The Border Security deal sucks as bad as we thought

"Albindebobdah shrump, man. I'm serious."

The Senate's so called "border security" deal was released on Sunday evening and although both Sens. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) and James Lankford (R-OK) said the prior leaks were incorrect, it turns out the bill sucked as badly as originally believed it would.

First of all, the real reason for the bill had little if nothing to do with the actual crisis at the southern border. It was about Ukraine funding for the most part, with an additional $60 billion sent to them. 

Insofar as the Southern Border is concerned, the bill says the "border emergency authority" only goes into effect after 5,000 illegal aliens are "encountered" at the border--just like we knew all along and the RINO Senator from Oklahoma denied.

So do the math: 1,800,000 illegal aliens per year will arrive here before anything is done to stop the hemorrhaging of potential criminals and terrorists. And trust me, there will be some of those characters because we've seen them already.

Both Sinema and Lankford swore that item wasn’t in the bill. Both need to be voted out of office, or better still, impeached, if that's a legal option. They clearly, unquestionably lied to us.

Before the 5,000 illegal immigrant threshold is met, the bill says that single adults would be detained and the catch-and-release policy for families would remain in place. Now that's going to be hard for the cartels to get around, isn't it? I can't imagine how they could possibly beat the system. There will be hardly any DNA testing funding in the bill to confirm veracity of family claims.

In addition, unaccompanied minor children [aka future Democrats] would be handed over to the Office of Refugee Resettlement [or possibly MS13].

There's a lot more to be upset over in the bill, but you can read it yourself here.

I am sick of our political leaders routinely lying to us. We must vote them out of office and replace them with honorable men and women.

Tweet

AZ Senator getting GOPers and Dem senators to head to border

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) is doing what Biden refuses to do: go to the southern border. But Sinema, who left the Democratic Party because she realizes that the country has a real crisis on our hands and her former colleagues are making it worse, is hoping to head there with both Republicans and Democrats to witness the failed immigration system under this brain-addled administration.

This has been her biggest political move since leaving the Democratic Party to become an Independent and the trip is planned for next month.

“Part of the problem is that many in Washington have never taken the time to really see our border up close,” Sinema said Tuesday, according to The Hill. “Without seeing it for all of its diversity and its challenges, it can be easy to rely on the partisan talking points instead of focusing on the meaningful, realistic solutions.”

Sinema is working with Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) in order to get senators on board “who are willing and committed to get something done” on immigration. 

“We’re gonna see what Arizonans see every day because a crisis this big should not and cannot be ignored,” Sinema added.

The problem is, however, the Democratic Party supports open borders because it's more important they have power than fairness. Open borders is unfair to those immigrants who stood in line to wait for their status approval and those who did, are not happy with the cheaters.

The Border Patrol has been inundated with illegal aliens crossing into the country since our alleged President was told he is the President and that the person he thought was his wife, was actually his sister and vice-versa. The estimated number of illegals who enter the country each day is around 8,000. That's crazy.

Perhaps Kyrsten Sinema has something going that both sides need observe--it's called bi-partisanship. 

Tweet

GOP block Dems' election bills, setting up a 'what the Chuck' showdown over nuclear option

The not insane Senate Republicans Wednesday used the filibuster to block the insane and self-serving Democrat election legislation, denying it the 60 votes it required to advance and set up a potential "nuclear option" set up by Sen. Chuck "I Once Supported the Filibuster When We Needed It" Schumer. 

Majority Leader Schumer planned to use a party-line vote to lower the filibuster threshold for some legislation to a simple majority with the hope of some day taking complete control over the country and never giving it up.

Every Republican voted against a procedural vote on the legislation, even RINOs like Adam Kisinger and Liz Chaney, and all Democrats voted for it ending with a 49 - 51 vote after Chucky changed his vote to the Democrat side in order to preserve his right to bring the vote up in the future.

Now the Senator from New York is probably going to initiate a "nuclear option" to rid the 60-vote threshold completely, so that Democrats can ruin the country in its entirety.

"We will all confront a critical question: Shall members of this chamber do what is necessary to pass these bills?" Schumer, along with his giant nostrils, said on the Senate floor Wednesday. "It is my hope that courage awakens within the heart of our Republican colleagues before the day is out. But if the Senate cannot protect the right to vote… under the existing rules, then the Senate rules must be reformed."

Courage? The Democrats don't have the courage to follow the concept of a republican form of government and would like to rule using the tyranny of the majority.

Schumer, who had once advocated for the filibuster when it suited his purpose added: "For those who feel that the filibuster is a good thing and helps bring us together, I would ask this question: Isn't the protection of voting rights, the must fundamental wellspring of this democracy, more important?"

This has nothing to do with the protection of voting rights. Black people and other minorities are just as capable of getting a personal ID and finding a polling place as White people. The election of Barack Obama certainly proves that notion.

Sens. Joe Manchin, (D-WV), and Kyrsten Sinema, (D-AZ), oppose altering the filibuster through a party-line vote, and that somehow gave them the title of "racist" by their Democrat colleagues. See, the word "racist" now means doing anything the left doesn't like or voting the "wrong way."

Schumer, who will be doing his own "Joe Biden Skivvy Assault" if he gets a primary challenge by Rep. Alexandria Obviously-Commie, is expected to go ahead with the gambit anyway after promising this week to get all senators "on the record" on the issue.

To initiate the nuclear option, Schumer can call a "point of order." He would then ask Vice President Kamala Hahaharris, who presides over the Senate, whether the threshold to advance legislation is 60 votes or 51. Harris would then respond that the threshold is 60, and then Schumer can appeal her ruling. 

The Senate would then enter into a vote of whether to "affirm" the chair's ruling – that the Senate filibuster threshold is 60. That means most Democrats will vote "no" while and all Republicans are expected to vote "yes."

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Most likely, the chair's ruling will be affirmed and the Republicans and handful of Democrats who vote in the negative will win the vote, preserving the filibuster.

But with the way things are in the nation, you never know how this will turn out.

Tweet

Race hustler Al Sharptongue threatens Manchin and Sinema on how they must vote

Race-baiting, White-hating, always agitating Al Sharptongue (Dickweed-MSNBC), who calls himself a reverend and civil rights leader, threatened to use the same tactics against Senators Joe Manchin(D-W.VA) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) that made him rich--he would accuse them of "supporting racism" if they voted to keep the filibuster.

If anyone is a racist in this conversation, it's Sharptongue. He is also a flaming anti-Semite and cannot hide that fact.

Sharptongue has instigated violence and riots in the past, as for example the 1991 Crown Heights riots that led to the death of a religious Jew named Yankel Rosenbaum. Then there was the Freddy's Fashion Mart violence in 1995 where people were shot and the store was set on fire and people died over Sharptongue's outrage over the Jewish storeowner who he called "a Jewish interloper."

There have been other incidents that can easily be researched, but you get the picture.

"The pressure that we are going to put on Sinema and Manchin is calling [the filibuster] racist and saying that they are, in effect, supporting racism," Sharpton told Politico. "Why would they be wedded to something that has those results? Their voters need to know that."

The filibuster is not racist; a process cannot really be racist because a process hasn't the ability to hate. And the Democrats used the filibuster recently to stop Sen. Tim Scott's (R-SC) bill that would reform the police. In fact, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) who says the filibuster is racist, just used the filibuster to stop Scott's bill from passing, thus declaring herself a racist. She also once said that the filibuster is a tool for standing up to bullies.

Fauxcahontas

Sharptongue is merely a part of a larger push from the left to eliminate the filibuster now that Democrats control both houses of Congress. By eliminating the GOP from having any political say, the left can pass Democrats' election and voting rights legislation known as S.1. This would make elections so corrupt and favoring the left, that it would keep them in power indefinitely.

Manchin said earlier in March that he would "never" stop supporting the filibuster. Sinema has said that she is not open to "changing her mind." It's unclear whether Sharptongue plans to do something to stop their votes.

Their views on the filibuster are important because the Senate is evenly split 50-50, with the deciding vote going to the laughing Vice President Harris. In most legislation, there is a 60-vote threshold to advance to President Biden’s desk.

Progressive [aka socialist] Democrats now that they are in power see the filibuster as an outdated relic that can be used by the minority Republican Party under Sen. Mitch McConnell to derail Biden’s socialist agenda and drive the country down the toilet of Lady Liberty. 

At a news conference Wednesday, Senate Republicans said they are prepared to do whatever it takes to block the voting rights bill and predicted Democrats may get rid of the filibuster to usher in the landmark changes. Under this bill, 16-year-olds get to register to vote; write-in votes are fine and ballot harvesting is kosher. 

Sen. Tom Cotton, (R-AR), agreed to stay on the Senate floor for long as it takes if Democrats implemented a new "talking filibuster" where the only way to block legislation would be to stand up and talk until the Second Coming.

"I join all my colleagues in saying there is no amount of time that I will not dedicate on the Senate floor to stopping the Democrats from passing this kind of radical legislation," Cotton said Wednesday, flanked by nearly a dozen Republicans at the Capitol.

Meanwhile, President Biden has lost another two-thousand brain cells and Al Sharptongue is still not in prison.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Martha McSally appointed to fill McCain's Senate seat

Rep. Martha McSally (R-AZ) has been appointed to fill the late John McCain's Senate seat following Sen. Jon Kyl's (R-AZ) stepping down at year's end. Kyl was originally assigned by Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey to fill McCain's seat.

Gov. Ducey made the announcement on Tuesday about McSally's appointment. She had lost to Democrat Kyrsten Sinema in November for the other Senate in a close election. Sinema, a staunch leftist, has made a number of disparaging remarks about Arizonans and the state, so her winning over McSally proves to a degree that some people are too stupid to care or too uninformed to know that the person you voted for basically called you a 'meth-head.'

“All her life, Martha has put service first — leading in the toughest of fights and at the toughest of times,” Ducey said in a statement. “With her experience and long record of service, Martha is uniquely qualified to step up and fight for Arizona’s interests in the U.S. Senate. I thank her for taking on this significant responsibility and look forward to working with her and Senator-Elect Sinema to get positive things done.”

McSally, who distinguished herself early in her career as the first female fighter pilot to serve in combat, said she was “humbled and grateful” for the opportunity to serve.

Sinema distinguished herself early in her career as a member of Code Pink and said that she didn't care if someone joins the Taliban to shoot U.S. troops (a comment McSally called "treason"). She also defended anarchists destroying property, characterized U.S. soldiers as evil demons, and called Arizona "a meth lab of democracy."

For more crazy things Sinema has said, click here.

It will be interesting to see how the two new Arizona senators get along.

“I am humbled and grateful to have this opportunity to serve and be a voice for all Arizonans,” McSally’s statement said. “I look forward to working with Senator-Elect Kyrsten Sinema and getting to work from day one.”

After McCain’s passed away in August, Kyl returned to the upper chamber at Ducey’s request after retiring his Senate seat in 2013. Kyl announced last week that he would serve through the end of the current legislative session and vacate his seat effective December 31.

Cindy McCain expressed hope that McSally would continue her husband’s legacy of service above self interest in a Tuesday tweet and Joy Behar is a schmuck. Just saying.

“My husband’s greatest legacy was placing service to AZ & USA ahead of his own self-interest,” she tweeted. “I respect @dougducey’s decision to appoint @RepMcSally to fill the remainder of his term. Arizonans will be pulling for her, hoping that she will follow his example of selfless leadership.”

McSally’s seat will once again be on the ballot in 2020 and it is hoped by everyone with a brain that she wins the 2020 election.

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do. 

I hope you have a wonderful Christmas.

Tweet

Iran goes bug-bang ballistic over sanctions: Rouhani grabs his crotch and talks all bellicose and stuff

The Trump administration snapped back sanctions on Iran and they liked it about as much as a beaver with dentures.

The Islamic Republic of Iran went ballistic on Monday and began the day with air defense drills and an acknowledgement from President Hassan Rouhani that the country now faces a "war situation." This has obviously increased tensions as our tough approach to the s***hole country takes hold.

The sanctions now have ended all the economic benefits the US has granted the nation that chants "Death to America!" "Death to Israel!" with their morning tea that we granted them since the 2015 crappy nuclear deal.

Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam and buddies with Obama and Keith Ellison, to name a few, led the same "Death to America" chant in Iran, and even with his multitude of anti Semitic rhetoric, has still not been banned from Twitter or Facebook.

Ostensibly, Iran continues to abide by the accord that limits its enrichment of uranium, but hey, you never know. Iran's officials threaten they could resume enrichment at the drop of a turban.

The sanctions we've imposed really hurt Iran's vital oil industry, a source where much of their feeble economy depends. Their money has plummeted over the last year, and prices have skyrocketed as a result.

"Today, Iran is able to sell its oil and it will sell," Rouhani bragged Monday as the sanctions began.

The military drill was televised on state TV. It was to continue through Tuesday as Americans go to the polls. Iranian army Gen. Habibillah Sayyari [his Jewish friends call him "Hi Bubbalah"] said the country's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, the same crap-weasels who kidnapped our sailors a few years ago in the Straits of Hormuz, were taking part in the exercise. And while many of them needed a shower before the exercises began, all will surely need one afterward.

Rouhani pledged to government officials on state TV that Iran would overcome the sanctions, and Kyrsten Sinema, along with some of her anti-Trump friends, sang "We Shall Overcome" for the Iranian cause, but added, "Let's not forget about the Taliban! Let's give them a big hand!"

Iran's national currency, the rial, currently trades at 145,000 to a U.S. buck, down from 40,500 to the US dollar from last year. The chaos it caused resulted in mass anti-government protests leading to 5,000 arrests and only 25 people killed, as some demonstrations continue to this day.

The Trump administration say the sanctions are aimed at persuading the government of Iran to radically change its bellicose policies, including support for regional militant groups and its development of long-range ballistic missiles that they would love to use on the US and Israel.

On the other hand, both National Security Advisor John Bolton and Rudy Giuliani, President Trump's personal lawyer, made public statements supporting the overthrow of Iran's theocratic, dictatorial government.


Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

Arizona troopers' union pull support from Dems opposing McSally in Senate race

Arizona -- A union representing state public safety employees withdrew its endorsement of U.S. Rep. Kyrsten Sinema this week. Members say the executive board voted on the endorsement without asking the members for their input.

Sinema, a bi-sexual, far-left, divorced, former social worker, Arizona-hating, Democrat [but I repeat myself] is in a close senate seat race against U.S. Rep. Martha McSally, a retired USAF colonel, one of the highest-ranking female pilots in Air Force history, who flew the Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II, and was the first female commander of a USAF fighter squadron. They are vying for a seat being vacated by Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ).

McSally also successfully sued the DoD in McSally v. Rumsfeld, challenging the military policy mandating servicewomen stationed in Saudi Arabia wear an abaya, a cloth coffin pretending to be clothing, when traveling off base in the country.

But I digress.

After union members objected to the board's unilateral actions, the Arizona State Troopers Association polled its members via email Monday asking whether they wanted to endorse the far-left Sinema [who once described Arizona as the "meth lab of democracy" and called Arizona men "Neanderthals"], or stay neutral.

The poll indicated "the membership has indicated a preference to stay neutral."

It's possible the male troopers were influenced by their wives who may have taken issue with other statements Sinema made in the past.

Specifically, in 2006 Sinema described what she thought of women who stay at home to care for their children: "These women who act like staying at home, leeching off their husbands or boyfriends, and just cashing the checks is some sort of feminism because they're choosing to live that life. That's bulls**t. I mean, what the f**k are we really talking about here?"

So a woman's right to choose is only okay if the choice a woman makes agrees with Sinema's.

Hypocrisy. Sad!


Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

Arizona GOP Senate candidate Martha McSally blasts Kyrsten Sinema

Arizona Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate Martha McSally told "Fox News" in an exclusive, that her rival Democrat [comrade] Kyrsten Sinema is "disqualified" to be a U.S. senator due to her 2003 comments on a Phoenix radio program that was supportive of the Taliban, a known terrorist organization. McSally also pointed out that Sinema wore a "pink tutu" as a war protester.

On the radio program, the host gave Sinema a hypothetical: "As an individual, if I want to go fight in the Taliban army, I go over there and I'm fighting for the Taliban--I'm saying that's a personal decision," Sinema replied: "Fine. I don't care if you want to do that . . . go ahead."

Except that's treason and in a charged moment at a Monday debate, McSally said Sinema's comments amounted to "treason." She demanded an apology from the treasonous candidate.

"Martha has chosen to run a campaign like the one you're seeing right now where she's engaging in ridiculous attacks and smearing my campaign," Sinema responded, lying through he teeth, adding that McSally was not showing "the full picture."

McSally spoke to host Chris Wallace on Sunday [Sinema refuses to go on that show] and slammed the traitor for failing to apologize for her remarks. "It's her words, it's totally out of step with American values, when she clearly says in this radio interview, she has no problem with an American going to join the Taliban."

McSally served in the USAF from 1988 to 2010. She flew the A-10 Thunderbolt II and she became the first female commander of an Air Force fighter squadron. he said that Sinema's words were "personal." I concur.

"This is personal for those of us who served and actually fought against the Taliban," McSally said. "I was a squadron commander over there, with my A-10 squadron. We were getting shot at by the Taliban: the Taliban was killing Americans. The worst days we had a Bagram Air Force base when I was a commander was when an American gave their last breath fighting for our freedoms . . .  and was killed by someone from the Taliban.

"We would stop everything we were doing; we would line up along the ramp, as their flag-draped casket came by, and we would each then salute in silence--you could hear a pin drop--as we said goodbye to this American hero who was killed by the Taliban."

"This is personal for those of us who served and actually fought against the Taliban," McSally said.

Sinema once called Arizona the "meth lab of democracy," and in a 2011 speech, she characterized Arizonans as "crazy." She will prove her point by those who vote for her in the midterms.

She also characterized stay-at-home mothers as "leeches."

No wonder the left loves Sinema. She is anti-American  all the way.


Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.

Tweet

Kyrsten Sinema rejects family values; claims stay-at-home moms 'leech off their husbands'

Arizona socialist and Democratic senatorial candidate Kyrsten Sinema once agreed that it was just fine for Americans to join the Taliban. She accused of President George W. Bush of "Crowning himself King of the World for Life," and of putting arsenic in the nation's drinking water, and referred to Arizona citizens as "racists."

Now she has made it clear of her contempt for stay-at-home mothers.

In a 2006 interview with Scottsdale nightlife magazine 944, the socialist went berserk when describing women who stay at home to care for their children and run a household. "These women who act like staying at home, leeching off their husbands or boyfriends, and just cashing the checks is some sort of feminism because they're choosing to live that life. That's bullsh*t. I mean, what the f**k are we really talking about here?"

Well, for one thing, we're talking about what was once traditional in a standard household--the mother stayed home, took care of raising the kids to a degree, cooked and cleaned while the father was out earning a living.

Good fathers would help their wives with doing things around the house, but there were gender roles and nobody had a problem with that until the second wave of feminists came around to tell women how to think.

Sinema was once married to a BYU classmate but later divorced him. [Lucky guy.] Fortunately, she has no children and is a strong advocate for killing babies in the womb if they pose an inconvenience. She co-sponsored the Women's Health Protection Act, which has almost nothing to do with women's health, but almost everything to do with allowing mothers to kill their baby while it was still growing in the womb.

Carol Tobias, president of the National Right to Life Committee told the Senate Judiciary Committee:

We find the formal title or marketing label, "Women's Health Protection Act," to be highly misleading. The bill is really about just one thing: stripping away from elected lawmakers the ability to provide even the most minimal protections for unborn children, at any stage of their development. The proposal is so sweeping and extreme that it would be difficult to capture its full scope in any short title. Calling it the "Abortion Without Limits Until Birth Act" would be more in line with truth-in-advertising standards.

The bill would subject any law or government policy that affects the practice of abortion, even indirectly, to an array of sweeping legal tests, designed to guarantee that almost none will survive. The general rule would be that any law that specifically regulated abortion would be presumptively invalid. The same would be true of any law that is not abortion-specific but has the effect or claimed effect of reducing access to abortion. It is apparent that those who crafted this bill believe that, where abortion is involved, immediate access to abortion, or any stage of pregnancy, is the only thing that matters.

In her 2009 obscure book, "Unite and Conquer: How to Build Coalitions That Win--And Last,"  Sinema wrote: "I don't mean that we should all of a sudden abandon our principles and adopt moral relativism. I just mean that we should consider the idea that perhaps people with views different from our own come about those ideas honestly and that those ideas aren't inherently evil."

As long as those ideas are the same as hers and aren't about mothers raising their children in the centuries old way.


Please click the "Follow" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.

Tweet

Kyrsten Sinema is not on America's side

Kyrsten Sinema, the Democratic Senate candidate, who represents Arizona's 9th District in the House, is as honest as the scorpion talking to a frog.

Last week it was discovered that in 2003, Sinema had promoted campus appearances of Lynne Stewart, the radical lawyer who was being prosecuted for providing material support to terrorism. When Sinema was called out on it, she lied by distorting the facts of the case.

Stewart, who died in 2017, represented the terrorist, Omar Abdel Rahman [aka: the "Blind Sheikh"], who also died in 2017, just weeks before Stewart. Rahman was the jihadi whom Stewart was convicted of abetting; helping him communicate with his Egyptian terrorist mob from the U.S. prison where he was serving a life sentence for his role in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.

In a scorching article in the National Review, Andrew McCarthy, the prosecutor who put Rahman behind bars, counters Sinema's "misrepresentations about her advocacy on Stewart's behalf."

McCarthy refers to Steward as a "jihadist-friendly lawyer," and says that although Sinema portrays herself as a moderate progressive, she is anything but. In 2003, in what Fox News describes as a "now-closed Yahoo group," known as Local to Global Justice, she encouraged people to attend two events in which Stewart was the featured speaker.

This came at a time when Stewart was under federal indictment for providing material support to terrorism and Sinema knew it.

Stewart had two co-defendants, Ahmed Abdel Sattar and Mohammed Yousry, both longtime aides to Abdel Rahman with whom she was accused of facilitating the Blind Sheikh's communication with the Islamic terrorist group,  Gama'at al Islamia, an Egyptian terrorist organization that the Blind Sheikh helped found in the early 1980s, when it participated in the assassination of President Anwar al-Sadat.

When Stewart and her co-scum committed the crimes alleged in the indictment, Abdel Rahman had been convicted in the WTC bombing and subsequent [unsuccessful] plot to bomb New York City landmarks and other terrorist plots.

Gama'at, in an attempt to obtain Abdel Rahman's release, threatened to "target . . . all of those Americans who participated in subjecting [Abdel Rahman's] life to danger" --"every American official, starting with the American president [down] to the despicable jailer."

Perhaps even the prison janitor.

A match made in Jahannam

And six months later, this group of jihadis attacked 58 foreign tourists and several police officers at an archeological site in Luxor, Egypt. They brutally shot them and then sliced them to death. Gama'at left behind leaflets--including the mutilated torso of one of its victims--demanding the Blind Sheikh be released.

The group later issued a statement warning that the forcible struggle against the Egyptian regime would continue unless Mubarak met its 3 demands: implementing sharia [law], the ceasing of diplomatic relations with Israel, and "the return of our Sheikh and emir to his land."

And the killings continued but to no avail.

These are the killers, the jihadis that Stewart helped the Blind Sheikh to consult with and direct by unlawfully transmitting messages, in direct contravention of enhanced confinement measures the DoJ's Bureau of Prisons (BOP) put in place to prevent such communications between the convicted blind scumcrumpet and his minions.

After Stewart's indictment in 2002, she was praised by many radical left-wing morons that opposed a forcible response to the 911 attacks. Sinema's Local to Global Justice was among these groups.

Aside from Sinema's defense of those who want to fight for the Taliban, she also maintained that Stewart was "emphatically not guilty." She said that Stewart was charged only because of surveillance powers enabled by the "hastily enacted PATRIOT Act." She insisted that Stewart was merely "doing her job for the past 27 years as an outspoken criminal defense lawyer."

If Sinema somehow beats Martha McSally, an American combat veteran, in the midterm elections, that would be a tragedy and an indication that the country is going to hell in a hand basket.


Click the "Follow Posts" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.




Tweet