and if you're Jewish, leave your Kippah [Jewish skull cap, aka yarmulke] at home to avoid offending the townsfolk. Check out the Middle East cuisine--it's really tasty and not very expensive. 

You might also want to check out a new restaurant in town. They call it "October 7." 

[H/T Robert Spencer, Red State]

If you've been awake since that date, you must be familiar with it. That's the day the Hamasshole jihadis invaded Israel by air, land and sea, and went on a bloody spree in which they mass murdered Israelis, raped, mutilated, burned and beheaded Jews, including women, children and even babies. The attack left 1,200 Israelis dead. They also took about 240 hostages who they gang raped, hacked off breasts and threw them around like a ball, and slaughtered a number of them for sport.

So if you decide not to go to Amman, Jew, Christian or otherwise, I don't blame you.

It's ironic that we are telling Israel to ceasefire; to stop the killing of "innocent" civilians, some who killed hostages that were placed with them, and 98 percent of whom are virulently anti-Semitic because it's part of their religion and how they've been taught. It's ironic to think that the United States bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the Second World War and killed thousands upon thousands of civilians outright, while others died of radiation poisoning later on. [The chart below depicts the numbers.]

And in the same bloody war, the U.S. along with Britain, bombed the crap out of Dresden, the Capital of the German state of Saxony. We flew four raids between February 13 and 15, 1945 and killed as many as 25,000 people. 

Like Israel, we warned the Japanese about the impending bombing, but unlike the Israelis, we didn't drop "roof-knock bombs" to show them we meant business. And now the United States along with the UN anti-Zionist members, are pointing fingers at the most moral armed forces to ever exist. 

How freaking ironic.

But the real irony is the fact that a recent survey showed that only 5% of Arabs surveyed rejected what Hamas did on October 7.  Most Muslims in the Middle East, along with many US and UK college students, are all in for the Hamassholes.

It's hard to fathom how the Biden administration and much of the West has the audacity to point fingers at Israel, a nation in an existential battle to exist, after what they did to gain peace in the world, if only temporary.

Imagine if the US or UK opened a restaurant and called it the Hiroshima or Nagasaki. Sure the bombings of both cities ended the war rather quickly, but imagine if we celebrated their deaths like Hamas, Hezbollah and the overwhelmingly large proportion of Arabs in the Middle East.

It's only the Jews who do wrong. Jews whom Allah transformed into apes and pigs for their disobedience according to the Qur'an (2:63-66; 5:59-60; 7:166). 

Tweet

Pakistan crowd accuses man of blasphemy, burn him alive

Photo: Jihad Watch

I recently posted a story about a Sri Lanken man in Pakistan who was being held by police for burning a Quran, the Muslim "Holy Book" and how the crowd wanted to burn him alive for blasphemy. The crowd chanted: “Gustakh-e-nabi ki ek hi saza, sar tan se juda sar tan se juda” which means “The only punishment for one who insults the prophet, the head separated from the body, the head separated from the body.”

Lovely.

Well in spite of Pakistani police protection, the Sri Lankan foreign export manager of Rajco factory was taken by the crowd and burned. I will not show it here, but you can find it on Jihad Watch if your sense of morbid curiosity forces you to see this horrible event.

Robert Spencer, the founder of Jihad Watch and Islam expert explains that this should not be considered an example of "extremism." He says that "Islam mandates death for blasphemy.  Death is prescribed for those who mention 'something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam' (‘Umdat al-Salik, o11.10)." 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

We need to be realistic on how we view 'the religion of peace,' as George W. Bush called it after the orthodox Muslims among them peacefully destroyed the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in 2001.

Spencer goes on to discuss more about killing those who blasphemy against Islam. Abu Afak, who was over 100 years old and poetess Asma bint Marwan are examples he uses. Afak was killed in his sleep on Muhammad's wishes. 

And the prophet of Islam after being insulted by Marwan asked, "Will no one rid me of this daughter of Marwan?” She was nursing her baby at the time, but Umayr ibn Adi went to her house while she slept by her children, murdered her and the nursing baby as too. Muhammad commended him: “You have done a great service to Allah and His Messenger, Umayr!” (Ibn Ishaq, 674-676)

Tweet

Anti Semitic Malaysia loses its World Para Swimming Championship

Sometimes there is good news in this fancy, frilly, ya gotta have a gimmick world, [a saying that came from an old commercial on TV whose source escapes me].

On Sunday, the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) said it was stripping Malaysia of the right to host the 2019 World Para Swimming Championships, after the crappy southeast Asian Muslim country refused to host Israeli athletes.

The event was scheduled to be held in the city of Kuching between July 29 and August 4. Screw them--it isn't going to happen.

The IPC Governing Board made the decision to pull the event from Malaysia “after the Home Ministry of Malaysia failed to provide the necessary guarantees that Israeli Para swimmers could participate, free from discrimination, and safely in the Championships,” the IPC said in a statement.

IPC President Andrew Parsons said: “All World Championships must be open to all eligible athletes and nations to compete safely and free from discrimination. When a host country excludes athletes from a particular nation, for political reasons, then we have absolutely no alternative but to look for a new Championships host.”

Parsons means well but he got it slightly wrong. Malaysia didn't exclude the Israeli athletes for "political reasons," they excluded them for Islamic religious reasons.

In his book, The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran, by Robert Spencer, he discusses in detail the anti-Semitic sentiments held since Islam was invented. Spencer writes:

An Egyptian imam, Muhammad Hussein Ya'quub summed up the theological argument for Islamic anti-Semitism in a January 2009 televised sermon:

"If the Jews left Palestine to us, would we start loving them? Of course not. We will never love them. Absolutely not. The Jews are infidels--not because I say so, and not because they are killing Muslims, but because Allah said: 'The Jews say that Uzair is the son of Allah, and the Christians say that Christ is the son of Allah.' These are the words from their mouths. They imitate the sayings of the disbelievers before. May Allah fight them. How deluded they are. [9:30] It is Allah who said that they are infidels."

So let's be honest about Malaysia--they are only doing what they believe they must in accordance with the religion of peace [LOL].

“The Paralympic Movement has, and always will be, motivated by a desire to drive inclusion, not exclusion. Regardless of the countries involved in this matter, the IPC would take the same decision again if it was to face a similar situation involving different countries,” Parsons said, and I commend him for it.

The American Jewish Committee (AJC) praised the decision as “a great victory for the Paralympic spirit.”

The AJC had submitted a petition to the IPC Governing Board earlier calling on it to condemn Malaysia’s ban on Israeli athletes and to relocate the event to a country willing to host athletes from Israel. The IPC may have to look at a non-Islamic country to find a venue, or at least an Islamic country afraid of Iran and who wants Israel's protection. Saudi Arabia springs to mind, but even there, I doubt they'd have the games because they don't even allow people with Israeli passports or other passports with Israeli stamps on them to enter Arabia.

In early January, Malaysia’s government decided that no Israelis would be allowed to enter the country for any event. They were afraid to lose to one of those, you know, Jews.

“Even if we have already committed to hosting an event, they will not be allowed,” Foreign Minister Saifuddin ["I like puddin'"] Abdullah said on Jan. 16.

The IPC says that when it signed a contract with the Paralympic Council of Malaysia to host the swimming championships it was assured that all athletes and countries would be able to participate. Malaysia used the lie known as taqiyya, or lying for Islamic advantage.

Islam is probably the only "religion" that recommends lying for the advancement of their perpetual religious jihad.

“Since then, there has been a change of political leadership and the new Malaysian government has different ideas. Politics and sport are never a good mix and we are disappointed that Israeli athletes would not have been allowed to compete in Malaysia,” the IPC said in its statement.

The IPC is currently looking for a new host nation. I suggest they go for Israel, just to stick it to them.


I hope that 2019 will be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Dems got it backwards on democracy

The survival of our democracy depends on the adherence to the Bill of Rights. Democracy never depends on banning any right guaranteed by the finest document ever put to paper.

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) is calling for more tech companies to ban more sites that he and his party disagrees with, like Facebook, YouTube, Apple, Pinterest, and Spotify have done to Infowars. Murphy says the survival of American democracy depends on it.

Murphy has it a** backwards: the survival of our democracy depends on our ability to express ourselves and defend ourselves against the tyranny of government, just like the tyranny of censoring free speech erodes democracy.

If it's Alex Jones today, who will it be tomorrow? Ben Shapiro?Sean Hannity? Robert Spencer? Pamela Geller?

Even the speech of Milo Yiannopoulos, which is as detestable as Alex Jones', should not be banned because the more these idiots talk, the more normal people can see their lies.

But Chris Murphy and his ilk are more dangerous than both Jones and Yiannopoulos.

"Infowars is the tip of a giant iceberg of hate and lies that uses sites like Facebook and YouTube to tear our nation apart," Murphy said. "These companies must do more than take down one website. The survival of our democracy depends on it," he tweeted Monday.

Murphy never explains just who determines what are the lies. He also doesn't understand that free speech is not the speech we want to hear, but the speech we don't want to hear. It's a person's right to say whatever he wants to say and our right to not listen, to walk away, to disagree and use more speech to debate.

Speech that calls for violence or puts lives at risk is already illegal.

And no, Alex, we are not 'all Alex Jones'. Just because someone defends your First Amendment right to free speech, doesn't mean they like you or believe a word you say. You are a loathsome individual who deserves not to be taken seriously, but that's the only restriction that should be placed on your words.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.

Tweet

POTUS to host Ramadan dinner--priceless

President Donald Trump will be hosting an iftar dinner at the people's house next week in recognition of Ramadan, the Muslim holy month.

In Robert Spencer's [not to be confused with white supremacist RIchard Spencer] new book, "The History of Jihad," he writes about Barack Obama's June 4, 2009 Cairo speech to the Islamic world:

"Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance. We see it in the history of Andalusia and Cordoba during the Inquisition...

 Spencer goes on to say:

Tolerant al-Andalus: as the conquest of Spain was being completed in the year 718, the Umayyad caliph Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz sent out a message to the governors of the various Islamic provinces:

O you who believe! The non-Muslims are nothing but dirt. Allah has created them to be partisans of Satan; most treacherous in regard to all they do; whose whole endeavor in this nether life is useless, though they themselves imagine that they are doing fine work. Upon them rests the curse of Allah, of the Angels and of man collectively.

But if we convert to Islam, all the dirt is gone.

Anyway, President Trump has departed from last year's new tradition of not hosting a Ramadan dinner, known as iftar, the traditional post-sundown meal.

The White House official declined to provide a list of attendees.

The White House faced criticism last year from several terrorist organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), to name a few, for neglecting to embrace the dhimmie tradition held by former presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Hussein Obama.

Based on their track record of global terrorist activities, Trump has a somewhat negative relationship with the Muslim community. In his campaign, he called for a "total and complete" ban on all Muslims entering the United States, which seemed to go overboard in the erring of caution. As POTUS, he restricted the entry of citizens from several terrorist-spawning countries from entering the United States.

In a statement issued in May, marking the start of Ramadan, Trump said, "Ramadan reminds us of the richness Muslims add to the religious tapestry of American life."

He gave no examples of how this is true.

As is the tradition of the White House, all guests will be thoroughly checked for weapons.


Tweet

Reza Aslan potty-mouths Trump: but who is he?

CNN host and Islamist Reza Aslan (aka Greezy Assland) called the President of the United States 'a piece of s**t" after the London attack, and also referred to Mr. Trump as a "man baby."

Aslan doesn't speak that way against Islamic terrorists--only our president who speaks out against Islamic terror is a piece of s**t and an embarrassment as far as he's concerned.

When NBC Nightly News' Brian Williams said the network would not be "relaying the president's retweet" of a Drudge Report tweet that shared the news of the London attack because it was "unconfirmed." (Williams also said that he barely escaped the knife attack with his life.) 

Aslan offered a "translation" of what Williams was saying.

"Translation: the president is a man baby that must be ignored in times of crisis," the Islamist sympathizer wrote.

Aslan hosts CNN's "Believer" and touts himself to be a religious scholar and not a journalist at CNN.

But who really is Reza Aslan?

He calls himself an Islamic scholar but doesn't seem to have a clear understanding of Islam, according to a real Islamic scholar, Robert Spencer.

In "Scholars" Reza Aslan and Mia Bloom Spencer indicates that Aslan is a professor of creative writing at the University of California, Riverside; and Mia Bloom, another self-described "Islamic expert" is a professor of security studies at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell. 

These academic positions hardly qualify either of them to be called scholars of Islam.

Both Aslan and Bloom are "rudely contemptuous of anyone who would dare question their knowledge of Islam, but both have just made the same spectacular error--the kind of error that only someone with no actual knowledge of the relevant material would ever have made." 

They tweeted out a quote from the first caliph, Abu Bakr, that they believe proves the Islamic State is violating Islamic law. But of course, the opposite is true if you actually understand the text.

So what else is there about Aslan that might disturb a Westerner?

For one thing, according to an August 5, 2014 article by Robert Spencer, Aslan comes out strong for Hamas. 

Spencer says that Aslan is a board member of an Iranian lobbying group, National Iranian American Council dedicated to eradicating the Jews, and he even tried to pass off Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a liberal reformer, calling for us to negotiate with him as well as Hamas.

"Aslan ought to know better, but he may not, as he has never shown himself to be very bright. Although he is quite arrogant and supercilious, this foul-mouthed media darling keeps revealing his abysmal ignorance in interview after interview. He continually makes howling errors of fact, including his recent ridiculous claim that the idea of resurrection "simply doesn't exist in Judaism," despite numerous passages to the contrary in the Hebrew Scriptures. He has also referred to "the reincarnation, which Christianity talks about" but later claimed it was a "typo.""

In another instance in which he used the "typo defense" to weasel his way out of it, he claimed the Bible story of Noah was barely four verses long. He soon corrected it to forty.

The Bible story of Noah is 89 verses long.

Spencer then takes him to task for his misuse of English such as using "than" for "then," "clown's" for clowns," and the guy is allegedly a creative writing professor.

Finally, in another article titled Reza Aslan eats human brains but it's unlikely to help, Spencer talks about how the "scholar" featured himself on CNN eating human brain tissue. 

But it's unlikely to help, Spencer says, because of all his errors of fact and Aslan's breathtaking stupidity.

Did you know that Aslan believes Marx and Freud gave birth to the enlightenment?

This is one of the braintrusts of CNN. 

Why do you think I call them "Certainly Not News?"



Tweet

German sailor beheaded by Abu Sayyaf

German sailor Jurgen Gustav Kantner was held hostage by Somali pirates for two months almost ten years ago and he survived. But he was kidnapped again by the Islamic terrorist group known as Abu Sayyaf in the Philippines.

They beheaded him and captured their barbarism on video released Monday after the deadline passed to pay his ransom.

This was the first beheading of a hostage since two Canadians met the same fate in June. Some officials had unreliable information that Kantner was killed because he was sick.

The video shows him in a grassy clearing saying "Now he kill me" just before a masked scumbag beheaded him. Gunmen standing by shout "Allahu Akbar" which means "Our devil is great," or some such thing.

The crap weasels had demanded a $605,000 ransom and still hold 26 hostages. They have made millions from these kidnappings.

Abu Sayyaf claimed they kidnapped Kantner and killed a woman sailing with him off Malaysia's Sabah state. Villagers found the woman dead on a yacht with a German flag off Laparan Island in Sulu province, which is in the southern Philippines.

Kantner and Sabine Merz, his partner, were taken hostage by Somali pirates in 2008--they were later freed. Obviously Kantner had really bad luck to be taken again, but by Muslim extremists who have a sickening blood lust and a penchant to make money off of it.

The Philippine military would only confirm Kantner's death if they could see his remains or some other compelling proof of death. Military spokesman Brig. Gen. Restituto Padilla said he "will not dignify that video by watching it."

"They can shout and claim whatever they want," Padilla began, "but we will not rely on this," adding that efforts to free local hostages held by these scumcrumpets would continue.

In Germany, Foreign Ministry spokesman Martin Schaefer said the video was being examined by their experts to determine its authenticity, and added that if it is authentic, then it's "deeply shocking."

"It makes you question what can lead people to commit such a barbaric crime, but, at the moment, I'm not in a position to say whether the video's authentic," Schaefer said.

So let's question what can lead people to commit such a barbaric crime.

Well one thing we know about Abu Sayyaf is that they are all Muslim militants, so we must ask ourselves whether Islam has anything to do with such barbaric acts.

Let's look at beheading as it relates to their most holy scripture, the Koran.

Sura 8:12 is one sura justifying beheading as is 47:4.

"When your Lord inspired to the angels, "I am with you, so strengthen those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, so strike upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip." (8:12)

"When you meet the unbelievers, strike the necks . . ." (47:4)

There are more verses in the Koran that call for killing of nonbelievers and I would recommend Robert Spencer's website Jihad Watch for further reading.


Tweet

Theresa May: pro-extremists anti-Brexit

British Prime Minister Theresa May spoke in Philadelphia about "the peaceful religion of Islam" and "internationalism."

To her discredit, May banned Robert Spencer, a expert on Islam and its dangers to the Western world, from the country, likening him to a violent terrorist for correctly saying that "[Islam] is a religion and is a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers. . . " 

But she did not ban the steady influx of jihad preachers into the country.

For example, Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri is a preacher of hatred and jihad violence. He was banned from preaching in Pakistan because of his level of violence but the UK Home Office welcomed him with open arms.

More recently, the UK Home Office admitted Shaykh Hamza Sodagar, a Muslim who said "If there's homosexual men, the punishment is one of five things. One--the easiest one maybe--chop their head off, that's the easiest. Second--burn them to death. Third--throw them off a cliff. Fourth--tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth--a combination of the above."

The guy's a real sweetheart if you're straight, though.

These are just two examples of how Theresa May and the UK has allowed themselves to come under siege by Islamic extremists. The UK government recently admitted two jihad preachers who praised the murderer of a person who was opposed to Pakistan's blasphemy laws. One of these scumbuns was praised by none other than the Archbishop of Canterbury while the country banned three bishops from Iraq and Syria where Christians are persecuted.

What's wrong with this picture? 

Does May think that by giving in to jihad extremists and admitting them, while banning those who oppose jihad terror, she will pacify her uncontrollable and booming Muslim population?

Is she crazy enough to believe that if she rids her country of "Islamophobia" that Muslims will no longer respond to their jihad imperative? 

It's obvious that Brexit has been discarded by May. Briton needs to vote her out of office and elect a Prime Minister who will make Britain what it used to be.


Tweet

Iran threatens to end the nuclear deal if US doesn't bow to their demands

The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is celebrating the 37th anniversary of their takeover of our U.S. Embassy in Tehran. In light of that hostage-taking event, which rendered then-President Jimmy Carter impotent, the IRGC is threatening our current impotent president with voiding the nuclear deal if we don't keep up our end of the agreed upon issues. 

A lieutenant commander of the IRGC, Brigadier General Hossein Salami (his friends call him "Cold Cuts") spoke at a commemoration of the hostile Embassy takeover. "The Iranian nation is bound to its nuclear commitments, but this commitment is not a one-way street."

Salami spoke at a huge demonstration in Tehran on Thursday, adding that if the U.S. fails to keep its word regarding the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA, aka nuclear deal) they will be forced to return to "square one" regarding negotiations.

The July 2015 nuclear deal was an agreement between Iran and the West, represented by the P5=1 nations which are Russia, China, the U.S., Britain, France and Germany. Its purpose was to "ensure that Iran's nuclear program will be exclusively peaceful," said the State Department under Vietnam protester and current Secretary of State John Kerry.

Iran, and other Islamic theocracies define "peaceful" as a time when everyone submits to the will of Allah. In the Islamic Dictionary for Infidels, by Robert Spencer (2006) the author writes:

Muslims frequently claim, to obscure the realities of the war against non-Muslims, that "Islam means peace." The word "Islam" does indeed come from the same three-letter Arabic root (s-l-m) as the word "salaam," peace. "Islam," however, means "submission," not peace. "Peace" in Islam equals submission to the will of Allah through ihis divine eternal law, sharia. The absence of sharia is the absence of peace. Bassam Tibi explains: "First, both sides should acknowledge candidly that although they might use identical terms these mean different things to each of them. The word 'peace,' for example, implies to a Muslim the extension of the Dar al-Islam--or 'House of Islam'--to the entire world," explained Tibi. "This is completely different from the Enlightenment concept of eternal peace that dominates Western thought, a concept developed by Emmanuel Kant," an 18th-century philosopher. "Similarly, when Muslims and the Western heirs of the Enlightenment speak of tolerance they have different things in mind. In Islamic terminology, this term impies abiding non-Islamic monotheists, such as Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians, as second-class believers. They are 'dhimmi,' a protected but politically immature minority." According to Tibi, the quest of converting the entire world to Islam is an immutable fixture of the Muslim worldview. Only if this task is accomplished, if the world has become a "Dar al-Islam," will it also be a "Dar a-Salam," or house of peace."

So when Iran says they are pursuing a "peaceful" use of nuclear energy, we can rightfully believe that they have their own definition of 'peace.' 

If Iran can indeed bring "Death to America" and "Death to Israel," then they will have peace. 

Since the nuclear deal was signed Iran pointed fingers at the U.S. but has continued financing and providing material support for global terror. They have also taken several Americans into custody and sentenced them to 10 years in prison in order to get hostage money that the Obama administration is willing to pay to make himself appear less impotent than he actually is.

"Iranians will fight to the last moment for their rights anywhere in the world; a complete return to conditions before JCPOA is a total possibility should the US fail to attach to its commitments in implementing much-vaunted deal," Cold Cuts said in that Farsi way he has of talking.

But they only do so to bring "peace" into the world.



Tweet

DNC ad attacks GOP on term "radical Islam"

Awad quotes Sura 9:5 "Sura of the Sword"

The DNC (evidently standing for Department of Nut-jobs and Communists) has made an ad denouncing the GOP's use of the term 'radical Islam.' A post in mediaite.com "DNC Ad Attacking Republicans for Saying 'Radical Islam' Is Laughably Stupid" discusses the new ad.

The DNC is attempting to convince people, whose intelligence they have no respect for, that to use the term 'radical Islam' is to say that all Muslims are terrorists. This is as laughable as Bill Clinton's "I did not have sex with that woman  .  .  .  Monica Lewinsky."

As pointed out by Robert Spencer, this move by the DNC is an attempt to make the willful ignorance of Islamic jihadist terrorism appear as if it's a virtue. Spencer argues: "The DNC claims that to say 'radical Islam' is to say that all Muslims are terrorists. That is tantamount to claiming that to say 'Italian mafia' is to assert that all Italians are mafiosi."

The DNC used George W. Bush, a president they've hated for his 8 years in office, as "exemplary" in his "denial of the nature of the jihad threat." You might notice Nihad Awad, National Board member of CAIR standing behind Bush nodding his head to Bush's dhimmie statement.

We know that CAIR is a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial. The MB was convicted of funding Islamic radical terrorism. They were not convicted of funding Muslim terrorism, as the DNC would try to convince you.

Derp

Most Americans, 56% of Democrats included, are clear that we are at war with "radical Islam." Only 24% of the nation agrees with our JV president, a man who says he is not a Muslim (as if he even believes that this would be a bad thing to be) but shows clear preference for Muslims over Christians, including in cases of immigration, cases where Christians are being killed by radical Islamists and deserve true refugee status.

It's clear that the DNC is run by people who are totally out of touch with the pulse of America (see Debbie Wasserman Schultz, for moron that).


Tweet

The convenience of Islamophobia

If Islam was a person rather than a religion, it would be an abusive husband who beats his wife and blames her for his behavior. "Look what you made me do," the abusive husband would say, always playing the victim, as the wife bleeds all over the floor.

If the mainstream media could be characterized as a person, it would be the gullible kid down the block who does the bidding of the other kids. "Hey Lester, go fetch me a can of cedar wood smoke." And Lester would do his best to accomodate.

The UK mainstream media was doing what it does best, shilling for Islam as it republished the Metropolitan Police press release discussing the "rise" in "Islamophobic" attacks in London last year. Of course, they did not release any details about the so-called Islamophobic incidents, nor will they discuss an even greater problem related to Islam, which is the even greater rise in anti-Semitic attacks in Londonstahn over the course of the past year.

The BBC reported: "Islamophobic crime in London up by 70%." 

The Telegraph reports the rise of Islamophobia against Muslim women where they are spat upon and covered in feces. 

The Metropolitan Police (aka "London Dhimmie Patrol") had a press release entitled: "Met's response to rise in Islamophobic hate crime in London."

Of course, nobody in the UK media reported on the FACT that while "Islamophobia" a word that is an oxymoron, apparently rose 70.7% (478 cases reported last year with 816 reported this year), that anti-Semitic attacks was up 93.4% (from 258 to 499). And somehow, I believe the anti-Semitic attacks were a hell of a lot more legitimate than many or most of the "Islamophobic" attacks.

In total, there were 13,007 hate crimes reported last year, making both the anti-Semitic and "Islamophobic" attacks minute in comparison to the total. 

But there are only 300,000 Jews in the UK compared to about 3,000,000 Muslims making the anti-Semitic attacks more significant by comparison, yet the anti-Semitism goes unreported. 

To use the term "Islamophobia" is a mistake at its very core. A phobia is an irrational fear that has no bearing in reality. Fear of orthodox Islam is a healthy fear that is self-preserving. There is an interesting article in Jihad Watch regarding the French Prime Minister's refusal to use this term.

In another article by Robert Spencer in Jihad Watch entitled: Did the Muslim Brotherhood invern the term "Islamophobia"? he delves into the history of the term and how the Muslim Brotherhood "ran with it" today.

ISIS is not an anomaly of Islam, it is Islam in its purest form. And Islam teaches Muslims to hate Jews and Christians--it's the first Sura, Al Fatiha and it's recited about 17 times a day on average by every religious Muslim. It refers to "those who have deserved wrath" [who are the Jews] and "the strayers" [who are the Christians].

Enjoy, my infidel friends:

Surah Al-Fatiha

Anonymous

1. BISMIL LAAHIR RAHMAANIR RAHEEM.
In the name of GOD, Most Gracious, Most Merciful

2. AL HAMDU LILLAHI RABBIL `AALAMEEN.
Praise be to GOD, Lord of the universe

3. AR RAHMAANIR RAHEEM.
Most Gracious, Most Merciful

4. MAALIKI YAWMID DEEN.
Master of the Day of Judgment

5. EYYAAKA NA`BUDU, WA EYYAAKA NASTA`EEN.
You alone we worship; You alone we ask for help

6. EH'DENAS SIRAATAL MUSTAQEEM.
Guide us in the right path

7. SIRAATAL LAZINA AN`AMTA `ALAYHIM; GHAYRIL
MAGHDOOBI `ALAYHIM WALADDAALEEN.
the path of those whom You blessed; not of those who have deserved wrath, nor of the strayers

Tweet

There's Something About Donald

In an illuminating article by Robert Spencer in Jihad Watch, Donald Trump is depicted as an outspoken, somewhat buffoonish person, who has gone after politicians such as John McCain and Lindsey Graham. In fact, Spencer even admits how it's often hard to go after the Trumpster for his attacks on these career politicians, in spite of Donald's "clumsy savaging" of McCain.

On the other hand, McCain showed similarly poor judgment "when he claimed Michele Bachmann's entirely reasonable questions about Huma Abedin's Muslim Brotherhood ties manifested an "ignorance" that "defame[d]" the spirit of the nation."

As Spencer describe it, "So when it comes to John McCain and Donald Trump, it's blowhard versus boor. But that doesn't excuse Trump."

There is no doubt, as Spencer attests to, that Americans are tired of "mealy-mouthed career politicians talking platitudes. They want a real person as president . . . "

So while it's just great that Trump is willing to fling buffalo chips and attack those who caved to immigration issues and followed the herd on the left, the billionaire businessman is not willing to defend freedom of speech when it might jeopardize his businesses in Dubai.

Let's get specific.

The American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI)/Jihad Watch Muhammad Art Exhibit and Cartoon Contest took place in Garland, Texas. The purpose of this event was for Americans to express their First Amendment right to draw a Muhammad cartoon and possibly win a prize. The event was put on by Pamela Geller, a New York City blogger who is also associated with Robert Spencer and has made many appearances with him in the past to discuss issues regarding Islamo-Fascist problems with the religion of peace. 

You might recall how 2 Muslim terrorists tried to enter the event and kill as many participants as possible, but were summarily killed by a single cop with a handgun.

Trump had this to say about Pamela Geller:

"I watched Pam earlier, and it really looks like she's just taunting everybody. What is she doing drawing Muhammad? I mean it's disgusting. Isn't there something else they could be doing? Drawing Muhammad? They can't do something else? They have to be in the middle of Texas doing something on Muhammad and insulting everybody? What is she doing? Why is she doing it? It's probably very risky for her--I don't know, maybe she likes risks. But what the hell is she doing?"

If Trump has to ask these questions, what does that say about his understanding of the Constitution?

Salman Rushdie said of this tendency we witnessed that it is a case where "Fear is being disguised as respect." And he is absolutely right.

Rushdie had a death fatwa issued by an imam of the religion of peace for writing the novel, Satanic Verses, and had gone into hiding for years. He added that if he were threatened for insulting Islam today that "these people would not come to my defence and would use the same arguments against me by accusing me of insulting an ethnic and cultural minority."



But my personal favorite quote is from Dinesh D'Souza.







Tweet

Copenhagen: Free Speech Attacked by Religious Muslim Terrorists

Copenhagen: two gunmen with automatic weapons began shooting in the Krudttoenden cafe that was hosting a free speech event featuring 68-year-old Lars Vilks, noted cartoonist. 

Vilks drew a caricature of Mohammad, the prophet of the religion of peace, as a dog, and while this wasn't true of Mohammad, the prophet was rather worse than a dog, being a pedophile, anti-Semitic, murderous, slave-owning, thief with serious sexual and mental problems that caused him to hear voices and kill anyone who spoke ill of him. 

This tradition is still being carried out today in his name but, fortunately, the Crusades are still under control and there have been no known outbreaks of crusader violence in quite some time.

Qatar Supports Islamic State Methods of Murder

Qatar is supposed to be a civilized Islamic society, or so says the Obama administration. They would never condone what the Islamic State did to Mu'ath al-Kaseasbeh, the Jordanian pilot--immolating him in a cage while filming it for propaganda and recruitment purposes. Qatar may abide by Sharia law, but burning someone to death is not something they would support.

Except they do.

Raymond Ibrahim, writing for Robert Spencer's blog, Jihad Watch, told of a popular website known as Islam Web, which is owned by Qatar's Ministry of Awqaf and Islamic Affairs. The website featured a posting that appeared February 7, 2006 titled "The Burning of las bin Abdul Yalil by Abu Bakr." The fatwa explained that the burning of people as a form of punishment is allowed under Islam. 

Another Abu Bakr, this one with an al-Baghdadi after that name, may have been influenced by this post when the IS carried out the evil, barbaric immolation of al-Kaseasbeh.

But wouldn't you know it, just hours after the Jordanian pilot was burned alive, the fatwa (number 71480) was removed from the website.

Interestingly, the IS issued their own fatwa that justified the burning alive of the pilot and it makes the same arguments the Qatar fatwa made. It cited the same hadiths, tafsirs, and "even the logic of "humility"--implying that IS may well have relied on this fatwa from the Qatari website when writing its own to burn the pilot alive--" says Ibrahim. 

"Islam Web won the World Summit Award of 2007, on the basis that it is 'the best interactive edutainment website for Arabic-speaking children' by the consensus of the Jury which met in Croatia, in evaluating the productions nominated from 160 countries," Ibrahim added.

If we refuse to identify our enemy, we are going to be speaking Arabic ourselves.

Tweet

An Important Call to Alms

The Robert Spencer website, Jihad Watch, is under cyber attack by various Islamic groups. The attackers are using massive logins to shut the site down, and in order to keep this from happening, a seriously expensive firewall must be built to protect the website.

If you don't know who Robert Spencer is, and you're concerned about the terrorism taking place all over the world, you ought to go to www.JihadWatch.org  Mr. Spencer is one of the world's foremost authorities of Islam and has written extensively on the subject, especially from the viewpoint of the infidel. Imams fear him because they cannot argue against the facts he presents in debates, so they attack him ad hominem instead. 

So what I'm suggesting is that after reading this, you go to Jihad Watch and consider making a small donation to help fund the needed firewall. These cyber jihadists are subjecting the site to over a million hits an hour, and hoping to take it down and shut Spencer up. 

I have never asked any of my readers to donate to anything (although, I must admit, I have suggested they check out my advertisers by clicking onto their ads) but I truly believe it's worth a perusal to consider it. But before you do, I wouldn't stop you from clicking on one of my ads or more, I get a pittance if you do, but then go over to Jihad Watch and consider donating. They're giving one of Robert Spencer's latest books for a $25 donation. The book alone is worth it at this time in American history where knowing who and what we're dealing with is essential to our future.

Thanks for reading this.

A New York reporter, is captured by Islamist terrorists who demand the release of three Gitmo prisoners in exchange for him. If the president refuses their demands, they plan to behead the reporter and videotape it for the Internet. But the United States doesn’t give in to terrorist’s demands and he has 24 hours before he is to be executed. The clock is ticking . . .                                         

Jihad Joe Soft Cover

click here for ebook version  

My other blog New York Canuck

Tweet

Islamophia and Unicorns

In an article entitled "The Politics of Islamophobia," the website Discoverthenetworks.org says that the term "Islamophobia" was invented in the early 1990s by the International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT), a front group for the Muslim Brotherhood. The term became an active focus of the Muslim Brotherhood after 9/11 when Islamic lobbyist organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an unindicted co-conspirator of the Holy Land Foundation, accused Americans, law-enforcement authorities, etc., of harboring a deep and potentially dangerous prejudice against Muslims. Of course, none of this was ever corroborated by FBI statistics.

Exploring the Religion of Peace in the World

Sometimes you look at what's going on in the world and you marvel at how the United States can walk on eggshells when it comes to Islam and its terror components. It amazes me how sharia law is defended by liberals who don't see a conflict with it and the Constitution. It further amazes me how our president can back the Muslim Brotherhood without fear of reprisal from the public.

Is Anderson Cooper Keeping Himself Honest?

When you're a news organization, chances are pretty good that you have liberal views. But if you're a reporter for a liberal news station, you are not excused from reporting honestly, giving all the facts that both support as well as refute your claims, and letting the public decide. Hey, you're CNN--what do you have to lose anyway, your 455 viewers?

Just another day on the job

Recently, CNN aired a piece of shamfully bad reporting on "Keeping Them Honest." I cannot imagine who is keeping Anderson "they punched me ten times in the face right in Tahrir Square--I'm such a pussy" Cooper honest. but he sure isn't doing it. I am referring to the smear-job they did on Walid Shoebat, an Islamic jihadist who saw the error of his ways and became a Christian who now helps people in Islamic countries obtain freedom. 

Before discussing Walid Shoebat, I would like to mention an article in Jihad Watch, run by Robert Spencer.  He discussed how Kerry Rubin, an Anderson Cooper assistant, approached him, ostensibly to ask if he would be interested in providing information for their show "Keeping Them Honest." Rubin said she wanted Robert to talk about issues regarding jihad and Islam.  Spencer, knowing Cooper's leftist leanings, was suspicious and terse with the questions he was asked by her, especially when she began asking about his recent work with the military, how it's funded, etc.  When Rubin saw that Spencer wasn't about to go for the bait, she said that she had another call that she must take and would get back to him--she was lying--something the left does all the time, but as long as they aren't hypocrites about it, there's no problem for them. She never called him back.

His softer side

In response to what occurred on CNN with Walid Shoebat, a friend of Spencer's, he printed a letter written by Joel Richardson, another friend and coworker of Walid Shoebat, entitled: "CNN's Anderson Cooper is a fraud, Walid Shoebat is not." The letter discussed the CNN ambushing.  In a report by Drew Griffin, a CNN crack reporter (you can define 'crack' more ways than one) tried to ambush Walid Shoebat on three points.

First, he claimed that Walid did not use his Foundation's funds to actually rescue Christians from Islamic oppression. Somehow he made it up, he is lying, and that's that. The reason they say this has to be so is because Walid refused to reveal how much money was involved--when this clown asked that question, he answered, "That is none of your business." Just because Walid was correct by telling him it was none of his business, and knowing that CNN would use anything he said to ambush him, he rufused to reveal the funding, which was simply good thinking. Of course, CNN tried to imply that he misused the money from his Foundation because he wouldn't tell Griffin the details.

The second point was that Walid lied when he said that he spent time in the Mascubia prison. They was certain he was lying because a fourth cousin of Walid's told them it was a lie. Had they vetted this fourth cousin, they would have discovered he was also related to two well-known terrorists and had good reasons to discredit him. Had they even looked deeper into the situation, they would have found that an even closer relative, a guy who was trying to discredit him three years prior to this, admitted he had been in this prison because at the time the video was made, this wasn't the "damning" issue they were discussing. 

Lastly, they said he never was involved with bombing the Bethlehem branch of Bank Leumi because they called the bank and this supposedly didn't happen. When it was learned that the Bethlehem branch no longer exists, Cooper and Griffin said they spoke with the Tel Aviv branch. Of course this branch had no records of the Bethlehem branch, so that's nonsense too. Finally, in order not to look like a the team from Dumb and Dumber, they said they spoke to the Israeli Police station in Bethlehem. Unfortunately, there is no Israeli Police station in Bethlehem.  Also, if they bothered to go to the same information given by the closer relative who actually had an axe to grind (literally), three years prior to this report, they would have heard him mention the fact that Walid was known to place a few "parcels behind the bank" from time-to-time. But CNN has its own agenda, and truth isn't on the list.

I have recently learned that CNN plans to do a "full expose" of "Islamophobia," a term made up by Islamists to shame the west into believing that we are racists and are phobic against Islam. It isn't a phobia if it isn't irrational. Americans are very sensitive to being labelled a 'racist.' Nobody wants to be thought of that way, which is why Islamists invented this term, and why if a non-Muslim calls you a racist, he or she is probably a liberal.

So anyway, here we have another mainstream media story that is full of lies, poor research, or worse, pure deception, and a television network that too many Americans believe is telling the truth. This is even true about the Daily Show, where most young liberals get their "news." After all, if it's on TV as news, it must be true.  You need to see this video about CNN and their lies--it's 8 minutes long and well-worth the time investment. If you're concerned, like any good American would be, you might just tune out CNN, or at least learn to question what is being told as truth. The mainstream media is in trouble, and it's all their fault. People are not as gullible as they believe, and they are getting their news from the blogs, online media, and hopefully they are looking at both sides of the issues. Americans are smarter than they give us credit for--Soros and his socialist colleagues think they have us all fooled, but that only makes them the real fools. America will prevail.


Comments are always appreciated.
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Tweet