Showing posts with label Center for American Progress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Center for American Progress. Show all posts

Sunday, April 28, 2019

Kamala Harris wants to take away workers' rights to not join unions


Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., indicated on Saturday that if [G-d forbid] she became president, she would use the "bully pulpit" to fight "right-to-work" laws, describing them a** backwards as an attack on workers' rights.

"The barriers to organized labor being able to organize and strike are something that have grown over a period of time," the 2020 presidential hopeful said while speaking at the National Forum on Wages and Working People.

At the event, Harris emphasized the bully pulpit and executive authority to fight for workers' rights and specifically mentioned right-to-work laws.

"It has to be about, for example, banning right-to-work laws," she said.

The event, organized by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and the Center for American Progress, sought to "provide an opportunity for thought leaders to go beyond talking points and share concrete plans to rebalance our economy and democracy," according to its website.

The SEIU has historically supported Democratic candidates and spent $28 million in support of Barack Obama's campaign in 2008. In 2012, the organization reported spending almost $70 million for campaign donations, TV ads, and get-out-the-vote efforts and they're a major supporter of Obamacare and increased minimum wage laws.

The Center for American Progress (CAP) is very much like SEIU in its support of leftist policies. But this organization has a very questionable reputation.

For instance, in October 2016, Intercept reported that the United Arab Emirates Ambassador to the U.S. Yousef Al Otaiba praised "a CAP report that advocates for continued cooperation with Gulf states like Saudi Arabia and the UAE."

And in January this year, two CAP staff members were terminated for leaking an email exchange that suggested the UAE has an improper influence over CAP. This may be true, based on CAP's use of anti-Israel and anti-Semitic rhetoric. They were criticized by several Jewish organizations over this issue.

Bloggers associated with CAP published several posts using phrases such as "apartheid" and "Israel-firsters", causing NGP Monitor, the American Jewish Committee, and the Anti-Defamation League to label them anti-Israel and call on CAP to disassociate themselves from these statements. Officials at CAP said the “inappropriate” language came only in personal tweets—not on CAP's website or its ThinkProgress blog. The Tweets were deleted, and the authors apologized.

Others, however, criticized CAP for what they considered censorship of reasonable comments critical of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank and other policies.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (Communist-VT) another 2020 presidential contender, first said in April that he would work to ban right-to-work laws, which exist in 26 states.

Trump has praised the Janus decision, describing it as a "Big loss for the coffers of the Democrats!"

Basically, the right to work allows people to not join a union if they so choose. This seems to be a person's right to not have to pay union dues just to be allowed to work a particular job. Of course, the argument goes that why should the worker who isn't paying union dues, be allowed to profit from the work of the union when he or she isn't paying for the benefits?

During his 2016 campaign, Trump supported right-to-work legislation.

"We've had great support from [union] workers, the people that work, the real workers, but I love the right to work," he said. "I like it better because it is lower. It is better for the people," he added somewhat confusingly. [Lower? What does that mean?]


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.




Thursday, October 27, 2016

WikiLeaks emails show Clinton's allies unaware over 'insane' private server

It's good to know that some of Hillary Clinton's top advisers weren't aware that she was using a private [illegal] server as secretary of state. It gives one hope that if she becomes POTUS (heaven forfend) that one or two of her top aides may actually be concerned over national security, not that it will change the open borders that Clinton wants.

Some of her top advisers had no clue as to the depth and scope of her email system when the scandal broke in March 2015. Even her current campaign manager had no idea about the bathroom server according to the Thursday WikiLeaks release of emails.

A close ally ('You go girlfriend') of Hillary's, Neera Tanden, the head of the Center for American Progress, was still p'd off months after the scandal broke. She pressed John Podesta over who gave Hillary permission to use the private system.

"Do we actually know who told Hillary she could use a private email? And has that person been drawn and quartered?" Tanden wrote in July. "Like whole thing is f***ing insane."

But some of Clinton's closest aides, especially those who worked with her at the State Department (like Cheryl Mills and Huma Weiner Abedin) were very likely aware and on board with the illegal email setup, while others were in the dark.

On March 2nd, Podesta wrote to campaign manager Robby Mook asking if he had "any idea of the depth of this story?"

March 3rd, 1:32 a. m. Mook wrote back: "Nope. We brought up the existence of emails in research this summer but were told that everything was taken care of."

March 2nd, John Podesta also wrote to Tanden about his worries the day the email scandal broke. "Speaking of transparency, our friends [attorney David] Kendall, Cheryl and Phillipe [Reines] sure weren't forthcoming on the facts here."

Tanden's reply implied that keeping the [illegal] email setup a secret was probably Cheryl Mills' doing: "This is a Cheryl special," she wrote. "Know you love her, but this stuff is like her Achilles heel. Or kryptonite. She just can't say no to this s**t. Why didn't they get this stuff out like 18 months ago? So crazy. I guess I know the answer they wanted to get away with it."

Six months afterward, Tanden was still angry, and in a September 4th interview said Clinton still owed the American people an apology.

Actually, the American people are owed more than an apology. We are owed an FBI director who upholds the law and is apolitical. We are owed an Attorney General who wears the blindfold of fairness and justice. 

We are owed true transparency, not just words.

And we are owed a prison sentence for Hillary Clinton who clearly broke the law simply by having a private server and a real investigation into the Clinton Foundation with questionable practices.





Conservatives erupt after DNC attacks top White House Official with vulgarity in personal attack

The official Democratic National Committee X account decided Wednesday afternoon that the best way to win back the normies was to channel t...