DNC wants to change the rules to keep Sanders from the nomination

"No, millionaires ah okay-it's the Wall Shhtreet
billionaires who need to share their money"

The dailywire.com reports the Democratic National Committee may be discussing a plan to keep Democratic presidential candidate Sen, Bernard Sanders (I-VT), a full-blown Communist, from winning the party's nomination. [Shades of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Donna Brazile.]

Politico reported:

“In conversations on the sidelines of a DNC executive committee meeting and in telephone calls and texts in recent days, about a half-dozen members have discussed the possibility of a policy reversal to ensure that so-called superdelegates can vote on the first ballot at the party’s national convention. Such a move would increase the influence of DNC members, members of Congress and other top party officials, who now must wait until the second ballot to have their say if the convention is contested.”

Politico said that a rule change would be difficult to implement, but said  “the talks reveal the extent of angst that many establishment Democrats are feeling on the eve of the Iowa caucuses.”

In other words, the left knows the country isn't yet ready to go as far left as they would like us to go and they don't want President Trump to have another four years to improve the economy through free trade.

Politico added:

“The decision to relegate superdelegates – now called ‘automatic delegates’ – to the second ballot in a contested convention consumed the DNC for nearly two years after the 2016 election. Superdelegates overwhelmingly sided with Hillary Clinton, infuriating Sanders’ supporters. The rule change was widely viewed as a major victory for the Democratic Party’s left flank. At the time, Perez called the delegate overhaul ‘historic,’ while progressive Democrats and many moderates lauded its appeal to young voters skeptical of centralized party power.”

Failed leftist Green Party lunatic presidential candidate Jill Stein responded to Politico’s report tweeting:

“Desperate DNC members consider rule change to let superdelegates vote on 1st ballot to stop Sanders. If the DNC rigs another election against its voters, it’ll be asking for biggest #DemExit yet by those who want an actually democratic party. #DNCRigging”

For once I agree with Stein. The Democratic Party seems to be eating its own tail and if things continue along this route, they will be in deep trouble with the less lunatic left and the moderates.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings.





Tweet

Fed. judge rejects PA recount bid

The Green Party-backed push for a presidential election recount in key battleground states in which Hillary Clinton lost, was dealt a blow by a federal judge, rejecting their nonsensical request to recount paper ballots in the Keystone State, aka Pennsylvania. The request was to also scan some county systems for signs of hacking.

But the only hacking one gets with paper ballots is the hacking down of trees to make the paper. 

The anemic Green Party has also tried to get recounts in Michigan and Wisconsin, and although the Wisconsin recount is nearly done, a federal judge halted Michigan's recount last week. This is another setback for Jill Stein and her cohorts.

U.S. District Judge Paul Diamond said there existed 6 grounds for rejection of the Green Party lawsuit, which had been opposed by Donald Trump, the Pennsylvania Republican Party and the Pennsylvania attorney general's office.

Diamond wrote that suspicion of a hacked Pennsylvania election "borders on the irrational."

"Most importantly, there is no credible evidence that any 'hack' occurred, and compelling evidence that Pennsylvania's voting system was not in any way compromised," he wrote, and added that the lawsuit suffered from a lack of standing, potentially the lack of federal jurisdiction and an "unexplained, highly prejudicial" wait before filint last week's lawsuit, four weeks after the November 8th election. 

The lawyers for Stein and company aren't sure if they're going to appeal "But one thing is clear," said the lawyer Ilann Maazel, "The Pennsylvania election system is not fair to voters and voters don't know if their votes counted, andthat's a very large problem."

No, the very large problem is from people like Stein who put doubts in our election system and only do it to fill the coffers of her leftist party whose only real global ideas come from their relationship with plants.


Tweet

Fidel's ashes stoned

Santiago de Cuba -- Fidel Castro's ashes have been entombed in a huge stone next to national heroes. Cuba has now entered a new era--hopefully a better one--now that he communist murdering dictator is finally dead.

His brother, President Raul Castro, placed his brother's urn inside the tall monolith near the mausoleums of 19th Century Jose Marti and Castro's commie comrades of the rebellion in Santiago de Cuba.

Raul flipped a military salute at the private ceremony attended by his family and some foreign dignitaries, including fellow communists from Venezuela and Nicaragua. 

Nobody laughed or even smiled. 

"There were no speeches. It was very simple. There were just the ashes that were interred, the family, the government and officials," French Environment Minister Segolene Royal said. She had been criticized by her own countrymen for defending Castro's human rights record (which in itself, is an oxymoron). 

The funeral lasted one, long agonizing hour and marked the end of the mandatory nine days of national mourning, encouraged by the government, flooded the streets, pulled out nose hairs to facilitate lacrimation 

Green Party's Jill Stein was unable to attend the funeral due to anti-American commitments.

Buena salida, Fidel!


Tweet

Jill Stein is a moron

Jill Stein (I refuse to call her "Dr.") will do anything to gain notoriety. She just had to voice her [stupid] opinion on Saturday evening's conversation about the death of Fidel Castro. 

Stein, the Green Party presidential candidate, has imposed herself in the public eye as she raises money for election recounts in 3 states won by Donald Trump and lost miserably by her in all states. (If electoral votes measured intelligence, her IQ would be that of a box of rocks, having received zero electoral votes in her bid for office.)

Many are now wondering why she's asking for recounts and what it would change.

But now, on the death of Castro, the failed candidate went on Twitter with this gem: "Fidel Castro was a symbol of the struggle for justice in the shadow of empire. Presente!"

Fox News contributor Katie Pavlich tweeted back to her: "Hi @DrJillStein, who exactly is the person being oppressed in this photo?" [see the black and white of Castro shooting a bound prisoner.]

Pavlich later added: "And by the way @DrJillStein, you're free to move out of the United States, the "shadowing empire," and to Cuba at anytime."

Jonathan Chait tweeted: "Also, he never had an election close enough to re-count. Or any election, actually."

There were plenty of angry tweets and a few humorous ones. Yair Rosenberg: "Jill Stein deleted her tweet praising Holocaust survivor and Nobel Peace laureate Elie Wiesel on his death. She hasn't deleted this" [he indicated the link to her (above) tweet].

But my favorite was from Michael C. Moynihan: "If you're a lefty who voted for Jill Stein, you got a two-fer: A Castro apologist and a drain on Clinton's vote total."

Then added: "While you're at it, you should ask for a recount of the last Cuban election. 100% for the incumbent seems a bit fishy."

Jill Stein is a moron . . . seriously.



Tweet

Jill Stein fearing obscurity demands recount

According to the latest results, Jill Stein got 1,207,141 wasted votes in the 2016 presidential election. That's a whopping 1% of the country and proof that some people are willing to vote for anyone with a pulse who is not the person they hate. 

In 2012, Stein got an even less whopping 469,501 votes (or 0.36% of the vote) and in neither election did she get the chance to be part of the TV debates.

Now the Green Party candidate began an effort a few days ago to get recounts in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan--because Donald Trump won them and she can't stand that fact.

In her feeble efforts, much like her feeble showing at the polls, Stein raised $5.8 million toward her goal of $7 million and on Friday she made the first official recount move in Wisconsin.

President-elect Donald Trump broke his silence Saturday on the sore-loser recount effort led by the leftist Stein and now joined by election-loser Hillary Clinton in spite of her already having conceded the election. Trump called the recount effort "ridiculous" and a scam.

"The people have spoken and the election is over," said Trump. "We must accept this result and then look to the future . . . "This recount is just a way for Jill Stein . . . to fill her coffers with money, most of which she will never even spend on this ridiculous recount."

"Now that a recount in underway, we believe we have an obligation to the more than 64 million Americans who cast ballots for Hillary Clinton to participate in ongoing proceedings to ensure that an accurate vote count will be reported" [including those voters who have passed away but would have voted for Clinton, I'm sure], said Hillary for America lawyer Marc Erik Elias on Medium.

"We're standing up for a voting system that we deserve," said Stein, who, ironically, got more votes than she deserved.

Wisconsin law allows for a recount at a candidate's request, but the candidate must pay for it. The state has never before performed a recount but nothing is too good for "Crooked Hillary." Hopefully she will lose a second time and her liberal admirers can once again caterwaul with shameless abandon. It expected the recount will cost up to $1 million.

Although there's no reason to believe that there was election tampering in the states (if you don't count dead 'Democrats') Green Party spokesman George Martin insists "the American public needs to have it investigated to make sure our votes count."

I say if it's proven Trump won each of those states contested, that he be given an extra 2 years as POTUS.

Although Clinton won the popular vote by 2 million dead voters and those who voted more than once, it's the electoral votes that count and Trump kicked her rather substantial butt in that category.

Trump won Pennsylvania and Wisconsin decisively and holds only a slim lead of 10,704 in Michigan. The Associated Press has not yet officially called the race, but are expected to do so by 2018.

It was bad enough that this election lasted as long as it did, but to extend it for a recount is torturous. Just when we thought it was finally over, along came losers, Jill Stein and Hillary Clinton.

Tweet

4% of voters feel Hillary sucks less than Donald

With just one day to go before America elects its next incompetent president, it's looking good for un-indicted felon, Hillary Clinton.

In a Fox News national pre-election poll of likely voters, Clinton leads Trump by four percentage points indicating that the American voter believes that she doesn't suck as much as her opponent, and the voters are hedging their bets that she will not be indicted once becoming the president elect.

Hillary is ahead by 48 to 44 percent while Gary Johnson has 3 percent and Jill Stein 2 percent of the voters trust that neither candidate will screw things up any further than the last administration has done.

Clinton's advantage is statistically within the margin of error, but when either candidate wins tomorrow the results itself will be an error, and one that can only be corrected in four years when Michelle Obama runs on the Democratic ticket after Hillary screws up everything if she wins the presidency. 

Hillary is now winning the uterus vote by 12 points (50 to 40 percent) blacks (who still believe the Democrats are helping them in spite of facts) by 85 to 4 percent; Hispanics (63 to 30 percent) and under 30 voters (51 to 35 percent, and higher by those seen on "Watters World" playing beach volleyball who thought Lincoln was a Democrat).

Trump is favored among men 48 to 43 percent (and those in the 43 percent range believe Caitlyn Jenner is a hero for having a body part removed then inverted, and changed his name from Bruce) and whites without a college degree 61 to 30 percent (and including college men who never had the need to go to a "safe zone" or believe they should be ashamed of their race, or support the anti-Israel BDS movement).

Trump is also ahead of the seditious Democratic candidate 56 to 38 percent, indicating that 38 percent of veterans watch MSNBC, read The Times, and believe that any woman who defends her sexual predator husband against the claims made by his victims, is okay in their book.

Nine percent of Republicans support Clinton, indicating that the United States still has a serious mental health problem and it will not be solved with the continuance of Obamacare. It is also an indication that nine percent of Republican voters have made their voting decision based on a coin-flip. 

Trump beat Clinton by 4 points as being seen as honest and trustworthy (which may be due to the inability of political fact investigators to find one instance in which Clinton has told the hard, cold truth about anything). But she is seen to have a better temperament to be president by a margin of 23 percent, and as being better qualified for the job by 18 percent (but that might be either an anomaly or a joke).

The Fox News Poll is based on landline and cell phone interviews with 1,410 randomly chosen with nationwide voters and conducted in conjunction under joint direction with Anderson Robbins Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R) from Nov. 3 to 6, 2016. It used results from 1,295 likely voters. The margin of error is plus or minus 2.5 percent among both registered voters and likely voters.

In order for Donald Trump to win this election, the key is for him to get more electoral votes (or, as Joe Biden calls them 'electrical votes') than Hillary Clinton. 




Tweet

Susan Sarandon supports another loser

Highly irrelevant Susan Sarandon, a communist who made her money as a capitalist, supported Bernie Sanders during the Democratic primary, and is now endorsing another obvious loser, Jill Stein, for president.

"Fear of Donald Trump is not enough for me to support Clinton, with her record of corruption," she wrote to Stein's Green Party website, and who responded to the letter that the actress "made our day."

Sarandon listed 11 issues where she said that Clinton's position has not changed and stated "I'm therefore very happy to endorse Jill Stein for the presidency because she does stand for everything I believe in. It's clear a third party is necessary and viable at this time. And this is the first step in accomplishing this end."

The letter Sarandon wrote after finishing a doobie:

Dear Jill and team, 

I've been waiting for any indication that Hillary Clinton's position on the issues that are most urgent to me, has changed. But . . . 

She does not support the $15 minimum wage.

She shows no support for legalizing marijuana.

She supports TPP. 

She has sold fracking and Monsanto.

She supports offshore drilling.

She has no position on the Dakota Access Pipeline.

She opposes the breakup of big banks.

She takes lobbyists' money for campaigning.

She opposes a binding climate treaty.

She supports unconditional military aid to Israel.

 I'm therefore very happy to endorse Jill Stein for the presidency because she does stand for everything I believe in. 

It's clear a third party is necessary and viable at this time. And this is the first step in accomplishing this end. 

Fear of Donald Trump is not enough for me to support Clinton, with her record of corruption.

Now that Trump is self-destructing, I feel even those in swing states have the opportunity to vote their conscience.

Susan Sarandon 

As much as I dislike and totally distrust Hillary Clinton, and believe nothing she says, it's obvious that Sarandon is a total idiot, an anti-Semite, has a communist ideology but, as I said, is a capitalist when it comes to herself. 

Like Michael Moore. Like Leonardo De Caprio.



Tweet

How it adds up for the election so far

With just three weeks to the presidential election, Donald Trump is trailing Hillary Clinton in the polls, which makes the prediction easy that Trump will say the polls don't matter, the election's rigged and Hillary should be in jai.

As it stands, Hillary has a six-point lead over Donald, 45-39 percent, according to a useless poll of likely voters, a poll that doesn't matter to Trump because he's behind. Gary "Good Weed" Johnson stands at 5 percent and Green Party Jill "Spoiler" Stein is at 3 percent.

In a head-to-head matchup, Hillary is up at 49-42 percent, an edge that's slightly above the margin of error, but it still doesn't matter to Trump because as far as he's concerned, the election is rigged and there's absolutely no reason for any American to go out and vote. "Hillary's gonna win, folks. She's gonna win, I can tell you."

The third and final debate will be tomorrow on Fox News Channel and moderated by Chris Wallace. This is the first time Fox will be moderating a presidential debate because the media is rigged folks, that I can tell you. Believe me.

According to the polls, a large gender gap exists. Among men, Trump leads by 7 points and Clinton is ahead by 17 points among women. She also leads among non-whites, you know, those who the party of the KKK, Bull Connor, Robert Byrd and George Wallace have convinced will be better served by them. 

Hillary also leads among naive voters under 30 (+19). Johnson and Stein are supported by one in five, young, pot smoking socialists who have no knowledge of economics. College degree whites also favor Clinton by 9 points, but whites without a college degree but a chip on their shoulder favor Trump by 27 points. He's also favored by veterans by 17 points and religious people by 16 points. Hillary has the atheist vote cornered along with the seriously uninformed voter vote.   

Trump has a slight lead with independents at 7 points but only 80 percent of Republicans back him--the other 20 percent back Stephen Harper, the former conservative Prime Minister of Canada.

For both Trump and Clinton, supporters are about equally matched on strength of support and interest, but if Donald Trump doesn't try throwing in a few different words in his speeches, the strength of support and interest may fade. 

Believe me, folks.

Temperament is a different story. About 61 percent of voters say Clinton has the temperament to serve effectively as POTUS while 61 percent of voters say Trump does not. 

He plans to bomb the s**t out of those who say he does not.

Clinton leads Trump by voters who believe she has the judgment to serve (53-46 percent), while Trump is the opposite (37-60 percent) but the truth is, neither candidate will ever replace Judge Judy or Charles Krauthammer.

Many voters do not believe the media is being fair to the candidates. Fifty-one percent say the news coverage of Trump has been fair  (46 percent) or biased in his favor (5 percent), but 43 percent say it's been unfairly biased against him.

After further exploration, it seems more likely that Donald Trump has been biased against himself as some of the topics his ego refuses to let go of continue to hurt him.

Only 11 percent of voters believe Clinton has been treated unfairly by the media, and those voters would say the same thing if Hillary was caught on video having sex with a Girl Scout against her will.


Tweet