Showing posts with label White House Press Secretary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label White House Press Secretary. Show all posts

Saturday, October 17, 2026

Trump’s New Press Secretary Lasted Days Before Her Credentials Became the Story

The White House press secretary’s job is to defend the president, handle hostile questions from the press, and explain the administration’s policies without accidentally creating a political firestorm. Katie Zacharia managed to run into trouble with all three before she had much time to learn where the briefing room was.

As of October 17, 2026, Zacharia’s abrupt departure appears to have resulted from a spectacularly ill-timed combination of questionable professional credentials, a disastrous debut before reporters, and President Trump’s apparent loss of confidence in his newest spokesperson.

The White House press operation had barely gotten started before the story became less about the administration’s agenda and more about whether its press secretary had been describing herself with a professional title she had never quite legally earned.

To be clear, Zacharia has not been convicted of a crime, and the allegations against her remain allegations. Trump has denied firing her, although he reportedly urged her to reconsider the position before the White House confirmed her departure. Still, the episode has provided a useful demonstration of how quickly a political appointment can turn into a public-relations emergency.

The Lawyer Who Never Passed the Bar

The most damaging controversy concerned Zacharia’s repeated descriptions of herself as a lawyer and attorney.

Zacharia graduated from Pepperdine University’s law school in 2011. She subsequently took the California bar exam, failed, and never retook it, according to her own statements. That means she isn't a licensed attorney, although she played one at the lecturn. 

Public-record searches by news organizations reportedly found no evidence that she was licensed to practice law in any U.S. state or Washington, D.C. Nevertheless, she had repeatedly described herself as a lawyer or attorney. Trump actually used the title when announcing her appointment.

There is, of course, a difference between graduating from law school and being admitted to practice law. One earns a degree. The other requires satisfying the applicable licensing requirements. Apparently, the distinction became considerably more important once Zacharia was expected to explain things to the national press.

Zacharia defended herself by saying she had received advice that she could describe herself as a lawyer because she possessed a law degree and had international legal experience. She also said she worked on international transactions while employed by a law firm in Beijing. However, that is pure bull pucks.

That explanation did little to extinguish the controversy. CNN, the media outlet that only seems to do a deep dive when it's against someone one the right, reportedly identified at least 15 social media posts in which she referred to herself as an attorney.

On October 14, the watchdog organization Campaign for Accountability filed a complaint asking the California State Bar to investigate whether Zacharia had unlawfully represented herself as qualified to practice law.

The complaint does not establish that she broke the law, and it is not a criminal conviction. But it does mean that a press secretary who was supposed to defend the administration suddenly found herself needing a defense of her own professional biography.

A Press Briefing That Briefly Became a Career-Ending Event

If the credentials controversy was the first problem, Zacharia’s debut behind the White House podium did little to improve matters. And speaking of matters, it turned out to be a clusterfrack debut. 

Her first briefing on October 13 lasted about 14 minutes. She answered questions from only three reporters and appeared nervous and hesitant while reading prepared remarks. At one point, she mistakenly referred to her husband as "my president" before correcting herself.

The White House press secretary is expected to handle aggressive questioning, defend presidential policies, and respond to unexpected developments without making the administration wish someone else had been sent into the room.

Zacharia’s performance reportedly failed to inspire confidence. According to Axios, a White House official said Trump was unimpressed.

There was, however, a mitigating circumstance. Zacharia said she had been given less than eight hours on the job before receiving her briefing book that morning.

That is hardly an ideal preparation schedule for one of the most demanding communications positions in Washington. Even so, the White House had apparently discovered that appointing someone to a high-profile job and preparing that person to perform it are two separate administrative functions.

The briefing was short. The fallout was considerably longer.

Television Interviews Made Matters Worse

After questions about her credentials intensified, Zacharia turned to conservative media outlets to explain herself.

During an interview with Sean Hannity, she acknowledged that she had failed the California bar exam and never retaken it. She explained that she had been preparing to move to China with her husband (not the President) and considered the result inconsequential at the time.

Hannity pressed her on why she had not simply explained that she attended law school, took the bar exam, and failed, rather than relying on distinctions between the words lawyer and attorney.

It was a reasonable question, and one that highlighted the problem facing Zacharia. The more she explained her terminology, the more attention the terminology received.

A press secretary’s first responsibility is to keep the spotlight on the president’s agenda. Zacharia’s interviews instead encouraged the press to examine her résumé, her public statements, and the precise meaning of the titles she had used.

The administration had hired a spokesperson. It had inadvertently acquired another story for the spokesperson to explain.

Trump Was Reportedly Blindsided

According to Axios, Trump was blindsided when he learned that Zacharia was not licensed to practice law in the United States, despite having announced her appointment by describing her as an attorney.

Reports also indicated that he was dissatisfied with her initial briefing and her subsequent explanations.

By October 16, the president was publicly suggesting that she reconsider the position.

“Honestly, if I were you, I’d reconsider.”

Trump also defended Zacharia against media criticism and said he wanted her to have a good life. He denied firing her, even as reports indicated that she was leaving the position.

That distinction may matter to the official account of her departure, but it does little to change the political reality. When a president publicly suggests that his press secretary should reconsider her job after only a few days, the appointment is unlikely to be enjoying a period of renewed confidence. 

Three Problems, One Very Short Tenure

Zacharia’s departure appears to have been driven by three overlapping failures.

First, the credentials controversy. Her repeated use of the titles lawyer and attorney became a serious credibility problem after she acknowledged failing the bar exam and never retaking it. The resulting complaint remains an allegation, not a proven finding of misconduct. She was actually sounding like Abdul El Sayed with his claim of being a physician.

Second, the disastrous debut. Her first briefing raised questions about her readiness to serve as the administration’s principal spokesperson. The limited preparation time she described provides relevant context, but it did not prevent the performance from becoming another source of criticism.

Third, the loss of presidential confidence. Trump reportedly disliked her performance and was unhappy about the controversy surrounding her background. Once the president himself became dissatisfied, her prospects of surviving the episode grew considerably dimmer.

There were also reports that her appointment had been rushed and that she lacked strong institutional support inside the White House. Those factors may have contributed to the outcome. The available reporting does not establish that Zacharia alone was responsible for every failure surrounding her brief tenure.

The Bottom Line

Katie Zacharia’s brief time as White House press secretary appears to have collapsed under the weight of two problems that proved difficult to separate: questions about her professional credentials and doubts about her ability to handle the job.

Her repeated descriptions of herself as a lawyer despite never passing a U.S. bar exam became a damaging distraction. Her first briefing did little to reassure the administration, and her subsequent media appearances failed to settle the controversy.

As detailed above, there is no established finding that she committed a crime, and the complaint filed against her has not been shown to have resulted in a substantiated finding of misconduct. Trump has also denied firing her, despite reports that he urged her to reconsider the position. With all that said, I suspect the President did, indeed, fire her or make it so clear that she needed to go that she had no choice.

What is clear is that the White House press secretary’s office is not an especially forgiving place to discover that a résumé, a professional title, and a presidential announcement can become three separate problems.

Zacharia’s tenure was supposed to help the administration communicate its message. Instead, it left the administration explaining why its own spokesperson had become the message.

Hey patriots! Please take time to give a click on the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.


Sunday, June 6, 2021

Comedy News Network's Brian Stelter kisses Psaki's butt on TV


Okay, he didn't actually kiss Jen Psaki's butt, he kissed it metaphorically while licking her boots and giving her a back massage with hot oils.

The Comedy News Network has not sunk to a new low in journalism--they were always lower than whale feces [which is at the bottom of the ocean] and never rose up. Their effeminate host Brian Stelter, asked powder puff questions on Sunday to White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki.

Rather than portraying the media as a credible check on government, Stelter first question to the ginger was what the media "gets wrong" in covering the Biden White House. 

"The White House press secretary faces some unique challenges," Stelter lisped when introducing Jen Psaki, a former CNN contributor.

"Busy summer ahead -- infrastructure, election reform. What does the press get wrong when covering Biden's agenda? When you watch the news, when you read the news, what do you think we get wrong?" Stelter supplicated in the interview.

"Some of our muscles have atrophied," Psaki answered, suggesting that the media has forgotten how long it takes to get legislation passed when criticizing the administration.

"I don't know if that's the press getting it wrong," she said. "I'll leave you to the critique of that, Brian."

Newsbusters news analyst Nicholas Fondacaro called Stelter's opening of the interview "bootlicking," because he could not call it butt kissing as it would get him in trouble with the cancel culture creeps.

"Our corrupt media are absolutely nothing more than propagandists and should be treated as such," Mollie Hemingway, a Fox News contributor said of the interview.

"What a subservient, obsequious question for anyone in media to be earnestly asking the President’s mouthpiece," blogger Erik Soderstrom correctly observed.

In a later exchange, Stelter asked Psaki to provide more advice for journalists, asking her to share guidance for reporters "to stay close to the truth in this world of lies."

WTF???


So much for checks and balances in government. Stelter might as well be working for Pravda or Fars, the Iranian state controlled media. Seriously, what the hell is the difference from that propaganda media if they take its cues from the people they're supposed to be reporting on?

Other questions included, "Five months in, do you feel like that you've made any progress with … defeating the lies?" and "Given the craziness we're seeing from the GOP, what kind of country is this going to be?"

Double WTF!!!

The hardest-hitting question Stelter asked Psaki was why President Biden hasn't held more than one solo press conference, which Psaki did not directly answer, noting that he "takes questions several times a week," that he is notified about in advance because when it comes to advance, that's where you can find his dementia.

Stelter didn't ask about the border crisis or the Fauci email crisis, or the jobs crisis, nor the China crisis.

Stelter's viewership has been sinking faster than a Tootsie Roll in a swimming pool. This May he averaged a mere 836,000 viewers, a 9% drop from April and a 53% drop from January, when Biden slept in the White House.

To Stelter's credit, however, he refused to ask Psaki about Biden's dessert preferences.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against ignorance and evil.


Monday, October 22, 2018

Jim Acosta calls Trump names and mocks Sarah Sanders because he's fairly unbalanced

"Oh my love, my darling, I hunger for my touch"

Dear Diary,

The Comedy News Network's chief White House "correspondent" Jim Acosta dropped the "F" bomb on an ex-Melania Trump staffer on Twitter. He also called our president "dishonest, deceptive" and mocked Press Secretary Sarah Sanders' briefings on Monday at a CNN event in New York.

"I wouldn't put productive and a Sarah Sanders briefing in the same sentence," Acosta said when someone asked him if it's more productive to hear from Sanders or from Trump directly.

That got everybody knee-slapping, chuckling and guffawing as Acosta briefly glanced at his reflection on a nearby window, causing him to run his fingers through his hair and give his head a manly flip.

Some people still believe that Acosta is impartial, and others think he's a journalist. He is neither--he is an opinion scribbler and wouldn't know real journalism from a child's finger painting.

Acosta said that Sanders typically aims to “perform for the president” in order to maintain her own job security, obviously not having a clue as to what the job is of a White House Press Secretary. Her job, like any White House Press Secretary that preceded her, is to cover for the boss.

Acosta was on stage for a discussion moderated by CNN’s breathless Wolf Blitzer and featured New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman and White House Correspondents’ Association president Olivier Knox when the man most admired by himself aired his grievances about covering the Trump administration.

“Many of us didn’t expect Trump to win and it sort of turned the beat upside down,” Acosta pontificated as he checked his manicure. “We need security wherever we go, covering these rallies… you are under attack by the press office of the White House... you sort of have to rise above that and keep plowing through and do your job."

What a freaking hero he is--just ask him.

Trump has correctly called CNN “fake news” and pointed directly at Acosta who is obviously not the world's most honest reporter.

Acosta said he’s been told by many others that Trump’s persona is simply an “act,” and that his supporters don’t realize that when the president refers to news organizations as “fake news” it is simply part of his “shtick.”

But even if it's his "shtick," he's correct. Jim Acosta is not a reporter, he's an opinion guy, and that's what seems to be happening to most of the mainstream media.

“They think he’s deadly serious so they take up the cause and they come after us,” Acosta said. “The United States of America is supposed to be the standard bearer for democratic values all over the world. For the president of the United States to go around calling us ‘fake news’ and the ‘enemy of the people,’ to me, I don’t understand why this is even a debate or a discussion for journalists. It’s just wrong.”

Except that 92 percent of the news about Trump is negative. That's ridiculous, even if you don't agree with his policies or his personality. Let's face it, Trump is by no means a perfect individual but he clearly has gotten some good things done for the country.

Last week, Acosta apologized for saying ‘f-ck you” to a former Melania Trump staffer in a private Twitter message after the chief White House correspondent was widely criticized for the vulgar attack.

Acosta took the opportunity to poke fun at the situation on stage Monday when Blitzer began to speak, took a long, deep breath, then asked how he was doing.

“Occasionally you send a DM and everybody overreacts,” Acosta said trying to minimize his vulgar tweet. Twitter lit up against him.

Acosta, acting as a loudmouth creep, has made a habit of shouting and interrupting when Trump and members of his administration are available to the media.

Maybe it's time to insist CNN find someone who isn't Acosta and who is an actual journalist, but I don't believe they have anyone with those credentials.

Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Sunday, July 23, 2017

Leftists immediately attack Sarah Huckabee Sanders


It didn't take more than a New York microsecond for the liberals to criticize White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders. She is only the third woman ever to be appointed to that post since it began in 1929 but that didn't stop the 'identification party' who pretends to support women and minorities.

Predictably, a number of sexist twits on Twitter tweeted about her physical appearance, which should tell you everything you need to know about them.

"sarah huckabee sanders reminds me of someone that would have pushed me into a locker in middle school" --Talia Lavin (@chick_in_kiev)

I believe Talia Levin was pushed into school lockers many times over in middle school just for being a scumcrumpet. She probably got her fair share of atomic wedgies as well.

If not, she probably deserved them.

"Sarah Huckabee Sanders looks like every woman eating lobster on a cruise ship" --Damien Fahey (@DamienFahey).

Damien evidently spent a lot of time checking out people's plates on cruise ships--maybe it turns him on. But what's really clear is that Damien is a sexist pig, the kind that his liberal goombahs like to label conservatives.

And if Sarah reminds him of "every woman eating lobster" that means she is a good representative of every woman, as opposed to Hillary Clinton who is a good representative of someone who, by being a woman is her biggest accomplishment.

"I think it's, certainly professionally, one of the greatest honors that any person could ever have, to work in any capacity within this building," Sarah said. "And to get to do that up here, in such a public way and speak on behalf of the president is absolutely an honor.

An honor that Talia Levin and Damien Fahey will never know as they ooze envy and sexism in their words.

But it's Mediaite that attacked Huckabee Sanders simply because she's a conservative. They posit that she and the females of "Trumpland" hurt women:

"How Sarah Sanders and the Women of Trumpland Hurt Women (Column by @KylieTCheung)

The article cites Kellyanne Conway, Betsy DeVos and Ivanka Trump claiming the "women of Trumpland all, in some way or another, use their platforms to hurt other women."

"The unfortunate reality is that very few women will ever have the influence of Hillary Clinton, who uses her status as former First Lady and former Secretary of State to sell her influence by securing large donations for her so-called "foundation."

Wait!

Cheung didn't write that. No, the leftist wrote: "The unfortunate reality is that very few women will ever have the influence of Ivanka, who uses her status as First Daughter to promote her brand while exploiting the working mothers of her overseas factories."

Socialists always scream "exploiting" when people who would otherwise starve are given low-paying jobs in which they can eventually grow as evidenced in South Korea, for example.

Cheung blathered on: "Few will ever have the influence of DeVos, who uses her position as education secretary to convene with groups that bully rape victims."

What? Cheung doesn't explain what 'bully rape' means nor give actual examples. DeVos didn't need this job--she is an incredibly wealthy woman and believes strongly in charter schools because they work, in spite of their non-union status. Actually, because of their non-union status.

"And few will ever command the audiences of Conway and Sanders, who use their platforms to deny Trump sexism."

They don't deny Trump's past and never excused it. Cheung must have confused them with the Bill Clinton-era media and his supporters. She must have also confused Conway and Sanders with liberals like Hillary Clinton who support gender-selective abortions that weed out girl babies. Both Conway and Sanders are pro-life.

Supporters of Sarah Huckabee Sanders also tweeted and took swipes at the liberals who insulted her:


"Actually it's feminists who hurt women by their complete obsession with being offended" --Michelle oh (@mkohlrogge)

Another tweeted:

"It is official-Liberals belong to the snarky mean girls club. What hypocrites as the next thing out of their mouth is "anti-bullying" --Linda white (@lwhite3540)

Like the Antifa movement that claims to be against fascism, the hypocrisy of these liberals is just as palpable. 



Monday, January 23, 2017

The softer side of Sean Spicer


The new White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer started off with a little teeny weeny bit of anger in his first encounter with fellow journalists over the weekend, but today was a new day and the first day of the "real" work week.

On his first daily presser he actually picked a reporter from Univision--the Spanish language media outlet that had, in the past, been hostile to President Donald Trump as he campaigned, particularly over his stance on immigration. 

The reporter, Janet Rodriguez, was Spicer's third pick, in fact, after having called upon the New York Post and the Christian Broadcasting Network.

FoxNews.com reported that Spicer's decision to not pick the AP and other front-row outlets for the first questions might have been his way of signaling the press that he might be showing less deference to mainstream news outlets in the briefing.

Rodriguez asked Spicer about former President Obama's actions on children of illegal immigrants (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals aka DACA) and what would be done for recipients. She also asked about the current status of the White House's Spanish website--which was taken down on Inauguration Day as part of the transition to a new website. 

The new White House Press Secretary said that the website may take a bit more time. "Trust me," he said, "it's just going to take a little bit more time, but we're working piece by piece to get that done."

He should have added that the Spanish website will be running without a problem a lot faster than the Obamacare website did.

Insofar as DACA is concerned, Spicer made it clear that President Trump's priority for immigration was to deport criminal illegal aliens first.

"First and foremost, the president's been very, very clear that we need to direct agencies to focus on those who are in this country illegally and have a record--a criminal record or pose a threat to the American people," he said. "That's where the priorities are going to be and then we're going to continue to work through the entire number of folks that are here illegally. But right now the clear focus is on that."

Gee, that sounds like a good idea.

This presser by Spicer was a far less angry one than the very first meeting he had with the press. It seemed like he was going for a "do-over."


Wednesday, November 30, 2016

On OSU attack: "For all we know, it coulda been the Amish"

If we could animate a verbal contortionist he would look like Josh Earnest with his head stuck in his nether regions speaking through his belly button.

"Our response to this situation matters," Earnest said. "If we respond to this situation by casting aspersions on millions of people that adhere to a particular religion or if we increase our suspicion of people who practice a particular religion, we are more likely going to contribute to acts of violence than we are to prevent them."

What a crock.

Nobody should cast aspersions on those who had nothing to do with this jihad attack at Ohio State University. But to pretend it has nothing to do with what it has to do with is stupid, crazy, and suicidal. We cannot preclude examining the ideology and motivation behind these attacks--that's willful ignorance and leaves us even more vulnerable to more of the same.

You must know your enemy to defeat him.

So here we go again--the Obama administration is warning Americans not to cast blame on Muslims after a Muslim launched an attack that was probably inspired by ISIS on Americans.

"Our response to this situation matters," the Press Secretary said at a press briefing. He basically blames our response to these attacks, that is, calling it what it is, on future attacks. But if we sit back and pretend it has nothing to do with jihad, the jihadists will leave us alone.

And how's that working out for the world?

We have been led by idiots for 8 years who thought we were gullible enough to continue on the path to oblivion, all for the sake of political correctness.

This is why Trump won. 

Iran regime's January crackdown murdered 221 children

In late December 2025, economic grievances ignited nationwide protests in the Islamic Republic of Iran that rapidly escalated into systemic...