Tucker Carlson is oblivious to those 'killed by radical Islam'

One is repeatedly assured that terrorism is a multifaceted phenomenon, with threats emanating from every corner of the ideological spectrum. Yet when one examines the most authoritative data, a rather different picture emerges, one that many suicidal cretins in the West seem determined to obscure.

The most reliable comprehensive assessment remains the Global Terrorism Index (GTI) 2025, published by the Institute for Economics & Peace, covering incidents through 2024. It records some 8,000–8,500 terrorism deaths globally in that year, with the overwhelming majority perpetrated by radical Islamist groups such as Islamic State, al-Shabaab, JNIM, Boko Haram, and their affiliates. Islamic State alone was responsible for 1,805 deaths across 22 countries, concentrated principally in Syria and the Democratic Republic of Congo. But it seems that Tucker Carlson isn't aware of this, nor personally knows anyone killed by radical [aka orthodox] Islam.

The four deadliest terrorist organizations, all Islamist, accounted for the bulk of these fatalities, well over 80% of those reliably attributed. Over 98% of terrorism deaths occurred in conflict zones, chiefly the Sahel, sub-Saharan Africa, Somalia, Syria, and Afghanistan, where radical Islamist militants continue to dominate. Tucker knows nobody in these attacks who have been killed by radical Muslims.

Independent corroboration comes from sources such as the Africa Center for Strategic Studies, which documents tens of thousands of fatalities linked to militant Islamist violence on the continent in recent years, figures that represent nearly all terrorism deaths there.

As for 2025 itself, up to the end of this year, no complete global report yet exists, given the inevitable lag in databases like the Global Terrorism Database or the forthcoming GTI. Activity, however, appears to persist at levels comparable to or marginally below 2024, with Islamic State claiming around 1,100 attacks worldwide this year. 

Notable Islamist-inspired incidents include the January 1 New Orleans truck attack (14–15 deaths, IS-inspired) alongside ongoing assaults in Syria, Pakistan, Africa, and occasional strikes in Europe, often yielding casualties in the low double digits. 

Africa remains the undisputed epicentre, with unrelenting high-lethality operations by groups such as al-Shabaab in Somalia and Islamic State affiliates across the Sahel, Mozambique, and Nigeria.

Both historically and in the present day, radical Islamist extremism, carefully distinguished from Islam as a faith, stands as the predominant driver of global terrorism fatalities, responsible for 90–95% or more of deaths in recent years according to multiple authoritative sources (GTI, Fondapol studies, and others). Non-Islamist terrorism, far-right, separatist, or otherwise, claims far fewer lives worldwide, though it receives disproportionate attention in Western nations.

Precise tallies naturally vary depending on definitions (whether battlefield deaths in active conflicts are excluded, or only strict civilian-targeted attacks counted), yet the pattern is unmistakable: Islamist-related terrorism deaths run into the high thousands annually in recent years, overwhelmingly in conflict-ravaged Muslim-majority regions where the victims themselves are predominantly Muslim.

One might have thought this reality would inform public discourse more honestly. Instead, we are often treated to a peculiar reluctance to name the obvious, a reluctance that does no service to the victims, nor to the cause of genuine understanding.

Grok says of radical Islamic killings: Exact counts vary by definition (e.g., excluding battlefield deaths in conflicts vs. strict civilian-targeted attacks), but estimates for Islamist-related terrorism deaths are typically in the high thousands to low tens of thousands annually in recent years, concentrated in conflict-affected Muslim-majority regions where victims are predominantly Muslim.

So while Tucker Carlson doesn't know anyone killed by radical Islam, radical Islam knows the score.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work and my coffee drinking habit. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you from doing me that solid. Imagine, you could be the first on your block to do that and your friends will thank you . . . for some reason. 

Tweet

Traitor Joe "set to free" 9/11 hijacker and flip off the dead Americans

Our house plant in the White House has gone too far this time. It's bad enough he can't complete a full sentence without screwing it up, and that he lies with every breath he takes. Now this garbage of a president has scheduled to free the 9/11 terrorist who missed United Airlines Flight 93 in which four of his terrorist buddies intended to fly into a Pentagon.

Mohammed al-Qahtani has been incarcerated in Guantanamo Bay for the past 19 years because he missed out on being a martyr by killing as many Americans as possible.

Biden has angered and shocked leading GOP legislators. But why shock when you consider the source: a brain addled, lying, un-American politician who can't tell his wife from his sister. This decision is the worst possible move that will show the world what wusses we are, and how our country has dishonored the memories of our dead.

The reason al-Qahtani couldn't fulfill his evil mission was only due to the fact that he was denied entry into the US on that fateful day in 2001. So now he will be released from Gitmo and moved to the friendly sands of Saudi Arabia. [It's doubtful that he'd get the Jamal Khashoggi treatment there. They might even treat him like a freaking hero.]

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia will put the scumbag into a custodial program and psychological wellness care program--kind of like a 12-step program for jihadis. "Hello, my name is Mohammed and I'm a terrorist."

The recidivism rate in that program is about 100%, so good luck.

The Left hates, hates, hates America. 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL) lead Republican on the House Armed Services Committee described Biden's move as a shocking capitulation to the Left. But let's face it, Biden is a sock puppet with Ron Klain's hand up his butt making all the moves. Unless, of course, it's Obama.

Rogers said that allowing al-Qahtani to walk free is a horrifying decision. Then he recounted how Al-Qaeda killed about 3,000 Americans.

The Democrats are terrorist appeasers and they even have a few in their party who are quite open about it [their names rhyme with Billhan Gomar and Ratbeetah Pahleeb].

Tweet

How Trump should debate Clinton

I have a few questions and thoughts that I hope the media eventually gets around to asking Hillary Clinton. If not, I hope that Donald Trump will mention them to her in the debate scheduled for September 26th. 

Unfortunately, I don't have much hope that either the media or Trump will ask these questions or make these points  because the mainstream media tends to campaign for Clinton, while Trump tends to retaliate against her statements in service to his ego.

The first question I would ask is: "You said you left the White House "dead broke," and when you actually did leave, you took about $28,000 worth of items with you. Did you hope to sell those items in order to get back on your feet?"

And here's an issue Trump might bring up at the debate: "You called me 'anti-Semitic' and a 'racist.' We both have children married to Jews but you, Hillary, are good friends with another Jew, Sidney Blumenthal. His son, Max, has written extensively on anti-Zionist issues and you've even complimented Max's writing to his father. 

"Also, your top aide, Huma Abedin, worked as an assistant editor at her mother's radical Muslim journal--a journal that, while Huma worked there, blamed America for 9/11. The journal also opposed women's rights, instead, bowing to Sharia law, which puts women in an inferior position as viewed in Western society." 

Huma worked at the journal as late as 2008. And insofar as being a racist, we need to compare the number of blacks and Hispanics Trump has hired over those to those Hillary has hired.

For more information on Huma Abedin's work as assistant editor, as well as the work of her mother, go to MailOnline . It will open your eyes.

Speaking about immigration, Donald Trump is married to an immigrant. Hillary Clinton is married to a sexual predator.

Trump then needs to make this move: "You claimed at a rally for the black vote that you "always" carry hot sauce in your bag. Are you willing to show us the hot sauce now?" 

Obviously, he can't ask that question at the debate because Hillary's purse will not be at the podium and by the time it's brought out (should she agree) one of Hillary's flunkies will have put a bottle of it in her bag.

Another question: "Why did you use BleachBit to wipe your personal email server clean? Did you have secret yoga moves and marital hints on it that you didn't want the public to see?"

BleachBit is a program that can scramble data from hard drives and render it unreadable. For a woman who thinks you wipe a server "what, like with a cloth?" she really seemed to know what she was doing.

Will Donald Trump stay on message? Will the media fairly question and report the news?

When chickens blacken the sky over Washington D.C.

Tweet

DNC ad attacks GOP on term "radical Islam"

Awad quotes Sura 9:5 "Sura of the Sword"

The DNC (evidently standing for Department of Nut-jobs and Communists) has made an ad denouncing the GOP's use of the term 'radical Islam.' A post in mediaite.com "DNC Ad Attacking Republicans for Saying 'Radical Islam' Is Laughably Stupid" discusses the new ad.

The DNC is attempting to convince people, whose intelligence they have no respect for, that to use the term 'radical Islam' is to say that all Muslims are terrorists. This is as laughable as Bill Clinton's "I did not have sex with that woman  .  .  .  Monica Lewinsky."

As pointed out by Robert Spencer, this move by the DNC is an attempt to make the willful ignorance of Islamic jihadist terrorism appear as if it's a virtue. Spencer argues: "The DNC claims that to say 'radical Islam' is to say that all Muslims are terrorists. That is tantamount to claiming that to say 'Italian mafia' is to assert that all Italians are mafiosi."

The DNC used George W. Bush, a president they've hated for his 8 years in office, as "exemplary" in his "denial of the nature of the jihad threat." You might notice Nihad Awad, National Board member of CAIR standing behind Bush nodding his head to Bush's dhimmie statement.

We know that CAIR is a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial. The MB was convicted of funding Islamic radical terrorism. They were not convicted of funding Muslim terrorism, as the DNC would try to convince you.

Derp

Most Americans, 56% of Democrats included, are clear that we are at war with "radical Islam." Only 24% of the nation agrees with our JV president, a man who says he is not a Muslim (as if he even believes that this would be a bad thing to be) but shows clear preference for Muslims over Christians, including in cases of immigration, cases where Christians are being killed by radical Islamists and deserve true refugee status.

It's clear that the DNC is run by people who are totally out of touch with the pulse of America (see Debbie Wasserman Schultz, for moron that).


Tweet

Who really won the Dem debate?

Who won the Democratic debate Saturday? Easy--the winner was . . . ISIS.

All three candidates went through excruciating calisthenics to avoid using the word "radical Islam," on the heels of a radical Islamic attack in Paris, France.

I'm not surprised Hillary Clinton wasn't honest about it--hell, she's the type of liar who can tell the families of four dead Americans from the radical Islamic attack in Benghazi that the cause was a video a handful of people in the world got to see.

But for Bernie Sanders to tap dance around those words is almost sad. Sanders obviously didn't want to talk about Islamic terrorism and said that he didn't think the term "is what's important." (It sounded more like he used the word "impawtant" but I looked it up and it doesn't exist.)

 As a Jew, Sanders is a member of Islam's most hated group of human beings. Jews are so hated by Muslims throughout the world, that Muslims don't consider them to be human, Nobel Prizes aside. Jews are  referred to as 'apes,' by the religion of peace.

They aren't fond of Christians either, referring to us as 'pigs.' But look who's calling the kettle 'black.'

When the panel was asked if they agree with Sen. Marco Rubio who said that "We are at war with radical Islam," the wife of former President Bill Clinton said that calling it such would be "painting with too broad a brush," and also said the term was "not particularly helpful."

"I don't think we're at war with Islam. I don't think we're at war with all Muslims. I think we're at war with jihadists," the Scandal Queen said, as if jihadists and Muslims were of different religions and had nothing to do with each other.

Guess which party Muslims are going to be voting for. And guess how many "radical Islamic extremists" are going to be entering the country as refugees. The winner of this guessing contest wins an AK-47 and a year's supply of ammo.

On the other hand, Hillary did concede that we are at war with "violent extremists" who use religion for "power" and "oppression." That must have been hard  for her to say, what with her closest aide, Huma Abedin, tied to the Muslim Brotherhood and Sisterhood by her own family.

Actually, Hill, Islam itself calls for power and oppression over ''unbelievers", but you would have known that if you had read the Koran, the Islamic version of Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals," a book you so love, a book dedicated to Lucifer. Even President Obama has quoted anarchist Alinsky to Israeli students.

Former Maryland Gov. O'Malley, like Hillary and Bernie, took the low road to avoid offending terrorists and non-violent Muslims. "I believe calling it what it is . . . radical jihadis. Let's not fall into the trap of thinking that all our Muslim-American neighbors in this country are somehow our enemies here. They are our first line of defense . . . We need our Muslim-American neighbors to stand up and to be part of this," said the man who backed down after saying that "all lives matter."

It looks like our "first line of defense" is being very quiet about the latest Paris attack, just like they were with the Charlie Hebdo attack back in January. If Muslim-Americans are our first line of defense, they need to speak up, speak out, and tell us who in their community sees us as the enemy.

But they don't.

O'Malley and his ideas are as useless as they were when he was the mayor of the failed city of Baltimore.

So far, French President Francois Hollande has shown strength--he called the Paris attack "an act of war" with ISIS. Now the ball is in his court, so to speak; we shall see what he does to back up his rhetoric.

Hopefully, Hollande will not take Hillary's advice of "showing "respect even for one's enemy," and to try to "empathize with their perspective and point of view." These are the words of an idiot who has no business being commander in chief of our nation. She tried to walk it back by saying "It is important to try to understand your adversary in order to figure out how they are thinking, what they will be doing, how they will react."

When you drop napalm on the bastards that immolated the caged Jordanian pilot, who gives a damn what they are thinking? We know how they will react--they will scream a lot and then they will stop screaming very quickly.

That's how you fight a war--shock and awe--the strategy comes from knowing their ideology and calling it for what it is so that you can predict their next move and know where to find them.

Mosques might be a good place to look, but liberal idiots like Bill DeBlasio don't want to infiltrate them where they plan because like all PC leftists, they don't want to offend them.



Tweet

Another Usaama shot and killed attacking police

Boston--According to Breitbart News, a man of Middle Eastern decent, apparently in his 20s, was under surveillance by a joint counter-terrorism task force and was confronted by an FBI agent. The man was carrying a  K-bar style knife and refused to drop it when police ordered him to do so.

The suspect was on foot and officers who had been watching him wanted to speak with him but he turned and came at the officers with the knife and was shot and killed. He was taken to Brigham and Women's Hospital but died there of his wounds.

Boston police commissioner William Evans told the Boston Globe "The officers have been surveilling him and again they wanted to speak to him . . . and he turned and our officers gave several commands for him to drop the weapon and unfortunately he came at the officers and they did what they were trained to do and that's never an easy decision for any officer to make."

Boston's mayor Martin Walsh visited the scene, a CVS in a shopping plaza, but didn't comment.

As this incident did not involve a white cop shooting a black suspect, Al Sharpton did not attend nor comment, and still has not paid his back taxes.

A neighbor described the victim whose name is Usaama Rahim as generally pleasant enough and told this neighbor that "he liked him because he treated him better than most other Americans did." But the neighbor added that Usaama seemed unusually guarded and anxious during a brief encounter at the local pharmacy on Tuesday morning.

The suspect were allegedly investigating Usaama Rahim to determine whether he "had become radicalized by ISIS-inspired social media messages," or from simply doing a careful reading of the Koran.

The police have expressed their gratitude to the public for not throwing rocks at them during the encounter, but they added that they totally understand if the public chooses to march against them for this brutal act of self-defense.

The Rev. Al Sharpton said that he will take this into consideration and added, "No justice, no peas."

Tweet

Not Very Earnest, Josh

White House press secretary Josh Notso Earnest refuses to describe the Islamic terrorist attacks in France by radical Muslims as "radical Islam." The excuse he uses is that to call it that is not accurate.

So the French don't know what they're talking about. The rest of Europe has no clue as to who is really killing people simply for insulting the warrior who created this horrible religion of hate. Maybe it's the Amish or Presbyterians. No, wait! It must be the Jews--yeah, that's the ticket.

Mara Liasson from National Public Radio said that the French "are calling the ideology, the warped view, by a name," and asked the man whose name is an oxymoron, "is there a reason for that?"

Earnest replied: "The first is accuracy. These are individuals who carried out an act of terrorism and they later tried to justify an act of terrorism by invoking Islam and their own deviant view. The second is, this was an act that was condemned by Muslim leaders. We have not chosen to use that label because it does not accurately describe what happened," then added, "We are trying to be as specific as possible."

This is the kind of apologetic garbage that the Obama administration has been pawning off on the public for 6 years. It's a lie and it's a damn lie at that.

Anyone who knows anything substantial about Islam knows that this religion has never tolerated anyone who has challenged it. Insulting the prophet of Islam will get you killed. Anyone making a movie about Islam that sheds a negative light on it, will get you killed--ask Theo Van Gogh--oh wait, you can't--he was murdered for that.

The terrorists who killed those people in Paris did so in the name of Islam. That's the key. They simply followed the teachings of the Koran and the words of many imams who say one thing in public (for Josh Earnest to use) and another thing in private (for jihadists to use). The Jews were killed for the crime of being Jews. The Koran is very clear about how Jews should be treated.

Anyone who takes Josh Earnest seriously, has no understanding of the realities of Islam.



Tweet

Fatah the "Moderate" Palestinian Authority Party

The U.N. condemns Israel and while it touts Palestinian leader, Abbas, the so-called moderate of the region and darling of all who hate Jews simply for being born Jews. 

In an article in the  Daily Mail by Jenny Stanton (Jan. 3, 2015) "Outrage after Palestinian political party posts mocked up image online showing huge piles of skulls with Jewish stars of David on them," an image of skulls was posted on social media by Fatah, the party of President Mahmoud Abbas. The words "lingering on your skulls" was posted alongside.

Ofir Gendelman, the Arab media spokesman for the Israeli Prime Minister said the image is "despicable," and questioned just how moderate the Fatah party really is.

In my estimation regarding the differences between moderates and radical Muslims, I see the radicals as those who behead you and moderates as those who want you beheaded. 

Not all that much difference is there?

Tweet