Posts
Maza is formerly of Media Matters, so that should tell you where his head is at when it isn't elsewhere [i.e., stuck in his nether regions]. The Vox activist went berserk over Cruz’s voiced support for free speech and traded words with the Republican Senator from the great state of Texas.
"This is ridiculous. YouTube is not the Star Chamber — stop playing God & silencing those voices you disagree with. This will not end well," said Cruz on Thursday.
In a subsequent tweet, Cruz wrote:
"This is nuts. YouTube needs to explain why [Steven Crowder] is banned, but [Samantha Bee] ('Ivanka is a feckless c***.') & [Jim Carrey] ('look at my pretty picture of Gov. Kay Ivey being murdered in the womb') aren’t. No coherent standard explains it. Here’s an idea: DON’T BLACKLIST ANYBODY."Maza took a shot at Cruz and, without a shred of even one example, insanely accused YouTube of being biased in favor of "right-wingers."
"A U.S. senator is coming to the defense of someone who spent two years calling me a 'lispy queer,'" the lispy queer responded. He actually refers to himself as a "queer" so in respect to his use of a personal pronoun, so will I.
"They do this because they know that [YouTube] cares more about looking fair to right-wingers than it does about stopping hate speech and harassment," he said, proving that he is delusional.
In follow-up tweets, Maza claimed that the censorship of right-learning creators on big tech platforms is not actually censorship and protested against "hate speech," a vaguely defined, subjective term that's as honest as the term "Islamophobia." That is, the term "hate speech" usually means any speech the person making the accusation wants to shut down, a totally unconstitutional move.
"Conservatives have spent years arguing that even basic content moderation is a form of 'censorship.' Their goal is to scare platforms like [YouTube] away from enforcing their hate speech policies. And it’s working, because YouTube doesn’t have the guts to protect its creators," the lispy queer dishonestly wrote.
"You can’t give these people an inch. They won’t stop crying ‘liberal bias!’ until they’re allowed to use hate speech with impunity. And that’s exactly what [YouTube] is allowing them to do,” Maza whined, not defining his use of the term.
"Sigh," replied Cruz. "This individual claims to be a 'journalist.' Then he throws a fit & demands that YouTube CENSOR views he doesn’t like."
"Here’s a crazy idea," offered Sen. Cruz, "if you don’t like what [Steven Crowder] says, ARGUE AGAINST HIM. Make your case in what John Stuart Mill called the 'marketplace of ideas.'"
In follow-up tweets, Maza claimed that the censorship of right-learning creators on big tech platforms is not actually censorship and protested against "hate speech," a vaguely defined, subjective term that's as honest as the term "Islamophobia." That is, the term "hate speech" usually means any speech the person making the accusation wants to shut down, a totally unconstitutional move.
"Conservatives have spent years arguing that even basic content moderation is a form of 'censorship.' Their goal is to scare platforms like [YouTube] away from enforcing their hate speech policies. And it’s working, because YouTube doesn’t have the guts to protect its creators," the lispy queer dishonestly wrote.
"You can’t give these people an inch. They won’t stop crying ‘liberal bias!’ until they’re allowed to use hate speech with impunity. And that’s exactly what [YouTube] is allowing them to do,” Maza whined, not defining his use of the term.
"Sigh," replied Cruz. "This individual claims to be a 'journalist.' Then he throws a fit & demands that YouTube CENSOR views he doesn’t like."
"Here’s a crazy idea," offered Sen. Cruz, "if you don’t like what [Steven Crowder] says, ARGUE AGAINST HIM. Make your case in what John Stuart Mill called the 'marketplace of ideas.'"
This confused Maza. He had no idea why a cereal company would have any say in the matter about marketplaces.
On Tuesday, YouTube admitted that Steven Crowder's videos "don’t violate" any of their policies after "conducting an in-depth review of the videos flagged" by queer activist Carlos Maza. But the platform reversed course after the queer activist threw a hissy Twitter fit, accusing YouTube of being anti-LGBT and encouraging LGBT employees at the company to "walk out" in protest.
On Tuesday, YouTube admitted that Steven Crowder's videos "don’t violate" any of their policies after "conducting an in-depth review of the videos flagged" by queer activist Carlos Maza. But the platform reversed course after the queer activist threw a hissy Twitter fit, accusing YouTube of being anti-LGBT and encouraging LGBT employees at the company to "walk out" in protest.
The scared the bejeezus out of YouTube as they feared the world would not see them as being woke and not respect the wishes of queers and transgender minorities by refusing to go along with their demands.
"Update on our continued review–we have suspended this channel’s monetization," YouTube said on Wednesday, as they capitulated to the demands of the drama queen.
"Update on our continued review–we have suspended this channel’s monetization," YouTube said on Wednesday, as they capitulated to the demands of the drama queen.
"We came to this decision because a pattern of egregious actions has harmed the broader community and is against our YouTube Partner Program policies.”
YouTube is full of crap. Their Partner Program policies is a moving target and constantly changing as it moves ever further to the left. If you want to see our First Amendment rights disappear, you can just sit back and do nothing. Otherwise, I suggest you support conservative speech, join websites like LouderWithCrowder.com and DailyWire.com, among many others.
Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey
Thanks.
Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment