Reliable source leaks names of next to go on CNN hit list

Last Thursday was a tragic day in the history of our media. The sun turned to blood and there was gnashing of teeth and wailing among men of strength. People were out on the streets and in airports all across our great nation, feeling scared and luckless to the point that many refused to board the planes they were supposed to take because they felt their collective luck had run out. 

Just kidding. Brian Stelter was fired from the Compromised News Network (CNN) and the birds were singing, planes flew safely, and all was well in the world. But now that Spud Stelter is gone, what's next?

Well, reliable source Jon Nicosia believes that Stelter isn't going to be the last one out the door, according to Brodigan. [H/T Louder With Crowder]

Nicosia has a decent resume having worked for Mediaite, Independent Journal Review and the Washington Examiner and knows a thing or three and he has a source who leaked about Stelter when he left CNN's new president Chris Licht.

Nicosia's source could obviously be wrong, but he or she has earned the right to be heard, if not believed. And according to the reliable source, we might be bidding farewell to such leftists as John Berman, Jake Tapper, Don da' Lemon, John King, Alisyn Camerota and my personal favorite to get the boot, Jim "Dear Diary" Acosta.

Licht was brought aboard the CNN garbage barge to try to balance it slightly to the middle and decrease its vacuous suck. The network has been so crappy that it had to pay airports to air it in their waiting areas.

But will the dream come true? Will the network deep six the current crew and start fresh with people who are there to report the news with a lot less spin and a lot more factual information?

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Pshaw! Who are we kidding?

In any case, we shall see what comes about as the ship of fools attempts to right itself to avoid sinking even more in the ratings. After all, who do they think they are, Joe Biden?

Tweet

Comedy News Network's Tapper under fire for his thunderous silence

A former journalist at the Comedy News Network (CNN) and current "news" anchor Jake Tapper is under the gun for sitting silent when a guest on his show said that President Trump radicalized more people than ISIS. Had the guest taken it a step further and said that Trump is worse than Hitler and Stalin, it's likely that Tapper would have merely nodded in the affirmative.

Just a few hours later, the network's mentally challenged person, Don Lemon, declared that Democrats don't kill people but Republicans do. This drew the anger of Majority Whip Steve Scalise who was shot and nearly killed by a Bernie Sanders supporter.

CNN has sunk to a low that is lower than whale poop. And their rhetoric is just as disgusting.

After the CNN headquarters in New York was evacuated when a pipe bomb was discovered in the mailroom last week, the network called for civility, but honest people and critics see they only care about hate speech when it comes from those on the right.

This point came to its ugly head when controversial GQ Magazine schmucklette Julia Ioffe was on Tapper's "The Lead" Monday during a debate about hateful rhetoric.

"I think this president, one of the things that he really launched his presidential run on is talking about Islamic radicalization and this president has radicalized so many more people than ISIS ever did," the factless, feckless Ioffe said.

Tapper just sat there contemplating his impending flatulence. But David Urban, the panel's token conservative, did not like what he was hearing from that lunatic who continued her bloviating and the fact that Tapper just sat there like a schmuck.

"Jake, for you not to push back on that is irresponsible. That's irresponsible. For her to say the President of the United States has radicalized more people than ISIS is irresponsible," Urban said.

Tapper replied, "Okay, you disagree with it," as other panelists rudely talked over each other as Ioffe stood fast by her fact less claim.

Joe Wulfsohn of Mediaite told Fox News that it was "truly unbelievable to see a widely-esteemed anchor like Jake Tapper to have no reaction to Ioffe's ridiculous claim."

"And for him to essentially treat it like it was a normal opinion the way he did was disconcerting," Wulfsohn added.

Curtis Houck of NewsBusters said the lack of pushback by Tapper was "disgraceful."

"CNN is not interested in unifying this country because they'd rather bring on guests like Ioffe to sow further division and create split screens between the President and protesters as he visits the synagogue," Houck said.

Ioffe offered a fake apology as the left often does, and the network has booked her for more controversial opinions that are backed with no facts.

Ioffe is the same pig who was fired from Politico in 2016 for an obscene tweet implying that Trump was  having an incestuous relationship with his daughter Ivanka, making Ioffe perfect for CNN's taste.

It's one thing to have a bias in journalism, another thing to promote hatred. CNN sucks and should have its plug pulled.


Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

Leftists immediately attack Sarah Huckabee Sanders

It didn't take more than a New York microsecond for the liberals to criticize White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders. She is only the third woman ever to be appointed to that post since it began in 1929 but that didn't stop the 'identification party' who pretends to support women and minorities.

Predictably, a number of sexist twits on Twitter tweeted about her physical appearance, which should tell you everything you need to know about them.

"sarah huckabee sanders reminds me of someone that would have pushed me into a locker in middle school" --Talia Lavin (@chick_in_kiev)

I believe Talia Levin was pushed into school lockers many times over in middle school just for being a scumcrumpet. She probably got her fair share of atomic wedgies as well.

If not, she probably deserved them.

"Sarah Huckabee Sanders looks like every woman eating lobster on a cruise ship" --Damien Fahey (@DamienFahey).

Damien evidently spent a lot of time checking out people's plates on cruise ships--maybe it turns him on. But what's really clear is that Damien is a sexist pig, the kind that his liberal goombahs like to label conservatives.

And if Sarah reminds him of "every woman eating lobster" that means she is a good representative of every woman, as opposed to Hillary Clinton who is a good representative of someone who, by being a woman is her biggest accomplishment.

"I think it's, certainly professionally, one of the greatest honors that any person could ever have, to work in any capacity within this building," Sarah said. "And to get to do that up here, in such a public way and speak on behalf of the president is absolutely an honor.

An honor that Talia Levin and Damien Fahey will never know as they ooze envy and sexism in their words.

But it's Mediaite that attacked Huckabee Sanders simply because she's a conservative. They posit that she and the females of "Trumpland" hurt women:

"How Sarah Sanders and the Women of Trumpland Hurt Women (Column by @KylieTCheung)

The article cites Kellyanne Conway, Betsy DeVos and Ivanka Trump claiming the "women of Trumpland all, in some way or another, use their platforms to hurt other women."

"The unfortunate reality is that very few women will ever have the influence of Hillary Clinton, who uses her status as former First Lady and former Secretary of State to sell her influence by securing large donations for her so-called "foundation."

Wait!

Cheung didn't write that. No, the leftist wrote: "The unfortunate reality is that very few women will ever have the influence of Ivanka, who uses her status as First Daughter to promote her brand while exploiting the working mothers of her overseas factories."

Socialists always scream "exploiting" when people who would otherwise starve are given low-paying jobs in which they can eventually grow as evidenced in South Korea, for example.

Cheung blathered on: "Few will ever have the influence of DeVos, who uses her position as education secretary to convene with groups that bully rape victims."

What? Cheung doesn't explain what 'bully rape' means nor give actual examples. DeVos didn't need this job--she is an incredibly wealthy woman and believes strongly in charter schools because they work, in spite of their non-union status. Actually, because of their non-union status.

"And few will ever command the audiences of Conway and Sanders, who use their platforms to deny Trump sexism."

They don't deny Trump's past and never excused it. Cheung must have confused them with the Bill Clinton-era media and his supporters. She must have also confused Conway and Sanders with liberals like Hillary Clinton who support gender-selective abortions that weed out girl babies. Both Conway and Sanders are pro-life.

Supporters of Sarah Huckabee Sanders also tweeted and took swipes at the liberals who insulted her:

"Actually it's feminists who hurt women by their complete obsession with being offended" --Michelle oh (@mkohlrogge)

Another tweeted:

"It is official-Liberals belong to the snarky mean girls club. What hypocrites as the next thing out of their mouth is "anti-bullying" --Linda white (@lwhite3540)

Like the Antifa movement that claims to be against fascism, the hypocrisy of these liberals is just as palpable. 


Tweet

DNC ad attacks GOP on term "radical Islam"

Awad quotes Sura 9:5 "Sura of the Sword"

The DNC (evidently standing for Department of Nut-jobs and Communists) has made an ad denouncing the GOP's use of the term 'radical Islam.' A post in mediaite.com "DNC Ad Attacking Republicans for Saying 'Radical Islam' Is Laughably Stupid" discusses the new ad.

The DNC is attempting to convince people, whose intelligence they have no respect for, that to use the term 'radical Islam' is to say that all Muslims are terrorists. This is as laughable as Bill Clinton's "I did not have sex with that woman  .  .  .  Monica Lewinsky."

As pointed out by Robert Spencer, this move by the DNC is an attempt to make the willful ignorance of Islamic jihadist terrorism appear as if it's a virtue. Spencer argues: "The DNC claims that to say 'radical Islam' is to say that all Muslims are terrorists. That is tantamount to claiming that to say 'Italian mafia' is to assert that all Italians are mafiosi."

The DNC used George W. Bush, a president they've hated for his 8 years in office, as "exemplary" in his "denial of the nature of the jihad threat." You might notice Nihad Awad, National Board member of CAIR standing behind Bush nodding his head to Bush's dhimmie statement.

We know that CAIR is a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial. The MB was convicted of funding Islamic radical terrorism. They were not convicted of funding Muslim terrorism, as the DNC would try to convince you.

Derp

Most Americans, 56% of Democrats included, are clear that we are at war with "radical Islam." Only 24% of the nation agrees with our JV president, a man who says he is not a Muslim (as if he even believes that this would be a bad thing to be) but shows clear preference for Muslims over Christians, including in cases of immigration, cases where Christians are being killed by radical Islamists and deserve true refugee status.

It's clear that the DNC is run by people who are totally out of touch with the pulse of America (see Debbie Wasserman Schultz, for moron that).


Tweet

Where Weak is Strong and Strong is Weak

President Obama put Vladimir's mind at east yesterday when he assured the Russian president that the United States will not get into an "actual war" with Russia, and said that "What we are going to do is mobilize all of our diplomatic resources to make sure that we've got a strong international coalition that will send a clear message." (Reported by Mediaite, March 20, 2014.) Perhaps he's trying to keep his options open for us to unleash a virtual war, but I don't think that's the case.

Obama believes that sending the military would not be appropriate, nor be in the best interests of Ukraine. What he seems to believe is that harshly worded sentences by us and our European allies is the key to persuading former KGB operative, Putin, to turn tail and give up. What Obama doesn't seem to understand is that even our European allies laugh at our leader.

The best part of the entire Obama presentation on the subject was when he claimed that Putin "acted out of weakness" when he sent troops into Crimea because "he didn't want Ukrainians to make their own decisions about their own future." This like saying that a father is weak for telling his daughter that he doesn't want her going out with a boy he doesn't trust. If that's the case, then Obama must see strength in a father who allows his 11 year old to stay out as long as the kid sees fit, because Dad is strong enough to trust him.

Obama has strength confused with naivety, and weakness confused with using force for one's own gains. Obama is weak so maybe his confusion comes from thinking he is actually strong.

Joey: "Dad, Kevin smacked me in the face for no reason. Then he laughed at me."
Dad: "What did you do when he smacked you?"
Joey: "I punched him in his face and he ran away crying."
Dad: "I think Kevin isn't going to do that again. You did the right thing."

Little boy: "Mr. Obama, that boy hit me in my face and said I was a girl."
Obama: "What did you do when he did that?"
Little boy: "I ran away and then I came to you."
Obama: "You did the right thing. Fighting is never the answer and there's nothing wrong with being called a girl. Some grown men think they're a girl with the body of a man, and some girls think they're a man with the body of a girl. It's all the same."

I believe a conversation like this  is becoming more "normal". How sad.




Tweet