The Widow Who Refused the Official Silence

Twenty-five years on, the commemorations of September 11 have a settled rhythm. Names are read. Bells are struck. Officials look grave. 

Then a widow stepped forward at Ground Zero and declined to play her assigned part.

Terry Strada's husband, Tom, was murdered in the North Tower of the World Trade Center. He had been at work on the 104th floor when American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building. On Friday, at the ceremony marking a quarter-century since that morning, she said that Saudi Arabia still evades responsibility for the attacks, and that the United States has helped it do so.

Terry is national chair of 9/11 Families United. She did not waste the occasion on atmosphere. 

"The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia fomented a rancid culture of anti-American terrorism around the globe, and then sent its agents to support the radical Islamist hijackers so they could attack you and all of our loved ones," Strada said.

Then she turned from the kingdom to the governments that have found it convenient to look away. 

"But for 25 years, administration after administration, including leaders in front of us here today, chose to protect the Saudis instead of standing with the 9/11 families." Vice President JD Vance was in the audience in Lower Manhattan, the most senior official of the Trump administration present. 

President Trump spoke separately at the Pentagon. Strada addressed both. 

"It has been one betrayal after another. President Trump can still change that. Tell the Saudis to stop lying. Tell them that if they want to be friends with the USA, they cannot continue to deny all of this," she said. "Vice President Vance, thank you for being here today. Please carry that message back. Stand with the families. Stand with the survivors. Stand with Americans."

Tom Strada was 41 and worked at Cantor Fitzgerald. Days before the attacks, he and his wife had brought their third child home from the hospital. After the plane hit, he called her and said he was heading toward the stairwell. 

That is the human fact over which the diplomacy has been conducted. Nearly 3,000 people were killed at the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and aboard the hijacked aircraft. Since then Strada has become one of the most persistent advocates for something rarer than remembrance: an accounting. She is among the thousands of family members and survivors who sued Saudi Arabia, alleging that the kingdom provided material support to the al Qaeda hijackers. 

Saudi Arabia has repeatedly denied the allegations. Denial has been its posture for a generation and they are liars, plain and simple.

Last August a federal judge, George B. Daniels, ruled there was "reasonable evidence" that two Saudi government employees supported two future al Qaeda hijackers who entered the United States in early 2000 and took flight lessons. The judge allowed the case to proceed and rejected the kingdom's attempt to have it dismissed.

For more than a decade after the attacks, sovereign immunity made such a suit almost impossible. That changed in September 2016, when Congress passed the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, known as JASTA, permitting Americans to sue foreign governments accused of providing material support for terrorist attacks on American soil.

President Barack Hussein  Obama vetoed the bill. 

He argued that it threatened "to strip all foreign governments of immunity from judicial process in the United States based solely upon allegations by private litigants." 

Congress overrode the veto within days. The lawsuit against Saudi Arabia was filed in March 2017. It remains pending. 

These clowns laughed while families gave tribute to their dead loved ones

So the scene on Friday was not merely ceremonial. A woman whose husband died on the 104th floor told the officials in front of her that friendship with Riyadh has been purchased, year after year, at the expense of the dead and of the people left to bury them. Whether anyone in power intends to treat that as more than an awkward interlude at a memorial is another question. Strada, at least, declined to pretend that time had settled it.

She has bigger cajones than all the politicians who attended the memorial. Every one of them.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

The Mayor Who Cannot Name the Murderers

There are occasions when a politician is required to say what happened. September 11 is one of them.

Nearly 3,000 people were murdered by Islamist terrorists. They were not unfortunate extras in some abstract pageant of global suffering. They were not incidental casualties of an unspecified “war that followed.” They were murdered by men who hijacked passenger aircraft and flew them into buildings on purpose. It is hard to think of a historical fact that requires less interpretation.

Yet the words of New York City’s Mayor, Zohran Mamdani, have raised the awkward question of whether he means to mark the day as an act of remembrance or as another occasion to lecture the public about the consequences of American foreign policy.

A post from 2023 has resurfaced. “Nearly 3,000 New Yorkers died on 9/11; 22 years later, the death hasn't stopped. We mourn our neighbors who died that day. The hundreds of thousands who died in the wars that followed. The unknown millions injured & displaced. In their memory, we work toward a better world,” Mamdani wrote on X in 2023.

There is nothing objectionable in mourning civilians killed in later wars. There is nothing objectionable in wanting a better world. There is something peculiar, however, in commemorating the greatest terrorist attack in American history without mentioning the terrorists.

The sentence contains the dead. It contains the wars. It contains the injured and the displaced. It contains the pious hope of a better world. What it does not contain is the word “terrorists.” Nor does it say that the nearly 3,000 New Yorkers were murdered. This may appear a small matter of wording. To the families of the dead it is not.

Some of those families are now asking that Mamdani stay away from New York’s 25th-anniversary commemoration. Their unease has only grown after his interview with Hasan Piker, who said in 2019, “America deserved 9/11.”

Mamdani first declined to condemn the remark. He later called it “objectionable and reprehensible.” One might have thought that identifying as reprehensible the claim that America deserved to be attacked by terrorists would be the easy part. Apparently even that required a pause for reflection.

Marc Thiessen, who was inside the Pentagon when the planes hit, was less given to philosophical hesitation. “As someone who was in the Pentagon when the planes hit, this is absolutely disgraceful. You have no business ever setting foot at Ground Zero, much less on 9/11. If you dare show up, I hope you are greeted with such a Bronx cheer that you slink away in shame,” wrote Thiessen.

New York City Councilwoman Inna Vernikov was no more impressed. “I guess they all just ‘died’ in an accident? And then you wonder why the families of 9/11 victims don’t want you at the ceremony. Stay home, Mamdani,” wrote Vernikov.

Florida Rep. Randy Fine was blunter still. “Nearly 25 years later, NYC’s Mayor is in bed with Muslim terrorists and refuses to call out evil for what it is. Unfortunately, it seems the city forgot when they elected Jihadi Mamdani mayor. But we never will,” wrote Fine.

Fox News contributor and former NYPD officer Paul Mauro offered the mayor some advice. “You've made this easy. Don't show up on 9/11 this year -- or any year. We're not interested in your moral equivalency, nepo baby. Stick to the parlor communism daddy taught you. You and your buddy Piker can spend the day practicing Mandarin,” he said.

Michael La Rosa, a former spokesman for first lady DOCTOR Jill Biden, captured the general reaction with economy. “Is this real?”

Nancy Mace had no interest in economy of that kind. “Americans were MURDERED by TERRORISTS in the most horrific way,” she wrote.

Joey Jones, co-host of “Big Weekend Show,” put the matter more personally. “What a coward. They were murdered and sleep well at night knowing I and thousands of my brothers did our part to even the f—–g score,” he wrote.

The argument is not about whether wars produce suffering. Everyone knows that they do. It is about whether September 11 can be spoken of without first stating the most elementary moral fact of the day.The terrorists did this. They chose their targets. They chose their victims. They chose to murder thousands of people. And those who died were not responsible for the wars that followed their deaths.

That is why the language used to commemorate September 11 matters. There are many days in the year for arguing about American foreign policy. There are fewer for remembering 3,000 people who were murdered because Islamist terrorists decided they should die.

Mamdani says he intends to attend the commemoration to honor the victims, survivors, families and first responders alongside Vice President JD Vance and former presidents, including Biden and Bush. Some of the families would prefer that he think again.

A petition organized by several victims’ families asks the organizers to consider whether his presence is appropriate to the purpose of the ceremony. “We respectfully ask that the organizers carefully consider whether Mr. Mamdani’s participation would align with the intention of the ceremony and the expectations of the families most directly affected by the tragedy,” a Change.org petition states.

It is a reasonable question.

There is a difference between remembering that thousands of people were killed and remembering why they were killed. The first requires memory. The second requires moral clarity.

On September 11, 2001, New York did not suffer an unfortunate episode in the general history of human misery. It was attacked. And nearly 3,000 people were murdered. For the families who lost them, that remains difficult to forget. One would hope the mayor of New York could manage the same.

I will always remember the soot from office papers that ended up in the gutters of my Brooklyn home.

What do you remember about that day 25 years ago?

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Islamic charity does verbal calisthenics to find a way to blame the Jews for 911

WASHINGTON, D.C. , In what education experts are calling a bold new approach to history, the Council on American-Islamic Relations has reportedly released a school resource guide suggesting that the September 11 terrorist attacks were less about Islamic terrorism and more about America's unfortunate habit of supporting Israel, you know, the Jooooooze!

The guide, released as part of CAIR's “Back to school resource guide,” was apparently designed to help teachers explain the 2001 attacks to a new generation of students who might otherwise make the historically outrageous mistake of believing that terrorists were responsible for the terrorism. 

How Canadian Broadcasting Corporation of them, eh.

Thankfully, the guide appears to have been removed shortly after its publication, presumably after someone remembered that telling American children that their country basically had it coming for supporting Israel might not be considered traditional civics education. But I bet it wasn't Randi Weingarten who had the guides removed.

Among the guide's more creative historical formulations was the claim that the attacks were carried out not by Islamic terrorists, but by a “group self-identifying as Al Qaeda hailing from the mountains of Afghanistan.” In fact, some of them may have even looked Jewish.

This distinction is important. After all, if a group calling itself Al Qaeda hijacks four airplanes, murders nearly 3,000 people and attacks the Pentagon and World Trade Center, the least we can do is carefully avoid jumping to conclusions about whether it might have had anything to do with Islamic terrorism.

The guide also cited American support for Israel and the U.S. military's involvement in the Gulf War as grievances that supposedly helped justify attacks against the United States. In other words, we had it coming. 

Apparently, the terrorists had grievances, America had foreign policy, Israel existed, and therefore everyone can go home with a B-plus in History.

The guide's explanation of the aftermath of 9/11 was even more remarkable. According to the materials, the Global War on Terror helped create an “Islamophobic” culture in which the words “terrorism” and “terrorist” were supposedly applied primarily to Muslims.

“While Islamophobia and anti-Muslim racism existed long before the 9/11 attacks, this time period marked a stark shift in US policy and state sponsored Islamophobia in the U.S. and abroad. There was immediate backlash against anyone perceived to be Muslim,” the propaganda read.

Of course, there was also an immediate backlash against people who flew airplanes into buildings, murdered civilians and attacked the Pentagon. But apparently that distinction was considered too nuanced for the back-to-school crowd.

The guide also included terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden's “Letter to America” as “resource material,” apparently because nothing says "educational enrichment" quite like assigning students the writings of the man responsible for the murder of thousands of Americans.

Among the gems included in bin Laden's letter was this passage:

“Your law is the law of the rich and wealthy people, who hold sway in their political parties, and fund their election campaigns with their gifts. Behind them stand the Jews, who control your policies, media and economy.”

Somewhere in Israel, a history teacher is presumably preparing a lesson explaining that this is definitely not antisemitic, but merely another example of America's complicated relationship with foreign policy.

Nicholas Haros Jr., whose mother Frances was killed on 9/11, wasn't buying it.

“The further we get from 9/11, this new generation of kids will learn to blame our country. These kids are going to be poisoned – and that’s the intent.”

Sen. Tom Cotton had already warned about CAIR's efforts to influence American schools nearly a year earlier.

“I write to alert you to the Council on American-Islamic Relations’s (CAIR) efforts to influence K-12 schools … It is well documented that CAIR has deep ties to pro-Hamas terrorist organizations and publicly supports Hamas’s terrorist activities,” Cotton wrote in part.

“Such an organization should never have access to our nation’s children,” he asserted, adding, “The organization offers ‘educational’ materials on its website that perpetuate pro-terrorist, anti-Israel rhetoric. CAIR Philadelphia recently issued guidance for educators titled ‘Remembering and Reflecting: Teaching September 11, 2001, in Diverse Classrooms.’ The guide directs teachers to avoid using ‘inaccurate and inflammatory terms such as ‘Islamic terrorists,’ ‘jihadists,’ or ‘radical Islamic terrorists,’’ when describing the September 11 terrorists.”

“The U.S. Department of Education must ensure that CAIR is not given an opportunity to push its radical, pro-terrorist, anti-Israel ideology on American schoolchildren,” he concluded.

The whole episode raises an important question for American parents: When their children come home from school saying that Israel somehow caused 9/11, should parents correct them, or simply congratulate them for successfully completing Advanced Blame-America Studies?

Fortunately, there remains one group that cannot be blamed for the attacks: Israel.

But give the education establishment another semester and somebody will probably assign that possibility as extra credit.

Thanks for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Biden-Harris admin. dance backwards over plea deal for 911 mass murderers

First, you say, you do

And then you don't

And then you say, you will

And then you won't

You're undecided now

So what are you gonna do?

Those are some of the words to a song titled "Undecided," sung by the immortal Ella Fitzgerald and Louis Armstrong. It seems like this should be the theme song for the Biden-Harris administration. They change their mind more often than Biden changes his skivvies.

The Biden Administration made a significant U-turn in the plea deal for the accused 911 terrorists on Friday, a group of scumbags responsible for killing 2,977 people in New York City's Twin Towers on that clear, sunny Tuesday morning. 

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed [aka KSM] was the principal architect behind the attacks that day. He played a critical role in planning, organizing, and executing the plot.

He is credited with presenting the idea of a large-scale attack using hijacked commercial airlines, to Osama bin Laden and after getting the go-ahead from that scumbag, began to plan the operation.

KSM oversaw the target selection, logistics, recruitment of Muslims who believe by killing non-Muslims in a suicide event, they would go to Paradise (Jannah), and he also trained them and dealt with the financing and operational support of the evil mission known as Islamic jihad.

KSM was also the person who beheaded US journalist Daniel Pearl in Pakistan in 2002. If anyone on the planet deserves to be put down like a dog, it's KSM.

KSM's arrest was a significant event in the U.S.-led War on Terror. He was captured on March 1, 2003, in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, and subsequently held in U.S. custody. Later, he was transferred to the Guantanamo Bay detention camp, where he faces charges for his role in the attacks. His trial has been delayed multiple times due to legal and procedural issues.

He was facing the death penalty, along with Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin Attash, and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi who have been held in Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp [aka Gitmo]. But the Biden-Harris administration had a plea deal with the terrorists that would remove the death penalty if they plead guilty to myriad charges.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin fell on the proverbial sword for the Biden-Harris administration, a walked back the plea deal for the 911 mastermind, and allowed Biden to pretend he only heard about the plea deal just a day before it was offered, and Harris to avoid dealing with the administration's involvement.

The only reason Austin rejected the plea deal was due to the blowback the administration received by the families of the dead.

Austin also relieved Brigadier General Susan K Escallier, the Biden DEI official overseeing the case, from her duties.

So, the death penalty is still on the table for the accused jihadi scum.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) castigated the Biden-Harris administration's "cowardice," and said it was a disgrace. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) was astounded that this administration has "done the unthinkable."

I personally hope to hear Escallier's explanation as to what the hell she was thinking.

Finally, why did Biden allegedly learn about the plea deal just one day prior to it being considered? Oh wait--it's because he's senile and forgot that he knew about it, along with his VP Chuckles the Clown--and it only got walked back when they discovered how it would cause the Party to lose millions of American votes.

Tweet

Mother of US hero angry Prince Harry got her son's award: "I am shocked"

Medals L-R: for holding in flatulence; for learning to fly; 
for marrying Meghan Markle; for being born in royalty. The
silver cross is for the loss of his testicles from said marriage

Pat Tillman was an NFL safety who joined the Army Rangers after the September 11, 2001 attack. He put his football career on the back-burner and risked his life for his country. Sadly, he was killed in a firefight, and it is believed it came from friendly fire. But that's irrelevant--it was his bravery and sacrifice that matters.

ESPN, the far-left sports network, has decided to honor Prince Harry with the Pat Tillman Award because a) he isn't American; b) he isn't heroic; and c) conservatives tend to think of him as a castrated schmuck. This is what happens when a sports network gets involved in politics and forgets that their viewers watch them for sports.

Mary Tillman, Pat's mother, said she was never consulted by the far-left network to give the Duke of Sussex the American award named after her son. 

“I am shocked as to why they would select such a controversial and divisive individual to receive the award,” Mary told the Daily Mail. 

 
“There are recipients that are far more fitting,” she added. “There are individuals working in the veteran community that are doing tremendous things to assist veterans.” The only thing that Harry does is Meghan's bidding. 

She added that Harry is already famous and has received numerous awards in his life, so ESPN should have chosen someone else who’s never been in the spotlight [and has actually done some good for others].

The Pat Tillman Award has often been given to unsung heroes, with last year’s recipient being the Buffalo Bills training staff who revived a player who had suffered a cardiac arrest in the middle of a game. Harry has never revived anyone. 

Pat Tillman

Mary said she was confused as to why ESPN would choose such a polarizing figure [who is married to an even more polarizing B actress]. 

Mary’s condemnation was echoed by ESPN analysts Pat McAfee, who accused his own network on Friday of "trying to piss people off" by selecting Harry for the award.

“It’s going to Prince Harry,” McAfee said on his talk show, “who I don’t even think is a Prince anymore, right? He said don’t call me that? See, why does the ESPYs do this s–t?

“This is like actually the most embarrassing thing I’ve seen in my entire life,” he added.

Mary Tillman

In picking Harry and others to receive honors during the upcoming ESPY Awards (Excellence in Sports Performance Yearly), Kate Jackson, VP, Production at ESPN, touted the recipients as those who have changed the world.

“These honorees have used their platforms to change the world and make it more inclusive for marginalized and suffering communities, demonstrating incredible resilience, positivity and perseverance, and we’re thrilled to celebrate them at the 2024 ESPYs,” Jackson said.

Tillman, a former safety for the Arizona Cardinals, served in Iraq and then Afghanistan before he was killed by friendly fire in 2004, with the soldier posthumously awarded the Silver Star and Purple Heart for his service.

Tweet

No Plea Deal for 911 terrorists: GOP House Reps + 1 Dem. Urge Biden Regime

In a virtue-signaling move for incarcerated terrorists who killed Americans at home and abroad, the Biden regime has considered a potential plea deal to show them that there are no hard feelings.

However, a bipartisan group of House Representatives are demanding that Biden's handler[s] do not go forward with such a deal for the accused 9/11 scumcrumpets, which would spare the death penalty for mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) and other defendants.

The note was drafted by Rep. Michael Lawler (R-NY) and was joined by Democrat Rep. Pat Rylan and 32 other GOP members of Congress including Reps. Elise Stefanik, Nicole Malliotakis, Nick Langworthy, Andrew Garbarino, Anthony D’Esposito, Claudia Tenney and Nick Lalota. 

The remainder of congress members who did not sign the bill are apparently okay with KSM having beheaded Daniel Pearl, a Jewish reporter for the Wall Street Journal, on video in Pakistan.

“If true, this would be a grave miscarriage of justice, especially for the families of the 2,977 innocent civilians and first responders we lost that fateful day,” the NY lawmakers said in an Aug. 23 letter to so called President Biden. 

[H/T The New York Post]

“We owe it to the victims and their families to deliver justice – and that should mean the death penalty for these murderers. We urge your Administration not to enter into any pre-trial agreements which would remove the possibility of the death penalty and to work to conclude this process to see justice meted out on those who have committed these evil acts,” the letter stated.

“As we approach the 22nd anniversary of September 11th, it is both outrageous and deeply disappointing that the Biden administration would even consider negotiating a plea deal with the masterminds of the worst terrorist attack in our nation’s history. They must immediately cease any plea deal negotiations, especially if it doesn’t include the death penalty,” said Rep. Lawler.

The woke and highly diverse Pentagon sent a letter to families of those murdered on September 11, 2001 stating that deals are being considered in which five terrorists would  “accept criminal responsibility for their actions and plead guilty….in exchange for not receiving the death penalty.”

Big deal. We know they did it--they bragged about it.

The prosecution of KSM and four other terrorists held at the US detention center in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has been a clusterfrack of repeated delays and legal disputes, especially over the legal ramifications of the interrogation under torture that the scumbags initially underwent that likely saved American lives, while in CIA custody. 

No trial date has been set.

“The Office of the Chief Prosecutor has been negotiating and is considering entering into pre-trial agreements,” the letter informed families, adding that while no plea agreement “has been finalized, and may never be finalized, it is possible that a [pre-trial agreement] in this case would remove the possibility of the death penalty.” 

Some relatives of the 2,977 people killed outright in the terror attacks rightly expressed outrage over the prospect of ending the case short of a verdict.

The military prosecutors pledged to take their views into consideration and present them to the military authorities, who would make the final decision on accepting any plea agreement.

The outrageous plea negotiations have understandably provoked a backlash from families of the victims of the 9/11 attacks and first responders, including then-city Fire Department Commissioner Tom Von Essen, who lost 343 firefighters when the World Trade Centers collapsed.

The 9/11 hearings have been on hold while military officials examine whether one of the defendants is competent to stand trial. Hearings are set to resume Sept. 18.

My own house in Brooklyn was about 4 miles from where the Twin Towers had stood and I had to remove burnt paper from the gutters of my roof. I performed psychotherapy for some of the family members who lost loved ones and others who escaped the buildings. I say death is too good for those bastards, but it's a good start.

Tweet

Biden faces rebellion as 'Rank and file' will openly refuse orders, risk termination

Biden shakes hands with his sainted mother

Many members of the U.S. Air Marshals service have taken all they can with the Biden administration's abuse of their service. Specifically, Biden's handlers have decided to remove air marshals from flights and instead have them work on the southern border with illegal aliens. So rather than protecting the flying public and targets on the ground as per 911 showed us, Biden wants to use the marshals as alien sitters at the Mexican border to feed, transport and care for the tens of thousands of illegal aliens waltzing across the border creating the crisis we now have.

[H/T Washington Examiner]

Thus, many of the air marshals are reportedly planning an open rebellion. They  are organizing to resist this ridiculous use of their manpower that is, as they put it, turning them into babysitters. They are willing to defy these orders via an organized campaign that some secretly call the FJB movement.

“The rank-and-file air marshals are going to refuse to deploy and risk termination,” David Londo, president of the Air Marshal National Council, recently told the Washington Examiner. “You’re almost going to have a mutiny of a federal agency, which is unheard of.”

The report says that Biden is leaving a paltry one in 100 flights staffed with an air marshal, leaving flights at one-eighth of its normal protection rate. [Just don't mention this to any terrorists, please.]

Londo told the paper that the air marshals’ morale is extremely low for being forced to perform menial tasks to care for illegal border crossers that the Democrats hope will vote for them.

“Morale is so destroyed from this,” Londo said. “I’ve never seen anything like this.”

Londo added that air marshals have gone from performing a serious law enforcement job by protecting the safety of the public flying on U.S. airlines to “heating up sandwiches,” driving illegals around to hospitals and other appointments, as well as babysitting illegals in detention centers on the border. 

However, as of this writing, no marshals have been assigned to change Biden's adult diaper.

“It is known that these highly skilled [air marshals] are being made to perform mainly non-law enforcement civilian humanitarian duties,” Londo said in a public letter obtained by the Examiner, warning of action by the marshals.

The issue began in 2021 when the Biden Department of Homeland Security asked the Federal Air Marshal Service to ask for volunteers who would be willing to go to the southern border for a 30-day stint to help care for the millions of illegals streaming across the border. But by December 7, when the volunteer request didn't pan out, the DHS switched gears from “volunteers” to orders by diverting 150 additional air marshals to babysitting duties.

Last week, the Federal Air Marshal Service’s Miami Field Office announced that the redeployments will last indefinitely, thus the air marshals will no longer be performing their rightful task protecting our air traffic but instead will be more or less permanently attached as babysitters for illegals.

Currently, air marshals have been redeployed to stations in El Paso, Laredo, and McAllen, Texas; San Diego; and Tucson and Yuma, Arizona, per the Examiner.

Londo and his organization (which is not a union, but an association) warned that the new orders makes the skies less safe for Americans traveling during the holidays.

“According to the Federal Aviation Administration year to date there have been 2,178 reports of unruly passengers, 767 investigations initiated, and 517 enforcement actions taken. Not to mention the fact there has been two attempted attacks on our homeland since 9-11 during the holiday season,” Londo’s letter states. “Your policy has resulted in a complete loss of confidence in Secretary Mayorkas, FAM Director Stevenson, and Administrator Pekoske’s ability to lead DHS/TSA/FAMS.”

“During these deployments, air marshals are not using their law enforcement skills to help secure the border, but are tasked with non-law enforcement jobs, including janitorial duties,” the NAPO letter states.

Ironically, our own President of the United States is not even capable of being a babysitter, much less a janitor.

Tweet

Shannon Brandt, who 'ran over' Cayler Ellingson charged with murder

Shannon Brandt, 41, is the scumwafer who is accused of fatally using his SUV as a weapon, allegedly killing 18-year-old Cayler Ellingson. Brandt has been charged with murder and new information alleges that Ellingson was indeed run over by an SUV.

Brandt was initially arrested after police say he fatally hit Ellingson with an SUV in the early morning of September 18 after a street dance that took place at a local bar in McHenry, North Dakota. Brandt fled the scene and later called 911 claiming that Ellingson was part of a "Republican extremist group," and added that the teenager was calling on others to come "get him."

He was sent to jail and released on $50,000 bail. He was not placed on house arrest but told that he could not leave North Dakota or drink.

Ellingson was rushed to a local hospital after the incident, but later died.

Capt. Bryan Niewind told Fox News Digital that there was "no evidence" that Ellingson was part of a "Republican extremist group" or that the incident had anything to do with politics.

Last Friday, Foster County State Attorney Kara Brinster announced that Brandt is being charged with murder and that the charge of criminal vehicular homicide has been dismissed due to the new murder charge.

Brandt turned himself in on Friday at the Stutsman County Correction Center. 

The murder charges are the result of an investigation by the North Dakota Highway Patrol, Foster County Sheriff’s Department and the North Dakota Bureau of Criminal Investigation. A probable cause affidavit for the new charges states that Brandt asked the 911 operator if he was going to prison.

"I just wanna ask you a question, am I going to prison?," Brandt asked the 911 operator, according to the document. During the call, Brandt "made comments regarding the incident being intentional and not an accident," according to the affidavit.

According to the affidavit, when the 911 operator asked "he wouldn't let your vehicle go then what happened," Brandt then responded "yes I…I just tried to take off and , he . . . he wasn't going to let me go, I, I hit him I didn't mean to and and he's subdued I was scared to death but he's subdued, he can't do anything to me now so, so this is why I'm calling you."

"I mean I…I almost oh god, I almost just runaway but I thought jeez obviously if it was a total accident I wouldn't be scared but I know it was more than that," Brandt said, according to the affidavit.

Ellingson called his mother before Brandt admitted to using an SUV to hit him, the affidavit states. He told the 911 operator that "he' or 'they' were chasing him." His mother told her son that she was "on her way to get him" prior to that call, the affidavit stated.

Brandt also told the 911 operator that Ellingson "wouldn't let him leave" and made a call to someone saying "something to the effect of your going to have to come here and handle him."

Which seems bogus based on what we now know, because during the time period between 2:00 a.m. and 2"42 a.m., the teenager only called and received calls to his parents. So Brandt appears to be lying.

An autopsy performed on Ellingson indicated that his injuries were caused by being "ran over" by the SUV, and not by being struck by the front of the car. Clearly this indicates that the murder was intentional.

Ellingson's last call with his mother was at 2:42 a.m., when he stated "something to the effect of they are after me or he is after me," and the call dropped, according to the affidavit.

Brandt was due in court on Friday morning for a bond hearing.

On a Sept. 19th court hearing, Brandt disagreed with the proposed bail amount, stating that he is not a flight risk and has a life that he needs to get back to.

"I have a job, a life and a house and things that I don't exactly want to see go by the wayside — family that are very important to me," Brandt said.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Ellingson also had a life, a family and friends, and Brandt took that from him.

Ellingson's funeral was held on Monday.

Tweet

Brian Williams recalls how he guided people to safety in the Twin Tower 911 attack

Brian Williams after his heroic rescue of hundreds of souls

"It was perhaps the toughest day in my life," 'NBC's Nightly News' ace reporter Brian Williams began. "I was the first to realize that the horrific explosion wasn't Michael Moore passing gas; it was the distinct sound of an airliner hitting the building next to the one I was in on that spectacularly clear day on September 11th, 2001.

"I was in the South Tower when the plane struck the North Tower. I saw the smoke belching out through the windows above my location across the way and I knew I had to act quickly. 'Run!' I screamed as calmly as I could, but nobody responded. The crowd of people just walked over to the windows and looked up at the devastation, not knowing what had happened. 

"But I knew. I knew this was a terrorist attack because I was a Middletown Township firefighter and drew on that experience to make the call. Instantly, I went into "save lives mode."

As he spoke, a tear meandered along the side of his crooked nose, a nose that broke when Williams played football at Mater Dei High School in New Jersey in a game that he won almost single-handedly by scoring "about seven touchdowns," he explained.

"After the second plane hit our building, only then did people in the office take me seriously. A guy named Mike something or other, yelled, 'Save us, Brian!' and he and his colleagues followed me down the stairs as I led seven hundred souls to safety.

"But I don't want anyone to sing me praises or pat me on the back. I just did what the good Lord intended for me to do here on Earth. To make a difference and to be all that I can be."

And if you believe this story, then you might also believe that chickens have lips.

Have a blessed, peaceful, and safe day.

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

Tweet

Some People Said Something

The Democrats are making a big deal over the blowback from Ilhan Omar's (D-MN) statement about the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 in which nearly 3,000 Americans were killed by "scripture-strict" Muslims. Omar described the horrors of the attack to the Council of American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as "some people did something."

President Trump showed a video of what some people did that day to contrast her words with what happened.

Now Omar and the Democrats, led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, are concerned that Omar's life is in danger from the words she said and the fact that Trump illustrated what happened that day.

Omar and her party need to understand that, like her description of 9/11, all that resulted is that some people said something. At least they allegedly said something, but I don't believe the claim has been verified and I don't tend to believe politicians when they try to make political hay.

It rained yesterday--that's Trump's fault.



Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet

Ilhan Omar blames Fox News and Crenshaw for 'dangerous incitement' against her

Anti-Semite Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) claims Fox News and Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) caused "dangerous incitement" against her after Fox's Brian Kilmeade and Crenshaw voiced shock Wednesday over how she minimized the description of the 9-11 terror attacks of 2001.

Omar spoke at an event in late March for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) — an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood and which the United Arab Emirates has designated as a terrorist organization. She described the 9/11 terror attacks as "some people did something."

Stunned by the remarks, which went viral this week, Crenshaw tweeted on Tuesday: "First Member of Congress to ever describe terrorists who killed thousands of Americans on 9/11 as 'some people who did something'. Unbelievable."

On Wednesday, Kilmeade also expressed shock over her Islamist-sounding comments, saying: "Really? Some people did something? You have to wonder if she’s an American first."

"As a Muslim American you should be more outraged because they sullied your religion," Kilmeade continued. "In the name of religion they kill Americans and still do it on a daily basis."

Omar also said in the speech that due to the 9-11 attacks CAIR was formed because an organization was needed to protect the rights of Muslims.

This was a lie in so many ways.

First of all, CAIR was formed in 1994, years before the attack. It was presented as an advocate organization for Muslims but was later designated as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land terror-funding trials.

Second of all, Muslims didn't have any special need to have their rights protected. The fact that Omar is a U.S. Representative lends proof to that, but Islamists all too often play the victim card. You'd almost think they were Democrats.

Omar responded to the criticisms by tweeting: "This is dangerous incitement, given the death threats I face. I hope leaders of both parties will join me in condemning it. My love and commitment to our country and that of my colleagues should never be in question. We are ALL Americans!"

Except for the Jews, Omar suggested, because they have a "dual allegiance." She is clearly an anti-Semite who has helped turned the Democrat Party into anti-Semitic enablers.

Kilmeade responded to Omar's tweet with a tweet of his own, writing: "I didn't intend to question whether Rep. Omar is an American - I am questioning how any American, let alone a United States Congresswoman, could downplay the 9/11 attacks."

Crenshaw also fired back at Omar, tweeting: "1. I never called you un-American. 2. I did not incite any violence against you. 3. You described an act of terrorism on American soil that killed thousands of innocent lives as 'some people did something.' It’s still unbelievable, as is your response here."

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested that Omar, who has been repeatedly condemned by Congressional leaders over her anti-Semitism, was "anti-American" last month when she was speaking at AIPAC. But beyond that, nothing has been done to admonish Omar and she still sits on the Foreign Affairs Committee.

"This month, the full House came together to condemn the anti-Semitic myth of dual loyalty, and all forms of bigotry, with a resolution that 'rejects the perpetuation of anti-Semitic stereotypes in the United States and around the world, including the pernicious myth of dual loyalty and foreign allegiance, especially in the context of support for the United States-Israel alliance,'" Pelosi said with her hands and to her credit. "I simply declare to be anti-Semitic is to be anti-American. It has no place in our country."

Retired Deputy Chief Jim Riches FDNY, whose firefighter son Jimmy Riches was killed on 9/11, slammed Omar in an op-ed published in the New York Post on Wednesday.

"What Congresswoman Ilhan Omar said about Sept. 11 was disgraceful," Riches wrote. "She dismissed thousands of people being murdered like it was an everyday occurrence when she said “some people did something."

"I think Omar owes an apology to America. She owes an apology to the families," Riches continued. "She came here from Somalia. She was educated here. We took care of her. And now she’s saying 911 was nothing?"

No, apologies are garbage. Everyone throws one out now and then in order to appease others.

"Until the time that you realize the importance of 9/11 as the worst day in American history, I call for your removal from Congress," Riches concluded.

Now that's the way to go. No apology--just throw the bum out.


Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.





Tweet

AOC believes we should have left Osama bin Laden alone after 911

Apparent anti-Semite and socialist cretin Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Dummy-NY) tweeted that the United States should have sat on our collective hands after the 911 attacks--the deadliest terrorist attack in world history--and allowed Osama bin Laden and his terrorist organization to live in peace. She didn't put it in exactly those words, but that's exactly what she meant.

AOC's support of the terrorists came in defense of another clearly anti-Semite, Repulsive Ilhan Omar (Dirtbag-MN) in her most recent anti-Semitic remarks from over the weekend.

"It is disturbing that Rep. Omar continues to perpetuate hurtful anti-Semitic stereotypes that misrepresent our Jewish community. Additionally, questioning support for the U.S.-Israel relationship is unacceptable," Democrat Rep. Juan Vargas (CA) tweeted. "Israel has and remains a stalwart ally of the United States because of our countries’ shared interests and values. I condemn her remarks and believe she should apologize for her offensive comments."

Ocasio-Cortez responded with a lie, suggesting that Vargas was calling out Omar's foreign policy stances, not her anti-Semitism. Anyone can criticize Israel's policies, but Omar is not suggesting that, she has made it clear many times that she does not believe Israel has the right to exist. That's pure anti-Semitism.

"I‘m curious if Rep. Vargas will further explain his stance here that it’s unacceptable to even *question* US foreign policy," Ocasio-Cortez dishonestly said in a tweet. "Plenty of Dem members have asserted that discussion + debate on this issue is fair and merited. Is this stance a departure from that?"

Ocasio-Cortez continued with another tweet that contained a truckload of bullcrap: "I remember a time when it was 'unacceptable' to question the Iraq War. All of Congress was wrong, including both GOP & Dem Party, and led my generation into a disastrous + wrong war that virtually all would come to regret, except for the one member who stood up: Barbara Lee."

After being called out for the tweet's inaccuracies, Ocasio-Cortez clarified that she meant the Afghanistan war, and added: "(But honestly we shouldn’t have been in either, and we should end the AUMF now while we’re at it)."

Ocasio-Crapweasel plainly stated that "all of Congress was wrong" was to vote in favor of the Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF) and that Barbara Lee [an anti-American leftist] was correct for not voting for it.

"The AUMF was passed with Lee’s lone dissenting vote on Sept. 14, 2001, three days after terrorists from Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda organization crashed commercial airliners into the World Trade Center, Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania killing more than 3,000 people," The Huffington Post reported.

The Hill noted that the AUMF "authorizes the president 'to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons'— in other words, al Qaeda and the Taliban regime in Afghanistan."

Evidently, AOC and her co-terrorist supporters don't believe the terrorists were wrong in killing Americans.


I hope you'll follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.






Tweet

40 years in prison for jihadi planner of next 911

The "S" stands for Schmuck
Photo: Global News

Abdulrahman El Bahnasawy, the 20-year-old jihadi who admitted to planning the next 9-11 was sentenced to 40 years in prison for planning multiple attacks in New York City.

The young Muslim jihadi "planned to detonate bombs in Times Square and the New York City subway system, and to shoot civilians at concert venues," U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said. "El Bahnasawy aspired, in his words, to 'create the next 9/11'."

El Bahnasawy is a Canadian citizen due to the incredibly liberal immigration laws Prime Minister Justin Trudeau [aka: Latke, from "Taxi"] has allowed. He was arrested in May 2016 on his way from Canada to New York where he was plotting with Talha Haroon, a 20-year-old U.S. citizen arrested in Pakistan, and Russell Salic, a 38-year-old orthopedic surgeon and citizen of the Philippines, who was arrested in the Philippines, and thus proving to all libtards that jihadism has nothing to do with economic status or education--it's all about extremist Islam.

The plans included a huge attack on Times Square, where the men planned to trap people inside the area called Crossroads of the World “and kill as many people as possible.” Nothing personal, just religion.

A shooting attack was also planned for New York’s crowded subway lines. The attackers planned to wear suicide vests and blow themselves up before being apprehended or killed. [At that point they were to ascend to paradise and be rewarded with 72 brown-eyed virgins and rivers of wine.]

They also researched upcoming concerts in the city and talked about choosing “a concert hall that (is) far away from cops.” In other words, 'gun-free zones.'

Another plan was to attack a Jewish neighborhood because that's how the religion of peace rolls when it comes to anti-Semitism.

Possible dates mentioned for the attacks were during the month of Ramadan or on Memorial Day 2016.

El Bahnasawy purchased bomb-making materials and rented a cabin he intended to use to build the explosive devices. Haroon, after meeting bomb experts in Pakistan, planned to travel to New York to help. Salic, the rich doctor, was charged with funding the operation by wiring money from the Philippines.

The men spoke with each other through chat apps, possibly, and quite ironically, invented by an Israeli. El Bahnasawy was caught when he communicated with an undercover agent posing as an ISIS sympathizer. LOL.

Haroon allegedly texted the same agent, “NY Needs to fall. This is a must.” He also said he wanted to “cause great destruction to the filthy (disbelievers) by our hands.” Ironically again, most disbelievers don't smell as badly as these guys do.

According to those familiar with the case, the arrests weren't the result of a sting operation; instead, FBI and NYPD investigators were aware of El Bahnasawy  early on in the planning stages.

In one message, El Bahnasawy wrote, “(W)e seriously need a car bomb at Times Square…Look at these crowds of people!” In another communication, he said he wanted to “shoot up concerts cuz they kill a lot of people…(W)e just walk in with guns in our hands…That’s how the Paris guys did it.”

Haroon spoke of the subway as a “perfect” target and spoke of killing as many people as possible on a “very busy day,” not stopping even if there were “women or kids.” After shooting as many people as possible on the subway, Haroon added that if they “get trapped” or “when we run out of bullets we let the vests go off.”

Definitely not nice guys, but a religious ones.

Notice how doctor Salic took the least physical risk. Just like an imam who sends others to do his dirty work [or 'wet work'] they aren't willing to die just yet, but they convince others of what a wonderful thing it is to die in the way of Allah.

This one, like others we don't hear about, had a happy ending.

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do. 

I hope you have a wonderful Christmas.

Tweet

Kyrsten Sinema is not on America's side

Kyrsten Sinema, the Democratic Senate candidate, who represents Arizona's 9th District in the House, is as honest as the scorpion talking to a frog.

Last week it was discovered that in 2003, Sinema had promoted campus appearances of Lynne Stewart, the radical lawyer who was being prosecuted for providing material support to terrorism. When Sinema was called out on it, she lied by distorting the facts of the case.

Stewart, who died in 2017, represented the terrorist, Omar Abdel Rahman [aka: the "Blind Sheikh"], who also died in 2017, just weeks before Stewart. Rahman was the jihadi whom Stewart was convicted of abetting; helping him communicate with his Egyptian terrorist mob from the U.S. prison where he was serving a life sentence for his role in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.

In a scorching article in the National Review, Andrew McCarthy, the prosecutor who put Rahman behind bars, counters Sinema's "misrepresentations about her advocacy on Stewart's behalf."

McCarthy refers to Steward as a "jihadist-friendly lawyer," and says that although Sinema portrays herself as a moderate progressive, she is anything but. In 2003, in what Fox News describes as a "now-closed Yahoo group," known as Local to Global Justice, she encouraged people to attend two events in which Stewart was the featured speaker.

This came at a time when Stewart was under federal indictment for providing material support to terrorism and Sinema knew it.

Stewart had two co-defendants, Ahmed Abdel Sattar and Mohammed Yousry, both longtime aides to Abdel Rahman with whom she was accused of facilitating the Blind Sheikh's communication with the Islamic terrorist group,  Gama'at al Islamia, an Egyptian terrorist organization that the Blind Sheikh helped found in the early 1980s, when it participated in the assassination of President Anwar al-Sadat.

When Stewart and her co-scum committed the crimes alleged in the indictment, Abdel Rahman had been convicted in the WTC bombing and subsequent [unsuccessful] plot to bomb New York City landmarks and other terrorist plots.

Gama'at, in an attempt to obtain Abdel Rahman's release, threatened to "target . . . all of those Americans who participated in subjecting [Abdel Rahman's] life to danger" --"every American official, starting with the American president [down] to the despicable jailer."

Perhaps even the prison janitor.

A match made in Jahannam

And six months later, this group of jihadis attacked 58 foreign tourists and several police officers at an archeological site in Luxor, Egypt. They brutally shot them and then sliced them to death. Gama'at left behind leaflets--including the mutilated torso of one of its victims--demanding the Blind Sheikh be released.

The group later issued a statement warning that the forcible struggle against the Egyptian regime would continue unless Mubarak met its 3 demands: implementing sharia [law], the ceasing of diplomatic relations with Israel, and "the return of our Sheikh and emir to his land."

And the killings continued but to no avail.

These are the killers, the jihadis that Stewart helped the Blind Sheikh to consult with and direct by unlawfully transmitting messages, in direct contravention of enhanced confinement measures the DoJ's Bureau of Prisons (BOP) put in place to prevent such communications between the convicted blind scumcrumpet and his minions.

After Stewart's indictment in 2002, she was praised by many radical left-wing morons that opposed a forcible response to the 911 attacks. Sinema's Local to Global Justice was among these groups.

Aside from Sinema's defense of those who want to fight for the Taliban, she also maintained that Stewart was "emphatically not guilty." She said that Stewart was charged only because of surveillance powers enabled by the "hastily enacted PATRIOT Act." She insisted that Stewart was merely "doing her job for the past 27 years as an outspoken criminal defense lawyer."

If Sinema somehow beats Martha McSally, an American combat veteran, in the midterm elections, that would be a tragedy and an indication that the country is going to hell in a hand basket.


Click the "Follow Posts" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.




Tweet

AZ Dem hopeful Kyrsten Sinema said 'I don't care' if people go fight for Taliban against US

In an age of technology, it's difficult for liars to get away with lies. They try to tell their constituents not to believe their eyes and ears--believe what I'm telling you now. Kyrsten Sinema is doing exactly that.

Sinema separately said that she didn't object to individuals going abroad and fighting for our enemies.

Sinema said in a newly resurfaced radio interview: "I don't care" if people go and fight for the Taliban in Afghanistan.

She appeared in a February 2003 radio show hosted by Ernest Hancock, a libertarian activist who presented "The Vally of the Sun" program on local Arizona radio, which is when she made her traitorous statement.

Hancock told Sinema, a Green Party activist, "As an individual, if I want to go fight in the Taliban army, I go over there, and I'm fighting for the Taliban, I'm saying that's a personal decision."

"Fine; I don't care if you go and do that, go ahead," Sinema responded.

Yes, it's a personal decision to fight against your native country, and if you do, you should either be killed, or never be allowed to enter the U.S. again. That's just my opinion.

Sinema also said that the U.S. military went into the Middle East for "a number of reasons," including "oil, power, control" of the region.

Two months after this interview, and a month after the Iraq War began, she told the Arizona Republic that "we should feel compassion" for enemy combatants killed in the country.

Between 2005 and 2006 Sinema co-hosted a radio show with Jeff Farias, a conspiracy theorist who in 2008 signed a petition claiming  the World Trade Center collapsed because explosives were planted inside the buildings by the U.S. Government.

Farias often promoted 911 conspiracy theories during his radio shows up until 2010. And he was the co-master of a 2007 conference that rejected the U.S. government's explanation of the 2001 terror attacks. Naturally, InfoWars founder, Alex Jones was in attendance.

In 2006 Sinema and Farias spoke at an anti-war rally called "End The US Occupation of Iraq." It was sponsored by multiple groups, such as 911 Truth of Arizona, whose mission as they state it is "to expose the official lies and cover-up surrounding the events of September 11, 2001 in a way that inspires the people to overcome denial and understand the truth; namely, that elements within the US government and covert policy apparatus must have orchestrated or participated in the execution of the attacks for these to have happened in the way that they did."

Sinema is running against Republican Martha McSally and had a mere 2 point lead, but this latest information may turn the tables on this far-left America-hater.


Click the "Follow Posts" button in the margin and be sure to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.



Tweet

American Al Qaeda traitor found terrorist life 'extremely boring'

One of the first American scumcrumpets to join Al Qaeda after the September 11 attacks complained the life of a terrorist was "extremely boring" and he never got to kill any fellow Americans.

Bryant Neal Vinas [rhymes with penis] is a convicted terrorist who grew up on Long Island, NY. Six months after 911 Vinas joined the Army  but sucked at being a soldier and was discharged weeks later for "failure to adapt to the military" so he joined Al Qaeda because he just wanted the chance to kill dudes, no matter who they represent.

In 2008 Vinas was detained by Pakistani security forces on terror charges.

The traitorous POS wrote about his time with the terrorist group in Monday's issue of Sentinel, the magazine of the Combating Terrorism Center at the U.S. Military Academy. [It's unknown if Vinas will donate the money to the cause of Islam or just buy gum.]

Vinas converted to Islam in 2007, at the age of 24, because he was looking for a way to justify his homicidal urges. He joined Sunni Muslim militants in Pakistan at a time in his miserable life when he was angry about U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, which is to fight terrorism whenever it threatens our existence.

This was when he joined the terrorist group that had close ties to the unwashed Talilban [pronounce "Tahleebahn" by Barack Obama and Christiane Amanpour]. But he left the group after an aborted attack on U.S. and Afghan forces, when he realized he could get himself killed doing this crap.

"Going on a mission had been such a relief from the terrible boredom, but in the end, I was disappointed that the operation was unsuccessful," he said, but refusing to discuss how he wet his pants on the mission.

His life with the group became difficult as they began living in the mountains where the air is thin and the ground was uneven. He was soon told that in order to be a good jihadi, he would have to attend an Islamic school [known as a madrassa, like Obama attended in Indonesia because he isn't a Muslim].

After Koran classes, he would return to base where he was forced to reassemble old Russian pistols. He soon met up with a group of Arab jihadis who brought him into the Al Qaeda fold.

The Osama bin Laden-group offered the traitor training courses on how to use explosives and weapons, and how to pick up little girls for marriage and their mothers for sex slaves.

"There are days when you do absolutely nothing. There is common frustration amongst many AQ guys about the amount of inactivity. There are few operations to participate in, and even those weren't very good, so the body was not in prime fighting condition for 'mountain fighting' when a fighting mission appeared," he complained. "The only other option was to take classes for missions outside of Pakistan/Afghanistan, but I never knew anybody who took those or went, and I was wary to do so.

The human excrement with lips suggest to Al Qaeda leaders a plot to blow up the Long Island Railroad or a Walmart with all the people in funny clothes with their butt cracks showing. He also took part in attacks on U.S. bases in Afghanistan.

He was eventually arrested and like a good Al Qaeda soldier, decided to spill his guts to U.S. authorities. The information he reportedly gave was used to launch drone strikes on militant positions.

So he was a traitor to both sides.

Rather than executing Vinas for treason, he was released from a federal prison last year and was denied entry into the witness protection program, according to The New York Times.

Speaking of released, hopefully, someone will release his current address.


Follow Brain Flushings and please take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.



Tweet