Senate unanimously moves to reverse “Slob Rule"

The Senate Democrats must have been embarrassed after Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) moved to allow the formal dress code to deteriorate into the “Fetterman Grunge” style of dress in the upper chamber. But more likely, the left wasn’t really embarrassed as they were worried their constituents were upset by the slovenly look Schumer was now allowing in order to accommodate their brain-injured colleague Senator from Pennsylvania.

On Wednesday, the Senate passed a bipartisan resolution to restore the formal dress in the upper chamber after the country was upset with them for loosening the unwritten rule.

Senators are now required to dress like grownups and wear business attire on the floor, and Fetterman, who has always dressed like he was a cool kid on the block, will again have to vote in his baggy shorts and hoodie from the senate cloak room where he will be watched carefully so as not to go into anyone’s coat pockets for loose change.

Majority Leader Chuck “Nostrils” Schumer confirmed the rollback from the policy he had initiated which was immediately dubbed the “Fetterman Rule."

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), who publicly split with Fetterman over the slob’s lax wardrobe, sponsored the resolution, along with Sen. Mitt Romney (RINO-UT).

“As senators, we should demonstrate a high level of reverence for the institution in which we serve—and our attire is one of the most basic expressions of that respect,” Romney, who is loved by the Democrats said in a statement.

“I’m proud to stand with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to call for a return to a level of dress becoming of the Senate,” the RINO continued.

Earlier Wednesday, before the resolution was passed, Fetterman assured his Democratic colleagues that he would wear a suit while speaking or presiding over the Senate floor.

Last week, Fetterman took advantage of the short-lived loosened dress code and presided over Senate proceedings with his classic baggy shirt and large shorts and was an embarrassment to everyone except Volodymyr Zelensky, who wasn’t there.

He’s also known for donning a hoodie in the Capitol complex area and picking his nose in the Rotunda.

But under the resolution, men on the Senate floor must wear “a coat, tie and slacks or other longer pants.”

Many senators were extremely upset with the lowered standards and Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) threatened to wear a bikini.

Tweet

So, here's the deal: he's running again with, you know who

Our so called president, Joe Biden, has made it official--he's running for a second term and is being told to take Kamala Harris along with him for the ride. Should he win and live to see the end of his presidency, he will be 86 years old. Yes, he will 86 his career and wander off into the sunset as the blithering, confused and highly unintelligent career politician the left knows and loves.

The "Big Guy" released the announcement in a video shot earlier this month at his Rehoboth Beach vacation home in Delaware as he slept beside his ambitious wife, Doctor Jill Biden.

Biden's approval rating has been in the low 40% range due to his administration's foreign and domestic fusterclucks, which he personally should not be blamed for as he is not the person making the big decisions. 

“Joe and Kamala are running for reelection, and we need your help to spread the word. Share this video with your friends!” the video, entitled “Fweedom,” announces. 

The video begins with a scene of the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol, followed by an image of an abortion rights protest as Biden warns ominously that “MAGA extremists are lining up” to threaten democracy and save the lives of the unborn.

Then the video unashamedly lies about the GOP claiming, “Cutting Social Security that you’ve paid for your entire life while cutting taxes for the very wealthy. Dictating what health care decisions women can make, banning books, and telling people who they can love. All while making it more difficult for you to be able to vote.”

Of course the GOP is not cutting Social Security because that would be politically suicidal. 

And they are not dictating health care decisions a woman can make because killing the unborn is the opposite of a health care decision for the baby. There is no state in the union that doesn't allow a woman to terminate her pregnancy if it really threatens her life, but that's as rare as the left once claimed abortion should be performed.

Banning books is also a blatantly false accusation being made in regard to Gov. Ron DeSantis who is only banning inappropriate sexualized books in children's public school libraries, the only place where they are considered inappropriate because schools are not meant to teach cultural Marxism.

Finally, the left has again lied about the idea that the GOP tells people who they can and cannot love. It's a total fabrication which they intentionally mislabeled the "Don't Say Gay Bill" in Florida. The real name of the bill is "Parental Rights in Education."

So what does the bill really do?

According to its text, House Bill 1557 is an attempt to “reinforce the fundamental right of parents to make decisions regarding the upbringing and control of their children.“ It thus prohibits schools from keeping parents in the dark and must disclose to them "critical decisions affecting a student's mental, emotional, or physical health or well-being." Schools could withhold certain information if it's believed the disclosure would result in abuse, neglect or abandonment.

Another major provision is that it prohibits “classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity” in kindergarten through third grade. And it could prohibit the teaching of those topics in higher grades “in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate” according to state standards.

The left would like total control of your kids, but this bill keeps it in the hands of the parents.

Okay, so here's the deal. Biden, or whoever is behind the curtain, has decided to have Kamala Hahahaharris as his running mate because she is as capable as Biden in running the country. The dynamic duo face a primary challenge from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and may also have to deal with California Governor Gavin Newsom and W.Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, both who have not announced as yet. However, the Democratic National Committee has already said it will not sponsor anyone who is not fully behind comrade Biden.

Biden is scheduled to meet with key donors, not including Communist China, on Friday. His campaign message is likely to emphasize his “Build Back Better” because it's easy for him to memorize. 

The Republican field could expand, but as it shapes up now, Biden is likely to face a rematch with former President Trump, who leads by a wide margin in polls. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is expected to announce his bid in the coming weeks and could pose a challenge to Trump.

Biden is already the oldest president in history and needs almost as much vacation time as he does in the Oval Office pretending to make decisions. A recent Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll indicated that about 25% of Americans want him to run again. It seems there is always around the same percentage of Americans who have their head up their nether regions. His approval rating is 43% in the Real Clear Politics polling average.

It currently looks as if former president Trump will be Biden's presidential challenger, but Gov. Ron DeSantis may run and has yet to announce.

Tweet

Democrats betray Manchin: can I get an LOL

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) went along with his party last month and got him to cave on the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act. This shocked many Republicans as well as a few Democrats, because he seemed to have been the voice of reason on the Left and we all thought he was going to vote against this ridiculous bill.

However, in July, Sen. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and his substantial nostrils was joined by Manchin to announce support for the $740 billion fiscally irresponsible bill whose title is an oxymoron. This bill will not only not reduce inflation, it will likely increase it and it's actually about climate change and drunken sailor spending to deal with it. The bill will subsidize green energy programs, dramatically expand the army of the IRS, and raise taxes on the middle class while lying about it as they do it.

Manchin was promised by alleged President Joe Biden and other Democratic liars that they will facilitate the approval of a gas pipeline in West Virginia. In order to do that, they would have to pass legislation that would “overhaul the permitting process for energy infrastructure,” according to The American Prospect, a liberal website.

But as it turns out, House progressives don't want to support something that  “could undercut the IRA’s down payment on clean energy by accelerating approval for energy projects that could ramp up U.S. fossil fuel production and exports of natural gas,” The American Prospect reported. So Manchin is screwed, just like he did to the country.

House Democrats were reportedly angry that they didn't get called on to negotiate with Manchin, according to The Washington Times. 

Now they don't plan to honor the agreement and this hopefully will hurt Manchin with West Virginia voters.

In a statement to the Prospect, Michigan's Jew-hating POS Democrat Rep. Rashida Tlaib, wrote:

“Handshake deals made by others in closed rooms do not dictate how I vote, and we sure as hell don’t owe Joe Manchin anything now. He and his fossil fuel donors already got far too much in the IRA … and we will vote this dirty deal down, one way or another.”

What a woman of integrity, love and chutzpah.

Other Democrats joined in on the Manchin trashing.

California Rep. Jared Huffman said he refuses to be “steamrolled into a bunch of fossil fuel giveaways just because Manchin cut a deal in a closed room with Chuck Schumer,” the Times reported.

I think I may have just wet myself.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Welcome to reality, Joe. You gave away your reputation for integrity, honesty and fairness and made a deal with the devil Democrats and they sold you out. 

I hope you are satisfied, you freaking hypocrite.

Tweet

Sen. Schumer's parents set poor example by not aborting him

Democrat Senator Charles Schumer (NY) is a lucky man. His parents were terrible role models when it came to abortion and chose to go forward with allowing him to live. But Chucky turned the tables on them and their memory: he put forth a bill that would legalize killing babies through all nine months of pregnancy for any reason whatsoever.

So if a mother sees in the sonogram that the baby is a girl and she wanted a boy, or vice versa, she can kill it and have another go at it. 

But as it turned out, Chuck's luck did not hold out and the bill failed in a 51-49 vote.

The bill was oxymoronically called the Women's Health Protection Act. It has nothing to do with health, and it also allows for the killing of future women as well as future men. It passed in the House of Representatives last September by Democrats all of whom refused to follow in their parents' footsteps and were not aborted.

Now with the U.S. Supreme Court poised to overturn Roe v. Wade, Schumer and other Democrats fear that babies who are not killed will eventually grow up, learn to drive, and take up too many parking spots. Schumer claims that his bill will protect the right to kill babies anywhere across the country for any reason and believes he's doing the Lord's work of dismembering babies and vacuuming out their brains. 

Words like 'abortion' or 'women's health care,' or 'termination of a pregnancy' doesn't change reality.

Taxpayer funded NPR noted:

“The Women’s Health Protection Act would protect a person’s ability to decide to continue or end a pregnancy and would enshrine into law health care providers’ ability to offer abortion services ‘prior to fetal viability’ without restrictions imposed by individual states, like requiring special admitting privileges for providers or imposing waiting periods."

Safe, rare and legal were the slogans of the past. This bill would legalize the murder of babies after fetal viability, and in all cases isn't safe for the baby, even if she or he survives the attempts to kill it after passing through the birth canal.

The left claims that ending Roe v. Wade would end democracy, but it's exactly the opposite as it takes the states and the voters out of the decision regarding abortion policies.

Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) also blasted the bill in a statement to The Daily Wire:

“Under the Democrats’ bill, a pre-born child, simply for the crime of being ‘unwanted’, or ‘inconvenient’, or ‘unplanned’, could be subjected to brutal dismemberment procedures, in which the unborn child bleeds and feels excruciating pain as she dies from being pulled apart limb from limb. 

“The Democrats’ abortion bill would codify an extreme abortion regime that is aligned with brutal nations such as China and North Korea — which would impose abortion up until the moment of birth without any limits in all 50 states. In a nutshell, this radical bill would make the United States of America one of the most dangerous places in the world to be a pre-born child.”

All 50 Republicans voted against this heartless bill. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) also voted against the bill for being too broad in its scope, not for its intended consequences to the unborn, which is the real reason to vote against it.

* * *

 Subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

If the Left cares so much about blacks and other minorities in this country, why are they eager to allow for the one thing that kills the majority of blacks and minorities? About one million babies are killed each year in this country and a disproportional number of them are black and Hispanic.

Tweet

GOP block Dems' election bills, setting up a 'what the Chuck' showdown over nuclear option

The not insane Senate Republicans Wednesday used the filibuster to block the insane and self-serving Democrat election legislation, denying it the 60 votes it required to advance and set up a potential "nuclear option" set up by Sen. Chuck "I Once Supported the Filibuster When We Needed It" Schumer. 

Majority Leader Schumer planned to use a party-line vote to lower the filibuster threshold for some legislation to a simple majority with the hope of some day taking complete control over the country and never giving it up.

Every Republican voted against a procedural vote on the legislation, even RINOs like Adam Kisinger and Liz Chaney, and all Democrats voted for it ending with a 49 - 51 vote after Chucky changed his vote to the Democrat side in order to preserve his right to bring the vote up in the future.

Now the Senator from New York is probably going to initiate a "nuclear option" to rid the 60-vote threshold completely, so that Democrats can ruin the country in its entirety.

"We will all confront a critical question: Shall members of this chamber do what is necessary to pass these bills?" Schumer, along with his giant nostrils, said on the Senate floor Wednesday. "It is my hope that courage awakens within the heart of our Republican colleagues before the day is out. But if the Senate cannot protect the right to vote… under the existing rules, then the Senate rules must be reformed."

Courage? The Democrats don't have the courage to follow the concept of a republican form of government and would like to rule using the tyranny of the majority.

Schumer, who had once advocated for the filibuster when it suited his purpose added: "For those who feel that the filibuster is a good thing and helps bring us together, I would ask this question: Isn't the protection of voting rights, the must fundamental wellspring of this democracy, more important?"

This has nothing to do with the protection of voting rights. Black people and other minorities are just as capable of getting a personal ID and finding a polling place as White people. The election of Barack Obama certainly proves that notion.

Sens. Joe Manchin, (D-WV), and Kyrsten Sinema, (D-AZ), oppose altering the filibuster through a party-line vote, and that somehow gave them the title of "racist" by their Democrat colleagues. See, the word "racist" now means doing anything the left doesn't like or voting the "wrong way."

Schumer, who will be doing his own "Joe Biden Skivvy Assault" if he gets a primary challenge by Rep. Alexandria Obviously-Commie, is expected to go ahead with the gambit anyway after promising this week to get all senators "on the record" on the issue.

To initiate the nuclear option, Schumer can call a "point of order." He would then ask Vice President Kamala Hahaharris, who presides over the Senate, whether the threshold to advance legislation is 60 votes or 51. Harris would then respond that the threshold is 60, and then Schumer can appeal her ruling. 

The Senate would then enter into a vote of whether to "affirm" the chair's ruling – that the Senate filibuster threshold is 60. That means most Democrats will vote "no" while and all Republicans are expected to vote "yes."

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Most likely, the chair's ruling will be affirmed and the Republicans and handful of Democrats who vote in the negative will win the vote, preserving the filibuster.

But with the way things are in the nation, you never know how this will turn out.

Tweet

Pope Kamala 'will not absolve' wayward senators who refuse to obey their orders

Vice President Kamala Hahahaharris emphatically said through her nose that she is "not going to absolve" Sens. Kirsten Sinema (D-AZ) and Joe Manchin (D-WV) of their sins whereby they are voting in line with the people who voted them into office. "They are standing in the way of progress. If we can get rid of the filibuster, they tell me that it will give the Democratic Party the power to move forward with our agenda," she honked.

She also suggested that certain people are in the way of passing the Freedom to Vote Act, which is a bill designed to allow people of all colors and creeds to vote, even if they had the misfortune of dying, or if they desire to vote for friends and family. The bill also allows people with a poor sense of direction to simply cast their ballot into a mailbox or hand it to a stranger willing to drop it off for them.

What could possibly go wrong?

"It's unconstitutional to keep black people from having to obtain an ID. Many of them don't know how to go about getting one and you're putting an unfair burden on their lives," Harris asserted before laughing for a full 32 seconds.

Harris claimed the United States Senate has the chance and "responsibility to pass these bills" so the alleged President can sign them as directed. "And the resistance to doing that today, or any day, at this time, will not deter us from getting it done, with our without the votes today, I daresay," she rapped.

A so-called reporter asked a followup question about Sens. Manchin and Sinema, to which Harris said with a curious smirk, "As I've said before, there are 100 members of the United States Senate, and I'm not going to absolve — nor should any of us — absolve any member of the United States Senate from taking on a responsibility to follow through on the oath that they all took to support and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Harris has previously said that legislators [i.e, Manchin and Sinema] who do not go along with Biden's voting rights legislation are violating their oath to vote her conscience.

Steve Doocy of Fox News  handed Harris a pocket copy of the U.S. Constitution and a dictionary turned to the word "democracy."

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

"When we have the discussion about who’s responsible, I will not absolve the 50 Republicans in the United States Senate from responsibility for upholding one of the most basic and important tenets of our democracy, which is free and fair elections and access to the ballot for all eligible voters," Harris said to NBC News last week.

After Brain Flushings "did the Google," we learned that a Vice President does not have the power to absolve anyone of how they vote, especially when they are members of the opposing Party. Voting is actually a basic tenet of our democracy and is also why the United States is a republic, as opposed to a pure democracy--to prevent the tyranny of the majority-- you know, like if 2 lions and 1 deer had to vote on what's for dinner.

Tweet

"Wind Beneath My Dress" singer makes disgusting remarks about W Virginians being "poor, illiterate"

It's one thing to disagree with a person's political ideology, and quite another to attack that person ad hominem along with the people of his state because of those disagreements. 

That is exactly what Bette Midler did when Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) voted the way his constituents wanted him to vote: against the "drunken sailor in a whorehouse" spending bill known as Build Back Better, which would have cost the taxpayers somewhere in the neighborhood of three trillion dollars with a future spending that would just keep going and going.

On Monday, Midler took to Twitter to attack Joe Manchin--she tweeted:

"What #JoeManchin, who represents a population smaller than Brooklyn, has done to the rest of America, who wants to move forward, not backward, like his state, is horrible. He sold us out. He wants us all to be just like his state, West Virginia. Poor, illiterate and strung out."

What a piece of work.

While Brooklyn has 2.9 people living under the fist of Mayor Bill de Blasio for another few days, Manchin's constituency of about 1.8 million people are represented by him and his vote against BBB was for them, not for people in Brooklyn. That's what he is elected to do, not what Bette Midler wants him to do.

And it's no big surprise that he voted against the BBB--he said he would months ago if his party didn't cut the spending down. Why are they acting surprised?

After her anti-West Virginia tweet, Midler, 76, began taking a lot of heat for the bile she spewed. She realized the best thing to do would be to apologize for her thoughtless remarks about West Virginians she cruelly judged but never even met:

"I apologize to the good people of WVA for my last outburst," she tweeted. "I’m just seeing red; #JoeManchin and his whole family are a criminal enterprise. Is he really the best WV has to offer its own citizens? Surely there’s someone there who has the state’s interests at heart, not his own!"

So her apology included an attack on Joe Manchin again, and now his family. 

What a grody shoal [see Urban Dictionary] Midler shows herself to be, and it wasn't long before she attacked Manchin again. "His indifference is immense. Like the rest of his family, he hasn’t a shred of conscience," she wrote.

It's obvious Midler knows nothing about Joe Manchin other than the fact that he didn't vote the way she wanted, or the way people who are the least affected by gross inflation wanted him to vote. Attacking his family is a childish reaction and speaks volumes about Midler's offscreen character.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Manchin appeared on "Fox News Sunday," He told host Bret Baier that he had spoken to alleged President Biden, House Speaker Nancy "Dancing Hands" Pelosi (D-CA) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck "Nostrils" Schumer (D-NY) but they couldn't reach an agreement in BBB. They wanted to blow out the spending and go full commie and this didn't sit well with Manchin, who had said months ago that he would not vote for such an irresponsible piece of legislation. 

"I've done everything humanly possible," Manchin said, explaining how hard he has worked to try to reach an acceptable compromise on the bill, but the left wouldn't budge and neither would he.

Manchin said that with inflation increasing, the national debt, "geopolitical unrest," and the current pandemic, the Build Back Better bill by Biden [or his puppet master] was too much to accept.

Meanwhile, Bette Midler is still a pompous ass who knows what is actually in the BBB bill as much as Alexandria Obviously-Commie knows about economics.

Tweet

Potty mouth Omar launches vulgar tirade on Joe Manchin

If you don't follow in lockstep, progressives will attack you and cancel you if they can. Free thinking is out of the question for socialists because if you have an intelligent debate with them, they will lose and they can't tolerate losing, which is why you'll never see the squad, as they call themselves, on Fox News or going head-to-head with the likes of a Ben Shapiro, for example.

Rep[ulsive] Ilhan Omar (D-socialist-MN) lost her s*** on Sunday in response to Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) after he told Fox News' Bret Baier that he will not vote in support of President Biden't multi-trillion dollar Build Back Better bill.

“And you know, my concerns I had, and I still have these concerns and where I’m at right now, the inflation that I was concerned about, it’s not transitory, it’s real, it’s harming every West Virginian,” Manchin told the outlet. “It’s making it almost difficult for them to continue, to go to their jobs, the cost of gasoline, the cost of groceries, the cost of utility bills — all of these things are hitting in every aspect of their life. And you start looking at — then you have the debt that we’re carrying, $29 trillion, you have also the geopolitical unrest that we have. You have the COVID — the COVID variant, and that is wreaking havoc again, people are concerned. I’ve been with my family, I know everyone is concerned.”

In other words, as a representative of his state, he will represent what the people want, and since West Virginia is a "red state," he will vote accordingly--that's what representatives are elected to do.

“And I cannot vote to continue with this piece of legislation. I just can’t. I’ve tried everything humanly possible. I can’t get there,” Manchin continued. “This is a no on this legislation. I have tried everything I know to do. And the president has worked diligently. He’s been wonderful to work with. He knows I’ve had concerns and the problems I’ve had and, you know, the thing that we should all be directing our attention towards, the variant, a COVID that we have coming back at us in so many different aspects in different ways, it’s affecting our lives again.”

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Omar, an anti-Semitic Somali immigrant who likely married her own brother, responded to Manchin’s remarks during an interview on MSNBC, saying, “I mean, we all knew that Senator Manchin couldn’t be trusted” [to vote the Party line in spite of what his constituents want].  

“The excuses that he just made, I think, are complete bulls**t,” Omar said, her lack of decorum appalling and unprofessional. “It is really disheartening to hear him say that he has been trying to get there for the people of West Virginia because that’s a complete lie. The people of West Virginia would greatly benefit from their families having access to long-term elderly care and care for folks with disabilities. They would benefit from the expansion of the child tax credits; they will benefit from having access to pre-k. There are just so many things that, you know, the people of West Virginia desperately need. And we know that he is not working on behalf of their interests, and I really am just completely disappointed and disgusted by his reasoning.”

But of course, nobody will benefit from runaway inflation. 

The Left knows as much about economics as a frog knows about algebra. 

Tweet

Alexandria Obviously-Confused on $3.5 trillion bill: 'the problem' is "this conversation shouldn't be about numbers"

Rep. Alexandria Obviously-Confused (Duh-NY) aka: "Sandy from da Bronx" was interviewed by her sisters at the Communist Broadcasting System (CBS) "News" on Sunday [while her abuela has to make do in a house destroyed by a hurricane that AOC refused to help her with repairs]. The discussion was on the $3,500,000,000,000 social spending bill, a spending bill so large that it would take 110,985 years to count to at one second intervals to reach that amount, and even longer than Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders had been alive combined.

Obviously-Confused doesn't think the amount asked for is the point of the argument because she doesn't think. She has no concept of how much money the Democrats are asking for and believes the propaganda they're putting out there that it's going to cost "zero" dollars. AOC also believes talking about the amount would make the Democrats look bad, and on that point, she's right. But so would the notion that it would cripple our economy and ruin the economy of future generations.

“The head of your caucus, the progressive caucus, was on another network this morning and Rep. Jayapal [she's the one that looks like a Señor Wences hand puppet] said $1.5 trillion is just too small,” host Margaret Brennan said. “That’s the number that Senate moderates, Joe Manchin in particular, want to get down to. President Biden, according to our reporting from Ed O’Keefe, our correspondent, says you’re going to have to settle for about $2 trillion. Is that an acceptable ceiling for you?”

“So here’s where I think the problem is,” Obviously-Confused began. “It’s that when we talk about top line numbers, there’s a lot that is hidden in that discussion. And so the reason why this conversation shouldn’t be about numbers, but it should be about what substantive programs are willing to be excluded or that–”

“That’s coming from the White House,” Brennan interjected half intelligently.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

“Yeah, but the White House isn’t making the demands to exclude universal childcare or universal pre-K,” the halfwit responded.  “The budget bill that House progressives are trying to fight for, the Biden Build Back Better agenda, includes universal pre-K, free community college, expansion of Medicare; we’re fighting for expansion of Medicaid. And these are the things that we are saying, in addition to the very real climate threat that we have, emissions reductions, are worth standing up for.”

And the money for these projects isn't remotely covered by the billionaires and [make-believe] trillionaires the left now pretends exists. If they handed all their money they make annually to the government in taxes, it still wouldn't cover the cost of this bill, not to mention all the hidden things inside of it.

Why should people be forced to fund things they morally object to like abortion or transgender ball-removing surgeries, for example? There is nothing about socialism that is moral, but it sounds as if it is.

Tweet

Joy Reid needs to do her homework: thinks Manchin and Sinema are Reps. up for re-election in 2022

In a blatant display of her IQ

MSNBC host of the eponymous "ReidOut" Joy Reid didn't do her homework before opening her mouth. She was mocked for her comment that Senators Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) are liable to lose their senate seats in the 2022 midterm elections due to their refusal to go along with their party's ridiculous budget proposal.

The thing is, both senators are not up for re-election until 2024.

It's good to know Reid doesn't do her research and that it carries over to most of her opinions, so we really don't need to take her seriously. Then again, neither do we need to take MSNBC seriously, or CNN. You know when they're adamant about a story and you keep hearing it repeated almost verbatim, that's it bullcrap.

"Of course House progressives could easily say to Joe Manchin & Kyrsten Sinema: ‘fine. Good luck in your midterm elections with zero infrastructure bills to show because if the big bill dies, yours does too.’ Those House seats are likely safer than WV & AZ," Reid tweeted to go along with an Axios report that Manchin feels Congress should delay President Biden’s $3.5 trillion social-spending package until 2022.

House seats? Is that what they're calling Senate seats now?

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Washington Post reporter Seung Min Kim gently informed Reid that she was mistaken about 2022 and the far-left chowderhead was quickly mocked by others for the tweet. To her credit, she didn't claim her account had been hacked like she did initially after getting caught a few years ago after getting outed regarding homophobic posts on her blog. She later admitted that it was unlikely she was hacked, but she also claimed not remembering having written the hateful comments.

Republican communications strategist Matt Whitlock sarcastically asked, "Do you have anyone that works in politics on your staff?"

"Well, besides Manchin and Sinema being in the Senate and not the House. And… not being up for re-election until 2024, this is a bang-up observation," Fox News contributor Joe Concha responded.

Journalist Ryan James Girdusky bluntly said, "Manchin and Sinema aren't up for re-election during the midterms you idiot."

Conservative activist Ned Ryun responded: "She’s not the brightest bulb, folks. But I think we all pretty much knew that already."

MSNBC didn't care that Reid had a history of homophobic posts. She was a Black woman, thus putting her high on the intersectionality strata as a poor victim who much be believed. They not only kept her, they gave her a weekend gig hosting a 7 p.m. slot and had also been involved with MSNBC's political coverage last year, if the first mention wasn't funny enough. She apparently knows as much about politics as Alexandria Obviously-Commie knows about economics and "fair share."

She has also referred to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as "Uncle Thomas." She is nothing more than a shameless race hustler in the spirit of Al Sharptongue, who she is apparently not sleeping with as far as we know.

Tweet

AOC blames Manchin for NYC flood deaths

Cartoon heroine Rep. Alexandria Openly-Commie (Democratic Socialist-NY) attacked Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) in the most disgusting way a person can attack another--by blaming him for the deaths of New York City flood victims. That's even worse than calling everyone you don't like a racist.

This idiot in lipstick tried to blame Manchin for the dozen flooding deaths caused by Tropical Storm Ida, in spite of the many warnings the city received from the U.S. Weather Bureau and local forecasters.

"Manchin has weekly huddles w/ Exxon & is one of many senators who gives lobbyists their pen to write so-called 'bipartisan' fossil fuel bills," the democratic socialist lunatic said. "It’s killing people. Our people. At least 12 last night. Sick of this ‘bipartisan’ corruption that masquerades as clear-eyed moderation."

Personally, those who died passed away in the borough she represents--it's her fault.

Then she added: "Fossil fuel corps & dark money is destroying our democracy, country, & planet. All day our community has been pulling bodies out of homes from the flood. Entire families. And we’re supposed to entertain lobbyist talking points about why we should abandon people & do nothing? No."

AOC was upset because Manchin wrote an op-ed and expressed his opposition to the crazy $3.5 trillion spending debacle supported by Democrats who don't care if they blow out the spending and create inflation like we have never experienced before. AOC should focus on her farting cows and do a study, up close and personal.

Also jumping into the fray against Manchin was anti-Semite Rep. Rashida "MF" Tlaib (D-MI) who told him to look into the faces of her suffering residents. [I was more struck looking in the face of her young son after Tlaib called then President Trump, a "motherf***er." Stuck because the kid didn't bat an eye; must be used to mommy's vulgarity.]

"Instead of writing op-eds, why don't you look into the faces of my residents who have had their basements flooded with sewage multiple times and their power out for days, Senator Manchin. We deserve better," the anti-Zionist, Palestinian terrorism sympathizer advised.

And how will passing this crazy spending package save lives, keep basements from flooding, and the power on when only a tiny fraction of the bill is aimed at infrastructure? 

It's a farce.

The tweets underscored mounting tension within the Democratic Party after the Supreme Court dismissed an attempt to halt Texas' restrictive abortion law. That move prompted Ocasio-Cortez and others to call for the Senate to pack the courts as a way of thwarting democracy . . . again.

If the GOP cannot take back the House, and hopefully the Senate, there's something wrong with the GOP.

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

Tweet

Squadette Cori Bush demands Manchin votes her way or the highway

Cori Bush and her hanging mask

Gone are the days when Congressional personage voted the way they wanted to vote in order to abide by the wishes of their constituents. Now they must vote in line with the demands made by a group of socialist women who call themselves the "Squad."

There used to be a tv show called "Racket Squad" -- if you heard of them, you're no spring chicken. The current Squad is populated by fairly young women who hate Republicans, conservatives, Jews, Christians, the military, police, White people in general, the flag, Israel, the U.S.A., statues, and pro-life groups. 

If I left anything out, please comment.

These angry women, on the other hand,  tend to love Antifa, Black Lives Matter, illegal immigrants, high taxes, Hamas, Palestine, rioting after cops return fire at armed Black thugs who resist arrest and try to kill them, Karl Marx, the LGBTQ+2WOCKADOO community, cancel culture, and killing unborn babies, most of whom are Black or other minorities.

Now the Far-Left Squad is going after Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WVA) after he said that he opposes the Left's highest priority legislation called the For the People Act. [When the Left uses words, think the opposite of what those words usually mean. In this case the 'People' is the Democrat Party.]

This legislation is a partisan sweeping overhaul of the election system in the nation and it would divide the country even more than it already is [thanks to Barack Obama]. Manchin said on Sunday that he refuses to go along with it, and the Left is attacking him for having his own mind--he knows that it's too partisan.

Rep[ugnant]. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY), called Manchin the "new Mitch McConnell." Rep[ulsive]. Alexandria Obviously-Commie (D-NY), accused the Manchin of backing GOP "voter suppression," which is exactly the opposite of what he's doing. Rep[rehensible]. Mondaire Jones (D-NY) said Manchin is trying to "preserve Jim Crow," which is actually a Democratic thing.

Missouri Rep. Cori Bush, a Black Lives Matter leftist Marxist activist before entering Congress this year, said Manchin should just fall in line with the rest of his party "or get out of our way."

Yes, Joe, march to the Left's drum and lose all your scruples and soul. Let the federal government control presidential elections, allow for ballot harvesting, and ditch the filibuster so the Democrats can get rid of all the checks and balances that were put in place by the founders to quell corruption and your Party can have absolute power forever. 

Without the filibuster, the last bastion of hope for balance, the Democratic majority Senate could pass legislation with a simple majority. Washington D.C. would become a state, maybe even Puerto Rico as well. Guns could be made illegal and police reform could eliminate messy arrests of felons and other criminals. Heck, we could even "do an AOC" and get rid of prisons to decrease crime. Felons could vote and there could be automatic voter registration to make ballot harvesting even more advantageous to the Democrats. And screw this voter ID nonsense.

Or stand for a balanced and fair system of government.

So thank you, Joe Manchin--you have the chin of a man and the integrity of a gentleman.

Why not consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against ignorance and evil.

Tweet

Race hustler Al Sharptongue threatens Manchin and Sinema on how they must vote

Race-baiting, White-hating, always agitating Al Sharptongue (Dickweed-MSNBC), who calls himself a reverend and civil rights leader, threatened to use the same tactics against Senators Joe Manchin(D-W.VA) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) that made him rich--he would accuse them of "supporting racism" if they voted to keep the filibuster.

If anyone is a racist in this conversation, it's Sharptongue. He is also a flaming anti-Semite and cannot hide that fact.

Sharptongue has instigated violence and riots in the past, as for example the 1991 Crown Heights riots that led to the death of a religious Jew named Yankel Rosenbaum. Then there was the Freddy's Fashion Mart violence in 1995 where people were shot and the store was set on fire and people died over Sharptongue's outrage over the Jewish storeowner who he called "a Jewish interloper."

There have been other incidents that can easily be researched, but you get the picture.

"The pressure that we are going to put on Sinema and Manchin is calling [the filibuster] racist and saying that they are, in effect, supporting racism," Sharpton told Politico. "Why would they be wedded to something that has those results? Their voters need to know that."

The filibuster is not racist; a process cannot really be racist because a process hasn't the ability to hate. And the Democrats used the filibuster recently to stop Sen. Tim Scott's (R-SC) bill that would reform the police. In fact, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) who says the filibuster is racist, just used the filibuster to stop Scott's bill from passing, thus declaring herself a racist. She also once said that the filibuster is a tool for standing up to bullies.

Fauxcahontas

Sharptongue is merely a part of a larger push from the left to eliminate the filibuster now that Democrats control both houses of Congress. By eliminating the GOP from having any political say, the left can pass Democrats' election and voting rights legislation known as S.1. This would make elections so corrupt and favoring the left, that it would keep them in power indefinitely.

Manchin said earlier in March that he would "never" stop supporting the filibuster. Sinema has said that she is not open to "changing her mind." It's unclear whether Sharptongue plans to do something to stop their votes.

Their views on the filibuster are important because the Senate is evenly split 50-50, with the deciding vote going to the laughing Vice President Harris. In most legislation, there is a 60-vote threshold to advance to President Biden’s desk.

Progressive [aka socialist] Democrats now that they are in power see the filibuster as an outdated relic that can be used by the minority Republican Party under Sen. Mitch McConnell to derail Biden’s socialist agenda and drive the country down the toilet of Lady Liberty. 

At a news conference Wednesday, Senate Republicans said they are prepared to do whatever it takes to block the voting rights bill and predicted Democrats may get rid of the filibuster to usher in the landmark changes. Under this bill, 16-year-olds get to register to vote; write-in votes are fine and ballot harvesting is kosher. 

Sen. Tom Cotton, (R-AR), agreed to stay on the Senate floor for long as it takes if Democrats implemented a new "talking filibuster" where the only way to block legislation would be to stand up and talk until the Second Coming.

"I join all my colleagues in saying there is no amount of time that I will not dedicate on the Senate floor to stopping the Democrats from passing this kind of radical legislation," Cotton said Wednesday, flanked by nearly a dozen Republicans at the Capitol.

Meanwhile, President Biden has lost another two-thousand brain cells and Al Sharptongue is still not in prison.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Vanita Gupa backs $15 "Livable Wage" but not for her family business: she pays $1.30 an hour

It's the old demand to "do what I say, not what I do." That's the Vanita Gupta way of doing things or demanding things be done.

President Biden's nominee for a top DOJ slot has long advocated for a $15 per hour federal minimum wage. For some reason, we should not be surprised to learn that she owns about a million dollars in stock in a company chaired by her father, Raj Gupta, that it pays its Mexican workers as little as $1.30 an hour for their labor.

Gupta's net worth is between $42 and $187 million, making her Sleepy Joe's richest nominee. She owns no less than $500,000 in Aptiv PLC, an international auto parts maker. According to active jobs listings reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon, the company pays a portion of its workers a disgraceful $1.30 an hour.

One job posted on Indeed.com, for example, offers a line operator role at one of their plants in Zacatecas that pays the U.S. dollar equivalent of $260 A MONTH! for a 50-hour per week job. 

If the plant was located in Manhattan, NY, that would just about cover the carfare getting to work. Hardly a livable wage. But on social media and in her nonprofit work, Gupta has incessantly expressed support for the $15 minimum wage and a "livable wage."

Now that Gupta's confirmation process is underway, she is facing greater scrutiny and things are bubbling up to the surface like unexpected bubbles in the bathwater.

Hopefully Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WVA) will reconsider his support for this hypocrite, but don't count on it.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Schiffless cites CBS "head on pike" BS angering GOP

The Senate Republicans, even the potential swing-voters, are infuriated after Adam Schiff, House Impeachment Manager, (D-CA) made reference to a report by Complete Bull S*** News (CBS) that GOP members were threatened with dire consequences if they voted to convict President Trump. The only fact in this claim is that CBS made the fake news report.

"CBS News reported last night that a Trump confidant said that key senators were warned, ‘Vote against the president and your head will be on a pike.’ I don’t know if that’s true," Schiff lied, while trying to manipulate Senate Republicans to vote with "moral courage" rather than in their political self-interest [or lack of any evidence].

Several senators went on record objecting to Schiff's BS.

"I thought he was doing fine with [talking about] moral courage until he got to the 'head on a pike.' That's where he lost me,” Sen. Lisa Murkowski, (R-AK) said. She previously stated that she would be open to calling witnesses in the trial. "He's a good orator. ...It was just unnecessary," she added.

After the bug-eyed liar made his remark, several Republican Senators reportedly shook their heads and said, "That's not true," after Schiff made his repugnant remark.

“I hope it’s not true,” Schiff lied. He hates Trump and has repeatedly lied about nonexistent "facts," and non-existent "evidence."

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), considered another key Republican vote, agreed with Murkowski. ["I would like to kick Schiff right in his solar nuts," she was probably thinking.]

“Not only have I never heard the ‘head on the pike’ line but also I know of no Republican senator who has been threatened in any way by anyone in the administration," she told reporters.

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA), called the story "baloney." She said she was listening to Schiffhead, "until he got to the part where he just completely made a bunch of bullcrap up," [aka BS].

Sen. John Barrasso [R-WY], said, "No Republican senator has been told that. What he has proven to all of us is, he is capable of falsehoods [aka BS] and will tell it to the country. And would tell it to us when we are sitting in the Senate chamber. When every one of us knows it is not true."

Sen. James Lankford (R-OK), who has a great announcer's voice, also said he would be open to witnesses and old reporters it’s “completely, totally false.”

“None of us have been told that,” he said. “That’s insulting and demeaning to everyone to say that we somehow live in fear and that the president has threatened all of us.″

Even some Democrats were miffed by the remark.

Sen. Joe Manchin, (D-W.VA.), hasn’t revealed how he plans to vote. Regarding Schiff's BS, Manchin said, "That could have been left out, that's for sure."

Other Democrats scoffed, suggesting the outrage was a made-up excuse to oppose calling witnesses. This too is BS--the Republicans would be happy to call witnesses that make the President's case, such as the main witness, Hunter Biden.

Minority Leader Chuck "Nostrils" Schumer (D-NY), told Communist outlet MSNBC, "The Republicans are so afraid to confront the actual facts here ... they're always looking for a diversion."

The actual facts, as Schumer says, are in the transcript of the phone call, the fact that the left, since the day Trump got elected, planned to impeach him, and the fact that Adam Schiff vetoed every witness the Republican House wanted to testify.

Trump’s defense team will begin their opening statements in the trial Saturday morning after the 28,000 pages of House BS is delivered.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings.

Tweet

Senate Dems frustrated over Alexandria Occasionally Coherent Cortex

AOC after someone said, "Look, a dead bird"

She can dance, she can cook and she can tweet. But she isn't very good at math and many of the friends she hangs out with are terrorists fans and anti-Semites, [but I repeat myself].

Rep. Alexandria Occasionally Coherent-Cortex (D-soc-NY) still needs to ask directions to find her office, but she, like a teenager, knows everything and Democratic senators are frustrated with her lack of basic knowledge about most things. They say her views aren't in line with those of their constituents. Actually her views are more in line with Joe Stalin.

Since becoming famous [mostly for her dancing and lack of math skills] Cortex has accused Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, of "death," attacked the media and fact checkers for checking her "facts."

She also proposed a 70 percent socialist-style tax rate for the evil wealthy because she just does not like them and believes it would somehow pay for free healthcare, free college, free Skittles, whatever.

Centrist Democrats are worried about the party adopting these and other untenable positions for their platform, saying it will hurt their chances for reelection in upcoming races, the Hill reports. But it should be popular with their unemployed, lack of motivation and dead-spirited base.

Her Green New Deal is a clear example of how she wants to implement socialism into the fabric of our economy. She actually thinks that taking away the budget for the military [before Russia, Iran and China decide to walk all over us] will pay the $40 TRILLION for her socialist programs. All the money spent on the military, since the country was formed, would not come close to that figure and she doesn't have a real clue about how to pay for the spending she wants.

Democrats have to pick up at least three seats in 2020 to gain control of the Senate. In order to do so they will need to focus on winning in centrist or Republican-leaning states like Alabama, Colorado, New Hampshire, Iowa and North Carolina by pretending to be conservatives.

Some of the bipartisan issues Democrats would prefer to focus on in those states include helping veterans, lowering health care costs, and focusing on the federal deficit, but Cortex is driving the party to focus on other issues, according to some lawmakers and wants to defund the military.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D., NH), who faces a competitive reelection in 2020, said Cortex's "views don’t represent a lot of my constituents." It turns out that a lot of her constituents are not communists and have jobs.

Sen. Doug Jones (D-Ala.), one of the most vulnerable incumbents up for reelection in 2020, said he's not happy the idiot is becoming a sort of spokesperson for the party, saying, "I think it skews what’s really there for the Democratic Party."

In the House, Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL) said last summer that "Meteors fizz out. What she will learn in this institution is that it’s glacial to begin with, and therefore no matter how far you rise, that’s just how far you will ultimately get your comeuppance."

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), who won reelection in a state President Donald Trump won by 42 points, echoed Jones' sentiment, saying that while liberals in the party might be getting widespread media attention now, it will be the centrist Democrats who get bills passed into law. In other words, the swamp-dwellers.

Cortex hasn't been shy about criticizing Trump, but centrist Democrats have warned the approach isn't a recipe for victory in 2020. On the other hand, it seems that even centrist Democrats have little to show for a plan other than criticizing the entire GOP with their claims of sexism, bigotry, homophobia, xenophobia, Islamophobia, phobiaphobia bull droppings.

Former Sens. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) and Joe Donnelly (D-IN), who both lost during the 2018 midterms, expressed concern "Trump bashing" will hurt Democrats' chances of taking back the Senate and defeating Trump in 2020. This, they believe, may have something to do with the notion that the nation elected him president of the United States.

"I worry that the Democrats are majoring in Trump bashing," she began, unaware that Democrats often majored in lesbian dance theory. "And we’ll have to do more than that in order to win the confidence of enough Americans to regain the Senate and importantly the presidency," McCaskill said.

Will 2019 be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint? Let's hope so, because politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.




Tweet

BREAKING: Collins and Manchin have decided on Kavanaugh vote: aye

Photo: Screen grab

Senators Susan Collins R-Maine, and Joe Manchin, D-W.Va. have made their decision to vote in favor of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. These are the two critical votes for the confirmation.

Collins spoke for close to an hour in a lawyer-like speech about the hearing and almost immediately after she declared her support for the Kavanaugh confirmation, Manchin told the media that he will also vote to confirm. Protesters went full chant and liberal tears flowed like the River Jordan.

Manchin said that while he had some "reservations" due to the uncorroborated allegations against Kavanaugh and his temperament, he said, "I believe he will rule in a manner that is consistent with our Constitution."

Collins attacked the confirmation process saying it resembled a "caricature of a gutter-level political campaign" and she slammed Democrats for announcing their opposition to Kavanaugh even before his name was announced, in what is an apparent attack on President Trump's presidency.

Collins also criticized outside groups for distorting Kavanaugh's record and their "over-the-top rhetoric."

Yah think?

The actual confirmation vote should take place tomorrow afternoon.


Click the "Follow Posts" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.


Tweet

Crunch time for Kavanaugh

The testimony from Christine Blasey Ford had some credibility but her inability to keep parts of her testimony straight leaves questions. She feared flying and couldn't testify on Monday, but she flew to Washington, D.C. anyway, and flies every year to see her family.

Her claim that she didn't know how to go about contacting her local congressional representative also makes one question her actual intelligence, while her inability to remember certain details, like who paid for the polygraph, when and where did this all take place, and who was in the room--just Judge and Kavanaugh or was it our people, makes one wonder her veracity.

The heartfelt opening by Judge Kavanaugh was very moving.

But the fact of this entire political embarrassment is the idea that while Ford's testimony may have been credible to many, especially those on the left, there was not a shred of corroboration to her claims by people she cited were there, and even her close longtime friend said she didn't know Brett Kavanaugh or remember the party where he was alleged to have raped her.

After the hearing, Senators Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Joe Manchin (D-W. Va.), and Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) got together to discuss the nomination.

Jeff Flake isn't running for another term so his vote is anyone's guess. Joe Manchin is a Democrat in a heavily red district. Lisa Murkowski is a moderate and may have allegiances to her gender over the lack of evidence or corroboration. And Susan Collins just talks funny--kind of like a lady in a flower store.

The group huddled together for about a half hour before a GOP conference meeting Thursday evening ahead of Friday's Judiciary Committee vote on whether to move forward on Kavanaugh's confirmation to the full Senate.

After Lindsey Graham (R-S.C) gave a powerful speech admonishing the tactics the Democrats used to get the committee to this point, while destroying the reputation of Kavanaugh, and even hurting Ford, his accuser, it seems that any Republican voting against the nominee will be kissing their political career adieu.

The feeling seems to be that if Kavanaugh is somehow not confirmed, the GOP will be destroyed in the November mid-term elections.

It's possible that Ford is telling the truth. It's possible she is mistaken that it was Kavanaugh who was sexually inappropriate. It's even possible she's lying, but it seems as if she believes her story, which would explain why she passed the polygraph test.

But we cannot ruin a person's life and career based on allegations, because if we do, nobody in their right mind would agree to go through this horrible process.

The Senate embarrassed itself today.


Click the "Follow Posts" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page.


Tweet

Crazy Mazie and Depressing Dianne got their campaign cash from fellow wife-beating Dem

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) wants men to "just shut up and step up" over the allegations of sexual misconduct against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

Crazy Mazie is taking her own advice and keeping her mouth shut after it was shown that she has taken money from an admitted wife abuser, a fellow Democrat, Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.).

Carper's First State PAC donate $1,000 to Hirono's campaign in June, after he publicly admitted to spousal abuse.

But wait!

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) already received $5,000 from Carper's PAC and other Democrats [aka hypocrites; aka Hypocrats] are raking in the dough from the dude who throws the blows: Senators John Tester of Montana, Bill Nelson of Florida and Joe Manchin of West Virginia. Each of them have received $10,000 from the PAC so far this year.

Carper admitted to hitting his wife, although he first denied it when it was first reported during his 1982 run for Congress, [ironically the same year Christine Blasey Ford alleged she was sexually abused by Kavanaugh], when he was interviewed in 1998 by a local journalist, Celia Cohen, who wrote "Only in Delaware."

"Did I slap my wife 20 years ago? Yes," Carper boasted. "Do I regret it? Yes. Would I do it again? No."

Are you a schmuck? Yes. Do you like asking your own questions? Duh.

Cohen wrote that Carper "would not speak of the physical abuse, even when they were repackaged and resurfaced 14 years later when they  he ran was running for a second term as governor," but in the book interview, "he dealt with them straightforwardly."

The New York Post first alleged Carper hit his wife "so hard he gave her a black eye" while his children were allegedly "slapped around and bruised by Carper for behaviors such things as leaving the family dog on the bed."

But that doesn't matter to his fellow Democrats. He won his party's primary this month for a fourth Senate term.

Congratulations, Democrats. Your hypocrisy is only exceeded by lack of morals.

So while the Democrats are trying to make a case about a 17-year-old boy who they claim tried to rape a 15-year-old girl (who allegedly once bragged about having sex with over 60 high school boys) they have real issues with alliances with men who abuse women.

Mazie Hirono is the loudest anti-Kavanaugh senator, criticizing men and the culture of silence that the MeToo is attacking.

"Guess who is perpetuating all of these kinds of actions? It's the men in this country," Hirono said on Tuesday. "I just want to say to the men in this country: Just shut up and step up. Do the right thing, for a change."

Oh, and thank you Senator Carper for the kind donation.

"This is an environment where people see nothing, hear nothing, and say nothing. That is what we have to change," Hirono said in a statement, forgetting to add: 'except for Democrats.'


Click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page.



Tweet

Manchin hits Pelosi and Paul Ryan for Pelosi's 'Make America white again' comment

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WVa.) is a moderate Democrat and criticized House Minority Leader Nancy "Dancing Hands" Pelosi when she called President Trump's immigration plan a blue print to "make America white again."

But Joe did it artfully.

Manchin was able to obfuscate the statement by saying on CNN's 'State of the Union' that we "don't need that type of rhetoric on either side, from Nancy, (Speaker) Paul Ryan or anybody else."

Paul Ryan did not make such a statement, nor did anybody else in the Republican Party. But by throwing in Ryan's name and 'anybody else,' it sounds as if both parties are guilty of identity politics, when, in fact, that's the bread and butter of the left.

Manchin leads a bipartisan Senate group that is trying to solve the immigration problem.

But the problem is, Republicans see it as a legal and a national security problem, while the Democrats see it as a voting block problem they need to get their hands on.

Senate Minority Leader Charles "Nostrils" Schumer of New York, called Trump's plan a wish list" for hard-liners. He acknowledged the areas of common agreement on both sides for illegal immigrants shielded by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA). 

But Schumer flared his mighty nostrils and accused Trump of using DACA recipients as "a tool to tear apart our legal immigration system and adopt the wish list that anti-immigration hardliners have advocated for years."

Naturally, Schumer is full of it. Most conservatives have no issue with legal immigration. We tend to follow the law and want others coming here to do the same. And let's face it, if most immigrants were to vote Republican, the Democrats would be taking the same stance on illegal immigration that conservatives take.

If the left really cared about DACA recipients, they would have immediately passed Trump's plan to allow 1.8 million DACA recipients to stay here, almost three times as many as Obama did, but the Democrats need it as an issue for the midterms.


Tweet