Declassified 9/11 Docs Reveal Government Had Apparently Heard About Hijacking Thing

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The Trump administration has released a batch of previously classified documents showing that the Clinton and Bush administrations had been warned for years that Al Qaeda was interested in attacking the United States, including the apparently revolutionary concept of hijacking an airplane.

The documents, declassified on the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, reportedly contain more than 100 pages of intelligence briefings seen by Presidents Clinton and Bush between February 1998 and September 2001.

Among the revelations is the stunning discovery that American intelligence agencies had actually received information suggesting that terrorists might use passenger aircraft as weapons.

In other words, the government apparently had some idea that something bad could happen involving airplanes, terrorists, and America.

Unfortunately, the information seems to have remained safely inside the federal government, where intelligence warnings are traditionally placed in a secure location where nobody has to do anything about them.

One 1998 intelligence report warned:

"Reporting suggests Bin Ladin and his allies are preparing for attacks in the US, including an aircraft hijacking to obtain the release of Shaykh 'Umar' Abd al-Rahman, Ramzi Yousef, and Muhammad Sadiq Awda. One source quoted a senior member of the Gama'at al-Islamiyya (IG) saying that as of late October, the IG has completed planning for an operation in the US on behalf of Bin Ladin but that the operation was on hold. A senior Bin Ladin operative from Saudi Arabia was to visit IG counterparts in the US soon thereafter to discuss options—perhaps including an aircraft hijacking."

Apparently, "perhaps including an aircraft hijacking" was intelligence-speak for "there is a possibility that terrorists could hijack an airplane," a concept that would become considerably less hypothetical three years later.

The documents also reportedly stated that:

"IG leader Islambouli in late September was planning to hijack a US airliner during the 'next couple of weeks' to free 'Abd al-Rahman and the other prisoners,"

The same source reportedly warned that:

"Bid Ladin might implement plans to hijack a US aircraft before the beginning of Ramadan on 20 December and that two members of the operational team had evaded security checks during a recent trial run at an unidentified New York airport."

That last detail seems particularly encouraging, since it suggests terrorists were not merely discussing hijacking airplanes over coffee. They were apparently conducting practice runs at American airports.

The documents further warned that members of Bin Ladin's "network" had "received hijack training."

They also said Bin Ladin and his allies "are moving closer to implementing anti-US attacks at unspecified locations, but we do not know whether they are related to attacks on aircraft."

At some point, one imagines, the government had accumulated enough warning signs to fill an entire filing cabinet.

And yet here we are.

On September 11, 2001, 19 Al Qaeda terrorists ultimately hijacked four passenger planes. Two were flown into the World Trade Center in New York City, another struck the Pentagon, and passengers aboard the fourth plane fought back against the hijackers before it crashed in Pennsylvania.

More than 3,000 people were killed.

Among the dead were hundreds of firefighters, police officers, emergency workers, and other first responders who ran toward the danger while everyone else was desperately trying to get away from it.

Twenty-five years later, the release of these documents provides yet another painful reminder that the warning signs were there.

For decades, Americans have debated whether the government knew something was coming, whether intelligence agencies adequately connected the dots, and whether more could have been done to prevent the attacks.

The newly released documents are unlikely to settle every question.

They do, however, provide another remarkable glimpse into the world of pre-9/11 federal intelligence, where warnings about terrorists planning to hijack American aircraft could apparently make it all the way into the President's Daily Brief without making it quite as far as the people who needed to do something about them.

Because apparently the one thing nobody in Washington had thought to classify was the possibility that terrorists might actually mean what they were saying.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Candidate Who Compared 9/11 To COVID Now Says Murdering Innocents Is Bad

LANSING, MI — Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed released a somber 9/11 video Friday after apparently discovering that crashing planes into buildings and killing thousands of Americans is, in fact, a bad thing.

El-Sayed, who hopes to become the first Muslim U.S. senator, told viewers the country should not forget the victims or the first responders who died. In other words, this America-hating slug would say anything to get elected.

The message marked a sharp change from earlier comments in which he compared 9/11 deaths to COVID and warned about “the rise in white supremacist violence.” 

“A cruel act of terror took the lives of more than 3,000 kids, women, men, including brave first responders who ran into the rubble to save lives that day,” El-Sayed said with a forked tongue in the new video. “Thousands more were injured. Many continue to suffer the consequences even today.”

The video arrived as El-Sayed works to put some distance between himself and a pile of old anti-American positions. He has deleted dozens of posts, including 9/11 comments, calls to defund the police, and arguments against the Second Amendment. 

Thus began more BS: “Today, on 9/11, we honor the lives that were taken from us in a terrible act of terrorism. Nothing can justify the murder of innocent civilians, nothing.  And on this day, we mourn the victims, their families, and the destruction those terrorists caused,” El-Sayed added.

That victim-first tone stood in contrast to posts from recent years that he later deleted. Conservative outlet Townhall archived several of them. 

“Today, I mourn the 3K lives, 6K injuries, & infrastructural devastation in NYC, perpetuated ignorantly in the name of my faith. Tomorrow, I’ll mourn ~1M lives, millions of injuries, & infrastructural devastation in 3 countries, perpetuated ignorantly in the name of my country,” he wrote on September 11, 2021. 

On September 11, 2020, he compared the government’s 9/11 response to the COVID-19 pandemic. “19 yrs ago, 2977 lives were taken from us on 9/11. We mourn them. To avenge their deaths, our country launched harmful wars that took lives,” he wrote. 

“Since the #pandemic, we’ve lost the equivalent of 64 9/11s. That’s one EVERY 3.5 DAYS. Why is there no war on #COVID to SAVE lives?” 

That same day he said he “feared” for his family’s safety for the first time on 9/11 and claimed “white supremacist violence” was “blooming” under President Donald Trump after germinating under President George W. Bush.

After more than 3,000 Americans reportedly died of COVID, El-Sayed posted that more lives had been lost than on 9/11.

“I hope that means we’ll spend the next ten years fighting a war for public health & against climate change & poverty… like we launched a global #WaronTerror after 9/11,” he wrote on X. “We could save lives, rather than take them.” 

Campaign aides said the new message reflects growth, maturity, and a sudden realization that Michigan voters can still read the internet. Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers has spent weeks highlighting El-Sayed’s old rhetoric and his close ties to activist and co-Jew hating Hasan Piker, who once said America “deserved 9/11.”

At press time, El-Sayed was said to be reviewing which remaining posts still needed to vanish before November. He is clearly a disgusting piece of human garbage.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

NYPD Commissioner reminds New Yorkers who the heroes were on 9/11

THE LARGE APPLE — New York City Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch appeared to deliver a subtle but unmistakable reminder to Mayor Zohran Mamdani Wednesday that there is, in fact, a difference between the people who attacked New York City and the Americans who ran toward the danger to save their fellow citizens.

Tisch made the apparently controversial observation during the unveiling of a new 9/11 Memorial Wall at One Police Plaza honoring more than 469 NYPD members who have died from illnesses connected to their service following the terrorist attacks.

“Preserving that history also means preserving its moral clarity,” Tisch said. “The men who attacked this city were terrorists. The men and women who ran into the towers to save innocent lives were heroes. Twenty-five years cannot be allowed to blur that distinction and shame on those who do.”

In what must have been an absolutely shocking development for modern New York politics, the police commissioner suggested that terrorists are bad and firefighters, police officers and other first responders are good. 

What an incredible reveal!

Many observers immediately suspected Tisch was speaking directly to Mamdani, despite the fact that she never actually used his name.

“Jessica Tisch said this with Zohran Mamdani sitting beside her. Public officials must show ‘moral clarity’ about 9/11 and never blur the distinction between heroes and terrorists. ‘Shame on those who do.’ She didn’t say his name. She didn’t have to,” former financial exec Sam Antar posted.

The timing was particularly interesting.

Just days earlier, Mamdani had signed official orders designating September 11 as a Day of Remembrance and addressing security concerns ahead of the 25th anniversary events.

Afterward, Mamdani gifted the ceremonial pen to his chief counsel, Ramzi Kassem, who has been directly linked to al-Qaeda terrorists and is considered by many decent patriots to be a scumbag who has no business being within a thousand miles of Ground Zero.

Unfortunately for everyone involved in the ceremony, Tisch happened to be standing between Mamdani and Kassem.

Mamdani therefore first handed the pen to Tisch and asked her to “pass it” to Kassem.

Tisch then reportedly made an abrupt exit from the room, presumably after realizing that New York's latest diversity initiative had somehow become a game of Hot Potato involving a ceremonial pen and an al-Qaeda-linked lawyer. She had another place in mind as to where the pen should be shoved.

Critics immediately accused comrade Mamdani of deliberately creating the bizarre optics and argued that he knew exactly how the gesture would look.

“This childish, calculated display of passive aggression was missed by no one, and will not be forgotten by Tisch or by NYC’s millions of 9/11 survivors,” Fox Business anchor David Asman said.

Matthew Hennessey wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed, “Everyone deserves a lawyer. But by deliberately handing his ceremonial pen to this man, Mr. Mamdani mocked the loss his city suffered on 9/11. And he forced Ms. Tisch to participate in that mockery. He might as well have turned to the cameras and winked.”

Fortunately, Commissioner Tisch apparently decided that 25 years was long enough to remember the basic facts.

The men who flew airplanes into buildings were terrorist scum. 

The people who ran toward those buildings were heroes.

And apparently, in 2026, someone still has to explain the difference.

But you know and Mamdani knows the difference and he seems to be on the side of his 'brothers' who flew into those buildings 25 years ago.

Wake up, America and lose your suicidal empathy, to use the words of the great Gad Saad.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

CBC Orders Reporters to Stop Calling 9/11 Terrorism, Says “Some Very Unfortunate Aviation-Related Things Happened”

Canadian public broadcaster unveils new journalistic standard requiring typists to avoid words that might accidentally describe reality.

TORONTO, Canada — The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation has issued a stern warning to its typists: under no circumstances should they refer to the September 11, 2001 attacks as “terrorist attacks,” because that would risk introducing dangerous quantities of meaning, politics, emotion and, worst of all, facts into the story.

Instead, CBC typists have been instructed to describe 9/11 as “a situation where some folks did stuff in America as a prescient sign that one day Donald Trump would be President.”

The memo, authored by CBC News senior director of journalistic standards and public trust Basem Boshra, was considerably less colorful but no less bewildering.

“Do not refer to the Sept. 11 attacks as terrorist attacks,” the memo said.

The directive instead recommends describing the attacks as hijackings that led to passenger jets crashing in Washington, D.C., Pennsylvania and Manhattan.

The World Trade Center was also destroyed, apparently by forces that CBC typists are not at liberty to characterize.

CBC officials defended the policy by explaining that the word “terrorist” is simply too emotionally loaded.

“It is the practice of the CBC to exercise extreme caution before using the words ‘terrorist’ and ‘terrorism,’” CBC Public Affairs Director Kerry Kelly said.

This is understandable.

After all, imagine the emotional trauma a CBC reporter might experience by typing the words “19 al Qaeda terrorists hijacked four airplanes and deliberately murdered nearly 3,000 people.”

That is an awful lot of adjectives.

Much safer to write:

“Nineteen individuals participated in an aviation-related disagreement that unfortunately resulted in several buildings becoming unavailable for future occupancy.”

CBC editors reportedly rejected the phrase “mass murder” because it was considered “judgmental.”

“Death,” meanwhile, is apparently acceptable because it can happen naturally.

“Premeditated murder” remains under review.

“Islamist terrorism” has been referred to the CBC’s Department of Extremely Careful Feelings.
CBC: We Don’t Call Terrorists Terrorists Because That Would Be Taking Sides

CBC News general manager and editor-in-chief Brodie Fenlon previously explained that the organization prefers to “bear witness” rather than independently determine whether acts are terrorism.

“We bear witness. But CBC News does not itself designate specific groups as terrorists, or specific acts as terrorism, regardless of the region or the events, because these words are so loaded with meaning, politics and emotion that they can end up being impediments to our journalism,” Fenlon said.

Which is an impressive position for a news organization.

It is roughly equivalent to a weather forecaster saying:

“We don't independently designate rain as wet because ‘wet’ is such a loaded term.”

Or a hockey announcer saying:

“We cannot characterize the puck as having entered the net because the phrase ‘goal’ carries political and emotional implications.”

Or a coroner saying:

“We can confirm that the individual is no longer participating in the ongoing experiment known as life.”

The CBC is simply committed to maintaining neutrality.

Even when neutrality requires pretending everyone else hasn't already figured out what happened.
New CBC Style Guide Released

Sources say CBC editors are now considering a comprehensive update to their style guide.

Under the proposed rules:

Terrorist attack: “An event involving unexpected violence.”

Suicide bomber: “A person experiencing a severe disagreement with mortality.”

Hostage-taking: “An involuntary relocation experience.”

Murder: “An unauthorized termination of another person's biological processes.”

Massacre: “A gathering that ended with an unusually high number of people no longer gathering.”

Hamas: “A group whose designation as a terrorist organization should be attributed to Canada, Israel, the United States, Australia, the United Kingdom, Germany, France and approximately half the planet.”

9/11: “The Sept. 11 attacks.”

Actual terrorism: “Please consult Legal.”

The CBC is particularly sensitive about the word “terrorist” because it might imply that someone who deliberately murders civilians for political purposes is, in fact, a terrorist. And once journalists start making those kinds of obvious connections, there is simply no telling where it could lead.

Soon they might start saying that criminals commit crimes.

Or that people who intentionally kill innocent civilians are responsible for killing innocent civilians.

Then civilization itself could collapse.

There is, admittedly, one small problem with the CBC's position. The FBI describes 9/11 as the most lethal terrorist attack in history.

Nineteen al Qaeda terrorists hijacked four airplanes, killed nearly 3,000 people and triggered the largest investigation in FBI history.

Canada itself lists al Qaeda as a terrorist entity and states that the organization perpetrated the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. But CBC journalists remain bravely unwilling to reach the same conclusion without first consulting someone who has already reached it.

This creates the fascinating possibility that a CBC reporter could stand outside the wreckage of a terrorist attack and say:

“According to witnesses, the FBI, the Canadian government, the American government, the Israeli government, the British government and virtually everyone who has ever looked at this event, this may have been terrorism.”

“But I wouldn't want to speculate.”

New York City Councilwoman Vickie Paladino condemned the guidance, accusing the broadcaster of disregarding the victims and deliberately undermining the historical record.

“The CBC guidance is frankly outrageous and insulting, but it stands as a stark warning for what happens when you allow institutions of public trust to be taken over by leftists and foreign interests,” Paladino said.

“This is not merely a callous disregard for the memory of those who perished on 9/11, it is a deliberate effort to undermine the fundamental truth of what happened that day in direct service to Islamism, as Europe, Canada, and the United States become increasingly overwhelmed by Islamist politics. We must not tolerate it any longer and dedicate ourselves to fighting this poison with every tool we have available before it’s too late,” she continued.

Conservative Canadian MP Rachael Thomas called the guidance “absolutely shameful.”

“The CBC is choosing to redefine terrorism in a way that downplays the atrocity of 9/11. Refusing to call it an act of terrorism dishonors the victims, their families, the survivors, and the first responders who witnessed the horrors of that day. 9/11 was an act of terrorism. Full stop,” Thomas said.

The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs likewise accused the CBC of “sanitizing” history and presiding over a “collapse of journalistic standards.”

CBC responded that it was merely following its longstanding policy.

Because apparently the collapse of a building is tragic, but the collapse of a journalistic standard is merely a longstanding practice.

The policy is not limited to 9/11. CBC faced similar criticism following Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023 attack on Israel, when journalists were instructed not to independently call militants or soldiers “terrorists” and instead treat the designation as an attributed opinion.

Which raises an obvious question:

If Hamas murders civilians, kidnaps children, takes hostages and deliberately attacks Israeli communities, when exactly does CBC believe the word “terrorist” becomes appropriate?

Apparently, after the reporter has obtained a notarized affidavit from someone willing to accept responsibility for the adjective.

Perhaps the CBC could establish a new editorial hotline.

CALL 1: “Was someone intentionally trying to terrorize civilians?”

CALL 2: “Did they kill people?”

CALL 3: “Does Canada officially designate the organization as terrorist?”

CALL 4: “Is the answer to all three yes?”

CALL 5: “Sorry, we can't make that determination. Please hold for 45 minutes while we locate a sufficiently neutral adjective.”
CBC's New Definition of Journalism

The CBC's position ultimately leaves Canadians with a remarkable picture of modern journalism.

The journalist sees the plane.

The journalist sees the building.

The journalist sees the fire.

The journalist sees the bodies.

The journalist sees the terrorist organization that planned the attack.

The journalist sees the government's official designation.

The journalist sees the FBI's determination.

And then the journalist looks directly into the camera and says:

“Some things happened.”

This is apparently what “bearing witness” means in Canada.

Not telling people what happened.

Not describing what happened.

Certainly not using words that might help people understand what happened.

Just standing there solemnly while history happens nearby.

And if anyone asks whether 9/11 was terrorism, the answer is simple:

According to the FBI, yes.

According to the Canadian government, yes.

According to the historical record, yes.

According to the victims, their families and the first responders, obviously yes.

According to the CBC?

“The Sept. 11 attacks.”

Because apparently after 25 years, nearly 3,000 deaths, four hijacked aircraft and the destruction of the World Trade Center, the most dangerous thing about 9/11 is still the possibility that a CBC reporter might accidentally call a terrorist a terrorist.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Curtis Sliwa Tells 9/11 Families to Stop Being ‘Sore Losers’ Over Mamdani

Happy faces

Apparently, the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks now comes with a new rule: You are allowed to remember the nearly 3,000 Americans murdered by Islamist terrorists, but apparently not to complain about the Islamist mayor attending the ceremony.

Former mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa told relatives of 9/11 victims Thursday to “stop being sore losers” after some families launched a petition urging New York City Mayor, comrade Zohran Mamdani, to stay away from this year’s Ground Zero commemoration.

“He’s the mayor. Stop being sore losers!” Sliwa told reporters Thursday. “You knew this is Zohran Mamdani. He was never a fake, phony, fraudulent, fugazi like a lot of politicians. He told you who he was.”

That is certainly one way to put it. 

Some relatives of the victims of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks have backed a petition asking Mamdani not to attend the ceremony marking the 25th anniversary of the attacks, which killed 2,977 people.

Giovanni Galante, whose 29-year-old wife, Grace Catherine Galante, was killed on 9/11 and who helped organize the petition, accused Mamdani of failing to “meaningfully acknowledge the horror” of the attacks and associating with people who have minimized them. 

[In fact, on the day of the Oct. 7, 2023 attack on Israel, Mamdani's wife, Rama Sawaf Duwaji, like a post from The Slow Factory account that included images from the assault. It showed a bulldozer breaching the Gaza-Israel barrier and terrorists on a captured IDF vehicle. An overlaid text of the image said: "Resisting apartheid since 1948," and "Systemic change for collective liberation." The next day, she like posts from The People's Forum (associated with Times Square protests involving Democratic Socialists of America and their buddies.) These promoted standing with "Palestinian resistance," along with the "from the river to the sea" slogan. In February 2024, after a NY Times investigation into sexual violence during the attack, Duwaji liked a post referring to reports of Hamas rapes as a "mass rape" hoax that was "fabricated" by The Times. Mamdani never condemned his wife's words.]

Cheri Sparacio, whose husband, Thomas, was also killed on 9/11, pointed to Mamdani’s association with left-wing scum-streamer Hasan Piker, who said in 2019 that “America deserved 9/11” before having to later apologize.

Mamdani has said he plans to attend the September 11 ceremony anyway, his way of doxing them.

Sliwa, who ran against Mamdani and former Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo as the Republican candidate in last year’s mayoral election, said families have every right to dislike the mayor, but apparently the mayoral chair now comes with a complimentary halo.

Sliwa called the petition effort ridiculous. Sliwa is wrong.

“Once he got elected, you should have known he was going to be there at 9/11,” Sliwa said. “Now, if you choose to turn your back on him, I don’t want to ever tell family members what they should be doing on this holiday, not holiday, but this solemn occasion, that’s your choice.

“But I believe you respect the office,” he continued. “He’s the mayor. He’s representing the city.”

Why? Why must we 'respect the office' if the person in office is a socialist-Islamist who apparently plans to ruin the city's economy with his communist ideas? Maybe respecting the office means going after the person who is degrading the office. 

Sliwa also revisited an embarrassing moment from the closing days of the 2025 mayoral campaign involving Cuomo and radio host Sid Rosenberg.

Rosenberg joked with Cuomo, who was running as an independent, that Mamdani would cheer for the terrorists if another September 11 attack occurred while he was mayor. Cuomo chuckled before replying, “That’s another problem.”

Sliwa said the remark hurt Cuomo at precisely the moment when his campaign had begun gaining momentum.

“He was gaining traction, and then he made that stupid remark and then didn’t handle it well,” Sliwa said. “And then Zohran exploited the hell out of it, as he should.”

“That was Islamophobic,” Sliwa added.

So, in the strange political universe of New York City, the 9/11 anniversary has somehow become a referendum on Islamophobia, mayoral etiquette and whether grieving families are sufficiently respectful of the office.

Meanwhile, the families who actually lost loved ones on September 11 apparently get to choose between keeping quiet and being labeled “sore losers.”

What a country. What a crazy take by a guy who's lost my respect.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

THE LATEST ON RUDY GIULIANI'S CONDITION

Former New York City Mayor [aka 'America's Mayor'] Rudy Giuliani, 81, is currently hospitalized with pneumonia in Florida's Good Samaritan Medical Center, in West Palm Beach. The hospitalization was announced on Sunday, May 3rd.

Ted Goodman, his spokesman, confirmed May 4th that Giuliani was placed on a ventilator due to complications from pneumonia, and it had worsened by restrictive airway disease linked to the 9/11 exposure at the World Trade Center attack by Islamic terrorists.

At this time, the former mayor is breathing on his own and has his family and primary medical provider at his side.

As mentioned, the pneumonia was exacerbated due to prior respiratory issues and he sounded hoarse during his online show on Friday.

Giuliani experienced a serious car accident in September 2025 that resulted in a fractured vertebra and other injuries.

Goodman said that Giuliani is "a fighter" and asked the public for prayers. Some scumcrumpets online have expressed a sick glee that he might perish--this is what our country has come to and it's far worse by those on the left.

President Trump and many others, including this writer, wish him well.

There is no further public information as to his condition but let's hope he recovers.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. Finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Republican beats Democrat in deep blue state after his social media history gets uncovered

A Republican pulled off a genuine shocker in deep-blue Northern Virginia on Tuesday, snagging a county-level seat that nobody saw coming after the Democrat nominee's ancient social media skeletons came tumbling out of the closet.

Jeannie LaCroix, 64, won the special election for a Prince William County Board of Supervisors seat, beating Democrat Muhammed Sufiyan Casim, 36, a Muslim Pakistani immigrant. The turning point? Revelations that Casim, back in his 20s in the 2010s, had posted a bunch of racist, misogynist, and antisemitic stuff online, as Potomac Local News laid out.

Casim tried to clean it up in an interview with the Prince William Times. "I wasn’t realizing the cultural weight and the context, so I used that word foolishly, but not in a derogatory or prejudicial way," he said, explaining that he had used the N-word to refer to his black friend. "Back in those days, a lot of kids would use that word both with kids of African American origin and people of any brown ethnicity." He also suggested he had just been copying the behavior of "kids" of "brown ethnicity" at the time.

In a March 2 X post where he confirmed he wasn't dropping out, Casim went the victim route, blaming the rhetoric of the former Republican chairman of the Board (who left office seven years ago) for emboldening neo-Nazis, then adding, "As a Muslim-American who has experienced what it’s like to live in America after 9/11, discussions around cultural sensitivity are very important to me."

LaCroix took 43.7% of the vote to Casim's 37%, with write-ins grabbing 19.2%, per the Prince William County Office of Elections via Potomac Local News. The Republican rode the wave of a fractured Democratic side. Pamela Montgomery, who lost the primary to Casim, jumped in as a write-in just a week before Election Day because of those decade-old posts. She even led in fundraising despite the late start.

"For Democrats, confronting racism is not optional. It is foundational," Montgomery, who is Black, wrote in a letter published by the Prince William Times on Election Day. "When racist language surfaces, especially from someone seeking public office, the response should be clear: acknowledge it, condemn it, and demand accountability."

This race filled the vacancy left by Democrat Margaret Franklin, who resigned after winning a Virginia House of Delegates seat in January. Franklin had crushed Casim in the Dem primary for that state House spot by more than 2-to-1.

Prince William County is the kind of affluent, diverse D.C. suburb that Democrats usually own. Kamala Harris carried it by 18 points in 2024, and Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger won it by 34 points in November 2025. The northeastern precincts around Woodbridge are some of the bluest in the whole county, per 2024 VoteHub data.

LaCroix's win stands out as one of the rare flips from blue to red in a special election during President Donald Trump's second term. Meanwhile, over the past year, Democrats have been flipping multiple state legislative seats in areas Trump carried by double digits in 2024.

Sometimes the past really does refuse to stay buried, especially when it's dumb stuff someone posted online in their 20s. And sometimes voters decide that "I was young and foolish" doesn't quite cut it when you're running for office. Who knew accountability could swing both ways?

Thanks for following Brain Flushings, guys. Please consider subscribing, and if you would like to support my work, visit the sponsors on this page, or you can Buy Me A Coffee. 

Tweet

Vueling pilot who ordered Jewish children off plane trained 9/11 Islamic jihadis

Human poo 

Let's pause to consider the grotesque absurdity of this tale, one that could only unfold in our age of moral confusion, depravity, and institutional cowardice. A pilot, Captain Ivan Chirivella of Vueling Airlines, once described Mohamed Atta and Marwan Al Shehhi, yes, those scumbags, the butchers of 9/11, as "normal lads." Normal, that is, except for their "sexist" attitudes, though apparently they "never said anything bad about the US."

 How comforting. These "normal lads," let us not forget, went on to pilot American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175 into the Twin Towers, murdering 2,753 souls in an act of barbarism that shook the civilized world. And yet, this same Chirivella, a man who trained these monsters, was last week commanding a flight in Valencia, where he saw fit to have 50 Jewish children, youngchildren, mind you, aged 10 to 15, ejected from the Vueling Airline plane.

Picture the scene: these youngsters, fresh from a summer camp in Spain, board Vueling flight VY8166, bound for Paris. They take their seats, some humming Hebrew songs, as children do, full of life and innocence. The crew, apparently affronted by this display of cultural identity, warns them to stop. The children, obediently, comply, as confirmed by Karine Lamy, a mother whose child was among them, in an interview with i24NEWS. But compliance was not enough. 

Minutes later, the Spanish Civil Guard storms aboard, as though these children posed some existential threat. The camp’s 21-year-old director is handcuffed in front of her charges, while passengers are ordered to place their phones on the ground, lest they document this outrage. The footage, mercifully, escaped, spreading across social media like a flare in the dark.

The authorities claim 44 minors and eight adults were removed, the camp director having "refused to get off the plane and obey the officers." She was later released, no charges filed, which rather undermines the narrative of her supposed intransigence. Vueling, ever eager to deflect, issued a bullcrap statement claiming the group had tampered with emergency equipment and ignored crew instructions, engaging in "highly disruptive behavior" that endangered the flight. Oh, and they were quick to add, with the sanctimonious tone of a corporation caught in the act, that they "categorically reject any form of discrimination without exception." 

How noble. Yet when pressed about Chirivella’s identity, they confirmed he was the captain, born in the Canary Islands, 1976, a man of 12,500 flight hours, but conveniently omitted his starring role in the prequel to September 11 and how he trained the anal sphincters pictured below.

For it was Chirivella, as the Telegraph uncovered, who trained Atta and Al Shehhi at Jones Aviation Academy in Florida in 2000. He even penned a book in 2003, Innocent Accomplice, reflecting on his time with these “normal lads.” Normal, perhaps, until they were expelled from the academy for harassing female staff and falsifying documents—minor peccadilloes, apparently, for men who would soon commit mass murder. After the towers fell, the FBI came knocking, and Chirivella complained to El Mundo that he and others were treated "unfairly." Poor soul. Since 2006, he has flown for Vueling, moonlighting as a flight instructor, shaping the next generation of aviators. One wonders what lessons he imparts.

This is not merely a story of one man’s dubious past. It is a damning indictment of a world that allows such a figure to wield authority over Jewish children, to have them marched off a plane under armed guard for the crime of singing. It is a world where the memory of 9/11 grows faint, where the dots between past and present are left unconnected, and where the innocent are punished while the culpable carry on. If this does not stir your outrage, what will?

Hey fellow patriots, if you enjoy my content, I hope you'll consider supporting Brain Flushings with a small donation to Buy Me a Coffee. It keeps me going and fuels my late-night writing sessions with fresh ideas. Let's keep the good vibes brewing!

Tweet

Traitor Joe "set to free" 9/11 hijacker and flip off the dead Americans

Our house plant in the White House has gone too far this time. It's bad enough he can't complete a full sentence without screwing it up, and that he lies with every breath he takes. Now this garbage of a president has scheduled to free the 9/11 terrorist who missed United Airlines Flight 93 in which four of his terrorist buddies intended to fly into a Pentagon.

Mohammed al-Qahtani has been incarcerated in Guantanamo Bay for the past 19 years because he missed out on being a martyr by killing as many Americans as possible.

Biden has angered and shocked leading GOP legislators. But why shock when you consider the source: a brain addled, lying, un-American politician who can't tell his wife from his sister. This decision is the worst possible move that will show the world what wusses we are, and how our country has dishonored the memories of our dead.

The reason al-Qahtani couldn't fulfill his evil mission was only due to the fact that he was denied entry into the US on that fateful day in 2001. So now he will be released from Gitmo and moved to the friendly sands of Saudi Arabia. [It's doubtful that he'd get the Jamal Khashoggi treatment there. They might even treat him like a freaking hero.]

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia will put the scumbag into a custodial program and psychological wellness care program--kind of like a 12-step program for jihadis. "Hello, my name is Mohammed and I'm a terrorist."

The recidivism rate in that program is about 100%, so good luck.

The Left hates, hates, hates America. 

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL) lead Republican on the House Armed Services Committee described Biden's move as a shocking capitulation to the Left. But let's face it, Biden is a sock puppet with Ron Klain's hand up his butt making all the moves. Unless, of course, it's Obama.

Rogers said that allowing al-Qahtani to walk free is a horrifying decision. Then he recounted how Al-Qaeda killed about 3,000 Americans.

The Democrats are terrorist appeasers and they even have a few in their party who are quite open about it [their names rhyme with Billhan Gomar and Ratbeetah Pahleeb].

Tweet

Kamala Hahaharris compares Jan. 6 to bombing of Pearl Harbor and 9/11

There is no other way to say it so here goes: our Vice President, Kamala Harris, is an idiot. 

She is an idiot because anyone who believes the American people could be convinced that the event that took place last January 6th at the U.S. Capitol was comparable to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which dragged us into the Second World War, and September 11, 2001, when thousands of people were killed as Islamic jihadis flew planes into the World Trade Center buildings, the Pentagon, and attempted to fly one into the White House but was thwarted, must be dumber than those she's trying to convince.

Harris marked the Jan. 6 anniversary of the Capitol riot with those comparisons. In effect, this our idiot VP has minimized actual tragedies with a bunch of people who were dissatisfied with the 2020 election procedures, and were protesting what they believe was a fraudulent result. Some of the rioters were armed, some engaged with the police, but most were too busy taking photos of the scene, talking on their phones, or simply walking around and checking things out. While Pearl Harbor and 9/11 were horrific events with horrible consequences, Jan. 6 was only a horrible consequence for a young lady named Ashli Babbitt.

Babbitt was unarmed and entering the Capitol building through a window when a Capital Police Officer shot and killed her for no other apparent reason. Babbitt was a military veteran, married, and may have been wrong to do what she did, but killing her was senseless and totally unjustified. In spite of that, the cop who shot her, Michael Byrd, was fully exonerated. 

Meanwhile, scores of people who participated at the Capitol that day are in jail with no formal charges leveled against them, and no bail offered. They are political prisoners, plain and simple and this should worry all Americans, left and right.

But here was Harris calling for legislation to "protect democracy." Speaking through her nostrils she said that,  “Certain dates echo throughout history, including dates that instantly remind all who have lived through them where they were, and what they were doing, when our democracy came under assault.”

“Dates that occupy not only a place on our calendars, but a place in our collective memory. December 7th, 1941, September 11th, 2001, and January 6th, 2021,” she bulls***ted. Then she warned us how fragile American democracy is.

“On Jan. 6, we all saw what our nation would look like if the forces who seek to dismantle our democracy are successful. The lawlessness. The violence. The chaos,” Harris said from the Capitol building. “What was at stake then, and now, is the right to have our future decided the way the Constitution prescribes it: By we, the people.”

She was able to keep a serious face and did not laugh even once over the irony of her words.

The lawlessness? The left wants to defund the police, impose bail reform that would have violent offenders back out on the street in a revolving door policy, and make armed crimes misdemeanors. 

“The violent assault that took place here, the very fact of how close we came to an election overturned, that reflects the fragility of democracy,” Harris honked.

And if you want an election overturned and have the will of the people destroyed, do what the Democrats are asking for: eliminate voter ID [because minorities and people of color are incapable of getting IDs] and get rid of mail-in voting. 

How many Democrats would be willing to put a thousand dollars in an envelope, address it to themselves, and put it in their local mailbox? The problem with that is no different than mail-in voting.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Harris was quickly blasted on social media.

Washington Examiner’s Jerry Dunleavy explained that Harris’s comparison was “obviously” baseless and he tweeted:

The Capitol riot was bad, political violence is wrong, & people are being prosecuted for it. It wasn’t comparable to Pearl Harbor (2,403 sailors, soldiers, & civilians killed by the Japanese Empire) nor comparable to 9/11 (2,977 Americans & others killed by Al-Qaeda). Obviously.

— Jerry Christmas 🎄🎅🏽 (@JerryDunleavy) January 6, 2022

John Cardillo replied:

9/11: 2977 innocents dead

Pearl Harbor: 2403 Americans dead

Jan 6th: One death. Unarmed #AshliBabbitt killed by an inept Capitol cop, @KamalaHarris’s comparison is disgraceful and insults the memories of those we lost.

— John – Naturally Immune – Cardillo (@johncardillo) January 6, 2022

Harris asserted that in order to protect the will of the people, and the right to vote in America, Congress should pass voting rights bills before the Senate. Prior to her bloviating, Senate Majority Leader Chuck "Nostrils" Schumer (D-NY) threatened to change Senate rules if Republicans didn't vote the way he wanted them to, which was to favor that Democratic-favoring legislation.

Daily Wire's Ben Shapiro succinctly tweeted in response:

That’s the game! https://t.co/ELS5JFR3j6

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) January 6, 2022

I would go out on a limb and say that January 6, 2020 was as bad as Watergate, but probably not worse. Kamala Harris and Joe Biden, on the other hand, are both worse than Watergate.

Tweet

Chief Sniffing Chicks calls for unity in prerecorded 9/11 message to nation

Acting President Joe Biden [his Indian name is "Chief Sniffing Chicks"] released a video on September 10th containing his purported reflections on the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, an act so terrible to Democrats that it is only second to the January 6, 2021 Capitol Hill incursion in which a woman was killed by Metro Police officer Michael Byrd, who imagined all 5 foot 2 inches of the victim, Ashli Babbitt, as a threat to the integrity, democracy and survival of the nation. 

Ms. Babbitt, a military veteran, was unarmed.

The video by the barely sentient Biden laughingly insisted that "national unity" is America's "greatest strength." As Biden likes to claim, he wasn't joking.

Aside from telling 80 million unvaccinated Americans that it is their COVID pandemic because for whatever their reasons refuse to get the vaccine, the Biden-Harris etc. administration is bringing unity to the country. 

Aside from calling out only Republican governors over the COVID count and not mentioning the higher per capita numbers in New Jersey and New York, first and second in deaths respectively, the co-presidents are making us one great nation.

Even putting aside the fact that when former president Trump was in office the comedy team of Biden and Harris [her Indian name is "Laughing Beaver"] said that they wouldn't take the vaccine if Trump okayed it, we know they see us a one nation indivisible.

And in spite of the fact that the mandates on businesses of 100 or more employees will be fined $1,400 for every employee for each day they refuse to take the vaccine, or if the company refuses to test them weekly at $50 a test per person, we know the Biden-Harris debacle of an administration isn't trying to punish small businesses, while big businesses that can afford the testing, will thrive.

But Biden's prerecorded speech [because an actual live speech is too risky when the number of your active brain cells wouldn't be enough to make a basketball team] emphasized unity:

"To the families of the 2,977 people from more than 90 nations killed on September 11, 2001, in New York City, Arlington, Va., and Shanksville, Pa., and the thousands of more that were injured, America commemorates you and your loved ones.

"We honor all those who risked and gave their lives in the minutes, hours, months, and years afterward. 

"Unity is what makes us who we are, America at its best. To me, that's the central lesson of September 11th."

For this crap-show of an administration, unity means agreement with the Left's message. If you disagree you're a racist, a white supremacist [regardless if you are Larry Elder] and you need to be punished for your difference of an opinion.

The central message of 9/11 isn't about unity; the message is that when we are attacked, we fight back until we have stopped the enemy of our great nation cold in its tracks. The central message is that we don't leave Americans and our friends to fend for themselves with a common enemy. We don't hand over a victory to terrorists like this crap-show of an administration just did. Unity comes with the territory.

Biden is an embarrassment.

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

Tweet

Student senator removes American flags from 9/11 memorial

Washington University in St. Louis has produced a Muslim student who was caught in the act of removing American flags from a 9/11 memorial and stuffing them in trash bags. This disgusting act took place on Sept. 11th, the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on our nation, and was posted in a video by Young Americans for Freedom. 

The memorial is part of YAF's 9/11: Never Forget Project and consisted of 2,977 flags placed on Mudd Field at the school. The flags represent each of the victims murdered on that horrific day at the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and on United Flight 93.

This piece of human waste, Fadel Alkilani, is vice president of finance for the student union. And because this scumbag lives in the United States of America and not in some theocratic Islamic country, he was correct when he said, "I did not violate any university or legal policy" adding, now go away."

A member of the WU College Republicans, Nathaniel Hope, filmed the video, and said that Alkilani showed "no remorse."

The POS later deleted his Twitter account after trying to justify his desecration of the victims of the Islamic terrorist attacks, calling his behavior a "protest against American imperialism and the 900,000 lives lost as a result of post 9/11 war."

But he whined  about being condemned for removing the American flags from the 9/11 memorial on Instagram. 

"Republicans attacking me in the replies," Alkilani wrote on his Instagram, referring to a post from Washington University in St. Louis about the 9/11 memorial. But the page is no longer available.

"Republicans are coming for me for real," he said in another Instagram story. Sorry kid, they're just doing a 'Maxine Waters' on your sorry ass.

Alkilani made a typical leftist-style attempt, using verbal contortions to defend his actions, calling it a "flag relocation incident." We should be relocating flags up his nether regions. The scumcrumpet claimed that he had "no intention of removing the flags from the Mudd Field area."  Then he had the audacity of dope to claim that he planned to leave the flags in trash bags on the field along with "various statistics explaining the human cost of 9/11 in the past 20 years."

According to Fox News, Alkilani along with other anti-American students tried to destroy the memorial on Friday night but was stopped by campus police.

Julie Flory, Washington University in St. Louis Vice Chancellor for Marketing and Communications, provided a statement to Student Life, the university's student newspaper:

"We were disappointed to learn about the disruption to the 9/11 display on Mudd Field. We condemn the interference with the expression of support by the College Republicans for the victims of the national tragedy that took place 20 years ago today."

College Republicans president junior Nick Rodriguez said Alkilani "made a mockery of one of the most somber days in American history," and should be disciplined.

"At minimum, I believe he should be removed from both SU and his [resident advisor] position, as what does it say to be a top American institution, and have yourself represented by a student leader who has no respect for property, campus traditions or the remembrance of thousands of lost lives," Rodriguez said in a statement. "Today is about remembering the tragedy, 20 years ago to the day, not to make a political statement. Any reason he can conjure to remove the flags I find ludicrous."

Some might say that Alkilani should be sent to an Islamic theocratic country for a year to work on his sharia law and Koranic studies. This might enlighten him about the freedoms he enjoys in the best nation on Earth.

Washington University in St. Louis officials have declined to say whether Alkilani would be disciplined, which speaks volumes about what is happening in our institutions of "higher learning."

Today is September 12th. Perhaps all Americans need to remember how we came together as Americans on that day 20 years ago and keep a watchful eye on those who would scoff at that notion.

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

Tweet

Virginia Ed Dept. tells teachers to avoid teaching about the Islamic extremism of 9/11

The Virginia Department of Education has become an oxymoron because it refuses to educate students on a particular topic that is relevant to understanding the motivation behind the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The department hosted a speaker who instructed teachers to avoid talking about the role Islamic extremism played in the suicide attacks that took the lives of nearly 3,000 individuals. 

The person who delivered the PowerPoint presentation by "Education Leadership scholar" Amaarah DeCuir, instructed to teachers to avoid using language that could [accurately] blame the events of 9/11 on Muslim extremists, people willing to die for Islam in order to forward this geopolitical religion. DeCuir pointed to the heightened anti-Muslim sentiment that allegedly increases around the anniversary of the Islamic terrorist attacks.

“School and classroom 9/11 commemorations are sites for increased anti-Muslim racism,” her presentation reads. “This year’s 20th anniversary commemorations will likely result in heightened risks of racist discourse, threats, and violence targeting Muslim students in schools and society. Educators are well-positioned to disrupt these risks by centering the socio-emotional needs of Muslims in their commemoration plans.”

DeCuir created a list of teaching standards that are “in” and “out,” according to her radical, anti-American viewpoints. 

Teaching standards that are “in” include “acknowledgment of anti-Muslim racism.” Teaching standards that are “out” include the “false assumption of Muslim responsibility for 9/11” and “American exceptionalism.” 

Of course, the truth is extremism and hatred for the West was and is the catalyst for terrorism, but DeCuir, with her twisted logic, would have us believe that the Muslims responsible for the attack were the victims of the event and the dead Americans were somehow responsible for their own fates. This is reminiscent of critical race theory which is both anti-American and racist.

The presentation gave examples of “harmful teaching” about 9/11. She gave examples that included “creating a tense classroom environment,” “reducing 9/11 instruction to death counts and fear mongering,” “assumptions of emotional distance,” “teaching about Islam and/or Muslims,” “amplifying the extremists and extremist acts of 9/11,” “demanding the condemnation of 9/11,” “failing to respond to anti-Muslim racism,” and “reproducing a single, American narrative that marginalizes other students.”

What happened twenty years ago this Saturday was tense and while the death counts in the three terrorist scenes was almost 3,000, it was only a fraction of what is known about that day. People trapped above the floors where the two planes hit had no chance of escape and many died jumping from the upper floors to escape the horrific heat--some held hands as they jumped together.

While it's said repeatedly, most Muslims are not terrorists, but all of the terrorists on 9/11 were Muslims, and all were performing Islamic jihad and were willing to die in order to practice this part of the religion of Islam. How can we not amplify the extremist acts of 9/11 when this ideology is still being practiced today, as it has been since Mohammad married a 6-year-old girl named Aisha?

And anti-Muslim "racism" isn't a thing because Islam isn't a race. But putting that aside, the larger problem isn't "islamophobia" [a term originally capitalized on by Muslim think tanks in order to shut the mouths of those people opposing the geopolitical side of Islam and its global jihad] the larger problem in the United States is anti-Semitism. In fact, it's on top of the hate crime list.

Even Democrats refuse to address the anti-Zionist/anti-Semitic rhetoric on Capitol Hill by such congresspeople as Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), Cori Bush (D-MO), and Ayanna Pressley (D-OH). 

Below is the FBI's 2019 listing of religious hate crimes in the United States:

60.2 percent were victims of crimes motivated by offenders’ anti-Jewish bias.
13.2 percent were victims of anti-Islamic (Muslim) bias.
3.8 percent were victims of anti-Catholic bias.
3.8 percent were victims of anti-Other Christian bias.
3.5 percent were victims of anti-Sikh bias.
2.9 percent were victims of anti-Eastern Orthodox (Russian, Greek, Other) bias.
2.6 percent were victims of bias against groups of individuals of varying religions (anti-multiple religions, group).
1.4 percent were victims of anti-Protestant bias.
0.9 percent (15 individuals) were victims of anti-Mormon bias.
0.4 percent (7 individuals) were victims of anti-Jehovah’s Witness bias.
0.4 percent (7 individuals) were victims of anti-Hindu bias.
0.3 percent (6 individuals) were victims of anti-Atheist/Agnostic bias.
0.3 percent (5 individuals) were victims of anti-Buddhist bias.
6.3 percent were victims of bias against other religions (anti-other religion).

So while DeCuir tries to depict Muslims as the largest victim group of hate crimes, the numbers don't lie.

According to her biography from American University, DeCuir is an education scholar who “focuses on the intersections of leadership, gender, and diverse cultural contexts to advance social justice.” In a tweet about the event, she called on “antiracist” educators to join and “disrupt” the current education of 9/11.

The term 'antiracist' means 'racist.' The term 'disrupt' the current education of 9/11, means to 'withhold information in order to foster a false narrative. This again is perfectly aligned with critical race theory and is a danger to the country as it is designed to undermine our basic principles and freedoms.

DeCuir had previously thanked the Michigan-based Institute for Social Policy and Understanding (ISPU), a Muslim interest group endorsed by Rashida Tlaib, an anti-Semite and a Hamas supporter. DeCuir once tweeted:

“My work would not be possible without the amazing research from [ISPU]! Thank you for your support,”

Tlaib also endorses the organization for its "profound" work.

Virginia State Senator Steve Newman (R) condemned the bullcrap presentation and called on educators state-wide to teach “the facts.” What a concept. 

“I lived through 9/11… This one event was due to Muslim extremists and their actions, the desire of these individuals to kill as many Americans as possible at one time. Why do we need to change history, again? Just tell the facts,” Newman said. “We have a responsibility to our children today to ensure they know the awful truth about the events of that day, and the evil intent behind the terrorists … We must teach the next generation the truth about our history.”

And lest we forget, it was Ilhan Omar who once dubbed the terrorism of 9/11 as “some people [that] did something.”

Hopefully your September 11, 2021 will be a day of reflection and a peaceful day overall. 

I still remember the burnt office papers that ended up on my Brooklyn roof on that sunny Tuesday twenty years ago. And I learned a lot about the so-called 'religion of peace' afterward.

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

Tweet

Yemeni groceries to boycott NY Post in support of Omar's minimizing 9/11

Yemeni grocery stores in New York are planning to boycott the NY Post and to close in protest over Trump's quoting Ilhan Omar's statement about the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in which she described it as "some people did something."

So the brilliant Yemeni businessmen plan to close their stores and thumb their beards and noses at Trump and not do any business until he says he's sorry to her. No matter how long it takes. No matter how much business they lose, they're not going to allow Trump to win this battle. One owner even volunteered to cut off several toes in protest. Another anonymous Yemenite promised to never get off of Welfare, which he laughed and said he wasn't really planning to do anyway.

The Yemeni American Merchants Association (YAMA) announced this week its push to have thousands of New York City's bodegas boycott the New York Post after the paper published a front page rebuking Rep. Ilhan Omar's comments about the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Actually, they mostly quoted her own words--nothing needed to be rebuked--it was a given, especially when the paper also posted a photo of the Twin Towers ablaze after the planes, flown by Islamic jihadis, did their destruction.

In a letter, the organization wrote that the criticism that the Minnesota Democrat faces over the comments incite divisiveness and vitriolic invective against Muslims in the U.S., adding that New York as a community should not stand for that kind of religious attack.

Bull crap. It wasn't a religious attack at all by Trump, but I can't say the same for the 9/11 attacks.

“This rhetoric threatens the safety and well-being of Omar, Muslim leaders, and the larger Muslim American community at a time when Islamophobia is at an all-time high," the organization wrote in the letter.

Bull crap. Islamophobia is not at an all-time high. Anti-Semitism is at an all-time high if you go by something called facts.

We have come to a point where, if you speak out against an elected official, you are labeled a racist, bigot, Islamophobe. That is un-American and shuts down free speech. And speech is not violence, as the left would have you believe when it comes from someone with whom they disagree.

It wasn't Trump who spread hateful rhetoric--it's Ilhan Omar and others in her party. She has been getting away with her anti-American, anti-Semitic statements for a long time. She is a despicable person. But my calling her that is not a call for violence against her--she has the right to be a despicable POS and no conservative would ever think of wreaking violence against her for what she says.

I can't say the same for the left anymore.

If anyone is okay with this, they are probably a Democrat and a hypocrite all rolled up into one.



Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet