DNC wants to change the rules to keep Sanders from the nomination

"No, millionaires ah okay-it's the Wall Shhtreet
billionaires who need to share their money"

The dailywire.com reports the Democratic National Committee may be discussing a plan to keep Democratic presidential candidate Sen, Bernard Sanders (I-VT), a full-blown Communist, from winning the party's nomination. [Shades of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Donna Brazile.]

Politico reported:

“In conversations on the sidelines of a DNC executive committee meeting and in telephone calls and texts in recent days, about a half-dozen members have discussed the possibility of a policy reversal to ensure that so-called superdelegates can vote on the first ballot at the party’s national convention. Such a move would increase the influence of DNC members, members of Congress and other top party officials, who now must wait until the second ballot to have their say if the convention is contested.”

Politico said that a rule change would be difficult to implement, but said  “the talks reveal the extent of angst that many establishment Democrats are feeling on the eve of the Iowa caucuses.”

In other words, the left knows the country isn't yet ready to go as far left as they would like us to go and they don't want President Trump to have another four years to improve the economy through free trade.

Politico added:

“The decision to relegate superdelegates – now called ‘automatic delegates’ – to the second ballot in a contested convention consumed the DNC for nearly two years after the 2016 election. Superdelegates overwhelmingly sided with Hillary Clinton, infuriating Sanders’ supporters. The rule change was widely viewed as a major victory for the Democratic Party’s left flank. At the time, Perez called the delegate overhaul ‘historic,’ while progressive Democrats and many moderates lauded its appeal to young voters skeptical of centralized party power.”

Failed leftist Green Party lunatic presidential candidate Jill Stein responded to Politico’s report tweeting:

“Desperate DNC members consider rule change to let superdelegates vote on 1st ballot to stop Sanders. If the DNC rigs another election against its voters, it’ll be asking for biggest #DemExit yet by those who want an actually democratic party. #DNCRigging”

For once I agree with Stein. The Democratic Party seems to be eating its own tail and if things continue along this route, they will be in deep trouble with the less lunatic left and the moderates.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings.





Tweet

Carlos Maza has hissy fit over Ted Cruz defending Steven Crowder. Cruz destroys him

The stream of BlazeTV's  "Louder With Crowder" has been demonetized by YouTube mainly because they don't have a backbone or a single set of cojones amongst the entire staff at YouTube. Steven Crowder, the conservative comedian, was shut down after complains by the lisping gay Mexican activist Carlos Maza.

Maza is formerly of Media Matters, so that should tell you where his head is at when it isn't elsewhere [i.e., stuck in his nether regions]. The Vox activist went berserk over Cruz’s voiced support for free speech and traded words with the Republican Senator from the great state of Texas.

"This is ridiculous. YouTube is not the Star Chamber — stop playing God & silencing those voices you disagree with. This will not end well," said Cruz on Thursday.

In a subsequent tweet, Cruz wrote: 

"This is nuts. YouTube needs to explain why [Steven Crowder] is banned, but [Samantha Bee] ('Ivanka is a feckless c***.') & [Jim Carrey] ('look at my pretty picture of Gov. Kay Ivey being murdered in the womb') aren’t. No coherent standard explains it. Here’s an idea: DON’T BLACKLIST ANYBODY."

Maza took a shot at Cruz and, without a shred of even one example, insanely accused YouTube of being biased in favor of "right-wingers."

"A U.S. senator is coming to the defense of someone who spent two years calling me a 'lispy queer,'" the lispy queer responded. He actually refers to himself as a "queer" so in respect to his use of a personal pronoun, so will I.

"They do this because they know that [YouTube] cares more about looking fair to right-wingers than it does about stopping hate speech and harassment," he said, proving that he is delusional.

In follow-up tweets, Maza claimed that the censorship of right-learning creators on big tech platforms is not actually censorship and protested against "hate speech," a vaguely defined, subjective term that's as honest as the term "Islamophobia." That is, the term "hate speech" usually means any speech the person making the accusation wants to shut down, a totally unconstitutional move.

"Conservatives have spent years arguing that even basic content moderation is a form of 'censorship.' Their goal is to scare platforms like [YouTube] away from enforcing their hate speech policies. And it’s working, because YouTube doesn’t have the guts to protect its creators," the lispy queer dishonestly wrote.

"You can’t give these people an inch. They won’t stop crying ‘liberal bias!’ until they’re allowed to use hate speech with impunity. And that’s exactly what [YouTube] is allowing them to do,” Maza whined, not defining his use of the term.

"Sigh," replied Cruz. "This individual claims to be a 'journalist.' Then he throws a fit & demands that YouTube CENSOR views he doesn’t like."

"Here’s a crazy idea," offered Sen. Cruz, "if you don’t like what [Steven Crowder] says, ARGUE AGAINST HIM. Make your case in what John Stuart Mill called the 'marketplace of ideas.'"

This confused Maza. He had no idea why a cereal company would have any say in the matter about marketplaces.

On Tuesday, YouTube admitted that Steven Crowder's videos "don’t violate" any of their policies after "conducting an in-depth review of the videos flagged" by queer activist Carlos Maza. But the platform reversed course after the queer activist threw a hissy Twitter fit, accusing YouTube of being anti-LGBT and encouraging LGBT employees at the company to "walk out" in protest.

The scared the bejeezus out of YouTube as they feared the world would not see them as being woke and not respect the wishes of queers and transgender minorities by refusing to go along with their demands.

"Update on our continued review–we have suspended this channel’s monetization," YouTube said on Wednesday, as they capitulated to the demands of the drama queen. 

"We came to this decision because a pattern of egregious actions has harmed the broader community and is against our YouTube Partner Program policies.”

YouTube is full of crap. Their Partner Program policies is a moving target and constantly changing as it moves ever further to the left. If you want to see our First Amendment rights disappear, you can just sit back and do nothing. Otherwise, I suggest you support conservative speech, join websites like LouderWithCrowder.com and DailyWire.com, among many others.

Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey 
Thanks.

Tweet