Dem Aide: AOC has 'no plans to serve the people'

A Democrat aide in an interview last week with The New York Post said that former 29-year-old bartender and current socialist Rep[ulsive] Alexandria Occupies-Congress (D-NY) has no plans to serve Americans.

Her office does not answer phone calls and basically tells people trying to seek help to call back later and later becomes yet later again. 

"Critics of Ocasio-Cortez suggest making constituents play phone tag is proof that she’s more show pony than work horse," The Post reported.

The frightening truth is, socialist AOC is more interested in national exposure than local involvement so her constituents can whistle before they receive any assistance.

"She has no plans to serve the people. That’s why she has no constituent services operation," the Democratic aide told The New York Post. "If you’re a grandma in Queens who needs help with her Medicare and you call AOC’s 'district office' you get a recording that tells you to visit the website instead." [But if you don't have a computer for whatever reason, you're screwed.]

"What kind of elitist nonsense is that?" the aide added. "Shameful, it’s all shameful."

AOC is extremely unpopular in her own district. Her re-election campaign thus far received only 10 contributors within her district. You may say it's because her district is poor, but that just shows how much more in need they are of her office's assistance.

Conservative media such as the Daily Wire have repeatedly reached out to AOC for comment on a host of issues ranging from her support of notorious anti-Semites to her quoting Nazi sympathizers, but she apparently refuses to respond or is too busy pushing her agenda with the obviously socialist Green New Deal to actually deal with her questionable behavior.

The Daily Caller reported:

"The average freshman representative's reelection campaign received $107,141.29 in itemized contributions from their constituents in the first half of 2019, FEC filings the DCNF analyzed show," . "Ocasio-Cortez's reported in-district fundraising haul of $1,525.50 was just 1.4% of that average."

Poll numbers from within Occupies-Congress' district indicate that her own people thinks she is almost as effective as a nerf gun hunting bear.

A door-to-door poll from Stop The AOC PAC yielded the following key results:

They think she sucks more than a Dyson vacuum. She has a more than 2:1 ratio of unfavorable (50.88%) to favorable (21.37%) in public opinion.

They think she's as honest as a "bust-a-balloon-for-a-prize" at a carnival. Only 10.75% thought she had their best interests in mind in quashing the Amazon deal – 32.60% said she didn’t. The 10.75% who said she did have the best interests of them in mind have posters of her in their bedrooms cooking zucchini.

Alexandria Occupies-Congress' district wants her as much as a leftist wants free speech from a conservative and Trump to win a second term. Fully 33.44% are ready to vote against her, and only 13.30% would vote for her because they share the same envy of the wealth of others that all socialists share.

Please consider following this blog and feel free to click on the ads on this page. It costs nothing, and may just save your life. Or not.

Tweet

Alexandria Obviously-Comatose goes all-out political on synagogue shooting

Rep. Alexandria Occasionally-Coherent (Communist-NY) cannot hold her water nor her fleeting thoughts which make as much sense as scuba gear does to a blowfish.

On Saturday, the low-functioning socialist attacked the Republican majority Senate and pushed for gun control immediately after the synagogue shooting in Poway, California which left one woman dead, a child and two adults injured, one being the rabbi of that synagogue.

It seems that some people cannot process such horrible events outside of their narcissistic political ambitions. And worse, it takes away from the significance of the event and the real problems we are facing as a nation.

All of the gun control in the world wouldn't have prevented the shooting, and it was a good man with a gun that prevented the attack from escalating into something much worse.

The 19-year-old scumbag terrorist opened fire on people inside the Chabad of Poway synagogue before being shot at by an off duty U.S. Border Patrol agent. Yes, that agent prevented a significantly worse tragedy from taking place because he shot back at the coward who didn't think anyone would be there with a gun.

Immediately following the tragic attack, the airhead AOC tweeted:

"Heartbroken to hear of the San Diego synagogue shooting, particularly so on this final day of Passover. We have a responsibility to love + protect our neighbors. The longer the Senate delays holding a vote on #HR8, the more we put Americans at risk."

Funny, but AOC totally ignored the Easter day Islamic terrorist attacks at churches in Sri Lanka that killed hundreds of Christians. But she sure went ballistic and politicized the terrorist attacks on mosques in New Zealand last month. She only seems to use tragedy when it fits her political agenda, which is why deep down, she is a phony, a fraud, a person only concerned about herself.

Both the New Zealand mosque attacks and the Poway synagogue attack were perpetrated by white supremacists with firearms. This worked for AOC's agenda. The Sri Lankan church attacks were carried out with jihadis with suicide vests and car bombs, thus, they weren't important for her to speak about.

Twitter users went after her when she called for universal background checks.

Hillel Neuer tweeted:

"You just embraced the anti-Semites Jeremy Corbyn and Ilhan Omar. Perhaps today you should just remain silent, unless you wish to apologize for your actions."

AG Conservative tweeted:

"Please stop trying to exploit the spilling of Jewish blood to push a partisan agenda. Especially since you know none of the facts, the shooting happened in a state that already has strong gun control laws, and you have a history of excusing anti-Semitism."

Arthur Schwartz, a GOP strategist tweeted:

"She’s using Jewish blood to push a vote in the Senate." 

"Bodies aren't even cold and you're standing on their graves to promote legislation that won't have any effect," Ben McDonald tweeted.

"Can really tell how heartbroken you are by the way you’re using a targeted Synagogue shooting to push your own legislation," Harry Khachatrian tweeted.

Arsen Ostrovsky tweeted:

"Horrific indeed. And Members of Congress must lead by example, including condemning and speaking out unequivocally against Antisemitism - including when it is done within your own party, not excusing and defending it!"

The Blaze's Jason Howerton tweeted:

"An armed hero stopped the shooter and prevented what could have been and even more horrific loss of life. California already has draconian gun laws. How is your answer 'more gun control?'"

Stephen Miller tweeted:

"Oh is incitement and rhetoric not to blame for this one? Weird."

AOC has frequently defended outspoken anti-Semites, including Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), far-left activist Linda Sarsour, and British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn.

How anyone could vote for this disgusting excuse for a congresswoman when she runs again is beyond the realm of logic and understanding.

It's time for her to go.



Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

AOC thinks like a 1st grader as she tweets another gaffe

Rep. Alexandria Occasionally-Comatose (Socialist-NY) is the gift that keeps on giving, especially when it comes to proving that the left never quite depends on verifying the facts and proving herself to be an idiot in lipstick.

One of the socialist's tweets backfired on Thursday when she tried attacking Republicans over a picture of a politician stood next to a cardboard cutout of her.

The low-functioning legislator tweeted:

"GOP: Let's pose our older male members next to cardboard cutouts of young female legislators." 

Her tweet included a post from the Republican Party of Kentucky. However, the politician pictured was Democratic Rep. John Yarmuth, Ky., not a Republican as she claimed.

Ocasio-Cortez later deleted the tweet but not before critics caught her lame gaffe and pointed it out on Twitter.

Ryan Saavedra of the Daily Wire tweeted:

It literally says in the tweet that she is quoting that Yarmuth is a Democrat 

He then added:

The most hilarious part about this is that just a couple minutes prior she was attacking the "GOP" for "bad-faith attacking" her idea, claiming that they were like "1st grade readers"

And then finished her off with:

Even more embarrassing for Ocasio-Cortez, she is co-sponsor of legislation reintroduced by John Yarmuth earlier this month.

Matt Whitlock, a senior advisor to the National Republican Senatorial Committee tweeted:

"1st grade readers are in fact the worst,"

 He was knocking AOC for one of her earlier tweets whereby she called pundits "first graders" for apparently misinterpreting her comments on voting rights for prisoners [which they didn't misinterpret.]

If this was her first brain fart that wouldn't be important to disclose, but the low-information congress-cretin, who apparently does no checking of facts before she blathers on, has even made Joe Biden look relatively bright.

Last year, she was criticized after she suggested the government could pay for a large portion of Medicare-for-all by transferring "$21 trillion" in Pentagon "financial transactions" — a claim that fact checkers disputed. She apparently has no conception of how large a number $21 trillion is.

Occasionally-Comatose has been described as one of the leaders of the progressive wing in the Democratic Party. She, along with Sanders, has received intense criticism for policy proposals like the "Green New Deal." That's a policy that pretends to be for climate change while hiding in plain sight as a socialist coup of the country.


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Green New Deal 'wet noodles' in the Senate

Rep. Alexandria Obviously-Comatose's [AOC] (freshman Socialist-NY) Green New Deal (GND) was brought up to a vote on the Senate floor by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (D-KY). This upset the socialist author of the deal because she discovered that people took it seriously by reading it and decided to call her out on her stupidity.

The deal is an ultra radical and quite "hilarious" proposal for dealing with climate change by eliminating cows because they fart a lot, and knocking down all the buildings in America and refitting them for zero carbon emissions. It also calls for the elimination of all gas-driven vehicles and airplanes and this is to be substituted with choo-choo trains that can magically travel on water or on an invisible bridge that spans the newly cleaned up planet.

The Senate failed to reach the 60 votes needed to start a debate on the non-binding, silly as a cow fart resolution. In fact, no Democrat voted for it in spite of them touting it as the best thing since Silly Putty on white bread. In fact, 42 Democrats voted "present" because they didn't have the guts to vote for the thing they supported in public.

No senator voted to begin debate on the legislation, while 57 lawmakers voted against breaking the filibuster. Democratic Sens. Doug Jones of Alabama, Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten "Allahu Akbar" Sinema, [a Taliban supporter] from Arizona joined 53 Republicans in voting "no." Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, who caucuses with the Democrats, also noted "no."

McConnell put the vote forward so that Democratic senators would have to go on the record about the bat crap crazy measure. He referred to the proposal as "a radical, top-down, socialist makeover of the entire U.S. economy." At a news conference earlier Tuesday, McConnell said he believed that climate change was real and at least partially caused by humans, but said the real question facing lawmakers was, "How do you address it?"

Special Class let out early

[Democratic answer: By destroying the economy, killing all the cows, grounding all the planes, stopping all the cows, knocking down all the buildings, and making AOC the "boss."]

"The way to do this, consistent with American values and American capitalism is through technology and innovation," McConnell said. " ... Not to shut down your economy, throw people out of work, make people reconstruct their homes, get out of their cars, you get the whole drift here. This is nonsense, and if you’re going to sign on to nonsense, you ought to have to vote for nonsense."

Touché, mon ami.

Democrats, led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck "Nostrils Like Tunnels" Schumer, called McConnell's move a "sham vote" that aimed to draw attention away from real debate on the consequences of climate change.

No Chucky--it's a sham proposal that you idiots said you supported. All Mitch did was hold your feet to the fire.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Alex from da Bronx upset that Mitch McConnell took her empty-headed plan seriously

Can you guess which one is the happy socialist?

Socialist Rep. Alexandria Obviously-Comatose (D-NY) is angry at Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell because after she proposed her ridiculous $93 trillion Green New Deal, he decided to allow a vote on it next week. Having a modicum of self-awareness of her doltish proposal, she knew it would be looked at as a feeble attempt at sounding intelligent, so she took to Twitter and said that McConnell was "wasting votes" and that his plan was "a disgrace."

But it isn't wasting votes because voting on the GND would show the American public just where their representatives stood on socialism, cow farts, the abolishment of all carbon emissions including autos and planes, to support a program designed to bankrupt the country and make her "the boss."

Ocasio-Cortez's ire was sparked by a report in The Washington Post that noted that Republicans are elevating the crazy fringe, far-left-wing of the Democratic Party — which includes her — to see which 2020 Democratic presidential candidates are crazy enough to align with their agenda.

The Post notes that that effort begins next week with a "midweek vote on the Green New Deal" to see which Democrats support the plan, which is the aforementioned massive government takeover of private industries.

"The GOP’s whole game of wasting votes in Congress to target others 'on the record', for leg they have no intent to pass, is a disgrace," Ocasio-Cortez tweeted. "Stop wasting the American peoples’ time + learn to govern. Our jobs aren’t for campaigning, & that’s exactly what these bluff-votes are for."

So why then did she propose it if she didn't want the GOP to take her seriously?

"I've noted with great interest the Green New Deal," McConnell said last month. "And we're going to be voting on that in the Senate. Give everybody an opportunity to go on record and see how they feel about the Green New Deal."

Now that's a good one.

Democratic Sen. Ed Markey, who introduced the laughable Green New Deal with the freshman socialist AOC, inexplicably claimed last month that McConnell allowing a vote on the bill was his way of secretly "sabotaging" it.

So voting on their proposal would sabotage their proposal--makes perfect sense if you happen to be a flaming contrarian.

"Don’t let Mitch McConnell fool you: this is nothing but an attempt to sabotage the movement we are building," Markey tweeted. "He wants to silence your voice so Republicans don’t have to explain why they are climate change deniers. McConnell wants this to be the end, this is just the beginning."

Republicans, for the most part, are not climate change deniers. We understand that there is likely some truth to the change in climate. But when idiots like Markey and Comatose tell us we've got a dozen years to do something or die, that sounds like something Beto O'Rourke might tell his wife is a green avocado.

"This isn't a new Republican trick," Markey continued. "By rushing a vote on the #GreenNewDeal resolution, Republicans want to avoid a true national debate & kill our efforts to organize. We’re having the first national conversation on climate change in a decade. We can’t let Republicans sabotage it."

Sorry, you can't have it both ways, Markey. You and your idiot child put the deal together as an actual proposal, and maybe you didn't read it yourself, but voting on it is the best way to consider its merits.

Earlier this month, even the very liberal AFL-CIO, America’s largest organized-labor group, slammed Comatose's plan in a letter, saying that it could "cause immediate harm to millions of our members and their families." They were considering to recommend that AOC stick to bartending and get out of politics.

"We welcome the call for labor rights and dialogue with labor, but the Green New Deal resolution is far too short on specific solutions that speak to the jobs of our members and the critical sections of our economy," the letter from the AFL-CIO Energy Committee stated. "It is not rooted in an engineering-based approach and makes promises that are not achievable or realistic."

In fact, they're absolutely schizophrenic in a socialist kind of way.

"We will not accept proposals that could cause immediate harm to millions of our members and their families," the letter continued. "We will not stand by and allow threats to our members’ jobs and their families’ standard of living go unanswered."

So AOC was even able to piss off America's largest organized labor organization.

But she's cute and can dance.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Alexandria Obviously-Comatose's 'unfavorabie' rating soars

"I was like, you know, kind of like bummed"

The more the public gets to know Alexandria Obviously-Comatose, the more they dislike her ideas. This is due, in part, to the fact that she really doesn't have any reality-based ideas, and those she espouses sound like they came from a high school spliff and beer party.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s unfavorable rating have finally reflected her actual lack of knowledge about most "stuff" after just a few months in Congress. Now most of the public views her negatively rather than favorably, a new poll shows.

The socialist Democrat rose quickly to fame when the Democrat party swung hard left and embraced socialist policies such as her idiotic Green New Deal, yet the more people learned about the 29-year-old airhead congresswoman, the more they were turned off by her, because basically, people aren't dolts.

A Gallup poll released Friday shows that Obviously-Comatose's unfavorable rating has risen by 15 points since September, when she had yet to win the general election, increasing from 26 percent to 41 percent of the American adults polled.

She has also increased her favorability rating, but only by a mere 7 points. About 31 percent of surveyed people view her favorably, compared to 24 percent in September now that they know she's quite vacuous.

What most people like about her is that she can cook and speak simultaneously, which is a great accomplishment for "Alex from da Bronx." [She left the Bronx at age 7 and moved north to a wealthy neighborhood.]

Since September, AOC became more widely recognized across the country, with half of the respondents saying they have never heard of her before. Now only a fifth of surveyed people says they aren’t familiar with the self-described Democratic socialist, which is can be defined as a socialist who hasn't yet purchased a gun.

The poll also notes that Ocasio-Cortez’s name is the easiest to satirize and she has been dubbed: Alexandria Occasional Cortex; and Alexandria Obviously-Communist, among others.

Her name recognition is growing compared to that of other politicians at the same point in their careers in Congress. More surveyed people know the New York socialist than they knew Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Marco Rubio or Ted Cruz as freshmen, proving that stupid is more easily recognized than Native American and intelligent--as in the latter two senators mentioned.

Overall, the results suggest that Ocasio-Cortez may be a polarizing figure. Most of her support is galvanized around younger, less worldly, less intelligent, more diverse Democrat-leaning groups, while most of her opposition is composed of Republicans, patriotic Americans, people who understand basic economics and more conservative Democrat-leaning groups.

Nearly three-quarters of Republican respondents say they view her negatively, with only 5 percent having a positive view. Among the Democrats, 56 percent of respondents had a favorable view of Ocasio-Cortez, compared to only 15 percent of the Democrats polled who don’t support her.

She’s also favored by live-with-mom adults 18 to 34, people of color and women. Yet she’s facing a favorability deficit among intelligent men (-24), whites (-24), and adults 55 or older (-22) who know better than to support someone who believes the world will end in 12 years if we don't go socialist.

Among self-described independents, she has a negative net rating of 5 percent, which ironically matches her intelligence quotient.


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.





Tweet

Bill Nye Science Guy and AOC economics major will save humanity

Bill Nye the kid's "Science Guy" and Alexandria Obviously-Comatose have put their heads together and have come up with a plan to save us from ourselves from climate change and income inequality.

With only a mere 12 years remaining before the planet can no longer accommodate life as we know it, the dynamic duo joined forces at the South by Southwest (SXSW) conference in Austin, Texas and played tickle-slap, took a heehaw photo together, and who knows what else went on between them.

The Science Guy for kids posted a photo of himself and 29-year-old Obviously-Comatose on Twitter where AOC's fans [known as "Twits"] tweeted their approval.

“AOC gets it. She sees that fear is dividing us," Nye obliviously noted, forgetting that AOC said the world will end in 12 years if she doesn't do something about it. "We can address income inequality. We can address climate change, if we get together and get to work," he wrote, without explaining how they plan to rob the rich to redistribute to the poor, nor how they plan to retrofit every single structure in America, and how that can be done in 10 years.

"I think the part of it that is generational is that millennials and people, in Gen Z, and all these folks that come after us are looking up and we’re like, the world is gonna end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change," said Obviously-Comatose in January. "And your biggest issue, your biggest issue is how are going to pay for it? — and like this is the war, this is our World War II."

This is like not war, and nothing like, like World War II. But you might give her credence if you're stupid.

Moreover, the fine young cretin even acknowledged that her impossible and outrageously pricey Green New Deal is massively flawed, but, according to her, at least she’s “trying.” This means she’s “the boss.”

They're coming for our guns.

“Like I just introduced the Green New Deal two weeks ago, and it's creating all of this conversation. Why? Because no one else has even tried. Because no one else has even tried. So people are like, 'Oh it's unrealistic. Oh it's vague. Oh it doesn't address this little minute thing,'" she said last month. "And I'm like, 'You try. You do it. Cuz you're not. Cuz you're not. So, until you do it, I'm the boss.' How about that?"

Yes, how about that. Having an elected official who apparently knows as much about science as Bill Nye [the kids'] Science Guy should scare the crap out of us all. Ironically, with people like AOC in government, it's actually not out of the realm of possibility that the world will end in 12 years.

Nye’s scientific background, particularly concerning the climate, is not exactly impressive. National Review's Ian Tuttle explained:

William Sanford Nye’s scientific bona fides consists of an undergraduate degree in mechanical engineering from Cornell, and a stint at Boeing. But you can be anything you want on television, and in the late 1980s, hard at work pursuing a career in comedy, Nye landed a recurring bit as Bill Nye “the Science Guy” on Almost Live!, a Seattle-area sketch-comedy television show, and a role as Christopher Lloyd’s laboratory sidekick on Back to the Future: The Animated Series. Nye then leveraged that success into his namesake PBS Kids show, Bill Nye the Science Guy, which from 1993 to 1998 filmed 100 half-hour episodes, each focused on a particular topic (dinosaurs, buoyancy, germs, &c.) and accompanied by a parody soundtrack (e.g., Episode 75, on invertebrates: “Crawl Away,” by “S. Khar Go” — a parody of “Runaway” by Janet Jackson). Somehow, because of this, Nye is now the go-to authority on exoplanets and dark matter and whether we are living in a computer simulation — and, of course, environmental policy.

Nye, a flaming progressive, knows as much about science as barbers knew about performing surgery in 1830.

In 2017, Nye destroyed what little was left of his credibility with an outrageous Netflix skit dubbed “Sexual Spectrum.” Alongside “Crazy Ex-Girlfriend” actress Rachel Bloom, the duo sang and rapped about "butt stuff," "sex stew," transgenderism, and how sexuality and gender are "on a spectrum," or non-binary.

To sum up, both AOC and Bill Nye have as much credibility in their knowledge of science as a goldfish has of boolean algebra. In a word, both are schmucks.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Kamala Harris not concerned about our money for GND cost

Democratic presidential Kamala Harris is not concerned about your money when it comes to funding the Green New Deal and "Medicare-for-all." It isn't her money and as far as she's concerned, white folks can fork it over and even pay reparations to black Americans for "200 years of slavery," Harris said, as if it was still going on.

The estimated costs for all the crazy proposals, including getting rid of farting cows, gas-driven cars and planes, and our use of all fossil fuels in the next ten years, are estimated to be in the neighborhood of trillions of dollars for each unprecedented proposal, as determined by a nonpartisan study.

Harris, (D-CA) joined Sens. Elizabeth Warren, (D-MA), and Cory Booker, (D-NJ) to co-sponsor the Green New Deal resolution earlier this month. 

The resolution's botched rollout included the release of an official document by New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's [aka Alexandria Occasionally Coherent-Commie] office that promised economic security even for those "unwilling to work," as well as the elimination of "farting cows" and air travel.

Brilliant.

"There's no question we have to be practical. But being practical also recognizes that climate change is an existential threat to us as human beings," Harris bloviated. "Being practical recognizes that greenhouse gas emissions are threat to our air, and threatening our planet. And that it is well within our capacity as human beings to change our behaviors in a way that we can reduce its effect. That's practical. Of course we can afford it."

So we're back to considering Ocasio-Cortez's farting cows because they release methane, a greenhouse gas.

NASA methane in the atmosphere: 

Methane is a hydrocarbon gas that is produced via natural sources and human activities, including the decomposition of wastes in landfills, agriculture, and especially rice cultivation as well as ruminant digestion and manure management associated with domestic livestock. On a molecule-for-molecule basis, methane is a far more active greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, but also one which is much less abundant in the atmosphere. [My italics]

But if the U.S. only accounts for 15 percent of global emissions while India and China account for a much larger amount, then we must consider bombing the crap out of their coal mines to save the planet. 

And let us not forget the reserves in the other top oil producing countries: Saudi Arabia, Russia, Canada, China, Iran, Iraq, the UAE, Brazil and Kuwait. If we stop producing oil, these other nations will fill the vacuum to grow their economies. We need to bomb the crap out of them lest America take a back seat to the world economy. 

Okay, maybe not Canada, eh, but the others for sure. After all, Harris and AOC know that we have a mere twelve years before the world comes to an end and we want to enjoy the two years left if we can implement the GND.

The Comedy News Network's John King asked Harris, the former California prosecutor who screwed her way to the Senate, for her response to conservative arguments that progressive proposals could end up doing more harm than good, by crippling the U.S. economy.

According to the Mercatus Center at George Washington University, for example, the economically illiterate Ocasio-Cortez's plan for universal Medicare would end up costing more than $30 trillion, even after factoring in the sweeping tax hikes that would offset the expense by only roughly $2 trillion. 

Charles Blahous, a senior strategist at the Mercatus Center and an author of the study, later explained that AOC had wildly misinterpreted his study to try to argue that "Medicare-for-all" would save money, because she is better at mixing a Manhattan than representing Queens and the Bronx.

"One of the things that I admire and respect is the measurement that is captured in three letters: ROI," Harris said. "What's the return on investment? People in the private sector understand this really well. It's not about a cost. It's about an investment. And then the question should be, is it worth the cost in terms of the investment potential? Are we going to get back more than we put in?"

You can't invest more than what you have. We'd end up printing more money or borrowing. If you increase the national debt to the degree necessary to even begin to consider this ridiculous idea, we would GND ourselves in a totally bankrupt economy. No country would honor our money or want to do business with us.

The Green New Deal push has seen resistance not only from Republicans, but also some key Democrats. Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI), was asked about the plan to replace planes with high-speed rail and did not seem impressed.

“That would be pretty hard for Hawaii,” she laughed, because it's a stupidly naive idea.

House Speaker Nancy "Dancing Hands" Pelosi similarly appeared to dismiss the plan because Californians live in their cars.

“It will be one of several or maybe many suggestions that we receive,” Pelosi told Politico. “The green dream, or whatever they call it, nobody knows what it is, but they’re for it, right?”

"The Green New Deal? I see it as aspirational. I see it as a jump-start," Amy "Ranch Dressing" Klobuchar said on "Special Report with Bret Baier" earlier this month. "So I would vote yes [on the Green New Deal resolution], but I would also -- if it got down to the nitty-gritty of an actual legislation, as opposed to, 'Oh, here's some goals we have' -- uh, that would be different for me."

In other words, Klobuchar doesn't want to commit to anything and will dance around most issues and chose the issue most popular at the moment if she choses at all.

But Harris said she was looking forward to hashing out the dispute with her rivals in public, during one of the 12 planned Democratic primary debates. Harris added that she enjoys hashing out issues almost as much as she enjoys hash and listening to Snoop Dog and Tupac.

"I look forward to that debate on the debate stage," Harris said. "I look forward to it very much."

In terms of the 2020 debate, the White House hopes that socialism will be the main issue for the Democrats with their call for higher minimum wage and universal benefits, perhaps even for those who refuse to work. 

But Harris emphasizes that her main concern is the concerns of everyday Americans, excluding white people, who she says should have to pay black people for being black and victimized several hundred years ago by not them. 

The big question is: will former President Obama have to pay his black self reparations by his white self? Will most Americans, those whose families have come to America after slavery still have to pay black Americans whose ancestors had not come to America before slavery? 

The whole question is immoral when you are made to pay for the crimes you didn't personally commit. But let's face it, the whole idea is vote-fodder for the greedy who believe it's okay.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

The end is near! We still only have 12 years to live

Global warming is a life and death issue and so is the Green New Deal. Especially the part where all the buildings, commercial and private, must be retrofitted or something, or be knocked down and rebuilt. And the part in the GND that would pay people a 'living wage' even those who refuse to work.

Gun control is also a life or death issue. AR-15 rifles especially are dangerous and used only for killing people; David Hogg says so and he must know because he wears his cap backwards, living the thug life, and he was at school when a gunman, armed with an AR-15, killed some of Hogg's fellow students. Being a witness or a victim makes liberals experts and Hogg is now the gun lobby maven.

Of course, had Scott Peterson, the cop at the school, been armed with an AR-15, and wasn't a freaking p***y, he might have prevented many deaths. But liberals didn't factor that in.

Now the former bartender and current Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has amped up the rhetoric in her push for a Green New Deal. That's the latest  “life and death” issue. She also said we would all be dead in a dozen years, but maybe the GND will save the world.

The star fresh-idiot Democrat fired off a series of tweets Tuesday night about her ridiculous communist proposal disguised as an environmental plan.

She tweeted:

“Don’t mess with our future. When it comes to climate, it’s all our lives at stake. The younger you are, the more consequences you’ll see. It’s life and death for us. And we will fight like it.” 

The New York Communist calling herself a Democratic socialist also attacked the GOP for allegedly ‘doing nothing to stop’ climate change, before turning up the heat on Republicans she accused of trying to sow doubt on the issue.

“They knew early… Do you really think these increasingly regular & horrific wildfires & droughts are a coincidence? That growing regularity of '100-year floods' is an accident? 

“We are losing our homes & loved ones *now.* And GOP doesn’t even care enough to try.”

What the hell is she talking about? Who is losing their homes and loved ones? Where does she come up with this nonsense?

The rising democratic communist/socialist star’s remarks came after Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton blasted the Green New Deal plan and said the media were “complicit” in burying the most radical parts of the deal, which is most of the deal itself.

Cotton, a staunch Republican, appeared on "The Hugh Hewitt Show" on Tuesday and discussed the Green New Deal that aims to implement sweeping changes across the nation to form a communist state where the people owe everything to the government and the government can take it away from them if they don't behave.

Cotton said the media was complicit in hiding a now-infamous FAQ document circulated by the Ocasio-Cortez office, which included lines such as promising a job to “all people of the United States” – including those “unwilling to work” – and making air travel obsolete and eliminate "farting cows."

“I understand the Democrats that proposed this immediately tried to retract that white paper that went along with their resolution,” Cotton pointed out. “And too many people in the media have been complicit in the Stalin-like or 1984 technique of disappearing it, sending it down the memory hole.”

Hey, it worked for Stalin.

Multiple Democratic 2020 candidates such as Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, and Kirsten Gillibrand have endorsed the deal because they are scared to death of Alexandria Occasionally Coherent-Cortex.

“I’m proud to co-sponsor @AOC and @EdMarkey's Green New Deal. We must aggressively tackle climate change which poses an existential threat to our nation,” Harris wrote when announcing her support of the plan, adding in that “The Green New Deal is a bold plan to shift our country to 100% clean and renewable energy.”

It's silly, impractical and immoral.


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Adviser to AOC admits he lied to Tucker Carlson

A top adviser of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez  [aka AOC; aka Alexandria Obvioso-Communista] the congresswoman from New York, finally admitted that he lied about the Green New Deal.

Robert Hockett originally said that the GND did not promise an income for those "unwilling" to work, but in fact it did. He finally admitted that an official "Green New Deal" document posted by Ocasio-Cortez's office contained a guarantee of economic security even for those "unwilling to work" -- but not before he went viral in progressive circles for claiming the exact opposite, repeatedly, in an interview with Fox News' "Tucker Carlson Tonight."

Cornell University Law School Professor Robert Hockett, who counsels Ocasio-Cortez on environmental initiatives, and needs to retake an ethics course, challenged Carlson when he quoted from an outline and list of "frequently asked questions" (FAQ) that had been posted on Ocasio-Cortez's official website. The FAQ was also shared with NPR. 

[You can see the Tucker Carlson video on the first link I post above.]

The FAQ stated that the program will provide "Economic security for all who are unable or unwilling to work," and also noted, "We set a goal to get to net-zero, rather than zero emissions, in 10 years because we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes that fast."

How fast? That fast. Flatulent cows? Farting cows. How many trees? Lots of trees. Where would you place charging stations for electric cars once you get rid of the gas-driven cars? All over.

Stepford wives

This is the kind of wording you'd expect in a junior high school.

The FAQ, which is still available on NPR's website, also stated, "This is a massive transformation of our society with clear goals and timeline." In another section, the FAQ said that it had set a goal of net-zero, rather than zero, national emissions in 10 years “because we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to get rid of farting cows and airplanes that fast.”

Over the weekend, Saikat Chakrabarti, AOC's chief of staff, seemingly confirmed that the FAQ shared with NPR and posted on her website was genuine. Metadata from the document posted by NPR confirmed that Chakrabarti was listed as one of the authors of the FAQ. His language skills only rival the economic insights of AOC.

So now along with babies, cows will also be eliminated. Delightful.

“It appears there was more than one document being discussed yesterday, only one of which I had heard about with any definiteness by last evening after a long day of media appearances – namely, the one referred to by the Congresswoman in her tweet,” Hockett wrote. “I regret that we seem unknowingly to have ended up speaking about different documents for a minute during our longer and otherwise ‘on-the-same-page’ conversation last night.”

Bull crap--he knows exactly what happened--he lied.

For her part, Alexandria Obviosa-Communista blamed Republicans for attacking her. She plays the part of the victim almost as well as Cory Booker plays Spartacus.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Leftist media covering for Alexandria Obviosa-Communista on her Green New Debacle

AOC learns to spell zephyr

Who'd a thought the mainstream media would run damage control for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (DC-NY) on her ridiculous gulag-inspired "Green New Deal" [GND]? Just because the "FAQ" she posted on her website outed her as the Communist she really is [her Kinsley gaffe] should be no reason the far-left media shouldn't protect the Democrats [but I repeat myself] even when their "landmark" plans are obviously insanely impossible to accomplish and would ruin the country in so many ways.

On Saturday, Alexandria Occasionally Coherent-Cortex and her advisers began running a full-scale operation to distract and deflect from criticism of the "Green New Deal," initially lying that conservatives had circulated a handful of "doctored" versions of her FAQ, and then, when that line of attack failed once their lie was exposed, the lie being that the posted FAQ, which suggested, among other things, a universal income even for those "unwilling" to work, was an irrelevant "early draft."

That, of course, was a disgusting lie, the signature kind of lies of the Democratic Party and their media.

But instead of laying the blame where it belonged — squarely at the feet of Obviosa-Communista and her morally challenged advisers, who clearly botched their own Green New Deal rollout — the media immediately blamed conservatives for "pouncing" on the Communist's plan, because they cannot keep themselves from defending to the death a leftist idea.

Leftist digital toilet tissue, Business Insider, provided the most egregious example, accusing conservatives of unfairly "attacking" AOC for "accidentally" leaking a document posted to her website and delivered directly to several members of the news media.



Josh Jordan
✔@NumbersMuncher

Business Insider was ultimately forced to rewrite the headline, which nobody read, and issue a new tweet, which nobody read, after real reporters pointed out that the leak appeared to be far from "accidental."

AOC's team posted the FAQ to the congresswoman's official website, and members of her press team sent a pitch containing the FAQ to a number of high-profile media outlets, including National Public Radio, which posted the document in full on its website as soon as the congresswoman's embargo on the material lifted.

Even The Washington Post, which could not deny that the FAQ appeared in multiple outlets on Thursday and Friday, tried to sow skepticism about the document's validity, calling the sheet a "mystery."

And they wonder why nobody trusts them.




Jeff Stein
✔@JStein_WaPo


The only "mystery" was how the congresswoman was ever elected to office--oh, yeah, she's from New York City. There was no "mystery" because it came directly from AOC's office. But the mainstream media appears not simply unwilling to admit the cutie pie's mistake — or, even, perhaps, the full intent of the "Green New Deal" itself — but that Americans might have been shocked at the official piece of legislation, and not merely a conservative rewrite.

Unable to take the hit, ultimately, Obviosa-Communista and her advisers took partial blame for the document, claiming it was merely a "draft" FAQ that was posted and sent to reporters by mistake. They have promised a more accurate rundown of the Green New Deal legislation.

So the idiot puts drafts on her website? Now that's just as stupid as the "draft" itself.

It's a good thing for the left that they own most of the mainstream media or they would never get elected--even the dog-catcher would be wearing a MAGA hat.


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.





Tweet

Spartacus fights the nazis and goes to the moon on the GND

Let's hope the Democratic hopefuls for the 2020 presidential race keep doing what they're doing--supporting Alexandria Obviosa-Communista's Green New Deal and going as far-left as one can go, and that's even lefter than California.

Sen. Cory Booker (Drama Queen-NJ) on Friday likened Democrat's "bold" effort to implement the Green New Deal to fighting Nazis during World War II and landing on the moon in 1969. To go where no normal man has gone before.

Yes, it's exactly the same thing as fighting the Nazis, but in this case, he wants to fight the Nazis in electric cars built by people who are willing to work, with soldiers not allowed to use assault weapons.

Booker, who launched his presidential campaign last week, is traveling through Iowa to spout histrionics with voters about various issues, including the ridiculous Green New Deal. 

The non-binding resolution was introduced by freshman idiot Rep. Alexandria Obviosa-Communista (CD-NY) and Sen. Ed Markey (MA) on Thursday. This should bode well on Markey's resume if he plans to go for a job as an economics retard.

"We have to deal with this," Spartacus said, his eyes bulging out of their sockets and spittle forming at the corners of his mouth. "Our planet is in peril and we need to be bold! It’s one of the reasons I signed on to the resolution; I co-sponsored the resolution for the Green New Deal," Booker bragged at a campaign event in Mason City, Iowa. 

"There’s a lot of people that are now blowing back on the Green New Deal," he said, [grammatically confusing number, which should be 'there are a lot of people.'] "They’re going, ‘Oh, it’s impractical, oh it’s too expensive, oh it’s all of this.’ If we used to govern our dreams that way, we would have never gone to the moon."

Right--since when does money or practicality factor into a Democrat's plan?

"We need to be bold again in America. We need to have dreams that other people say are impossible. We need to push the bounds of human potential, because that is our history," Booker added, as he tried to sound like JFK but came off sounding like a JERK, who squandered the money his mother gave him for acting lessons.

Booker argued the United States must lead on climate change as it has in the past when the planet was in peril or when Nazi and totalitarian regimes wrecked havoc. Boy, talk about pollution WWII caused.

"We came forward," Booker said, with vigah. "Who came forward to save the planet or continents from financial ruin? We came forward with the Marshall Plan."

Honestly, does anyone actually take this guy seriously?

Markey and Ocasio-Cortez, a self-described democratic socialist, released a 14-page outline for the Green New Deal resolution on Thursday. The framers of the deal call for every building in the United States to be upgraded or replaced for "state-of-the-art energy efficiency." 

The plan calls for reparation for most groups, except white men, and also aims to "overhaul transportation"; its ultimate goal is to replace "every combustion-engine vehicle" in the country, which would include planes and automobiles. It will put a lot of people out of work, but so what--the plan calls for them to get paid too. LOL.

Booker joined several other leftist presidential hopefuls in declaring their support for the Green New Deal, including those who have formed an exploratory committee or announced their candidacy: Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Kamala Harris (D-CA), and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). Sens. Bernie Sanders (Idiot-VT) and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), who is expected to announce her decision to run on Sunday, also signaled support for the resolution, while the folks who have worked for her say she is a horribly mean, disgusting, no good, terrible boss.

Cory's softer, more anti-Semitic side

Booker defended the plan by invoking the pie-in-the-sky lessons he learned in his youth.

"My parents taught me, ‘reach for the moon, reach for the stars, and even if you come up short, at least you're going to be hovering above the ground – you'll be soaring, young man," he said.

His parents should have added: "And don't quit your day job, son. You're not that bright."

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Alexandria Obviosa-Communista adviser caught lying about documents they published

Communist Rep. Alexandria Obviosa-Communista (CD-NY) and her comrades were caught lying about the "Green New Deal" [aka "Red Old Manifesto"] they published on the freshman congresswoman's website after everyone who read it that isn't a communist, and even Democrats who are, laughed until they nearly burst a blood vessel.

In the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section of the document, clearly displayed on her congressional page, it listed loads of crazy, outrageous statements. For example,  that her "Green New Deal" sought to provide economic protections to those who were "unwilling to work," an end to all fossil fuels and nuclear energy, electric cars with charging stations "everywhere" and the elimination of cow farts. 

Seriously. Oh, and "lots of trees" and "access to nature."

On Friday, Obviosa-Communista adviser Robert Hockett appeared on Fox News' "Tucker Carlson Tonight," where he told multiple lies about the FAQ document published by the congresswoman's team. The video below is that interview. Notice how Hockett is trying to weasel out of the truth.

A video published by the far-left, Media Matters, an online propaganda and conservative smearing machine,  showed part of Hockett's untrue claims, which Obviosa-Communista then retweeted to her 3 million leftist Twitter followers.

Online archives show that Obviosa-Communista's team did, in fact, publish the document that said the Green New Deal would provide "economic security for all who are unable or unwilling to work."

Their next step will be to say that they've been hacked, or call on the comrade media to save their lying butts for the sake of the party.

After being thoroughly mocked and laughed at across the political spectrum over the disastrous rollout of her Green New Deal, Obviosa-Communista did what she does best – made false and misleading statements while playing the victim card.

She planned to blame Ben Shapiro, Jonah Goldberg and Israel in general, but her cleanup crew had another idea.

Obviosa-Communista found a couple of examples of Twitter accounts who had tweeted out parody versions of her Green New Deal, and claimed that the Republican Party was secretly behind the attempt to destroy her plan because it was "so strong." Strong as in odor, but in substance, not so much.

"When your #GreenNewDeal legislation is so strong that the GOP has to resort to circulating false versions, but the real one nets 70 House cosponsors on Day 1 and all Dem presidential candidates sign on anyway," the idiot tweeted.

But conservatives need to sit back and relax and let AOC do the job to help the GOP. Hopefully President Trump will not attack her--she is doing a fine job on her own.

I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Alexandria Occasionally Coherent-Cortex responds to Peggy Noonan's observation of her

Rep[ulsive] Alexandrai Occasionally Coherent-Cortex (Dim-NY) wore her straight jacket along with her fellow leftists as President Donald Trump delivered his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday. She looked like a high school kid who walked into a calculus class when she was only up to basic algebra.

Peggy Noonan, the Wall Street Journal columnist, tweeted that the 29-year-old Democrat looked "sullen, teenaged and at a loss" during a night where the freshman rep kept mostly silent and refused to applaud President Trump's remarks as he touted his administration's low unemployment numbers and efforts to cure AIDS and stop sex traffickers. Cortex may like AIDS and sex traffickers based on her lack of response.

After the article by Noonan was published, Cortex, in her Trump-like style, took to Twitter to defend herself.

"Why should I be “spirited and warm” for this embarrassment of a #SOTU? Tonight was an unsettling night for our country. The president failed to offer any plan, any vision at all, for our future. We’re flying without a pilot. And I‘m not here to comfort anyone about that fact," she tweeted.

But Occasionally Coherent-Cortez did clap when Trump recognized the number of women in Congress, as if being born a woman was some kind of personal accomplishment.

Trump should have said something like: "The last time there was this many Democrats wearing white, it was at a KKK meeting."

Trump's call for unity is unlikely to win over many of his "divide and conquer" Democratic critics in Congress. Before he even delivered his speech, California Sen. Kamala Harris, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate whose only qualification is her intersectional credits said, "We will hear insincere appeals to unity."

How does she know what's in Trump's heart? In fact, it would be to Trump's benefit to have even a modicum of unity with both parties.

Also in the audience were several other Democrats running to challenge Trump in 2020, including Cory "Spartacus" Booker of New Jersey, Elizabeth "Dances With Your Money" Warren of Massachusetts and Kirsten "The Weathervane" Gillibrand of New York, who looked as if she were at her own funeral.

Noonan tweeted, "This has been a deeply adept speech in terms of policy. He cut to the muscle on legal and illegal immigration, on abortion and infanticide, on foreign wars. His vow on socialism will be remembered. Great heroes in the balcony, a real American panoply."


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.



Tweet

Some Dems want AOC dumped after 1 term

Highly misinformed but also poor at math and morality, Democratic socialist newbie Rep. Alexandria Occasionally Coherent-Cortex (NY) has come onto the political scene like a clown car out of control in just the few weeks since her "inauguration-coronation."

Her colleagues on Capitol Hill aren't impressed by her high energy, low intellect.

Since defeating Joe Crowley, an incumbent Democrat who quite possibly would follow in the footsteps and flying hands of Nancy Pelosi as House Speaker, Occasionally Coherent-Cortex publicly announced that she has partnered with the far-left Justice Democrats. The group's mission is to primary currently established Democrats who don't swing far enough to the left to suit their socialist desires. 

The Justice Democrats define what justice is, and the world suffers for it.

"We as Justice Democrats [they got their name from "The Justice League" because most of their reading is from comic books] have the chance to really transform the Democratic Party running in competitive primary elections in Democratic-held seats," one of the group’s leaders said in a recent promotional video for their campaign to primary Democrat incumbents. 

"One of the important things that gets told in order to, like, settle us down is, 'I agree with you. We have the same goals,''' Occasionally Coherent-Cortex, like, added. "It's great that everyone thinks these issues are important. We need to make them urgent." 

Like wow.

That "urgency" requires that old faces and voices of less radical Democrats must be voted out to make room for the lunatics who still think Venezuela is an outlier of socialism. 

According to The Hill, pretty little Miss Cortex's public call for more radical candidates to replace her fellow Democrats has "infuriated" her colleagues, some of whom are already floating the idea of finding a primary challenger who can make the youngest woman to ever be elected to Congress a "one-term congressperson."

"At least one House Democrat has been privately urging members of the New York delegation to recruit a local politician from the Bronx or Queens to challenge Ocasio-Cortez," The Hill’s Scott Wong reported. The congressperson obviously has to remain anonymous lest Antifa burn his or her house down.

Wong reported that among those who have begun to look askance at the freshman representative are "many" Congressional Black Caucus members. "Many New York and Congressional Black Caucus lawmakers were also furious with Ocasio-Cortez after a recent Politico report stated she and the grass-roots group aligned with her, Justice Democrats, were considering backing a primary challenge to fellow New York Democrat Hakeem Jeffries, a Black Caucus member and establishment insider who succeeded Crowley as caucus chairman," Wong wrote.

However, Occasionally Coherent-Cortex and the Justice Democrats deny the claims in Politico’s report.

For now, reports Wong, her fellow Democrats are playing nicey nice, at least on the surface.

Aside from pissing off many in the Congressional Black Caucus, the newbie socialist also reportedly angered some among the Congressional Hispanic Caucus with her plan to help the Justice Democrats take out centrist incumbent Dem. Henry Cuellar (TX). "We’re going to protect our members and we’re going to protect our own. Full stop," said former Hispanic Caucus whip Rep. Pete Aguilar (CA), Wong notes. "There are plenty of [swing] races and seats that we can play in, and we want to devote our resources to that."

Cortex ought to spend some time in Venezuela--at least long enough to have to go to the toilet and find that there's no toilet paper. Maybe have dinner there with an average family and discover the meat had a name--Vagabundo [aka Rover].

I hope that 2019 will be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

Senate Dems frustrated over Alexandria Occasionally Coherent Cortex

AOC after someone said, "Look, a dead bird"

She can dance, she can cook and she can tweet. But she isn't very good at math and many of the friends she hangs out with are terrorists fans and anti-Semites, [but I repeat myself].

Rep. Alexandria Occasionally Coherent-Cortex (D-soc-NY) still needs to ask directions to find her office, but she, like a teenager, knows everything and Democratic senators are frustrated with her lack of basic knowledge about most things. They say her views aren't in line with those of their constituents. Actually her views are more in line with Joe Stalin.

Since becoming famous [mostly for her dancing and lack of math skills] Cortex has accused Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, of "death," attacked the media and fact checkers for checking her "facts."

She also proposed a 70 percent socialist-style tax rate for the evil wealthy because she just does not like them and believes it would somehow pay for free healthcare, free college, free Skittles, whatever.

Centrist Democrats are worried about the party adopting these and other untenable positions for their platform, saying it will hurt their chances for reelection in upcoming races, the Hill reports. But it should be popular with their unemployed, lack of motivation and dead-spirited base.

Her Green New Deal is a clear example of how she wants to implement socialism into the fabric of our economy. She actually thinks that taking away the budget for the military [before Russia, Iran and China decide to walk all over us] will pay the $40 TRILLION for her socialist programs. All the money spent on the military, since the country was formed, would not come close to that figure and she doesn't have a real clue about how to pay for the spending she wants.

Democrats have to pick up at least three seats in 2020 to gain control of the Senate. In order to do so they will need to focus on winning in centrist or Republican-leaning states like Alabama, Colorado, New Hampshire, Iowa and North Carolina by pretending to be conservatives.

Some of the bipartisan issues Democrats would prefer to focus on in those states include helping veterans, lowering health care costs, and focusing on the federal deficit, but Cortex is driving the party to focus on other issues, according to some lawmakers and wants to defund the military.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D., NH), who faces a competitive reelection in 2020, said Cortex's "views don’t represent a lot of my constituents." It turns out that a lot of her constituents are not communists and have jobs.

Sen. Doug Jones (D-Ala.), one of the most vulnerable incumbents up for reelection in 2020, said he's not happy the idiot is becoming a sort of spokesperson for the party, saying, "I think it skews what’s really there for the Democratic Party."

In the House, Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL) said last summer that "Meteors fizz out. What she will learn in this institution is that it’s glacial to begin with, and therefore no matter how far you rise, that’s just how far you will ultimately get your comeuppance."

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), who won reelection in a state President Donald Trump won by 42 points, echoed Jones' sentiment, saying that while liberals in the party might be getting widespread media attention now, it will be the centrist Democrats who get bills passed into law. In other words, the swamp-dwellers.

Cortex hasn't been shy about criticizing Trump, but centrist Democrats have warned the approach isn't a recipe for victory in 2020. On the other hand, it seems that even centrist Democrats have little to show for a plan other than criticizing the entire GOP with their claims of sexism, bigotry, homophobia, xenophobia, Islamophobia, phobiaphobia bull droppings.

Former Sens. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) and Joe Donnelly (D-IN), who both lost during the 2018 midterms, expressed concern "Trump bashing" will hurt Democrats' chances of taking back the Senate and defeating Trump in 2020. This, they believe, may have something to do with the notion that the nation elected him president of the United States.

"I worry that the Democrats are majoring in Trump bashing," she began, unaware that Democrats often majored in lesbian dance theory. "And we’ll have to do more than that in order to win the confidence of enough Americans to regain the Senate and importantly the presidency," McCaskill said.

Will 2019 be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint? Let's hope so, because politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet