Biden, Biuttigieg and Bernie would have let Soleimani live and prosper

Dems: "An austere, religious man"

The "Three BB's": Biden, Buttigieg and Bernie said at the 8th Democratic Debate on ABC that they all would have allowed Iran's top terrorist Cassem Soleimani to live and prosper if any of them were the president of the United States because while he is the mastermind behind thousands of deaths, many which were Muslim, he seemed kind of austere and religious with a Sean Connery kind of look.

"Oy think he had nice eyes," Bernie Sanders said, referring to the man who, since 1998 commanded Iran's Quds Force (IRGC-QF), the terror arm of the regime tasked with planning and executing terror and military operations beyond Iran's borders.

Monica Hernandez asked Senator Sanders: What if he didn't have nice eyes--would you have then droned him?"

Sanders replied, "Only if he was getting funded by Wall Shhtreet bankers or other billionaires. I would also have drone them to, dammit." [Sanders stopped using 'millionaires' as evil, greedy, corrupt people once it went public that he's also a millionaire.]

"He posed no immediate danger to the United States," said Pete Buttigieg about the man whose Quds Force fueled destabilizing sectarian conflicts throughout the Middle East for decades and continues to wage a campaign of terrorism, assassinations, and violence.

ABC Moderator George Stephanopoulos asked Buttigieg, "If Soleimani posed a threat to your husband, would you have then droned him?"

"George, as much as I hate to say it, yes. Nobody screws with my husband," Buttigieg said emphatically.

Biden's response was slightly less controversial: "You know Muslims don't pray in churches like Christians," Joe said. "They use those round things called mosques. There are lots of mosques in the United States and as I stand here in Idaho, I plan to help all illegal immigrants." Turning to Adam Sexton of WMUR Biden smiled and added, "And you, young man, have a very sexy name. It reminds me of a ton of sex. Get it?"

Soleimani directed and guided the IRGC-QF terrorist attacks across six continents and inside the United States and his organization has been designated Soleimani as a Specially-Designated Global Terrorist. As Quds leader, Soleimani was directly responsible for arming, funding, and training proxy groups in Iraq, Syria, Bahrain, Lebanon, Yemen, and Afghanistan for starters.

"Cowabonga"

Operations carried out by the proxy groups have led to the deaths and suffering of TENS OF THOUSANDS, including hundreds and hundreds of Americans, civilian men, women and children included.

If anyone on planet Earth deserved to be "put down like a dog," Cassem Soleimani was the guy.

Even right before his death, orders given by that scumbag escalated Iran's campaign of violence and terrorism against Americans and our interests in the Middle East. He orchestrated a series of attacks against American forces in Iraq in the past several months, culminating in the rocket attack on December 27, 2019, which resulted in the death of an American citizen, wounded four American service members, and threatened the lives of many more American personnel, the State Department asserts.

"It was unfair. Soleimani wasn't such a bad guy
until Trump made him a bad guy"

General Soleimani also ordered the assault on the American Embassy in Baghdad. General Soleimani continued to command Iranian supported proxies in Iraq, which posed an escalating threat to the lives of Americans.
For his actions, Soleimani had been designated and sanctioned by the United Nations, European Union, and United States and is banned from international travel by United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231. In defiance of United Nations Security Council resolutions, however, Soleimani continued to travel to Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon directing and coordinating lethal actions that pose a threat to regional peace and security.

Put any of these Three BBs in charge and it won't only be our economy collapsing.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

Warren: White toast completely done

Sen. Elizabeth "Dances with Blather" Warren (D-MA) is toast. She's done, as in soon-to-be circling the toilet bowl of campaign history. As in "I know who the masked man is, but who is that woman riding with him off into the sunset?" 

The CNN Democratic presidential campaign debate Tuesday night was a clinic in journalism ethics and integrity. It was the "before" in the "before and after" techniques in how to conduct a fair debate. It was the Candy Crowley redux of 2020.

In other words, it sucked like V616 Monocerotis, a black hole located about 3,000 light years away with nine to thirteen times the mass of our Sun. That is how much it sucked because CNN is simply so bad that it's obvious.

If the CNN questioning and Warren's subsequent refusal to shake Bernie Sanders' hand after the debacle indicates anything, it certainly indicates Warren's demise as a candidate if Democratic voters have at least half a brain, which I suspect they have.

This was the worst debate of the seven heaped upon the American people. Fortunately, almost all the American people weren't interested in having their ears and eyeballs bleed from tuning in.

The debate was held in Des Moines, Iowa and hosted by the Compromised News Network. One of their moderators, Abby Phillips, along with CNN in general, was in Warren's corner all the way, as they did all they could to hit Bernie below the belt, where much hasn't been happening, one suspects, for years, with questions that were aimed at attacking him and making Warren look as if she isn't a chronic and disgusting liar.

And I don't even like Sanders. He's an idiot, but at least he's an honest idiot with idiotic ideas that he honestly expresses in what sounds like a serious speech impediment.

Phillips made it clear in her questioning that she believes Warren's saying that Bernie told her [in confidence] that a woman wouldn't be president. Sanders totally denied Warren's claim, a claim that should not have been divulged even if it was true that he said it--which is doubtful based on her history of lies.

“So, Senator Sanders, I do want to be clear here, you’re saying that you never told Senator Warren that a woman could not win the election?” Phillips asked the Vermont senator.

“That is correct,” Sanders responded.

Phillips  next turned to Warren and asked a question that quickly sparked accurate accusations of “media malpractice” online.

“Senator Warren, what did you think when Senator Sanders told you a woman could not win the election?” asked Phillips, [my emphasis]. Obviously, she was implying Sanders was lying.

“I disagreed,” Warren replied. “Bernie is my friend, and I am not here to try to fight with Bernie." She was simply intending to leak information that was either told in confidence or not told at all, in order to make Sanders sound like a misogynist.

"But, look, this question about whether or not a woman can be president has been raised, and it’s time for us to attack it head-on,” she added. 

She then used CNN's help to play the woman card hard — and slammed the men sharing the stage, as if she’d rehearsed this in a mirror for hours.

“The best way to talk about who can win is by looking at people’s winning record,” she said. “So, can a woman beat Donald Trump? Look at the men on this stage. Collectively, they have lost 10 elections. The only people on this stage who have won every single election that they’ve been in are the women. Amy [Klobuchar] and me.”

It didn't take long for the #NeverWarren hashtag to trend on social media, and you know the "Bernie Bros" are totally pissed off at her actions and lies.

My guess is that if Bernie said anything resembling Warren's accusation, he was telling her that he thought a woman wouldn't be able to tackle Trump's rhetoric. But if Sanders said he never even said that, I believe him over her. After all, the record speaks for itself.

It's hard to believe that Elizabeth Warren is even more unlikeable than Hillary Clinton. But after that debate, I believe she's in the lead in the race to the bottom of the barrel and she shares it with CNN.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings.

Tweet

Pass the butter--Biden's toast after the debate

Former Vice President Joe Biden was no match for the sharks in Thursday's Democratic debate and karma came back to bite him on the butt. A very large chunk of flesh was bitten away from his lead after he was eviscerated at the hands of Sen. Kamala "The Narc" Harris (D-CA) who accused Sleepy Joe of being not a racist, but a racist for being against school bussing back when buses were first invented.

Biden didn't know how to respond to her attacks and he came across as old and mentally deficient. In fact, in the middle of an answer to her attack, he put a time constraint upon himself and said, "My time is up." This is probably the one thing he got correct--his time is up.

His support among Democrats has dropped ten points.

"The percentage of Democrats who say they would vote for former Vice President Joe Biden if the presidential race were held tomorrow slipped by 10 points after the first primary debate," reported The Hill. 

Although Harris was being very disingenuous by attacking him on the bussing issue, because it was a failure and would likely not support it herself today, it was effective in making Biden look bad, the same way he attacked Mitt Romney in front of a black audience and claimed, "They're gonna put y'all back in chains."

Karma from Kamala.

The Hill reported: "According to a Morning Consult/FiveThirtyEight poll of likely Democratic voters released on Friday, 41.5 percent said before the debates they would vote for Biden tomorrow, but 31.5 percent said the same thing after Thursday night’s debate."

Kamala Harris was well rehearsed and prepared better than most on the debate stage, although Eric "Gimme Your Guns" Swalwell also kneecapped the old guy too, quoting Biden in a statement he made years ago about it being time for old folks to step aside and pass the torch to the next generation. Even in this case, Biden seemed unprepared! You could almost read tell that he wanted to lean over toward Bernie and ask for help on that question.

And this was the one question he should have anticipated. It was the one question you could have used to make a drinking game. 

Of course, he should have also known that because it was a Democratic debate, the issue that always comes up is race. That's the one staple the left has because their policies are so vacuous that James Dyson is considering using it in a future "Ultra-Suck Handheld" device.

If you enjoyed this post, please consider following my blog, but even if you choose not to do so, please check out the sponsors on this page.

Tweet

Hillary's biggest lie

Let's face it, the term 'honest politician' is an oxymoron. Politicians all lie--every last one of them--and you can tell when they're lying when you hear their vocal chords vibrate.

Hillary Clinton isn't only no exception to this premise, she's the leading Queen, Liar Superior, Speaketh with Forked Tongue politician alive.

The former Secretary of State with the highest air mileage to lack of accomplishments ratio is basically calling the mother of Sean Smith a liar. She says Mrs. Smith is "wrong" when she said that Clinton lied about the Benghazi attack being caused by an anti-Muslim video and not a terrorist attack.

The former First Liar told Politico the following, which when a lie is spotted, will be put in italics:

"You know, look, I feel a great deal of sympathy for the families of the four brave Americans that we lost in Baghdad. And I can't even imagine the grief that she has for losing her son. But she's wrong. She's absolutely wrong. I and everybody in the administration, all the people she named--the president, the vice president, Susan Rice [then UN Ambassador] we were scrambling to get information and that was changing literally by the hour."

When Jorge Ramos, a co-moderator at the Democratic debate questioned "Sister Twisted Story" about Mrs. Smith's accusation of lying to the American public about how the attacks transpired, and telling Chelsea the truth, she sneered as she said, "Well, Jorge, that makes my point."

She also refused to address the issue of her private server and possible indictment.

The final lie came when she said, "Good night" to the moderators.

Let's be clear: the CIA knew in real time the attacks were not due to a video and were well orchestrated. They weren't from "some guys out in the street going for a walk." It makes a difference because Clinton stood in front of the four caskets of the dead and told Mrs. Smith that "{We} are going to get the guy who made that video."

Lucky for Hillary that she is incapable of feeling shame or guilt. If she did, she would have resigned and that would have been the right thing to do.


Tweet

Hillary's straw man lies

Hillary Clinton's lips moved during last night's debate with socialist Bernie Sanders so it was no surprise that she was lying a multitude of times.

Regarding the email scandal in which it has been shown she sent and received highly classified material using her private server, the first lie came when she claimed the entire FBI affair was a "security review" not of her, but of the whole email system thingy.

Bull ploppings--the FBI investigation is about investigating whether or not Hillary Clinton broke the law and should be indicted for doing so.

She also said that no confidential information was transmitted. Prior to this she initially said the same thing then changed it to no emails "marked classified" were sent or received by her.

Balderdash--the facts prove that over 1,000 emails were classified, and that it doesn't matter whether it was marked as such, and that the agency from which the email was "born" is the responsible agency for its classification. It doesn't need to be marked, it needs a competent receiver of the email to understand that it's confidential.

Besides, over 20 of the emails were classified as "Special Access Program (SAP) which are security protocols that are above the category of "Top Secret" with safeguards and access restrictions well beyond regular classified information, such as a "black project" with operatives in the field whose lives are at risk if they are exposed to the enemies of our nation. 

These SAP emails were discovered among the deleted emails Hillary thought were gone forever but were recovered by the FBI.

Then Hillary went on to say what kids often tell their mommies: other Secretaries of State did the same as me. Why aren't you punishing them? 

She used Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell as examples. (Is that also considered racist? Only if they were Democrats I suppose.)

Another quiver of the lips, another lie from Hillary.

Neither Rice nor Powell had a private server. Neither used their private email account to send or receive classified information. Hillary is simply trying to blow smoke up the exhaust tubes of Americans by equating them with her using the straw man fallacy, or, as Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) put it, an "everybody did it defense."

The final Clinton lie in the debate came at the end when she said about the investigation, "I have absolutely no concerns about it whatsoever," adding that she's "100 percent confident" the FBI investigation will fizzle.

She is worried but her ace in the hole is President Obama. I suspect she is giving serious thought to having him appointed as a Supreme Court Justice if she becomes our next failed president. 

Imagine two incompetent leftists in these positions of power.

Obama, who is not privy to any FBI findings as yet has already weighed in on Clinton's guilt saying that he does not believe what she did posed a "national security problem."

This may be due to the fact that Obama does not believe in our nation.


Tweet

Who really won the Dem debate?

Who won the Democratic debate Saturday? Easy--the winner was . . . ISIS.

All three candidates went through excruciating calisthenics to avoid using the word "radical Islam," on the heels of a radical Islamic attack in Paris, France.

I'm not surprised Hillary Clinton wasn't honest about it--hell, she's the type of liar who can tell the families of four dead Americans from the radical Islamic attack in Benghazi that the cause was a video a handful of people in the world got to see.

But for Bernie Sanders to tap dance around those words is almost sad. Sanders obviously didn't want to talk about Islamic terrorism and said that he didn't think the term "is what's important." (It sounded more like he used the word "impawtant" but I looked it up and it doesn't exist.)

 As a Jew, Sanders is a member of Islam's most hated group of human beings. Jews are so hated by Muslims throughout the world, that Muslims don't consider them to be human, Nobel Prizes aside. Jews are  referred to as 'apes,' by the religion of peace.

They aren't fond of Christians either, referring to us as 'pigs.' But look who's calling the kettle 'black.'

When the panel was asked if they agree with Sen. Marco Rubio who said that "We are at war with radical Islam," the wife of former President Bill Clinton said that calling it such would be "painting with too broad a brush," and also said the term was "not particularly helpful."

"I don't think we're at war with Islam. I don't think we're at war with all Muslims. I think we're at war with jihadists," the Scandal Queen said, as if jihadists and Muslims were of different religions and had nothing to do with each other.

Guess which party Muslims are going to be voting for. And guess how many "radical Islamic extremists" are going to be entering the country as refugees. The winner of this guessing contest wins an AK-47 and a year's supply of ammo.

On the other hand, Hillary did concede that we are at war with "violent extremists" who use religion for "power" and "oppression." That must have been hard  for her to say, what with her closest aide, Huma Abedin, tied to the Muslim Brotherhood and Sisterhood by her own family.

Actually, Hill, Islam itself calls for power and oppression over ''unbelievers", but you would have known that if you had read the Koran, the Islamic version of Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals," a book you so love, a book dedicated to Lucifer. Even President Obama has quoted anarchist Alinsky to Israeli students.

Former Maryland Gov. O'Malley, like Hillary and Bernie, took the low road to avoid offending terrorists and non-violent Muslims. "I believe calling it what it is . . . radical jihadis. Let's not fall into the trap of thinking that all our Muslim-American neighbors in this country are somehow our enemies here. They are our first line of defense . . . We need our Muslim-American neighbors to stand up and to be part of this," said the man who backed down after saying that "all lives matter."

It looks like our "first line of defense" is being very quiet about the latest Paris attack, just like they were with the Charlie Hebdo attack back in January. If Muslim-Americans are our first line of defense, they need to speak up, speak out, and tell us who in their community sees us as the enemy.

But they don't.

O'Malley and his ideas are as useless as they were when he was the mayor of the failed city of Baltimore.

So far, French President Francois Hollande has shown strength--he called the Paris attack "an act of war" with ISIS. Now the ball is in his court, so to speak; we shall see what he does to back up his rhetoric.

Hopefully, Hollande will not take Hillary's advice of "showing "respect even for one's enemy," and to try to "empathize with their perspective and point of view." These are the words of an idiot who has no business being commander in chief of our nation. She tried to walk it back by saying "It is important to try to understand your adversary in order to figure out how they are thinking, what they will be doing, how they will react."

When you drop napalm on the bastards that immolated the caged Jordanian pilot, who gives a damn what they are thinking? We know how they will react--they will scream a lot and then they will stop screaming very quickly.

That's how you fight a war--shock and awe--the strategy comes from knowing their ideology and calling it for what it is so that you can predict their next move and know where to find them.

Mosques might be a good place to look, but liberal idiots like Bill DeBlasio don't want to infiltrate them where they plan because like all PC leftists, they don't want to offend them.



Tweet