Mother of US hero angry Prince Harry got her son's award: "I am shocked"

Medals L-R: for holding in flatulence; for learning to fly; 
for marrying Meghan Markle; for being born in royalty. The
silver cross is for the loss of his testicles from said marriage

Pat Tillman was an NFL safety who joined the Army Rangers after the September 11, 2001 attack. He put his football career on the back-burner and risked his life for his country. Sadly, he was killed in a firefight, and it is believed it came from friendly fire. But that's irrelevant--it was his bravery and sacrifice that matters.

ESPN, the far-left sports network, has decided to honor Prince Harry with the Pat Tillman Award because a) he isn't American; b) he isn't heroic; and c) conservatives tend to think of him as a castrated schmuck. This is what happens when a sports network gets involved in politics and forgets that their viewers watch them for sports.

Mary Tillman, Pat's mother, said she was never consulted by the far-left network to give the Duke of Sussex the American award named after her son. 

“I am shocked as to why they would select such a controversial and divisive individual to receive the award,” Mary told the Daily Mail. 

 
“There are recipients that are far more fitting,” she added. “There are individuals working in the veteran community that are doing tremendous things to assist veterans.” The only thing that Harry does is Meghan's bidding. 

She added that Harry is already famous and has received numerous awards in his life, so ESPN should have chosen someone else who’s never been in the spotlight [and has actually done some good for others].

The Pat Tillman Award has often been given to unsung heroes, with last year’s recipient being the Buffalo Bills training staff who revived a player who had suffered a cardiac arrest in the middle of a game. Harry has never revived anyone. 

Pat Tillman

Mary said she was confused as to why ESPN would choose such a polarizing figure [who is married to an even more polarizing B actress]. 

Mary’s condemnation was echoed by ESPN analysts Pat McAfee, who accused his own network on Friday of "trying to piss people off" by selecting Harry for the award.

“It’s going to Prince Harry,” McAfee said on his talk show, “who I don’t even think is a Prince anymore, right? He said don’t call me that? See, why does the ESPYs do this s–t?

“This is like actually the most embarrassing thing I’ve seen in my entire life,” he added.

Mary Tillman

In picking Harry and others to receive honors during the upcoming ESPY Awards (Excellence in Sports Performance Yearly), Kate Jackson, VP, Production at ESPN, touted the recipients as those who have changed the world.

“These honorees have used their platforms to change the world and make it more inclusive for marginalized and suffering communities, demonstrating incredible resilience, positivity and perseverance, and we’re thrilled to celebrate them at the 2024 ESPYs,” Jackson said.

Tillman, a former safety for the Arizona Cardinals, served in Iraq and then Afghanistan before he was killed by friendly fire in 2004, with the soldier posthumously awarded the Silver Star and Purple Heart for his service.

Tweet

Prince Harry may have lied on his visa application or been given special treatment only reserved for non-peons

Meghan Markle's husband, Prince Harry of merry old England, had his immigration status scrutinized by a conservative think tank that believe he may have fibbed on his visa filings. It's also possible that he was given special treatment by President Biden's decision-maker, whoever that is, in the Department of Homeland Security, a government agency that has become as impotent as a sperm donor who was given a photo of "The View" as incentive to perform.

The Heritage Foundation, citing the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) asked the DOH for a copy of Harry's visa file, noting that in order to obtain a residency permit, the person must answer if he or she has ever used illicit drugs. Should the applicant answer "yes," they can be denied the visa. Harry may have answered "no," and that would have been a lie; or he could have simply answered "yes" and lied about his past. 

Either way, he should be investigated.

“I think what happens with this FOIA request has a direct impact on what happens with Harry’s future in the U.S. if indeed he wants to become a permanent U.S. resident or a U.S. citizen,” Nile Gardiner, director of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at the Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Mail.

“The stakes are very high here,” Gardiner added.  “This issue of a visa application has major implications for his future in the United States.”

Seriously? Does anyone really believe that certain individuals are treated the same as the unwashed masses? Harry may be a ginger, an idiot, and a pain in the ass, but he's a royal pain in the ass.

As far as the possibility that Harry argues the DHS documents should remain private, Gardiner stated, “Harry can talk all he likes about protecting privacy, but he’s just written a massive book outlining all of his drug use. I’d say this isn’t a very smart move.”

Nobody ever has accused Harry of being intelligent.

“No one should be above the law,” Gardiner declared. “It doesn’t matter if you’re a member of the Royal Family, everyone should be treated the same.”

“I think it’s in the public interest to know whether or not Harry was completely transparent in documenting all of his drug use that he outlined in ‘Spare,’” Gardiner said. “I think that the public will be really outraged if he was admitted to the United States through a system of preference and privilege, or he got in without revealing the full information.”

They should have the Harry dilemma as an episode on tv's Border Security and have a dog sniff his luggage.

In his blockbuster book “Spare,” Harry admitted using cocaine and the psychedelic drug ayahuasca; the latter is illegal in the United States unless used for religious purposes.

Harry should immediately be deported along with his lovely wife Meghan.

Heritage Foundation attorney Samuel Dewey, who formerly supervised oversight and investigations on the U.S. House of Representatives Financial Services Committee, warned that if DHS does not produce the records by April 12, the foundation will sue the federal government.

“Even if he came in through a visa, it still has to be cleared by DHS, because you also have to be admissible to the country,” Dewey claimed. “Our request concerns whether or not he’s admissible without a waiver, given his long history of narcotics use. Individuals in the past with that history have not been let into the country.”

“There’s a precedent for getting this immigration information from the immigration authorities,” Dewey stated. “The first question that a court will ask is, how much of a privacy interest is there here? And we think it’s as low as it can be. This is a public figure who’s been notoriously open for commercial gain. He has so aggressively put himself into the public for his commercial benefit that it’s a perfect storm of diminished privacy rights.”

“The second question the court will ask is what is the public interest?” Dewey continued. “We’ve got a serious problem with our immigration system in this country. And a big part of that problem is laws are not being enforced.”

“If they’re spending a lot of time giving a special unjustified preference to Prince Harry, how does that affect the common immigration applications where people have carefully dotted every I and crossed every T?” he asked.

It's obvious to even the casual observer, that Prince Harry's narcotics history has affected his brain, and he doesn't have any extra neurons to spare. But at least he has Meghan to do his thinking for him.

Tweet

Prince Harry and Meghan win environment award for decreasing royal flushes

"If it's yellow, let it mellow; but if it's brown, flush it down." --Prince Harry and Meghan Markle

The environmental group known as Conserve Water--Save the World's Thirsty Minorities has awarded Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle the annual "Gulp Award" for their efforts at saving water and helping the poor and lower middle class to avoid dehydration.

As Brain Flushing wanted to report in 2019 but did not get the interview, the semi-royal family told British Vogue magazine that they would only drink water when they are out of alcoholic beverages or when same were unavailable. 

In addition, the couple vowed to only use their royal flush of the porcelain throne when it was graced with their fecal matter.

The Golden Throne they call their own

"Nothing says you care about the little guy than having the big guys ration their toilet water," Suzee Sezzpoule, CEO of Conserve Water--Save the World's Thirsty Minorities. "It takes real determination and dedication to minimize the often flagrant or mindless use of water. People are dying of thirst in Africa and deserts. Prince Harry and Meghan are great examples of courage and unselfish preservation of the planet's most precious resource. Water."

Accepting the award was Meghan Markle on behalf of her husband and herself along with their two environmentally appropriate children.

"Thank you," Ms. Markle began, "thank you, thank you, thank you. On behalf of Harry, Archie Harrison, Lilibet Diana, and myself, thank you. This means a lot to us, especially Harry, who has made the greatest sacrifice than the rest of us."

Why not consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against ignorance and evil.

Tweet

Prince Harry and Meghan admitted they lied during the Oprah drool-fest

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, his B actress wife, admitted in the Oprah Winfrey interview Monday that they lied about being married in secret three days before they were publicly married.

A spokesperson for the former royal couple told The Daily Beast that “the couple exchanged personal vows a few days before their official/legal wedding on May 19.” 

It turns out that Harry and Meghan claimed in the March 7 interview with Winfrey that they had actually married in a private garden ceremony days before the public ritual. 

The claim was immediately questioned by Anglican church officials who worried the couple would be destined to the fires of hell for lying to so many people on live television--a lie that the whole world [except perhaps for a number of Middle Eastern and African countries] would witness from that Sunday interview.

The couple said they were actually married three days before their public wedding in a private ceremony attended only by themselves and the Archbishop of Canterbury, not the shoe company with a similar name.

British legal experts say that they either lied about the private ceremony or insist it was illegitimate under Church of England law, which might make Archie an illegitimate heir to nothing royal.

Reverend Canon Giles Fraser, the rector of St. Mary Newington church in London, asserted that Harry and Meghan’s private ceremony was not a wedding. At most, it was a church blessing, an all hail, hip hip and all that rot.

“It wasn’t a wedding. It can’t have been,” Fraser told Insider. “It was probably a blessing. But they got married legally at Windsor.” 

The reverend also tweeted out a photo of the couple’s marriage license that stated the couple was to be married in the St. George’s Chapel in Windsor, not in a garden ceremony like the couple claimed in the interview in which they lied.

If they lied about a fake wedding, isn't it highly possible they lied about Meghan's claim that someone [who she refused to mention, thus shrouding the entire royal family with the cloak of guilt] asked her what color skin tone will the Archie be? Of course it's possible she lied because, you know, fruit of the poison tree, falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, and all that kind of legal mumbo jumbo.

And Harry even backed up Meghan's possibly false claim because nowadays, victimhood has strength and an invisible shield to leftist cancel culture, but not for Piers Morgan who said he didn't believe a word that Markle ever says and got canceled from his TV show, "Crumpets in the Morning" or something like that.

“Meghan & Harry’s nauseating two-hour Oprah whine-athon was a disgraceful diatribe of cynical race-baiting propaganda designed to damage the Queen as her husband lies in hospital — and destroy the Monarchy,” Morgan tweeted.

Even Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York accused the once upon a time royal couple of orchestrating the complaint of racism against the royal family for attention. 

Gee, ya think?

“On interview last night: Amid the nonstop whining, what stood out was the obviously planned Meghan/Harry tag-team racism charge. Make allegation you know will be a bombshell and then say Oh, no, we could never say who did it — never!” York correctly observed.

How cowardly. How disgusting. Crap like that deserves a royal flush.

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Harry sells his rifle collection to keep Meghan happy

Prince Harry, who some are unfairly calling "Princess Harriet," sold his custom-made hunting rifles in order to please his wife actress Meghan Markle, according to U.K. tabloids.

“A fellow hunter bought the pair of prized Purdey firearms, thought to be worth at least £50,000, in a private deal,” The Sun reported.

“Harry learnt to shoot as a child and once killed a one-ton buffalo,” the news outlet reported. “But Meghan is opposed to hunting and pals hinted the Duke of Sussex would give up to appease her.”

He also gave up three gallons of future testosterone.

Sadly, Harry, 35, did not attend recent shoots at Balmoral and Sandringham, according to The Sun. “He sold his two British-made guns five months ago — before he and Meghan, 38, quit the UK for a new life in North America.”

“He bought them because he wanted them, not because they belonged to Harry, but he was quite chuffed when he found out,” a friend of the anonymous buyer said. “They are beautiful examples and he’s very pleased with them but he’s not the sort of person who wants to boast about the royal connection.”

Conservationist ape fan, Jane Goodall, 86, said last week that Harry would likely stop hunting to please Meghan, rather than Meghan understanding Harry's love of hunting and support him.

Goodall told Radio Times Harry and brother Prince William “were champions of the natural world.” “Except they hunt and shoot,” she added. “But I think Harry will stop because Meghan doesn’t like hunting.”

What Goodall doesn't understand is that both things can be true at the same time: you can love the natural world and also love to hunt and shoot. If it was not for hunters and the money that goes into hunting licenses, there would be a devastation of wildlife from the lack of land afforded to the animals. And unless you're a strict vegan, you have nothing to say about people who hunt for sport and food.

Harry and Meghan announced they were leaving their royal duties behind to become financially independent in January. About a week following their bombshell announcement, Queen Elizabeth II financially cut off the couple and stripped away their titles.

“Harry, Meghan and Archie will always be much loved members of my family,” the Queen said in a statement, adding that she “support[s] their wish for a more independent life.” But more likely, she was only referring to Harry and Archie; Meghan is her Jughead.

As noted by U.K. outlet Express in January, Harry was also forced to give up his military titles when he chose the royal split. “Prince Harry, who made a career in the Armed Forces before he met Meghan Markle, will also lose some of his military titles,” the report outlined. “Prince Harry enjoyed 10 years in the Army, leaving in 2015.”

Harry “was the Captain-General of Royal Marines, Honorary Air Commandant Royal Air Force Honington, and Commodore-in-Chief of Small Ships and Diving,” Express said. “As his grandmother is the head of the Armed forces in the UK, the Queen can strip Harry of his titles.” 

And Meghan can strip him of his manhood. [Google "orchiectomy."]

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins

Tweet

A very, very Rev. wants prayers for Prince George to be gay

London -- A selfish Anglican minister is urging his flock to pray that a 4-year-old boy grow up to be gay, like him. The boy is Prince George, the elder child of Prince William and is third in line to the throne. The Very, Very Rev. Kelvin Holdsworth (I wonder what he thinks is worth holding) wants his freaking flock to pray that Prince George finds the love "of a fine young gentleman" when he grows up so as to advance a cause the Very, Very Rev. holds dear to his heart: the cause of same-sex marriage in church.

The Very, Very Rev. is known as a gay, gay rights campaigner and an Islamic apologist, as he makes contentious gestures for his causes.

The call to prayer comes just days after Prince Harry, an obvious heterosexual and war hero and George's uncle and fifth in line to the throne, announced his engagement to Meghan Markle of "Suits" fame.

Holdsworth just had to once again put a spotlight on the role of non-traditional royal romance with the Prince George request.

There is no reason to believe that Prince George will turn out to be gay as it is statistically improbable, although not very improbable. 

Prince Harry and Ms. Markle are to marry in May at St. George's Chapel at Windsor Castle. It is only since 2002 that the Church of England has permitted church marriages for divorced people, "in exceptional circumstances" at the discretion of the parish priest because marriage is supposed to be forever (LOL). 

Ms. Markle was married to Trevor Engelson in 2011 and divorced in 2013.

Holdsworth, who is remarkably selfish, wrote: "A royal wedding might sort things out remarkably easily, though we might have to wait 25 years for that to happen. Who knows whether that might be sooner than things might work out by other means." Which, when you get right down to it, is to the Very, Very Rev's. advantage.

It's bad enough you can't watch a Netflix original series without a token gay couple in it, now we have the Church of freaking England getting into the act.

I have nothing against homosexuality, but normalizing it by sticking it in our faces all the time makes the effort too obvious and objectionable.

Holdsworth has caused a rift among some in the religious community. For example, in January he permitted a reading from the Quran, the Muslim holy war manual, during a service that included a rebuttal that Jesus Christ was the son of God.

WTF! Why doesn't the Very, Very Rev. convert to Islam?

The Much More Rev. Gavin Ashenden, a former royal chaplain, called Holdsworth's comments unchristian.

Duh--of course they were.

"To pray for Prince George to grow up in that way" is to "pray in a way that would disable and undermine his constitutional and personal role," he told Christian Today, an online news provider, particularly when part of the expectation of George's role would be "to produce a biological heir with a woman he loves."

But Holdsworth is too selfish to let that little thing get in the way of his personal goal.

"It is an unkind and destabilizing prayer," Mr. Ashenden said. "It is the theological equivalent of the curse of the wicked fairy in one of the fairy tales."

Ooh . . . he said 'fairy.' That's racist.



Tweet