Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, his B actress wife, admitted in the Oprah Winfrey interview Monday that they lied about being married in secret three days before they were publicly married.
A spokesperson for the former royal couple told
The Daily Beast that “the couple exchanged personal vows a few days before their official/legal wedding on May 19.”
It turns out that Harry and Meghan claimed in the March 7 interview with Winfrey that they had actually married in a private garden ceremony days before the public ritual.
The claim was immediately questioned by Anglican church officials who worried the couple would be destined to the fires of hell for lying to so many people on live television--a lie that the whole world [except perhaps for a number of Middle Eastern and African countries] would witness from that Sunday interview.
The couple said they were actually married three days before their public wedding in a private ceremony attended only by themselves and the Archbishop of Canterbury, not the shoe company with a similar name.
British legal experts say that they either lied about the private ceremony or insist it was illegitimate under Church of England law, which might make Archie an illegitimate heir to nothing royal.
Reverend Canon Giles Fraser, the rector of St. Mary Newington church in London, asserted that Harry and Meghan’s private ceremony was not a wedding. At most, it was a church blessing, an all hail, hip hip and all that rot.
“It wasn’t a wedding. It can’t have been,” Fraser told
Insider. “It was probably a blessing. But they got married legally at Windsor.”
The reverend also tweeted out a photo of the couple’s marriage license that stated the couple was to be married in the St. George’s Chapel in Windsor, not in a garden ceremony like the couple claimed in the interview in which they lied.
If they lied about a fake wedding, isn't it highly possible they lied about Meghan's claim that someone [who she refused to mention, thus shrouding the entire royal family with the cloak of guilt] asked her what color skin tone will the Archie be? Of course it's possible she lied because, you know, fruit of the poison tree, falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, and all that kind of legal mumbo jumbo.
And Harry even backed up Meghan's possibly false claim because nowadays, victimhood has strength and an invisible shield to leftist cancel culture, but not for Piers Morgan who said he didn't believe a word that Markle ever says and got canceled from his TV show, "Crumpets in the Morning" or something like that.
“Meghan & Harry’s nauseating two-hour Oprah whine-athon was a disgraceful diatribe of cynical race-baiting propaganda designed to damage the Queen as her husband lies in hospital — and destroy the Monarchy,” Morgan tweeted.
Even Washington Examiner chief political correspondent Byron York accused the once upon a time royal couple of orchestrating the complaint of racism against the royal family for attention.
Gee, ya think?
“On interview last night: Amid the nonstop whining, what stood out was the obviously planned Meghan/Harry tag-team racism charge. Make allegation you know will be a bombshell and then say Oh, no, we could never say who did it — never!” York correctly observed.
How cowardly. How disgusting. Crap like that deserves a royal flush.
Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.
Posts
